How to find the largest number(s) in a list of elements, possibly non-unique?How do I check if a list is empty?Finding the index of an item given a list containing it in PythonWhat's the simplest way to print a Java array?Convert bytes to a string?Getting the last element of a list in PythonHow to make a flat list out of list of lists?How do I get the number of elements in a list in Python?How do I list all files of a directory?Use of *args and **kwargsHow do I remove a particular element from an array in JavaScript?

Does an advisor owe his/her student anything? Will an advisor keep a PhD student only out of pity?

Dark corner in image using Sigma 85mm F1.4 EX DG HSM

Hash table solution to twoSum

Doesn't the system of the Supreme Court oppose justice?

Are these expressions not equal? Mathematica output is ambiguous

Can I say "fingers" when referring to toes?

Can I cause damage to electrical appliances by unplugging them when they are turned on?

Why do ¬, ∀ and ∃ have the same precedence?

Birthday Problem Paraphrased

How to align my equation to left?

Mimic lecturing on blackboard, facing audience

Why is short-wave infrared portion of electromagnetic spectrum so sensitive to fire?

Does Doodling or Improvising on the Piano Have Any Benefits?

"It doesn't matter" or "it won't matter"?

xxx we would have made had we used xxx, what is had used for?

The IT department bottlenecks progress, how should I handle this?

What kind of floor tile is this?

How do I fix the group tension caused by my character stealing and possibly killing without provocation?

Multiplicative persistence

Does the reader need to like the PoV character?

Why do Radio Buttons not fill the entire outer circle?

What if a revenant (monster) gains fire resistance?

Which was the first story featuring espers?

Open a doc from terminal, but not by its name



How to find the largest number(s) in a list of elements, possibly non-unique?


How do I check if a list is empty?Finding the index of an item given a list containing it in PythonWhat's the simplest way to print a Java array?Convert bytes to a string?Getting the last element of a list in PythonHow to make a flat list out of list of lists?How do I get the number of elements in a list in Python?How do I list all files of a directory?Use of *args and **kwargsHow do I remove a particular element from an array in JavaScript?













16















Here is my program,



item_no = []
max = 0
for i in range(5):
input_no = int(input("Enter an item number: "))
item_no.append(input_no)
for i in item_no:
if i > max:
max = i
high = item_no.index(max)
print (item_no[high])


Example input: [5, 6, 7, 8, 8]



Example output: 8



How can I change my program to output the same highest numbers in an array?



Expected output: [8, 8]










share|improve this question









New contributor




user11206537 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.















  • 3





    Band indent at line 8

    – DirtyBit
    Mar 18 at 7:21






  • 1





    You can use Dictionary to store the maximum number and its count as item_no = , if you max is different then original in item_no, reinitialize it and add that item and add count =1

    – dkb
    Mar 18 at 7:21







  • 3





    ("Band" probably is a misspelling for "Bad")

    – tripleee
    Mar 18 at 7:26






  • 1





    @tripleee Indeed. bulls-eye!

    – DirtyBit
    Mar 18 at 7:39






  • 1





    As answers show, it's more Pythonic to do it with list comprehensions, rather than loops. But if you use loops to iterate over the list, a style tip: don't use the same variable name i both for indices i in range(5) then also for items/values: for i in item_no. Better to do for no in item_no

    – smci
    Mar 19 at 0:35
















16















Here is my program,



item_no = []
max = 0
for i in range(5):
input_no = int(input("Enter an item number: "))
item_no.append(input_no)
for i in item_no:
if i > max:
max = i
high = item_no.index(max)
print (item_no[high])


Example input: [5, 6, 7, 8, 8]



Example output: 8



How can I change my program to output the same highest numbers in an array?



Expected output: [8, 8]










share|improve this question









New contributor




user11206537 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.















  • 3





    Band indent at line 8

    – DirtyBit
    Mar 18 at 7:21






  • 1





    You can use Dictionary to store the maximum number and its count as item_no = , if you max is different then original in item_no, reinitialize it and add that item and add count =1

    – dkb
    Mar 18 at 7:21







  • 3





    ("Band" probably is a misspelling for "Bad")

    – tripleee
    Mar 18 at 7:26






  • 1





    @tripleee Indeed. bulls-eye!

    – DirtyBit
    Mar 18 at 7:39






  • 1





    As answers show, it's more Pythonic to do it with list comprehensions, rather than loops. But if you use loops to iterate over the list, a style tip: don't use the same variable name i both for indices i in range(5) then also for items/values: for i in item_no. Better to do for no in item_no

    – smci
    Mar 19 at 0:35














16












16








16


4






Here is my program,



item_no = []
max = 0
for i in range(5):
input_no = int(input("Enter an item number: "))
item_no.append(input_no)
for i in item_no:
if i > max:
max = i
high = item_no.index(max)
print (item_no[high])


Example input: [5, 6, 7, 8, 8]



Example output: 8



How can I change my program to output the same highest numbers in an array?



Expected output: [8, 8]










share|improve this question









New contributor




user11206537 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.












Here is my program,



item_no = []
max = 0
for i in range(5):
input_no = int(input("Enter an item number: "))
item_no.append(input_no)
for i in item_no:
if i > max:
max = i
high = item_no.index(max)
print (item_no[high])


Example input: [5, 6, 7, 8, 8]



Example output: 8



How can I change my program to output the same highest numbers in an array?



Expected output: [8, 8]







python arrays python-3.x






share|improve this question









New contributor




user11206537 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











share|improve this question









New contributor




user11206537 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited Mar 19 at 0:38









smci

15.4k678109




15.4k678109






New contributor




user11206537 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









asked Mar 18 at 7:19









user11206537user11206537

91112




91112




New contributor




user11206537 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.





New contributor





user11206537 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






user11206537 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.







  • 3





    Band indent at line 8

    – DirtyBit
    Mar 18 at 7:21






  • 1





    You can use Dictionary to store the maximum number and its count as item_no = , if you max is different then original in item_no, reinitialize it and add that item and add count =1

    – dkb
    Mar 18 at 7:21







  • 3





    ("Band" probably is a misspelling for "Bad")

    – tripleee
    Mar 18 at 7:26






  • 1





    @tripleee Indeed. bulls-eye!

    – DirtyBit
    Mar 18 at 7:39






  • 1





    As answers show, it's more Pythonic to do it with list comprehensions, rather than loops. But if you use loops to iterate over the list, a style tip: don't use the same variable name i both for indices i in range(5) then also for items/values: for i in item_no. Better to do for no in item_no

    – smci
    Mar 19 at 0:35













  • 3





    Band indent at line 8

    – DirtyBit
    Mar 18 at 7:21






  • 1





    You can use Dictionary to store the maximum number and its count as item_no = , if you max is different then original in item_no, reinitialize it and add that item and add count =1

    – dkb
    Mar 18 at 7:21







  • 3





    ("Band" probably is a misspelling for "Bad")

    – tripleee
    Mar 18 at 7:26






  • 1





    @tripleee Indeed. bulls-eye!

    – DirtyBit
    Mar 18 at 7:39






  • 1





    As answers show, it's more Pythonic to do it with list comprehensions, rather than loops. But if you use loops to iterate over the list, a style tip: don't use the same variable name i both for indices i in range(5) then also for items/values: for i in item_no. Better to do for no in item_no

    – smci
    Mar 19 at 0:35








3




3





Band indent at line 8

– DirtyBit
Mar 18 at 7:21





Band indent at line 8

– DirtyBit
Mar 18 at 7:21




1




1





You can use Dictionary to store the maximum number and its count as item_no = , if you max is different then original in item_no, reinitialize it and add that item and add count =1

– dkb
Mar 18 at 7:21






You can use Dictionary to store the maximum number and its count as item_no = , if you max is different then original in item_no, reinitialize it and add that item and add count =1

– dkb
Mar 18 at 7:21





3




3





("Band" probably is a misspelling for "Bad")

– tripleee
Mar 18 at 7:26





("Band" probably is a misspelling for "Bad")

– tripleee
Mar 18 at 7:26




1




1





@tripleee Indeed. bulls-eye!

– DirtyBit
Mar 18 at 7:39





@tripleee Indeed. bulls-eye!

– DirtyBit
Mar 18 at 7:39




1




1





As answers show, it's more Pythonic to do it with list comprehensions, rather than loops. But if you use loops to iterate over the list, a style tip: don't use the same variable name i both for indices i in range(5) then also for items/values: for i in item_no. Better to do for no in item_no

– smci
Mar 19 at 0:35






As answers show, it's more Pythonic to do it with list comprehensions, rather than loops. But if you use loops to iterate over the list, a style tip: don't use the same variable name i both for indices i in range(5) then also for items/values: for i in item_no. Better to do for no in item_no

– smci
Mar 19 at 0:35













6 Answers
6






active

oldest

votes


















27














Just get the maximum using max and then its count and combine the two in a list-comprehension.



item_no = [5, 6, 7, 8, 8]

max_no = max(item_no)
highest = [max_no for _ in range(item_no.count(max_no))]
print(highest) # -> [8, 8]


Note that this will return a list of a single item in case your maximum value appears only once.




A solution closer to your current programming style would be the following:



item_no = [5, 6, 7, 8, 8]
max_no = 0 # Note 1
for i in item_no:
if i > max_no:
max_no = i
high = [i]
elif i == max_no:
high.append(i)


with the same results as above of course.



Notes



  1. I am assuming that you are dealing with N* (1, 2, ...) numbers only. If that is not the case, initializing with -math.inf should be used instead.


Note that the second code snippet is less efficient than the first by quite a margin. Python allows you to be more efficient than these explicit, fortran-like loops and it is more efficient itself when you use it properly.






share|improve this answer

























  • Actually, I would love to use the first code, but since this part of my school project, I am not allowed to use inbuilt functions, therefore I need to use the second code.

    – user11206537
    Mar 18 at 7:42






  • 2





    @user11206537 I kinda saw this coming. Knowing what a better way would be is still of some value. Have fun!

    – Ev. Kounis
    Mar 18 at 7:44











  • One last question, how do you find the index of the result (high) in item_no?

    – user11206537
    Mar 18 at 8:32







  • 3





    @user11206537 To get the index as well, you can modify the code slightly and use enumerate on item_no. As you loop through, store the index in a 2nd list as you do for the max. Take a look at this

    – Ev. Kounis
    Mar 18 at 9:32






  • 1





    @Drew Yes, you're right; if item_no[0] == 0, the code crashes as high isn't defined when reaching high.append(i).

    – PiCTo
    Mar 19 at 0:03


















15














You can do it even shorter:



item_no = [5, 6, 7, 8, 8]
#compute once - use many
max_item = max(item_no)
print(item_no.count(max_item) * [max_item])


output:



[8, 8]





share|improve this answer

























  • One last question, how do you find the index of the result in item_no?

    – user11206537
    Mar 18 at 8:48



















4














You could use list comprehension for that task following way:



numbers = [5, 6, 7, 8, 8]
maxnumbers = [i for i in numbers if i==max(numbers)]
print(*maxnumbers,sep=',')


output:



8,8


* operator in print is used to unpack values, sep is used to inform print what seperator to use: , in this case.



EDIT: If you want to get indices of biggest value and call max only once then do:



numbers = [5, 6, 7, 8, 8]
biggest = max(numbers)
positions = [inx for inx,i in enumerate(numbers) if i==biggest]
print(*positions,sep=',')


Output:



3,4


As you might check numbers[3] is equal to biggest and numbers[4] is equal to biggest.






share|improve this answer




















  • 4





    note that your solution calls max a total of len(numbers) times. Storing it outside the list and then using that would be better.

    – Ev. Kounis
    Mar 18 at 7:31












  • How do you find the index of the result in item_no?

    – user11206537
    Mar 18 at 9:01











  • @Ev.Kounis I assume the Python interpreter optimizes this, no?

    – user1717828
    Mar 18 at 16:38











  • @user1717828 No it does not.

    – Ev. Kounis
    Mar 19 at 7:04











  • @Ev.Kounis, Oh man, I didn't believe this so I tested it out. python -m timeit "numbers = [5, 6, 7, 8, 8]; max_number = max(numbers); maxnumbers = [i for i in numbers if i==max_number]" is twice as fast as when the max calculation is in the comprehension. I've gotten very spoiled from using languages with compilers.

    – user1717828
    Mar 19 at 9:53



















3














  1. Count the occurrence of max number


  2. iterate over the list to print the max number for the range of the count (1)


Hence:



item_no = [5, 6, 7, 8, 8]
counter = item_no.count(max(item_no)) # 2
print([max(item_no) for x in range(counter)])


OUTPUT:



[8, 8]





share|improve this answer























  • How do you find the index of the result in item_no?

    – user11206537
    Mar 18 at 8:56


















2














This issue can be solved in one line, by finding an item which is equal to the maximum value:
To improve performance store max in var
Mvalue=max(item_no)
[i for i in item_no if i==Mvalue]






share|improve this answer




















  • 1





    How do you find the index of the result in item_no?

    – user11206537
    Mar 18 at 9:01











  • By using enumerate function, we can get index position: [i for i, val in enumerate(item_no) if val in result]

    – Pradeep Pandey
    Mar 18 at 11:56












  • But isn't max called n times? Not efficient.

    – Sachin Dangol
    2 days ago


















1














I think it would be better if we evaluate the max in the array and its count in one iteration



def maxs(iterable):
max = None
count = 0
for index, value in enumerate(iterable):
if index == 0 or value >= max:
if value != max:
count = 0
max = value
count += 1
return count * [max]


print (maxs([5, 6, 7, 8, 8])) # [8, 8]
print (maxs([3, 2, 4, 5, 1, 2, 4, 5, 2, 5, 0])) # [5, 5, 5]
print (maxs([])) # []


Give it a Try!!






share|improve this answer























  • I did! And it worked! That's a very efficient solution.

    – user11206537
    2 days ago











  • @user11206537 Did you measure and compared the efficiency among the solutions. Can you share with us?

    – Grijesh Chauhan
    2 days ago











  • This kind of solution was the one that was actually needed as a part of my school project and my teacher thought of it as a very efficient solution. This code is also written along the lines of my current programming style, which is exactly what I wanted.

    – user11206537
    yesterday










Your Answer






StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function ()
StackExchange.using("snippets", function ()
StackExchange.snippets.init();
);
);
, "code-snippets");

StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "1"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);

else
createEditor();

);

function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);



);






user11206537 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.









draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f55216278%2fhow-to-find-the-largest-numbers-in-a-list-of-elements-possibly-non-unique%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























6 Answers
6






active

oldest

votes








6 Answers
6






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









27














Just get the maximum using max and then its count and combine the two in a list-comprehension.



item_no = [5, 6, 7, 8, 8]

max_no = max(item_no)
highest = [max_no for _ in range(item_no.count(max_no))]
print(highest) # -> [8, 8]


Note that this will return a list of a single item in case your maximum value appears only once.




A solution closer to your current programming style would be the following:



item_no = [5, 6, 7, 8, 8]
max_no = 0 # Note 1
for i in item_no:
if i > max_no:
max_no = i
high = [i]
elif i == max_no:
high.append(i)


with the same results as above of course.



Notes



  1. I am assuming that you are dealing with N* (1, 2, ...) numbers only. If that is not the case, initializing with -math.inf should be used instead.


Note that the second code snippet is less efficient than the first by quite a margin. Python allows you to be more efficient than these explicit, fortran-like loops and it is more efficient itself when you use it properly.






share|improve this answer

























  • Actually, I would love to use the first code, but since this part of my school project, I am not allowed to use inbuilt functions, therefore I need to use the second code.

    – user11206537
    Mar 18 at 7:42






  • 2





    @user11206537 I kinda saw this coming. Knowing what a better way would be is still of some value. Have fun!

    – Ev. Kounis
    Mar 18 at 7:44











  • One last question, how do you find the index of the result (high) in item_no?

    – user11206537
    Mar 18 at 8:32







  • 3





    @user11206537 To get the index as well, you can modify the code slightly and use enumerate on item_no. As you loop through, store the index in a 2nd list as you do for the max. Take a look at this

    – Ev. Kounis
    Mar 18 at 9:32






  • 1





    @Drew Yes, you're right; if item_no[0] == 0, the code crashes as high isn't defined when reaching high.append(i).

    – PiCTo
    Mar 19 at 0:03















27














Just get the maximum using max and then its count and combine the two in a list-comprehension.



item_no = [5, 6, 7, 8, 8]

max_no = max(item_no)
highest = [max_no for _ in range(item_no.count(max_no))]
print(highest) # -> [8, 8]


Note that this will return a list of a single item in case your maximum value appears only once.




A solution closer to your current programming style would be the following:



item_no = [5, 6, 7, 8, 8]
max_no = 0 # Note 1
for i in item_no:
if i > max_no:
max_no = i
high = [i]
elif i == max_no:
high.append(i)


with the same results as above of course.



Notes



  1. I am assuming that you are dealing with N* (1, 2, ...) numbers only. If that is not the case, initializing with -math.inf should be used instead.


Note that the second code snippet is less efficient than the first by quite a margin. Python allows you to be more efficient than these explicit, fortran-like loops and it is more efficient itself when you use it properly.






share|improve this answer

























  • Actually, I would love to use the first code, but since this part of my school project, I am not allowed to use inbuilt functions, therefore I need to use the second code.

    – user11206537
    Mar 18 at 7:42






  • 2





    @user11206537 I kinda saw this coming. Knowing what a better way would be is still of some value. Have fun!

    – Ev. Kounis
    Mar 18 at 7:44











  • One last question, how do you find the index of the result (high) in item_no?

    – user11206537
    Mar 18 at 8:32







  • 3





    @user11206537 To get the index as well, you can modify the code slightly and use enumerate on item_no. As you loop through, store the index in a 2nd list as you do for the max. Take a look at this

    – Ev. Kounis
    Mar 18 at 9:32






  • 1





    @Drew Yes, you're right; if item_no[0] == 0, the code crashes as high isn't defined when reaching high.append(i).

    – PiCTo
    Mar 19 at 0:03













27












27








27







Just get the maximum using max and then its count and combine the two in a list-comprehension.



item_no = [5, 6, 7, 8, 8]

max_no = max(item_no)
highest = [max_no for _ in range(item_no.count(max_no))]
print(highest) # -> [8, 8]


Note that this will return a list of a single item in case your maximum value appears only once.




A solution closer to your current programming style would be the following:



item_no = [5, 6, 7, 8, 8]
max_no = 0 # Note 1
for i in item_no:
if i > max_no:
max_no = i
high = [i]
elif i == max_no:
high.append(i)


with the same results as above of course.



Notes



  1. I am assuming that you are dealing with N* (1, 2, ...) numbers only. If that is not the case, initializing with -math.inf should be used instead.


Note that the second code snippet is less efficient than the first by quite a margin. Python allows you to be more efficient than these explicit, fortran-like loops and it is more efficient itself when you use it properly.






share|improve this answer















Just get the maximum using max and then its count and combine the two in a list-comprehension.



item_no = [5, 6, 7, 8, 8]

max_no = max(item_no)
highest = [max_no for _ in range(item_no.count(max_no))]
print(highest) # -> [8, 8]


Note that this will return a list of a single item in case your maximum value appears only once.




A solution closer to your current programming style would be the following:



item_no = [5, 6, 7, 8, 8]
max_no = 0 # Note 1
for i in item_no:
if i > max_no:
max_no = i
high = [i]
elif i == max_no:
high.append(i)


with the same results as above of course.



Notes



  1. I am assuming that you are dealing with N* (1, 2, ...) numbers only. If that is not the case, initializing with -math.inf should be used instead.


Note that the second code snippet is less efficient than the first by quite a margin. Python allows you to be more efficient than these explicit, fortran-like loops and it is more efficient itself when you use it properly.







share|improve this answer














share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer








edited Mar 19 at 7:10

























answered Mar 18 at 7:22









Ev. KounisEv. Kounis

11.3k21751




11.3k21751












  • Actually, I would love to use the first code, but since this part of my school project, I am not allowed to use inbuilt functions, therefore I need to use the second code.

    – user11206537
    Mar 18 at 7:42






  • 2





    @user11206537 I kinda saw this coming. Knowing what a better way would be is still of some value. Have fun!

    – Ev. Kounis
    Mar 18 at 7:44











  • One last question, how do you find the index of the result (high) in item_no?

    – user11206537
    Mar 18 at 8:32







  • 3





    @user11206537 To get the index as well, you can modify the code slightly and use enumerate on item_no. As you loop through, store the index in a 2nd list as you do for the max. Take a look at this

    – Ev. Kounis
    Mar 18 at 9:32






  • 1





    @Drew Yes, you're right; if item_no[0] == 0, the code crashes as high isn't defined when reaching high.append(i).

    – PiCTo
    Mar 19 at 0:03

















  • Actually, I would love to use the first code, but since this part of my school project, I am not allowed to use inbuilt functions, therefore I need to use the second code.

    – user11206537
    Mar 18 at 7:42






  • 2





    @user11206537 I kinda saw this coming. Knowing what a better way would be is still of some value. Have fun!

    – Ev. Kounis
    Mar 18 at 7:44











  • One last question, how do you find the index of the result (high) in item_no?

    – user11206537
    Mar 18 at 8:32







  • 3





    @user11206537 To get the index as well, you can modify the code slightly and use enumerate on item_no. As you loop through, store the index in a 2nd list as you do for the max. Take a look at this

    – Ev. Kounis
    Mar 18 at 9:32






  • 1





    @Drew Yes, you're right; if item_no[0] == 0, the code crashes as high isn't defined when reaching high.append(i).

    – PiCTo
    Mar 19 at 0:03
















Actually, I would love to use the first code, but since this part of my school project, I am not allowed to use inbuilt functions, therefore I need to use the second code.

– user11206537
Mar 18 at 7:42





Actually, I would love to use the first code, but since this part of my school project, I am not allowed to use inbuilt functions, therefore I need to use the second code.

– user11206537
Mar 18 at 7:42




2




2





@user11206537 I kinda saw this coming. Knowing what a better way would be is still of some value. Have fun!

– Ev. Kounis
Mar 18 at 7:44





@user11206537 I kinda saw this coming. Knowing what a better way would be is still of some value. Have fun!

– Ev. Kounis
Mar 18 at 7:44













One last question, how do you find the index of the result (high) in item_no?

– user11206537
Mar 18 at 8:32






One last question, how do you find the index of the result (high) in item_no?

– user11206537
Mar 18 at 8:32





3




3





@user11206537 To get the index as well, you can modify the code slightly and use enumerate on item_no. As you loop through, store the index in a 2nd list as you do for the max. Take a look at this

– Ev. Kounis
Mar 18 at 9:32





@user11206537 To get the index as well, you can modify the code slightly and use enumerate on item_no. As you loop through, store the index in a 2nd list as you do for the max. Take a look at this

– Ev. Kounis
Mar 18 at 9:32




1




1





@Drew Yes, you're right; if item_no[0] == 0, the code crashes as high isn't defined when reaching high.append(i).

– PiCTo
Mar 19 at 0:03





@Drew Yes, you're right; if item_no[0] == 0, the code crashes as high isn't defined when reaching high.append(i).

– PiCTo
Mar 19 at 0:03













15














You can do it even shorter:



item_no = [5, 6, 7, 8, 8]
#compute once - use many
max_item = max(item_no)
print(item_no.count(max_item) * [max_item])


output:



[8, 8]





share|improve this answer

























  • One last question, how do you find the index of the result in item_no?

    – user11206537
    Mar 18 at 8:48
















15














You can do it even shorter:



item_no = [5, 6, 7, 8, 8]
#compute once - use many
max_item = max(item_no)
print(item_no.count(max_item) * [max_item])


output:



[8, 8]





share|improve this answer

























  • One last question, how do you find the index of the result in item_no?

    – user11206537
    Mar 18 at 8:48














15












15








15







You can do it even shorter:



item_no = [5, 6, 7, 8, 8]
#compute once - use many
max_item = max(item_no)
print(item_no.count(max_item) * [max_item])


output:



[8, 8]





share|improve this answer















You can do it even shorter:



item_no = [5, 6, 7, 8, 8]
#compute once - use many
max_item = max(item_no)
print(item_no.count(max_item) * [max_item])


output:



[8, 8]






share|improve this answer














share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer








edited Mar 18 at 11:40

























answered Mar 18 at 7:30









AllanAllan

8,04231535




8,04231535












  • One last question, how do you find the index of the result in item_no?

    – user11206537
    Mar 18 at 8:48


















  • One last question, how do you find the index of the result in item_no?

    – user11206537
    Mar 18 at 8:48

















One last question, how do you find the index of the result in item_no?

– user11206537
Mar 18 at 8:48






One last question, how do you find the index of the result in item_no?

– user11206537
Mar 18 at 8:48












4














You could use list comprehension for that task following way:



numbers = [5, 6, 7, 8, 8]
maxnumbers = [i for i in numbers if i==max(numbers)]
print(*maxnumbers,sep=',')


output:



8,8


* operator in print is used to unpack values, sep is used to inform print what seperator to use: , in this case.



EDIT: If you want to get indices of biggest value and call max only once then do:



numbers = [5, 6, 7, 8, 8]
biggest = max(numbers)
positions = [inx for inx,i in enumerate(numbers) if i==biggest]
print(*positions,sep=',')


Output:



3,4


As you might check numbers[3] is equal to biggest and numbers[4] is equal to biggest.






share|improve this answer




















  • 4





    note that your solution calls max a total of len(numbers) times. Storing it outside the list and then using that would be better.

    – Ev. Kounis
    Mar 18 at 7:31












  • How do you find the index of the result in item_no?

    – user11206537
    Mar 18 at 9:01











  • @Ev.Kounis I assume the Python interpreter optimizes this, no?

    – user1717828
    Mar 18 at 16:38











  • @user1717828 No it does not.

    – Ev. Kounis
    Mar 19 at 7:04











  • @Ev.Kounis, Oh man, I didn't believe this so I tested it out. python -m timeit "numbers = [5, 6, 7, 8, 8]; max_number = max(numbers); maxnumbers = [i for i in numbers if i==max_number]" is twice as fast as when the max calculation is in the comprehension. I've gotten very spoiled from using languages with compilers.

    – user1717828
    Mar 19 at 9:53
















4














You could use list comprehension for that task following way:



numbers = [5, 6, 7, 8, 8]
maxnumbers = [i for i in numbers if i==max(numbers)]
print(*maxnumbers,sep=',')


output:



8,8


* operator in print is used to unpack values, sep is used to inform print what seperator to use: , in this case.



EDIT: If you want to get indices of biggest value and call max only once then do:



numbers = [5, 6, 7, 8, 8]
biggest = max(numbers)
positions = [inx for inx,i in enumerate(numbers) if i==biggest]
print(*positions,sep=',')


Output:



3,4


As you might check numbers[3] is equal to biggest and numbers[4] is equal to biggest.






share|improve this answer




















  • 4





    note that your solution calls max a total of len(numbers) times. Storing it outside the list and then using that would be better.

    – Ev. Kounis
    Mar 18 at 7:31












  • How do you find the index of the result in item_no?

    – user11206537
    Mar 18 at 9:01











  • @Ev.Kounis I assume the Python interpreter optimizes this, no?

    – user1717828
    Mar 18 at 16:38











  • @user1717828 No it does not.

    – Ev. Kounis
    Mar 19 at 7:04











  • @Ev.Kounis, Oh man, I didn't believe this so I tested it out. python -m timeit "numbers = [5, 6, 7, 8, 8]; max_number = max(numbers); maxnumbers = [i for i in numbers if i==max_number]" is twice as fast as when the max calculation is in the comprehension. I've gotten very spoiled from using languages with compilers.

    – user1717828
    Mar 19 at 9:53














4












4








4







You could use list comprehension for that task following way:



numbers = [5, 6, 7, 8, 8]
maxnumbers = [i for i in numbers if i==max(numbers)]
print(*maxnumbers,sep=',')


output:



8,8


* operator in print is used to unpack values, sep is used to inform print what seperator to use: , in this case.



EDIT: If you want to get indices of biggest value and call max only once then do:



numbers = [5, 6, 7, 8, 8]
biggest = max(numbers)
positions = [inx for inx,i in enumerate(numbers) if i==biggest]
print(*positions,sep=',')


Output:



3,4


As you might check numbers[3] is equal to biggest and numbers[4] is equal to biggest.






share|improve this answer















You could use list comprehension for that task following way:



numbers = [5, 6, 7, 8, 8]
maxnumbers = [i for i in numbers if i==max(numbers)]
print(*maxnumbers,sep=',')


output:



8,8


* operator in print is used to unpack values, sep is used to inform print what seperator to use: , in this case.



EDIT: If you want to get indices of biggest value and call max only once then do:



numbers = [5, 6, 7, 8, 8]
biggest = max(numbers)
positions = [inx for inx,i in enumerate(numbers) if i==biggest]
print(*positions,sep=',')


Output:



3,4


As you might check numbers[3] is equal to biggest and numbers[4] is equal to biggest.







share|improve this answer














share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer








edited Mar 18 at 10:02

























answered Mar 18 at 7:29









DaweoDaweo

1,08525




1,08525







  • 4





    note that your solution calls max a total of len(numbers) times. Storing it outside the list and then using that would be better.

    – Ev. Kounis
    Mar 18 at 7:31












  • How do you find the index of the result in item_no?

    – user11206537
    Mar 18 at 9:01











  • @Ev.Kounis I assume the Python interpreter optimizes this, no?

    – user1717828
    Mar 18 at 16:38











  • @user1717828 No it does not.

    – Ev. Kounis
    Mar 19 at 7:04











  • @Ev.Kounis, Oh man, I didn't believe this so I tested it out. python -m timeit "numbers = [5, 6, 7, 8, 8]; max_number = max(numbers); maxnumbers = [i for i in numbers if i==max_number]" is twice as fast as when the max calculation is in the comprehension. I've gotten very spoiled from using languages with compilers.

    – user1717828
    Mar 19 at 9:53













  • 4





    note that your solution calls max a total of len(numbers) times. Storing it outside the list and then using that would be better.

    – Ev. Kounis
    Mar 18 at 7:31












  • How do you find the index of the result in item_no?

    – user11206537
    Mar 18 at 9:01











  • @Ev.Kounis I assume the Python interpreter optimizes this, no?

    – user1717828
    Mar 18 at 16:38











  • @user1717828 No it does not.

    – Ev. Kounis
    Mar 19 at 7:04











  • @Ev.Kounis, Oh man, I didn't believe this so I tested it out. python -m timeit "numbers = [5, 6, 7, 8, 8]; max_number = max(numbers); maxnumbers = [i for i in numbers if i==max_number]" is twice as fast as when the max calculation is in the comprehension. I've gotten very spoiled from using languages with compilers.

    – user1717828
    Mar 19 at 9:53








4




4





note that your solution calls max a total of len(numbers) times. Storing it outside the list and then using that would be better.

– Ev. Kounis
Mar 18 at 7:31






note that your solution calls max a total of len(numbers) times. Storing it outside the list and then using that would be better.

– Ev. Kounis
Mar 18 at 7:31














How do you find the index of the result in item_no?

– user11206537
Mar 18 at 9:01





How do you find the index of the result in item_no?

– user11206537
Mar 18 at 9:01













@Ev.Kounis I assume the Python interpreter optimizes this, no?

– user1717828
Mar 18 at 16:38





@Ev.Kounis I assume the Python interpreter optimizes this, no?

– user1717828
Mar 18 at 16:38













@user1717828 No it does not.

– Ev. Kounis
Mar 19 at 7:04





@user1717828 No it does not.

– Ev. Kounis
Mar 19 at 7:04













@Ev.Kounis, Oh man, I didn't believe this so I tested it out. python -m timeit "numbers = [5, 6, 7, 8, 8]; max_number = max(numbers); maxnumbers = [i for i in numbers if i==max_number]" is twice as fast as when the max calculation is in the comprehension. I've gotten very spoiled from using languages with compilers.

– user1717828
Mar 19 at 9:53






@Ev.Kounis, Oh man, I didn't believe this so I tested it out. python -m timeit "numbers = [5, 6, 7, 8, 8]; max_number = max(numbers); maxnumbers = [i for i in numbers if i==max_number]" is twice as fast as when the max calculation is in the comprehension. I've gotten very spoiled from using languages with compilers.

– user1717828
Mar 19 at 9:53












3














  1. Count the occurrence of max number


  2. iterate over the list to print the max number for the range of the count (1)


Hence:



item_no = [5, 6, 7, 8, 8]
counter = item_no.count(max(item_no)) # 2
print([max(item_no) for x in range(counter)])


OUTPUT:



[8, 8]





share|improve this answer























  • How do you find the index of the result in item_no?

    – user11206537
    Mar 18 at 8:56















3














  1. Count the occurrence of max number


  2. iterate over the list to print the max number for the range of the count (1)


Hence:



item_no = [5, 6, 7, 8, 8]
counter = item_no.count(max(item_no)) # 2
print([max(item_no) for x in range(counter)])


OUTPUT:



[8, 8]





share|improve this answer























  • How do you find the index of the result in item_no?

    – user11206537
    Mar 18 at 8:56













3












3








3







  1. Count the occurrence of max number


  2. iterate over the list to print the max number for the range of the count (1)


Hence:



item_no = [5, 6, 7, 8, 8]
counter = item_no.count(max(item_no)) # 2
print([max(item_no) for x in range(counter)])


OUTPUT:



[8, 8]





share|improve this answer













  1. Count the occurrence of max number


  2. iterate over the list to print the max number for the range of the count (1)


Hence:



item_no = [5, 6, 7, 8, 8]
counter = item_no.count(max(item_no)) # 2
print([max(item_no) for x in range(counter)])


OUTPUT:



[8, 8]






share|improve this answer












share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer










answered Mar 18 at 7:35









DirtyBitDirtyBit

10.1k21540




10.1k21540












  • How do you find the index of the result in item_no?

    – user11206537
    Mar 18 at 8:56

















  • How do you find the index of the result in item_no?

    – user11206537
    Mar 18 at 8:56
















How do you find the index of the result in item_no?

– user11206537
Mar 18 at 8:56





How do you find the index of the result in item_no?

– user11206537
Mar 18 at 8:56











2














This issue can be solved in one line, by finding an item which is equal to the maximum value:
To improve performance store max in var
Mvalue=max(item_no)
[i for i in item_no if i==Mvalue]






share|improve this answer




















  • 1





    How do you find the index of the result in item_no?

    – user11206537
    Mar 18 at 9:01











  • By using enumerate function, we can get index position: [i for i, val in enumerate(item_no) if val in result]

    – Pradeep Pandey
    Mar 18 at 11:56












  • But isn't max called n times? Not efficient.

    – Sachin Dangol
    2 days ago















2














This issue can be solved in one line, by finding an item which is equal to the maximum value:
To improve performance store max in var
Mvalue=max(item_no)
[i for i in item_no if i==Mvalue]






share|improve this answer




















  • 1





    How do you find the index of the result in item_no?

    – user11206537
    Mar 18 at 9:01











  • By using enumerate function, we can get index position: [i for i, val in enumerate(item_no) if val in result]

    – Pradeep Pandey
    Mar 18 at 11:56












  • But isn't max called n times? Not efficient.

    – Sachin Dangol
    2 days ago













2












2








2







This issue can be solved in one line, by finding an item which is equal to the maximum value:
To improve performance store max in var
Mvalue=max(item_no)
[i for i in item_no if i==Mvalue]






share|improve this answer















This issue can be solved in one line, by finding an item which is equal to the maximum value:
To improve performance store max in var
Mvalue=max(item_no)
[i for i in item_no if i==Mvalue]







share|improve this answer














share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer








edited yesterday

























answered Mar 18 at 8:06









Pradeep PandeyPradeep Pandey

17917




17917







  • 1





    How do you find the index of the result in item_no?

    – user11206537
    Mar 18 at 9:01











  • By using enumerate function, we can get index position: [i for i, val in enumerate(item_no) if val in result]

    – Pradeep Pandey
    Mar 18 at 11:56












  • But isn't max called n times? Not efficient.

    – Sachin Dangol
    2 days ago












  • 1





    How do you find the index of the result in item_no?

    – user11206537
    Mar 18 at 9:01











  • By using enumerate function, we can get index position: [i for i, val in enumerate(item_no) if val in result]

    – Pradeep Pandey
    Mar 18 at 11:56












  • But isn't max called n times? Not efficient.

    – Sachin Dangol
    2 days ago







1




1





How do you find the index of the result in item_no?

– user11206537
Mar 18 at 9:01





How do you find the index of the result in item_no?

– user11206537
Mar 18 at 9:01













By using enumerate function, we can get index position: [i for i, val in enumerate(item_no) if val in result]

– Pradeep Pandey
Mar 18 at 11:56






By using enumerate function, we can get index position: [i for i, val in enumerate(item_no) if val in result]

– Pradeep Pandey
Mar 18 at 11:56














But isn't max called n times? Not efficient.

– Sachin Dangol
2 days ago





But isn't max called n times? Not efficient.

– Sachin Dangol
2 days ago











1














I think it would be better if we evaluate the max in the array and its count in one iteration



def maxs(iterable):
max = None
count = 0
for index, value in enumerate(iterable):
if index == 0 or value >= max:
if value != max:
count = 0
max = value
count += 1
return count * [max]


print (maxs([5, 6, 7, 8, 8])) # [8, 8]
print (maxs([3, 2, 4, 5, 1, 2, 4, 5, 2, 5, 0])) # [5, 5, 5]
print (maxs([])) # []


Give it a Try!!






share|improve this answer























  • I did! And it worked! That's a very efficient solution.

    – user11206537
    2 days ago











  • @user11206537 Did you measure and compared the efficiency among the solutions. Can you share with us?

    – Grijesh Chauhan
    2 days ago











  • This kind of solution was the one that was actually needed as a part of my school project and my teacher thought of it as a very efficient solution. This code is also written along the lines of my current programming style, which is exactly what I wanted.

    – user11206537
    yesterday















1














I think it would be better if we evaluate the max in the array and its count in one iteration



def maxs(iterable):
max = None
count = 0
for index, value in enumerate(iterable):
if index == 0 or value >= max:
if value != max:
count = 0
max = value
count += 1
return count * [max]


print (maxs([5, 6, 7, 8, 8])) # [8, 8]
print (maxs([3, 2, 4, 5, 1, 2, 4, 5, 2, 5, 0])) # [5, 5, 5]
print (maxs([])) # []


Give it a Try!!






share|improve this answer























  • I did! And it worked! That's a very efficient solution.

    – user11206537
    2 days ago











  • @user11206537 Did you measure and compared the efficiency among the solutions. Can you share with us?

    – Grijesh Chauhan
    2 days ago











  • This kind of solution was the one that was actually needed as a part of my school project and my teacher thought of it as a very efficient solution. This code is also written along the lines of my current programming style, which is exactly what I wanted.

    – user11206537
    yesterday













1












1








1







I think it would be better if we evaluate the max in the array and its count in one iteration



def maxs(iterable):
max = None
count = 0
for index, value in enumerate(iterable):
if index == 0 or value >= max:
if value != max:
count = 0
max = value
count += 1
return count * [max]


print (maxs([5, 6, 7, 8, 8])) # [8, 8]
print (maxs([3, 2, 4, 5, 1, 2, 4, 5, 2, 5, 0])) # [5, 5, 5]
print (maxs([])) # []


Give it a Try!!






share|improve this answer













I think it would be better if we evaluate the max in the array and its count in one iteration



def maxs(iterable):
max = None
count = 0
for index, value in enumerate(iterable):
if index == 0 or value >= max:
if value != max:
count = 0
max = value
count += 1
return count * [max]


print (maxs([5, 6, 7, 8, 8])) # [8, 8]
print (maxs([3, 2, 4, 5, 1, 2, 4, 5, 2, 5, 0])) # [5, 5, 5]
print (maxs([])) # []


Give it a Try!!







share|improve this answer












share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer










answered 2 days ago









Grijesh ChauhanGrijesh Chauhan

45.8k1498163




45.8k1498163












  • I did! And it worked! That's a very efficient solution.

    – user11206537
    2 days ago











  • @user11206537 Did you measure and compared the efficiency among the solutions. Can you share with us?

    – Grijesh Chauhan
    2 days ago











  • This kind of solution was the one that was actually needed as a part of my school project and my teacher thought of it as a very efficient solution. This code is also written along the lines of my current programming style, which is exactly what I wanted.

    – user11206537
    yesterday

















  • I did! And it worked! That's a very efficient solution.

    – user11206537
    2 days ago











  • @user11206537 Did you measure and compared the efficiency among the solutions. Can you share with us?

    – Grijesh Chauhan
    2 days ago











  • This kind of solution was the one that was actually needed as a part of my school project and my teacher thought of it as a very efficient solution. This code is also written along the lines of my current programming style, which is exactly what I wanted.

    – user11206537
    yesterday
















I did! And it worked! That's a very efficient solution.

– user11206537
2 days ago





I did! And it worked! That's a very efficient solution.

– user11206537
2 days ago













@user11206537 Did you measure and compared the efficiency among the solutions. Can you share with us?

– Grijesh Chauhan
2 days ago





@user11206537 Did you measure and compared the efficiency among the solutions. Can you share with us?

– Grijesh Chauhan
2 days ago













This kind of solution was the one that was actually needed as a part of my school project and my teacher thought of it as a very efficient solution. This code is also written along the lines of my current programming style, which is exactly what I wanted.

– user11206537
yesterday





This kind of solution was the one that was actually needed as a part of my school project and my teacher thought of it as a very efficient solution. This code is also written along the lines of my current programming style, which is exactly what I wanted.

– user11206537
yesterday










user11206537 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.









draft saved

draft discarded


















user11206537 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.












user11206537 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.











user11206537 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.














Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid


  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f55216278%2fhow-to-find-the-largest-numbers-in-a-list-of-elements-possibly-non-unique%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Færeyskur hestur Heimild | Tengill | Tilvísanir | LeiðsagnarvalRossið - síða um færeyska hrossið á færeyskuGott ár hjá færeyska hestinum

He _____ here since 1970 . Answer needed [closed]What does “since he was so high” mean?Meaning of “catch birds for”?How do I ensure “since” takes the meaning I want?“Who cares here” meaningWhat does “right round toward” mean?the time tense (had now been detected)What does the phrase “ring around the roses” mean here?Correct usage of “visited upon”Meaning of “foiled rail sabotage bid”It was the third time I had gone to Rome or It is the third time I had been to Rome

Slayer Innehåll Historia | Stil, komposition och lyrik | Bandets betydelse och framgångar | Sidoprojekt och samarbeten | Kontroverser | Medlemmar | Utmärkelser och nomineringar | Turnéer och festivaler | Diskografi | Referenser | Externa länkar | Navigeringsmenywww.slayer.net”Metal Massacre vol. 1””Metal Massacre vol. 3””Metal Massacre Volume III””Show No Mercy””Haunting the Chapel””Live Undead””Hell Awaits””Reign in Blood””Reign in Blood””Gold & Platinum – Reign in Blood””Golden Gods Awards Winners”originalet”Kerrang! Hall Of Fame””Slayer Looks Back On 37-Year Career In New Video Series: Part Two””South of Heaven””Gold & Platinum – South of Heaven””Seasons in the Abyss””Gold & Platinum - Seasons in the Abyss””Divine Intervention””Divine Intervention - Release group by Slayer””Gold & Platinum - Divine Intervention””Live Intrusion””Undisputed Attitude””Abolish Government/Superficial Love””Release “Slatanic Slaughter: A Tribute to Slayer” by Various Artists””Diabolus in Musica””Soundtrack to the Apocalypse””God Hates Us All””Systematic - Relationships””War at the Warfield””Gold & Platinum - War at the Warfield””Soundtrack to the Apocalypse””Gold & Platinum - Still Reigning””Metallica, Slayer, Iron Mauden Among Winners At Metal Hammer Awards””Eternal Pyre””Eternal Pyre - Slayer release group””Eternal Pyre””Metal Storm Awards 2006””Kerrang! Hall Of Fame””Slayer Wins 'Best Metal' Grammy Award””Slayer Guitarist Jeff Hanneman Dies””Bullet-For My Valentine booed at Metal Hammer Golden Gods Awards””Unholy Aliance””The End Of Slayer?””Slayer: We Could Thrash Out Two More Albums If We're Fast Enough...””'The Unholy Alliance: Chapter III' UK Dates Added”originalet”Megadeth And Slayer To Co-Headline 'Canadian Carnage' Trek”originalet”World Painted Blood””Release “World Painted Blood” by Slayer””Metallica Heading To Cinemas””Slayer, Megadeth To Join Forces For 'European Carnage' Tour - Dec. 18, 2010”originalet”Slayer's Hanneman Contracts Acute Infection; Band To Bring In Guest Guitarist””Cannibal Corpse's Pat O'Brien Will Step In As Slayer's Guest Guitarist”originalet”Slayer’s Jeff Hanneman Dead at 49””Dave Lombardo Says He Made Only $67,000 In 2011 While Touring With Slayer””Slayer: We Do Not Agree With Dave Lombardo's Substance Or Timeline Of Events””Slayer Welcomes Drummer Paul Bostaph Back To The Fold””Slayer Hope to Unveil Never-Before-Heard Jeff Hanneman Material on Next Album””Slayer Debut New Song 'Implode' During Surprise Golden Gods Appearance””Release group Repentless by Slayer””Repentless - Slayer - Credits””Slayer””Metal Storm Awards 2015””Slayer - to release comic book "Repentless #1"””Slayer To Release 'Repentless' 6.66" Vinyl Box Set””BREAKING NEWS: Slayer Announce Farewell Tour””Slayer Recruit Lamb of God, Anthrax, Behemoth + Testament for Final Tour””Slayer lägger ner efter 37 år””Slayer Announces Second North American Leg Of 'Final' Tour””Final World Tour””Slayer Announces Final European Tour With Lamb of God, Anthrax And Obituary””Slayer To Tour Europe With Lamb of God, Anthrax And Obituary””Slayer To Play 'Last French Show Ever' At Next Year's Hellfst””Slayer's Final World Tour Will Extend Into 2019””Death Angel's Rob Cavestany On Slayer's 'Farewell' Tour: 'Some Of Us Could See This Coming'””Testament Has No Plans To Retire Anytime Soon, Says Chuck Billy””Anthrax's Scott Ian On Slayer's 'Farewell' Tour Plans: 'I Was Surprised And I Wasn't Surprised'””Slayer””Slayer's Morbid Schlock””Review/Rock; For Slayer, the Mania Is the Message””Slayer - Biography””Slayer - Reign In Blood”originalet”Dave Lombardo””An exclusive oral history of Slayer”originalet”Exclusive! Interview With Slayer Guitarist Jeff Hanneman”originalet”Thinking Out Loud: Slayer's Kerry King on hair metal, Satan and being polite””Slayer Lyrics””Slayer - Biography””Most influential artists for extreme metal music””Slayer - Reign in Blood””Slayer guitarist Jeff Hanneman dies aged 49””Slatanic Slaughter: A Tribute to Slayer””Gateway to Hell: A Tribute to Slayer””Covered In Blood””Slayer: The Origins of Thrash in San Francisco, CA.””Why They Rule - #6 Slayer”originalet”Guitar World's 100 Greatest Heavy Metal Guitarists Of All Time”originalet”The fans have spoken: Slayer comes out on top in readers' polls”originalet”Tribute to Jeff Hanneman (1964-2013)””Lamb Of God Frontman: We Sound Like A Slayer Rip-Off””BEHEMOTH Frontman Pays Tribute To SLAYER's JEFF HANNEMAN””Slayer, Hatebreed Doing Double Duty On This Year's Ozzfest””System of a Down””Lacuna Coil’s Andrea Ferro Talks Influences, Skateboarding, Band Origins + More””Slayer - Reign in Blood””Into The Lungs of Hell””Slayer rules - en utställning om fans””Slayer and Their Fans Slashed Through a No-Holds-Barred Night at Gas Monkey””Home””Slayer””Gold & Platinum - The Big 4 Live from Sofia, Bulgaria””Exclusive! Interview With Slayer Guitarist Kerry King””2008-02-23: Wiltern, Los Angeles, CA, USA””Slayer's Kerry King To Perform With Megadeth Tonight! - Oct. 21, 2010”originalet”Dave Lombardo - Biography”Slayer Case DismissedArkiveradUltimate Classic Rock: Slayer guitarist Jeff Hanneman dead at 49.”Slayer: "We could never do any thing like Some Kind Of Monster..."””Cannibal Corpse'S Pat O'Brien Will Step In As Slayer'S Guest Guitarist | The Official Slayer Site”originalet”Slayer Wins 'Best Metal' Grammy Award””Slayer Guitarist Jeff Hanneman Dies””Kerrang! Awards 2006 Blog: Kerrang! Hall Of Fame””Kerrang! Awards 2013: Kerrang! Legend”originalet”Metallica, Slayer, Iron Maien Among Winners At Metal Hammer Awards””Metal Hammer Golden Gods Awards””Bullet For My Valentine Booed At Metal Hammer Golden Gods Awards””Metal Storm Awards 2006””Metal Storm Awards 2015””Slayer's Concert History””Slayer - Relationships””Slayer - Releases”Slayers officiella webbplatsSlayer på MusicBrainzOfficiell webbplatsSlayerSlayerr1373445760000 0001 1540 47353068615-5086262726cb13906545x(data)6033143kn20030215029