What is the adequate fee for a reveal operation?How does Tezos manage its mempool?What elliptic curves are used by Tezos?What is the difference between implicit vs originated accounts?How does tezos-client compute a transaction fee?Why a reveal operation?How to manage rewards for small delegators?how to transaction from a KT1 address to another KT1 address?When setting up a contract, what do the fields mean?
How can we expose a lightning web component on a Mobile app?
In what order does sftp fetch files when using "get -r folder"?
Understanding minimizing cost correctly
A Ri-diddley-iley Riddle
Difference between 'dont avoir besoin' and 'en avoir besoin'
Why did it take so long to abandon sail after steamships were demonstrated?
How difficult is it to simply disable/disengage the MCAS on Boeing 737 Max 8 & 9 Aircraft?
Why is there is so much iron?
What exactly is this small puffer fish doing and how did it manage to accomplish such a feat?
centering a caption under a table
T-SQL LIKE Predicate failed to match with whitespace in XML converted varchar
This word with a lot of past tenses
How to define limit operations in general topological spaces? Are nets able to do this?
What is the term when voters “dishonestly” choose something that they do not want to choose?
Why is a white electrical wire connected to 2 black wires?
Can I use USB data pins as a power source?
Is it normal that my co-workers at a fitness company criticize my food choices?
Am I eligible for the Eurail Youth pass? I am 27.5 years old
What is the significance behind "40 days" that often appears in the Bible?
What is signal ground
Does .bashrc contain syntax errors?
Energy of photons of given frequency and number
Is it correct to say "which country do you like the most?"
Why one should not leave fingerprints on bulbs and plugs?
What is the adequate fee for a reveal operation?
How does Tezos manage its mempool?What elliptic curves are used by Tezos?What is the difference between implicit vs originated accounts?How does tezos-client compute a transaction fee?Why a reveal operation?How to manage rewards for small delegators?how to transaction from a KT1 address to another KT1 address?When setting up a contract, what do the fields mean?
When transferring funds to a non-revealed Tezos account, one must pay a "reveal fee".
- What is the optimal value to use for this fee?
- Or is this a fixed amount?
- What would be the adequate fee for a reveal operation?
account transfer reveal fee
edited 24 mins ago
Ezy♦
2,703630
asked 23 hours ago
Luiz MilfontLuiz Milfont
1175
add a comment |
When transferring funds to a non-revealed Tezos account, one must pay a "reveal fee".
- What is the optimal value to use for this fee?
- Or is this a fixed amount?
- What would be the adequate fee for a reveal operation?
account transfer reveal fee
edited 24 mins ago
Ezy♦
2,703630
asked 23 hours ago
Luiz MilfontLuiz Milfont
1175
add a comment |
When transferring funds to a non-revealed Tezos account, one must pay a "reveal fee".
- What is the optimal value to use for this fee?
- Or is this a fixed amount?
- What would be the adequate fee for a reveal operation?
account transfer reveal fee
edited 24 mins ago
Ezy♦
2,703630
asked 23 hours ago
Luiz MilfontLuiz Milfont
1175
When transferring funds to a non-revealed Tezos account, one must pay a "reveal fee".
- What is the optimal value to use for this fee?
- Or is this a fixed amount?
- What would be the adequate fee for a reveal operation?
account transfer reveal fee
account transfer reveal fee
edited 24 mins ago
Ezy♦
2,703630
asked 23 hours ago
Luiz MilfontLuiz Milfont
1175
edited 24 mins ago
Ezy♦
2,703630
asked 23 hours ago
Luiz MilfontLuiz Milfont
1175
edited 24 mins ago
Ezy♦
2,703630
edited 24 mins ago
Ezy♦
2,703630
edited 24 mins ago
Ezy♦
2,703630
2,703630
asked 23 hours ago
Luiz MilfontLuiz Milfont
1175
asked 23 hours ago
Luiz MilfontLuiz Milfont
1175
asked 23 hours ago
Luiz MilfontLuiz Milfont
1175
1175
add a comment |
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
The question as stated confuses different things.
A "reveal" operation is an operation that writes on the chain the public key associated with a public key hash for an implicit account. The fee associated with this operation is up for the sender to decide, though most bakers implement default minimum fees (in this case it is currently 1267µꜩ).
The creation of a new account by sending tokens to an implicit address is not a "reveal" operation as the public key needs not be known in this operation. However, it does trigger the creation of an implicit account on the chain. Storage cost has to be paid, and it is not a part of the transaction fee. It is deducted directly from the account making the transaction, though it is subject to a cap specified by the sender. The default value for the storage cost incurred is indeed 0.257 XTZ.
answered 21 hours ago
Arthur BArthur B
2,386517
1
Thank you both. My intention is, indeed, specify a fee to cover the costs of a creation of a new account when sending tokens to it.
– Luiz Milfont
21 hours ago
add a comment |
The fee for adding a new account to the global state (--burn-cap with tezos-client) is 0.257 XTZ.
The origination burn is calculated as Tez_repr.(cost_per_byte *? (Int64.of_int origination_size)).
cost_per_byte is 0.001 XTZ. It is 1000 mutez and 1,000,000 mutez == 1 tez.
origination_size is 257.
Due to that the resulting cost for an origination of a completely new account is 257,000 mutez or 0.257 tez.
This is defined in proto_alpha/lib_protocol/fee_storage.ml, proto_alpha/lib_protocol/constants_repr.ml, and proto_alpha/lib_protocol/qty_repr.ml
answered 22 hours ago
adrianadrian
5917
1
That's incorrect, the origination burn is not part of the transaction fee.
– Arthur B
21 hours ago
Yes, you are correct. I have edited the above answer to clarify that the fee that I describe there is for adding a new account to the state.
– adrian
21 hours ago
2
I suggest keeping the terminology separate: "Fee" means paid to the baker. "Burn" means destroyed.
– Tom
17 hours ago
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "698"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftezos.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f786%2fwhat-is-the-adequate-fee-for-a-reveal-operation%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
The question as stated confuses different things.
A "reveal" operation is an operation that writes on the chain the public key associated with a public key hash for an implicit account. The fee associated with this operation is up for the sender to decide, though most bakers implement default minimum fees (in this case it is currently 1267µꜩ).
The creation of a new account by sending tokens to an implicit address is not a "reveal" operation as the public key needs not be known in this operation. However, it does trigger the creation of an implicit account on the chain. Storage cost has to be paid, and it is not a part of the transaction fee. It is deducted directly from the account making the transaction, though it is subject to a cap specified by the sender. The default value for the storage cost incurred is indeed 0.257 XTZ.
answered 21 hours ago
Arthur BArthur B
2,386517
1
Thank you both. My intention is, indeed, specify a fee to cover the costs of a creation of a new account when sending tokens to it.
– Luiz Milfont
21 hours ago
add a comment |
The question as stated confuses different things.
A "reveal" operation is an operation that writes on the chain the public key associated with a public key hash for an implicit account. The fee associated with this operation is up for the sender to decide, though most bakers implement default minimum fees (in this case it is currently 1267µꜩ).
The creation of a new account by sending tokens to an implicit address is not a "reveal" operation as the public key needs not be known in this operation. However, it does trigger the creation of an implicit account on the chain. Storage cost has to be paid, and it is not a part of the transaction fee. It is deducted directly from the account making the transaction, though it is subject to a cap specified by the sender. The default value for the storage cost incurred is indeed 0.257 XTZ.
answered 21 hours ago
Arthur BArthur B
2,386517
1
Thank you both. My intention is, indeed, specify a fee to cover the costs of a creation of a new account when sending tokens to it.
– Luiz Milfont
21 hours ago
add a comment |
The question as stated confuses different things.
A "reveal" operation is an operation that writes on the chain the public key associated with a public key hash for an implicit account. The fee associated with this operation is up for the sender to decide, though most bakers implement default minimum fees (in this case it is currently 1267µꜩ).
The creation of a new account by sending tokens to an implicit address is not a "reveal" operation as the public key needs not be known in this operation. However, it does trigger the creation of an implicit account on the chain. Storage cost has to be paid, and it is not a part of the transaction fee. It is deducted directly from the account making the transaction, though it is subject to a cap specified by the sender. The default value for the storage cost incurred is indeed 0.257 XTZ.
answered 21 hours ago
Arthur BArthur B
2,386517
The question as stated confuses different things.
A "reveal" operation is an operation that writes on the chain the public key associated with a public key hash for an implicit account. The fee associated with this operation is up for the sender to decide, though most bakers implement default minimum fees (in this case it is currently 1267µꜩ).
The creation of a new account by sending tokens to an implicit address is not a "reveal" operation as the public key needs not be known in this operation. However, it does trigger the creation of an implicit account on the chain. Storage cost has to be paid, and it is not a part of the transaction fee. It is deducted directly from the account making the transaction, though it is subject to a cap specified by the sender. The default value for the storage cost incurred is indeed 0.257 XTZ.
answered 21 hours ago
Arthur BArthur B
2,386517
edited 20 hours ago
answered 21 hours ago
Arthur BArthur B
2,386517
answered 21 hours ago
Arthur BArthur B
2,386517
answered 21 hours ago
Arthur BArthur B
2,386517
2,386517
1
Thank you both. My intention is, indeed, specify a fee to cover the costs of a creation of a new account when sending tokens to it.
– Luiz Milfont
21 hours ago
add a comment |
1
Thank you both. My intention is, indeed, specify a fee to cover the costs of a creation of a new account when sending tokens to it.
– Luiz Milfont
21 hours ago
1
1
Thank you both. My intention is, indeed, specify a fee to cover the costs of a creation of a new account when sending tokens to it.
– Luiz Milfont
21 hours ago
Thank you both. My intention is, indeed, specify a fee to cover the costs of a creation of a new account when sending tokens to it.
– Luiz Milfont
21 hours ago
add a comment |
The fee for adding a new account to the global state (--burn-cap with tezos-client) is 0.257 XTZ.
The origination burn is calculated as Tez_repr.(cost_per_byte *? (Int64.of_int origination_size)).
cost_per_byte is 0.001 XTZ. It is 1000 mutez and 1,000,000 mutez == 1 tez.
origination_size is 257.
Due to that the resulting cost for an origination of a completely new account is 257,000 mutez or 0.257 tez.
This is defined in proto_alpha/lib_protocol/fee_storage.ml, proto_alpha/lib_protocol/constants_repr.ml, and proto_alpha/lib_protocol/qty_repr.ml
answered 22 hours ago
adrianadrian
5917
1
That's incorrect, the origination burn is not part of the transaction fee.
– Arthur B
21 hours ago
Yes, you are correct. I have edited the above answer to clarify that the fee that I describe there is for adding a new account to the state.
– adrian
21 hours ago
2
I suggest keeping the terminology separate: "Fee" means paid to the baker. "Burn" means destroyed.
– Tom
17 hours ago
add a comment |
The fee for adding a new account to the global state (--burn-cap with tezos-client) is 0.257 XTZ.
The origination burn is calculated as Tez_repr.(cost_per_byte *? (Int64.of_int origination_size)).
cost_per_byte is 0.001 XTZ. It is 1000 mutez and 1,000,000 mutez == 1 tez.
origination_size is 257.
Due to that the resulting cost for an origination of a completely new account is 257,000 mutez or 0.257 tez.
This is defined in proto_alpha/lib_protocol/fee_storage.ml, proto_alpha/lib_protocol/constants_repr.ml, and proto_alpha/lib_protocol/qty_repr.ml
answered 22 hours ago
adrianadrian
5917
1
That's incorrect, the origination burn is not part of the transaction fee.
– Arthur B
21 hours ago
Yes, you are correct. I have edited the above answer to clarify that the fee that I describe there is for adding a new account to the state.
– adrian
21 hours ago
2
I suggest keeping the terminology separate: "Fee" means paid to the baker. "Burn" means destroyed.
– Tom
17 hours ago
add a comment |
The fee for adding a new account to the global state (--burn-cap with tezos-client) is 0.257 XTZ.
The origination burn is calculated as Tez_repr.(cost_per_byte *? (Int64.of_int origination_size)).
cost_per_byte is 0.001 XTZ. It is 1000 mutez and 1,000,000 mutez == 1 tez.
origination_size is 257.
Due to that the resulting cost for an origination of a completely new account is 257,000 mutez or 0.257 tez.
This is defined in proto_alpha/lib_protocol/fee_storage.ml, proto_alpha/lib_protocol/constants_repr.ml, and proto_alpha/lib_protocol/qty_repr.ml
answered 22 hours ago
adrianadrian
5917
The fee for adding a new account to the global state (--burn-cap with tezos-client) is 0.257 XTZ.
The origination burn is calculated as Tez_repr.(cost_per_byte *? (Int64.of_int origination_size)).
cost_per_byte is 0.001 XTZ. It is 1000 mutez and 1,000,000 mutez == 1 tez.
origination_size is 257.
Due to that the resulting cost for an origination of a completely new account is 257,000 mutez or 0.257 tez.
This is defined in proto_alpha/lib_protocol/fee_storage.ml, proto_alpha/lib_protocol/constants_repr.ml, and proto_alpha/lib_protocol/qty_repr.ml
answered 22 hours ago
adrianadrian
5917
edited 21 hours ago
answered 22 hours ago
adrianadrian
5917
answered 22 hours ago
adrianadrian
5917
answered 22 hours ago
adrianadrian
5917
5917
1
That's incorrect, the origination burn is not part of the transaction fee.
– Arthur B
21 hours ago
Yes, you are correct. I have edited the above answer to clarify that the fee that I describe there is for adding a new account to the state.
– adrian
21 hours ago
2
I suggest keeping the terminology separate: "Fee" means paid to the baker. "Burn" means destroyed.
– Tom
17 hours ago
add a comment |
1
That's incorrect, the origination burn is not part of the transaction fee.
– Arthur B
21 hours ago
Yes, you are correct. I have edited the above answer to clarify that the fee that I describe there is for adding a new account to the state.
– adrian
21 hours ago
2
I suggest keeping the terminology separate: "Fee" means paid to the baker. "Burn" means destroyed.
– Tom
17 hours ago
1
1
That's incorrect, the origination burn is not part of the transaction fee.
– Arthur B
21 hours ago
That's incorrect, the origination burn is not part of the transaction fee.
– Arthur B
21 hours ago
Yes, you are correct. I have edited the above answer to clarify that the fee that I describe there is for adding a new account to the state.
– adrian
21 hours ago
Yes, you are correct. I have edited the above answer to clarify that the fee that I describe there is for adding a new account to the state.
– adrian
21 hours ago
2
2
I suggest keeping the terminology separate: "Fee" means paid to the baker. "Burn" means destroyed.
– Tom
17 hours ago
I suggest keeping the terminology separate: "Fee" means paid to the baker. "Burn" means destroyed.
– Tom
17 hours ago
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Tezos Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftezos.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f786%2fwhat-is-the-adequate-fee-for-a-reveal-operation%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
