you owe me and you owe my [closed]





.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty{ margin-bottom:0;
}







0















I read all the answers about "owe" but I am still confused. My question is not about the meaning of sentences, it's clear but which grammar rule is used in these sentences:




  • I owe you some money (and not I owe your money)

  • You owe me some money (and not you owe my money)


are sentences on the left correct grammatically?






grammar writing-style







share|improve this question















closed as off-topic by Hot Licks, Cascabel, Mari-Lou A, Chappo, JJJ Apr 23 at 21:47


This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:


  • "Please include the research you’ve done, or consider if your question suits our English Language Learners site better. Questions that can be answered using commonly-available references are off-topic." – Cascabel, Mari-Lou A, Chappo, JJJ

If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.

















  • The sentences on the left are grammatical.

    – Weather Vane
    Apr 22 at 16:54











  • The only difference between the two sentences is who owes whom.

    – Jason Bassford
    Apr 22 at 17:13











  • You cannot owe what belongs to another party. Your debt is exclusively your own. And until you pay them back, they do not possess the thing owed, so it cannot be called theirs. The barrier of possession firmly separates debtors and creditors.

    – Nigel J
    Apr 23 at 10:47




















0















I read all the answers about "owe" but I am still confused. My question is not about the meaning of sentences, it's clear but which grammar rule is used in these sentences:




  • I owe you some money (and not I owe your money)

  • You owe me some money (and not you owe my money)


are sentences on the left correct grammatically?






grammar writing-style







share|improve this question















closed as off-topic by Hot Licks, Cascabel, Mari-Lou A, Chappo, JJJ Apr 23 at 21:47


This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:


  • "Please include the research you’ve done, or consider if your question suits our English Language Learners site better. Questions that can be answered using commonly-available references are off-topic." – Cascabel, Mari-Lou A, Chappo, JJJ

If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.

















  • The sentences on the left are grammatical.

    – Weather Vane
    Apr 22 at 16:54











  • The only difference between the two sentences is who owes whom.

    – Jason Bassford
    Apr 22 at 17:13











  • You cannot owe what belongs to another party. Your debt is exclusively your own. And until you pay them back, they do not possess the thing owed, so it cannot be called theirs. The barrier of possession firmly separates debtors and creditors.

    – Nigel J
    Apr 23 at 10:47
















0












0








0








I read all the answers about "owe" but I am still confused. My question is not about the meaning of sentences, it's clear but which grammar rule is used in these sentences:




  • I owe you some money (and not I owe your money)

  • You owe me some money (and not you owe my money)


are sentences on the left correct grammatically?






grammar writing-style







share|improve this question
















I read all the answers about "owe" but I am still confused. My question is not about the meaning of sentences, it's clear but which grammar rule is used in these sentences:




  • I owe you some money (and not I owe your money)

  • You owe me some money (and not you owe my money)


are sentences on the left correct grammatically?






grammar writing-style




grammar writing-style






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited Apr 24 at 8:17







El Lee

















asked Apr 22 at 16:48









El LeeEl Lee

33




33




closed as off-topic by Hot Licks, Cascabel, Mari-Lou A, Chappo, JJJ Apr 23 at 21:47


This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:


  • "Please include the research you’ve done, or consider if your question suits our English Language Learners site better. Questions that can be answered using commonly-available references are off-topic." – Cascabel, Mari-Lou A, Chappo, JJJ

If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.







closed as off-topic by Hot Licks, Cascabel, Mari-Lou A, Chappo, JJJ Apr 23 at 21:47


This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:


  • "Please include the research you’ve done, or consider if your question suits our English Language Learners site better. Questions that can be answered using commonly-available references are off-topic." – Cascabel, Mari-Lou A, Chappo, JJJ

If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.













  • The sentences on the left are grammatical.

    – Weather Vane
    Apr 22 at 16:54











  • The only difference between the two sentences is who owes whom.

    – Jason Bassford
    Apr 22 at 17:13











  • You cannot owe what belongs to another party. Your debt is exclusively your own. And until you pay them back, they do not possess the thing owed, so it cannot be called theirs. The barrier of possession firmly separates debtors and creditors.

    – Nigel J
    Apr 23 at 10:47





















  • The sentences on the left are grammatical.

    – Weather Vane
    Apr 22 at 16:54











  • The only difference between the two sentences is who owes whom.

    – Jason Bassford
    Apr 22 at 17:13











  • You cannot owe what belongs to another party. Your debt is exclusively your own. And until you pay them back, they do not possess the thing owed, so it cannot be called theirs. The barrier of possession firmly separates debtors and creditors.

    – Nigel J
    Apr 23 at 10:47



















The sentences on the left are grammatical.

– Weather Vane
Apr 22 at 16:54





The sentences on the left are grammatical.

– Weather Vane
Apr 22 at 16:54













The only difference between the two sentences is who owes whom.

– Jason Bassford
Apr 22 at 17:13





The only difference between the two sentences is who owes whom.

– Jason Bassford
Apr 22 at 17:13













You cannot owe what belongs to another party. Your debt is exclusively your own. And until you pay them back, they do not possess the thing owed, so it cannot be called theirs. The barrier of possession firmly separates debtors and creditors.

– Nigel J
Apr 23 at 10:47







You cannot owe what belongs to another party. Your debt is exclusively your own. And until you pay them back, they do not possess the thing owed, so it cannot be called theirs. The barrier of possession firmly separates debtors and creditors.

– Nigel J
Apr 23 at 10:47












1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















1














"owe" is usually a ditransitive verb: somebody owes somebody something.



We can say things like:




  • I owe a lot of money. (Here ,"owe" is monotransitive. In this case, the creditors are not specified.)


When the creditor is specified, then the ditransitive pattern is required:




  • I owe you / the bank a lot of money.






share|improve this answer






























    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes








    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    1














    "owe" is usually a ditransitive verb: somebody owes somebody something.



    We can say things like:




    • I owe a lot of money. (Here ,"owe" is monotransitive. In this case, the creditors are not specified.)


    When the creditor is specified, then the ditransitive pattern is required:




    • I owe you / the bank a lot of money.






    share|improve this answer




























      1














      "owe" is usually a ditransitive verb: somebody owes somebody something.



      We can say things like:




      • I owe a lot of money. (Here ,"owe" is monotransitive. In this case, the creditors are not specified.)


      When the creditor is specified, then the ditransitive pattern is required:




      • I owe you / the bank a lot of money.






      share|improve this answer


























        1












        1








        1







        "owe" is usually a ditransitive verb: somebody owes somebody something.



        We can say things like:




        • I owe a lot of money. (Here ,"owe" is monotransitive. In this case, the creditors are not specified.)


        When the creditor is specified, then the ditransitive pattern is required:




        • I owe you / the bank a lot of money.






        share|improve this answer













        "owe" is usually a ditransitive verb: somebody owes somebody something.



        We can say things like:




        • I owe a lot of money. (Here ,"owe" is monotransitive. In this case, the creditors are not specified.)


        When the creditor is specified, then the ditransitive pattern is required:




        • I owe you / the bank a lot of money.







        share|improve this answer












        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer










        answered Apr 22 at 17:30









        GustavsonGustavson

        2,3811613




        2,3811613















            -

            Popular posts from this blog

            He _____ here since 1970 . Answer needed [closed]What does “since he was so high” mean?Meaning of “catch birds for”?How do I ensure “since” takes the meaning I want?“Who cares here” meaningWhat does “right round toward” mean?the time tense (had now been detected)What does the phrase “ring around the roses” mean here?Correct usage of “visited upon”Meaning of “foiled rail sabotage bid”It was the third time I had gone to Rome or It is the third time I had been to Rome

            Image
            Engineer refusing to file/disclose patents Extending the spectral theorem for bounded self adjoint operators to bounded normal operators Do varchar(max), nvarchar(max) and varbinary(max) columns affect select queries? Why is it that I can sometimes guess the next note? What linear sensor for a keyboard? Why don’t women say שלא עשני גויה and שפחה, according to Ashkenazim? Did arcade monitors have same pixel aspect ratio as TV sets? anything or something to eat Query about absorption line spectra Can I use my Chinese passport to enter China after I acquired another citizenship? Fuse symbol on toroidal transformer Create all possible words using a set or letters Does the Mind Blank spell prevent the target from being frightened? Can I sign legal documents with a smiley face? When quoting, must I also copy hyphens used to divide words that continue on the next line? Hot bath for aluminium engine block and heads Journal losing indexing services Is it possib
            Read more

            Bunad

            Image
            Tradisjonelle folkedrakter frå Aust-Telemark, truleg frå 1880-åra. Drakter som dette er grunnlaget for moderne bunadar. Foto: Axel Lindahl Bunad frå Eggedal i Buskerud fotografert i 1906. Bunad (frå kledebunad , der norrønt «búnaðr» har same rot som (føre)bu) er ei samnemning brukt om klesdrakter i tradisjonell nordisk stil — ofte utvikla frå folkedrakter, men likevel i ein eigen tradisjon. Ein bunad er typisk ei forseggjort og kostbar drakt, med mykje broderi, og med handsmidde smykke i gull eller sølv, særleg dei særeigne søljene, som obligatorisk prynad i tillegg. Bunad og bunadbruk er eit debattemne med mange ulike oppfatningar, til dømes om kva som er ein bunad, og om ein kan endra på utforminga av draktene eller ikkje. Den norske bunadrørsla går tilbake til folkedansrørsla og føregangsfolk som Hulda Garborg og Klara Semb. I dag blir bunad brukt som nasjonaldrakt. Festbunad er likestilt med galla-antrekk, og ofte nytta ved særskilde høve, som konfirmasjonar eller d
            Read more

            Færeyskur hestur Heimild | Tengill | Tilvísanir | LeiðsagnarvalRossið - síða um færeyska hrossið á færeyskuGott ár hjá færeyska hestinum

            Image
            FæreyjarHestar færeyskahjaltlandshestinumíslenski hesturinnBretlandskolanámumenskuWikipediafæreyskuWikipediaRossið - síða um færeyska hrossið á færeysku Færeyskur hestur Úr Wikipediu, frjálsa alfræðiritinu Jump to navigation Jump to search Rani og Grani. Grani í vetrarfeldi. Færeyski hesturinn (færeyska: Føroyska rossið ) er hestur sem hefur lifað í Færeyjum í hundruði ára. Hann er smágerður, 120-132 cm á hæð, og helst skyldur hjaltlandshestinum. Hlutverk hans var að draga vagna og plóg og bera klyfjar. Hann hefur fjórar gangtegundir eins og íslenski hesturinn (þar með talið tölt) og er með fjölda litaafbrigði. Nú til dags er hann notaður til frístunda. Í lok 19. aldar voru til um 800 hross. Mörg þeirra voru seld til Bretlands til að vinna í kolanámum og um 1960 voru aðeins nokkrir hestar eftir. Átak var gert í að varðveita hestinn og eru nú til 70-80 hross í Færeyjum. [1] Heimild |   Wikimedia Commons er með margmiðlunarefni sem te
            Read more