How to discuss my unexpected experimental results? [closed] Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 23:30 UTC (7:30pm US/Eastern)“That my results are not reproducible” or “that my results are unreproducible”?How to cite a website where the author/publisher are not readily apparent?How to report “Ocean of Knowledge”How do you search for a specific english wordIdiom/Phrase for “results without work/effort”How to refer to myself in a research paper?Need word for situation where conclusion doesn't follow from the experimental dataWhat's an idiom that advises against being results-oriented?an unexpected, thorough, continual feeling of pleasureUsual phrase for “Quarterly financial results”
As a dual citizen, my US passport will expire one day after traveling to the US. Will this work?
Does the Black Tentacles spell do damage twice at the start of turn to an already restrained creature?
Co-worker has annoying ringtone
Why datecode is SO IMPORTANT to chip manufacturers?
What to do with repeated rejections for phd position
Does any scripture mention that forms of God or Goddess are symbolic?
What makes a man succeed?
Project Euler #1 in C++
What is the difference between a "ranged attack" and a "ranged weapon attack"?
What initially awakened the Balrog?
One-one communication
Tannaka duality for semisimple groups
How did Fremen produce and carry enough thumpers to use Sandworms as de facto Ubers?
How does Belgium enforce obligatory attendance in elections?
why did the subset and factor influenced coefficients of logistic regression in R
What are the main differences between Stargate SG-1 cuts?
How do living politicians protect their readily obtainable signatures from misuse?
"klopfte jemand" or "jemand klopfte"?
How many time has Arya actually used Needle?
Did Mueller's report provide an evidentiary basis for the claim of Russian govt election interference via social media?
Do I really need to have a message in a novel to appeal to readers?
Why does electrolysis of aqueous concentrated sodium bromide produce bromine at the anode?
Google .dev domain strangely redirects to https
What adaptations would allow standard fantasy dwarves to survive in the desert?
How to discuss my unexpected experimental results? [closed]
Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara
Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 23:30 UTC (7:30pm US/Eastern)“That my results are not reproducible” or “that my results are unreproducible”?How to cite a website where the author/publisher are not readily apparent?How to report “Ocean of Knowledge”How do you search for a specific english wordIdiom/Phrase for “results without work/effort”How to refer to myself in a research paper?Need word for situation where conclusion doesn't follow from the experimental dataWhat's an idiom that advises against being results-oriented?an unexpected, thorough, continual feeling of pleasureUsual phrase for “Quarterly financial results”
.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;
In my research, I found that my proposed scheme does not provide very "high performance" gains as compared to the conventional scheme I was testing against.
Still, my results are better and I am submitting them to a conference. How can I rephrase the following in an apt manner?
Here, we would like to mention that this increase is lower than our
initial expectation.
phrase-requests writing-style research
asked Mar 24 at 5:27
SjaffrySjaffry
1124
closed as primarily opinion-based by Jason Bassford, tchrist♦ Mar 24 at 16:11
Many good questions generate some degree of opinion based on expert experience, but answers to this question will tend to be almost entirely based on opinions, rather than facts, references, or specific expertise. If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.
add a comment |
In my research, I found that my proposed scheme does not provide very "high performance" gains as compared to the conventional scheme I was testing against.
Still, my results are better and I am submitting them to a conference. How can I rephrase the following in an apt manner?
Here, we would like to mention that this increase is lower than our
initial expectation.
phrase-requests writing-style research
asked Mar 24 at 5:27
SjaffrySjaffry
1124
closed as primarily opinion-based by Jason Bassford, tchrist♦ Mar 24 at 16:11
Many good questions generate some degree of opinion based on expert experience, but answers to this question will tend to be almost entirely based on opinions, rather than facts, references, or specific expertise. If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.
1
There are many ways to express the idea. The one you have suggested is OK. Unless you give some guidance as to what idea, other than the basic fact, you wish to convey, we have nothing to base advice on. Do you wish to say "We were so wrong!" or "We had hoped for more"?
– TRomano
Mar 24 at 11:19
I mean to say, "We had hoped for more"
– Sjaffry
Mar 25 at 0:05
add a comment |
In my research, I found that my proposed scheme does not provide very "high performance" gains as compared to the conventional scheme I was testing against.
Still, my results are better and I am submitting them to a conference. How can I rephrase the following in an apt manner?
Here, we would like to mention that this increase is lower than our
initial expectation.
phrase-requests writing-style research
asked Mar 24 at 5:27
SjaffrySjaffry
1124
In my research, I found that my proposed scheme does not provide very "high performance" gains as compared to the conventional scheme I was testing against.
Still, my results are better and I am submitting them to a conference. How can I rephrase the following in an apt manner?
Here, we would like to mention that this increase is lower than our
initial expectation.
phrase-requests writing-style research
phrase-requests writing-style research
asked Mar 24 at 5:27
SjaffrySjaffry
1124
asked Mar 24 at 5:27
SjaffrySjaffry
1124
asked Mar 24 at 5:27
SjaffrySjaffry
1124
asked Mar 24 at 5:27
SjaffrySjaffry
1124
asked Mar 24 at 5:27
SjaffrySjaffry
1124
1124
closed as primarily opinion-based by Jason Bassford, tchrist♦ Mar 24 at 16:11
Many good questions generate some degree of opinion based on expert experience, but answers to this question will tend to be almost entirely based on opinions, rather than facts, references, or specific expertise. If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.
closed as primarily opinion-based by Jason Bassford, tchrist♦ Mar 24 at 16:11
Many good questions generate some degree of opinion based on expert experience, but answers to this question will tend to be almost entirely based on opinions, rather than facts, references, or specific expertise. If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.
1
There are many ways to express the idea. The one you have suggested is OK. Unless you give some guidance as to what idea, other than the basic fact, you wish to convey, we have nothing to base advice on. Do you wish to say "We were so wrong!" or "We had hoped for more"?
– TRomano
Mar 24 at 11:19
I mean to say, "We had hoped for more"
– Sjaffry
Mar 25 at 0:05
add a comment |
1
There are many ways to express the idea. The one you have suggested is OK. Unless you give some guidance as to what idea, other than the basic fact, you wish to convey, we have nothing to base advice on. Do you wish to say "We were so wrong!" or "We had hoped for more"?
– TRomano
Mar 24 at 11:19
I mean to say, "We had hoped for more"
– Sjaffry
Mar 25 at 0:05
1
1
There are many ways to express the idea. The one you have suggested is OK. Unless you give some guidance as to what idea, other than the basic fact, you wish to convey, we have nothing to base advice on. Do you wish to say "We were so wrong!" or "We had hoped for more"?
– TRomano
Mar 24 at 11:19
There are many ways to express the idea. The one you have suggested is OK. Unless you give some guidance as to what idea, other than the basic fact, you wish to convey, we have nothing to base advice on. Do you wish to say "We were so wrong!" or "We had hoped for more"?
– TRomano
Mar 24 at 11:19
I mean to say, "We had hoped for more"
– Sjaffry
Mar 25 at 0:05
I mean to say, "We had hoped for more"
– Sjaffry
Mar 25 at 0:05
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
It sounds fine to me. I might suggest adding a few additional words - "but is still significant nevertheless". It gives direction to the ultimate idea you are trying to convey.
Here, we would like to mention that this increase is lower than our
initial expectation, but is still significant nevertheless.
https://www.thefreedictionary.com/nevertheless
answered Mar 24 at 11:32
user22542user22542
3,8511512
add a comment |
I am going to drift a little away with this link to your question, but I thought it could be useful or wide-eye open to you. replication crisis
I hesitate if significant is the right word since it must imply a statistic calculus and it means the variables have a certain correlation either positive or negative.
I would just say:
as soon as the scheme is amended the performance is lower. (that has to have an explanation).
answered Mar 24 at 12:45
NicoleNicole
313
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
It sounds fine to me. I might suggest adding a few additional words - "but is still significant nevertheless". It gives direction to the ultimate idea you are trying to convey.
Here, we would like to mention that this increase is lower than our
initial expectation, but is still significant nevertheless.
https://www.thefreedictionary.com/nevertheless
answered Mar 24 at 11:32
user22542user22542
3,8511512
add a comment |
It sounds fine to me. I might suggest adding a few additional words - "but is still significant nevertheless". It gives direction to the ultimate idea you are trying to convey.
Here, we would like to mention that this increase is lower than our
initial expectation, but is still significant nevertheless.
https://www.thefreedictionary.com/nevertheless
answered Mar 24 at 11:32
user22542user22542
3,8511512
add a comment |
It sounds fine to me. I might suggest adding a few additional words - "but is still significant nevertheless". It gives direction to the ultimate idea you are trying to convey.
Here, we would like to mention that this increase is lower than our
initial expectation, but is still significant nevertheless.
https://www.thefreedictionary.com/nevertheless
answered Mar 24 at 11:32
user22542user22542
3,8511512
It sounds fine to me. I might suggest adding a few additional words - "but is still significant nevertheless". It gives direction to the ultimate idea you are trying to convey.
Here, we would like to mention that this increase is lower than our
initial expectation, but is still significant nevertheless.
https://www.thefreedictionary.com/nevertheless
answered Mar 24 at 11:32
user22542user22542
3,8511512
answered Mar 24 at 11:32
user22542user22542
3,8511512
answered Mar 24 at 11:32
user22542user22542
3,8511512
answered Mar 24 at 11:32
user22542user22542
3,8511512
3,8511512
add a comment |
add a comment |
I am going to drift a little away with this link to your question, but I thought it could be useful or wide-eye open to you. replication crisis
I hesitate if significant is the right word since it must imply a statistic calculus and it means the variables have a certain correlation either positive or negative.
I would just say:
as soon as the scheme is amended the performance is lower. (that has to have an explanation).
answered Mar 24 at 12:45
NicoleNicole
313
add a comment |
I am going to drift a little away with this link to your question, but I thought it could be useful or wide-eye open to you. replication crisis
I hesitate if significant is the right word since it must imply a statistic calculus and it means the variables have a certain correlation either positive or negative.
I would just say:
as soon as the scheme is amended the performance is lower. (that has to have an explanation).
answered Mar 24 at 12:45
NicoleNicole
313
add a comment |
I am going to drift a little away with this link to your question, but I thought it could be useful or wide-eye open to you. replication crisis
I hesitate if significant is the right word since it must imply a statistic calculus and it means the variables have a certain correlation either positive or negative.
I would just say:
as soon as the scheme is amended the performance is lower. (that has to have an explanation).
answered Mar 24 at 12:45
NicoleNicole
313
I am going to drift a little away with this link to your question, but I thought it could be useful or wide-eye open to you. replication crisis
I hesitate if significant is the right word since it must imply a statistic calculus and it means the variables have a certain correlation either positive or negative.
I would just say:
as soon as the scheme is amended the performance is lower. (that has to have an explanation).
answered Mar 24 at 12:45
NicoleNicole
313
answered Mar 24 at 12:45
NicoleNicole
313
answered Mar 24 at 12:45
NicoleNicole
313
answered Mar 24 at 12:45
NicoleNicole
313
313
add a comment |
add a comment |
1
There are many ways to express the idea. The one you have suggested is OK. Unless you give some guidance as to what idea, other than the basic fact, you wish to convey, we have nothing to base advice on. Do you wish to say "We were so wrong!" or "We had hoped for more"?
– TRomano
Mar 24 at 11:19
I mean to say, "We had hoped for more"
– Sjaffry
Mar 25 at 0:05