What is the gram­mat­i­cal term for “‑ed” words like these? Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 23:30 UTC (7:30pm US/Eastern)Is “programming” not a noun?Why does the 3rd-person of verbs that end in -y follow the rule for plural nouns instead of verbs?What is the word for “turning a noun into an adjective”?What is there in the English corpus beside nouns, verbs, adjectives, adverbs, etc?What part of speech are the words the, a, my, that, your, each, every, etc, or what category do they fall under?What is the part of speech for words suffixed with “ity”?How many parts of speech can a word be at the same time?Words like 'maybe', 'possibly', 'might' 'likely'Term for describing what you like using particular adjectivesUmbrella term for word typesName for words like whatchamacallit, doohickey, thingamabob

Fit (vertically portrayed) image with the caption displayed below

One-one communication

I can't produce songs

If Windows 7 doesn't support WSL, then what is "Subsystem for UNIX-based Applications"?

Tannaka duality for semisimple groups

Manga where all the characters were human/animal hybrids

On a mistake computing the Kullback Liebler Information Criterion

Creating a body for the spirit of a magic item?

Why datecode is SO IMPORTANT to chip manufacturers?

How to ternary Plot3D a function

Trademark violation for app?

What would you call this weird metallic apparatus that allows you to lift people?

What initially awakened the Balrog?

How much damage would a cupful of neutron star matter do to the Earth?

AppleTVs create a chatty alternate WiFi network

License to disallow distribution in closed source software, but allow exceptions made by owner?

Do reserved cards get returned when gold token is spent?

How does Belgium enforce obligatory attendance in elections?

Why in helicopter autorotation phase the opposing torque is eliminated?

Mechanism of oxidative dearomatisation with hypervalent iodine

In musical terms, what properties are varied by the human voice to produce different words / syllables?

How does the math work when buying airline miles?

The Nth Gryphon Number

How to fit content of minipage dynamically within a standalone?



What is the gram­mat­i­cal term for “‑ed” words like these?



Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara
Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 23:30 UTC (7:30pm US/Eastern)Is “programming” not a noun?Why does the 3rd-person of verbs that end in -y follow the rule for plural nouns instead of verbs?What is the word for “turning a noun into an adjective”?What is there in the English corpus beside nouns, verbs, adjectives, adverbs, etc?What part of speech are the words the, a, my, that, your, each, every, etc, or what category do they fall under?What is the part of speech for words suffixed with “ity”?How many parts of speech can a word be at the same time?Words like 'maybe', 'possibly', 'might' 'likely'Term for describing what you like using particular adjectivesUmbrella term for word typesName for words like whatchamacallit, doohickey, thingamabob



.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;








5















In English we say things like:



  • a cal­i­brated de­vice

  • a dis­trib­uted prod­uct

  • a founded com­pany

  • a de­stroyed house

Those ‑ed words there all sig­nify that some verb (here re­spec­tively cal­i­brate, dis­tribute, found, or de­stroy) has been “done onto”
the noun that fol­lows it. What is the term for this gram­mat­i­cal de­vice? Or, what is a sin­gle term for some­thing hav­ing been done unto X as a
char­ac­ter­is­tic of that X?



As­sum­ing that we’re talk­ing only about words that de­rive from verbs and used with nouns
here like my ex­am­ples all do, can that gram­mat­i­cal term you’ve cho­sen
also be ap­plied to any sorts of words that do not end in ‑ed,
and are there any sorts of words that do end in ‑ed which this
gram­mat­i­cal term would not ap­ply equally to?










share|improve this question
























  • @user22542, "to run" or "to jump" is also an "action", but it is not something that is "done onto a NOUN".

    – user56834
    Mar 24 at 11:40






  • 6





    I’m not entirely sure what you’re asking here. What ‘device’ are you referring to, exactly? The words you highlight are all adjectives, more specifically past participles of verbs. Is that what you’re looking for (because if so, I’d say that was off-topic here as being easily findable in general references)? If not, please edit your question to make it clearer what exactly it is you’re after.

    – Janus Bahs Jacquet
    Mar 24 at 11:41











  • Alas, when a verb form, eg, functions as an adjective there are a dozen different terms used to describe it, most more confusing than elucidating.

    – Hot Licks
    Mar 24 at 12:11











  • Reminder to everyone: answer in answers, not in comments. Comments are for asking for clarification or suggesting improvements to the question.

    – V2Blast
    Mar 25 at 4:23

















5















In English we say things like:



  • a cal­i­brated de­vice

  • a dis­trib­uted prod­uct

  • a founded com­pany

  • a de­stroyed house

Those ‑ed words there all sig­nify that some verb (here re­spec­tively cal­i­brate, dis­tribute, found, or de­stroy) has been “done onto”
the noun that fol­lows it. What is the term for this gram­mat­i­cal de­vice? Or, what is a sin­gle term for some­thing hav­ing been done unto X as a
char­ac­ter­is­tic of that X?



As­sum­ing that we’re talk­ing only about words that de­rive from verbs and used with nouns
here like my ex­am­ples all do, can that gram­mat­i­cal term you’ve cho­sen
also be ap­plied to any sorts of words that do not end in ‑ed,
and are there any sorts of words that do end in ‑ed which this
gram­mat­i­cal term would not ap­ply equally to?










share|improve this question
























  • @user22542, "to run" or "to jump" is also an "action", but it is not something that is "done onto a NOUN".

    – user56834
    Mar 24 at 11:40






  • 6





    I’m not entirely sure what you’re asking here. What ‘device’ are you referring to, exactly? The words you highlight are all adjectives, more specifically past participles of verbs. Is that what you’re looking for (because if so, I’d say that was off-topic here as being easily findable in general references)? If not, please edit your question to make it clearer what exactly it is you’re after.

    – Janus Bahs Jacquet
    Mar 24 at 11:41











  • Alas, when a verb form, eg, functions as an adjective there are a dozen different terms used to describe it, most more confusing than elucidating.

    – Hot Licks
    Mar 24 at 12:11











  • Reminder to everyone: answer in answers, not in comments. Comments are for asking for clarification or suggesting improvements to the question.

    – V2Blast
    Mar 25 at 4:23













5












5








5








In English we say things like:



  • a cal­i­brated de­vice

  • a dis­trib­uted prod­uct

  • a founded com­pany

  • a de­stroyed house

Those ‑ed words there all sig­nify that some verb (here re­spec­tively cal­i­brate, dis­tribute, found, or de­stroy) has been “done onto”
the noun that fol­lows it. What is the term for this gram­mat­i­cal de­vice? Or, what is a sin­gle term for some­thing hav­ing been done unto X as a
char­ac­ter­is­tic of that X?



As­sum­ing that we’re talk­ing only about words that de­rive from verbs and used with nouns
here like my ex­am­ples all do, can that gram­mat­i­cal term you’ve cho­sen
also be ap­plied to any sorts of words that do not end in ‑ed,
and are there any sorts of words that do end in ‑ed which this
gram­mat­i­cal term would not ap­ply equally to?










share|improve this question
















In English we say things like:



  • a cal­i­brated de­vice

  • a dis­trib­uted prod­uct

  • a founded com­pany

  • a de­stroyed house

Those ‑ed words there all sig­nify that some verb (here re­spec­tively cal­i­brate, dis­tribute, found, or de­stroy) has been “done onto”
the noun that fol­lows it. What is the term for this gram­mat­i­cal de­vice? Or, what is a sin­gle term for some­thing hav­ing been done unto X as a
char­ac­ter­is­tic of that X?



As­sum­ing that we’re talk­ing only about words that de­rive from verbs and used with nouns
here like my ex­am­ples all do, can that gram­mat­i­cal term you’ve cho­sen
also be ap­plied to any sorts of words that do not end in ‑ed,
and are there any sorts of words that do end in ‑ed which this
gram­mat­i­cal term would not ap­ply equally to?







single-word-requests syntactic-analysis parts-of-speech inflectional-morphology grammatical-roles






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited Mar 24 at 15:15









tchrist

110k30296477




110k30296477










asked Mar 24 at 11:28









user56834user56834

1746




1746












  • @user22542, "to run" or "to jump" is also an "action", but it is not something that is "done onto a NOUN".

    – user56834
    Mar 24 at 11:40






  • 6





    I’m not entirely sure what you’re asking here. What ‘device’ are you referring to, exactly? The words you highlight are all adjectives, more specifically past participles of verbs. Is that what you’re looking for (because if so, I’d say that was off-topic here as being easily findable in general references)? If not, please edit your question to make it clearer what exactly it is you’re after.

    – Janus Bahs Jacquet
    Mar 24 at 11:41











  • Alas, when a verb form, eg, functions as an adjective there are a dozen different terms used to describe it, most more confusing than elucidating.

    – Hot Licks
    Mar 24 at 12:11











  • Reminder to everyone: answer in answers, not in comments. Comments are for asking for clarification or suggesting improvements to the question.

    – V2Blast
    Mar 25 at 4:23

















  • @user22542, "to run" or "to jump" is also an "action", but it is not something that is "done onto a NOUN".

    – user56834
    Mar 24 at 11:40






  • 6





    I’m not entirely sure what you’re asking here. What ‘device’ are you referring to, exactly? The words you highlight are all adjectives, more specifically past participles of verbs. Is that what you’re looking for (because if so, I’d say that was off-topic here as being easily findable in general references)? If not, please edit your question to make it clearer what exactly it is you’re after.

    – Janus Bahs Jacquet
    Mar 24 at 11:41











  • Alas, when a verb form, eg, functions as an adjective there are a dozen different terms used to describe it, most more confusing than elucidating.

    – Hot Licks
    Mar 24 at 12:11











  • Reminder to everyone: answer in answers, not in comments. Comments are for asking for clarification or suggesting improvements to the question.

    – V2Blast
    Mar 25 at 4:23
















@user22542, "to run" or "to jump" is also an "action", but it is not something that is "done onto a NOUN".

– user56834
Mar 24 at 11:40





@user22542, "to run" or "to jump" is also an "action", but it is not something that is "done onto a NOUN".

– user56834
Mar 24 at 11:40




6




6





I’m not entirely sure what you’re asking here. What ‘device’ are you referring to, exactly? The words you highlight are all adjectives, more specifically past participles of verbs. Is that what you’re looking for (because if so, I’d say that was off-topic here as being easily findable in general references)? If not, please edit your question to make it clearer what exactly it is you’re after.

– Janus Bahs Jacquet
Mar 24 at 11:41





I’m not entirely sure what you’re asking here. What ‘device’ are you referring to, exactly? The words you highlight are all adjectives, more specifically past participles of verbs. Is that what you’re looking for (because if so, I’d say that was off-topic here as being easily findable in general references)? If not, please edit your question to make it clearer what exactly it is you’re after.

– Janus Bahs Jacquet
Mar 24 at 11:41













Alas, when a verb form, eg, functions as an adjective there are a dozen different terms used to describe it, most more confusing than elucidating.

– Hot Licks
Mar 24 at 12:11





Alas, when a verb form, eg, functions as an adjective there are a dozen different terms used to describe it, most more confusing than elucidating.

– Hot Licks
Mar 24 at 12:11













Reminder to everyone: answer in answers, not in comments. Comments are for asking for clarification or suggesting improvements to the question.

– V2Blast
Mar 25 at 4:23





Reminder to everyone: answer in answers, not in comments. Comments are for asking for clarification or suggesting improvements to the question.

– V2Blast
Mar 25 at 4:23










5 Answers
5






active

oldest

votes


















14














They are called the Past Participle.
They can either be formed by adding the suffix ed



or be an irregular such as: eat-> eaten -> fight -> fought (not to be confused with The Past Simple which is simply the verb of past simple tenses clauses.



They can be many things in English.



just to name a few:



  • an adjective

  • the perfect module verbs

  • passive voice





share|improve this answer























  • What’s a “perfect module verb”?

    – tchrist
    Mar 24 at 15:19











  • Though '-ed forms' are traditionally termed 'Past Participles' they have nothing to do with Grammar Tenses. That's why I would call them 'Passive Participles'.

    – user307254
    Mar 24 at 16:13











  • @user307254 Also, past participles do not have anything to do with passive voice, necessarily, as in I have seen it.. In addition the term "passive participle" is not really common.

    – rexkogitans
    Mar 24 at 17:57











  • @RMac Did you misinterpret my comment?

    – rexkogitans
    Mar 24 at 21:47











  • @rexkogitans Yes, I did. It was the first word "also" and my toddler distracting me that did it. :) Apologies, I will delete my comment. But I do agree with you that "perfect participle" is not a good term due to its rarity and also inaccuracy. "Perfect" is a word used to describe other things in grammar, and it doesn't make sense to use it here.

    – R Mac
    Mar 24 at 22:02


















2














In English, a verb that is used as an adjective to describe a noun is called a participle. See UhtredRagnarsson's answer.




A participle is a word formed from a verb, usually by adding -d, -ed, or -ing.



There are two kinds of participle in English, as follows:



The present participle



[...]



The past participle



Participles are used [...] as adjectives.




[see article for other uses]



There is, however, a different term used to describe verbs when the action of the verb is performed on/to/at/etc. something. That term is transitive verb.




transitive verb is one that is used with an object: a noun, phrase, or pronoun that refers to the person or thing that is affected by the action of the verb. In the following sentences, admire, maintain, face, and love are transitive verbs:



I admire your courage.



We need to maintain product quality.



I couldn’t face him today.



She loves animals.







share|improve this answer























  • It's worth noting that transitive verbs are often made into past participles, like in the examples given in the question. Those are still past participles. There is no word to differentiate transitive participles from intransitive participles or from transitive verbs used where the object of the verb is not relevant to the meaning the participle is used to convey (and therefore is omitted from the use of the participle).

    – R Mac
    Mar 24 at 19:20


















2














The -ed in all of your examples is a past-participle suffix. A past participle is not a derived form: rather, it is an inflected form of a verb (assuming you accept the distinction between derivation and inflection as grammatical processes in English). Most past participles end in -ed, but some end in -⁠(e)n instead (like beaten) and some don't end in either -ed or -(e)n (like stood or hurt). The past participle can have a passive meaning, so it can also be called a "passive participle". In the context of English, "past participle" and "passive participle" refer to the same verb form.



But not all words ending in -ed are verb forms. Words belonging to other parts of speech can be derived from past participles. I think the most common type of derivation is past participle → adjective. Since verbs and adjectives are distinct parts of speech, it's best not to refer to such adjectives as "participles": instead, they can be called departicipial adjectives (a synonymous term is "participial adjectives"), which lets us reserve the term participle for the inflected form of the verb. That said, it's not always possible to figure out whether a word is a participle or a departicipial adjective.



Here are some common texts for finding out whether a word is an adjective or a verb:



  • Can it be preceded by very? If so, it's an adjective. This test doesn't give positive results for me for any of your phrases. (But note that this test only works one way: it can't tell you that a word isn't an adjective. There are some adjectives that can't be preceded by very.)


  • Can it be preceded by carefully? If so, it's a verb. For me, this test indicates that the -ed words in all of your examples could be verbs.


  • Can you add the prefix un- (with the sense of "not", not with a sense of reversal)? If so, it's probably an adjective. For me, this test indicates that calibrated at least can be an adjective (since we certainly can say "an uncalibrated device"). The situation is less clear for distributed, destroyed and founded. There are dictionary entries for undistributed and undestroyed, but "an undistributed product" and "an undestroyed house" both sound a bit weird to me. Unfounded clearly exists as the negation of a different sense of the word founded, but *"an unfounded com­pany" doesn't seem acceptable to me.


There are other possible tests, but I can't describe all of them. Some sources suggest that word order might be relevant, but I believe this is a mistaken view, so I haven't included this as a test.



I think I've made it clear from what I've said above that there are many words ending in -ed that are not past participles/passive participles. (Most obviously, many past-tense verb forms end in -ed, but they are definitely not participles.)






share|improve this answer

























  • Right: ideas can be unfounded, but probably not companies.

    – tchrist
    Mar 24 at 22:45











  • This is a very good answer. At the risk of making things harder than they need be, I cannot help but wonder whether it also applies to such things as hard-boiled eggs with hard-set egg yolks, hard-bound books, hand-drawn illustrations, horse-drawn carriages, hard-handed despots, hard-bitten veterans, hard-nosed detectives, hard-hearted lovers, hard-fought battles, hard-won victories, and ill-gotten gains.

    – tchrist
    Mar 24 at 22:57











  • I though the word "participle" meant "verb form used as an adjective"; in my understanding, the "-ing" form of a verb can be referred to as a participle or a gerund, depending on whether it's used as a verb or a noun.

    – No Name
    Mar 25 at 5:42











  • @NoName: Terminology in this area is a bit confusing. A verb in participle form can be said to be "used as an adjective", in that it can appear in many of the same contexts as an adjective (for example, after a form of "to be"). But many linguists would say that a verb does not become an adjective just by being used this way.

    – sumelic
    Mar 25 at 5:51







  • 1





    @NoName: Likewise, there is a distinction between -ing forms that are verbs "used as nouns", e.g. in contexts like "Carefully building relationships is an important element of success" ("building" here would traditionally be called a gerund) and -ing forms that actually are nouns, such as "building" in "The careful building of relationships is an important element of success" (this type of noun can be called a "gerundial noun"; see my question here: Is “programming” not a noun?).

    – sumelic
    Mar 25 at 5:51



















0














I don't think the tense of the verb is the point of your question. I suppose a simple answer is they are "actions" as verbs, but thank you for the additional input in the comments. More specifically, they are "objective actions", or you might possibly consider "operative actions" as well (because they are exerting force or influence on something).



https://www.thefreedictionary.com/objective



https://www.thefreedictionary.com/operative






share|improve this answer






























    -1














    This is really simple. It does not need a whole note for explanation.



    The "ed" is grammatically referred as the past tense marker ...... the past participle



    However, don't be confused when the past tense marker is added to a verb to perform the function of an Adjective.



    For instance,



    1. A distributed products

    2. A designed artifact

    3. The faded car





    share|improve this answer




















    • 1





      Simple past tense and past participle serve very different purposes in a sentence. Simple past tense is used to show the verb happened in the past, while past participle is the verb form that acts as an adjective (being something that happened to the modified noun in the past). Also, the phrase "past tense marker" is not used to reference the "-ed" suffix because irregular verbs (e.g., "break" / "broke" / "broken") do not match that pattern.

      – R Mac
      Mar 26 at 1:23












    • All right, perfectly perfect. However, I meant this past tense marker "-ed" is attached to regular verbs. Hence, the past participles perform the functions of an Adjective.

      – user341285
      Mar 26 at 7:19











    Your Answer








    StackExchange.ready(function()
    var channelOptions =
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "97"
    ;
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
    createEditor();
    );

    else
    createEditor();

    );

    function createEditor()
    StackExchange.prepareEditor(
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: false,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: null,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader:
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    ,
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    );



    );













    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function ()
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fenglish.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f491077%2fwhat-is-the-gram-mat-i-cal-term-for-ed-words-like-these%23new-answer', 'question_page');

    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    5 Answers
    5






    active

    oldest

    votes








    5 Answers
    5






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    14














    They are called the Past Participle.
    They can either be formed by adding the suffix ed



    or be an irregular such as: eat-> eaten -> fight -> fought (not to be confused with The Past Simple which is simply the verb of past simple tenses clauses.



    They can be many things in English.



    just to name a few:



    • an adjective

    • the perfect module verbs

    • passive voice





    share|improve this answer























    • What’s a “perfect module verb”?

      – tchrist
      Mar 24 at 15:19











    • Though '-ed forms' are traditionally termed 'Past Participles' they have nothing to do with Grammar Tenses. That's why I would call them 'Passive Participles'.

      – user307254
      Mar 24 at 16:13











    • @user307254 Also, past participles do not have anything to do with passive voice, necessarily, as in I have seen it.. In addition the term "passive participle" is not really common.

      – rexkogitans
      Mar 24 at 17:57











    • @RMac Did you misinterpret my comment?

      – rexkogitans
      Mar 24 at 21:47











    • @rexkogitans Yes, I did. It was the first word "also" and my toddler distracting me that did it. :) Apologies, I will delete my comment. But I do agree with you that "perfect participle" is not a good term due to its rarity and also inaccuracy. "Perfect" is a word used to describe other things in grammar, and it doesn't make sense to use it here.

      – R Mac
      Mar 24 at 22:02















    14














    They are called the Past Participle.
    They can either be formed by adding the suffix ed



    or be an irregular such as: eat-> eaten -> fight -> fought (not to be confused with The Past Simple which is simply the verb of past simple tenses clauses.



    They can be many things in English.



    just to name a few:



    • an adjective

    • the perfect module verbs

    • passive voice





    share|improve this answer























    • What’s a “perfect module verb”?

      – tchrist
      Mar 24 at 15:19











    • Though '-ed forms' are traditionally termed 'Past Participles' they have nothing to do with Grammar Tenses. That's why I would call them 'Passive Participles'.

      – user307254
      Mar 24 at 16:13











    • @user307254 Also, past participles do not have anything to do with passive voice, necessarily, as in I have seen it.. In addition the term "passive participle" is not really common.

      – rexkogitans
      Mar 24 at 17:57











    • @RMac Did you misinterpret my comment?

      – rexkogitans
      Mar 24 at 21:47











    • @rexkogitans Yes, I did. It was the first word "also" and my toddler distracting me that did it. :) Apologies, I will delete my comment. But I do agree with you that "perfect participle" is not a good term due to its rarity and also inaccuracy. "Perfect" is a word used to describe other things in grammar, and it doesn't make sense to use it here.

      – R Mac
      Mar 24 at 22:02













    14












    14








    14







    They are called the Past Participle.
    They can either be formed by adding the suffix ed



    or be an irregular such as: eat-> eaten -> fight -> fought (not to be confused with The Past Simple which is simply the verb of past simple tenses clauses.



    They can be many things in English.



    just to name a few:



    • an adjective

    • the perfect module verbs

    • passive voice





    share|improve this answer













    They are called the Past Participle.
    They can either be formed by adding the suffix ed



    or be an irregular such as: eat-> eaten -> fight -> fought (not to be confused with The Past Simple which is simply the verb of past simple tenses clauses.



    They can be many things in English.



    just to name a few:



    • an adjective

    • the perfect module verbs

    • passive voice






    share|improve this answer












    share|improve this answer



    share|improve this answer










    answered Mar 24 at 11:46









    Uhtred RagnarssonUhtred Ragnarsson

    67537




    67537












    • What’s a “perfect module verb”?

      – tchrist
      Mar 24 at 15:19











    • Though '-ed forms' are traditionally termed 'Past Participles' they have nothing to do with Grammar Tenses. That's why I would call them 'Passive Participles'.

      – user307254
      Mar 24 at 16:13











    • @user307254 Also, past participles do not have anything to do with passive voice, necessarily, as in I have seen it.. In addition the term "passive participle" is not really common.

      – rexkogitans
      Mar 24 at 17:57











    • @RMac Did you misinterpret my comment?

      – rexkogitans
      Mar 24 at 21:47











    • @rexkogitans Yes, I did. It was the first word "also" and my toddler distracting me that did it. :) Apologies, I will delete my comment. But I do agree with you that "perfect participle" is not a good term due to its rarity and also inaccuracy. "Perfect" is a word used to describe other things in grammar, and it doesn't make sense to use it here.

      – R Mac
      Mar 24 at 22:02

















    • What’s a “perfect module verb”?

      – tchrist
      Mar 24 at 15:19











    • Though '-ed forms' are traditionally termed 'Past Participles' they have nothing to do with Grammar Tenses. That's why I would call them 'Passive Participles'.

      – user307254
      Mar 24 at 16:13











    • @user307254 Also, past participles do not have anything to do with passive voice, necessarily, as in I have seen it.. In addition the term "passive participle" is not really common.

      – rexkogitans
      Mar 24 at 17:57











    • @RMac Did you misinterpret my comment?

      – rexkogitans
      Mar 24 at 21:47











    • @rexkogitans Yes, I did. It was the first word "also" and my toddler distracting me that did it. :) Apologies, I will delete my comment. But I do agree with you that "perfect participle" is not a good term due to its rarity and also inaccuracy. "Perfect" is a word used to describe other things in grammar, and it doesn't make sense to use it here.

      – R Mac
      Mar 24 at 22:02
















    What’s a “perfect module verb”?

    – tchrist
    Mar 24 at 15:19





    What’s a “perfect module verb”?

    – tchrist
    Mar 24 at 15:19













    Though '-ed forms' are traditionally termed 'Past Participles' they have nothing to do with Grammar Tenses. That's why I would call them 'Passive Participles'.

    – user307254
    Mar 24 at 16:13





    Though '-ed forms' are traditionally termed 'Past Participles' they have nothing to do with Grammar Tenses. That's why I would call them 'Passive Participles'.

    – user307254
    Mar 24 at 16:13













    @user307254 Also, past participles do not have anything to do with passive voice, necessarily, as in I have seen it.. In addition the term "passive participle" is not really common.

    – rexkogitans
    Mar 24 at 17:57





    @user307254 Also, past participles do not have anything to do with passive voice, necessarily, as in I have seen it.. In addition the term "passive participle" is not really common.

    – rexkogitans
    Mar 24 at 17:57













    @RMac Did you misinterpret my comment?

    – rexkogitans
    Mar 24 at 21:47





    @RMac Did you misinterpret my comment?

    – rexkogitans
    Mar 24 at 21:47













    @rexkogitans Yes, I did. It was the first word "also" and my toddler distracting me that did it. :) Apologies, I will delete my comment. But I do agree with you that "perfect participle" is not a good term due to its rarity and also inaccuracy. "Perfect" is a word used to describe other things in grammar, and it doesn't make sense to use it here.

    – R Mac
    Mar 24 at 22:02





    @rexkogitans Yes, I did. It was the first word "also" and my toddler distracting me that did it. :) Apologies, I will delete my comment. But I do agree with you that "perfect participle" is not a good term due to its rarity and also inaccuracy. "Perfect" is a word used to describe other things in grammar, and it doesn't make sense to use it here.

    – R Mac
    Mar 24 at 22:02













    2














    In English, a verb that is used as an adjective to describe a noun is called a participle. See UhtredRagnarsson's answer.




    A participle is a word formed from a verb, usually by adding -d, -ed, or -ing.



    There are two kinds of participle in English, as follows:



    The present participle



    [...]



    The past participle



    Participles are used [...] as adjectives.




    [see article for other uses]



    There is, however, a different term used to describe verbs when the action of the verb is performed on/to/at/etc. something. That term is transitive verb.




    transitive verb is one that is used with an object: a noun, phrase, or pronoun that refers to the person or thing that is affected by the action of the verb. In the following sentences, admire, maintain, face, and love are transitive verbs:



    I admire your courage.



    We need to maintain product quality.



    I couldn’t face him today.



    She loves animals.







    share|improve this answer























    • It's worth noting that transitive verbs are often made into past participles, like in the examples given in the question. Those are still past participles. There is no word to differentiate transitive participles from intransitive participles or from transitive verbs used where the object of the verb is not relevant to the meaning the participle is used to convey (and therefore is omitted from the use of the participle).

      – R Mac
      Mar 24 at 19:20















    2














    In English, a verb that is used as an adjective to describe a noun is called a participle. See UhtredRagnarsson's answer.




    A participle is a word formed from a verb, usually by adding -d, -ed, or -ing.



    There are two kinds of participle in English, as follows:



    The present participle



    [...]



    The past participle



    Participles are used [...] as adjectives.




    [see article for other uses]



    There is, however, a different term used to describe verbs when the action of the verb is performed on/to/at/etc. something. That term is transitive verb.




    transitive verb is one that is used with an object: a noun, phrase, or pronoun that refers to the person or thing that is affected by the action of the verb. In the following sentences, admire, maintain, face, and love are transitive verbs:



    I admire your courage.



    We need to maintain product quality.



    I couldn’t face him today.



    She loves animals.







    share|improve this answer























    • It's worth noting that transitive verbs are often made into past participles, like in the examples given in the question. Those are still past participles. There is no word to differentiate transitive participles from intransitive participles or from transitive verbs used where the object of the verb is not relevant to the meaning the participle is used to convey (and therefore is omitted from the use of the participle).

      – R Mac
      Mar 24 at 19:20













    2












    2








    2







    In English, a verb that is used as an adjective to describe a noun is called a participle. See UhtredRagnarsson's answer.




    A participle is a word formed from a verb, usually by adding -d, -ed, or -ing.



    There are two kinds of participle in English, as follows:



    The present participle



    [...]



    The past participle



    Participles are used [...] as adjectives.




    [see article for other uses]



    There is, however, a different term used to describe verbs when the action of the verb is performed on/to/at/etc. something. That term is transitive verb.




    transitive verb is one that is used with an object: a noun, phrase, or pronoun that refers to the person or thing that is affected by the action of the verb. In the following sentences, admire, maintain, face, and love are transitive verbs:



    I admire your courage.



    We need to maintain product quality.



    I couldn’t face him today.



    She loves animals.







    share|improve this answer













    In English, a verb that is used as an adjective to describe a noun is called a participle. See UhtredRagnarsson's answer.




    A participle is a word formed from a verb, usually by adding -d, -ed, or -ing.



    There are two kinds of participle in English, as follows:



    The present participle



    [...]



    The past participle



    Participles are used [...] as adjectives.




    [see article for other uses]



    There is, however, a different term used to describe verbs when the action of the verb is performed on/to/at/etc. something. That term is transitive verb.




    transitive verb is one that is used with an object: a noun, phrase, or pronoun that refers to the person or thing that is affected by the action of the verb. In the following sentences, admire, maintain, face, and love are transitive verbs:



    I admire your courage.



    We need to maintain product quality.



    I couldn’t face him today.



    She loves animals.








    share|improve this answer












    share|improve this answer



    share|improve this answer










    answered Mar 24 at 18:57









    R MacR Mac

    2,436613




    2,436613












    • It's worth noting that transitive verbs are often made into past participles, like in the examples given in the question. Those are still past participles. There is no word to differentiate transitive participles from intransitive participles or from transitive verbs used where the object of the verb is not relevant to the meaning the participle is used to convey (and therefore is omitted from the use of the participle).

      – R Mac
      Mar 24 at 19:20

















    • It's worth noting that transitive verbs are often made into past participles, like in the examples given in the question. Those are still past participles. There is no word to differentiate transitive participles from intransitive participles or from transitive verbs used where the object of the verb is not relevant to the meaning the participle is used to convey (and therefore is omitted from the use of the participle).

      – R Mac
      Mar 24 at 19:20
















    It's worth noting that transitive verbs are often made into past participles, like in the examples given in the question. Those are still past participles. There is no word to differentiate transitive participles from intransitive participles or from transitive verbs used where the object of the verb is not relevant to the meaning the participle is used to convey (and therefore is omitted from the use of the participle).

    – R Mac
    Mar 24 at 19:20





    It's worth noting that transitive verbs are often made into past participles, like in the examples given in the question. Those are still past participles. There is no word to differentiate transitive participles from intransitive participles or from transitive verbs used where the object of the verb is not relevant to the meaning the participle is used to convey (and therefore is omitted from the use of the participle).

    – R Mac
    Mar 24 at 19:20











    2














    The -ed in all of your examples is a past-participle suffix. A past participle is not a derived form: rather, it is an inflected form of a verb (assuming you accept the distinction between derivation and inflection as grammatical processes in English). Most past participles end in -ed, but some end in -⁠(e)n instead (like beaten) and some don't end in either -ed or -(e)n (like stood or hurt). The past participle can have a passive meaning, so it can also be called a "passive participle". In the context of English, "past participle" and "passive participle" refer to the same verb form.



    But not all words ending in -ed are verb forms. Words belonging to other parts of speech can be derived from past participles. I think the most common type of derivation is past participle → adjective. Since verbs and adjectives are distinct parts of speech, it's best not to refer to such adjectives as "participles": instead, they can be called departicipial adjectives (a synonymous term is "participial adjectives"), which lets us reserve the term participle for the inflected form of the verb. That said, it's not always possible to figure out whether a word is a participle or a departicipial adjective.



    Here are some common texts for finding out whether a word is an adjective or a verb:



    • Can it be preceded by very? If so, it's an adjective. This test doesn't give positive results for me for any of your phrases. (But note that this test only works one way: it can't tell you that a word isn't an adjective. There are some adjectives that can't be preceded by very.)


    • Can it be preceded by carefully? If so, it's a verb. For me, this test indicates that the -ed words in all of your examples could be verbs.


    • Can you add the prefix un- (with the sense of "not", not with a sense of reversal)? If so, it's probably an adjective. For me, this test indicates that calibrated at least can be an adjective (since we certainly can say "an uncalibrated device"). The situation is less clear for distributed, destroyed and founded. There are dictionary entries for undistributed and undestroyed, but "an undistributed product" and "an undestroyed house" both sound a bit weird to me. Unfounded clearly exists as the negation of a different sense of the word founded, but *"an unfounded com­pany" doesn't seem acceptable to me.


    There are other possible tests, but I can't describe all of them. Some sources suggest that word order might be relevant, but I believe this is a mistaken view, so I haven't included this as a test.



    I think I've made it clear from what I've said above that there are many words ending in -ed that are not past participles/passive participles. (Most obviously, many past-tense verb forms end in -ed, but they are definitely not participles.)






    share|improve this answer

























    • Right: ideas can be unfounded, but probably not companies.

      – tchrist
      Mar 24 at 22:45











    • This is a very good answer. At the risk of making things harder than they need be, I cannot help but wonder whether it also applies to such things as hard-boiled eggs with hard-set egg yolks, hard-bound books, hand-drawn illustrations, horse-drawn carriages, hard-handed despots, hard-bitten veterans, hard-nosed detectives, hard-hearted lovers, hard-fought battles, hard-won victories, and ill-gotten gains.

      – tchrist
      Mar 24 at 22:57











    • I though the word "participle" meant "verb form used as an adjective"; in my understanding, the "-ing" form of a verb can be referred to as a participle or a gerund, depending on whether it's used as a verb or a noun.

      – No Name
      Mar 25 at 5:42











    • @NoName: Terminology in this area is a bit confusing. A verb in participle form can be said to be "used as an adjective", in that it can appear in many of the same contexts as an adjective (for example, after a form of "to be"). But many linguists would say that a verb does not become an adjective just by being used this way.

      – sumelic
      Mar 25 at 5:51







    • 1





      @NoName: Likewise, there is a distinction between -ing forms that are verbs "used as nouns", e.g. in contexts like "Carefully building relationships is an important element of success" ("building" here would traditionally be called a gerund) and -ing forms that actually are nouns, such as "building" in "The careful building of relationships is an important element of success" (this type of noun can be called a "gerundial noun"; see my question here: Is “programming” not a noun?).

      – sumelic
      Mar 25 at 5:51
















    2














    The -ed in all of your examples is a past-participle suffix. A past participle is not a derived form: rather, it is an inflected form of a verb (assuming you accept the distinction between derivation and inflection as grammatical processes in English). Most past participles end in -ed, but some end in -⁠(e)n instead (like beaten) and some don't end in either -ed or -(e)n (like stood or hurt). The past participle can have a passive meaning, so it can also be called a "passive participle". In the context of English, "past participle" and "passive participle" refer to the same verb form.



    But not all words ending in -ed are verb forms. Words belonging to other parts of speech can be derived from past participles. I think the most common type of derivation is past participle → adjective. Since verbs and adjectives are distinct parts of speech, it's best not to refer to such adjectives as "participles": instead, they can be called departicipial adjectives (a synonymous term is "participial adjectives"), which lets us reserve the term participle for the inflected form of the verb. That said, it's not always possible to figure out whether a word is a participle or a departicipial adjective.



    Here are some common texts for finding out whether a word is an adjective or a verb:



    • Can it be preceded by very? If so, it's an adjective. This test doesn't give positive results for me for any of your phrases. (But note that this test only works one way: it can't tell you that a word isn't an adjective. There are some adjectives that can't be preceded by very.)


    • Can it be preceded by carefully? If so, it's a verb. For me, this test indicates that the -ed words in all of your examples could be verbs.


    • Can you add the prefix un- (with the sense of "not", not with a sense of reversal)? If so, it's probably an adjective. For me, this test indicates that calibrated at least can be an adjective (since we certainly can say "an uncalibrated device"). The situation is less clear for distributed, destroyed and founded. There are dictionary entries for undistributed and undestroyed, but "an undistributed product" and "an undestroyed house" both sound a bit weird to me. Unfounded clearly exists as the negation of a different sense of the word founded, but *"an unfounded com­pany" doesn't seem acceptable to me.


    There are other possible tests, but I can't describe all of them. Some sources suggest that word order might be relevant, but I believe this is a mistaken view, so I haven't included this as a test.



    I think I've made it clear from what I've said above that there are many words ending in -ed that are not past participles/passive participles. (Most obviously, many past-tense verb forms end in -ed, but they are definitely not participles.)






    share|improve this answer

























    • Right: ideas can be unfounded, but probably not companies.

      – tchrist
      Mar 24 at 22:45











    • This is a very good answer. At the risk of making things harder than they need be, I cannot help but wonder whether it also applies to such things as hard-boiled eggs with hard-set egg yolks, hard-bound books, hand-drawn illustrations, horse-drawn carriages, hard-handed despots, hard-bitten veterans, hard-nosed detectives, hard-hearted lovers, hard-fought battles, hard-won victories, and ill-gotten gains.

      – tchrist
      Mar 24 at 22:57











    • I though the word "participle" meant "verb form used as an adjective"; in my understanding, the "-ing" form of a verb can be referred to as a participle or a gerund, depending on whether it's used as a verb or a noun.

      – No Name
      Mar 25 at 5:42











    • @NoName: Terminology in this area is a bit confusing. A verb in participle form can be said to be "used as an adjective", in that it can appear in many of the same contexts as an adjective (for example, after a form of "to be"). But many linguists would say that a verb does not become an adjective just by being used this way.

      – sumelic
      Mar 25 at 5:51







    • 1





      @NoName: Likewise, there is a distinction between -ing forms that are verbs "used as nouns", e.g. in contexts like "Carefully building relationships is an important element of success" ("building" here would traditionally be called a gerund) and -ing forms that actually are nouns, such as "building" in "The careful building of relationships is an important element of success" (this type of noun can be called a "gerundial noun"; see my question here: Is “programming” not a noun?).

      – sumelic
      Mar 25 at 5:51














    2












    2








    2







    The -ed in all of your examples is a past-participle suffix. A past participle is not a derived form: rather, it is an inflected form of a verb (assuming you accept the distinction between derivation and inflection as grammatical processes in English). Most past participles end in -ed, but some end in -⁠(e)n instead (like beaten) and some don't end in either -ed or -(e)n (like stood or hurt). The past participle can have a passive meaning, so it can also be called a "passive participle". In the context of English, "past participle" and "passive participle" refer to the same verb form.



    But not all words ending in -ed are verb forms. Words belonging to other parts of speech can be derived from past participles. I think the most common type of derivation is past participle → adjective. Since verbs and adjectives are distinct parts of speech, it's best not to refer to such adjectives as "participles": instead, they can be called departicipial adjectives (a synonymous term is "participial adjectives"), which lets us reserve the term participle for the inflected form of the verb. That said, it's not always possible to figure out whether a word is a participle or a departicipial adjective.



    Here are some common texts for finding out whether a word is an adjective or a verb:



    • Can it be preceded by very? If so, it's an adjective. This test doesn't give positive results for me for any of your phrases. (But note that this test only works one way: it can't tell you that a word isn't an adjective. There are some adjectives that can't be preceded by very.)


    • Can it be preceded by carefully? If so, it's a verb. For me, this test indicates that the -ed words in all of your examples could be verbs.


    • Can you add the prefix un- (with the sense of "not", not with a sense of reversal)? If so, it's probably an adjective. For me, this test indicates that calibrated at least can be an adjective (since we certainly can say "an uncalibrated device"). The situation is less clear for distributed, destroyed and founded. There are dictionary entries for undistributed and undestroyed, but "an undistributed product" and "an undestroyed house" both sound a bit weird to me. Unfounded clearly exists as the negation of a different sense of the word founded, but *"an unfounded com­pany" doesn't seem acceptable to me.


    There are other possible tests, but I can't describe all of them. Some sources suggest that word order might be relevant, but I believe this is a mistaken view, so I haven't included this as a test.



    I think I've made it clear from what I've said above that there are many words ending in -ed that are not past participles/passive participles. (Most obviously, many past-tense verb forms end in -ed, but they are definitely not participles.)






    share|improve this answer















    The -ed in all of your examples is a past-participle suffix. A past participle is not a derived form: rather, it is an inflected form of a verb (assuming you accept the distinction between derivation and inflection as grammatical processes in English). Most past participles end in -ed, but some end in -⁠(e)n instead (like beaten) and some don't end in either -ed or -(e)n (like stood or hurt). The past participle can have a passive meaning, so it can also be called a "passive participle". In the context of English, "past participle" and "passive participle" refer to the same verb form.



    But not all words ending in -ed are verb forms. Words belonging to other parts of speech can be derived from past participles. I think the most common type of derivation is past participle → adjective. Since verbs and adjectives are distinct parts of speech, it's best not to refer to such adjectives as "participles": instead, they can be called departicipial adjectives (a synonymous term is "participial adjectives"), which lets us reserve the term participle for the inflected form of the verb. That said, it's not always possible to figure out whether a word is a participle or a departicipial adjective.



    Here are some common texts for finding out whether a word is an adjective or a verb:



    • Can it be preceded by very? If so, it's an adjective. This test doesn't give positive results for me for any of your phrases. (But note that this test only works one way: it can't tell you that a word isn't an adjective. There are some adjectives that can't be preceded by very.)


    • Can it be preceded by carefully? If so, it's a verb. For me, this test indicates that the -ed words in all of your examples could be verbs.


    • Can you add the prefix un- (with the sense of "not", not with a sense of reversal)? If so, it's probably an adjective. For me, this test indicates that calibrated at least can be an adjective (since we certainly can say "an uncalibrated device"). The situation is less clear for distributed, destroyed and founded. There are dictionary entries for undistributed and undestroyed, but "an undistributed product" and "an undestroyed house" both sound a bit weird to me. Unfounded clearly exists as the negation of a different sense of the word founded, but *"an unfounded com­pany" doesn't seem acceptable to me.


    There are other possible tests, but I can't describe all of them. Some sources suggest that word order might be relevant, but I believe this is a mistaken view, so I haven't included this as a test.



    I think I've made it clear from what I've said above that there are many words ending in -ed that are not past participles/passive participles. (Most obviously, many past-tense verb forms end in -ed, but they are definitely not participles.)







    share|improve this answer














    share|improve this answer



    share|improve this answer








    edited Mar 24 at 22:46

























    answered Mar 24 at 22:26









    sumelicsumelic

    50.7k8121228




    50.7k8121228












    • Right: ideas can be unfounded, but probably not companies.

      – tchrist
      Mar 24 at 22:45











    • This is a very good answer. At the risk of making things harder than they need be, I cannot help but wonder whether it also applies to such things as hard-boiled eggs with hard-set egg yolks, hard-bound books, hand-drawn illustrations, horse-drawn carriages, hard-handed despots, hard-bitten veterans, hard-nosed detectives, hard-hearted lovers, hard-fought battles, hard-won victories, and ill-gotten gains.

      – tchrist
      Mar 24 at 22:57











    • I though the word "participle" meant "verb form used as an adjective"; in my understanding, the "-ing" form of a verb can be referred to as a participle or a gerund, depending on whether it's used as a verb or a noun.

      – No Name
      Mar 25 at 5:42











    • @NoName: Terminology in this area is a bit confusing. A verb in participle form can be said to be "used as an adjective", in that it can appear in many of the same contexts as an adjective (for example, after a form of "to be"). But many linguists would say that a verb does not become an adjective just by being used this way.

      – sumelic
      Mar 25 at 5:51







    • 1





      @NoName: Likewise, there is a distinction between -ing forms that are verbs "used as nouns", e.g. in contexts like "Carefully building relationships is an important element of success" ("building" here would traditionally be called a gerund) and -ing forms that actually are nouns, such as "building" in "The careful building of relationships is an important element of success" (this type of noun can be called a "gerundial noun"; see my question here: Is “programming” not a noun?).

      – sumelic
      Mar 25 at 5:51


















    • Right: ideas can be unfounded, but probably not companies.

      – tchrist
      Mar 24 at 22:45











    • This is a very good answer. At the risk of making things harder than they need be, I cannot help but wonder whether it also applies to such things as hard-boiled eggs with hard-set egg yolks, hard-bound books, hand-drawn illustrations, horse-drawn carriages, hard-handed despots, hard-bitten veterans, hard-nosed detectives, hard-hearted lovers, hard-fought battles, hard-won victories, and ill-gotten gains.

      – tchrist
      Mar 24 at 22:57











    • I though the word "participle" meant "verb form used as an adjective"; in my understanding, the "-ing" form of a verb can be referred to as a participle or a gerund, depending on whether it's used as a verb or a noun.

      – No Name
      Mar 25 at 5:42











    • @NoName: Terminology in this area is a bit confusing. A verb in participle form can be said to be "used as an adjective", in that it can appear in many of the same contexts as an adjective (for example, after a form of "to be"). But many linguists would say that a verb does not become an adjective just by being used this way.

      – sumelic
      Mar 25 at 5:51







    • 1





      @NoName: Likewise, there is a distinction between -ing forms that are verbs "used as nouns", e.g. in contexts like "Carefully building relationships is an important element of success" ("building" here would traditionally be called a gerund) and -ing forms that actually are nouns, such as "building" in "The careful building of relationships is an important element of success" (this type of noun can be called a "gerundial noun"; see my question here: Is “programming” not a noun?).

      – sumelic
      Mar 25 at 5:51

















    Right: ideas can be unfounded, but probably not companies.

    – tchrist
    Mar 24 at 22:45





    Right: ideas can be unfounded, but probably not companies.

    – tchrist
    Mar 24 at 22:45













    This is a very good answer. At the risk of making things harder than they need be, I cannot help but wonder whether it also applies to such things as hard-boiled eggs with hard-set egg yolks, hard-bound books, hand-drawn illustrations, horse-drawn carriages, hard-handed despots, hard-bitten veterans, hard-nosed detectives, hard-hearted lovers, hard-fought battles, hard-won victories, and ill-gotten gains.

    – tchrist
    Mar 24 at 22:57





    This is a very good answer. At the risk of making things harder than they need be, I cannot help but wonder whether it also applies to such things as hard-boiled eggs with hard-set egg yolks, hard-bound books, hand-drawn illustrations, horse-drawn carriages, hard-handed despots, hard-bitten veterans, hard-nosed detectives, hard-hearted lovers, hard-fought battles, hard-won victories, and ill-gotten gains.

    – tchrist
    Mar 24 at 22:57













    I though the word "participle" meant "verb form used as an adjective"; in my understanding, the "-ing" form of a verb can be referred to as a participle or a gerund, depending on whether it's used as a verb or a noun.

    – No Name
    Mar 25 at 5:42





    I though the word "participle" meant "verb form used as an adjective"; in my understanding, the "-ing" form of a verb can be referred to as a participle or a gerund, depending on whether it's used as a verb or a noun.

    – No Name
    Mar 25 at 5:42













    @NoName: Terminology in this area is a bit confusing. A verb in participle form can be said to be "used as an adjective", in that it can appear in many of the same contexts as an adjective (for example, after a form of "to be"). But many linguists would say that a verb does not become an adjective just by being used this way.

    – sumelic
    Mar 25 at 5:51






    @NoName: Terminology in this area is a bit confusing. A verb in participle form can be said to be "used as an adjective", in that it can appear in many of the same contexts as an adjective (for example, after a form of "to be"). But many linguists would say that a verb does not become an adjective just by being used this way.

    – sumelic
    Mar 25 at 5:51





    1




    1





    @NoName: Likewise, there is a distinction between -ing forms that are verbs "used as nouns", e.g. in contexts like "Carefully building relationships is an important element of success" ("building" here would traditionally be called a gerund) and -ing forms that actually are nouns, such as "building" in "The careful building of relationships is an important element of success" (this type of noun can be called a "gerundial noun"; see my question here: Is “programming” not a noun?).

    – sumelic
    Mar 25 at 5:51






    @NoName: Likewise, there is a distinction between -ing forms that are verbs "used as nouns", e.g. in contexts like "Carefully building relationships is an important element of success" ("building" here would traditionally be called a gerund) and -ing forms that actually are nouns, such as "building" in "The careful building of relationships is an important element of success" (this type of noun can be called a "gerundial noun"; see my question here: Is “programming” not a noun?).

    – sumelic
    Mar 25 at 5:51












    0














    I don't think the tense of the verb is the point of your question. I suppose a simple answer is they are "actions" as verbs, but thank you for the additional input in the comments. More specifically, they are "objective actions", or you might possibly consider "operative actions" as well (because they are exerting force or influence on something).



    https://www.thefreedictionary.com/objective



    https://www.thefreedictionary.com/operative






    share|improve this answer



























      0














      I don't think the tense of the verb is the point of your question. I suppose a simple answer is they are "actions" as verbs, but thank you for the additional input in the comments. More specifically, they are "objective actions", or you might possibly consider "operative actions" as well (because they are exerting force or influence on something).



      https://www.thefreedictionary.com/objective



      https://www.thefreedictionary.com/operative






      share|improve this answer

























        0












        0








        0







        I don't think the tense of the verb is the point of your question. I suppose a simple answer is they are "actions" as verbs, but thank you for the additional input in the comments. More specifically, they are "objective actions", or you might possibly consider "operative actions" as well (because they are exerting force or influence on something).



        https://www.thefreedictionary.com/objective



        https://www.thefreedictionary.com/operative






        share|improve this answer













        I don't think the tense of the verb is the point of your question. I suppose a simple answer is they are "actions" as verbs, but thank you for the additional input in the comments. More specifically, they are "objective actions", or you might possibly consider "operative actions" as well (because they are exerting force or influence on something).



        https://www.thefreedictionary.com/objective



        https://www.thefreedictionary.com/operative







        share|improve this answer












        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer










        answered Mar 24 at 11:58









        user22542user22542

        3,8511512




        3,8511512





















            -1














            This is really simple. It does not need a whole note for explanation.



            The "ed" is grammatically referred as the past tense marker ...... the past participle



            However, don't be confused when the past tense marker is added to a verb to perform the function of an Adjective.



            For instance,



            1. A distributed products

            2. A designed artifact

            3. The faded car





            share|improve this answer




















            • 1





              Simple past tense and past participle serve very different purposes in a sentence. Simple past tense is used to show the verb happened in the past, while past participle is the verb form that acts as an adjective (being something that happened to the modified noun in the past). Also, the phrase "past tense marker" is not used to reference the "-ed" suffix because irregular verbs (e.g., "break" / "broke" / "broken") do not match that pattern.

              – R Mac
              Mar 26 at 1:23












            • All right, perfectly perfect. However, I meant this past tense marker "-ed" is attached to regular verbs. Hence, the past participles perform the functions of an Adjective.

              – user341285
              Mar 26 at 7:19















            -1














            This is really simple. It does not need a whole note for explanation.



            The "ed" is grammatically referred as the past tense marker ...... the past participle



            However, don't be confused when the past tense marker is added to a verb to perform the function of an Adjective.



            For instance,



            1. A distributed products

            2. A designed artifact

            3. The faded car





            share|improve this answer




















            • 1





              Simple past tense and past participle serve very different purposes in a sentence. Simple past tense is used to show the verb happened in the past, while past participle is the verb form that acts as an adjective (being something that happened to the modified noun in the past). Also, the phrase "past tense marker" is not used to reference the "-ed" suffix because irregular verbs (e.g., "break" / "broke" / "broken") do not match that pattern.

              – R Mac
              Mar 26 at 1:23












            • All right, perfectly perfect. However, I meant this past tense marker "-ed" is attached to regular verbs. Hence, the past participles perform the functions of an Adjective.

              – user341285
              Mar 26 at 7:19













            -1












            -1








            -1







            This is really simple. It does not need a whole note for explanation.



            The "ed" is grammatically referred as the past tense marker ...... the past participle



            However, don't be confused when the past tense marker is added to a verb to perform the function of an Adjective.



            For instance,



            1. A distributed products

            2. A designed artifact

            3. The faded car





            share|improve this answer















            This is really simple. It does not need a whole note for explanation.



            The "ed" is grammatically referred as the past tense marker ...... the past participle



            However, don't be confused when the past tense marker is added to a verb to perform the function of an Adjective.



            For instance,



            1. A distributed products

            2. A designed artifact

            3. The faded car






            share|improve this answer














            share|improve this answer



            share|improve this answer








            edited Mar 25 at 20:12

























            answered Mar 25 at 20:02









            user341285user341285

            705




            705







            • 1





              Simple past tense and past participle serve very different purposes in a sentence. Simple past tense is used to show the verb happened in the past, while past participle is the verb form that acts as an adjective (being something that happened to the modified noun in the past). Also, the phrase "past tense marker" is not used to reference the "-ed" suffix because irregular verbs (e.g., "break" / "broke" / "broken") do not match that pattern.

              – R Mac
              Mar 26 at 1:23












            • All right, perfectly perfect. However, I meant this past tense marker "-ed" is attached to regular verbs. Hence, the past participles perform the functions of an Adjective.

              – user341285
              Mar 26 at 7:19












            • 1





              Simple past tense and past participle serve very different purposes in a sentence. Simple past tense is used to show the verb happened in the past, while past participle is the verb form that acts as an adjective (being something that happened to the modified noun in the past). Also, the phrase "past tense marker" is not used to reference the "-ed" suffix because irregular verbs (e.g., "break" / "broke" / "broken") do not match that pattern.

              – R Mac
              Mar 26 at 1:23












            • All right, perfectly perfect. However, I meant this past tense marker "-ed" is attached to regular verbs. Hence, the past participles perform the functions of an Adjective.

              – user341285
              Mar 26 at 7:19







            1




            1





            Simple past tense and past participle serve very different purposes in a sentence. Simple past tense is used to show the verb happened in the past, while past participle is the verb form that acts as an adjective (being something that happened to the modified noun in the past). Also, the phrase "past tense marker" is not used to reference the "-ed" suffix because irregular verbs (e.g., "break" / "broke" / "broken") do not match that pattern.

            – R Mac
            Mar 26 at 1:23






            Simple past tense and past participle serve very different purposes in a sentence. Simple past tense is used to show the verb happened in the past, while past participle is the verb form that acts as an adjective (being something that happened to the modified noun in the past). Also, the phrase "past tense marker" is not used to reference the "-ed" suffix because irregular verbs (e.g., "break" / "broke" / "broken") do not match that pattern.

            – R Mac
            Mar 26 at 1:23














            All right, perfectly perfect. However, I meant this past tense marker "-ed" is attached to regular verbs. Hence, the past participles perform the functions of an Adjective.

            – user341285
            Mar 26 at 7:19





            All right, perfectly perfect. However, I meant this past tense marker "-ed" is attached to regular verbs. Hence, the past participles perform the functions of an Adjective.

            – user341285
            Mar 26 at 7:19

















            draft saved

            draft discarded
















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to English Language & Usage Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid


            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fenglish.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f491077%2fwhat-is-the-gram-mat-i-cal-term-for-ed-words-like-these%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Færeyskur hestur Heimild | Tengill | Tilvísanir | LeiðsagnarvalRossið - síða um færeyska hrossið á færeyskuGott ár hjá færeyska hestinum

            He _____ here since 1970 . Answer needed [closed]What does “since he was so high” mean?Meaning of “catch birds for”?How do I ensure “since” takes the meaning I want?“Who cares here” meaningWhat does “right round toward” mean?the time tense (had now been detected)What does the phrase “ring around the roses” mean here?Correct usage of “visited upon”Meaning of “foiled rail sabotage bid”It was the third time I had gone to Rome or It is the third time I had been to Rome

            Slayer Innehåll Historia | Stil, komposition och lyrik | Bandets betydelse och framgångar | Sidoprojekt och samarbeten | Kontroverser | Medlemmar | Utmärkelser och nomineringar | Turnéer och festivaler | Diskografi | Referenser | Externa länkar | Navigeringsmenywww.slayer.net”Metal Massacre vol. 1””Metal Massacre vol. 3””Metal Massacre Volume III””Show No Mercy””Haunting the Chapel””Live Undead””Hell Awaits””Reign in Blood””Reign in Blood””Gold & Platinum – Reign in Blood””Golden Gods Awards Winners”originalet”Kerrang! Hall Of Fame””Slayer Looks Back On 37-Year Career In New Video Series: Part Two””South of Heaven””Gold & Platinum – South of Heaven””Seasons in the Abyss””Gold & Platinum - Seasons in the Abyss””Divine Intervention””Divine Intervention - Release group by Slayer””Gold & Platinum - Divine Intervention””Live Intrusion””Undisputed Attitude””Abolish Government/Superficial Love””Release “Slatanic Slaughter: A Tribute to Slayer” by Various Artists””Diabolus in Musica””Soundtrack to the Apocalypse””God Hates Us All””Systematic - Relationships””War at the Warfield””Gold & Platinum - War at the Warfield””Soundtrack to the Apocalypse””Gold & Platinum - Still Reigning””Metallica, Slayer, Iron Mauden Among Winners At Metal Hammer Awards””Eternal Pyre””Eternal Pyre - Slayer release group””Eternal Pyre””Metal Storm Awards 2006””Kerrang! Hall Of Fame””Slayer Wins 'Best Metal' Grammy Award””Slayer Guitarist Jeff Hanneman Dies””Bullet-For My Valentine booed at Metal Hammer Golden Gods Awards””Unholy Aliance””The End Of Slayer?””Slayer: We Could Thrash Out Two More Albums If We're Fast Enough...””'The Unholy Alliance: Chapter III' UK Dates Added”originalet”Megadeth And Slayer To Co-Headline 'Canadian Carnage' Trek”originalet”World Painted Blood””Release “World Painted Blood” by Slayer””Metallica Heading To Cinemas””Slayer, Megadeth To Join Forces For 'European Carnage' Tour - Dec. 18, 2010”originalet”Slayer's Hanneman Contracts Acute Infection; Band To Bring In Guest Guitarist””Cannibal Corpse's Pat O'Brien Will Step In As Slayer's Guest Guitarist”originalet”Slayer’s Jeff Hanneman Dead at 49””Dave Lombardo Says He Made Only $67,000 In 2011 While Touring With Slayer””Slayer: We Do Not Agree With Dave Lombardo's Substance Or Timeline Of Events””Slayer Welcomes Drummer Paul Bostaph Back To The Fold””Slayer Hope to Unveil Never-Before-Heard Jeff Hanneman Material on Next Album””Slayer Debut New Song 'Implode' During Surprise Golden Gods Appearance””Release group Repentless by Slayer””Repentless - Slayer - Credits””Slayer””Metal Storm Awards 2015””Slayer - to release comic book "Repentless #1"””Slayer To Release 'Repentless' 6.66" Vinyl Box Set””BREAKING NEWS: Slayer Announce Farewell Tour””Slayer Recruit Lamb of God, Anthrax, Behemoth + Testament for Final Tour””Slayer lägger ner efter 37 år””Slayer Announces Second North American Leg Of 'Final' Tour””Final World Tour””Slayer Announces Final European Tour With Lamb of God, Anthrax And Obituary””Slayer To Tour Europe With Lamb of God, Anthrax And Obituary””Slayer To Play 'Last French Show Ever' At Next Year's Hellfst””Slayer's Final World Tour Will Extend Into 2019””Death Angel's Rob Cavestany On Slayer's 'Farewell' Tour: 'Some Of Us Could See This Coming'””Testament Has No Plans To Retire Anytime Soon, Says Chuck Billy””Anthrax's Scott Ian On Slayer's 'Farewell' Tour Plans: 'I Was Surprised And I Wasn't Surprised'””Slayer””Slayer's Morbid Schlock””Review/Rock; For Slayer, the Mania Is the Message””Slayer - Biography””Slayer - Reign In Blood”originalet”Dave Lombardo””An exclusive oral history of Slayer”originalet”Exclusive! Interview With Slayer Guitarist Jeff Hanneman”originalet”Thinking Out Loud: Slayer's Kerry King on hair metal, Satan and being polite””Slayer Lyrics””Slayer - Biography””Most influential artists for extreme metal music””Slayer - Reign in Blood””Slayer guitarist Jeff Hanneman dies aged 49””Slatanic Slaughter: A Tribute to Slayer””Gateway to Hell: A Tribute to Slayer””Covered In Blood””Slayer: The Origins of Thrash in San Francisco, CA.””Why They Rule - #6 Slayer”originalet”Guitar World's 100 Greatest Heavy Metal Guitarists Of All Time”originalet”The fans have spoken: Slayer comes out on top in readers' polls”originalet”Tribute to Jeff Hanneman (1964-2013)””Lamb Of God Frontman: We Sound Like A Slayer Rip-Off””BEHEMOTH Frontman Pays Tribute To SLAYER's JEFF HANNEMAN””Slayer, Hatebreed Doing Double Duty On This Year's Ozzfest””System of a Down””Lacuna Coil’s Andrea Ferro Talks Influences, Skateboarding, Band Origins + More””Slayer - Reign in Blood””Into The Lungs of Hell””Slayer rules - en utställning om fans””Slayer and Their Fans Slashed Through a No-Holds-Barred Night at Gas Monkey””Home””Slayer””Gold & Platinum - The Big 4 Live from Sofia, Bulgaria””Exclusive! Interview With Slayer Guitarist Kerry King””2008-02-23: Wiltern, Los Angeles, CA, USA””Slayer's Kerry King To Perform With Megadeth Tonight! - Oct. 21, 2010”originalet”Dave Lombardo - Biography”Slayer Case DismissedArkiveradUltimate Classic Rock: Slayer guitarist Jeff Hanneman dead at 49.”Slayer: "We could never do any thing like Some Kind Of Monster..."””Cannibal Corpse'S Pat O'Brien Will Step In As Slayer'S Guest Guitarist | The Official Slayer Site”originalet”Slayer Wins 'Best Metal' Grammy Award””Slayer Guitarist Jeff Hanneman Dies””Kerrang! Awards 2006 Blog: Kerrang! Hall Of Fame””Kerrang! Awards 2013: Kerrang! Legend”originalet”Metallica, Slayer, Iron Maien Among Winners At Metal Hammer Awards””Metal Hammer Golden Gods Awards””Bullet For My Valentine Booed At Metal Hammer Golden Gods Awards””Metal Storm Awards 2006””Metal Storm Awards 2015””Slayer's Concert History””Slayer - Relationships””Slayer - Releases”Slayers officiella webbplatsSlayer på MusicBrainzOfficiell webbplatsSlayerSlayerr1373445760000 0001 1540 47353068615-5086262726cb13906545x(data)6033143kn20030215029