Is this question ambiguous?





.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty{ margin-bottom:0;
}







-1















The following multiple-choice question was asked in an exam:




Which one is the internal storage device that performs better than its predecessor with spinning disks inside?




  • HDD

  • SSD

  • USB flash drive

  • RAM




I wonder if the question is ambiguous in regards to what with spinning disks inside modifies in it.



Edit: As Prof. Shor had assumed, my main concern here really is whether with spinning disks inside can be thought of as a modifier to what is being asked, and not to the predecessor; ultimately making HDD the answer.










share|improve this question

























  • Please clarify. I assume you're asking what with spinning disks inside modifies.

    – Peter Shor
    Apr 22 at 16:11













  • Yes, your assumption is correct, and I am mainly interested in that. However, I would also be interested if there exists just about any other ambiguities there is. I will edit the question in accordance with my main interest, regardless.

    – ThoAppelsin
    Apr 22 at 16:13











  • I'm sure they want you to pick SSD, but there's nothing technically incorrect about RAM, which is the fastest type of storage. (There also is nonvolatile RAM—such as ferroelectric RAM or the latest magnetoresistive RAM, even though the umbrella acronym for it is NVRAM or NVM.) Even from a technical perspective, it's a poorly worded question.

    – Jason Bassford
    Apr 22 at 16:43













  • As for the actual question, I might rephrase it as than its predecessor which had spinning disks inside. (Even though the technology still exists.) Or possibly (if you don't like that tense) than its spinning-disk-based predecessor.

    – Jason Bassford
    Apr 22 at 16:47








  • 1





    I wouldn't say it's ambiguous. You do need to have a bit of techy knowledge to be sure but that seems to be what they're testing anyway, so it's fair enough. The question can't be asking for a device with a spinning disk because that could only be the HDD, and none of the other devices are predecessors of the HDD that have inferior performance - so you are looking for an internal device that was developed after the HDD, can be used as a replacement for a HDD, and performs better - that can only be the SSD.

    – Minty
    Apr 22 at 17:20


















-1















The following multiple-choice question was asked in an exam:




Which one is the internal storage device that performs better than its predecessor with spinning disks inside?




  • HDD

  • SSD

  • USB flash drive

  • RAM




I wonder if the question is ambiguous in regards to what with spinning disks inside modifies in it.



Edit: As Prof. Shor had assumed, my main concern here really is whether with spinning disks inside can be thought of as a modifier to what is being asked, and not to the predecessor; ultimately making HDD the answer.










share|improve this question

























  • Please clarify. I assume you're asking what with spinning disks inside modifies.

    – Peter Shor
    Apr 22 at 16:11













  • Yes, your assumption is correct, and I am mainly interested in that. However, I would also be interested if there exists just about any other ambiguities there is. I will edit the question in accordance with my main interest, regardless.

    – ThoAppelsin
    Apr 22 at 16:13











  • I'm sure they want you to pick SSD, but there's nothing technically incorrect about RAM, which is the fastest type of storage. (There also is nonvolatile RAM—such as ferroelectric RAM or the latest magnetoresistive RAM, even though the umbrella acronym for it is NVRAM or NVM.) Even from a technical perspective, it's a poorly worded question.

    – Jason Bassford
    Apr 22 at 16:43













  • As for the actual question, I might rephrase it as than its predecessor which had spinning disks inside. (Even though the technology still exists.) Or possibly (if you don't like that tense) than its spinning-disk-based predecessor.

    – Jason Bassford
    Apr 22 at 16:47








  • 1





    I wouldn't say it's ambiguous. You do need to have a bit of techy knowledge to be sure but that seems to be what they're testing anyway, so it's fair enough. The question can't be asking for a device with a spinning disk because that could only be the HDD, and none of the other devices are predecessors of the HDD that have inferior performance - so you are looking for an internal device that was developed after the HDD, can be used as a replacement for a HDD, and performs better - that can only be the SSD.

    – Minty
    Apr 22 at 17:20














-1












-1








-1








The following multiple-choice question was asked in an exam:




Which one is the internal storage device that performs better than its predecessor with spinning disks inside?




  • HDD

  • SSD

  • USB flash drive

  • RAM




I wonder if the question is ambiguous in regards to what with spinning disks inside modifies in it.



Edit: As Prof. Shor had assumed, my main concern here really is whether with spinning disks inside can be thought of as a modifier to what is being asked, and not to the predecessor; ultimately making HDD the answer.










share|improve this question
















The following multiple-choice question was asked in an exam:




Which one is the internal storage device that performs better than its predecessor with spinning disks inside?




  • HDD

  • SSD

  • USB flash drive

  • RAM




I wonder if the question is ambiguous in regards to what with spinning disks inside modifies in it.



Edit: As Prof. Shor had assumed, my main concern here really is whether with spinning disks inside can be thought of as a modifier to what is being asked, and not to the predecessor; ultimately making HDD the answer.







ambiguity syntax prepositional-phrases






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited Apr 22 at 17:26







ThoAppelsin

















asked Apr 22 at 16:04









ThoAppelsinThoAppelsin

18317




18317













  • Please clarify. I assume you're asking what with spinning disks inside modifies.

    – Peter Shor
    Apr 22 at 16:11













  • Yes, your assumption is correct, and I am mainly interested in that. However, I would also be interested if there exists just about any other ambiguities there is. I will edit the question in accordance with my main interest, regardless.

    – ThoAppelsin
    Apr 22 at 16:13











  • I'm sure they want you to pick SSD, but there's nothing technically incorrect about RAM, which is the fastest type of storage. (There also is nonvolatile RAM—such as ferroelectric RAM or the latest magnetoresistive RAM, even though the umbrella acronym for it is NVRAM or NVM.) Even from a technical perspective, it's a poorly worded question.

    – Jason Bassford
    Apr 22 at 16:43













  • As for the actual question, I might rephrase it as than its predecessor which had spinning disks inside. (Even though the technology still exists.) Or possibly (if you don't like that tense) than its spinning-disk-based predecessor.

    – Jason Bassford
    Apr 22 at 16:47








  • 1





    I wouldn't say it's ambiguous. You do need to have a bit of techy knowledge to be sure but that seems to be what they're testing anyway, so it's fair enough. The question can't be asking for a device with a spinning disk because that could only be the HDD, and none of the other devices are predecessors of the HDD that have inferior performance - so you are looking for an internal device that was developed after the HDD, can be used as a replacement for a HDD, and performs better - that can only be the SSD.

    – Minty
    Apr 22 at 17:20



















  • Please clarify. I assume you're asking what with spinning disks inside modifies.

    – Peter Shor
    Apr 22 at 16:11













  • Yes, your assumption is correct, and I am mainly interested in that. However, I would also be interested if there exists just about any other ambiguities there is. I will edit the question in accordance with my main interest, regardless.

    – ThoAppelsin
    Apr 22 at 16:13











  • I'm sure they want you to pick SSD, but there's nothing technically incorrect about RAM, which is the fastest type of storage. (There also is nonvolatile RAM—such as ferroelectric RAM or the latest magnetoresistive RAM, even though the umbrella acronym for it is NVRAM or NVM.) Even from a technical perspective, it's a poorly worded question.

    – Jason Bassford
    Apr 22 at 16:43













  • As for the actual question, I might rephrase it as than its predecessor which had spinning disks inside. (Even though the technology still exists.) Or possibly (if you don't like that tense) than its spinning-disk-based predecessor.

    – Jason Bassford
    Apr 22 at 16:47








  • 1





    I wouldn't say it's ambiguous. You do need to have a bit of techy knowledge to be sure but that seems to be what they're testing anyway, so it's fair enough. The question can't be asking for a device with a spinning disk because that could only be the HDD, and none of the other devices are predecessors of the HDD that have inferior performance - so you are looking for an internal device that was developed after the HDD, can be used as a replacement for a HDD, and performs better - that can only be the SSD.

    – Minty
    Apr 22 at 17:20

















Please clarify. I assume you're asking what with spinning disks inside modifies.

– Peter Shor
Apr 22 at 16:11







Please clarify. I assume you're asking what with spinning disks inside modifies.

– Peter Shor
Apr 22 at 16:11















Yes, your assumption is correct, and I am mainly interested in that. However, I would also be interested if there exists just about any other ambiguities there is. I will edit the question in accordance with my main interest, regardless.

– ThoAppelsin
Apr 22 at 16:13





Yes, your assumption is correct, and I am mainly interested in that. However, I would also be interested if there exists just about any other ambiguities there is. I will edit the question in accordance with my main interest, regardless.

– ThoAppelsin
Apr 22 at 16:13













I'm sure they want you to pick SSD, but there's nothing technically incorrect about RAM, which is the fastest type of storage. (There also is nonvolatile RAM—such as ferroelectric RAM or the latest magnetoresistive RAM, even though the umbrella acronym for it is NVRAM or NVM.) Even from a technical perspective, it's a poorly worded question.

– Jason Bassford
Apr 22 at 16:43







I'm sure they want you to pick SSD, but there's nothing technically incorrect about RAM, which is the fastest type of storage. (There also is nonvolatile RAM—such as ferroelectric RAM or the latest magnetoresistive RAM, even though the umbrella acronym for it is NVRAM or NVM.) Even from a technical perspective, it's a poorly worded question.

– Jason Bassford
Apr 22 at 16:43















As for the actual question, I might rephrase it as than its predecessor which had spinning disks inside. (Even though the technology still exists.) Or possibly (if you don't like that tense) than its spinning-disk-based predecessor.

– Jason Bassford
Apr 22 at 16:47







As for the actual question, I might rephrase it as than its predecessor which had spinning disks inside. (Even though the technology still exists.) Or possibly (if you don't like that tense) than its spinning-disk-based predecessor.

– Jason Bassford
Apr 22 at 16:47






1




1





I wouldn't say it's ambiguous. You do need to have a bit of techy knowledge to be sure but that seems to be what they're testing anyway, so it's fair enough. The question can't be asking for a device with a spinning disk because that could only be the HDD, and none of the other devices are predecessors of the HDD that have inferior performance - so you are looking for an internal device that was developed after the HDD, can be used as a replacement for a HDD, and performs better - that can only be the SSD.

– Minty
Apr 22 at 17:20





I wouldn't say it's ambiguous. You do need to have a bit of techy knowledge to be sure but that seems to be what they're testing anyway, so it's fair enough. The question can't be asking for a device with a spinning disk because that could only be the HDD, and none of the other devices are predecessors of the HDD that have inferior performance - so you are looking for an internal device that was developed after the HDD, can be used as a replacement for a HDD, and performs better - that can only be the SSD.

– Minty
Apr 22 at 17:20










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















1














Grammatically it seems to be ambiguous. "with spinning disks inside" could modify "internal storage device", "performs better", or "predecessor".



However, to someone at all familiar with the devices (the presumed audience for the question), the first two interpretations make little sense. Only one of the listed devices has spinning disks inside, but those interpretations seem to assume that they all do. And if a device can't have spinning disks inside, it's not reasonable to ask if it performs better with spinning disks inside.



The last interpretation does make sense. All the devices have predecessors, and some of those predecessors have spinning disks inside. It's reasonable then to ask which one performs better.



So by process of elimination, only the last interpretation is likely. Also, it's generally common to resolve this ambiguity by choosing the closest preceding phrase for which the prepositional phrase is applicable.






share|improve this answer
























    Your Answer








    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "97"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: false,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: null,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fenglish.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f494840%2fis-this-question-ambiguous%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes








    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    1














    Grammatically it seems to be ambiguous. "with spinning disks inside" could modify "internal storage device", "performs better", or "predecessor".



    However, to someone at all familiar with the devices (the presumed audience for the question), the first two interpretations make little sense. Only one of the listed devices has spinning disks inside, but those interpretations seem to assume that they all do. And if a device can't have spinning disks inside, it's not reasonable to ask if it performs better with spinning disks inside.



    The last interpretation does make sense. All the devices have predecessors, and some of those predecessors have spinning disks inside. It's reasonable then to ask which one performs better.



    So by process of elimination, only the last interpretation is likely. Also, it's generally common to resolve this ambiguity by choosing the closest preceding phrase for which the prepositional phrase is applicable.






    share|improve this answer




























      1














      Grammatically it seems to be ambiguous. "with spinning disks inside" could modify "internal storage device", "performs better", or "predecessor".



      However, to someone at all familiar with the devices (the presumed audience for the question), the first two interpretations make little sense. Only one of the listed devices has spinning disks inside, but those interpretations seem to assume that they all do. And if a device can't have spinning disks inside, it's not reasonable to ask if it performs better with spinning disks inside.



      The last interpretation does make sense. All the devices have predecessors, and some of those predecessors have spinning disks inside. It's reasonable then to ask which one performs better.



      So by process of elimination, only the last interpretation is likely. Also, it's generally common to resolve this ambiguity by choosing the closest preceding phrase for which the prepositional phrase is applicable.






      share|improve this answer


























        1












        1








        1







        Grammatically it seems to be ambiguous. "with spinning disks inside" could modify "internal storage device", "performs better", or "predecessor".



        However, to someone at all familiar with the devices (the presumed audience for the question), the first two interpretations make little sense. Only one of the listed devices has spinning disks inside, but those interpretations seem to assume that they all do. And if a device can't have spinning disks inside, it's not reasonable to ask if it performs better with spinning disks inside.



        The last interpretation does make sense. All the devices have predecessors, and some of those predecessors have spinning disks inside. It's reasonable then to ask which one performs better.



        So by process of elimination, only the last interpretation is likely. Also, it's generally common to resolve this ambiguity by choosing the closest preceding phrase for which the prepositional phrase is applicable.






        share|improve this answer













        Grammatically it seems to be ambiguous. "with spinning disks inside" could modify "internal storage device", "performs better", or "predecessor".



        However, to someone at all familiar with the devices (the presumed audience for the question), the first two interpretations make little sense. Only one of the listed devices has spinning disks inside, but those interpretations seem to assume that they all do. And if a device can't have spinning disks inside, it's not reasonable to ask if it performs better with spinning disks inside.



        The last interpretation does make sense. All the devices have predecessors, and some of those predecessors have spinning disks inside. It's reasonable then to ask which one performs better.



        So by process of elimination, only the last interpretation is likely. Also, it's generally common to resolve this ambiguity by choosing the closest preceding phrase for which the prepositional phrase is applicable.







        share|improve this answer












        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer










        answered Apr 24 at 8:03









        BarmarBarmar

        10.1k1529




        10.1k1529






























            draft saved

            draft discarded




















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to English Language & Usage Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fenglish.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f494840%2fis-this-question-ambiguous%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Færeyskur hestur Heimild | Tengill | Tilvísanir | LeiðsagnarvalRossið - síða um færeyska hrossið á færeyskuGott ár hjá færeyska hestinum

            He _____ here since 1970 . Answer needed [closed]What does “since he was so high” mean?Meaning of “catch birds for”?How do I ensure “since” takes the meaning I want?“Who cares here” meaningWhat does “right round toward” mean?the time tense (had now been detected)What does the phrase “ring around the roses” mean here?Correct usage of “visited upon”Meaning of “foiled rail sabotage bid”It was the third time I had gone to Rome or It is the third time I had been to Rome

            Slayer Innehåll Historia | Stil, komposition och lyrik | Bandets betydelse och framgångar | Sidoprojekt och samarbeten | Kontroverser | Medlemmar | Utmärkelser och nomineringar | Turnéer och festivaler | Diskografi | Referenser | Externa länkar | Navigeringsmenywww.slayer.net”Metal Massacre vol. 1””Metal Massacre vol. 3””Metal Massacre Volume III””Show No Mercy””Haunting the Chapel””Live Undead””Hell Awaits””Reign in Blood””Reign in Blood””Gold & Platinum – Reign in Blood””Golden Gods Awards Winners”originalet”Kerrang! Hall Of Fame””Slayer Looks Back On 37-Year Career In New Video Series: Part Two””South of Heaven””Gold & Platinum – South of Heaven””Seasons in the Abyss””Gold & Platinum - Seasons in the Abyss””Divine Intervention””Divine Intervention - Release group by Slayer””Gold & Platinum - Divine Intervention””Live Intrusion””Undisputed Attitude””Abolish Government/Superficial Love””Release “Slatanic Slaughter: A Tribute to Slayer” by Various Artists””Diabolus in Musica””Soundtrack to the Apocalypse””God Hates Us All””Systematic - Relationships””War at the Warfield””Gold & Platinum - War at the Warfield””Soundtrack to the Apocalypse””Gold & Platinum - Still Reigning””Metallica, Slayer, Iron Mauden Among Winners At Metal Hammer Awards””Eternal Pyre””Eternal Pyre - Slayer release group””Eternal Pyre””Metal Storm Awards 2006””Kerrang! Hall Of Fame””Slayer Wins 'Best Metal' Grammy Award””Slayer Guitarist Jeff Hanneman Dies””Bullet-For My Valentine booed at Metal Hammer Golden Gods Awards””Unholy Aliance””The End Of Slayer?””Slayer: We Could Thrash Out Two More Albums If We're Fast Enough...””'The Unholy Alliance: Chapter III' UK Dates Added”originalet”Megadeth And Slayer To Co-Headline 'Canadian Carnage' Trek”originalet”World Painted Blood””Release “World Painted Blood” by Slayer””Metallica Heading To Cinemas””Slayer, Megadeth To Join Forces For 'European Carnage' Tour - Dec. 18, 2010”originalet”Slayer's Hanneman Contracts Acute Infection; Band To Bring In Guest Guitarist””Cannibal Corpse's Pat O'Brien Will Step In As Slayer's Guest Guitarist”originalet”Slayer’s Jeff Hanneman Dead at 49””Dave Lombardo Says He Made Only $67,000 In 2011 While Touring With Slayer””Slayer: We Do Not Agree With Dave Lombardo's Substance Or Timeline Of Events””Slayer Welcomes Drummer Paul Bostaph Back To The Fold””Slayer Hope to Unveil Never-Before-Heard Jeff Hanneman Material on Next Album””Slayer Debut New Song 'Implode' During Surprise Golden Gods Appearance””Release group Repentless by Slayer””Repentless - Slayer - Credits””Slayer””Metal Storm Awards 2015””Slayer - to release comic book "Repentless #1"””Slayer To Release 'Repentless' 6.66" Vinyl Box Set””BREAKING NEWS: Slayer Announce Farewell Tour””Slayer Recruit Lamb of God, Anthrax, Behemoth + Testament for Final Tour””Slayer lägger ner efter 37 år””Slayer Announces Second North American Leg Of 'Final' Tour””Final World Tour””Slayer Announces Final European Tour With Lamb of God, Anthrax And Obituary””Slayer To Tour Europe With Lamb of God, Anthrax And Obituary””Slayer To Play 'Last French Show Ever' At Next Year's Hellfst””Slayer's Final World Tour Will Extend Into 2019””Death Angel's Rob Cavestany On Slayer's 'Farewell' Tour: 'Some Of Us Could See This Coming'””Testament Has No Plans To Retire Anytime Soon, Says Chuck Billy””Anthrax's Scott Ian On Slayer's 'Farewell' Tour Plans: 'I Was Surprised And I Wasn't Surprised'””Slayer””Slayer's Morbid Schlock””Review/Rock; For Slayer, the Mania Is the Message””Slayer - Biography””Slayer - Reign In Blood”originalet”Dave Lombardo””An exclusive oral history of Slayer”originalet”Exclusive! Interview With Slayer Guitarist Jeff Hanneman”originalet”Thinking Out Loud: Slayer's Kerry King on hair metal, Satan and being polite””Slayer Lyrics””Slayer - Biography””Most influential artists for extreme metal music””Slayer - Reign in Blood””Slayer guitarist Jeff Hanneman dies aged 49””Slatanic Slaughter: A Tribute to Slayer””Gateway to Hell: A Tribute to Slayer””Covered In Blood””Slayer: The Origins of Thrash in San Francisco, CA.””Why They Rule - #6 Slayer”originalet”Guitar World's 100 Greatest Heavy Metal Guitarists Of All Time”originalet”The fans have spoken: Slayer comes out on top in readers' polls”originalet”Tribute to Jeff Hanneman (1964-2013)””Lamb Of God Frontman: We Sound Like A Slayer Rip-Off””BEHEMOTH Frontman Pays Tribute To SLAYER's JEFF HANNEMAN””Slayer, Hatebreed Doing Double Duty On This Year's Ozzfest””System of a Down””Lacuna Coil’s Andrea Ferro Talks Influences, Skateboarding, Band Origins + More””Slayer - Reign in Blood””Into The Lungs of Hell””Slayer rules - en utställning om fans””Slayer and Their Fans Slashed Through a No-Holds-Barred Night at Gas Monkey””Home””Slayer””Gold & Platinum - The Big 4 Live from Sofia, Bulgaria””Exclusive! Interview With Slayer Guitarist Kerry King””2008-02-23: Wiltern, Los Angeles, CA, USA””Slayer's Kerry King To Perform With Megadeth Tonight! - Oct. 21, 2010”originalet”Dave Lombardo - Biography”Slayer Case DismissedArkiveradUltimate Classic Rock: Slayer guitarist Jeff Hanneman dead at 49.”Slayer: "We could never do any thing like Some Kind Of Monster..."””Cannibal Corpse'S Pat O'Brien Will Step In As Slayer'S Guest Guitarist | The Official Slayer Site”originalet”Slayer Wins 'Best Metal' Grammy Award””Slayer Guitarist Jeff Hanneman Dies””Kerrang! Awards 2006 Blog: Kerrang! Hall Of Fame””Kerrang! Awards 2013: Kerrang! Legend”originalet”Metallica, Slayer, Iron Maien Among Winners At Metal Hammer Awards””Metal Hammer Golden Gods Awards””Bullet For My Valentine Booed At Metal Hammer Golden Gods Awards””Metal Storm Awards 2006””Metal Storm Awards 2015””Slayer's Concert History””Slayer - Relationships””Slayer - Releases”Slayers officiella webbplatsSlayer på MusicBrainzOfficiell webbplatsSlayerSlayerr1373445760000 0001 1540 47353068615-5086262726cb13906545x(data)6033143kn20030215029