Why does a simple loop result in ASYNC_NETWORK_IO waits? The Next CEO of Stack OverflowSlow temp table drops in sql 2005Why is there ASYNC_NETWORK_IO wait type on Shared Memory connections?SPIDs stuck indefinitely in suspended stateGet specific result without using loopWhy do async_network_io wait types occur?Large Variation in Bulk Insert timeDoes dm_exec_procedure_stats.total_worker_time include signal waits?Why does a plan with FULL optimization show simple parameterization?Increased waits during checkpoint after upgrading to better storageSimple recursive CTE stuck in infinite loop

How can I prove that a state of equilibrium is unstable?

Find a path from s to t using as few red nodes as possible

Planeswalker Ability and Death Timing

My ex-girlfriend uses my Apple ID to login to her iPad, do I have to give her my Apple ID password to reset it?

What difference does it make matching a word with/without a trailing whitespace?

What is a typical Mizrachi Seder like?

Shortening a title without changing its meaning

How exploitable/balanced is this homebrew spell: Spell Permanency?

What does this strange code stamp on my passport mean?

Why was Sir Cadogan fired?

Why do we say “un seul M” and not “une seule M” even though M is a “consonne”?

My boss doesn't want me to have a side project

Gödel's incompleteness theorems - what are the religious implications?

Is it OK to decorate a log book cover?

Do I need to write [sic] when including a quotation with a number less than 10 that isn't written out?

Is it a bad idea to plug the other end of ESD strap to wall ground?

How can a day be of 24 hours?

Does Germany produce more waste than the US?

How does a dynamic QR code work?

Can Sri Krishna be called 'a person'?

Compensation for working overtime on Saturdays

Gauss' Posthumous Publications?

Prodigo = pro + ago?

Why did early computer designers eschew integers?



Why does a simple loop result in ASYNC_NETWORK_IO waits?



The Next CEO of Stack OverflowSlow temp table drops in sql 2005Why is there ASYNC_NETWORK_IO wait type on Shared Memory connections?SPIDs stuck indefinitely in suspended stateGet specific result without using loopWhy do async_network_io wait types occur?Large Variation in Bulk Insert timeDoes dm_exec_procedure_stats.total_worker_time include signal waits?Why does a plan with FULL optimization show simple parameterization?Increased waits during checkpoint after upgrading to better storageSimple recursive CTE stuck in infinite loop










18















The following T-SQL takes about 25 seconds on my machine with SSMS v17.9:



DECLARE @outer_loop INT = 0,
@big_string_for_u VARCHAR(8000);

SET NOCOUNT ON;

WHILE @outer_loop < 50000000
BEGIN
SET @big_string_for_u = 'ZZZZZZZZZZ';
SET @outer_loop = @outer_loop + 1;
END;


It accumulates 532 ms of ASYNC_NETWORK_IO waits according to both sys.dm_exec_session_wait_stats and sys.dm_os_wait_stats. The total wait time increases as the number of loop iterations increases. Using the wait_completed extended event I can see that the wait happens roughly every 43 ms with a few exceptions:



wait table



In addition, I can get the call stacks that occur right before the ASYNC_NETWORK_IO wait:



sqldk.dll!SOS_DispatcherBase::GetTrack+0x7f6c
sqldk.dll!SOS_Scheduler::PromotePendingTask+0x204
sqldk.dll!SOS_Task::PostWait+0x5f
sqldk.dll!SOS_Scheduler::Suspend+0xb15
sqllang.dll!CSECCNGProvider::GetBCryptHandleFromAlgID+0xf6af
sqllang.dll!CSECCNGProvider::GetBCryptHandleFromAlgID+0xf44c
sqllang.dll!SNIPacketRelease+0xd63
sqllang.dll!SNIPacketRelease+0x2097
sqllang.dll!SNIPacketRelease+0x1f99
sqllang.dll!SNIPacketRelease+0x18fe
sqllang.dll!CAutoExecuteAsContext::Restore+0x52d
sqllang.dll!CSQLSource::Execute+0x151b
sqllang.dll!CSQLSource::Execute+0xe13
sqllang.dll!CSQLSource::Execute+0x474
sqllang.dll!SNIPacketRelease+0x165d
sqllang.dll!CValOdsRow::CValOdsRow+0xa92
sqllang.dll!CValOdsRow::CValOdsRow+0x883
sqldk.dll!ClockHand::Statistic::RecordClockHandStats+0x15d
sqldk.dll!ClockHand::Statistic::RecordClockHandStats+0x638
sqldk.dll!ClockHand::Statistic::RecordClockHandStats+0x2ad
sqldk.dll!SystemThread::MakeMiniSOSThread+0xdf8
sqldk.dll!SystemThread::MakeMiniSOSThread+0xf00
sqldk.dll!SystemThread::MakeMiniSOSThread+0x667
sqldk.dll!SystemThread::MakeMiniSOSThread+0xbb9


Finally, I noticed that SSMS uses a surprising amount of CPU during the loop (about half a core on average). I'm unable to figure out what SSMS is doing during that time.



Why does a simple loop cause ASYNC_NETWORK_IOwaits when executed through SSMS? The only output that I appear to get from the client from this query execution is the "Commands completed successfully." message.










share|improve this question


























    18















    The following T-SQL takes about 25 seconds on my machine with SSMS v17.9:



    DECLARE @outer_loop INT = 0,
    @big_string_for_u VARCHAR(8000);

    SET NOCOUNT ON;

    WHILE @outer_loop < 50000000
    BEGIN
    SET @big_string_for_u = 'ZZZZZZZZZZ';
    SET @outer_loop = @outer_loop + 1;
    END;


    It accumulates 532 ms of ASYNC_NETWORK_IO waits according to both sys.dm_exec_session_wait_stats and sys.dm_os_wait_stats. The total wait time increases as the number of loop iterations increases. Using the wait_completed extended event I can see that the wait happens roughly every 43 ms with a few exceptions:



    wait table



    In addition, I can get the call stacks that occur right before the ASYNC_NETWORK_IO wait:



    sqldk.dll!SOS_DispatcherBase::GetTrack+0x7f6c
    sqldk.dll!SOS_Scheduler::PromotePendingTask+0x204
    sqldk.dll!SOS_Task::PostWait+0x5f
    sqldk.dll!SOS_Scheduler::Suspend+0xb15
    sqllang.dll!CSECCNGProvider::GetBCryptHandleFromAlgID+0xf6af
    sqllang.dll!CSECCNGProvider::GetBCryptHandleFromAlgID+0xf44c
    sqllang.dll!SNIPacketRelease+0xd63
    sqllang.dll!SNIPacketRelease+0x2097
    sqllang.dll!SNIPacketRelease+0x1f99
    sqllang.dll!SNIPacketRelease+0x18fe
    sqllang.dll!CAutoExecuteAsContext::Restore+0x52d
    sqllang.dll!CSQLSource::Execute+0x151b
    sqllang.dll!CSQLSource::Execute+0xe13
    sqllang.dll!CSQLSource::Execute+0x474
    sqllang.dll!SNIPacketRelease+0x165d
    sqllang.dll!CValOdsRow::CValOdsRow+0xa92
    sqllang.dll!CValOdsRow::CValOdsRow+0x883
    sqldk.dll!ClockHand::Statistic::RecordClockHandStats+0x15d
    sqldk.dll!ClockHand::Statistic::RecordClockHandStats+0x638
    sqldk.dll!ClockHand::Statistic::RecordClockHandStats+0x2ad
    sqldk.dll!SystemThread::MakeMiniSOSThread+0xdf8
    sqldk.dll!SystemThread::MakeMiniSOSThread+0xf00
    sqldk.dll!SystemThread::MakeMiniSOSThread+0x667
    sqldk.dll!SystemThread::MakeMiniSOSThread+0xbb9


    Finally, I noticed that SSMS uses a surprising amount of CPU during the loop (about half a core on average). I'm unable to figure out what SSMS is doing during that time.



    Why does a simple loop cause ASYNC_NETWORK_IOwaits when executed through SSMS? The only output that I appear to get from the client from this query execution is the "Commands completed successfully." message.










    share|improve this question
























      18












      18








      18


      3






      The following T-SQL takes about 25 seconds on my machine with SSMS v17.9:



      DECLARE @outer_loop INT = 0,
      @big_string_for_u VARCHAR(8000);

      SET NOCOUNT ON;

      WHILE @outer_loop < 50000000
      BEGIN
      SET @big_string_for_u = 'ZZZZZZZZZZ';
      SET @outer_loop = @outer_loop + 1;
      END;


      It accumulates 532 ms of ASYNC_NETWORK_IO waits according to both sys.dm_exec_session_wait_stats and sys.dm_os_wait_stats. The total wait time increases as the number of loop iterations increases. Using the wait_completed extended event I can see that the wait happens roughly every 43 ms with a few exceptions:



      wait table



      In addition, I can get the call stacks that occur right before the ASYNC_NETWORK_IO wait:



      sqldk.dll!SOS_DispatcherBase::GetTrack+0x7f6c
      sqldk.dll!SOS_Scheduler::PromotePendingTask+0x204
      sqldk.dll!SOS_Task::PostWait+0x5f
      sqldk.dll!SOS_Scheduler::Suspend+0xb15
      sqllang.dll!CSECCNGProvider::GetBCryptHandleFromAlgID+0xf6af
      sqllang.dll!CSECCNGProvider::GetBCryptHandleFromAlgID+0xf44c
      sqllang.dll!SNIPacketRelease+0xd63
      sqllang.dll!SNIPacketRelease+0x2097
      sqllang.dll!SNIPacketRelease+0x1f99
      sqllang.dll!SNIPacketRelease+0x18fe
      sqllang.dll!CAutoExecuteAsContext::Restore+0x52d
      sqllang.dll!CSQLSource::Execute+0x151b
      sqllang.dll!CSQLSource::Execute+0xe13
      sqllang.dll!CSQLSource::Execute+0x474
      sqllang.dll!SNIPacketRelease+0x165d
      sqllang.dll!CValOdsRow::CValOdsRow+0xa92
      sqllang.dll!CValOdsRow::CValOdsRow+0x883
      sqldk.dll!ClockHand::Statistic::RecordClockHandStats+0x15d
      sqldk.dll!ClockHand::Statistic::RecordClockHandStats+0x638
      sqldk.dll!ClockHand::Statistic::RecordClockHandStats+0x2ad
      sqldk.dll!SystemThread::MakeMiniSOSThread+0xdf8
      sqldk.dll!SystemThread::MakeMiniSOSThread+0xf00
      sqldk.dll!SystemThread::MakeMiniSOSThread+0x667
      sqldk.dll!SystemThread::MakeMiniSOSThread+0xbb9


      Finally, I noticed that SSMS uses a surprising amount of CPU during the loop (about half a core on average). I'm unable to figure out what SSMS is doing during that time.



      Why does a simple loop cause ASYNC_NETWORK_IOwaits when executed through SSMS? The only output that I appear to get from the client from this query execution is the "Commands completed successfully." message.










      share|improve this question














      The following T-SQL takes about 25 seconds on my machine with SSMS v17.9:



      DECLARE @outer_loop INT = 0,
      @big_string_for_u VARCHAR(8000);

      SET NOCOUNT ON;

      WHILE @outer_loop < 50000000
      BEGIN
      SET @big_string_for_u = 'ZZZZZZZZZZ';
      SET @outer_loop = @outer_loop + 1;
      END;


      It accumulates 532 ms of ASYNC_NETWORK_IO waits according to both sys.dm_exec_session_wait_stats and sys.dm_os_wait_stats. The total wait time increases as the number of loop iterations increases. Using the wait_completed extended event I can see that the wait happens roughly every 43 ms with a few exceptions:



      wait table



      In addition, I can get the call stacks that occur right before the ASYNC_NETWORK_IO wait:



      sqldk.dll!SOS_DispatcherBase::GetTrack+0x7f6c
      sqldk.dll!SOS_Scheduler::PromotePendingTask+0x204
      sqldk.dll!SOS_Task::PostWait+0x5f
      sqldk.dll!SOS_Scheduler::Suspend+0xb15
      sqllang.dll!CSECCNGProvider::GetBCryptHandleFromAlgID+0xf6af
      sqllang.dll!CSECCNGProvider::GetBCryptHandleFromAlgID+0xf44c
      sqllang.dll!SNIPacketRelease+0xd63
      sqllang.dll!SNIPacketRelease+0x2097
      sqllang.dll!SNIPacketRelease+0x1f99
      sqllang.dll!SNIPacketRelease+0x18fe
      sqllang.dll!CAutoExecuteAsContext::Restore+0x52d
      sqllang.dll!CSQLSource::Execute+0x151b
      sqllang.dll!CSQLSource::Execute+0xe13
      sqllang.dll!CSQLSource::Execute+0x474
      sqllang.dll!SNIPacketRelease+0x165d
      sqllang.dll!CValOdsRow::CValOdsRow+0xa92
      sqllang.dll!CValOdsRow::CValOdsRow+0x883
      sqldk.dll!ClockHand::Statistic::RecordClockHandStats+0x15d
      sqldk.dll!ClockHand::Statistic::RecordClockHandStats+0x638
      sqldk.dll!ClockHand::Statistic::RecordClockHandStats+0x2ad
      sqldk.dll!SystemThread::MakeMiniSOSThread+0xdf8
      sqldk.dll!SystemThread::MakeMiniSOSThread+0xf00
      sqldk.dll!SystemThread::MakeMiniSOSThread+0x667
      sqldk.dll!SystemThread::MakeMiniSOSThread+0xbb9


      Finally, I noticed that SSMS uses a surprising amount of CPU during the loop (about half a core on average). I'm unable to figure out what SSMS is doing during that time.



      Why does a simple loop cause ASYNC_NETWORK_IOwaits when executed through SSMS? The only output that I appear to get from the client from this query execution is the "Commands completed successfully." message.







      sql-server ssms






      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question











      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question










      asked Mar 22 at 4:21









      Joe ObbishJoe Obbish

      21.6k43190




      21.6k43190




















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          29














          The documentation for SET NOCOUNT says:




          SET NOCOUNT ON prevents the sending of DONE_IN_PROC messages to the client for each statement in a stored procedure. For stored procedures that contain several statements that do not return much actual data, or for procedures that contain Transact-SQL loops, setting SET NOCOUNT to ON can provide a significant performance boost, because network traffic is greatly reduced.




          You are not running the statements in a stored procedure, so SQL Server sends DONE tokens (code 0xFD) to indicate the completion status of each SQL statement. These messages are deferred, and sent asynchronously when the network packet is full. When the client does not consume network packets quickly enough, eventually the buffers fill up, and the operation becomes blocking for SQL Server, generating the ASYNC_NETWORK_IO waits.



          Note the DONE tokens are different from DONEINPROC (code 0xFF) as the documentation notes:




          • A DONE token is returned for each SQL statement in the SQL batch except variable declarations.


          • For execution of SQL statements within stored procedures, DONEPROC and DONEINPROC tokens are used in place of DONE tokens.




          You will see a dramatic reduction in ASYNC_NETWORK_IO waits using:



          CREATE PROCEDURE #P AS
          SET NOCOUNT ON;

          DECLARE
          @outer_loop integer = 0,
          @big_string_for_u varchar(8000);


          WHILE @outer_loop < 5000000
          BEGIN
          SET @big_string_for_u = 'ZZZZZZZZZZ';
          SET @outer_loop = @outer_loop + 1;
          END;
          GO
          EXECUTE dbo.#P;


          You could also use sys.sp_executesql to achieve the same result.



          Example stack trace captured just as an ASYNC_NETWORK_IO wait begins:



          sending a packet



          An example TDS packet as seen in the inline function sqllang!srv_completioncode_ex<1> had the following 13 bytes:



          fd 01 00 c1 00 01 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 


          Which decodes to:



          • TokenType = 0xfd DONE_TOKEN

          • Status = 0x0001 DONE_MORE

          • CurCmd = 0x00c1 (193)

          • DoneRowCount = 0x00000001 (1)

          Ultimately, the number of ASYNC_NETWORK_IO waits depends on the client and driver, and what it does, if anything, with all the DONE messages. Testing with a loop 1/10th of the size given in the question (5,000,000 loop iterations) I found SSMS ran for about 4 seconds with 200-300 ms of waits. sqlcmd ran for 2-3 seconds with single digit ms waits; osql around the same run time with around 10 ms of waits.



          The worst client by far for this test was Azure Data Studio. It ran for almost 6 hours:



          ADS






          share|improve this answer

























            Your Answer








            StackExchange.ready(function()
            var channelOptions =
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "182"
            ;
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
            createEditor();
            );

            else
            createEditor();

            );

            function createEditor()
            StackExchange.prepareEditor(
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
            convertImagesToLinks: false,
            noModals: true,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: null,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            imageUploader:
            brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
            contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
            allowUrls: true
            ,
            onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            );



            );













            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fdba.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f232816%2fwhy-does-a-simple-loop-result-in-async-network-io-waits%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown

























            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes








            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes









            29














            The documentation for SET NOCOUNT says:




            SET NOCOUNT ON prevents the sending of DONE_IN_PROC messages to the client for each statement in a stored procedure. For stored procedures that contain several statements that do not return much actual data, or for procedures that contain Transact-SQL loops, setting SET NOCOUNT to ON can provide a significant performance boost, because network traffic is greatly reduced.




            You are not running the statements in a stored procedure, so SQL Server sends DONE tokens (code 0xFD) to indicate the completion status of each SQL statement. These messages are deferred, and sent asynchronously when the network packet is full. When the client does not consume network packets quickly enough, eventually the buffers fill up, and the operation becomes blocking for SQL Server, generating the ASYNC_NETWORK_IO waits.



            Note the DONE tokens are different from DONEINPROC (code 0xFF) as the documentation notes:




            • A DONE token is returned for each SQL statement in the SQL batch except variable declarations.


            • For execution of SQL statements within stored procedures, DONEPROC and DONEINPROC tokens are used in place of DONE tokens.




            You will see a dramatic reduction in ASYNC_NETWORK_IO waits using:



            CREATE PROCEDURE #P AS
            SET NOCOUNT ON;

            DECLARE
            @outer_loop integer = 0,
            @big_string_for_u varchar(8000);


            WHILE @outer_loop < 5000000
            BEGIN
            SET @big_string_for_u = 'ZZZZZZZZZZ';
            SET @outer_loop = @outer_loop + 1;
            END;
            GO
            EXECUTE dbo.#P;


            You could also use sys.sp_executesql to achieve the same result.



            Example stack trace captured just as an ASYNC_NETWORK_IO wait begins:



            sending a packet



            An example TDS packet as seen in the inline function sqllang!srv_completioncode_ex<1> had the following 13 bytes:



            fd 01 00 c1 00 01 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 


            Which decodes to:



            • TokenType = 0xfd DONE_TOKEN

            • Status = 0x0001 DONE_MORE

            • CurCmd = 0x00c1 (193)

            • DoneRowCount = 0x00000001 (1)

            Ultimately, the number of ASYNC_NETWORK_IO waits depends on the client and driver, and what it does, if anything, with all the DONE messages. Testing with a loop 1/10th of the size given in the question (5,000,000 loop iterations) I found SSMS ran for about 4 seconds with 200-300 ms of waits. sqlcmd ran for 2-3 seconds with single digit ms waits; osql around the same run time with around 10 ms of waits.



            The worst client by far for this test was Azure Data Studio. It ran for almost 6 hours:



            ADS






            share|improve this answer





























              29














              The documentation for SET NOCOUNT says:




              SET NOCOUNT ON prevents the sending of DONE_IN_PROC messages to the client for each statement in a stored procedure. For stored procedures that contain several statements that do not return much actual data, or for procedures that contain Transact-SQL loops, setting SET NOCOUNT to ON can provide a significant performance boost, because network traffic is greatly reduced.




              You are not running the statements in a stored procedure, so SQL Server sends DONE tokens (code 0xFD) to indicate the completion status of each SQL statement. These messages are deferred, and sent asynchronously when the network packet is full. When the client does not consume network packets quickly enough, eventually the buffers fill up, and the operation becomes blocking for SQL Server, generating the ASYNC_NETWORK_IO waits.



              Note the DONE tokens are different from DONEINPROC (code 0xFF) as the documentation notes:




              • A DONE token is returned for each SQL statement in the SQL batch except variable declarations.


              • For execution of SQL statements within stored procedures, DONEPROC and DONEINPROC tokens are used in place of DONE tokens.




              You will see a dramatic reduction in ASYNC_NETWORK_IO waits using:



              CREATE PROCEDURE #P AS
              SET NOCOUNT ON;

              DECLARE
              @outer_loop integer = 0,
              @big_string_for_u varchar(8000);


              WHILE @outer_loop < 5000000
              BEGIN
              SET @big_string_for_u = 'ZZZZZZZZZZ';
              SET @outer_loop = @outer_loop + 1;
              END;
              GO
              EXECUTE dbo.#P;


              You could also use sys.sp_executesql to achieve the same result.



              Example stack trace captured just as an ASYNC_NETWORK_IO wait begins:



              sending a packet



              An example TDS packet as seen in the inline function sqllang!srv_completioncode_ex<1> had the following 13 bytes:



              fd 01 00 c1 00 01 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 


              Which decodes to:



              • TokenType = 0xfd DONE_TOKEN

              • Status = 0x0001 DONE_MORE

              • CurCmd = 0x00c1 (193)

              • DoneRowCount = 0x00000001 (1)

              Ultimately, the number of ASYNC_NETWORK_IO waits depends on the client and driver, and what it does, if anything, with all the DONE messages. Testing with a loop 1/10th of the size given in the question (5,000,000 loop iterations) I found SSMS ran for about 4 seconds with 200-300 ms of waits. sqlcmd ran for 2-3 seconds with single digit ms waits; osql around the same run time with around 10 ms of waits.



              The worst client by far for this test was Azure Data Studio. It ran for almost 6 hours:



              ADS






              share|improve this answer



























                29












                29








                29







                The documentation for SET NOCOUNT says:




                SET NOCOUNT ON prevents the sending of DONE_IN_PROC messages to the client for each statement in a stored procedure. For stored procedures that contain several statements that do not return much actual data, or for procedures that contain Transact-SQL loops, setting SET NOCOUNT to ON can provide a significant performance boost, because network traffic is greatly reduced.




                You are not running the statements in a stored procedure, so SQL Server sends DONE tokens (code 0xFD) to indicate the completion status of each SQL statement. These messages are deferred, and sent asynchronously when the network packet is full. When the client does not consume network packets quickly enough, eventually the buffers fill up, and the operation becomes blocking for SQL Server, generating the ASYNC_NETWORK_IO waits.



                Note the DONE tokens are different from DONEINPROC (code 0xFF) as the documentation notes:




                • A DONE token is returned for each SQL statement in the SQL batch except variable declarations.


                • For execution of SQL statements within stored procedures, DONEPROC and DONEINPROC tokens are used in place of DONE tokens.




                You will see a dramatic reduction in ASYNC_NETWORK_IO waits using:



                CREATE PROCEDURE #P AS
                SET NOCOUNT ON;

                DECLARE
                @outer_loop integer = 0,
                @big_string_for_u varchar(8000);


                WHILE @outer_loop < 5000000
                BEGIN
                SET @big_string_for_u = 'ZZZZZZZZZZ';
                SET @outer_loop = @outer_loop + 1;
                END;
                GO
                EXECUTE dbo.#P;


                You could also use sys.sp_executesql to achieve the same result.



                Example stack trace captured just as an ASYNC_NETWORK_IO wait begins:



                sending a packet



                An example TDS packet as seen in the inline function sqllang!srv_completioncode_ex<1> had the following 13 bytes:



                fd 01 00 c1 00 01 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 


                Which decodes to:



                • TokenType = 0xfd DONE_TOKEN

                • Status = 0x0001 DONE_MORE

                • CurCmd = 0x00c1 (193)

                • DoneRowCount = 0x00000001 (1)

                Ultimately, the number of ASYNC_NETWORK_IO waits depends on the client and driver, and what it does, if anything, with all the DONE messages. Testing with a loop 1/10th of the size given in the question (5,000,000 loop iterations) I found SSMS ran for about 4 seconds with 200-300 ms of waits. sqlcmd ran for 2-3 seconds with single digit ms waits; osql around the same run time with around 10 ms of waits.



                The worst client by far for this test was Azure Data Studio. It ran for almost 6 hours:



                ADS






                share|improve this answer















                The documentation for SET NOCOUNT says:




                SET NOCOUNT ON prevents the sending of DONE_IN_PROC messages to the client for each statement in a stored procedure. For stored procedures that contain several statements that do not return much actual data, or for procedures that contain Transact-SQL loops, setting SET NOCOUNT to ON can provide a significant performance boost, because network traffic is greatly reduced.




                You are not running the statements in a stored procedure, so SQL Server sends DONE tokens (code 0xFD) to indicate the completion status of each SQL statement. These messages are deferred, and sent asynchronously when the network packet is full. When the client does not consume network packets quickly enough, eventually the buffers fill up, and the operation becomes blocking for SQL Server, generating the ASYNC_NETWORK_IO waits.



                Note the DONE tokens are different from DONEINPROC (code 0xFF) as the documentation notes:




                • A DONE token is returned for each SQL statement in the SQL batch except variable declarations.


                • For execution of SQL statements within stored procedures, DONEPROC and DONEINPROC tokens are used in place of DONE tokens.




                You will see a dramatic reduction in ASYNC_NETWORK_IO waits using:



                CREATE PROCEDURE #P AS
                SET NOCOUNT ON;

                DECLARE
                @outer_loop integer = 0,
                @big_string_for_u varchar(8000);


                WHILE @outer_loop < 5000000
                BEGIN
                SET @big_string_for_u = 'ZZZZZZZZZZ';
                SET @outer_loop = @outer_loop + 1;
                END;
                GO
                EXECUTE dbo.#P;


                You could also use sys.sp_executesql to achieve the same result.



                Example stack trace captured just as an ASYNC_NETWORK_IO wait begins:



                sending a packet



                An example TDS packet as seen in the inline function sqllang!srv_completioncode_ex<1> had the following 13 bytes:



                fd 01 00 c1 00 01 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 


                Which decodes to:



                • TokenType = 0xfd DONE_TOKEN

                • Status = 0x0001 DONE_MORE

                • CurCmd = 0x00c1 (193)

                • DoneRowCount = 0x00000001 (1)

                Ultimately, the number of ASYNC_NETWORK_IO waits depends on the client and driver, and what it does, if anything, with all the DONE messages. Testing with a loop 1/10th of the size given in the question (5,000,000 loop iterations) I found SSMS ran for about 4 seconds with 200-300 ms of waits. sqlcmd ran for 2-3 seconds with single digit ms waits; osql around the same run time with around 10 ms of waits.



                The worst client by far for this test was Azure Data Studio. It ran for almost 6 hours:



                ADS







                share|improve this answer














                share|improve this answer



                share|improve this answer








                edited Mar 22 at 22:31

























                answered Mar 22 at 6:42









                Paul WhitePaul White

                54k14287459




                54k14287459



























                    draft saved

                    draft discarded
















































                    Thanks for contributing an answer to Database Administrators Stack Exchange!


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid


                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function ()
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fdba.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f232816%2fwhy-does-a-simple-loop-result-in-async-network-io-waits%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                    );

                    Post as a guest















                    Required, but never shown





















































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown

































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown







                    Popular posts from this blog

                    Færeyskur hestur Heimild | Tengill | Tilvísanir | LeiðsagnarvalRossið - síða um færeyska hrossið á færeyskuGott ár hjá færeyska hestinum

                    He _____ here since 1970 . Answer needed [closed]What does “since he was so high” mean?Meaning of “catch birds for”?How do I ensure “since” takes the meaning I want?“Who cares here” meaningWhat does “right round toward” mean?the time tense (had now been detected)What does the phrase “ring around the roses” mean here?Correct usage of “visited upon”Meaning of “foiled rail sabotage bid”It was the third time I had gone to Rome or It is the third time I had been to Rome

                    Slayer Innehåll Historia | Stil, komposition och lyrik | Bandets betydelse och framgångar | Sidoprojekt och samarbeten | Kontroverser | Medlemmar | Utmärkelser och nomineringar | Turnéer och festivaler | Diskografi | Referenser | Externa länkar | Navigeringsmenywww.slayer.net”Metal Massacre vol. 1””Metal Massacre vol. 3””Metal Massacre Volume III””Show No Mercy””Haunting the Chapel””Live Undead””Hell Awaits””Reign in Blood””Reign in Blood””Gold & Platinum – Reign in Blood””Golden Gods Awards Winners”originalet”Kerrang! Hall Of Fame””Slayer Looks Back On 37-Year Career In New Video Series: Part Two””South of Heaven””Gold & Platinum – South of Heaven””Seasons in the Abyss””Gold & Platinum - Seasons in the Abyss””Divine Intervention””Divine Intervention - Release group by Slayer””Gold & Platinum - Divine Intervention””Live Intrusion””Undisputed Attitude””Abolish Government/Superficial Love””Release “Slatanic Slaughter: A Tribute to Slayer” by Various Artists””Diabolus in Musica””Soundtrack to the Apocalypse””God Hates Us All””Systematic - Relationships””War at the Warfield””Gold & Platinum - War at the Warfield””Soundtrack to the Apocalypse””Gold & Platinum - Still Reigning””Metallica, Slayer, Iron Mauden Among Winners At Metal Hammer Awards””Eternal Pyre””Eternal Pyre - Slayer release group””Eternal Pyre””Metal Storm Awards 2006””Kerrang! Hall Of Fame””Slayer Wins 'Best Metal' Grammy Award””Slayer Guitarist Jeff Hanneman Dies””Bullet-For My Valentine booed at Metal Hammer Golden Gods Awards””Unholy Aliance””The End Of Slayer?””Slayer: We Could Thrash Out Two More Albums If We're Fast Enough...””'The Unholy Alliance: Chapter III' UK Dates Added”originalet”Megadeth And Slayer To Co-Headline 'Canadian Carnage' Trek”originalet”World Painted Blood””Release “World Painted Blood” by Slayer””Metallica Heading To Cinemas””Slayer, Megadeth To Join Forces For 'European Carnage' Tour - Dec. 18, 2010”originalet”Slayer's Hanneman Contracts Acute Infection; Band To Bring In Guest Guitarist””Cannibal Corpse's Pat O'Brien Will Step In As Slayer's Guest Guitarist”originalet”Slayer’s Jeff Hanneman Dead at 49””Dave Lombardo Says He Made Only $67,000 In 2011 While Touring With Slayer””Slayer: We Do Not Agree With Dave Lombardo's Substance Or Timeline Of Events””Slayer Welcomes Drummer Paul Bostaph Back To The Fold””Slayer Hope to Unveil Never-Before-Heard Jeff Hanneman Material on Next Album””Slayer Debut New Song 'Implode' During Surprise Golden Gods Appearance””Release group Repentless by Slayer””Repentless - Slayer - Credits””Slayer””Metal Storm Awards 2015””Slayer - to release comic book "Repentless #1"””Slayer To Release 'Repentless' 6.66" Vinyl Box Set””BREAKING NEWS: Slayer Announce Farewell Tour””Slayer Recruit Lamb of God, Anthrax, Behemoth + Testament for Final Tour””Slayer lägger ner efter 37 år””Slayer Announces Second North American Leg Of 'Final' Tour””Final World Tour””Slayer Announces Final European Tour With Lamb of God, Anthrax And Obituary””Slayer To Tour Europe With Lamb of God, Anthrax And Obituary””Slayer To Play 'Last French Show Ever' At Next Year's Hellfst””Slayer's Final World Tour Will Extend Into 2019””Death Angel's Rob Cavestany On Slayer's 'Farewell' Tour: 'Some Of Us Could See This Coming'””Testament Has No Plans To Retire Anytime Soon, Says Chuck Billy””Anthrax's Scott Ian On Slayer's 'Farewell' Tour Plans: 'I Was Surprised And I Wasn't Surprised'””Slayer””Slayer's Morbid Schlock””Review/Rock; For Slayer, the Mania Is the Message””Slayer - Biography””Slayer - Reign In Blood”originalet”Dave Lombardo””An exclusive oral history of Slayer”originalet”Exclusive! Interview With Slayer Guitarist Jeff Hanneman”originalet”Thinking Out Loud: Slayer's Kerry King on hair metal, Satan and being polite””Slayer Lyrics””Slayer - Biography””Most influential artists for extreme metal music””Slayer - Reign in Blood””Slayer guitarist Jeff Hanneman dies aged 49””Slatanic Slaughter: A Tribute to Slayer””Gateway to Hell: A Tribute to Slayer””Covered In Blood””Slayer: The Origins of Thrash in San Francisco, CA.””Why They Rule - #6 Slayer”originalet”Guitar World's 100 Greatest Heavy Metal Guitarists Of All Time”originalet”The fans have spoken: Slayer comes out on top in readers' polls”originalet”Tribute to Jeff Hanneman (1964-2013)””Lamb Of God Frontman: We Sound Like A Slayer Rip-Off””BEHEMOTH Frontman Pays Tribute To SLAYER's JEFF HANNEMAN””Slayer, Hatebreed Doing Double Duty On This Year's Ozzfest””System of a Down””Lacuna Coil’s Andrea Ferro Talks Influences, Skateboarding, Band Origins + More””Slayer - Reign in Blood””Into The Lungs of Hell””Slayer rules - en utställning om fans””Slayer and Their Fans Slashed Through a No-Holds-Barred Night at Gas Monkey””Home””Slayer””Gold & Platinum - The Big 4 Live from Sofia, Bulgaria””Exclusive! Interview With Slayer Guitarist Kerry King””2008-02-23: Wiltern, Los Angeles, CA, USA””Slayer's Kerry King To Perform With Megadeth Tonight! - Oct. 21, 2010”originalet”Dave Lombardo - Biography”Slayer Case DismissedArkiveradUltimate Classic Rock: Slayer guitarist Jeff Hanneman dead at 49.”Slayer: "We could never do any thing like Some Kind Of Monster..."””Cannibal Corpse'S Pat O'Brien Will Step In As Slayer'S Guest Guitarist | The Official Slayer Site”originalet”Slayer Wins 'Best Metal' Grammy Award””Slayer Guitarist Jeff Hanneman Dies””Kerrang! Awards 2006 Blog: Kerrang! Hall Of Fame””Kerrang! Awards 2013: Kerrang! Legend”originalet”Metallica, Slayer, Iron Maien Among Winners At Metal Hammer Awards””Metal Hammer Golden Gods Awards””Bullet For My Valentine Booed At Metal Hammer Golden Gods Awards””Metal Storm Awards 2006””Metal Storm Awards 2015””Slayer's Concert History””Slayer - Relationships””Slayer - Releases”Slayers officiella webbplatsSlayer på MusicBrainzOfficiell webbplatsSlayerSlayerr1373445760000 0001 1540 47353068615-5086262726cb13906545x(data)6033143kn20030215029