pipe commands inside find -exec?2019 Community Moderator Electionmissing argument to find -execHow to find first match in multiple filesHow does this find command using “find … -exec sh -c '…' sh +” work?Problem combining -or and -exec with find commandConvert order for find … -execHaving issues with FIND commands pruning directoriesCorrect location for piping and redirecting output in find -exec?find -exec ; economyTrying to add multiple grep commands within an execHow to rename a file to have the same name and extension as another file in same directory

What the heck is gets(stdin) on site coderbyte?

Why can't the Brexit deadlock in the UK parliament be solved with a plurality vote?

What is this high flying aircraft over Pennsylvania?

How to make a list of partial sums using forEach

Why does a 97 / 92 key piano exist by Bösendorfer?

How do you justify more code being written by following clean code practices?

Is there a reason to prefer HFS+ over APFS for disk images in High Sierra and/or Mojave?

Quoting Keynes in a lecture

Do you waste sorcery points if you try to apply metamagic to a spell from a scroll but fail to cast it?

How to write Quadratic equation with negative coefficient

Why is the Sun approximated as a black body at ~ 5800 K?

Personal or impersonal in a technical resume

Limit max CPU usage SQL SERVER with WSRM

Why would five hundred and five be same as one?

Given this phrasing in the lease, when should I pay my rent?

When is "ei" a diphthong?

Showing mass murder in a kid's book

Are Captain Marvel's powers affected by Thanos breaking the Tesseract and claiming the stone?

Did I make a mistake by ccing email to boss to others?

How to get directions in deep space?

Does Doodling or Improvising on the Piano Have Any Benefits?

Why do Radio Buttons not fill the entire outer circle?

Would a primitive species be able to learn English from reading books alone?

Pre-Employment Background Check With Consent For Future Checks



pipe commands inside find -exec?



2019 Community Moderator Electionmissing argument to find -execHow to find first match in multiple filesHow does this find command using “find … -exec sh -c '…' sh +” work?Problem combining -or and -exec with find commandConvert order for find … -execHaving issues with FIND commands pruning directoriesCorrect location for piping and redirecting output in find -exec?find -exec ; economyTrying to add multiple grep commands within an execHow to rename a file to have the same name and extension as another file in same directory










4















Let's suppose I want to find all .txt files and search for some string. I would do:



find ./ -type f -name "*.txt" -exec egrep -iH 'something' '' ;


What if I want to do a more complex filtering, like this:



egrep something file.txt | egrep somethingelse | egrep other


Inside find -exec? (or similar)



Please keep in mind that I'm searching for a solution that I could easily type when I need it. I know that this could be done with a few lines using a shell script, but that isn't what I'm looking for.










share|improve this question









New contributor




1nt3rn3t is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
























    4















    Let's suppose I want to find all .txt files and search for some string. I would do:



    find ./ -type f -name "*.txt" -exec egrep -iH 'something' '' ;


    What if I want to do a more complex filtering, like this:



    egrep something file.txt | egrep somethingelse | egrep other


    Inside find -exec? (or similar)



    Please keep in mind that I'm searching for a solution that I could easily type when I need it. I know that this could be done with a few lines using a shell script, but that isn't what I'm looking for.










    share|improve this question









    New contributor




    1nt3rn3t is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
    Check out our Code of Conduct.






















      4












      4








      4








      Let's suppose I want to find all .txt files and search for some string. I would do:



      find ./ -type f -name "*.txt" -exec egrep -iH 'something' '' ;


      What if I want to do a more complex filtering, like this:



      egrep something file.txt | egrep somethingelse | egrep other


      Inside find -exec? (or similar)



      Please keep in mind that I'm searching for a solution that I could easily type when I need it. I know that this could be done with a few lines using a shell script, but that isn't what I'm looking for.










      share|improve this question









      New contributor




      1nt3rn3t is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.












      Let's suppose I want to find all .txt files and search for some string. I would do:



      find ./ -type f -name "*.txt" -exec egrep -iH 'something' '' ;


      What if I want to do a more complex filtering, like this:



      egrep something file.txt | egrep somethingelse | egrep other


      Inside find -exec? (or similar)



      Please keep in mind that I'm searching for a solution that I could easily type when I need it. I know that this could be done with a few lines using a shell script, but that isn't what I'm looking for.







      shell find pipe






      share|improve this question









      New contributor




      1nt3rn3t is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.











      share|improve this question









      New contributor




      1nt3rn3t is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.









      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question








      edited 2 days ago









      terdon

      132k32262441




      132k32262441






      New contributor




      1nt3rn3t is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.









      asked 2 days ago









      1nt3rn3t1nt3rn3t

      232




      232




      New contributor




      1nt3rn3t is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.





      New contributor





      1nt3rn3t is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.






      1nt3rn3t is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.




















          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          9














          If you must do it from within find, you need to call a shell:



          find ./ -type f -name "*.txt" -exec sh -c 'grep -EiH something "$1" | grep -E somethingelse | grep -E other' sh ;


          Other alternatives include using xargs instead:



          find ./ -type f -name "*.txt" | 
          xargs -I grep -EiH something |
          grep -EiH somethingelse |
          grep -EiH other


          Or, much safer for arbitrary filenames (assuming your find supports -print0):



          find ./ -type f -name "*.txt" -print0 | 
          xargs -0 grep -EiH something |
          grep -Ei somethingelse |
          grep -Ei other


          Or, you could just use a shell loop instead:



          find ./ -type f -name "*.txt" -print0 | 
          while IFS= read -d '' file; do
          grep -Ei something "$file" |
          grep -Ei somethingelse |
          grep -Ei other
          done





          share|improve this answer

























          • The first one is exactly what I was looking for. Extremely simple and small enough to type depending on my needs. Thanks.

            – 1nt3rn3t
            2 days ago






          • 1





            ... and xargs could also be used as xargs -I sh -c '...' sh , if one wanted to (it makes it possible to run parallel jobs with -P if one wanted to).

            – Kusalananda
            2 days ago


















          1














          Edit: This answer is not preferred, but is left here for comparison and illustration of potentially dangerous pitfalls in bash scripting.




          You can put bash (or another shell) as your -exec command:



          find -type -f -name "*.txt" -exec bash -c 'egrep -iH something "" | egrep somethingelse | egrep other' ;


          One of the downsides of doing it this way is that it creates more potential for nested quoting issues as your commands get more complex. If you want to avoid that, you can break it out into a for-loop:



          for i in $(find -type -f -name "*.txt"); do
          if egrep -iH something "$i" | egrep somethingelse | egrep other; then
          echo "Found something: $i"
          fi
          done





          share|improve this answer










          New contributor




          trobinson is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
          Check out our Code of Conduct.















          • 1





            The first one is exactly what I was looking for. Extremely simple and small enough to type depending on my needs. Thanks.

            – 1nt3rn3t
            2 days ago






          • 1





            That for loop is a very bad idea.Also known as bash pitfall #1.

            – terdon
            2 days ago






          • 1





            This "" in your first command may even lead to code injection. Imagine you got files from me and there's a file literally named " & rm -rf ~ & : ".txt. Luckily for you -type -f is invalid, it just saved your home directory. Fix the typo and try again. :) terdon did it right: find … -exec sh -c '… "$1" …' foo ;.

            – Kamil Maciorowski
            2 days ago











          • Thanks for the information! Yeah, the -type -f is a typo I make constantly when using find, and I didn't notice it in my answer. Whoops. terdon's answer is better, but I'll leave this for comparative purposes.

            – trobinson
            2 days ago











          • @terdon: tx for referencing the mywiki.wooledge.org page. It's nice to have a bunch of GPs neatly summarized in one place.

            – Cbhihe
            yesterday










          Your Answer








          StackExchange.ready(function()
          var channelOptions =
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "106"
          ;
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
          createEditor();
          );

          else
          createEditor();

          );

          function createEditor()
          StackExchange.prepareEditor(
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: false,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: null,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader:
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          ,
          onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          );



          );






          1nt3rn3t is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.









          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2funix.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f507023%2fpipe-commands-inside-find-exec%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes








          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes









          9














          If you must do it from within find, you need to call a shell:



          find ./ -type f -name "*.txt" -exec sh -c 'grep -EiH something "$1" | grep -E somethingelse | grep -E other' sh ;


          Other alternatives include using xargs instead:



          find ./ -type f -name "*.txt" | 
          xargs -I grep -EiH something |
          grep -EiH somethingelse |
          grep -EiH other


          Or, much safer for arbitrary filenames (assuming your find supports -print0):



          find ./ -type f -name "*.txt" -print0 | 
          xargs -0 grep -EiH something |
          grep -Ei somethingelse |
          grep -Ei other


          Or, you could just use a shell loop instead:



          find ./ -type f -name "*.txt" -print0 | 
          while IFS= read -d '' file; do
          grep -Ei something "$file" |
          grep -Ei somethingelse |
          grep -Ei other
          done





          share|improve this answer

























          • The first one is exactly what I was looking for. Extremely simple and small enough to type depending on my needs. Thanks.

            – 1nt3rn3t
            2 days ago






          • 1





            ... and xargs could also be used as xargs -I sh -c '...' sh , if one wanted to (it makes it possible to run parallel jobs with -P if one wanted to).

            – Kusalananda
            2 days ago















          9














          If you must do it from within find, you need to call a shell:



          find ./ -type f -name "*.txt" -exec sh -c 'grep -EiH something "$1" | grep -E somethingelse | grep -E other' sh ;


          Other alternatives include using xargs instead:



          find ./ -type f -name "*.txt" | 
          xargs -I grep -EiH something |
          grep -EiH somethingelse |
          grep -EiH other


          Or, much safer for arbitrary filenames (assuming your find supports -print0):



          find ./ -type f -name "*.txt" -print0 | 
          xargs -0 grep -EiH something |
          grep -Ei somethingelse |
          grep -Ei other


          Or, you could just use a shell loop instead:



          find ./ -type f -name "*.txt" -print0 | 
          while IFS= read -d '' file; do
          grep -Ei something "$file" |
          grep -Ei somethingelse |
          grep -Ei other
          done





          share|improve this answer

























          • The first one is exactly what I was looking for. Extremely simple and small enough to type depending on my needs. Thanks.

            – 1nt3rn3t
            2 days ago






          • 1





            ... and xargs could also be used as xargs -I sh -c '...' sh , if one wanted to (it makes it possible to run parallel jobs with -P if one wanted to).

            – Kusalananda
            2 days ago













          9












          9








          9







          If you must do it from within find, you need to call a shell:



          find ./ -type f -name "*.txt" -exec sh -c 'grep -EiH something "$1" | grep -E somethingelse | grep -E other' sh ;


          Other alternatives include using xargs instead:



          find ./ -type f -name "*.txt" | 
          xargs -I grep -EiH something |
          grep -EiH somethingelse |
          grep -EiH other


          Or, much safer for arbitrary filenames (assuming your find supports -print0):



          find ./ -type f -name "*.txt" -print0 | 
          xargs -0 grep -EiH something |
          grep -Ei somethingelse |
          grep -Ei other


          Or, you could just use a shell loop instead:



          find ./ -type f -name "*.txt" -print0 | 
          while IFS= read -d '' file; do
          grep -Ei something "$file" |
          grep -Ei somethingelse |
          grep -Ei other
          done





          share|improve this answer















          If you must do it from within find, you need to call a shell:



          find ./ -type f -name "*.txt" -exec sh -c 'grep -EiH something "$1" | grep -E somethingelse | grep -E other' sh ;


          Other alternatives include using xargs instead:



          find ./ -type f -name "*.txt" | 
          xargs -I grep -EiH something |
          grep -EiH somethingelse |
          grep -EiH other


          Or, much safer for arbitrary filenames (assuming your find supports -print0):



          find ./ -type f -name "*.txt" -print0 | 
          xargs -0 grep -EiH something |
          grep -Ei somethingelse |
          grep -Ei other


          Or, you could just use a shell loop instead:



          find ./ -type f -name "*.txt" -print0 | 
          while IFS= read -d '' file; do
          grep -Ei something "$file" |
          grep -Ei somethingelse |
          grep -Ei other
          done






          share|improve this answer














          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer








          edited 2 days ago









          Kusalananda

          136k17257426




          136k17257426










          answered 2 days ago









          terdonterdon

          132k32262441




          132k32262441












          • The first one is exactly what I was looking for. Extremely simple and small enough to type depending on my needs. Thanks.

            – 1nt3rn3t
            2 days ago






          • 1





            ... and xargs could also be used as xargs -I sh -c '...' sh , if one wanted to (it makes it possible to run parallel jobs with -P if one wanted to).

            – Kusalananda
            2 days ago

















          • The first one is exactly what I was looking for. Extremely simple and small enough to type depending on my needs. Thanks.

            – 1nt3rn3t
            2 days ago






          • 1





            ... and xargs could also be used as xargs -I sh -c '...' sh , if one wanted to (it makes it possible to run parallel jobs with -P if one wanted to).

            – Kusalananda
            2 days ago
















          The first one is exactly what I was looking for. Extremely simple and small enough to type depending on my needs. Thanks.

          – 1nt3rn3t
          2 days ago





          The first one is exactly what I was looking for. Extremely simple and small enough to type depending on my needs. Thanks.

          – 1nt3rn3t
          2 days ago




          1




          1





          ... and xargs could also be used as xargs -I sh -c '...' sh , if one wanted to (it makes it possible to run parallel jobs with -P if one wanted to).

          – Kusalananda
          2 days ago





          ... and xargs could also be used as xargs -I sh -c '...' sh , if one wanted to (it makes it possible to run parallel jobs with -P if one wanted to).

          – Kusalananda
          2 days ago













          1














          Edit: This answer is not preferred, but is left here for comparison and illustration of potentially dangerous pitfalls in bash scripting.




          You can put bash (or another shell) as your -exec command:



          find -type -f -name "*.txt" -exec bash -c 'egrep -iH something "" | egrep somethingelse | egrep other' ;


          One of the downsides of doing it this way is that it creates more potential for nested quoting issues as your commands get more complex. If you want to avoid that, you can break it out into a for-loop:



          for i in $(find -type -f -name "*.txt"); do
          if egrep -iH something "$i" | egrep somethingelse | egrep other; then
          echo "Found something: $i"
          fi
          done





          share|improve this answer










          New contributor




          trobinson is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
          Check out our Code of Conduct.















          • 1





            The first one is exactly what I was looking for. Extremely simple and small enough to type depending on my needs. Thanks.

            – 1nt3rn3t
            2 days ago






          • 1





            That for loop is a very bad idea.Also known as bash pitfall #1.

            – terdon
            2 days ago






          • 1





            This "" in your first command may even lead to code injection. Imagine you got files from me and there's a file literally named " & rm -rf ~ & : ".txt. Luckily for you -type -f is invalid, it just saved your home directory. Fix the typo and try again. :) terdon did it right: find … -exec sh -c '… "$1" …' foo ;.

            – Kamil Maciorowski
            2 days ago











          • Thanks for the information! Yeah, the -type -f is a typo I make constantly when using find, and I didn't notice it in my answer. Whoops. terdon's answer is better, but I'll leave this for comparative purposes.

            – trobinson
            2 days ago











          • @terdon: tx for referencing the mywiki.wooledge.org page. It's nice to have a bunch of GPs neatly summarized in one place.

            – Cbhihe
            yesterday















          1














          Edit: This answer is not preferred, but is left here for comparison and illustration of potentially dangerous pitfalls in bash scripting.




          You can put bash (or another shell) as your -exec command:



          find -type -f -name "*.txt" -exec bash -c 'egrep -iH something "" | egrep somethingelse | egrep other' ;


          One of the downsides of doing it this way is that it creates more potential for nested quoting issues as your commands get more complex. If you want to avoid that, you can break it out into a for-loop:



          for i in $(find -type -f -name "*.txt"); do
          if egrep -iH something "$i" | egrep somethingelse | egrep other; then
          echo "Found something: $i"
          fi
          done





          share|improve this answer










          New contributor




          trobinson is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
          Check out our Code of Conduct.















          • 1





            The first one is exactly what I was looking for. Extremely simple and small enough to type depending on my needs. Thanks.

            – 1nt3rn3t
            2 days ago






          • 1





            That for loop is a very bad idea.Also known as bash pitfall #1.

            – terdon
            2 days ago






          • 1





            This "" in your first command may even lead to code injection. Imagine you got files from me and there's a file literally named " & rm -rf ~ & : ".txt. Luckily for you -type -f is invalid, it just saved your home directory. Fix the typo and try again. :) terdon did it right: find … -exec sh -c '… "$1" …' foo ;.

            – Kamil Maciorowski
            2 days ago











          • Thanks for the information! Yeah, the -type -f is a typo I make constantly when using find, and I didn't notice it in my answer. Whoops. terdon's answer is better, but I'll leave this for comparative purposes.

            – trobinson
            2 days ago











          • @terdon: tx for referencing the mywiki.wooledge.org page. It's nice to have a bunch of GPs neatly summarized in one place.

            – Cbhihe
            yesterday













          1












          1








          1







          Edit: This answer is not preferred, but is left here for comparison and illustration of potentially dangerous pitfalls in bash scripting.




          You can put bash (or another shell) as your -exec command:



          find -type -f -name "*.txt" -exec bash -c 'egrep -iH something "" | egrep somethingelse | egrep other' ;


          One of the downsides of doing it this way is that it creates more potential for nested quoting issues as your commands get more complex. If you want to avoid that, you can break it out into a for-loop:



          for i in $(find -type -f -name "*.txt"); do
          if egrep -iH something "$i" | egrep somethingelse | egrep other; then
          echo "Found something: $i"
          fi
          done





          share|improve this answer










          New contributor




          trobinson is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
          Check out our Code of Conduct.










          Edit: This answer is not preferred, but is left here for comparison and illustration of potentially dangerous pitfalls in bash scripting.




          You can put bash (or another shell) as your -exec command:



          find -type -f -name "*.txt" -exec bash -c 'egrep -iH something "" | egrep somethingelse | egrep other' ;


          One of the downsides of doing it this way is that it creates more potential for nested quoting issues as your commands get more complex. If you want to avoid that, you can break it out into a for-loop:



          for i in $(find -type -f -name "*.txt"); do
          if egrep -iH something "$i" | egrep somethingelse | egrep other; then
          echo "Found something: $i"
          fi
          done






          share|improve this answer










          New contributor




          trobinson is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
          Check out our Code of Conduct.









          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer








          edited 21 hours ago





















          New contributor




          trobinson is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
          Check out our Code of Conduct.









          answered 2 days ago









          trobinsontrobinson

          443




          443




          New contributor




          trobinson is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
          Check out our Code of Conduct.





          New contributor





          trobinson is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
          Check out our Code of Conduct.






          trobinson is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
          Check out our Code of Conduct.







          • 1





            The first one is exactly what I was looking for. Extremely simple and small enough to type depending on my needs. Thanks.

            – 1nt3rn3t
            2 days ago






          • 1





            That for loop is a very bad idea.Also known as bash pitfall #1.

            – terdon
            2 days ago






          • 1





            This "" in your first command may even lead to code injection. Imagine you got files from me and there's a file literally named " & rm -rf ~ & : ".txt. Luckily for you -type -f is invalid, it just saved your home directory. Fix the typo and try again. :) terdon did it right: find … -exec sh -c '… "$1" …' foo ;.

            – Kamil Maciorowski
            2 days ago











          • Thanks for the information! Yeah, the -type -f is a typo I make constantly when using find, and I didn't notice it in my answer. Whoops. terdon's answer is better, but I'll leave this for comparative purposes.

            – trobinson
            2 days ago











          • @terdon: tx for referencing the mywiki.wooledge.org page. It's nice to have a bunch of GPs neatly summarized in one place.

            – Cbhihe
            yesterday












          • 1





            The first one is exactly what I was looking for. Extremely simple and small enough to type depending on my needs. Thanks.

            – 1nt3rn3t
            2 days ago






          • 1





            That for loop is a very bad idea.Also known as bash pitfall #1.

            – terdon
            2 days ago






          • 1





            This "" in your first command may even lead to code injection. Imagine you got files from me and there's a file literally named " & rm -rf ~ & : ".txt. Luckily for you -type -f is invalid, it just saved your home directory. Fix the typo and try again. :) terdon did it right: find … -exec sh -c '… "$1" …' foo ;.

            – Kamil Maciorowski
            2 days ago











          • Thanks for the information! Yeah, the -type -f is a typo I make constantly when using find, and I didn't notice it in my answer. Whoops. terdon's answer is better, but I'll leave this for comparative purposes.

            – trobinson
            2 days ago











          • @terdon: tx for referencing the mywiki.wooledge.org page. It's nice to have a bunch of GPs neatly summarized in one place.

            – Cbhihe
            yesterday







          1




          1





          The first one is exactly what I was looking for. Extremely simple and small enough to type depending on my needs. Thanks.

          – 1nt3rn3t
          2 days ago





          The first one is exactly what I was looking for. Extremely simple and small enough to type depending on my needs. Thanks.

          – 1nt3rn3t
          2 days ago




          1




          1





          That for loop is a very bad idea.Also known as bash pitfall #1.

          – terdon
          2 days ago





          That for loop is a very bad idea.Also known as bash pitfall #1.

          – terdon
          2 days ago




          1




          1





          This "" in your first command may even lead to code injection. Imagine you got files from me and there's a file literally named " & rm -rf ~ & : ".txt. Luckily for you -type -f is invalid, it just saved your home directory. Fix the typo and try again. :) terdon did it right: find … -exec sh -c '… "$1" …' foo ;.

          – Kamil Maciorowski
          2 days ago





          This "" in your first command may even lead to code injection. Imagine you got files from me and there's a file literally named " & rm -rf ~ & : ".txt. Luckily for you -type -f is invalid, it just saved your home directory. Fix the typo and try again. :) terdon did it right: find … -exec sh -c '… "$1" …' foo ;.

          – Kamil Maciorowski
          2 days ago













          Thanks for the information! Yeah, the -type -f is a typo I make constantly when using find, and I didn't notice it in my answer. Whoops. terdon's answer is better, but I'll leave this for comparative purposes.

          – trobinson
          2 days ago





          Thanks for the information! Yeah, the -type -f is a typo I make constantly when using find, and I didn't notice it in my answer. Whoops. terdon's answer is better, but I'll leave this for comparative purposes.

          – trobinson
          2 days ago













          @terdon: tx for referencing the mywiki.wooledge.org page. It's nice to have a bunch of GPs neatly summarized in one place.

          – Cbhihe
          yesterday





          @terdon: tx for referencing the mywiki.wooledge.org page. It's nice to have a bunch of GPs neatly summarized in one place.

          – Cbhihe
          yesterday










          1nt3rn3t is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.









          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          1nt3rn3t is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.












          1nt3rn3t is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.











          1nt3rn3t is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.














          Thanks for contributing an answer to Unix & Linux Stack Exchange!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid


          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2funix.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f507023%2fpipe-commands-inside-find-exec%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          Færeyskur hestur Heimild | Tengill | Tilvísanir | LeiðsagnarvalRossið - síða um færeyska hrossið á færeyskuGott ár hjá færeyska hestinum

          He _____ here since 1970 . Answer needed [closed]What does “since he was so high” mean?Meaning of “catch birds for”?How do I ensure “since” takes the meaning I want?“Who cares here” meaningWhat does “right round toward” mean?the time tense (had now been detected)What does the phrase “ring around the roses” mean here?Correct usage of “visited upon”Meaning of “foiled rail sabotage bid”It was the third time I had gone to Rome or It is the third time I had been to Rome

          Slayer Innehåll Historia | Stil, komposition och lyrik | Bandets betydelse och framgångar | Sidoprojekt och samarbeten | Kontroverser | Medlemmar | Utmärkelser och nomineringar | Turnéer och festivaler | Diskografi | Referenser | Externa länkar | Navigeringsmenywww.slayer.net”Metal Massacre vol. 1””Metal Massacre vol. 3””Metal Massacre Volume III””Show No Mercy””Haunting the Chapel””Live Undead””Hell Awaits””Reign in Blood””Reign in Blood””Gold & Platinum – Reign in Blood””Golden Gods Awards Winners”originalet”Kerrang! Hall Of Fame””Slayer Looks Back On 37-Year Career In New Video Series: Part Two””South of Heaven””Gold & Platinum – South of Heaven””Seasons in the Abyss””Gold & Platinum - Seasons in the Abyss””Divine Intervention””Divine Intervention - Release group by Slayer””Gold & Platinum - Divine Intervention””Live Intrusion””Undisputed Attitude””Abolish Government/Superficial Love””Release “Slatanic Slaughter: A Tribute to Slayer” by Various Artists””Diabolus in Musica””Soundtrack to the Apocalypse””God Hates Us All””Systematic - Relationships””War at the Warfield””Gold & Platinum - War at the Warfield””Soundtrack to the Apocalypse””Gold & Platinum - Still Reigning””Metallica, Slayer, Iron Mauden Among Winners At Metal Hammer Awards””Eternal Pyre””Eternal Pyre - Slayer release group””Eternal Pyre””Metal Storm Awards 2006””Kerrang! Hall Of Fame””Slayer Wins 'Best Metal' Grammy Award””Slayer Guitarist Jeff Hanneman Dies””Bullet-For My Valentine booed at Metal Hammer Golden Gods Awards””Unholy Aliance””The End Of Slayer?””Slayer: We Could Thrash Out Two More Albums If We're Fast Enough...””'The Unholy Alliance: Chapter III' UK Dates Added”originalet”Megadeth And Slayer To Co-Headline 'Canadian Carnage' Trek”originalet”World Painted Blood””Release “World Painted Blood” by Slayer””Metallica Heading To Cinemas””Slayer, Megadeth To Join Forces For 'European Carnage' Tour - Dec. 18, 2010”originalet”Slayer's Hanneman Contracts Acute Infection; Band To Bring In Guest Guitarist””Cannibal Corpse's Pat O'Brien Will Step In As Slayer's Guest Guitarist”originalet”Slayer’s Jeff Hanneman Dead at 49””Dave Lombardo Says He Made Only $67,000 In 2011 While Touring With Slayer””Slayer: We Do Not Agree With Dave Lombardo's Substance Or Timeline Of Events””Slayer Welcomes Drummer Paul Bostaph Back To The Fold””Slayer Hope to Unveil Never-Before-Heard Jeff Hanneman Material on Next Album””Slayer Debut New Song 'Implode' During Surprise Golden Gods Appearance””Release group Repentless by Slayer””Repentless - Slayer - Credits””Slayer””Metal Storm Awards 2015””Slayer - to release comic book "Repentless #1"””Slayer To Release 'Repentless' 6.66" Vinyl Box Set””BREAKING NEWS: Slayer Announce Farewell Tour””Slayer Recruit Lamb of God, Anthrax, Behemoth + Testament for Final Tour””Slayer lägger ner efter 37 år””Slayer Announces Second North American Leg Of 'Final' Tour””Final World Tour””Slayer Announces Final European Tour With Lamb of God, Anthrax And Obituary””Slayer To Tour Europe With Lamb of God, Anthrax And Obituary””Slayer To Play 'Last French Show Ever' At Next Year's Hellfst””Slayer's Final World Tour Will Extend Into 2019””Death Angel's Rob Cavestany On Slayer's 'Farewell' Tour: 'Some Of Us Could See This Coming'””Testament Has No Plans To Retire Anytime Soon, Says Chuck Billy””Anthrax's Scott Ian On Slayer's 'Farewell' Tour Plans: 'I Was Surprised And I Wasn't Surprised'””Slayer””Slayer's Morbid Schlock””Review/Rock; For Slayer, the Mania Is the Message””Slayer - Biography””Slayer - Reign In Blood”originalet”Dave Lombardo””An exclusive oral history of Slayer”originalet”Exclusive! Interview With Slayer Guitarist Jeff Hanneman”originalet”Thinking Out Loud: Slayer's Kerry King on hair metal, Satan and being polite””Slayer Lyrics””Slayer - Biography””Most influential artists for extreme metal music””Slayer - Reign in Blood””Slayer guitarist Jeff Hanneman dies aged 49””Slatanic Slaughter: A Tribute to Slayer””Gateway to Hell: A Tribute to Slayer””Covered In Blood””Slayer: The Origins of Thrash in San Francisco, CA.””Why They Rule - #6 Slayer”originalet”Guitar World's 100 Greatest Heavy Metal Guitarists Of All Time”originalet”The fans have spoken: Slayer comes out on top in readers' polls”originalet”Tribute to Jeff Hanneman (1964-2013)””Lamb Of God Frontman: We Sound Like A Slayer Rip-Off””BEHEMOTH Frontman Pays Tribute To SLAYER's JEFF HANNEMAN””Slayer, Hatebreed Doing Double Duty On This Year's Ozzfest””System of a Down””Lacuna Coil’s Andrea Ferro Talks Influences, Skateboarding, Band Origins + More””Slayer - Reign in Blood””Into The Lungs of Hell””Slayer rules - en utställning om fans””Slayer and Their Fans Slashed Through a No-Holds-Barred Night at Gas Monkey””Home””Slayer””Gold & Platinum - The Big 4 Live from Sofia, Bulgaria””Exclusive! Interview With Slayer Guitarist Kerry King””2008-02-23: Wiltern, Los Angeles, CA, USA””Slayer's Kerry King To Perform With Megadeth Tonight! - Oct. 21, 2010”originalet”Dave Lombardo - Biography”Slayer Case DismissedArkiveradUltimate Classic Rock: Slayer guitarist Jeff Hanneman dead at 49.”Slayer: "We could never do any thing like Some Kind Of Monster..."””Cannibal Corpse'S Pat O'Brien Will Step In As Slayer'S Guest Guitarist | The Official Slayer Site”originalet”Slayer Wins 'Best Metal' Grammy Award””Slayer Guitarist Jeff Hanneman Dies””Kerrang! Awards 2006 Blog: Kerrang! Hall Of Fame””Kerrang! Awards 2013: Kerrang! Legend”originalet”Metallica, Slayer, Iron Maien Among Winners At Metal Hammer Awards””Metal Hammer Golden Gods Awards””Bullet For My Valentine Booed At Metal Hammer Golden Gods Awards””Metal Storm Awards 2006””Metal Storm Awards 2015””Slayer's Concert History””Slayer - Relationships””Slayer - Releases”Slayers officiella webbplatsSlayer på MusicBrainzOfficiell webbplatsSlayerSlayerr1373445760000 0001 1540 47353068615-5086262726cb13906545x(data)6033143kn20030215029