Mishloach Manot - why the word Mishloach is used specificallyPurim and Shushan PurimParashat TzavMishloach Manot must be “ready to eat” - from whose perspective?“Sending” mishloach manot by serving themIs “recycling” Mishloach Manot halachically acceptable?Why is “communal” mishloach manot allowed?To avoid bal tashchis, halachically, should people limit the quantity of “junk food” in mishloach manot?Can a shaliach assemble your mishloach manot for you?Can a shaliach buy food to give as mishloach manot?Giving mishloach manot/matanot la'evyonim to a non-JewMishloach Manot food to decor ratioMishloach Manot - why the word Manot is used specifically
Strong empirical falsification of quantum mechanics based on vacuum energy density?
How to explain what's wrong with this application of the chain rule?
Shouldn’t conservatives embrace universal basic income?
What features enable the Su-25 Frogfoot to operate with such a wide variety of fuels?
Is this part of the description of the Archfey warlock's Misty Escape feature redundant?
What if a revenant (monster) gains fire resistance?
Are Captain Marvel's powers affected by Thanos breaking the Tesseract and claiming the stone?
Has any country ever had 2 former presidents in jail simultaneously?
Delete multiple columns using awk or sed
Can I say "fingers" when referring to toes?
How would you translate "more" for use as an interface button?
Mimic lecturing on blackboard, facing audience
Why is so much work done on numerical verification of the Riemann Hypothesis?
This is why we puzzle
Does the reader need to like the PoV character?
What does "Scientists rise up against statistical significance" mean? (Comment in Nature)
What (the heck) is a Super Worm Equinox Moon?
awk assign to multiple variables at once
The IT department bottlenecks progress, how should I handle this?
How do you make your own symbol when Detexify fails?
Birthday Problem Paraphrased
Why is it that I can sometimes guess the next note?
What does Apple's new App Store requirement mean
What is the highest possible scrabble score for placing a single tile
Mishloach Manot - why the word Mishloach is used specifically
Purim and Shushan PurimParashat TzavMishloach Manot must be “ready to eat” - from whose perspective?“Sending” mishloach manot by serving themIs “recycling” Mishloach Manot halachically acceptable?Why is “communal” mishloach manot allowed?To avoid bal tashchis, halachically, should people limit the quantity of “junk food” in mishloach manot?Can a shaliach assemble your mishloach manot for you?Can a shaliach buy food to give as mishloach manot?Giving mishloach manot/matanot la'evyonim to a non-JewMishloach Manot food to decor ratioMishloach Manot - why the word Manot is used specifically
It appears that the Halacha does not emphasize the importance of actually "sending" the Manos, they can be handed or eaten in place.
Moreover, the word לשלח is used in the Torah as "to expel", e.g. Adam was expelled from Eden or a divorced woman is "expelled" from her husband and its usage here is strange.
Why in the Meggila the action of giving out Manos is called specifically Mishloach - does it have to be far away, does it have to be by a messenger or else?
Of course, this question is based on the assumption that the Sages chose the words very carefully, and every word hints on specific applications.
purim mishloach-manot
asked Mar 18 at 15:18
Al BerkoAl Berko
6,1641529
add a comment |
It appears that the Halacha does not emphasize the importance of actually "sending" the Manos, they can be handed or eaten in place.
Moreover, the word לשלח is used in the Torah as "to expel", e.g. Adam was expelled from Eden or a divorced woman is "expelled" from her husband and its usage here is strange.
Why in the Meggila the action of giving out Manos is called specifically Mishloach - does it have to be far away, does it have to be by a messenger or else?
Of course, this question is based on the assumption that the Sages chose the words very carefully, and every word hints on specific applications.
purim mishloach-manot
asked Mar 18 at 15:18
Al BerkoAl Berko
6,1641529
3
Your examples are all in Piel
– Double AA♦
Mar 18 at 15:47
add a comment |
It appears that the Halacha does not emphasize the importance of actually "sending" the Manos, they can be handed or eaten in place.
Moreover, the word לשלח is used in the Torah as "to expel", e.g. Adam was expelled from Eden or a divorced woman is "expelled" from her husband and its usage here is strange.
Why in the Meggila the action of giving out Manos is called specifically Mishloach - does it have to be far away, does it have to be by a messenger or else?
Of course, this question is based on the assumption that the Sages chose the words very carefully, and every word hints on specific applications.
purim mishloach-manot
asked Mar 18 at 15:18
Al BerkoAl Berko
6,1641529
It appears that the Halacha does not emphasize the importance of actually "sending" the Manos, they can be handed or eaten in place.
Moreover, the word לשלח is used in the Torah as "to expel", e.g. Adam was expelled from Eden or a divorced woman is "expelled" from her husband and its usage here is strange.
Why in the Meggila the action of giving out Manos is called specifically Mishloach - does it have to be far away, does it have to be by a messenger or else?
Of course, this question is based on the assumption that the Sages chose the words very carefully, and every word hints on specific applications.
purim mishloach-manot
purim mishloach-manot
asked Mar 18 at 15:18
Al BerkoAl Berko
6,1641529
asked Mar 18 at 15:18
Al BerkoAl Berko
6,1641529
asked Mar 18 at 15:18
Al BerkoAl Berko
6,1641529
asked Mar 18 at 15:18
Al BerkoAl Berko
6,1641529
asked Mar 18 at 15:18
Al BerkoAl Berko
6,1641529
6,1641529
3
Your examples are all in Piel
– Double AA♦
Mar 18 at 15:47
add a comment |
3
Your examples are all in Piel
– Double AA♦
Mar 18 at 15:47
3
3
Your examples are all in Piel
– Double AA♦
Mar 18 at 15:47
Your examples are all in Piel
– Double AA♦
Mar 18 at 15:47
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
There is a teshuva of the Binyan Tzion which is often quoted about this issue, in Siman #44.
He explains that the language of שליחות is to indicate that the sending itself is enough, even if the recipient does not end up receiving or accepting the gift (as per the psak of the Rema, O.C. 695):
ולענ"ד טעם המהר"י ברין ורמ"א כמו שכתוב "ומשלוח מנות "
ולא כתיב "ונתון מנות " כמו דכתיב "ומתנות לאביונים ," דלשון
נתינה שייך גבי מנות כדכתיב "ונתן לפנינה וגו' מנות ולחנה יתן
מנה אחת אפים ," מזה נראה דלא הקפיד הכתוב אלא על
השילוח דהיינו שיוצא מן המשלח
He also adds on that we don't find any poskim who say that משלוח מנות specifically require sending, and personal delivery is sufficient, which he sees as support to his claim that the point of שליחות is to indicate that this is all that is required (as opposed to מתנות לאביונים, which he asserts requires the poor person to actually receive and accept it). He does, however, conclude that it may be better to send it via a messenger, though:
ומכ"מ אולי לכתחלה טוב יותר
לשלוח המנות ע"י אחר
edited Mar 18 at 15:59
mbloch
26.6k545132
answered Mar 18 at 15:27
Y e zY e z
45.4k372203
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
There is a teshuva of the Binyan Tzion which is often quoted about this issue, in Siman #44.
He explains that the language of שליחות is to indicate that the sending itself is enough, even if the recipient does not end up receiving or accepting the gift (as per the psak of the Rema, O.C. 695):
ולענ"ד טעם המהר"י ברין ורמ"א כמו שכתוב "ומשלוח מנות "
ולא כתיב "ונתון מנות " כמו דכתיב "ומתנות לאביונים ," דלשון
נתינה שייך גבי מנות כדכתיב "ונתן לפנינה וגו' מנות ולחנה יתן
מנה אחת אפים ," מזה נראה דלא הקפיד הכתוב אלא על
השילוח דהיינו שיוצא מן המשלח
He also adds on that we don't find any poskim who say that משלוח מנות specifically require sending, and personal delivery is sufficient, which he sees as support to his claim that the point of שליחות is to indicate that this is all that is required (as opposed to מתנות לאביונים, which he asserts requires the poor person to actually receive and accept it). He does, however, conclude that it may be better to send it via a messenger, though:
ומכ"מ אולי לכתחלה טוב יותר
לשלוח המנות ע"י אחר
edited Mar 18 at 15:59
mbloch
26.6k545132
answered Mar 18 at 15:27
Y e zY e z
45.4k372203
add a comment |
There is a teshuva of the Binyan Tzion which is often quoted about this issue, in Siman #44.
He explains that the language of שליחות is to indicate that the sending itself is enough, even if the recipient does not end up receiving or accepting the gift (as per the psak of the Rema, O.C. 695):
ולענ"ד טעם המהר"י ברין ורמ"א כמו שכתוב "ומשלוח מנות "
ולא כתיב "ונתון מנות " כמו דכתיב "ומתנות לאביונים ," דלשון
נתינה שייך גבי מנות כדכתיב "ונתן לפנינה וגו' מנות ולחנה יתן
מנה אחת אפים ," מזה נראה דלא הקפיד הכתוב אלא על
השילוח דהיינו שיוצא מן המשלח
He also adds on that we don't find any poskim who say that משלוח מנות specifically require sending, and personal delivery is sufficient, which he sees as support to his claim that the point of שליחות is to indicate that this is all that is required (as opposed to מתנות לאביונים, which he asserts requires the poor person to actually receive and accept it). He does, however, conclude that it may be better to send it via a messenger, though:
ומכ"מ אולי לכתחלה טוב יותר
לשלוח המנות ע"י אחר
edited Mar 18 at 15:59
mbloch
26.6k545132
answered Mar 18 at 15:27
Y e zY e z
45.4k372203
add a comment |
There is a teshuva of the Binyan Tzion which is often quoted about this issue, in Siman #44.
He explains that the language of שליחות is to indicate that the sending itself is enough, even if the recipient does not end up receiving or accepting the gift (as per the psak of the Rema, O.C. 695):
ולענ"ד טעם המהר"י ברין ורמ"א כמו שכתוב "ומשלוח מנות "
ולא כתיב "ונתון מנות " כמו דכתיב "ומתנות לאביונים ," דלשון
נתינה שייך גבי מנות כדכתיב "ונתן לפנינה וגו' מנות ולחנה יתן
מנה אחת אפים ," מזה נראה דלא הקפיד הכתוב אלא על
השילוח דהיינו שיוצא מן המשלח
He also adds on that we don't find any poskim who say that משלוח מנות specifically require sending, and personal delivery is sufficient, which he sees as support to his claim that the point of שליחות is to indicate that this is all that is required (as opposed to מתנות לאביונים, which he asserts requires the poor person to actually receive and accept it). He does, however, conclude that it may be better to send it via a messenger, though:
ומכ"מ אולי לכתחלה טוב יותר
לשלוח המנות ע"י אחר
edited Mar 18 at 15:59
mbloch
26.6k545132
answered Mar 18 at 15:27
Y e zY e z
45.4k372203
There is a teshuva of the Binyan Tzion which is often quoted about this issue, in Siman #44.
He explains that the language of שליחות is to indicate that the sending itself is enough, even if the recipient does not end up receiving or accepting the gift (as per the psak of the Rema, O.C. 695):
ולענ"ד טעם המהר"י ברין ורמ"א כמו שכתוב "ומשלוח מנות "
ולא כתיב "ונתון מנות " כמו דכתיב "ומתנות לאביונים ," דלשון
נתינה שייך גבי מנות כדכתיב "ונתן לפנינה וגו' מנות ולחנה יתן
מנה אחת אפים ," מזה נראה דלא הקפיד הכתוב אלא על
השילוח דהיינו שיוצא מן המשלח
He also adds on that we don't find any poskim who say that משלוח מנות specifically require sending, and personal delivery is sufficient, which he sees as support to his claim that the point of שליחות is to indicate that this is all that is required (as opposed to מתנות לאביונים, which he asserts requires the poor person to actually receive and accept it). He does, however, conclude that it may be better to send it via a messenger, though:
ומכ"מ אולי לכתחלה טוב יותר
לשלוח המנות ע"י אחר
edited Mar 18 at 15:59
mbloch
26.6k545132
answered Mar 18 at 15:27
Y e zY e z
45.4k372203
edited Mar 18 at 15:59
mbloch
26.6k545132
edited Mar 18 at 15:59
mbloch
26.6k545132
edited Mar 18 at 15:59
mbloch
26.6k545132
26.6k545132
answered Mar 18 at 15:27
Y e zY e z
45.4k372203
answered Mar 18 at 15:27
Y e zY e z
45.4k372203
answered Mar 18 at 15:27
Y e zY e z
45.4k372203
45.4k372203
add a comment |
add a comment |
3
Your examples are all in Piel
– Double AA♦
Mar 18 at 15:47