How do you spell Vitral - meaning saying bad inaccurate things I believe? [closed]





.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty{ margin-bottom:0;
}







-1















I'm trying to find the word, which I believe is something like "Vitral", like when someone is saying bad and/or inaccurate things, such as:




This guy has been spewing a bunch of inaccurate vitral




Am I thinking of the right term here? If so, how do you spell it - not having any luck finding it in Google.










share|improve this question















closed as off-topic by Cascabel, Mitch, JJJ, Chappo, AndyT Apr 25 at 14:24


This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:


  • "Please include the research you’ve done, or consider if your question suits our English Language Learners site better. Questions that can be answered using commonly-available references are off-topic." – Cascabel, JJJ

If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.












  • 3





    Try vitriol [SE requires more characters]

    – Minty
    Apr 22 at 17:09











  • @Minty I believe that is it, thanks :)

    – Brett
    Apr 22 at 17:12






  • 3





    As helpful this was to the asker, I'm voting to close this question as off-topic because it doesn't help anyone else at all.

    – Mitch
    Apr 22 at 17:23











  • @Brett, I don't think we have a lot of "haters" on our site, but one thing we do object to is personal attack. Our Code of Conduct is quite explicit: no subtle put-downs or unfriendly language. Mitch gave one reason for closure, but another was equally valid: questions that can be answered using commonly-available references are off-topic. You say you couldn't find it, but when I googled "define vitral", it showed vitriol on the first page.

    – Chappo
    Apr 24 at 5:46











  • @Chappo Firstly, you don't have to go looking far to find the "haters" as you put it, it's very well known fact there are a large group of people that no longer use and/or despise SE for attitudes such as what Mitch displayed (along with a wide array of other various reasons) and I believe this was partially some of the reasons that brought the recent changes of SE; secondly, now you're basically calling me a liar about not being able to find it - good job!

    – Brett
    Apr 25 at 12:41


















-1















I'm trying to find the word, which I believe is something like "Vitral", like when someone is saying bad and/or inaccurate things, such as:




This guy has been spewing a bunch of inaccurate vitral




Am I thinking of the right term here? If so, how do you spell it - not having any luck finding it in Google.










share|improve this question















closed as off-topic by Cascabel, Mitch, JJJ, Chappo, AndyT Apr 25 at 14:24


This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:


  • "Please include the research you’ve done, or consider if your question suits our English Language Learners site better. Questions that can be answered using commonly-available references are off-topic." – Cascabel, JJJ

If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.












  • 3





    Try vitriol [SE requires more characters]

    – Minty
    Apr 22 at 17:09











  • @Minty I believe that is it, thanks :)

    – Brett
    Apr 22 at 17:12






  • 3





    As helpful this was to the asker, I'm voting to close this question as off-topic because it doesn't help anyone else at all.

    – Mitch
    Apr 22 at 17:23











  • @Brett, I don't think we have a lot of "haters" on our site, but one thing we do object to is personal attack. Our Code of Conduct is quite explicit: no subtle put-downs or unfriendly language. Mitch gave one reason for closure, but another was equally valid: questions that can be answered using commonly-available references are off-topic. You say you couldn't find it, but when I googled "define vitral", it showed vitriol on the first page.

    – Chappo
    Apr 24 at 5:46











  • @Chappo Firstly, you don't have to go looking far to find the "haters" as you put it, it's very well known fact there are a large group of people that no longer use and/or despise SE for attitudes such as what Mitch displayed (along with a wide array of other various reasons) and I believe this was partially some of the reasons that brought the recent changes of SE; secondly, now you're basically calling me a liar about not being able to find it - good job!

    – Brett
    Apr 25 at 12:41














-1












-1








-1








I'm trying to find the word, which I believe is something like "Vitral", like when someone is saying bad and/or inaccurate things, such as:




This guy has been spewing a bunch of inaccurate vitral




Am I thinking of the right term here? If so, how do you spell it - not having any luck finding it in Google.










share|improve this question
















I'm trying to find the word, which I believe is something like "Vitral", like when someone is saying bad and/or inaccurate things, such as:




This guy has been spewing a bunch of inaccurate vitral




Am I thinking of the right term here? If so, how do you spell it - not having any luck finding it in Google.







single-word-requests expressions






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited Apr 25 at 10:10









Neeku

3,11652643




3,11652643










asked Apr 22 at 17:05









BrettBrett

13715




13715




closed as off-topic by Cascabel, Mitch, JJJ, Chappo, AndyT Apr 25 at 14:24


This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:


  • "Please include the research you’ve done, or consider if your question suits our English Language Learners site better. Questions that can be answered using commonly-available references are off-topic." – Cascabel, JJJ

If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.







closed as off-topic by Cascabel, Mitch, JJJ, Chappo, AndyT Apr 25 at 14:24


This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:


  • "Please include the research you’ve done, or consider if your question suits our English Language Learners site better. Questions that can be answered using commonly-available references are off-topic." – Cascabel, JJJ

If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.








  • 3





    Try vitriol [SE requires more characters]

    – Minty
    Apr 22 at 17:09











  • @Minty I believe that is it, thanks :)

    – Brett
    Apr 22 at 17:12






  • 3





    As helpful this was to the asker, I'm voting to close this question as off-topic because it doesn't help anyone else at all.

    – Mitch
    Apr 22 at 17:23











  • @Brett, I don't think we have a lot of "haters" on our site, but one thing we do object to is personal attack. Our Code of Conduct is quite explicit: no subtle put-downs or unfriendly language. Mitch gave one reason for closure, but another was equally valid: questions that can be answered using commonly-available references are off-topic. You say you couldn't find it, but when I googled "define vitral", it showed vitriol on the first page.

    – Chappo
    Apr 24 at 5:46











  • @Chappo Firstly, you don't have to go looking far to find the "haters" as you put it, it's very well known fact there are a large group of people that no longer use and/or despise SE for attitudes such as what Mitch displayed (along with a wide array of other various reasons) and I believe this was partially some of the reasons that brought the recent changes of SE; secondly, now you're basically calling me a liar about not being able to find it - good job!

    – Brett
    Apr 25 at 12:41














  • 3





    Try vitriol [SE requires more characters]

    – Minty
    Apr 22 at 17:09











  • @Minty I believe that is it, thanks :)

    – Brett
    Apr 22 at 17:12






  • 3





    As helpful this was to the asker, I'm voting to close this question as off-topic because it doesn't help anyone else at all.

    – Mitch
    Apr 22 at 17:23











  • @Brett, I don't think we have a lot of "haters" on our site, but one thing we do object to is personal attack. Our Code of Conduct is quite explicit: no subtle put-downs or unfriendly language. Mitch gave one reason for closure, but another was equally valid: questions that can be answered using commonly-available references are off-topic. You say you couldn't find it, but when I googled "define vitral", it showed vitriol on the first page.

    – Chappo
    Apr 24 at 5:46











  • @Chappo Firstly, you don't have to go looking far to find the "haters" as you put it, it's very well known fact there are a large group of people that no longer use and/or despise SE for attitudes such as what Mitch displayed (along with a wide array of other various reasons) and I believe this was partially some of the reasons that brought the recent changes of SE; secondly, now you're basically calling me a liar about not being able to find it - good job!

    – Brett
    Apr 25 at 12:41








3




3





Try vitriol [SE requires more characters]

– Minty
Apr 22 at 17:09





Try vitriol [SE requires more characters]

– Minty
Apr 22 at 17:09













@Minty I believe that is it, thanks :)

– Brett
Apr 22 at 17:12





@Minty I believe that is it, thanks :)

– Brett
Apr 22 at 17:12




3




3





As helpful this was to the asker, I'm voting to close this question as off-topic because it doesn't help anyone else at all.

– Mitch
Apr 22 at 17:23





As helpful this was to the asker, I'm voting to close this question as off-topic because it doesn't help anyone else at all.

– Mitch
Apr 22 at 17:23













@Brett, I don't think we have a lot of "haters" on our site, but one thing we do object to is personal attack. Our Code of Conduct is quite explicit: no subtle put-downs or unfriendly language. Mitch gave one reason for closure, but another was equally valid: questions that can be answered using commonly-available references are off-topic. You say you couldn't find it, but when I googled "define vitral", it showed vitriol on the first page.

– Chappo
Apr 24 at 5:46





@Brett, I don't think we have a lot of "haters" on our site, but one thing we do object to is personal attack. Our Code of Conduct is quite explicit: no subtle put-downs or unfriendly language. Mitch gave one reason for closure, but another was equally valid: questions that can be answered using commonly-available references are off-topic. You say you couldn't find it, but when I googled "define vitral", it showed vitriol on the first page.

– Chappo
Apr 24 at 5:46













@Chappo Firstly, you don't have to go looking far to find the "haters" as you put it, it's very well known fact there are a large group of people that no longer use and/or despise SE for attitudes such as what Mitch displayed (along with a wide array of other various reasons) and I believe this was partially some of the reasons that brought the recent changes of SE; secondly, now you're basically calling me a liar about not being able to find it - good job!

– Brett
Apr 25 at 12:41





@Chappo Firstly, you don't have to go looking far to find the "haters" as you put it, it's very well known fact there are a large group of people that no longer use and/or despise SE for attitudes such as what Mitch displayed (along with a wide array of other various reasons) and I believe this was partially some of the reasons that brought the recent changes of SE; secondly, now you're basically calling me a liar about not being able to find it - good job!

– Brett
Apr 25 at 12:41










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















5














The correct spelling would be vitriol.
https://www.dictionary.com/browse/vitriol






share|improve this answer






























    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes








    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    5














    The correct spelling would be vitriol.
    https://www.dictionary.com/browse/vitriol






    share|improve this answer




























      5














      The correct spelling would be vitriol.
      https://www.dictionary.com/browse/vitriol






      share|improve this answer


























        5












        5








        5







        The correct spelling would be vitriol.
        https://www.dictionary.com/browse/vitriol






        share|improve this answer













        The correct spelling would be vitriol.
        https://www.dictionary.com/browse/vitriol







        share|improve this answer












        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer










        answered Apr 22 at 17:20









        Tricia RobertsTricia Roberts

        693




        693















            Popular posts from this blog

            Færeyskur hestur Heimild | Tengill | Tilvísanir | LeiðsagnarvalRossið - síða um færeyska hrossið á færeyskuGott ár hjá færeyska hestinum

            He _____ here since 1970 . Answer needed [closed]What does “since he was so high” mean?Meaning of “catch birds for”?How do I ensure “since” takes the meaning I want?“Who cares here” meaningWhat does “right round toward” mean?the time tense (had now been detected)What does the phrase “ring around the roses” mean here?Correct usage of “visited upon”Meaning of “foiled rail sabotage bid”It was the third time I had gone to Rome or It is the third time I had been to Rome

            Slayer Innehåll Historia | Stil, komposition och lyrik | Bandets betydelse och framgångar | Sidoprojekt och samarbeten | Kontroverser | Medlemmar | Utmärkelser och nomineringar | Turnéer och festivaler | Diskografi | Referenser | Externa länkar | Navigeringsmenywww.slayer.net”Metal Massacre vol. 1””Metal Massacre vol. 3””Metal Massacre Volume III””Show No Mercy””Haunting the Chapel””Live Undead””Hell Awaits””Reign in Blood””Reign in Blood””Gold & Platinum – Reign in Blood””Golden Gods Awards Winners”originalet”Kerrang! Hall Of Fame””Slayer Looks Back On 37-Year Career In New Video Series: Part Two””South of Heaven””Gold & Platinum – South of Heaven””Seasons in the Abyss””Gold & Platinum - Seasons in the Abyss””Divine Intervention””Divine Intervention - Release group by Slayer””Gold & Platinum - Divine Intervention””Live Intrusion””Undisputed Attitude””Abolish Government/Superficial Love””Release “Slatanic Slaughter: A Tribute to Slayer” by Various Artists””Diabolus in Musica””Soundtrack to the Apocalypse””God Hates Us All””Systematic - Relationships””War at the Warfield””Gold & Platinum - War at the Warfield””Soundtrack to the Apocalypse””Gold & Platinum - Still Reigning””Metallica, Slayer, Iron Mauden Among Winners At Metal Hammer Awards””Eternal Pyre””Eternal Pyre - Slayer release group””Eternal Pyre””Metal Storm Awards 2006””Kerrang! Hall Of Fame””Slayer Wins 'Best Metal' Grammy Award””Slayer Guitarist Jeff Hanneman Dies””Bullet-For My Valentine booed at Metal Hammer Golden Gods Awards””Unholy Aliance””The End Of Slayer?””Slayer: We Could Thrash Out Two More Albums If We're Fast Enough...””'The Unholy Alliance: Chapter III' UK Dates Added”originalet”Megadeth And Slayer To Co-Headline 'Canadian Carnage' Trek”originalet”World Painted Blood””Release “World Painted Blood” by Slayer””Metallica Heading To Cinemas””Slayer, Megadeth To Join Forces For 'European Carnage' Tour - Dec. 18, 2010”originalet”Slayer's Hanneman Contracts Acute Infection; Band To Bring In Guest Guitarist””Cannibal Corpse's Pat O'Brien Will Step In As Slayer's Guest Guitarist”originalet”Slayer’s Jeff Hanneman Dead at 49””Dave Lombardo Says He Made Only $67,000 In 2011 While Touring With Slayer””Slayer: We Do Not Agree With Dave Lombardo's Substance Or Timeline Of Events””Slayer Welcomes Drummer Paul Bostaph Back To The Fold””Slayer Hope to Unveil Never-Before-Heard Jeff Hanneman Material on Next Album””Slayer Debut New Song 'Implode' During Surprise Golden Gods Appearance””Release group Repentless by Slayer””Repentless - Slayer - Credits””Slayer””Metal Storm Awards 2015””Slayer - to release comic book "Repentless #1"””Slayer To Release 'Repentless' 6.66" Vinyl Box Set””BREAKING NEWS: Slayer Announce Farewell Tour””Slayer Recruit Lamb of God, Anthrax, Behemoth + Testament for Final Tour””Slayer lägger ner efter 37 år””Slayer Announces Second North American Leg Of 'Final' Tour””Final World Tour””Slayer Announces Final European Tour With Lamb of God, Anthrax And Obituary””Slayer To Tour Europe With Lamb of God, Anthrax And Obituary””Slayer To Play 'Last French Show Ever' At Next Year's Hellfst””Slayer's Final World Tour Will Extend Into 2019””Death Angel's Rob Cavestany On Slayer's 'Farewell' Tour: 'Some Of Us Could See This Coming'””Testament Has No Plans To Retire Anytime Soon, Says Chuck Billy””Anthrax's Scott Ian On Slayer's 'Farewell' Tour Plans: 'I Was Surprised And I Wasn't Surprised'””Slayer””Slayer's Morbid Schlock””Review/Rock; For Slayer, the Mania Is the Message””Slayer - Biography””Slayer - Reign In Blood”originalet”Dave Lombardo””An exclusive oral history of Slayer”originalet”Exclusive! Interview With Slayer Guitarist Jeff Hanneman”originalet”Thinking Out Loud: Slayer's Kerry King on hair metal, Satan and being polite””Slayer Lyrics””Slayer - Biography””Most influential artists for extreme metal music””Slayer - Reign in Blood””Slayer guitarist Jeff Hanneman dies aged 49””Slatanic Slaughter: A Tribute to Slayer””Gateway to Hell: A Tribute to Slayer””Covered In Blood””Slayer: The Origins of Thrash in San Francisco, CA.””Why They Rule - #6 Slayer”originalet”Guitar World's 100 Greatest Heavy Metal Guitarists Of All Time”originalet”The fans have spoken: Slayer comes out on top in readers' polls”originalet”Tribute to Jeff Hanneman (1964-2013)””Lamb Of God Frontman: We Sound Like A Slayer Rip-Off””BEHEMOTH Frontman Pays Tribute To SLAYER's JEFF HANNEMAN””Slayer, Hatebreed Doing Double Duty On This Year's Ozzfest””System of a Down””Lacuna Coil’s Andrea Ferro Talks Influences, Skateboarding, Band Origins + More””Slayer - Reign in Blood””Into The Lungs of Hell””Slayer rules - en utställning om fans””Slayer and Their Fans Slashed Through a No-Holds-Barred Night at Gas Monkey””Home””Slayer””Gold & Platinum - The Big 4 Live from Sofia, Bulgaria””Exclusive! Interview With Slayer Guitarist Kerry King””2008-02-23: Wiltern, Los Angeles, CA, USA””Slayer's Kerry King To Perform With Megadeth Tonight! - Oct. 21, 2010”originalet”Dave Lombardo - Biography”Slayer Case DismissedArkiveradUltimate Classic Rock: Slayer guitarist Jeff Hanneman dead at 49.”Slayer: "We could never do any thing like Some Kind Of Monster..."””Cannibal Corpse'S Pat O'Brien Will Step In As Slayer'S Guest Guitarist | The Official Slayer Site”originalet”Slayer Wins 'Best Metal' Grammy Award””Slayer Guitarist Jeff Hanneman Dies””Kerrang! Awards 2006 Blog: Kerrang! Hall Of Fame””Kerrang! Awards 2013: Kerrang! Legend”originalet”Metallica, Slayer, Iron Maien Among Winners At Metal Hammer Awards””Metal Hammer Golden Gods Awards””Bullet For My Valentine Booed At Metal Hammer Golden Gods Awards””Metal Storm Awards 2006””Metal Storm Awards 2015””Slayer's Concert History””Slayer - Relationships””Slayer - Releases”Slayers officiella webbplatsSlayer på MusicBrainzOfficiell webbplatsSlayerSlayerr1373445760000 0001 1540 47353068615-5086262726cb13906545x(data)6033143kn20030215029