“provide X to someone” vs “provide X for someone”Usage of the verb “provide”Preposition with verb “provide”Is “get someone up” the same as “wake someone up”?“provide” vs. “provide with”“Provide you with something” vs “Provide you something”?Ending a sentence with a preposition?What is the right preposition after “provide”?Is “fished” a transitive verb in “I fished around in my pocket for my keys”?“Provide us with X” or “provide us X”?Using 'except for' in front of a bare or to-infinitive

Does a creature that is immune to a condition still make a saving throw?

When and why did journal article titles become descriptive, rather than creatively allusive?

Please, smoke with good manners

Python "triplet" dictionary?

Can solid acids and bases have pH values? If not, how are they classified as acids or bases?

Will tsunami waves travel forever if there was no land?

Packing rectangles: Does rotation ever help?

Is GOCE a satellite or aircraft?

Minimum value of 4 digit number divided by sum of its digits

Sci-fi novel series with instant travel between planets through gates. A river runs through the gates

In Proverbs 14:34, is sin a disgrace to a people, or is mercy a sin-offering?

When India mathematicians did know Euclid's Elements?

Do generators produce a fixed load?

In gnome-terminal only 2 out of 3 zoom keys work

Pressure to defend the relevance of one's area of mathematics

Can I get candy for a Pokemon I haven't caught yet?

Find the coordinate of two line segments that are perpendicular

If Earth is tilted, why is Polaris always above the same spot?

Examples of non trivial equivalence relations , I mean equivalence relations without the expression " same ... as" in their definition?

Any examples of headwear for races with animal ears?

Will a top journal at least read my introduction?

Does the EU Common Fisheries Policy cover British Overseas Territories?

You look catfish vs You look like a catfish

Unexpected email from Yorkshire Bank



“provide X to someone” vs “provide X for someone”


Usage of the verb “provide”Preposition with verb “provide”Is “get someone up” the same as “wake someone up”?“provide” vs. “provide with”“Provide you with something” vs “Provide you something”?Ending a sentence with a preposition?What is the right preposition after “provide”?Is “fished” a transitive verb in “I fished around in my pocket for my keys”?“Provide us with X” or “provide us X”?Using 'except for' in front of a bare or to-infinitive






.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;








1















I am confused by the different explanations in the following two dictionaries.



Macmillan says “provide A to B”, while The Free Dictionary says it is wrong and tells us not to say “provide A to B”, insisting that we not use any prepositions except FOR. That is why I am much confused.



Which of the two is GRAMMATICALLY correct in the States and Britain regardless of whether it is used or not in daily life? And could you suggest any authentic sources about this?




  • We provide legal advice and services to our clients. (Macmillan)


  • The animals provide food for their young. (TFD)
    Be Careful!

    Don't use any preposition except for in sentences like these.

    Don't say, for example 'The animals provide food to their young'.











share|improve this question



















  • 2





    Scroll down the Macmillan Dictionary site to phrasal verbs and select "provide for". That describes the usage that is operative in your animals example.

    – Lawrence
    Mar 28 at 10:07












  • Typically, instead of saying "provide A to B", I would say "provide B with A". This makes the receiver the direct object and the thing being given the indirect object.

    – Tim Foster
    Mar 28 at 10:32


















1















I am confused by the different explanations in the following two dictionaries.



Macmillan says “provide A to B”, while The Free Dictionary says it is wrong and tells us not to say “provide A to B”, insisting that we not use any prepositions except FOR. That is why I am much confused.



Which of the two is GRAMMATICALLY correct in the States and Britain regardless of whether it is used or not in daily life? And could you suggest any authentic sources about this?




  • We provide legal advice and services to our clients. (Macmillan)


  • The animals provide food for their young. (TFD)
    Be Careful!

    Don't use any preposition except for in sentences like these.

    Don't say, for example 'The animals provide food to their young'.











share|improve this question



















  • 2





    Scroll down the Macmillan Dictionary site to phrasal verbs and select "provide for". That describes the usage that is operative in your animals example.

    – Lawrence
    Mar 28 at 10:07












  • Typically, instead of saying "provide A to B", I would say "provide B with A". This makes the receiver the direct object and the thing being given the indirect object.

    – Tim Foster
    Mar 28 at 10:32














1












1








1








I am confused by the different explanations in the following two dictionaries.



Macmillan says “provide A to B”, while The Free Dictionary says it is wrong and tells us not to say “provide A to B”, insisting that we not use any prepositions except FOR. That is why I am much confused.



Which of the two is GRAMMATICALLY correct in the States and Britain regardless of whether it is used or not in daily life? And could you suggest any authentic sources about this?




  • We provide legal advice and services to our clients. (Macmillan)


  • The animals provide food for their young. (TFD)
    Be Careful!

    Don't use any preposition except for in sentences like these.

    Don't say, for example 'The animals provide food to their young'.











share|improve this question
















I am confused by the different explanations in the following two dictionaries.



Macmillan says “provide A to B”, while The Free Dictionary says it is wrong and tells us not to say “provide A to B”, insisting that we not use any prepositions except FOR. That is why I am much confused.



Which of the two is GRAMMATICALLY correct in the States and Britain regardless of whether it is used or not in daily life? And could you suggest any authentic sources about this?




  • We provide legal advice and services to our clients. (Macmillan)


  • The animals provide food for their young. (TFD)
    Be Careful!

    Don't use any preposition except for in sentences like these.

    Don't say, for example 'The animals provide food to their young'.








prepositions phrasal-verbs transitive-verbs






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited Mar 28 at 10:58









Mari-Lou A

63.5k57230469




63.5k57230469










asked Mar 28 at 10:00









Suwon KimSuwon Kim

376




376







  • 2





    Scroll down the Macmillan Dictionary site to phrasal verbs and select "provide for". That describes the usage that is operative in your animals example.

    – Lawrence
    Mar 28 at 10:07












  • Typically, instead of saying "provide A to B", I would say "provide B with A". This makes the receiver the direct object and the thing being given the indirect object.

    – Tim Foster
    Mar 28 at 10:32













  • 2





    Scroll down the Macmillan Dictionary site to phrasal verbs and select "provide for". That describes the usage that is operative in your animals example.

    – Lawrence
    Mar 28 at 10:07












  • Typically, instead of saying "provide A to B", I would say "provide B with A". This makes the receiver the direct object and the thing being given the indirect object.

    – Tim Foster
    Mar 28 at 10:32








2




2





Scroll down the Macmillan Dictionary site to phrasal verbs and select "provide for". That describes the usage that is operative in your animals example.

– Lawrence
Mar 28 at 10:07






Scroll down the Macmillan Dictionary site to phrasal verbs and select "provide for". That describes the usage that is operative in your animals example.

– Lawrence
Mar 28 at 10:07














Typically, instead of saying "provide A to B", I would say "provide B with A". This makes the receiver the direct object and the thing being given the indirect object.

– Tim Foster
Mar 28 at 10:32






Typically, instead of saying "provide A to B", I would say "provide B with A". This makes the receiver the direct object and the thing being given the indirect object.

– Tim Foster
Mar 28 at 10:32











2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















1














One can provide [basically] any X to Y.




However, "provide food for their young" means specifically: care for
them by giving them food.




We even have an idiom based on that:




This provides food for thought.




  • Parents provide for their children.

To provide for=to sustain or support physically or financially or in some other way that does not just mean to give or supply.



whereas: provide x to y just means: supply or give x to y.



There is also the idea of make provision for [arrange for]:



  • The will provided for their upkeep.

The will had a provision that set out a sum of money to do towards upkeep,of, say, properties.



provide for=care for in some way
provide [x] to=give or supply with no idea of "caring for" or "taking care of" as in being physically or financially responsible for.



  • That man always provided for his family. [financially supported]

  • That man always provided funds to his community organization. [gave funds or made funds available to]





share|improve this answer























  • Thank you for your kind answer. However, what do you think of the following explanation from Longman Dictionary? I can't find any information about the preposition 'to'. in Longman Dictionary. ldoceonline.com/dictionary/provide GRAMMAR: Patterns with provide • You provide something for someone: We provide information for parents. • You provide someone with something: We provide parents with information. ✗Don’t say: We provide parents information.

    – Suwon Kim
    Mar 29 at 10:09












  • @SuwonKim I agree with those entries. And they do not mean what I said is incorrect.

    – Lambie
    Mar 29 at 13:00











  • We provide information for parents. -The problem is that this sentence does not include any responsibility. I can't discriminate when to use 'to' and when to use 'for", because your explanation does not apply to the above sentence. I mean according to your explanation, 'We provide information to parents' should be correct, shouldn't it?

    – Suwon Kim
    Mar 30 at 14:50


















-1














Provide certainly has a meaning of "hand over" or "give to," so I can't see how it can be ungrammatical to use a "to" preposition in phrases using "provide."



You can also "provide an answer to a question." You certainly can "provide a shoulder to cry on." In either case, using "for" instead of "to" wouldn't make sense. You can say "provide a shoulder for her to cry on," however.



In other words, these are questions of coherent and natural-sounding phrasing, rather than strictly grammar, I believe.



"Provide for the common good" is an example of "provide" without an A and a B, by the way.



You can "provide for" something, or "provision" something, or "provide" something to someone.






share|improve this answer























  • Would you please check on the comments in the above if you don't mind?

    – Suwon Kim
    Mar 30 at 14:50











  • I agree with comment and answers that say you can "provide something to someone."

    – user8356
    Apr 1 at 12:45











Your Answer








StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "97"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);

else
createEditor();

);

function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);



);













draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fenglish.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f491694%2fprovide-x-to-someone-vs-provide-x-for-someone%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes








2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









1














One can provide [basically] any X to Y.




However, "provide food for their young" means specifically: care for
them by giving them food.




We even have an idiom based on that:




This provides food for thought.




  • Parents provide for their children.

To provide for=to sustain or support physically or financially or in some other way that does not just mean to give or supply.



whereas: provide x to y just means: supply or give x to y.



There is also the idea of make provision for [arrange for]:



  • The will provided for their upkeep.

The will had a provision that set out a sum of money to do towards upkeep,of, say, properties.



provide for=care for in some way
provide [x] to=give or supply with no idea of "caring for" or "taking care of" as in being physically or financially responsible for.



  • That man always provided for his family. [financially supported]

  • That man always provided funds to his community organization. [gave funds or made funds available to]





share|improve this answer























  • Thank you for your kind answer. However, what do you think of the following explanation from Longman Dictionary? I can't find any information about the preposition 'to'. in Longman Dictionary. ldoceonline.com/dictionary/provide GRAMMAR: Patterns with provide • You provide something for someone: We provide information for parents. • You provide someone with something: We provide parents with information. ✗Don’t say: We provide parents information.

    – Suwon Kim
    Mar 29 at 10:09












  • @SuwonKim I agree with those entries. And they do not mean what I said is incorrect.

    – Lambie
    Mar 29 at 13:00











  • We provide information for parents. -The problem is that this sentence does not include any responsibility. I can't discriminate when to use 'to' and when to use 'for", because your explanation does not apply to the above sentence. I mean according to your explanation, 'We provide information to parents' should be correct, shouldn't it?

    – Suwon Kim
    Mar 30 at 14:50















1














One can provide [basically] any X to Y.




However, "provide food for their young" means specifically: care for
them by giving them food.




We even have an idiom based on that:




This provides food for thought.




  • Parents provide for their children.

To provide for=to sustain or support physically or financially or in some other way that does not just mean to give or supply.



whereas: provide x to y just means: supply or give x to y.



There is also the idea of make provision for [arrange for]:



  • The will provided for their upkeep.

The will had a provision that set out a sum of money to do towards upkeep,of, say, properties.



provide for=care for in some way
provide [x] to=give or supply with no idea of "caring for" or "taking care of" as in being physically or financially responsible for.



  • That man always provided for his family. [financially supported]

  • That man always provided funds to his community organization. [gave funds or made funds available to]





share|improve this answer























  • Thank you for your kind answer. However, what do you think of the following explanation from Longman Dictionary? I can't find any information about the preposition 'to'. in Longman Dictionary. ldoceonline.com/dictionary/provide GRAMMAR: Patterns with provide • You provide something for someone: We provide information for parents. • You provide someone with something: We provide parents with information. ✗Don’t say: We provide parents information.

    – Suwon Kim
    Mar 29 at 10:09












  • @SuwonKim I agree with those entries. And they do not mean what I said is incorrect.

    – Lambie
    Mar 29 at 13:00











  • We provide information for parents. -The problem is that this sentence does not include any responsibility. I can't discriminate when to use 'to' and when to use 'for", because your explanation does not apply to the above sentence. I mean according to your explanation, 'We provide information to parents' should be correct, shouldn't it?

    – Suwon Kim
    Mar 30 at 14:50













1












1








1







One can provide [basically] any X to Y.




However, "provide food for their young" means specifically: care for
them by giving them food.




We even have an idiom based on that:




This provides food for thought.




  • Parents provide for their children.

To provide for=to sustain or support physically or financially or in some other way that does not just mean to give or supply.



whereas: provide x to y just means: supply or give x to y.



There is also the idea of make provision for [arrange for]:



  • The will provided for their upkeep.

The will had a provision that set out a sum of money to do towards upkeep,of, say, properties.



provide for=care for in some way
provide [x] to=give or supply with no idea of "caring for" or "taking care of" as in being physically or financially responsible for.



  • That man always provided for his family. [financially supported]

  • That man always provided funds to his community organization. [gave funds or made funds available to]





share|improve this answer













One can provide [basically] any X to Y.




However, "provide food for their young" means specifically: care for
them by giving them food.




We even have an idiom based on that:




This provides food for thought.




  • Parents provide for their children.

To provide for=to sustain or support physically or financially or in some other way that does not just mean to give or supply.



whereas: provide x to y just means: supply or give x to y.



There is also the idea of make provision for [arrange for]:



  • The will provided for their upkeep.

The will had a provision that set out a sum of money to do towards upkeep,of, say, properties.



provide for=care for in some way
provide [x] to=give or supply with no idea of "caring for" or "taking care of" as in being physically or financially responsible for.



  • That man always provided for his family. [financially supported]

  • That man always provided funds to his community organization. [gave funds or made funds available to]






share|improve this answer












share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer










answered Mar 28 at 14:32









LambieLambie

7,64611034




7,64611034












  • Thank you for your kind answer. However, what do you think of the following explanation from Longman Dictionary? I can't find any information about the preposition 'to'. in Longman Dictionary. ldoceonline.com/dictionary/provide GRAMMAR: Patterns with provide • You provide something for someone: We provide information for parents. • You provide someone with something: We provide parents with information. ✗Don’t say: We provide parents information.

    – Suwon Kim
    Mar 29 at 10:09












  • @SuwonKim I agree with those entries. And they do not mean what I said is incorrect.

    – Lambie
    Mar 29 at 13:00











  • We provide information for parents. -The problem is that this sentence does not include any responsibility. I can't discriminate when to use 'to' and when to use 'for", because your explanation does not apply to the above sentence. I mean according to your explanation, 'We provide information to parents' should be correct, shouldn't it?

    – Suwon Kim
    Mar 30 at 14:50

















  • Thank you for your kind answer. However, what do you think of the following explanation from Longman Dictionary? I can't find any information about the preposition 'to'. in Longman Dictionary. ldoceonline.com/dictionary/provide GRAMMAR: Patterns with provide • You provide something for someone: We provide information for parents. • You provide someone with something: We provide parents with information. ✗Don’t say: We provide parents information.

    – Suwon Kim
    Mar 29 at 10:09












  • @SuwonKim I agree with those entries. And they do not mean what I said is incorrect.

    – Lambie
    Mar 29 at 13:00











  • We provide information for parents. -The problem is that this sentence does not include any responsibility. I can't discriminate when to use 'to' and when to use 'for", because your explanation does not apply to the above sentence. I mean according to your explanation, 'We provide information to parents' should be correct, shouldn't it?

    – Suwon Kim
    Mar 30 at 14:50
















Thank you for your kind answer. However, what do you think of the following explanation from Longman Dictionary? I can't find any information about the preposition 'to'. in Longman Dictionary. ldoceonline.com/dictionary/provide GRAMMAR: Patterns with provide • You provide something for someone: We provide information for parents. • You provide someone with something: We provide parents with information. ✗Don’t say: We provide parents information.

– Suwon Kim
Mar 29 at 10:09






Thank you for your kind answer. However, what do you think of the following explanation from Longman Dictionary? I can't find any information about the preposition 'to'. in Longman Dictionary. ldoceonline.com/dictionary/provide GRAMMAR: Patterns with provide • You provide something for someone: We provide information for parents. • You provide someone with something: We provide parents with information. ✗Don’t say: We provide parents information.

– Suwon Kim
Mar 29 at 10:09














@SuwonKim I agree with those entries. And they do not mean what I said is incorrect.

– Lambie
Mar 29 at 13:00





@SuwonKim I agree with those entries. And they do not mean what I said is incorrect.

– Lambie
Mar 29 at 13:00













We provide information for parents. -The problem is that this sentence does not include any responsibility. I can't discriminate when to use 'to' and when to use 'for", because your explanation does not apply to the above sentence. I mean according to your explanation, 'We provide information to parents' should be correct, shouldn't it?

– Suwon Kim
Mar 30 at 14:50





We provide information for parents. -The problem is that this sentence does not include any responsibility. I can't discriminate when to use 'to' and when to use 'for", because your explanation does not apply to the above sentence. I mean according to your explanation, 'We provide information to parents' should be correct, shouldn't it?

– Suwon Kim
Mar 30 at 14:50













-1














Provide certainly has a meaning of "hand over" or "give to," so I can't see how it can be ungrammatical to use a "to" preposition in phrases using "provide."



You can also "provide an answer to a question." You certainly can "provide a shoulder to cry on." In either case, using "for" instead of "to" wouldn't make sense. You can say "provide a shoulder for her to cry on," however.



In other words, these are questions of coherent and natural-sounding phrasing, rather than strictly grammar, I believe.



"Provide for the common good" is an example of "provide" without an A and a B, by the way.



You can "provide for" something, or "provision" something, or "provide" something to someone.






share|improve this answer























  • Would you please check on the comments in the above if you don't mind?

    – Suwon Kim
    Mar 30 at 14:50











  • I agree with comment and answers that say you can "provide something to someone."

    – user8356
    Apr 1 at 12:45















-1














Provide certainly has a meaning of "hand over" or "give to," so I can't see how it can be ungrammatical to use a "to" preposition in phrases using "provide."



You can also "provide an answer to a question." You certainly can "provide a shoulder to cry on." In either case, using "for" instead of "to" wouldn't make sense. You can say "provide a shoulder for her to cry on," however.



In other words, these are questions of coherent and natural-sounding phrasing, rather than strictly grammar, I believe.



"Provide for the common good" is an example of "provide" without an A and a B, by the way.



You can "provide for" something, or "provision" something, or "provide" something to someone.






share|improve this answer























  • Would you please check on the comments in the above if you don't mind?

    – Suwon Kim
    Mar 30 at 14:50











  • I agree with comment and answers that say you can "provide something to someone."

    – user8356
    Apr 1 at 12:45













-1












-1








-1







Provide certainly has a meaning of "hand over" or "give to," so I can't see how it can be ungrammatical to use a "to" preposition in phrases using "provide."



You can also "provide an answer to a question." You certainly can "provide a shoulder to cry on." In either case, using "for" instead of "to" wouldn't make sense. You can say "provide a shoulder for her to cry on," however.



In other words, these are questions of coherent and natural-sounding phrasing, rather than strictly grammar, I believe.



"Provide for the common good" is an example of "provide" without an A and a B, by the way.



You can "provide for" something, or "provision" something, or "provide" something to someone.






share|improve this answer













Provide certainly has a meaning of "hand over" or "give to," so I can't see how it can be ungrammatical to use a "to" preposition in phrases using "provide."



You can also "provide an answer to a question." You certainly can "provide a shoulder to cry on." In either case, using "for" instead of "to" wouldn't make sense. You can say "provide a shoulder for her to cry on," however.



In other words, these are questions of coherent and natural-sounding phrasing, rather than strictly grammar, I believe.



"Provide for the common good" is an example of "provide" without an A and a B, by the way.



You can "provide for" something, or "provision" something, or "provide" something to someone.







share|improve this answer












share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer










answered Mar 28 at 14:13









user8356user8356

1,07558




1,07558












  • Would you please check on the comments in the above if you don't mind?

    – Suwon Kim
    Mar 30 at 14:50











  • I agree with comment and answers that say you can "provide something to someone."

    – user8356
    Apr 1 at 12:45

















  • Would you please check on the comments in the above if you don't mind?

    – Suwon Kim
    Mar 30 at 14:50











  • I agree with comment and answers that say you can "provide something to someone."

    – user8356
    Apr 1 at 12:45
















Would you please check on the comments in the above if you don't mind?

– Suwon Kim
Mar 30 at 14:50





Would you please check on the comments in the above if you don't mind?

– Suwon Kim
Mar 30 at 14:50













I agree with comment and answers that say you can "provide something to someone."

– user8356
Apr 1 at 12:45





I agree with comment and answers that say you can "provide something to someone."

– user8356
Apr 1 at 12:45

















draft saved

draft discarded
















































Thanks for contributing an answer to English Language & Usage Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid


  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fenglish.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f491694%2fprovide-x-to-someone-vs-provide-x-for-someone%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Færeyskur hestur Heimild | Tengill | Tilvísanir | LeiðsagnarvalRossið - síða um færeyska hrossið á færeyskuGott ár hjá færeyska hestinum

He _____ here since 1970 . Answer needed [closed]What does “since he was so high” mean?Meaning of “catch birds for”?How do I ensure “since” takes the meaning I want?“Who cares here” meaningWhat does “right round toward” mean?the time tense (had now been detected)What does the phrase “ring around the roses” mean here?Correct usage of “visited upon”Meaning of “foiled rail sabotage bid”It was the third time I had gone to Rome or It is the third time I had been to Rome

Slayer Innehåll Historia | Stil, komposition och lyrik | Bandets betydelse och framgångar | Sidoprojekt och samarbeten | Kontroverser | Medlemmar | Utmärkelser och nomineringar | Turnéer och festivaler | Diskografi | Referenser | Externa länkar | Navigeringsmenywww.slayer.net”Metal Massacre vol. 1””Metal Massacre vol. 3””Metal Massacre Volume III””Show No Mercy””Haunting the Chapel””Live Undead””Hell Awaits””Reign in Blood””Reign in Blood””Gold & Platinum – Reign in Blood””Golden Gods Awards Winners”originalet”Kerrang! Hall Of Fame””Slayer Looks Back On 37-Year Career In New Video Series: Part Two””South of Heaven””Gold & Platinum – South of Heaven””Seasons in the Abyss””Gold & Platinum - Seasons in the Abyss””Divine Intervention””Divine Intervention - Release group by Slayer””Gold & Platinum - Divine Intervention””Live Intrusion””Undisputed Attitude””Abolish Government/Superficial Love””Release “Slatanic Slaughter: A Tribute to Slayer” by Various Artists””Diabolus in Musica””Soundtrack to the Apocalypse””God Hates Us All””Systematic - Relationships””War at the Warfield””Gold & Platinum - War at the Warfield””Soundtrack to the Apocalypse””Gold & Platinum - Still Reigning””Metallica, Slayer, Iron Mauden Among Winners At Metal Hammer Awards””Eternal Pyre””Eternal Pyre - Slayer release group””Eternal Pyre””Metal Storm Awards 2006””Kerrang! Hall Of Fame””Slayer Wins 'Best Metal' Grammy Award””Slayer Guitarist Jeff Hanneman Dies””Bullet-For My Valentine booed at Metal Hammer Golden Gods Awards””Unholy Aliance””The End Of Slayer?””Slayer: We Could Thrash Out Two More Albums If We're Fast Enough...””'The Unholy Alliance: Chapter III' UK Dates Added”originalet”Megadeth And Slayer To Co-Headline 'Canadian Carnage' Trek”originalet”World Painted Blood””Release “World Painted Blood” by Slayer””Metallica Heading To Cinemas””Slayer, Megadeth To Join Forces For 'European Carnage' Tour - Dec. 18, 2010”originalet”Slayer's Hanneman Contracts Acute Infection; Band To Bring In Guest Guitarist””Cannibal Corpse's Pat O'Brien Will Step In As Slayer's Guest Guitarist”originalet”Slayer’s Jeff Hanneman Dead at 49””Dave Lombardo Says He Made Only $67,000 In 2011 While Touring With Slayer””Slayer: We Do Not Agree With Dave Lombardo's Substance Or Timeline Of Events””Slayer Welcomes Drummer Paul Bostaph Back To The Fold””Slayer Hope to Unveil Never-Before-Heard Jeff Hanneman Material on Next Album””Slayer Debut New Song 'Implode' During Surprise Golden Gods Appearance””Release group Repentless by Slayer””Repentless - Slayer - Credits””Slayer””Metal Storm Awards 2015””Slayer - to release comic book "Repentless #1"””Slayer To Release 'Repentless' 6.66" Vinyl Box Set””BREAKING NEWS: Slayer Announce Farewell Tour””Slayer Recruit Lamb of God, Anthrax, Behemoth + Testament for Final Tour””Slayer lägger ner efter 37 år””Slayer Announces Second North American Leg Of 'Final' Tour””Final World Tour””Slayer Announces Final European Tour With Lamb of God, Anthrax And Obituary””Slayer To Tour Europe With Lamb of God, Anthrax And Obituary””Slayer To Play 'Last French Show Ever' At Next Year's Hellfst””Slayer's Final World Tour Will Extend Into 2019””Death Angel's Rob Cavestany On Slayer's 'Farewell' Tour: 'Some Of Us Could See This Coming'””Testament Has No Plans To Retire Anytime Soon, Says Chuck Billy””Anthrax's Scott Ian On Slayer's 'Farewell' Tour Plans: 'I Was Surprised And I Wasn't Surprised'””Slayer””Slayer's Morbid Schlock””Review/Rock; For Slayer, the Mania Is the Message””Slayer - Biography””Slayer - Reign In Blood”originalet”Dave Lombardo””An exclusive oral history of Slayer”originalet”Exclusive! Interview With Slayer Guitarist Jeff Hanneman”originalet”Thinking Out Loud: Slayer's Kerry King on hair metal, Satan and being polite””Slayer Lyrics””Slayer - Biography””Most influential artists for extreme metal music””Slayer - Reign in Blood””Slayer guitarist Jeff Hanneman dies aged 49””Slatanic Slaughter: A Tribute to Slayer””Gateway to Hell: A Tribute to Slayer””Covered In Blood””Slayer: The Origins of Thrash in San Francisco, CA.””Why They Rule - #6 Slayer”originalet”Guitar World's 100 Greatest Heavy Metal Guitarists Of All Time”originalet”The fans have spoken: Slayer comes out on top in readers' polls”originalet”Tribute to Jeff Hanneman (1964-2013)””Lamb Of God Frontman: We Sound Like A Slayer Rip-Off””BEHEMOTH Frontman Pays Tribute To SLAYER's JEFF HANNEMAN””Slayer, Hatebreed Doing Double Duty On This Year's Ozzfest””System of a Down””Lacuna Coil’s Andrea Ferro Talks Influences, Skateboarding, Band Origins + More””Slayer - Reign in Blood””Into The Lungs of Hell””Slayer rules - en utställning om fans””Slayer and Their Fans Slashed Through a No-Holds-Barred Night at Gas Monkey””Home””Slayer””Gold & Platinum - The Big 4 Live from Sofia, Bulgaria””Exclusive! Interview With Slayer Guitarist Kerry King””2008-02-23: Wiltern, Los Angeles, CA, USA””Slayer's Kerry King To Perform With Megadeth Tonight! - Oct. 21, 2010”originalet”Dave Lombardo - Biography”Slayer Case DismissedArkiveradUltimate Classic Rock: Slayer guitarist Jeff Hanneman dead at 49.”Slayer: "We could never do any thing like Some Kind Of Monster..."””Cannibal Corpse'S Pat O'Brien Will Step In As Slayer'S Guest Guitarist | The Official Slayer Site”originalet”Slayer Wins 'Best Metal' Grammy Award””Slayer Guitarist Jeff Hanneman Dies””Kerrang! Awards 2006 Blog: Kerrang! Hall Of Fame””Kerrang! Awards 2013: Kerrang! Legend”originalet”Metallica, Slayer, Iron Maien Among Winners At Metal Hammer Awards””Metal Hammer Golden Gods Awards””Bullet For My Valentine Booed At Metal Hammer Golden Gods Awards””Metal Storm Awards 2006””Metal Storm Awards 2015””Slayer's Concert History””Slayer - Relationships””Slayer - Releases”Slayers officiella webbplatsSlayer på MusicBrainzOfficiell webbplatsSlayerSlayerr1373445760000 0001 1540 47353068615-5086262726cb13906545x(data)6033143kn20030215029