Latex for-and in equation
I need to write equation as shown in the attached image in LaTex. So far, I have written it like shown below but I can't figure out how to separate (or write properly) the "for" and "and" part of the equation similar to that shown in the image.
begin{equation}
P_d(delta_L)=P_p(delta_S,L_S) for delta_S>delta_{0S} and delta_L<delta_{0L}
end{equation}
I request for help to correct the code. Thank you
math-mode equations
add a comment |
I need to write equation as shown in the attached image in LaTex. So far, I have written it like shown below but I can't figure out how to separate (or write properly) the "for" and "and" part of the equation similar to that shown in the image.
begin{equation}
P_d(delta_L)=P_p(delta_S,L_S) for delta_S>delta_{0S} and delta_L<delta_{0L}
end{equation}
I request for help to correct the code. Thank you
math-mode equations
1
I tend to useqquadtext{for $delta_S>delta_{0S}$ and $delta_L<delta_{0L}$}
, this way the math and condition has proper semantic markup
– daleif
yesterday
add a comment |
I need to write equation as shown in the attached image in LaTex. So far, I have written it like shown below but I can't figure out how to separate (or write properly) the "for" and "and" part of the equation similar to that shown in the image.
begin{equation}
P_d(delta_L)=P_p(delta_S,L_S) for delta_S>delta_{0S} and delta_L<delta_{0L}
end{equation}
I request for help to correct the code. Thank you
math-mode equations
I need to write equation as shown in the attached image in LaTex. So far, I have written it like shown below but I can't figure out how to separate (or write properly) the "for" and "and" part of the equation similar to that shown in the image.
begin{equation}
P_d(delta_L)=P_p(delta_S,L_S) for delta_S>delta_{0S} and delta_L<delta_{0L}
end{equation}
I request for help to correct the code. Thank you
math-mode equations
math-mode equations
edited yesterday
TeXnician
25.9k63390
25.9k63390
asked yesterday
JackJack
4315
4315
1
I tend to useqquadtext{for $delta_S>delta_{0S}$ and $delta_L<delta_{0L}$}
, this way the math and condition has proper semantic markup
– daleif
yesterday
add a comment |
1
I tend to useqquadtext{for $delta_S>delta_{0S}$ and $delta_L<delta_{0L}$}
, this way the math and condition has proper semantic markup
– daleif
yesterday
1
1
I tend to use
qquadtext{for $delta_S>delta_{0S}$ and $delta_L<delta_{0L}$}
, this way the math and condition has proper semantic markup– daleif
yesterday
I tend to use
qquadtext{for $delta_S>delta_{0S}$ and $delta_L<delta_{0L}$}
, this way the math and condition has proper semantic markup– daleif
yesterday
add a comment |
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
You can use align*
.
documentclass{article}
usepackage{amsmath}
begin{document}
begin{align*}
P_d(delta_L) &= P_p(delta_S,L_S)\
&phantom{{}={}}text{for $delta_S>delta_{0S}$ and $delta_L<delta_{0L}$}
end{align*}
end{document}
add a comment |
Numbered...
documentclass{article}
usepackage{amsmath,amssymb}
begin{document}
begin{equation}
begin{aligned}[b]
P_d(delta_L)={}&P_p(delta_S,L_S)\
& text{for } delta_S>delta_{0S} text{ and } delta_L<delta_{0L}
end{aligned}
end{equation}
end{document}
add a comment |
Your picture hints you're using a two-column format. Here's my proposal with multlined
:
documentclass[twocolumn]{article}
usepackage{amsmath,mathtools}
usepackage{newtxtext,newtxmath}
usepackage{lipsum} % for context
begin{document}
lipsum*[3]
begin{equation}
begin{multlined}[b][0.66displaywidth]
P_d(delta_L)=P_p(delta_S,L_S) \
text{for $delta_S>delta_{0S}$ and $delta_L<delta_{0L}$}
end{multlined}
end{equation}
lipsum[4]
end{document}
The lipsum
package is just to provide context. The newtx...
packages are to get Times-like fonts as in your picture.
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "85"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f481391%2flatex-for-and-in-equation%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
You can use align*
.
documentclass{article}
usepackage{amsmath}
begin{document}
begin{align*}
P_d(delta_L) &= P_p(delta_S,L_S)\
&phantom{{}={}}text{for $delta_S>delta_{0S}$ and $delta_L<delta_{0L}$}
end{align*}
end{document}
add a comment |
You can use align*
.
documentclass{article}
usepackage{amsmath}
begin{document}
begin{align*}
P_d(delta_L) &= P_p(delta_S,L_S)\
&phantom{{}={}}text{for $delta_S>delta_{0S}$ and $delta_L<delta_{0L}$}
end{align*}
end{document}
add a comment |
You can use align*
.
documentclass{article}
usepackage{amsmath}
begin{document}
begin{align*}
P_d(delta_L) &= P_p(delta_S,L_S)\
&phantom{{}={}}text{for $delta_S>delta_{0S}$ and $delta_L<delta_{0L}$}
end{align*}
end{document}
You can use align*
.
documentclass{article}
usepackage{amsmath}
begin{document}
begin{align*}
P_d(delta_L) &= P_p(delta_S,L_S)\
&phantom{{}={}}text{for $delta_S>delta_{0S}$ and $delta_L<delta_{0L}$}
end{align*}
end{document}
edited yesterday
answered yesterday
TeXnicianTeXnician
25.9k63390
25.9k63390
add a comment |
add a comment |
Numbered...
documentclass{article}
usepackage{amsmath,amssymb}
begin{document}
begin{equation}
begin{aligned}[b]
P_d(delta_L)={}&P_p(delta_S,L_S)\
& text{for } delta_S>delta_{0S} text{ and } delta_L<delta_{0L}
end{aligned}
end{equation}
end{document}
add a comment |
Numbered...
documentclass{article}
usepackage{amsmath,amssymb}
begin{document}
begin{equation}
begin{aligned}[b]
P_d(delta_L)={}&P_p(delta_S,L_S)\
& text{for } delta_S>delta_{0S} text{ and } delta_L<delta_{0L}
end{aligned}
end{equation}
end{document}
add a comment |
Numbered...
documentclass{article}
usepackage{amsmath,amssymb}
begin{document}
begin{equation}
begin{aligned}[b]
P_d(delta_L)={}&P_p(delta_S,L_S)\
& text{for } delta_S>delta_{0S} text{ and } delta_L<delta_{0L}
end{aligned}
end{equation}
end{document}
Numbered...
documentclass{article}
usepackage{amsmath,amssymb}
begin{document}
begin{equation}
begin{aligned}[b]
P_d(delta_L)={}&P_p(delta_S,L_S)\
& text{for } delta_S>delta_{0S} text{ and } delta_L<delta_{0L}
end{aligned}
end{equation}
end{document}
answered yesterday
Steven B. SegletesSteven B. Segletes
159k9204413
159k9204413
add a comment |
add a comment |
Your picture hints you're using a two-column format. Here's my proposal with multlined
:
documentclass[twocolumn]{article}
usepackage{amsmath,mathtools}
usepackage{newtxtext,newtxmath}
usepackage{lipsum} % for context
begin{document}
lipsum*[3]
begin{equation}
begin{multlined}[b][0.66displaywidth]
P_d(delta_L)=P_p(delta_S,L_S) \
text{for $delta_S>delta_{0S}$ and $delta_L<delta_{0L}$}
end{multlined}
end{equation}
lipsum[4]
end{document}
The lipsum
package is just to provide context. The newtx...
packages are to get Times-like fonts as in your picture.
add a comment |
Your picture hints you're using a two-column format. Here's my proposal with multlined
:
documentclass[twocolumn]{article}
usepackage{amsmath,mathtools}
usepackage{newtxtext,newtxmath}
usepackage{lipsum} % for context
begin{document}
lipsum*[3]
begin{equation}
begin{multlined}[b][0.66displaywidth]
P_d(delta_L)=P_p(delta_S,L_S) \
text{for $delta_S>delta_{0S}$ and $delta_L<delta_{0L}$}
end{multlined}
end{equation}
lipsum[4]
end{document}
The lipsum
package is just to provide context. The newtx...
packages are to get Times-like fonts as in your picture.
add a comment |
Your picture hints you're using a two-column format. Here's my proposal with multlined
:
documentclass[twocolumn]{article}
usepackage{amsmath,mathtools}
usepackage{newtxtext,newtxmath}
usepackage{lipsum} % for context
begin{document}
lipsum*[3]
begin{equation}
begin{multlined}[b][0.66displaywidth]
P_d(delta_L)=P_p(delta_S,L_S) \
text{for $delta_S>delta_{0S}$ and $delta_L<delta_{0L}$}
end{multlined}
end{equation}
lipsum[4]
end{document}
The lipsum
package is just to provide context. The newtx...
packages are to get Times-like fonts as in your picture.
Your picture hints you're using a two-column format. Here's my proposal with multlined
:
documentclass[twocolumn]{article}
usepackage{amsmath,mathtools}
usepackage{newtxtext,newtxmath}
usepackage{lipsum} % for context
begin{document}
lipsum*[3]
begin{equation}
begin{multlined}[b][0.66displaywidth]
P_d(delta_L)=P_p(delta_S,L_S) \
text{for $delta_S>delta_{0S}$ and $delta_L<delta_{0L}$}
end{multlined}
end{equation}
lipsum[4]
end{document}
The lipsum
package is just to provide context. The newtx...
packages are to get Times-like fonts as in your picture.
answered yesterday
egregegreg
729k8819263237
729k8819263237
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to TeX - LaTeX Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f481391%2flatex-for-and-in-equation%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
1
I tend to use
qquadtext{for $delta_S>delta_{0S}$ and $delta_L<delta_{0L}$}
, this way the math and condition has proper semantic markup– daleif
yesterday