Meaning of “beneath the dignity of the office”?





.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty{
margin-bottom:0;
}








1

















Last year CNN issued a statement saying Trump was "beneath the dignity of the office" because he was attacking a CNN anchor in a spoof video.



What exactly does "beneath the dignity of the office" means? Does it mean Trump's behaviour bring shame and lose people's respect on the US government?










share|improve this question






















  • 2





    Yes. The statement assumes that the office of president of the United States is one which should be treated with respect by others as well as by the incumbent. They are saying that making personal and public attacks upon a journalist is not considered in keeping with the role of primary statesman.

    – S Conroy
    Sep 10 '18 at 18:25






  • 1





    Can you add some details on the research you've done to understand this phrase, and why it didn't answer your quesiton?

    – Azor Ahai
    Sep 10 '18 at 18:34


















1

















Last year CNN issued a statement saying Trump was "beneath the dignity of the office" because he was attacking a CNN anchor in a spoof video.



What exactly does "beneath the dignity of the office" means? Does it mean Trump's behaviour bring shame and lose people's respect on the US government?










share|improve this question






















  • 2





    Yes. The statement assumes that the office of president of the United States is one which should be treated with respect by others as well as by the incumbent. They are saying that making personal and public attacks upon a journalist is not considered in keeping with the role of primary statesman.

    – S Conroy
    Sep 10 '18 at 18:25






  • 1





    Can you add some details on the research you've done to understand this phrase, and why it didn't answer your quesiton?

    – Azor Ahai
    Sep 10 '18 at 18:34














1












1








1








Last year CNN issued a statement saying Trump was "beneath the dignity of the office" because he was attacking a CNN anchor in a spoof video.



What exactly does "beneath the dignity of the office" means? Does it mean Trump's behaviour bring shame and lose people's respect on the US government?










share|improve this question















Last year CNN issued a statement saying Trump was "beneath the dignity of the office" because he was attacking a CNN anchor in a spoof video.



What exactly does "beneath the dignity of the office" means? Does it mean Trump's behaviour bring shame and lose people's respect on the US government?







meaning expressions meaning-in-context phrase-meaning






share|improve this question














share|improve this question











share|improve this question




share|improve this question










asked Sep 10 '18 at 18:14









dottydotty

83 bronze badges




83 bronze badges











  • 2





    Yes. The statement assumes that the office of president of the United States is one which should be treated with respect by others as well as by the incumbent. They are saying that making personal and public attacks upon a journalist is not considered in keeping with the role of primary statesman.

    – S Conroy
    Sep 10 '18 at 18:25






  • 1





    Can you add some details on the research you've done to understand this phrase, and why it didn't answer your quesiton?

    – Azor Ahai
    Sep 10 '18 at 18:34














  • 2





    Yes. The statement assumes that the office of president of the United States is one which should be treated with respect by others as well as by the incumbent. They are saying that making personal and public attacks upon a journalist is not considered in keeping with the role of primary statesman.

    – S Conroy
    Sep 10 '18 at 18:25






  • 1





    Can you add some details on the research you've done to understand this phrase, and why it didn't answer your quesiton?

    – Azor Ahai
    Sep 10 '18 at 18:34








2




2





Yes. The statement assumes that the office of president of the United States is one which should be treated with respect by others as well as by the incumbent. They are saying that making personal and public attacks upon a journalist is not considered in keeping with the role of primary statesman.

– S Conroy
Sep 10 '18 at 18:25





Yes. The statement assumes that the office of president of the United States is one which should be treated with respect by others as well as by the incumbent. They are saying that making personal and public attacks upon a journalist is not considered in keeping with the role of primary statesman.

– S Conroy
Sep 10 '18 at 18:25




1




1





Can you add some details on the research you've done to understand this phrase, and why it didn't answer your quesiton?

– Azor Ahai
Sep 10 '18 at 18:34





Can you add some details on the research you've done to understand this phrase, and why it didn't answer your quesiton?

– Azor Ahai
Sep 10 '18 at 18:34










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















1


















To be literal, high is an adjective used of people, institutions and qualities that are worthy of respect, honour and admiration.



Conversely, we use “low” when the opposite of these things are merited: contempt, shame and disgust (or something like these).



The presidency is among the highest offices in the USA - arguably the highest,



Accordingly, the conduct of the holder of that office is expected to show the qualities that match that office (I decline to specify what they are, to keep out of politics.



If, Instead, a president should conduct him or herself in a manner that was (say) dishonourable or dishonest, his or her conduct could be said to fall below the high standard expected of a person holding high office.



The preposition merely continues the metaphor. As to the office holder named in the question, I could not possibly comment,






share|improve this answer



























  • Thank you so much for your answer! it was clear and easy to understand.

    – dotty
    Sep 11 '18 at 8:12











  • @dotty You are welcome. Did you know you can do a ‘tick’ to accept the answer as the one you want? No idea how, but it is part of a system to rank order answers so that the ‘best’ is read first.

    – Tuffy
    Sep 11 '18 at 8:17



















2


















We expect a general level of civility/decorum/honor in a position as important as the president, as they're our representative to the world. In addition, in general Christianity, 'good' is associated with 'up' (towards heaven), and 'bad' is associated with 'down' (towards hell). So to say that someone is 'beneath the dignity of the office/position' is to say the person's moral qualities aren't quite to the standard we expect from our elected leaders.






share|improve this answer



























  • I didn't know direction is associated with quality. Thank you so much!

    – dotty
    Sep 11 '18 at 8:09






  • 1





    " Behold, the Underminer! I'm always beneath you, but nothing is beneath me!" the pun is that the evil villain Underminer lives underground literally beneath everybody, but 'nothing is beneath him' is a common statement that 'he' would do anything as 'low' as possible, lower than anybody else.

    – Mitch
    May 28 at 21:44













Your Answer








StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "97"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/"u003ecc by-sa 4.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});















draft saved

draft discarded
















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fenglish.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f463836%2fmeaning-of-beneath-the-dignity-of-the-office%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown


























2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes








2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









1


















To be literal, high is an adjective used of people, institutions and qualities that are worthy of respect, honour and admiration.



Conversely, we use “low” when the opposite of these things are merited: contempt, shame and disgust (or something like these).



The presidency is among the highest offices in the USA - arguably the highest,



Accordingly, the conduct of the holder of that office is expected to show the qualities that match that office (I decline to specify what they are, to keep out of politics.



If, Instead, a president should conduct him or herself in a manner that was (say) dishonourable or dishonest, his or her conduct could be said to fall below the high standard expected of a person holding high office.



The preposition merely continues the metaphor. As to the office holder named in the question, I could not possibly comment,






share|improve this answer



























  • Thank you so much for your answer! it was clear and easy to understand.

    – dotty
    Sep 11 '18 at 8:12











  • @dotty You are welcome. Did you know you can do a ‘tick’ to accept the answer as the one you want? No idea how, but it is part of a system to rank order answers so that the ‘best’ is read first.

    – Tuffy
    Sep 11 '18 at 8:17
















1


















To be literal, high is an adjective used of people, institutions and qualities that are worthy of respect, honour and admiration.



Conversely, we use “low” when the opposite of these things are merited: contempt, shame and disgust (or something like these).



The presidency is among the highest offices in the USA - arguably the highest,



Accordingly, the conduct of the holder of that office is expected to show the qualities that match that office (I decline to specify what they are, to keep out of politics.



If, Instead, a president should conduct him or herself in a manner that was (say) dishonourable or dishonest, his or her conduct could be said to fall below the high standard expected of a person holding high office.



The preposition merely continues the metaphor. As to the office holder named in the question, I could not possibly comment,






share|improve this answer



























  • Thank you so much for your answer! it was clear and easy to understand.

    – dotty
    Sep 11 '18 at 8:12











  • @dotty You are welcome. Did you know you can do a ‘tick’ to accept the answer as the one you want? No idea how, but it is part of a system to rank order answers so that the ‘best’ is read first.

    – Tuffy
    Sep 11 '18 at 8:17














1














1










1









To be literal, high is an adjective used of people, institutions and qualities that are worthy of respect, honour and admiration.



Conversely, we use “low” when the opposite of these things are merited: contempt, shame and disgust (or something like these).



The presidency is among the highest offices in the USA - arguably the highest,



Accordingly, the conduct of the holder of that office is expected to show the qualities that match that office (I decline to specify what they are, to keep out of politics.



If, Instead, a president should conduct him or herself in a manner that was (say) dishonourable or dishonest, his or her conduct could be said to fall below the high standard expected of a person holding high office.



The preposition merely continues the metaphor. As to the office holder named in the question, I could not possibly comment,






share|improve this answer














To be literal, high is an adjective used of people, institutions and qualities that are worthy of respect, honour and admiration.



Conversely, we use “low” when the opposite of these things are merited: contempt, shame and disgust (or something like these).



The presidency is among the highest offices in the USA - arguably the highest,



Accordingly, the conduct of the holder of that office is expected to show the qualities that match that office (I decline to specify what they are, to keep out of politics.



If, Instead, a president should conduct him or herself in a manner that was (say) dishonourable or dishonest, his or her conduct could be said to fall below the high standard expected of a person holding high office.



The preposition merely continues the metaphor. As to the office holder named in the question, I could not possibly comment,







share|improve this answer













share|improve this answer




share|improve this answer










answered Sep 11 '18 at 0:37









TuffyTuffy

5,4061 gold badge7 silver badges25 bronze badges




5,4061 gold badge7 silver badges25 bronze badges
















  • Thank you so much for your answer! it was clear and easy to understand.

    – dotty
    Sep 11 '18 at 8:12











  • @dotty You are welcome. Did you know you can do a ‘tick’ to accept the answer as the one you want? No idea how, but it is part of a system to rank order answers so that the ‘best’ is read first.

    – Tuffy
    Sep 11 '18 at 8:17



















  • Thank you so much for your answer! it was clear and easy to understand.

    – dotty
    Sep 11 '18 at 8:12











  • @dotty You are welcome. Did you know you can do a ‘tick’ to accept the answer as the one you want? No idea how, but it is part of a system to rank order answers so that the ‘best’ is read first.

    – Tuffy
    Sep 11 '18 at 8:17

















Thank you so much for your answer! it was clear and easy to understand.

– dotty
Sep 11 '18 at 8:12





Thank you so much for your answer! it was clear and easy to understand.

– dotty
Sep 11 '18 at 8:12













@dotty You are welcome. Did you know you can do a ‘tick’ to accept the answer as the one you want? No idea how, but it is part of a system to rank order answers so that the ‘best’ is read first.

– Tuffy
Sep 11 '18 at 8:17





@dotty You are welcome. Did you know you can do a ‘tick’ to accept the answer as the one you want? No idea how, but it is part of a system to rank order answers so that the ‘best’ is read first.

– Tuffy
Sep 11 '18 at 8:17













2


















We expect a general level of civility/decorum/honor in a position as important as the president, as they're our representative to the world. In addition, in general Christianity, 'good' is associated with 'up' (towards heaven), and 'bad' is associated with 'down' (towards hell). So to say that someone is 'beneath the dignity of the office/position' is to say the person's moral qualities aren't quite to the standard we expect from our elected leaders.






share|improve this answer



























  • I didn't know direction is associated with quality. Thank you so much!

    – dotty
    Sep 11 '18 at 8:09






  • 1





    " Behold, the Underminer! I'm always beneath you, but nothing is beneath me!" the pun is that the evil villain Underminer lives underground literally beneath everybody, but 'nothing is beneath him' is a common statement that 'he' would do anything as 'low' as possible, lower than anybody else.

    – Mitch
    May 28 at 21:44
















2


















We expect a general level of civility/decorum/honor in a position as important as the president, as they're our representative to the world. In addition, in general Christianity, 'good' is associated with 'up' (towards heaven), and 'bad' is associated with 'down' (towards hell). So to say that someone is 'beneath the dignity of the office/position' is to say the person's moral qualities aren't quite to the standard we expect from our elected leaders.






share|improve this answer



























  • I didn't know direction is associated with quality. Thank you so much!

    – dotty
    Sep 11 '18 at 8:09






  • 1





    " Behold, the Underminer! I'm always beneath you, but nothing is beneath me!" the pun is that the evil villain Underminer lives underground literally beneath everybody, but 'nothing is beneath him' is a common statement that 'he' would do anything as 'low' as possible, lower than anybody else.

    – Mitch
    May 28 at 21:44














2














2










2









We expect a general level of civility/decorum/honor in a position as important as the president, as they're our representative to the world. In addition, in general Christianity, 'good' is associated with 'up' (towards heaven), and 'bad' is associated with 'down' (towards hell). So to say that someone is 'beneath the dignity of the office/position' is to say the person's moral qualities aren't quite to the standard we expect from our elected leaders.






share|improve this answer














We expect a general level of civility/decorum/honor in a position as important as the president, as they're our representative to the world. In addition, in general Christianity, 'good' is associated with 'up' (towards heaven), and 'bad' is associated with 'down' (towards hell). So to say that someone is 'beneath the dignity of the office/position' is to say the person's moral qualities aren't quite to the standard we expect from our elected leaders.







share|improve this answer













share|improve this answer




share|improve this answer










answered Sep 10 '18 at 20:27









CarduusCarduus

5931 silver badge6 bronze badges




5931 silver badge6 bronze badges
















  • I didn't know direction is associated with quality. Thank you so much!

    – dotty
    Sep 11 '18 at 8:09






  • 1





    " Behold, the Underminer! I'm always beneath you, but nothing is beneath me!" the pun is that the evil villain Underminer lives underground literally beneath everybody, but 'nothing is beneath him' is a common statement that 'he' would do anything as 'low' as possible, lower than anybody else.

    – Mitch
    May 28 at 21:44



















  • I didn't know direction is associated with quality. Thank you so much!

    – dotty
    Sep 11 '18 at 8:09






  • 1





    " Behold, the Underminer! I'm always beneath you, but nothing is beneath me!" the pun is that the evil villain Underminer lives underground literally beneath everybody, but 'nothing is beneath him' is a common statement that 'he' would do anything as 'low' as possible, lower than anybody else.

    – Mitch
    May 28 at 21:44

















I didn't know direction is associated with quality. Thank you so much!

– dotty
Sep 11 '18 at 8:09





I didn't know direction is associated with quality. Thank you so much!

– dotty
Sep 11 '18 at 8:09




1




1





" Behold, the Underminer! I'm always beneath you, but nothing is beneath me!" the pun is that the evil villain Underminer lives underground literally beneath everybody, but 'nothing is beneath him' is a common statement that 'he' would do anything as 'low' as possible, lower than anybody else.

– Mitch
May 28 at 21:44





" Behold, the Underminer! I'm always beneath you, but nothing is beneath me!" the pun is that the evil villain Underminer lives underground literally beneath everybody, but 'nothing is beneath him' is a common statement that 'he' would do anything as 'low' as possible, lower than anybody else.

– Mitch
May 28 at 21:44



















draft saved

draft discarded



















































Thanks for contributing an answer to English Language & Usage Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fenglish.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f463836%2fmeaning-of-beneath-the-dignity-of-the-office%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown









Popular posts from this blog

He _____ here since 1970 . Answer needed [closed]What does “since he was so high” mean?Meaning of “catch birds for”?How do I ensure “since” takes the meaning I want?“Who cares here” meaningWhat does “right round toward” mean?the time tense (had now been detected)What does the phrase “ring around the roses” mean here?Correct usage of “visited upon”Meaning of “foiled rail sabotage bid”It was the third time I had gone to Rome or It is the third time I had been to Rome

Bunad

Færeyskur hestur Heimild | Tengill | Tilvísanir | LeiðsagnarvalRossið - síða um færeyska hrossið á færeyskuGott ár hjá færeyska hestinum