How to generate binary array whose elements with values 1 are randomly drawnMatrix and random, weighted assignment of rowsDevising a sparse array ruleAdding two SparseArrays produces zeros in the reported “NonzeroValues”Random Matrix with criteriaHow to find position of non-zero elements in SparseArray without converting to a dense objectGenerating a random network adjacency matrix via an arbitrary average degreeProblems with RandomChoiceGenerating invertible matrix with lines within a given setMatrix expansion and reorganisationmatrix with chosen elements distributed in a random position

How can I, as DM, avoid the Conga Line of Death occurring when implementing some form of flanking rule?

In One Punch Man, is King actually weak?

ContourPlot — How do I color by contour curvature?

Quoting Keynes in a lecture

What happens if I try to grapple an illusory duplicate from the Mirror Image spell?

Has the laser at Magurele, Romania reached a tenth of the Sun's power?

How to leave product feedback on macOS?

Why would five hundred and five be same as one?

How many people need to be born every 8 years to sustain population?

Is there a distance limit for minecart tracks?

If Captain Marvel (MCU) were to have a child with a human male, would the child be human or Kree?

Language involving irrational number is not a CFL

Check if object is null and return null

Make a Bowl of Alphabet Soup

When and why was runway 07/25 at Kai Tak removed?

Giving feedback to someone without sounding prejudiced

How do you justify more code being written by following clean code practices?

Why does a 97 / 92 key piano exist by Bösendorfer?

Is there anyway, I can have two passwords for my wi-fi

How to test the sharpness of a knife?

Alignment of six matrices

How do I prevent inappropriate ads from appearing in my game?

Is there a reason to prefer HFS+ over APFS for disk images in High Sierra and/or Mojave?

Can I say "fingers" when referring to toes?



How to generate binary array whose elements with values 1 are randomly drawn


Matrix and random, weighted assignment of rowsDevising a sparse array ruleAdding two SparseArrays produces zeros in the reported “NonzeroValues”Random Matrix with criteriaHow to find position of non-zero elements in SparseArray without converting to a dense objectGenerating a random network adjacency matrix via an arbitrary average degreeProblems with RandomChoiceGenerating invertible matrix with lines within a given setMatrix expansion and reorganisationmatrix with chosen elements distributed in a random position













4












$begingroup$


I am trying to generate a binary matrix (whose elements are 0 or 1) of dimension 20x20. To do this, I want to supply as input the number of matrix elements that will take value 1. After, I want to draw randomly distinct position of those elements (values 1). I thought of doing this:



n = 20; (*matrix dimension*)
d = 300; (*number of matrix elements that will assume value 1*)
rules = RandomInteger[1, n, d, 2]; (*defines the position of the matrix elements*)
rules2 = Table[rules[[i]] -> 1, i, Length[rules]]; (*applies the list of random positions the value 1*)
s = SparseArray[rules2] (*creates the binary random matrix*)


However, this method is not efficient because it does not create 300 different random positions (some are repeated). For example, the result appears 212 filled matrix elements (many of the positions contains summed values).




SparseArray[<212>,20,20]




I would like to know if anyone could help me solve this problem of generating 300 numbers 1 in random positions in a 20x20 dimension matrix.



Thanks in advance










share|improve this question











$endgroup$
















    4












    $begingroup$


    I am trying to generate a binary matrix (whose elements are 0 or 1) of dimension 20x20. To do this, I want to supply as input the number of matrix elements that will take value 1. After, I want to draw randomly distinct position of those elements (values 1). I thought of doing this:



    n = 20; (*matrix dimension*)
    d = 300; (*number of matrix elements that will assume value 1*)
    rules = RandomInteger[1, n, d, 2]; (*defines the position of the matrix elements*)
    rules2 = Table[rules[[i]] -> 1, i, Length[rules]]; (*applies the list of random positions the value 1*)
    s = SparseArray[rules2] (*creates the binary random matrix*)


    However, this method is not efficient because it does not create 300 different random positions (some are repeated). For example, the result appears 212 filled matrix elements (many of the positions contains summed values).




    SparseArray[<212>,20,20]




    I would like to know if anyone could help me solve this problem of generating 300 numbers 1 in random positions in a 20x20 dimension matrix.



    Thanks in advance










    share|improve this question











    $endgroup$














      4












      4








      4


      1



      $begingroup$


      I am trying to generate a binary matrix (whose elements are 0 or 1) of dimension 20x20. To do this, I want to supply as input the number of matrix elements that will take value 1. After, I want to draw randomly distinct position of those elements (values 1). I thought of doing this:



      n = 20; (*matrix dimension*)
      d = 300; (*number of matrix elements that will assume value 1*)
      rules = RandomInteger[1, n, d, 2]; (*defines the position of the matrix elements*)
      rules2 = Table[rules[[i]] -> 1, i, Length[rules]]; (*applies the list of random positions the value 1*)
      s = SparseArray[rules2] (*creates the binary random matrix*)


      However, this method is not efficient because it does not create 300 different random positions (some are repeated). For example, the result appears 212 filled matrix elements (many of the positions contains summed values).




      SparseArray[<212>,20,20]




      I would like to know if anyone could help me solve this problem of generating 300 numbers 1 in random positions in a 20x20 dimension matrix.



      Thanks in advance










      share|improve this question











      $endgroup$




      I am trying to generate a binary matrix (whose elements are 0 or 1) of dimension 20x20. To do this, I want to supply as input the number of matrix elements that will take value 1. After, I want to draw randomly distinct position of those elements (values 1). I thought of doing this:



      n = 20; (*matrix dimension*)
      d = 300; (*number of matrix elements that will assume value 1*)
      rules = RandomInteger[1, n, d, 2]; (*defines the position of the matrix elements*)
      rules2 = Table[rules[[i]] -> 1, i, Length[rules]]; (*applies the list of random positions the value 1*)
      s = SparseArray[rules2] (*creates the binary random matrix*)


      However, this method is not efficient because it does not create 300 different random positions (some are repeated). For example, the result appears 212 filled matrix elements (many of the positions contains summed values).




      SparseArray[<212>,20,20]




      I would like to know if anyone could help me solve this problem of generating 300 numbers 1 in random positions in a 20x20 dimension matrix.



      Thanks in advance







      matrix random sparse-arrays






      share|improve this question















      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question








      edited Mar 17 at 13:09









      J. M. is slightly pensive

      98.1k10305465




      98.1k10305465










      asked Mar 17 at 12:52









      SACSAC

      1938




      1938




















          5 Answers
          5






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          6












          $begingroup$

          This might work:



          n = 20;
          d = 300;
          s = Join[ConstantArray[1, d], ConstantArray[0, n^2 - d]];
          a = Partition[RandomSample[s], n]

          Total[a, 2]



          300







          share|improve this answer









          $endgroup$




















            6












            $begingroup$

            r = RandomSample[Range[400], 300];
            q = Array[0 &, 400];
            q[[r]] = 1;
            Q = ArrayReshape[q, 20, 20] // MatrixForm


            enter image description here






            share|improve this answer









            $endgroup$












            • $begingroup$
              Quite nice. Here's a shorter variation: ArrayReshape[SparseArray[Transpose[RandomSample[Range[400], 300]] -> 1, 400], 20, 20]
              $endgroup$
              – J. M. is slightly pensive
              Mar 17 at 14:34










            • $begingroup$
              @J. M. Thank you! And I like your version too! Have not been as familiar with SparseArray[] as some of the other commands, because I never really use it. But now I see its benefit here. Ironically, most (75%) of the entries are ones!
              $endgroup$
              – mjw
              Mar 17 at 15:11










            • $begingroup$
              Indeed, it's not actually "sparse" in that sense. So, just turn things around a bit: ArrayReshape[SparseArray[Transpose[RandomSample[Range[400], 100]] -> 0, 400, 1], 20, 20]
              $endgroup$
              – J. M. is slightly pensive
              Mar 17 at 15:27










            • $begingroup$
              Yes! Very much agreed. Even more efficient!
              $endgroup$
              – mjw
              Mar 17 at 15:30


















            3












            $begingroup$

            In a situation where generating all admissible matrix indices can get prohibitive (e.g. the result of Tuples[] having too many elements), here is an approach that generates just the needed nonzero indices:



            (* random k-subset *)
            rs[n_, k_] := Take[PermutationList[RandomPermutation[n]], k]

            BlockRandom[SeedRandom[1023, Method -> "ExtendedCA"]; (* for reproducibility *)
            With[n = 20, p = 300,
            Block[k = 1, idl, id,
            idl = rs[n, 2];
            While[k < p, id = rs[n, 2];
            If[! MemberQ[idl, id], k++; AppendTo[idl, id]]];
            mat = SparseArray[idl -> 1, n, n]]]];


            Check:



            Total[mat, 2]
            300





            share|improve this answer









            $endgroup$




















              3












              $begingroup$

              Here is a variation of JM's comment to mjw's answer that will be much faster when large matrices (e.g., 10^5 by 10^5) are to be created:



              randomBinary[dim_, count_] := ArrayReshape[
              SparseArray[Thread[RandomSample[1;;dim^2, count]->1], dim^2],
              dim, dim
              ]


              The key idea is that one can use Span (e.g., 1;;max) as the first argument of RandomSample. For example:



              mat = randomBinary[10^5, 300]; //RepeatedTiming
              Total[mat, Infinity]



              0.000327, Null



              300




              Of the other answers, only JM's answer will be able to produce a result, and does so about 4 orders of magnitude more slowly.






              share|improve this answer









              $endgroup$




















                2












                $begingroup$

                sa = SparseArray[RandomSample[Tuples[Range@20, 2], 300] -> 1, 20, 20]


                enter image description here



                Total[sa, 2]



                300




                Alternatively, without Tuples:



                a2 = Unitize @ Threshold[RandomReal[1, 20, 20], "LargestValues", 300]

                a3 = Partition[SparseArray[Partition[RandomSample[Range[20^2], 300], 1] -> 1, 20^2], 20]

                a4 = SparseArray[(1 + QuotientRemainder[RandomSample[Range[20^2 - 1], 300], 20]) -> 1,
                20, 20]

                Total[#, 2] & /@ a2, a3, a4



                300, 300, 300







                share|improve this answer











                $endgroup$












                  Your Answer





                  StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
                  return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
                  StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
                  StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
                  );
                  );
                  , "mathjax-editing");

                  StackExchange.ready(function()
                  var channelOptions =
                  tags: "".split(" "),
                  id: "387"
                  ;
                  initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

                  StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
                  // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
                  if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
                  StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
                  createEditor();
                  );

                  else
                  createEditor();

                  );

                  function createEditor()
                  StackExchange.prepareEditor(
                  heartbeatType: 'answer',
                  autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
                  convertImagesToLinks: false,
                  noModals: true,
                  showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
                  reputationToPostImages: null,
                  bindNavPrevention: true,
                  postfix: "",
                  imageUploader:
                  brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
                  contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
                  allowUrls: true
                  ,
                  onDemand: true,
                  discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
                  ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
                  );



                  );













                  draft saved

                  draft discarded


















                  StackExchange.ready(
                  function ()
                  StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmathematica.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f193418%2fhow-to-generate-binary-array-whose-elements-with-values-1-are-randomly-drawn%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                  );

                  Post as a guest















                  Required, but never shown

























                  5 Answers
                  5






                  active

                  oldest

                  votes








                  5 Answers
                  5






                  active

                  oldest

                  votes









                  active

                  oldest

                  votes






                  active

                  oldest

                  votes









                  6












                  $begingroup$

                  This might work:



                  n = 20;
                  d = 300;
                  s = Join[ConstantArray[1, d], ConstantArray[0, n^2 - d]];
                  a = Partition[RandomSample[s], n]

                  Total[a, 2]



                  300







                  share|improve this answer









                  $endgroup$

















                    6












                    $begingroup$

                    This might work:



                    n = 20;
                    d = 300;
                    s = Join[ConstantArray[1, d], ConstantArray[0, n^2 - d]];
                    a = Partition[RandomSample[s], n]

                    Total[a, 2]



                    300







                    share|improve this answer









                    $endgroup$















                      6












                      6








                      6





                      $begingroup$

                      This might work:



                      n = 20;
                      d = 300;
                      s = Join[ConstantArray[1, d], ConstantArray[0, n^2 - d]];
                      a = Partition[RandomSample[s], n]

                      Total[a, 2]



                      300







                      share|improve this answer









                      $endgroup$



                      This might work:



                      n = 20;
                      d = 300;
                      s = Join[ConstantArray[1, d], ConstantArray[0, n^2 - d]];
                      a = Partition[RandomSample[s], n]

                      Total[a, 2]



                      300








                      share|improve this answer












                      share|improve this answer



                      share|improve this answer










                      answered Mar 17 at 12:59









                      Henrik SchumacherHenrik Schumacher

                      57.2k577157




                      57.2k577157





















                          6












                          $begingroup$

                          r = RandomSample[Range[400], 300];
                          q = Array[0 &, 400];
                          q[[r]] = 1;
                          Q = ArrayReshape[q, 20, 20] // MatrixForm


                          enter image description here






                          share|improve this answer









                          $endgroup$












                          • $begingroup$
                            Quite nice. Here's a shorter variation: ArrayReshape[SparseArray[Transpose[RandomSample[Range[400], 300]] -> 1, 400], 20, 20]
                            $endgroup$
                            – J. M. is slightly pensive
                            Mar 17 at 14:34










                          • $begingroup$
                            @J. M. Thank you! And I like your version too! Have not been as familiar with SparseArray[] as some of the other commands, because I never really use it. But now I see its benefit here. Ironically, most (75%) of the entries are ones!
                            $endgroup$
                            – mjw
                            Mar 17 at 15:11










                          • $begingroup$
                            Indeed, it's not actually "sparse" in that sense. So, just turn things around a bit: ArrayReshape[SparseArray[Transpose[RandomSample[Range[400], 100]] -> 0, 400, 1], 20, 20]
                            $endgroup$
                            – J. M. is slightly pensive
                            Mar 17 at 15:27










                          • $begingroup$
                            Yes! Very much agreed. Even more efficient!
                            $endgroup$
                            – mjw
                            Mar 17 at 15:30















                          6












                          $begingroup$

                          r = RandomSample[Range[400], 300];
                          q = Array[0 &, 400];
                          q[[r]] = 1;
                          Q = ArrayReshape[q, 20, 20] // MatrixForm


                          enter image description here






                          share|improve this answer









                          $endgroup$












                          • $begingroup$
                            Quite nice. Here's a shorter variation: ArrayReshape[SparseArray[Transpose[RandomSample[Range[400], 300]] -> 1, 400], 20, 20]
                            $endgroup$
                            – J. M. is slightly pensive
                            Mar 17 at 14:34










                          • $begingroup$
                            @J. M. Thank you! And I like your version too! Have not been as familiar with SparseArray[] as some of the other commands, because I never really use it. But now I see its benefit here. Ironically, most (75%) of the entries are ones!
                            $endgroup$
                            – mjw
                            Mar 17 at 15:11










                          • $begingroup$
                            Indeed, it's not actually "sparse" in that sense. So, just turn things around a bit: ArrayReshape[SparseArray[Transpose[RandomSample[Range[400], 100]] -> 0, 400, 1], 20, 20]
                            $endgroup$
                            – J. M. is slightly pensive
                            Mar 17 at 15:27










                          • $begingroup$
                            Yes! Very much agreed. Even more efficient!
                            $endgroup$
                            – mjw
                            Mar 17 at 15:30













                          6












                          6








                          6





                          $begingroup$

                          r = RandomSample[Range[400], 300];
                          q = Array[0 &, 400];
                          q[[r]] = 1;
                          Q = ArrayReshape[q, 20, 20] // MatrixForm


                          enter image description here






                          share|improve this answer









                          $endgroup$



                          r = RandomSample[Range[400], 300];
                          q = Array[0 &, 400];
                          q[[r]] = 1;
                          Q = ArrayReshape[q, 20, 20] // MatrixForm


                          enter image description here







                          share|improve this answer












                          share|improve this answer



                          share|improve this answer










                          answered Mar 17 at 14:27









                          mjwmjw

                          8859




                          8859











                          • $begingroup$
                            Quite nice. Here's a shorter variation: ArrayReshape[SparseArray[Transpose[RandomSample[Range[400], 300]] -> 1, 400], 20, 20]
                            $endgroup$
                            – J. M. is slightly pensive
                            Mar 17 at 14:34










                          • $begingroup$
                            @J. M. Thank you! And I like your version too! Have not been as familiar with SparseArray[] as some of the other commands, because I never really use it. But now I see its benefit here. Ironically, most (75%) of the entries are ones!
                            $endgroup$
                            – mjw
                            Mar 17 at 15:11










                          • $begingroup$
                            Indeed, it's not actually "sparse" in that sense. So, just turn things around a bit: ArrayReshape[SparseArray[Transpose[RandomSample[Range[400], 100]] -> 0, 400, 1], 20, 20]
                            $endgroup$
                            – J. M. is slightly pensive
                            Mar 17 at 15:27










                          • $begingroup$
                            Yes! Very much agreed. Even more efficient!
                            $endgroup$
                            – mjw
                            Mar 17 at 15:30
















                          • $begingroup$
                            Quite nice. Here's a shorter variation: ArrayReshape[SparseArray[Transpose[RandomSample[Range[400], 300]] -> 1, 400], 20, 20]
                            $endgroup$
                            – J. M. is slightly pensive
                            Mar 17 at 14:34










                          • $begingroup$
                            @J. M. Thank you! And I like your version too! Have not been as familiar with SparseArray[] as some of the other commands, because I never really use it. But now I see its benefit here. Ironically, most (75%) of the entries are ones!
                            $endgroup$
                            – mjw
                            Mar 17 at 15:11










                          • $begingroup$
                            Indeed, it's not actually "sparse" in that sense. So, just turn things around a bit: ArrayReshape[SparseArray[Transpose[RandomSample[Range[400], 100]] -> 0, 400, 1], 20, 20]
                            $endgroup$
                            – J. M. is slightly pensive
                            Mar 17 at 15:27










                          • $begingroup$
                            Yes! Very much agreed. Even more efficient!
                            $endgroup$
                            – mjw
                            Mar 17 at 15:30















                          $begingroup$
                          Quite nice. Here's a shorter variation: ArrayReshape[SparseArray[Transpose[RandomSample[Range[400], 300]] -> 1, 400], 20, 20]
                          $endgroup$
                          – J. M. is slightly pensive
                          Mar 17 at 14:34




                          $begingroup$
                          Quite nice. Here's a shorter variation: ArrayReshape[SparseArray[Transpose[RandomSample[Range[400], 300]] -> 1, 400], 20, 20]
                          $endgroup$
                          – J. M. is slightly pensive
                          Mar 17 at 14:34












                          $begingroup$
                          @J. M. Thank you! And I like your version too! Have not been as familiar with SparseArray[] as some of the other commands, because I never really use it. But now I see its benefit here. Ironically, most (75%) of the entries are ones!
                          $endgroup$
                          – mjw
                          Mar 17 at 15:11




                          $begingroup$
                          @J. M. Thank you! And I like your version too! Have not been as familiar with SparseArray[] as some of the other commands, because I never really use it. But now I see its benefit here. Ironically, most (75%) of the entries are ones!
                          $endgroup$
                          – mjw
                          Mar 17 at 15:11












                          $begingroup$
                          Indeed, it's not actually "sparse" in that sense. So, just turn things around a bit: ArrayReshape[SparseArray[Transpose[RandomSample[Range[400], 100]] -> 0, 400, 1], 20, 20]
                          $endgroup$
                          – J. M. is slightly pensive
                          Mar 17 at 15:27




                          $begingroup$
                          Indeed, it's not actually "sparse" in that sense. So, just turn things around a bit: ArrayReshape[SparseArray[Transpose[RandomSample[Range[400], 100]] -> 0, 400, 1], 20, 20]
                          $endgroup$
                          – J. M. is slightly pensive
                          Mar 17 at 15:27












                          $begingroup$
                          Yes! Very much agreed. Even more efficient!
                          $endgroup$
                          – mjw
                          Mar 17 at 15:30




                          $begingroup$
                          Yes! Very much agreed. Even more efficient!
                          $endgroup$
                          – mjw
                          Mar 17 at 15:30











                          3












                          $begingroup$

                          In a situation where generating all admissible matrix indices can get prohibitive (e.g. the result of Tuples[] having too many elements), here is an approach that generates just the needed nonzero indices:



                          (* random k-subset *)
                          rs[n_, k_] := Take[PermutationList[RandomPermutation[n]], k]

                          BlockRandom[SeedRandom[1023, Method -> "ExtendedCA"]; (* for reproducibility *)
                          With[n = 20, p = 300,
                          Block[k = 1, idl, id,
                          idl = rs[n, 2];
                          While[k < p, id = rs[n, 2];
                          If[! MemberQ[idl, id], k++; AppendTo[idl, id]]];
                          mat = SparseArray[idl -> 1, n, n]]]];


                          Check:



                          Total[mat, 2]
                          300





                          share|improve this answer









                          $endgroup$

















                            3












                            $begingroup$

                            In a situation where generating all admissible matrix indices can get prohibitive (e.g. the result of Tuples[] having too many elements), here is an approach that generates just the needed nonzero indices:



                            (* random k-subset *)
                            rs[n_, k_] := Take[PermutationList[RandomPermutation[n]], k]

                            BlockRandom[SeedRandom[1023, Method -> "ExtendedCA"]; (* for reproducibility *)
                            With[n = 20, p = 300,
                            Block[k = 1, idl, id,
                            idl = rs[n, 2];
                            While[k < p, id = rs[n, 2];
                            If[! MemberQ[idl, id], k++; AppendTo[idl, id]]];
                            mat = SparseArray[idl -> 1, n, n]]]];


                            Check:



                            Total[mat, 2]
                            300





                            share|improve this answer









                            $endgroup$















                              3












                              3








                              3





                              $begingroup$

                              In a situation where generating all admissible matrix indices can get prohibitive (e.g. the result of Tuples[] having too many elements), here is an approach that generates just the needed nonzero indices:



                              (* random k-subset *)
                              rs[n_, k_] := Take[PermutationList[RandomPermutation[n]], k]

                              BlockRandom[SeedRandom[1023, Method -> "ExtendedCA"]; (* for reproducibility *)
                              With[n = 20, p = 300,
                              Block[k = 1, idl, id,
                              idl = rs[n, 2];
                              While[k < p, id = rs[n, 2];
                              If[! MemberQ[idl, id], k++; AppendTo[idl, id]]];
                              mat = SparseArray[idl -> 1, n, n]]]];


                              Check:



                              Total[mat, 2]
                              300





                              share|improve this answer









                              $endgroup$



                              In a situation where generating all admissible matrix indices can get prohibitive (e.g. the result of Tuples[] having too many elements), here is an approach that generates just the needed nonzero indices:



                              (* random k-subset *)
                              rs[n_, k_] := Take[PermutationList[RandomPermutation[n]], k]

                              BlockRandom[SeedRandom[1023, Method -> "ExtendedCA"]; (* for reproducibility *)
                              With[n = 20, p = 300,
                              Block[k = 1, idl, id,
                              idl = rs[n, 2];
                              While[k < p, id = rs[n, 2];
                              If[! MemberQ[idl, id], k++; AppendTo[idl, id]]];
                              mat = SparseArray[idl -> 1, n, n]]]];


                              Check:



                              Total[mat, 2]
                              300






                              share|improve this answer












                              share|improve this answer



                              share|improve this answer










                              answered Mar 17 at 13:23









                              J. M. is slightly pensiveJ. M. is slightly pensive

                              98.1k10305465




                              98.1k10305465





















                                  3












                                  $begingroup$

                                  Here is a variation of JM's comment to mjw's answer that will be much faster when large matrices (e.g., 10^5 by 10^5) are to be created:



                                  randomBinary[dim_, count_] := ArrayReshape[
                                  SparseArray[Thread[RandomSample[1;;dim^2, count]->1], dim^2],
                                  dim, dim
                                  ]


                                  The key idea is that one can use Span (e.g., 1;;max) as the first argument of RandomSample. For example:



                                  mat = randomBinary[10^5, 300]; //RepeatedTiming
                                  Total[mat, Infinity]



                                  0.000327, Null



                                  300




                                  Of the other answers, only JM's answer will be able to produce a result, and does so about 4 orders of magnitude more slowly.






                                  share|improve this answer









                                  $endgroup$

















                                    3












                                    $begingroup$

                                    Here is a variation of JM's comment to mjw's answer that will be much faster when large matrices (e.g., 10^5 by 10^5) are to be created:



                                    randomBinary[dim_, count_] := ArrayReshape[
                                    SparseArray[Thread[RandomSample[1;;dim^2, count]->1], dim^2],
                                    dim, dim
                                    ]


                                    The key idea is that one can use Span (e.g., 1;;max) as the first argument of RandomSample. For example:



                                    mat = randomBinary[10^5, 300]; //RepeatedTiming
                                    Total[mat, Infinity]



                                    0.000327, Null



                                    300




                                    Of the other answers, only JM's answer will be able to produce a result, and does so about 4 orders of magnitude more slowly.






                                    share|improve this answer









                                    $endgroup$















                                      3












                                      3








                                      3





                                      $begingroup$

                                      Here is a variation of JM's comment to mjw's answer that will be much faster when large matrices (e.g., 10^5 by 10^5) are to be created:



                                      randomBinary[dim_, count_] := ArrayReshape[
                                      SparseArray[Thread[RandomSample[1;;dim^2, count]->1], dim^2],
                                      dim, dim
                                      ]


                                      The key idea is that one can use Span (e.g., 1;;max) as the first argument of RandomSample. For example:



                                      mat = randomBinary[10^5, 300]; //RepeatedTiming
                                      Total[mat, Infinity]



                                      0.000327, Null



                                      300




                                      Of the other answers, only JM's answer will be able to produce a result, and does so about 4 orders of magnitude more slowly.






                                      share|improve this answer









                                      $endgroup$



                                      Here is a variation of JM's comment to mjw's answer that will be much faster when large matrices (e.g., 10^5 by 10^5) are to be created:



                                      randomBinary[dim_, count_] := ArrayReshape[
                                      SparseArray[Thread[RandomSample[1;;dim^2, count]->1], dim^2],
                                      dim, dim
                                      ]


                                      The key idea is that one can use Span (e.g., 1;;max) as the first argument of RandomSample. For example:



                                      mat = randomBinary[10^5, 300]; //RepeatedTiming
                                      Total[mat, Infinity]



                                      0.000327, Null



                                      300




                                      Of the other answers, only JM's answer will be able to produce a result, and does so about 4 orders of magnitude more slowly.







                                      share|improve this answer












                                      share|improve this answer



                                      share|improve this answer










                                      answered Mar 17 at 19:16









                                      Carl WollCarl Woll

                                      70.9k394184




                                      70.9k394184





















                                          2












                                          $begingroup$

                                          sa = SparseArray[RandomSample[Tuples[Range@20, 2], 300] -> 1, 20, 20]


                                          enter image description here



                                          Total[sa, 2]



                                          300




                                          Alternatively, without Tuples:



                                          a2 = Unitize @ Threshold[RandomReal[1, 20, 20], "LargestValues", 300]

                                          a3 = Partition[SparseArray[Partition[RandomSample[Range[20^2], 300], 1] -> 1, 20^2], 20]

                                          a4 = SparseArray[(1 + QuotientRemainder[RandomSample[Range[20^2 - 1], 300], 20]) -> 1,
                                          20, 20]

                                          Total[#, 2] & /@ a2, a3, a4



                                          300, 300, 300







                                          share|improve this answer











                                          $endgroup$

















                                            2












                                            $begingroup$

                                            sa = SparseArray[RandomSample[Tuples[Range@20, 2], 300] -> 1, 20, 20]


                                            enter image description here



                                            Total[sa, 2]



                                            300




                                            Alternatively, without Tuples:



                                            a2 = Unitize @ Threshold[RandomReal[1, 20, 20], "LargestValues", 300]

                                            a3 = Partition[SparseArray[Partition[RandomSample[Range[20^2], 300], 1] -> 1, 20^2], 20]

                                            a4 = SparseArray[(1 + QuotientRemainder[RandomSample[Range[20^2 - 1], 300], 20]) -> 1,
                                            20, 20]

                                            Total[#, 2] & /@ a2, a3, a4



                                            300, 300, 300







                                            share|improve this answer











                                            $endgroup$















                                              2












                                              2








                                              2





                                              $begingroup$

                                              sa = SparseArray[RandomSample[Tuples[Range@20, 2], 300] -> 1, 20, 20]


                                              enter image description here



                                              Total[sa, 2]



                                              300




                                              Alternatively, without Tuples:



                                              a2 = Unitize @ Threshold[RandomReal[1, 20, 20], "LargestValues", 300]

                                              a3 = Partition[SparseArray[Partition[RandomSample[Range[20^2], 300], 1] -> 1, 20^2], 20]

                                              a4 = SparseArray[(1 + QuotientRemainder[RandomSample[Range[20^2 - 1], 300], 20]) -> 1,
                                              20, 20]

                                              Total[#, 2] & /@ a2, a3, a4



                                              300, 300, 300







                                              share|improve this answer











                                              $endgroup$



                                              sa = SparseArray[RandomSample[Tuples[Range@20, 2], 300] -> 1, 20, 20]


                                              enter image description here



                                              Total[sa, 2]



                                              300




                                              Alternatively, without Tuples:



                                              a2 = Unitize @ Threshold[RandomReal[1, 20, 20], "LargestValues", 300]

                                              a3 = Partition[SparseArray[Partition[RandomSample[Range[20^2], 300], 1] -> 1, 20^2], 20]

                                              a4 = SparseArray[(1 + QuotientRemainder[RandomSample[Range[20^2 - 1], 300], 20]) -> 1,
                                              20, 20]

                                              Total[#, 2] & /@ a2, a3, a4



                                              300, 300, 300








                                              share|improve this answer














                                              share|improve this answer



                                              share|improve this answer








                                              edited Mar 17 at 19:42

























                                              answered Mar 17 at 13:03









                                              kglrkglr

                                              189k10206424




                                              189k10206424



























                                                  draft saved

                                                  draft discarded
















































                                                  Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematica Stack Exchange!


                                                  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                                                  But avoid


                                                  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                                                  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

                                                  Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                                                  To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                                                  draft saved


                                                  draft discarded














                                                  StackExchange.ready(
                                                  function ()
                                                  StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmathematica.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f193418%2fhow-to-generate-binary-array-whose-elements-with-values-1-are-randomly-drawn%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                                                  );

                                                  Post as a guest















                                                  Required, but never shown





















































                                                  Required, but never shown














                                                  Required, but never shown












                                                  Required, but never shown







                                                  Required, but never shown

































                                                  Required, but never shown














                                                  Required, but never shown












                                                  Required, but never shown







                                                  Required, but never shown







                                                  Popular posts from this blog

                                                  Færeyskur hestur Heimild | Tengill | Tilvísanir | LeiðsagnarvalRossið - síða um færeyska hrossið á færeyskuGott ár hjá færeyska hestinum

                                                  He _____ here since 1970 . Answer needed [closed]What does “since he was so high” mean?Meaning of “catch birds for”?How do I ensure “since” takes the meaning I want?“Who cares here” meaningWhat does “right round toward” mean?the time tense (had now been detected)What does the phrase “ring around the roses” mean here?Correct usage of “visited upon”Meaning of “foiled rail sabotage bid”It was the third time I had gone to Rome or It is the third time I had been to Rome

                                                  Slayer Innehåll Historia | Stil, komposition och lyrik | Bandets betydelse och framgångar | Sidoprojekt och samarbeten | Kontroverser | Medlemmar | Utmärkelser och nomineringar | Turnéer och festivaler | Diskografi | Referenser | Externa länkar | Navigeringsmenywww.slayer.net”Metal Massacre vol. 1””Metal Massacre vol. 3””Metal Massacre Volume III””Show No Mercy””Haunting the Chapel””Live Undead””Hell Awaits””Reign in Blood””Reign in Blood””Gold & Platinum – Reign in Blood””Golden Gods Awards Winners”originalet”Kerrang! Hall Of Fame””Slayer Looks Back On 37-Year Career In New Video Series: Part Two””South of Heaven””Gold & Platinum – South of Heaven””Seasons in the Abyss””Gold & Platinum - Seasons in the Abyss””Divine Intervention””Divine Intervention - Release group by Slayer””Gold & Platinum - Divine Intervention””Live Intrusion””Undisputed Attitude””Abolish Government/Superficial Love””Release “Slatanic Slaughter: A Tribute to Slayer” by Various Artists””Diabolus in Musica””Soundtrack to the Apocalypse””God Hates Us All””Systematic - Relationships””War at the Warfield””Gold & Platinum - War at the Warfield””Soundtrack to the Apocalypse””Gold & Platinum - Still Reigning””Metallica, Slayer, Iron Mauden Among Winners At Metal Hammer Awards””Eternal Pyre””Eternal Pyre - Slayer release group””Eternal Pyre””Metal Storm Awards 2006””Kerrang! Hall Of Fame””Slayer Wins 'Best Metal' Grammy Award””Slayer Guitarist Jeff Hanneman Dies””Bullet-For My Valentine booed at Metal Hammer Golden Gods Awards””Unholy Aliance””The End Of Slayer?””Slayer: We Could Thrash Out Two More Albums If We're Fast Enough...””'The Unholy Alliance: Chapter III' UK Dates Added”originalet”Megadeth And Slayer To Co-Headline 'Canadian Carnage' Trek”originalet”World Painted Blood””Release “World Painted Blood” by Slayer””Metallica Heading To Cinemas””Slayer, Megadeth To Join Forces For 'European Carnage' Tour - Dec. 18, 2010”originalet”Slayer's Hanneman Contracts Acute Infection; Band To Bring In Guest Guitarist””Cannibal Corpse's Pat O'Brien Will Step In As Slayer's Guest Guitarist”originalet”Slayer’s Jeff Hanneman Dead at 49””Dave Lombardo Says He Made Only $67,000 In 2011 While Touring With Slayer””Slayer: We Do Not Agree With Dave Lombardo's Substance Or Timeline Of Events””Slayer Welcomes Drummer Paul Bostaph Back To The Fold””Slayer Hope to Unveil Never-Before-Heard Jeff Hanneman Material on Next Album””Slayer Debut New Song 'Implode' During Surprise Golden Gods Appearance””Release group Repentless by Slayer””Repentless - Slayer - Credits””Slayer””Metal Storm Awards 2015””Slayer - to release comic book "Repentless #1"””Slayer To Release 'Repentless' 6.66" Vinyl Box Set””BREAKING NEWS: Slayer Announce Farewell Tour””Slayer Recruit Lamb of God, Anthrax, Behemoth + Testament for Final Tour””Slayer lägger ner efter 37 år””Slayer Announces Second North American Leg Of 'Final' Tour””Final World Tour””Slayer Announces Final European Tour With Lamb of God, Anthrax And Obituary””Slayer To Tour Europe With Lamb of God, Anthrax And Obituary””Slayer To Play 'Last French Show Ever' At Next Year's Hellfst””Slayer's Final World Tour Will Extend Into 2019””Death Angel's Rob Cavestany On Slayer's 'Farewell' Tour: 'Some Of Us Could See This Coming'””Testament Has No Plans To Retire Anytime Soon, Says Chuck Billy””Anthrax's Scott Ian On Slayer's 'Farewell' Tour Plans: 'I Was Surprised And I Wasn't Surprised'””Slayer””Slayer's Morbid Schlock””Review/Rock; For Slayer, the Mania Is the Message””Slayer - Biography””Slayer - Reign In Blood”originalet”Dave Lombardo””An exclusive oral history of Slayer”originalet”Exclusive! Interview With Slayer Guitarist Jeff Hanneman”originalet”Thinking Out Loud: Slayer's Kerry King on hair metal, Satan and being polite””Slayer Lyrics””Slayer - Biography””Most influential artists for extreme metal music””Slayer - Reign in Blood””Slayer guitarist Jeff Hanneman dies aged 49””Slatanic Slaughter: A Tribute to Slayer””Gateway to Hell: A Tribute to Slayer””Covered In Blood””Slayer: The Origins of Thrash in San Francisco, CA.””Why They Rule - #6 Slayer”originalet”Guitar World's 100 Greatest Heavy Metal Guitarists Of All Time”originalet”The fans have spoken: Slayer comes out on top in readers' polls”originalet”Tribute to Jeff Hanneman (1964-2013)””Lamb Of God Frontman: We Sound Like A Slayer Rip-Off””BEHEMOTH Frontman Pays Tribute To SLAYER's JEFF HANNEMAN””Slayer, Hatebreed Doing Double Duty On This Year's Ozzfest””System of a Down””Lacuna Coil’s Andrea Ferro Talks Influences, Skateboarding, Band Origins + More””Slayer - Reign in Blood””Into The Lungs of Hell””Slayer rules - en utställning om fans””Slayer and Their Fans Slashed Through a No-Holds-Barred Night at Gas Monkey””Home””Slayer””Gold & Platinum - The Big 4 Live from Sofia, Bulgaria””Exclusive! Interview With Slayer Guitarist Kerry King””2008-02-23: Wiltern, Los Angeles, CA, USA””Slayer's Kerry King To Perform With Megadeth Tonight! - Oct. 21, 2010”originalet”Dave Lombardo - Biography”Slayer Case DismissedArkiveradUltimate Classic Rock: Slayer guitarist Jeff Hanneman dead at 49.”Slayer: "We could never do any thing like Some Kind Of Monster..."””Cannibal Corpse'S Pat O'Brien Will Step In As Slayer'S Guest Guitarist | The Official Slayer Site”originalet”Slayer Wins 'Best Metal' Grammy Award””Slayer Guitarist Jeff Hanneman Dies””Kerrang! Awards 2006 Blog: Kerrang! Hall Of Fame””Kerrang! Awards 2013: Kerrang! Legend”originalet”Metallica, Slayer, Iron Maien Among Winners At Metal Hammer Awards””Metal Hammer Golden Gods Awards””Bullet For My Valentine Booed At Metal Hammer Golden Gods Awards””Metal Storm Awards 2006””Metal Storm Awards 2015””Slayer's Concert History””Slayer - Relationships””Slayer - Releases”Slayers officiella webbplatsSlayer på MusicBrainzOfficiell webbplatsSlayerSlayerr1373445760000 0001 1540 47353068615-5086262726cb13906545x(data)6033143kn20030215029