How do you spell Vitral - meaning saying bad inaccurate things I believe? [closed]
.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty{ margin-bottom:0;
}
-1
I'm trying to find the word, which I believe is something like "Vitral", like when someone is saying bad and/or inaccurate things, such as:
This guy has been spewing a bunch of inaccurate vitral
Am I thinking of the right term here? If so, how do you spell it - not having any luck finding it in Google.
single-word-requests expressions
edited Apr 25 at 10:10
Neeku
3,11652643
asked Apr 22 at 17:05
BrettBrett
13715
closed as off-topic by Cascabel, Mitch, JJJ, Chappo, AndyT Apr 25 at 14:24
This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:
- "Please include the research you’ve done, or consider if your question suits our English Language Learners site better. Questions that can be answered using commonly-available references are off-topic." – Cascabel, JJJ
If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.
|
show 1 more comment
-1
I'm trying to find the word, which I believe is something like "Vitral", like when someone is saying bad and/or inaccurate things, such as:
This guy has been spewing a bunch of inaccurate vitral
Am I thinking of the right term here? If so, how do you spell it - not having any luck finding it in Google.
single-word-requests expressions
edited Apr 25 at 10:10
Neeku
3,11652643
asked Apr 22 at 17:05
BrettBrett
13715
closed as off-topic by Cascabel, Mitch, JJJ, Chappo, AndyT Apr 25 at 14:24
This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:
- "Please include the research you’ve done, or consider if your question suits our English Language Learners site better. Questions that can be answered using commonly-available references are off-topic." – Cascabel, JJJ
If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.
3
Try vitriol [SE requires more characters]
– Minty
Apr 22 at 17:09
@Minty I believe that is it, thanks :)
– Brett
Apr 22 at 17:12
3
As helpful this was to the asker, I'm voting to close this question as off-topic because it doesn't help anyone else at all.
– Mitch
Apr 22 at 17:23
@Brett, I don't think we have a lot of "haters" on our site, but one thing we do object to is personal attack. Our Code of Conduct is quite explicit: no subtle put-downs or unfriendly language. Mitch gave one reason for closure, but another was equally valid: questions that can be answered using commonly-available references are off-topic. You say you couldn't find it, but when I googled "define vitral", it showed vitriol on the first page.
– Chappo
Apr 24 at 5:46
@Chappo Firstly, you don't have to go looking far to find the "haters" as you put it, it's very well known fact there are a large group of people that no longer use and/or despise SE for attitudes such as what Mitch displayed (along with a wide array of other various reasons) and I believe this was partially some of the reasons that brought the recent changes of SE; secondly, now you're basically calling me a liar about not being able to find it - good job!
– Brett
Apr 25 at 12:41
|
show 1 more comment
-1
-1
-1
I'm trying to find the word, which I believe is something like "Vitral", like when someone is saying bad and/or inaccurate things, such as:
This guy has been spewing a bunch of inaccurate vitral
Am I thinking of the right term here? If so, how do you spell it - not having any luck finding it in Google.
single-word-requests expressions
edited Apr 25 at 10:10
Neeku
3,11652643
asked Apr 22 at 17:05
BrettBrett
13715
I'm trying to find the word, which I believe is something like "Vitral", like when someone is saying bad and/or inaccurate things, such as:
This guy has been spewing a bunch of inaccurate vitral
Am I thinking of the right term here? If so, how do you spell it - not having any luck finding it in Google.
single-word-requests expressions
single-word-requests expressions
edited Apr 25 at 10:10
Neeku
3,11652643
asked Apr 22 at 17:05
BrettBrett
13715
edited Apr 25 at 10:10
Neeku
3,11652643
asked Apr 22 at 17:05
BrettBrett
13715
edited Apr 25 at 10:10
Neeku
3,11652643
edited Apr 25 at 10:10
Neeku
3,11652643
edited Apr 25 at 10:10
Neeku
3,11652643
3,11652643
asked Apr 22 at 17:05
BrettBrett
13715
asked Apr 22 at 17:05
BrettBrett
13715
asked Apr 22 at 17:05
BrettBrett
13715
13715
closed as off-topic by Cascabel, Mitch, JJJ, Chappo, AndyT Apr 25 at 14:24
This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:
- "Please include the research you’ve done, or consider if your question suits our English Language Learners site better. Questions that can be answered using commonly-available references are off-topic." – Cascabel, JJJ
If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.
closed as off-topic by Cascabel, Mitch, JJJ, Chappo, AndyT Apr 25 at 14:24
This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:
- "Please include the research you’ve done, or consider if your question suits our English Language Learners site better. Questions that can be answered using commonly-available references are off-topic." – Cascabel, JJJ
If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.
3
Try vitriol [SE requires more characters]
– Minty
Apr 22 at 17:09
@Minty I believe that is it, thanks :)
– Brett
Apr 22 at 17:12
3
As helpful this was to the asker, I'm voting to close this question as off-topic because it doesn't help anyone else at all.
– Mitch
Apr 22 at 17:23
@Brett, I don't think we have a lot of "haters" on our site, but one thing we do object to is personal attack. Our Code of Conduct is quite explicit: no subtle put-downs or unfriendly language. Mitch gave one reason for closure, but another was equally valid: questions that can be answered using commonly-available references are off-topic. You say you couldn't find it, but when I googled "define vitral", it showed vitriol on the first page.
– Chappo
Apr 24 at 5:46
@Chappo Firstly, you don't have to go looking far to find the "haters" as you put it, it's very well known fact there are a large group of people that no longer use and/or despise SE for attitudes such as what Mitch displayed (along with a wide array of other various reasons) and I believe this was partially some of the reasons that brought the recent changes of SE; secondly, now you're basically calling me a liar about not being able to find it - good job!
– Brett
Apr 25 at 12:41
|
show 1 more comment
3
Try vitriol [SE requires more characters]
– Minty
Apr 22 at 17:09
@Minty I believe that is it, thanks :)
– Brett
Apr 22 at 17:12
3
As helpful this was to the asker, I'm voting to close this question as off-topic because it doesn't help anyone else at all.
– Mitch
Apr 22 at 17:23
@Brett, I don't think we have a lot of "haters" on our site, but one thing we do object to is personal attack. Our Code of Conduct is quite explicit: no subtle put-downs or unfriendly language. Mitch gave one reason for closure, but another was equally valid: questions that can be answered using commonly-available references are off-topic. You say you couldn't find it, but when I googled "define vitral", it showed vitriol on the first page.
– Chappo
Apr 24 at 5:46
@Chappo Firstly, you don't have to go looking far to find the "haters" as you put it, it's very well known fact there are a large group of people that no longer use and/or despise SE for attitudes such as what Mitch displayed (along with a wide array of other various reasons) and I believe this was partially some of the reasons that brought the recent changes of SE; secondly, now you're basically calling me a liar about not being able to find it - good job!
– Brett
Apr 25 at 12:41
3
3
Try vitriol [SE requires more characters]
– Minty
Apr 22 at 17:09
Try vitriol [SE requires more characters]
– Minty
Apr 22 at 17:09
@Minty I believe that is it, thanks :)
– Brett
Apr 22 at 17:12
@Minty I believe that is it, thanks :)
– Brett
Apr 22 at 17:12
3
3
As helpful this was to the asker, I'm voting to close this question as off-topic because it doesn't help anyone else at all.
– Mitch
Apr 22 at 17:23
As helpful this was to the asker, I'm voting to close this question as off-topic because it doesn't help anyone else at all.
– Mitch
Apr 22 at 17:23
@Brett, I don't think we have a lot of "haters" on our site, but one thing we do object to is personal attack. Our Code of Conduct is quite explicit: no subtle put-downs or unfriendly language. Mitch gave one reason for closure, but another was equally valid: questions that can be answered using commonly-available references are off-topic. You say you couldn't find it, but when I googled "define vitral", it showed vitriol on the first page.
– Chappo
Apr 24 at 5:46
@Brett, I don't think we have a lot of "haters" on our site, but one thing we do object to is personal attack. Our Code of Conduct is quite explicit: no subtle put-downs or unfriendly language. Mitch gave one reason for closure, but another was equally valid: questions that can be answered using commonly-available references are off-topic. You say you couldn't find it, but when I googled "define vitral", it showed vitriol on the first page.
– Chappo
Apr 24 at 5:46
@Chappo Firstly, you don't have to go looking far to find the "haters" as you put it, it's very well known fact there are a large group of people that no longer use and/or despise SE for attitudes such as what Mitch displayed (along with a wide array of other various reasons) and I believe this was partially some of the reasons that brought the recent changes of SE; secondly, now you're basically calling me a liar about not being able to find it - good job!
– Brett
Apr 25 at 12:41
@Chappo Firstly, you don't have to go looking far to find the "haters" as you put it, it's very well known fact there are a large group of people that no longer use and/or despise SE for attitudes such as what Mitch displayed (along with a wide array of other various reasons) and I believe this was partially some of the reasons that brought the recent changes of SE; secondly, now you're basically calling me a liar about not being able to find it - good job!
– Brett
Apr 25 at 12:41
|
show 1 more comment
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
5
The correct spelling would be vitriol.
https://www.dictionary.com/browse/vitriol
answered Apr 22 at 17:20
Tricia RobertsTricia Roberts
693
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
5
The correct spelling would be vitriol.
https://www.dictionary.com/browse/vitriol
answered Apr 22 at 17:20
Tricia RobertsTricia Roberts
693
add a comment |
5
The correct spelling would be vitriol.
https://www.dictionary.com/browse/vitriol
answered Apr 22 at 17:20
Tricia RobertsTricia Roberts
693
add a comment |
5
5
5
The correct spelling would be vitriol.
https://www.dictionary.com/browse/vitriol
answered Apr 22 at 17:20
Tricia RobertsTricia Roberts
693
The correct spelling would be vitriol.
https://www.dictionary.com/browse/vitriol
answered Apr 22 at 17:20
Tricia RobertsTricia Roberts
693
answered Apr 22 at 17:20
Tricia RobertsTricia Roberts
693
answered Apr 22 at 17:20
Tricia RobertsTricia Roberts
693
answered Apr 22 at 17:20
Tricia RobertsTricia Roberts
693
693
add a comment |
add a comment |
3
Try vitriol [SE requires more characters]
– Minty
Apr 22 at 17:09
@Minty I believe that is it, thanks :)
– Brett
Apr 22 at 17:12
3
As helpful this was to the asker, I'm voting to close this question as off-topic because it doesn't help anyone else at all.
– Mitch
Apr 22 at 17:23
@Brett, I don't think we have a lot of "haters" on our site, but one thing we do object to is personal attack. Our Code of Conduct is quite explicit: no subtle put-downs or unfriendly language. Mitch gave one reason for closure, but another was equally valid: questions that can be answered using commonly-available references are off-topic. You say you couldn't find it, but when I googled "define vitral", it showed vitriol on the first page.
– Chappo
Apr 24 at 5:46
@Chappo Firstly, you don't have to go looking far to find the "haters" as you put it, it's very well known fact there are a large group of people that no longer use and/or despise SE for attitudes such as what Mitch displayed (along with a wide array of other various reasons) and I believe this was partially some of the reasons that brought the recent changes of SE; secondly, now you're basically calling me a liar about not being able to find it - good job!
– Brett
Apr 25 at 12:41