Why datecode is SO IMPORTANT to chip manufacturers?





.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty{ margin-bottom:0;
}







6












$begingroup$


With the miniaturization of the devices, chip marking has shrunk, not only in size, but also in content.



And while the part number got compressed to as little as two letters (or in some cases disappeared completely?), the datecode/lot number looks to be there to stay.



sot-89 example



But how this information can be useful to the manufacturers? Let's imagine that a defective lot gets to the market, and the buyer reports to the manufacturer the lot number/datecode of that chip. What happens next? Is the manufacturer going to retire from market all the pieces from that lot? Is it just for an internal investigation?










share|improve this question









$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Here is an example of a IC problem where a range of dates is known to be impacted.
    $endgroup$
    – user71659
    Apr 20 at 23:56


















6












$begingroup$


With the miniaturization of the devices, chip marking has shrunk, not only in size, but also in content.



And while the part number got compressed to as little as two letters (or in some cases disappeared completely?), the datecode/lot number looks to be there to stay.



sot-89 example



But how this information can be useful to the manufacturers? Let's imagine that a defective lot gets to the market, and the buyer reports to the manufacturer the lot number/datecode of that chip. What happens next? Is the manufacturer going to retire from market all the pieces from that lot? Is it just for an internal investigation?










share|improve this question









$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Here is an example of a IC problem where a range of dates is known to be impacted.
    $endgroup$
    – user71659
    Apr 20 at 23:56














6












6








6





$begingroup$


With the miniaturization of the devices, chip marking has shrunk, not only in size, but also in content.



And while the part number got compressed to as little as two letters (or in some cases disappeared completely?), the datecode/lot number looks to be there to stay.



sot-89 example



But how this information can be useful to the manufacturers? Let's imagine that a defective lot gets to the market, and the buyer reports to the manufacturer the lot number/datecode of that chip. What happens next? Is the manufacturer going to retire from market all the pieces from that lot? Is it just for an internal investigation?










share|improve this question









$endgroup$




With the miniaturization of the devices, chip marking has shrunk, not only in size, but also in content.



And while the part number got compressed to as little as two letters (or in some cases disappeared completely?), the datecode/lot number looks to be there to stay.



sot-89 example



But how this information can be useful to the manufacturers? Let's imagine that a defective lot gets to the market, and the buyer reports to the manufacturer the lot number/datecode of that chip. What happens next? Is the manufacturer going to retire from market all the pieces from that lot? Is it just for an internal investigation?







solid-state-devices markings






share|improve this question













share|improve this question











share|improve this question




share|improve this question










asked Apr 20 at 11:19









valerio_newvalerio_new

523315




523315












  • $begingroup$
    Here is an example of a IC problem where a range of dates is known to be impacted.
    $endgroup$
    – user71659
    Apr 20 at 23:56


















  • $begingroup$
    Here is an example of a IC problem where a range of dates is known to be impacted.
    $endgroup$
    – user71659
    Apr 20 at 23:56
















$begingroup$
Here is an example of a IC problem where a range of dates is known to be impacted.
$endgroup$
– user71659
Apr 20 at 23:56




$begingroup$
Here is an example of a IC problem where a range of dates is known to be impacted.
$endgroup$
– user71659
Apr 20 at 23:56










4 Answers
4






active

oldest

votes


















18












$begingroup$

Date codes (and sometimes batch codes which are usually on the packaging) are important for traceability both for the device manufacturer and the customer.



In safety critical applications (such as flight controls) the date and (if available) batch code of every possible component is recorded against the serial number of the PCB they are fitted on and which final assembly contains that PCB.



If a set of similar failures occur sooner than expected (yes, we expect the boxes to fail at some point) then batch issues become a prime suspect; we don't really care just how the date code or batch code has been stated provided full traceability can be established.



The high reliability industries typically buy components from relatively few suppliers (distributors in particular) for this very reason; I have seen batch failure issues a couple of years post manufacture (but where the expected MTBF was expected to be 5 years or more) and when that can be proved, the supplier is always informed. It is then up to them to see if a part of that overall batch was sold to another customer and inform them of a (now) known reliability issue.



They will also inform the device manufacturer who may (or may not depending on the manufacturer) investigate the cause of the failure. It is in the interest of the manufacturer to do this both for their own quality assurance purposes and the confidence of the equipment manufacturers in their parts.



As many manufacturers have numerous fabrication plants scattered across the globe, knowing the date and batch codes (which often has a code for the plant where the device was manufactured), it also helps them understand which plants may need a bit of attention.



So a primary underlying purpose is traceability.



The reason that relatively few distributors are used is that traceability costs money and requires systems to be set up to perform the necessary tasks (such as storing the data and holding that data for extended periods of time); to cover those extra costs to the distributor, the parts have a (small) premium on the price. The manufacturers typically bring this back down by doing large amounts of business with distributors that can meet the traceability requirements (of which there are not really that many).



Note that for companies where such traceability is required, the cost of managing the supply chain is quite high; the more suppliers they have, the more it costs so agreements are usually put in place with a few key suppliers; if they cannot source parts, then a certified broker needs to be used.



As noted by The Photon (in the comments) date codes can be a very useful troubleshooting aid, particularly for 'picky circuits'.






share|improve this answer











$endgroup$









  • 1




    $begingroup$
    oh, nice to hear firsthand experience from aerospace engineering! +1.
    $endgroup$
    – Marcus Müller
    Apr 20 at 12:11










  • $begingroup$
    I didn't thought to traceability, it's a very interesting application. Could you clarify what do you mean when you say that "The high reliability industries typically buy components from relatively few suppliers"? How this relates to traceability and/or the need for reliability? Thank you for your answer!
    $endgroup$
    – valerio_new
    Apr 20 at 12:24










  • $begingroup$
    See updated answer
    $endgroup$
    – Peter Smith
    Apr 20 at 12:40






  • 5




    $begingroup$
    Even in a much less reliability-focused application area, I've debugged many faults down to "bad datecodes". And also once had to support a design that only worked with particular datecodes of a digital IC (that had the right propagation delays to work in a fussy circuit).
    $endgroup$
    – The Photon
    Apr 20 at 14:21










  • $begingroup$
    @ThePhoton - good point about troubleshooting (I have had my share of bad datecode parts). Noted in the answer.
    $endgroup$
    – Peter Smith
    Apr 21 at 15:48



















3












$begingroup$

It's just like experation dates on food: Electronic components have specified shelf life, and might need to be e.g. baked/dried after that, or disposed of.



So, this is less for tracing faults than it is for people to know what they're buying.



There's several places that sell overstock/overaged components at lower prices, and you wouldn't want to end up with their products if your use case demanded the reliability only guaranteed for parts within their specified shelf life.






share|improve this answer









$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    That could be an explaination, but if this was the case, i'd expect a more intelligible form for the final user. Instead, it seems that datecodes got more and more cryptic in the years
    $endgroup$
    – valerio_new
    Apr 20 at 11:36






  • 5




    $begingroup$
    I'd think that is wishful thinking rather than a sensible argument against this explanation. Datecodes serve no user-readable purpose; they are for looking up. Full "human" dates simply don't fit.
    $endgroup$
    – Marcus Müller
    Apr 20 at 11:41






  • 3




    $begingroup$
    You can get these datecode tables from the manufacturers!
    $endgroup$
    – Marcus Müller
    Apr 20 at 11:58






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    I think the food analogy of shelf life is poor. Rather in food recalls the batch number is the significant detail. Making semiconductors requires a lot of sequential processes. One goof in one process could adversely effect the durability of a whole batch of transistors.
    $endgroup$
    – MaxW
    Apr 20 at 21:34






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    What kind of phenomena could cause a chip to degrade when stored on a shelf, if stored in appropriate conditions (good temperature, no humidity, no nuclear radiations, no acceleration ...) ? Cosmic rays ? Atoms decaying ?
    $endgroup$
    – Gabriel Devillers
    Apr 20 at 22:50





















0












$begingroup$

Age failures can also be expected in ICs, especially the high density types, because of metal migration, causing defects






share|improve this answer









$endgroup$





















    0












    $begingroup$

    The part code is completely irrelevant. The full part name is posted on the wheel or the tube as long the parts are on the shelf. The full name is in the PCB files as soon the part is used.



    What's not in the PCB files is the date code. That is because manufacturing PCBs is usually not done in the design house. Firms may have their own PCB production plant but it's serving several design houses in the company then. So this information, who got which date code of the part, is easily lost.



    That's why it's printed on the part prominently. You may trust your files but it's better to be able to look at the PCB in question and confirm your files are correct about that part before disassembling it.






    share|improve this answer









    $endgroup$













    • $begingroup$
      Very true. Once a PCB has passed functional testing all the parts are known to be the correct ones and repairs outside of authorised facilities are seldom given any priority. The datecode is still useful for debugging by in-house staff who have all the other documentation.
      $endgroup$
      – KalleMP
      Apr 22 at 11:36












    Your Answer






    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
    return StackExchange.using("schematics", function () {
    StackExchange.schematics.init();
    });
    }, "cicuitlab");

    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "135"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: false,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: null,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2felectronics.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f433581%2fwhy-datecode-is-so-important-to-chip-manufacturers%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    4 Answers
    4






    active

    oldest

    votes








    4 Answers
    4






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    18












    $begingroup$

    Date codes (and sometimes batch codes which are usually on the packaging) are important for traceability both for the device manufacturer and the customer.



    In safety critical applications (such as flight controls) the date and (if available) batch code of every possible component is recorded against the serial number of the PCB they are fitted on and which final assembly contains that PCB.



    If a set of similar failures occur sooner than expected (yes, we expect the boxes to fail at some point) then batch issues become a prime suspect; we don't really care just how the date code or batch code has been stated provided full traceability can be established.



    The high reliability industries typically buy components from relatively few suppliers (distributors in particular) for this very reason; I have seen batch failure issues a couple of years post manufacture (but where the expected MTBF was expected to be 5 years or more) and when that can be proved, the supplier is always informed. It is then up to them to see if a part of that overall batch was sold to another customer and inform them of a (now) known reliability issue.



    They will also inform the device manufacturer who may (or may not depending on the manufacturer) investigate the cause of the failure. It is in the interest of the manufacturer to do this both for their own quality assurance purposes and the confidence of the equipment manufacturers in their parts.



    As many manufacturers have numerous fabrication plants scattered across the globe, knowing the date and batch codes (which often has a code for the plant where the device was manufactured), it also helps them understand which plants may need a bit of attention.



    So a primary underlying purpose is traceability.



    The reason that relatively few distributors are used is that traceability costs money and requires systems to be set up to perform the necessary tasks (such as storing the data and holding that data for extended periods of time); to cover those extra costs to the distributor, the parts have a (small) premium on the price. The manufacturers typically bring this back down by doing large amounts of business with distributors that can meet the traceability requirements (of which there are not really that many).



    Note that for companies where such traceability is required, the cost of managing the supply chain is quite high; the more suppliers they have, the more it costs so agreements are usually put in place with a few key suppliers; if they cannot source parts, then a certified broker needs to be used.



    As noted by The Photon (in the comments) date codes can be a very useful troubleshooting aid, particularly for 'picky circuits'.






    share|improve this answer











    $endgroup$









    • 1




      $begingroup$
      oh, nice to hear firsthand experience from aerospace engineering! +1.
      $endgroup$
      – Marcus Müller
      Apr 20 at 12:11










    • $begingroup$
      I didn't thought to traceability, it's a very interesting application. Could you clarify what do you mean when you say that "The high reliability industries typically buy components from relatively few suppliers"? How this relates to traceability and/or the need for reliability? Thank you for your answer!
      $endgroup$
      – valerio_new
      Apr 20 at 12:24










    • $begingroup$
      See updated answer
      $endgroup$
      – Peter Smith
      Apr 20 at 12:40






    • 5




      $begingroup$
      Even in a much less reliability-focused application area, I've debugged many faults down to "bad datecodes". And also once had to support a design that only worked with particular datecodes of a digital IC (that had the right propagation delays to work in a fussy circuit).
      $endgroup$
      – The Photon
      Apr 20 at 14:21










    • $begingroup$
      @ThePhoton - good point about troubleshooting (I have had my share of bad datecode parts). Noted in the answer.
      $endgroup$
      – Peter Smith
      Apr 21 at 15:48
















    18












    $begingroup$

    Date codes (and sometimes batch codes which are usually on the packaging) are important for traceability both for the device manufacturer and the customer.



    In safety critical applications (such as flight controls) the date and (if available) batch code of every possible component is recorded against the serial number of the PCB they are fitted on and which final assembly contains that PCB.



    If a set of similar failures occur sooner than expected (yes, we expect the boxes to fail at some point) then batch issues become a prime suspect; we don't really care just how the date code or batch code has been stated provided full traceability can be established.



    The high reliability industries typically buy components from relatively few suppliers (distributors in particular) for this very reason; I have seen batch failure issues a couple of years post manufacture (but where the expected MTBF was expected to be 5 years or more) and when that can be proved, the supplier is always informed. It is then up to them to see if a part of that overall batch was sold to another customer and inform them of a (now) known reliability issue.



    They will also inform the device manufacturer who may (or may not depending on the manufacturer) investigate the cause of the failure. It is in the interest of the manufacturer to do this both for their own quality assurance purposes and the confidence of the equipment manufacturers in their parts.



    As many manufacturers have numerous fabrication plants scattered across the globe, knowing the date and batch codes (which often has a code for the plant where the device was manufactured), it also helps them understand which plants may need a bit of attention.



    So a primary underlying purpose is traceability.



    The reason that relatively few distributors are used is that traceability costs money and requires systems to be set up to perform the necessary tasks (such as storing the data and holding that data for extended periods of time); to cover those extra costs to the distributor, the parts have a (small) premium on the price. The manufacturers typically bring this back down by doing large amounts of business with distributors that can meet the traceability requirements (of which there are not really that many).



    Note that for companies where such traceability is required, the cost of managing the supply chain is quite high; the more suppliers they have, the more it costs so agreements are usually put in place with a few key suppliers; if they cannot source parts, then a certified broker needs to be used.



    As noted by The Photon (in the comments) date codes can be a very useful troubleshooting aid, particularly for 'picky circuits'.






    share|improve this answer











    $endgroup$









    • 1




      $begingroup$
      oh, nice to hear firsthand experience from aerospace engineering! +1.
      $endgroup$
      – Marcus Müller
      Apr 20 at 12:11










    • $begingroup$
      I didn't thought to traceability, it's a very interesting application. Could you clarify what do you mean when you say that "The high reliability industries typically buy components from relatively few suppliers"? How this relates to traceability and/or the need for reliability? Thank you for your answer!
      $endgroup$
      – valerio_new
      Apr 20 at 12:24










    • $begingroup$
      See updated answer
      $endgroup$
      – Peter Smith
      Apr 20 at 12:40






    • 5




      $begingroup$
      Even in a much less reliability-focused application area, I've debugged many faults down to "bad datecodes". And also once had to support a design that only worked with particular datecodes of a digital IC (that had the right propagation delays to work in a fussy circuit).
      $endgroup$
      – The Photon
      Apr 20 at 14:21










    • $begingroup$
      @ThePhoton - good point about troubleshooting (I have had my share of bad datecode parts). Noted in the answer.
      $endgroup$
      – Peter Smith
      Apr 21 at 15:48














    18












    18








    18





    $begingroup$

    Date codes (and sometimes batch codes which are usually on the packaging) are important for traceability both for the device manufacturer and the customer.



    In safety critical applications (such as flight controls) the date and (if available) batch code of every possible component is recorded against the serial number of the PCB they are fitted on and which final assembly contains that PCB.



    If a set of similar failures occur sooner than expected (yes, we expect the boxes to fail at some point) then batch issues become a prime suspect; we don't really care just how the date code or batch code has been stated provided full traceability can be established.



    The high reliability industries typically buy components from relatively few suppliers (distributors in particular) for this very reason; I have seen batch failure issues a couple of years post manufacture (but where the expected MTBF was expected to be 5 years or more) and when that can be proved, the supplier is always informed. It is then up to them to see if a part of that overall batch was sold to another customer and inform them of a (now) known reliability issue.



    They will also inform the device manufacturer who may (or may not depending on the manufacturer) investigate the cause of the failure. It is in the interest of the manufacturer to do this both for their own quality assurance purposes and the confidence of the equipment manufacturers in their parts.



    As many manufacturers have numerous fabrication plants scattered across the globe, knowing the date and batch codes (which often has a code for the plant where the device was manufactured), it also helps them understand which plants may need a bit of attention.



    So a primary underlying purpose is traceability.



    The reason that relatively few distributors are used is that traceability costs money and requires systems to be set up to perform the necessary tasks (such as storing the data and holding that data for extended periods of time); to cover those extra costs to the distributor, the parts have a (small) premium on the price. The manufacturers typically bring this back down by doing large amounts of business with distributors that can meet the traceability requirements (of which there are not really that many).



    Note that for companies where such traceability is required, the cost of managing the supply chain is quite high; the more suppliers they have, the more it costs so agreements are usually put in place with a few key suppliers; if they cannot source parts, then a certified broker needs to be used.



    As noted by The Photon (in the comments) date codes can be a very useful troubleshooting aid, particularly for 'picky circuits'.






    share|improve this answer











    $endgroup$



    Date codes (and sometimes batch codes which are usually on the packaging) are important for traceability both for the device manufacturer and the customer.



    In safety critical applications (such as flight controls) the date and (if available) batch code of every possible component is recorded against the serial number of the PCB they are fitted on and which final assembly contains that PCB.



    If a set of similar failures occur sooner than expected (yes, we expect the boxes to fail at some point) then batch issues become a prime suspect; we don't really care just how the date code or batch code has been stated provided full traceability can be established.



    The high reliability industries typically buy components from relatively few suppliers (distributors in particular) for this very reason; I have seen batch failure issues a couple of years post manufacture (but where the expected MTBF was expected to be 5 years or more) and when that can be proved, the supplier is always informed. It is then up to them to see if a part of that overall batch was sold to another customer and inform them of a (now) known reliability issue.



    They will also inform the device manufacturer who may (or may not depending on the manufacturer) investigate the cause of the failure. It is in the interest of the manufacturer to do this both for their own quality assurance purposes and the confidence of the equipment manufacturers in their parts.



    As many manufacturers have numerous fabrication plants scattered across the globe, knowing the date and batch codes (which often has a code for the plant where the device was manufactured), it also helps them understand which plants may need a bit of attention.



    So a primary underlying purpose is traceability.



    The reason that relatively few distributors are used is that traceability costs money and requires systems to be set up to perform the necessary tasks (such as storing the data and holding that data for extended periods of time); to cover those extra costs to the distributor, the parts have a (small) premium on the price. The manufacturers typically bring this back down by doing large amounts of business with distributors that can meet the traceability requirements (of which there are not really that many).



    Note that for companies where such traceability is required, the cost of managing the supply chain is quite high; the more suppliers they have, the more it costs so agreements are usually put in place with a few key suppliers; if they cannot source parts, then a certified broker needs to be used.



    As noted by The Photon (in the comments) date codes can be a very useful troubleshooting aid, particularly for 'picky circuits'.







    share|improve this answer














    share|improve this answer



    share|improve this answer








    edited Apr 21 at 15:42

























    answered Apr 20 at 12:07









    Peter SmithPeter Smith

    15.5k11341




    15.5k11341








    • 1




      $begingroup$
      oh, nice to hear firsthand experience from aerospace engineering! +1.
      $endgroup$
      – Marcus Müller
      Apr 20 at 12:11










    • $begingroup$
      I didn't thought to traceability, it's a very interesting application. Could you clarify what do you mean when you say that "The high reliability industries typically buy components from relatively few suppliers"? How this relates to traceability and/or the need for reliability? Thank you for your answer!
      $endgroup$
      – valerio_new
      Apr 20 at 12:24










    • $begingroup$
      See updated answer
      $endgroup$
      – Peter Smith
      Apr 20 at 12:40






    • 5




      $begingroup$
      Even in a much less reliability-focused application area, I've debugged many faults down to "bad datecodes". And also once had to support a design that only worked with particular datecodes of a digital IC (that had the right propagation delays to work in a fussy circuit).
      $endgroup$
      – The Photon
      Apr 20 at 14:21










    • $begingroup$
      @ThePhoton - good point about troubleshooting (I have had my share of bad datecode parts). Noted in the answer.
      $endgroup$
      – Peter Smith
      Apr 21 at 15:48














    • 1




      $begingroup$
      oh, nice to hear firsthand experience from aerospace engineering! +1.
      $endgroup$
      – Marcus Müller
      Apr 20 at 12:11










    • $begingroup$
      I didn't thought to traceability, it's a very interesting application. Could you clarify what do you mean when you say that "The high reliability industries typically buy components from relatively few suppliers"? How this relates to traceability and/or the need for reliability? Thank you for your answer!
      $endgroup$
      – valerio_new
      Apr 20 at 12:24










    • $begingroup$
      See updated answer
      $endgroup$
      – Peter Smith
      Apr 20 at 12:40






    • 5




      $begingroup$
      Even in a much less reliability-focused application area, I've debugged many faults down to "bad datecodes". And also once had to support a design that only worked with particular datecodes of a digital IC (that had the right propagation delays to work in a fussy circuit).
      $endgroup$
      – The Photon
      Apr 20 at 14:21










    • $begingroup$
      @ThePhoton - good point about troubleshooting (I have had my share of bad datecode parts). Noted in the answer.
      $endgroup$
      – Peter Smith
      Apr 21 at 15:48








    1




    1




    $begingroup$
    oh, nice to hear firsthand experience from aerospace engineering! +1.
    $endgroup$
    – Marcus Müller
    Apr 20 at 12:11




    $begingroup$
    oh, nice to hear firsthand experience from aerospace engineering! +1.
    $endgroup$
    – Marcus Müller
    Apr 20 at 12:11












    $begingroup$
    I didn't thought to traceability, it's a very interesting application. Could you clarify what do you mean when you say that "The high reliability industries typically buy components from relatively few suppliers"? How this relates to traceability and/or the need for reliability? Thank you for your answer!
    $endgroup$
    – valerio_new
    Apr 20 at 12:24




    $begingroup$
    I didn't thought to traceability, it's a very interesting application. Could you clarify what do you mean when you say that "The high reliability industries typically buy components from relatively few suppliers"? How this relates to traceability and/or the need for reliability? Thank you for your answer!
    $endgroup$
    – valerio_new
    Apr 20 at 12:24












    $begingroup$
    See updated answer
    $endgroup$
    – Peter Smith
    Apr 20 at 12:40




    $begingroup$
    See updated answer
    $endgroup$
    – Peter Smith
    Apr 20 at 12:40




    5




    5




    $begingroup$
    Even in a much less reliability-focused application area, I've debugged many faults down to "bad datecodes". And also once had to support a design that only worked with particular datecodes of a digital IC (that had the right propagation delays to work in a fussy circuit).
    $endgroup$
    – The Photon
    Apr 20 at 14:21




    $begingroup$
    Even in a much less reliability-focused application area, I've debugged many faults down to "bad datecodes". And also once had to support a design that only worked with particular datecodes of a digital IC (that had the right propagation delays to work in a fussy circuit).
    $endgroup$
    – The Photon
    Apr 20 at 14:21












    $begingroup$
    @ThePhoton - good point about troubleshooting (I have had my share of bad datecode parts). Noted in the answer.
    $endgroup$
    – Peter Smith
    Apr 21 at 15:48




    $begingroup$
    @ThePhoton - good point about troubleshooting (I have had my share of bad datecode parts). Noted in the answer.
    $endgroup$
    – Peter Smith
    Apr 21 at 15:48













    3












    $begingroup$

    It's just like experation dates on food: Electronic components have specified shelf life, and might need to be e.g. baked/dried after that, or disposed of.



    So, this is less for tracing faults than it is for people to know what they're buying.



    There's several places that sell overstock/overaged components at lower prices, and you wouldn't want to end up with their products if your use case demanded the reliability only guaranteed for parts within their specified shelf life.






    share|improve this answer









    $endgroup$













    • $begingroup$
      That could be an explaination, but if this was the case, i'd expect a more intelligible form for the final user. Instead, it seems that datecodes got more and more cryptic in the years
      $endgroup$
      – valerio_new
      Apr 20 at 11:36






    • 5




      $begingroup$
      I'd think that is wishful thinking rather than a sensible argument against this explanation. Datecodes serve no user-readable purpose; they are for looking up. Full "human" dates simply don't fit.
      $endgroup$
      – Marcus Müller
      Apr 20 at 11:41






    • 3




      $begingroup$
      You can get these datecode tables from the manufacturers!
      $endgroup$
      – Marcus Müller
      Apr 20 at 11:58






    • 1




      $begingroup$
      I think the food analogy of shelf life is poor. Rather in food recalls the batch number is the significant detail. Making semiconductors requires a lot of sequential processes. One goof in one process could adversely effect the durability of a whole batch of transistors.
      $endgroup$
      – MaxW
      Apr 20 at 21:34






    • 2




      $begingroup$
      What kind of phenomena could cause a chip to degrade when stored on a shelf, if stored in appropriate conditions (good temperature, no humidity, no nuclear radiations, no acceleration ...) ? Cosmic rays ? Atoms decaying ?
      $endgroup$
      – Gabriel Devillers
      Apr 20 at 22:50


















    3












    $begingroup$

    It's just like experation dates on food: Electronic components have specified shelf life, and might need to be e.g. baked/dried after that, or disposed of.



    So, this is less for tracing faults than it is for people to know what they're buying.



    There's several places that sell overstock/overaged components at lower prices, and you wouldn't want to end up with their products if your use case demanded the reliability only guaranteed for parts within their specified shelf life.






    share|improve this answer









    $endgroup$













    • $begingroup$
      That could be an explaination, but if this was the case, i'd expect a more intelligible form for the final user. Instead, it seems that datecodes got more and more cryptic in the years
      $endgroup$
      – valerio_new
      Apr 20 at 11:36






    • 5




      $begingroup$
      I'd think that is wishful thinking rather than a sensible argument against this explanation. Datecodes serve no user-readable purpose; they are for looking up. Full "human" dates simply don't fit.
      $endgroup$
      – Marcus Müller
      Apr 20 at 11:41






    • 3




      $begingroup$
      You can get these datecode tables from the manufacturers!
      $endgroup$
      – Marcus Müller
      Apr 20 at 11:58






    • 1




      $begingroup$
      I think the food analogy of shelf life is poor. Rather in food recalls the batch number is the significant detail. Making semiconductors requires a lot of sequential processes. One goof in one process could adversely effect the durability of a whole batch of transistors.
      $endgroup$
      – MaxW
      Apr 20 at 21:34






    • 2




      $begingroup$
      What kind of phenomena could cause a chip to degrade when stored on a shelf, if stored in appropriate conditions (good temperature, no humidity, no nuclear radiations, no acceleration ...) ? Cosmic rays ? Atoms decaying ?
      $endgroup$
      – Gabriel Devillers
      Apr 20 at 22:50
















    3












    3








    3





    $begingroup$

    It's just like experation dates on food: Electronic components have specified shelf life, and might need to be e.g. baked/dried after that, or disposed of.



    So, this is less for tracing faults than it is for people to know what they're buying.



    There's several places that sell overstock/overaged components at lower prices, and you wouldn't want to end up with their products if your use case demanded the reliability only guaranteed for parts within their specified shelf life.






    share|improve this answer









    $endgroup$



    It's just like experation dates on food: Electronic components have specified shelf life, and might need to be e.g. baked/dried after that, or disposed of.



    So, this is less for tracing faults than it is for people to know what they're buying.



    There's several places that sell overstock/overaged components at lower prices, and you wouldn't want to end up with their products if your use case demanded the reliability only guaranteed for parts within their specified shelf life.







    share|improve this answer












    share|improve this answer



    share|improve this answer










    answered Apr 20 at 11:26









    Marcus MüllerMarcus Müller

    36.8k364104




    36.8k364104












    • $begingroup$
      That could be an explaination, but if this was the case, i'd expect a more intelligible form for the final user. Instead, it seems that datecodes got more and more cryptic in the years
      $endgroup$
      – valerio_new
      Apr 20 at 11:36






    • 5




      $begingroup$
      I'd think that is wishful thinking rather than a sensible argument against this explanation. Datecodes serve no user-readable purpose; they are for looking up. Full "human" dates simply don't fit.
      $endgroup$
      – Marcus Müller
      Apr 20 at 11:41






    • 3




      $begingroup$
      You can get these datecode tables from the manufacturers!
      $endgroup$
      – Marcus Müller
      Apr 20 at 11:58






    • 1




      $begingroup$
      I think the food analogy of shelf life is poor. Rather in food recalls the batch number is the significant detail. Making semiconductors requires a lot of sequential processes. One goof in one process could adversely effect the durability of a whole batch of transistors.
      $endgroup$
      – MaxW
      Apr 20 at 21:34






    • 2




      $begingroup$
      What kind of phenomena could cause a chip to degrade when stored on a shelf, if stored in appropriate conditions (good temperature, no humidity, no nuclear radiations, no acceleration ...) ? Cosmic rays ? Atoms decaying ?
      $endgroup$
      – Gabriel Devillers
      Apr 20 at 22:50




















    • $begingroup$
      That could be an explaination, but if this was the case, i'd expect a more intelligible form for the final user. Instead, it seems that datecodes got more and more cryptic in the years
      $endgroup$
      – valerio_new
      Apr 20 at 11:36






    • 5




      $begingroup$
      I'd think that is wishful thinking rather than a sensible argument against this explanation. Datecodes serve no user-readable purpose; they are for looking up. Full "human" dates simply don't fit.
      $endgroup$
      – Marcus Müller
      Apr 20 at 11:41






    • 3




      $begingroup$
      You can get these datecode tables from the manufacturers!
      $endgroup$
      – Marcus Müller
      Apr 20 at 11:58






    • 1




      $begingroup$
      I think the food analogy of shelf life is poor. Rather in food recalls the batch number is the significant detail. Making semiconductors requires a lot of sequential processes. One goof in one process could adversely effect the durability of a whole batch of transistors.
      $endgroup$
      – MaxW
      Apr 20 at 21:34






    • 2




      $begingroup$
      What kind of phenomena could cause a chip to degrade when stored on a shelf, if stored in appropriate conditions (good temperature, no humidity, no nuclear radiations, no acceleration ...) ? Cosmic rays ? Atoms decaying ?
      $endgroup$
      – Gabriel Devillers
      Apr 20 at 22:50


















    $begingroup$
    That could be an explaination, but if this was the case, i'd expect a more intelligible form for the final user. Instead, it seems that datecodes got more and more cryptic in the years
    $endgroup$
    – valerio_new
    Apr 20 at 11:36




    $begingroup$
    That could be an explaination, but if this was the case, i'd expect a more intelligible form for the final user. Instead, it seems that datecodes got more and more cryptic in the years
    $endgroup$
    – valerio_new
    Apr 20 at 11:36




    5




    5




    $begingroup$
    I'd think that is wishful thinking rather than a sensible argument against this explanation. Datecodes serve no user-readable purpose; they are for looking up. Full "human" dates simply don't fit.
    $endgroup$
    – Marcus Müller
    Apr 20 at 11:41




    $begingroup$
    I'd think that is wishful thinking rather than a sensible argument against this explanation. Datecodes serve no user-readable purpose; they are for looking up. Full "human" dates simply don't fit.
    $endgroup$
    – Marcus Müller
    Apr 20 at 11:41




    3




    3




    $begingroup$
    You can get these datecode tables from the manufacturers!
    $endgroup$
    – Marcus Müller
    Apr 20 at 11:58




    $begingroup$
    You can get these datecode tables from the manufacturers!
    $endgroup$
    – Marcus Müller
    Apr 20 at 11:58




    1




    1




    $begingroup$
    I think the food analogy of shelf life is poor. Rather in food recalls the batch number is the significant detail. Making semiconductors requires a lot of sequential processes. One goof in one process could adversely effect the durability of a whole batch of transistors.
    $endgroup$
    – MaxW
    Apr 20 at 21:34




    $begingroup$
    I think the food analogy of shelf life is poor. Rather in food recalls the batch number is the significant detail. Making semiconductors requires a lot of sequential processes. One goof in one process could adversely effect the durability of a whole batch of transistors.
    $endgroup$
    – MaxW
    Apr 20 at 21:34




    2




    2




    $begingroup$
    What kind of phenomena could cause a chip to degrade when stored on a shelf, if stored in appropriate conditions (good temperature, no humidity, no nuclear radiations, no acceleration ...) ? Cosmic rays ? Atoms decaying ?
    $endgroup$
    – Gabriel Devillers
    Apr 20 at 22:50






    $begingroup$
    What kind of phenomena could cause a chip to degrade when stored on a shelf, if stored in appropriate conditions (good temperature, no humidity, no nuclear radiations, no acceleration ...) ? Cosmic rays ? Atoms decaying ?
    $endgroup$
    – Gabriel Devillers
    Apr 20 at 22:50













    0












    $begingroup$

    Age failures can also be expected in ICs, especially the high density types, because of metal migration, causing defects






    share|improve this answer









    $endgroup$


















      0












      $begingroup$

      Age failures can also be expected in ICs, especially the high density types, because of metal migration, causing defects






      share|improve this answer









      $endgroup$
















        0












        0








        0





        $begingroup$

        Age failures can also be expected in ICs, especially the high density types, because of metal migration, causing defects






        share|improve this answer









        $endgroup$



        Age failures can also be expected in ICs, especially the high density types, because of metal migration, causing defects







        share|improve this answer












        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer










        answered Apr 22 at 5:38









        Vishy NathanVishy Nathan

        1




        1























            0












            $begingroup$

            The part code is completely irrelevant. The full part name is posted on the wheel or the tube as long the parts are on the shelf. The full name is in the PCB files as soon the part is used.



            What's not in the PCB files is the date code. That is because manufacturing PCBs is usually not done in the design house. Firms may have their own PCB production plant but it's serving several design houses in the company then. So this information, who got which date code of the part, is easily lost.



            That's why it's printed on the part prominently. You may trust your files but it's better to be able to look at the PCB in question and confirm your files are correct about that part before disassembling it.






            share|improve this answer









            $endgroup$













            • $begingroup$
              Very true. Once a PCB has passed functional testing all the parts are known to be the correct ones and repairs outside of authorised facilities are seldom given any priority. The datecode is still useful for debugging by in-house staff who have all the other documentation.
              $endgroup$
              – KalleMP
              Apr 22 at 11:36
















            0












            $begingroup$

            The part code is completely irrelevant. The full part name is posted on the wheel or the tube as long the parts are on the shelf. The full name is in the PCB files as soon the part is used.



            What's not in the PCB files is the date code. That is because manufacturing PCBs is usually not done in the design house. Firms may have their own PCB production plant but it's serving several design houses in the company then. So this information, who got which date code of the part, is easily lost.



            That's why it's printed on the part prominently. You may trust your files but it's better to be able to look at the PCB in question and confirm your files are correct about that part before disassembling it.






            share|improve this answer









            $endgroup$













            • $begingroup$
              Very true. Once a PCB has passed functional testing all the parts are known to be the correct ones and repairs outside of authorised facilities are seldom given any priority. The datecode is still useful for debugging by in-house staff who have all the other documentation.
              $endgroup$
              – KalleMP
              Apr 22 at 11:36














            0












            0








            0





            $begingroup$

            The part code is completely irrelevant. The full part name is posted on the wheel or the tube as long the parts are on the shelf. The full name is in the PCB files as soon the part is used.



            What's not in the PCB files is the date code. That is because manufacturing PCBs is usually not done in the design house. Firms may have their own PCB production plant but it's serving several design houses in the company then. So this information, who got which date code of the part, is easily lost.



            That's why it's printed on the part prominently. You may trust your files but it's better to be able to look at the PCB in question and confirm your files are correct about that part before disassembling it.






            share|improve this answer









            $endgroup$



            The part code is completely irrelevant. The full part name is posted on the wheel or the tube as long the parts are on the shelf. The full name is in the PCB files as soon the part is used.



            What's not in the PCB files is the date code. That is because manufacturing PCBs is usually not done in the design house. Firms may have their own PCB production plant but it's serving several design houses in the company then. So this information, who got which date code of the part, is easily lost.



            That's why it's printed on the part prominently. You may trust your files but it's better to be able to look at the PCB in question and confirm your files are correct about that part before disassembling it.







            share|improve this answer












            share|improve this answer



            share|improve this answer










            answered Apr 22 at 5:52









            JankaJanka

            9,1201922




            9,1201922












            • $begingroup$
              Very true. Once a PCB has passed functional testing all the parts are known to be the correct ones and repairs outside of authorised facilities are seldom given any priority. The datecode is still useful for debugging by in-house staff who have all the other documentation.
              $endgroup$
              – KalleMP
              Apr 22 at 11:36


















            • $begingroup$
              Very true. Once a PCB has passed functional testing all the parts are known to be the correct ones and repairs outside of authorised facilities are seldom given any priority. The datecode is still useful for debugging by in-house staff who have all the other documentation.
              $endgroup$
              – KalleMP
              Apr 22 at 11:36
















            $begingroup$
            Very true. Once a PCB has passed functional testing all the parts are known to be the correct ones and repairs outside of authorised facilities are seldom given any priority. The datecode is still useful for debugging by in-house staff who have all the other documentation.
            $endgroup$
            – KalleMP
            Apr 22 at 11:36




            $begingroup$
            Very true. Once a PCB has passed functional testing all the parts are known to be the correct ones and repairs outside of authorised facilities are seldom given any priority. The datecode is still useful for debugging by in-house staff who have all the other documentation.
            $endgroup$
            – KalleMP
            Apr 22 at 11:36


















            draft saved

            draft discarded




















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Electrical Engineering Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2felectronics.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f433581%2fwhy-datecode-is-so-important-to-chip-manufacturers%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Færeyskur hestur Heimild | Tengill | Tilvísanir | LeiðsagnarvalRossið - síða um færeyska hrossið á færeyskuGott ár hjá færeyska hestinum

            He _____ here since 1970 . Answer needed [closed]What does “since he was so high” mean?Meaning of “catch birds for”?How do I ensure “since” takes the meaning I want?“Who cares here” meaningWhat does “right round toward” mean?the time tense (had now been detected)What does the phrase “ring around the roses” mean here?Correct usage of “visited upon”Meaning of “foiled rail sabotage bid”It was the third time I had gone to Rome or It is the third time I had been to Rome

            Slayer Innehåll Historia | Stil, komposition och lyrik | Bandets betydelse och framgångar | Sidoprojekt och samarbeten | Kontroverser | Medlemmar | Utmärkelser och nomineringar | Turnéer och festivaler | Diskografi | Referenser | Externa länkar | Navigeringsmenywww.slayer.net”Metal Massacre vol. 1””Metal Massacre vol. 3””Metal Massacre Volume III””Show No Mercy””Haunting the Chapel””Live Undead””Hell Awaits””Reign in Blood””Reign in Blood””Gold & Platinum – Reign in Blood””Golden Gods Awards Winners”originalet”Kerrang! Hall Of Fame””Slayer Looks Back On 37-Year Career In New Video Series: Part Two””South of Heaven””Gold & Platinum – South of Heaven””Seasons in the Abyss””Gold & Platinum - Seasons in the Abyss””Divine Intervention””Divine Intervention - Release group by Slayer””Gold & Platinum - Divine Intervention””Live Intrusion””Undisputed Attitude””Abolish Government/Superficial Love””Release “Slatanic Slaughter: A Tribute to Slayer” by Various Artists””Diabolus in Musica””Soundtrack to the Apocalypse””God Hates Us All””Systematic - Relationships””War at the Warfield””Gold & Platinum - War at the Warfield””Soundtrack to the Apocalypse””Gold & Platinum - Still Reigning””Metallica, Slayer, Iron Mauden Among Winners At Metal Hammer Awards””Eternal Pyre””Eternal Pyre - Slayer release group””Eternal Pyre””Metal Storm Awards 2006””Kerrang! Hall Of Fame””Slayer Wins 'Best Metal' Grammy Award””Slayer Guitarist Jeff Hanneman Dies””Bullet-For My Valentine booed at Metal Hammer Golden Gods Awards””Unholy Aliance””The End Of Slayer?””Slayer: We Could Thrash Out Two More Albums If We're Fast Enough...””'The Unholy Alliance: Chapter III' UK Dates Added”originalet”Megadeth And Slayer To Co-Headline 'Canadian Carnage' Trek”originalet”World Painted Blood””Release “World Painted Blood” by Slayer””Metallica Heading To Cinemas””Slayer, Megadeth To Join Forces For 'European Carnage' Tour - Dec. 18, 2010”originalet”Slayer's Hanneman Contracts Acute Infection; Band To Bring In Guest Guitarist””Cannibal Corpse's Pat O'Brien Will Step In As Slayer's Guest Guitarist”originalet”Slayer’s Jeff Hanneman Dead at 49””Dave Lombardo Says He Made Only $67,000 In 2011 While Touring With Slayer””Slayer: We Do Not Agree With Dave Lombardo's Substance Or Timeline Of Events””Slayer Welcomes Drummer Paul Bostaph Back To The Fold””Slayer Hope to Unveil Never-Before-Heard Jeff Hanneman Material on Next Album””Slayer Debut New Song 'Implode' During Surprise Golden Gods Appearance””Release group Repentless by Slayer””Repentless - Slayer - Credits””Slayer””Metal Storm Awards 2015””Slayer - to release comic book "Repentless #1"””Slayer To Release 'Repentless' 6.66" Vinyl Box Set””BREAKING NEWS: Slayer Announce Farewell Tour””Slayer Recruit Lamb of God, Anthrax, Behemoth + Testament for Final Tour””Slayer lägger ner efter 37 år””Slayer Announces Second North American Leg Of 'Final' Tour””Final World Tour””Slayer Announces Final European Tour With Lamb of God, Anthrax And Obituary””Slayer To Tour Europe With Lamb of God, Anthrax And Obituary””Slayer To Play 'Last French Show Ever' At Next Year's Hellfst””Slayer's Final World Tour Will Extend Into 2019””Death Angel's Rob Cavestany On Slayer's 'Farewell' Tour: 'Some Of Us Could See This Coming'””Testament Has No Plans To Retire Anytime Soon, Says Chuck Billy””Anthrax's Scott Ian On Slayer's 'Farewell' Tour Plans: 'I Was Surprised And I Wasn't Surprised'””Slayer””Slayer's Morbid Schlock””Review/Rock; For Slayer, the Mania Is the Message””Slayer - Biography””Slayer - Reign In Blood”originalet”Dave Lombardo””An exclusive oral history of Slayer”originalet”Exclusive! Interview With Slayer Guitarist Jeff Hanneman”originalet”Thinking Out Loud: Slayer's Kerry King on hair metal, Satan and being polite””Slayer Lyrics””Slayer - Biography””Most influential artists for extreme metal music””Slayer - Reign in Blood””Slayer guitarist Jeff Hanneman dies aged 49””Slatanic Slaughter: A Tribute to Slayer””Gateway to Hell: A Tribute to Slayer””Covered In Blood””Slayer: The Origins of Thrash in San Francisco, CA.””Why They Rule - #6 Slayer”originalet”Guitar World's 100 Greatest Heavy Metal Guitarists Of All Time”originalet”The fans have spoken: Slayer comes out on top in readers' polls”originalet”Tribute to Jeff Hanneman (1964-2013)””Lamb Of God Frontman: We Sound Like A Slayer Rip-Off””BEHEMOTH Frontman Pays Tribute To SLAYER's JEFF HANNEMAN””Slayer, Hatebreed Doing Double Duty On This Year's Ozzfest””System of a Down””Lacuna Coil’s Andrea Ferro Talks Influences, Skateboarding, Band Origins + More””Slayer - Reign in Blood””Into The Lungs of Hell””Slayer rules - en utställning om fans””Slayer and Their Fans Slashed Through a No-Holds-Barred Night at Gas Monkey””Home””Slayer””Gold & Platinum - The Big 4 Live from Sofia, Bulgaria””Exclusive! Interview With Slayer Guitarist Kerry King””2008-02-23: Wiltern, Los Angeles, CA, USA””Slayer's Kerry King To Perform With Megadeth Tonight! - Oct. 21, 2010”originalet”Dave Lombardo - Biography”Slayer Case DismissedArkiveradUltimate Classic Rock: Slayer guitarist Jeff Hanneman dead at 49.”Slayer: "We could never do any thing like Some Kind Of Monster..."””Cannibal Corpse'S Pat O'Brien Will Step In As Slayer'S Guest Guitarist | The Official Slayer Site”originalet”Slayer Wins 'Best Metal' Grammy Award””Slayer Guitarist Jeff Hanneman Dies””Kerrang! Awards 2006 Blog: Kerrang! Hall Of Fame””Kerrang! Awards 2013: Kerrang! Legend”originalet”Metallica, Slayer, Iron Maien Among Winners At Metal Hammer Awards””Metal Hammer Golden Gods Awards””Bullet For My Valentine Booed At Metal Hammer Golden Gods Awards””Metal Storm Awards 2006””Metal Storm Awards 2015””Slayer's Concert History””Slayer - Relationships””Slayer - Releases”Slayers officiella webbplatsSlayer på MusicBrainzOfficiell webbplatsSlayerSlayerr1373445760000 0001 1540 47353068615-5086262726cb13906545x(data)6033143kn20030215029