What's the difference between “He's going to fly tomorrow”, “He's flying tomorrow” and “He flies...





.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty{
margin-bottom:0;
}








1

















Let consider that someone will take a flight tomorrow with a plan of course. In this case, we can use He's going to fly tomorrow in Simple Future.



How ever, I've learnt that we can also use Present Continues to represent this situation in future too. So we're allowed to use He's flying tomorrow.



On other hand, I also learnt that Simple Present can be used to represent an action in future too. So He flies tomorrow is correct too.



So my question is this:




  • What is the difference between them? are they exactly same?

  • When should we use which one?










share|improve this question


















closed as off-topic by Jason Bassford, JJJ, Chappo, jimm101, Mari-Lou A Jun 3 at 8:26



  • This question does not appear to be about English language and usage within the scope defined in the help center.

If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.













  • 2





    All work, just depending on context.

    – Xanne
    May 28 at 10:10











  • @Xanne How it depends actually?

    – Amirreza Nasiri
    May 28 at 10:16











  • I believe that your question is a possible duplicate of Differences between ways to express future actions Hopefully the answers there will help you. See also this answer by one of our best contributors.

    – Mari-Lou A
    Jun 3 at 8:26




















1

















Let consider that someone will take a flight tomorrow with a plan of course. In this case, we can use He's going to fly tomorrow in Simple Future.



How ever, I've learnt that we can also use Present Continues to represent this situation in future too. So we're allowed to use He's flying tomorrow.



On other hand, I also learnt that Simple Present can be used to represent an action in future too. So He flies tomorrow is correct too.



So my question is this:




  • What is the difference between them? are they exactly same?

  • When should we use which one?










share|improve this question


















closed as off-topic by Jason Bassford, JJJ, Chappo, jimm101, Mari-Lou A Jun 3 at 8:26



  • This question does not appear to be about English language and usage within the scope defined in the help center.

If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.













  • 2





    All work, just depending on context.

    – Xanne
    May 28 at 10:10











  • @Xanne How it depends actually?

    – Amirreza Nasiri
    May 28 at 10:16











  • I believe that your question is a possible duplicate of Differences between ways to express future actions Hopefully the answers there will help you. See also this answer by one of our best contributors.

    – Mari-Lou A
    Jun 3 at 8:26
















1












1








1








Let consider that someone will take a flight tomorrow with a plan of course. In this case, we can use He's going to fly tomorrow in Simple Future.



How ever, I've learnt that we can also use Present Continues to represent this situation in future too. So we're allowed to use He's flying tomorrow.



On other hand, I also learnt that Simple Present can be used to represent an action in future too. So He flies tomorrow is correct too.



So my question is this:




  • What is the difference between them? are they exactly same?

  • When should we use which one?










share|improve this question
















Let consider that someone will take a flight tomorrow with a plan of course. In this case, we can use He's going to fly tomorrow in Simple Future.



How ever, I've learnt that we can also use Present Continues to represent this situation in future too. So we're allowed to use He's flying tomorrow.



On other hand, I also learnt that Simple Present can be used to represent an action in future too. So He flies tomorrow is correct too.



So my question is this:




  • What is the difference between them? are they exactly same?

  • When should we use which one?







present-tense future present-continuous simple-future






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question



share|improve this question








edited May 28 at 10:04







Amirreza Nasiri

















asked May 28 at 9:43









Amirreza NasiriAmirreza Nasiri

3533 gold badges7 silver badges17 bronze badges




3533 gold badges7 silver badges17 bronze badges





closed as off-topic by Jason Bassford, JJJ, Chappo, jimm101, Mari-Lou A Jun 3 at 8:26



  • This question does not appear to be about English language and usage within the scope defined in the help center.

If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.









closed as off-topic by Jason Bassford, JJJ, Chappo, jimm101, Mari-Lou A Jun 3 at 8:26



  • This question does not appear to be about English language and usage within the scope defined in the help center.

If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.







closed as off-topic by Jason Bassford, JJJ, Chappo, jimm101, Mari-Lou A Jun 3 at 8:26



  • This question does not appear to be about English language and usage within the scope defined in the help center.

If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.








  • 2





    All work, just depending on context.

    – Xanne
    May 28 at 10:10











  • @Xanne How it depends actually?

    – Amirreza Nasiri
    May 28 at 10:16











  • I believe that your question is a possible duplicate of Differences between ways to express future actions Hopefully the answers there will help you. See also this answer by one of our best contributors.

    – Mari-Lou A
    Jun 3 at 8:26
















  • 2





    All work, just depending on context.

    – Xanne
    May 28 at 10:10











  • @Xanne How it depends actually?

    – Amirreza Nasiri
    May 28 at 10:16











  • I believe that your question is a possible duplicate of Differences between ways to express future actions Hopefully the answers there will help you. See also this answer by one of our best contributors.

    – Mari-Lou A
    Jun 3 at 8:26










2




2





All work, just depending on context.

– Xanne
May 28 at 10:10





All work, just depending on context.

– Xanne
May 28 at 10:10













@Xanne How it depends actually?

– Amirreza Nasiri
May 28 at 10:16





@Xanne How it depends actually?

– Amirreza Nasiri
May 28 at 10:16













I believe that your question is a possible duplicate of Differences between ways to express future actions Hopefully the answers there will help you. See also this answer by one of our best contributors.

– Mari-Lou A
Jun 3 at 8:26







I believe that your question is a possible duplicate of Differences between ways to express future actions Hopefully the answers there will help you. See also this answer by one of our best contributors.

– Mari-Lou A
Jun 3 at 8:26












1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















2


















They all mean the same thing but there is a bit of difference in the way that they are used.



The most general, and the most widely used, is "He's going to fly tomorrow". This can be used with no background, for example "My son needs a flight bag quickly, he's going to fly tomorrow": alhough it can also be used with background, for example "My son is going to Australia." "Oh, when does he go?" "He's going to fly tomorrow."



The next most common form is "He's flying tomorrow". This would nearly always be used with background, for instance "My son is going to Australia." "Oh, when does he go?" "He's flying tomorrow". It would be grammatically correct to use it without background ("My son needs a flight bag quickly, he's flying tomorrow") but might sound a bit odd because you haven't said where he's going.



The least common form, partly because it's more formal and in some ways a bit dated, is "He flies tomorrow". If you said "My son needs a flight bag quickly, he flies tomorrow." it would be correct but would sound a bit odd and, probably, pretentious. It would be more likely to be used in more formal, significant or dramatic situations. For example "My son is going to Australia to negotiate a 500 million dollar deal, he flies tomorrow."



If you are in any doubt use "He's going to fly tomorrow", I can't think of any circumstance where it would sound wrong. The one to be most careful with is "He flies tomorrow." as it can be inappropriate.






share|improve this answer


































    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes








    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    2


















    They all mean the same thing but there is a bit of difference in the way that they are used.



    The most general, and the most widely used, is "He's going to fly tomorrow". This can be used with no background, for example "My son needs a flight bag quickly, he's going to fly tomorrow": alhough it can also be used with background, for example "My son is going to Australia." "Oh, when does he go?" "He's going to fly tomorrow."



    The next most common form is "He's flying tomorrow". This would nearly always be used with background, for instance "My son is going to Australia." "Oh, when does he go?" "He's flying tomorrow". It would be grammatically correct to use it without background ("My son needs a flight bag quickly, he's flying tomorrow") but might sound a bit odd because you haven't said where he's going.



    The least common form, partly because it's more formal and in some ways a bit dated, is "He flies tomorrow". If you said "My son needs a flight bag quickly, he flies tomorrow." it would be correct but would sound a bit odd and, probably, pretentious. It would be more likely to be used in more formal, significant or dramatic situations. For example "My son is going to Australia to negotiate a 500 million dollar deal, he flies tomorrow."



    If you are in any doubt use "He's going to fly tomorrow", I can't think of any circumstance where it would sound wrong. The one to be most careful with is "He flies tomorrow." as it can be inappropriate.






    share|improve this answer































      2


















      They all mean the same thing but there is a bit of difference in the way that they are used.



      The most general, and the most widely used, is "He's going to fly tomorrow". This can be used with no background, for example "My son needs a flight bag quickly, he's going to fly tomorrow": alhough it can also be used with background, for example "My son is going to Australia." "Oh, when does he go?" "He's going to fly tomorrow."



      The next most common form is "He's flying tomorrow". This would nearly always be used with background, for instance "My son is going to Australia." "Oh, when does he go?" "He's flying tomorrow". It would be grammatically correct to use it without background ("My son needs a flight bag quickly, he's flying tomorrow") but might sound a bit odd because you haven't said where he's going.



      The least common form, partly because it's more formal and in some ways a bit dated, is "He flies tomorrow". If you said "My son needs a flight bag quickly, he flies tomorrow." it would be correct but would sound a bit odd and, probably, pretentious. It would be more likely to be used in more formal, significant or dramatic situations. For example "My son is going to Australia to negotiate a 500 million dollar deal, he flies tomorrow."



      If you are in any doubt use "He's going to fly tomorrow", I can't think of any circumstance where it would sound wrong. The one to be most careful with is "He flies tomorrow." as it can be inappropriate.






      share|improve this answer





























        2














        2










        2









        They all mean the same thing but there is a bit of difference in the way that they are used.



        The most general, and the most widely used, is "He's going to fly tomorrow". This can be used with no background, for example "My son needs a flight bag quickly, he's going to fly tomorrow": alhough it can also be used with background, for example "My son is going to Australia." "Oh, when does he go?" "He's going to fly tomorrow."



        The next most common form is "He's flying tomorrow". This would nearly always be used with background, for instance "My son is going to Australia." "Oh, when does he go?" "He's flying tomorrow". It would be grammatically correct to use it without background ("My son needs a flight bag quickly, he's flying tomorrow") but might sound a bit odd because you haven't said where he's going.



        The least common form, partly because it's more formal and in some ways a bit dated, is "He flies tomorrow". If you said "My son needs a flight bag quickly, he flies tomorrow." it would be correct but would sound a bit odd and, probably, pretentious. It would be more likely to be used in more formal, significant or dramatic situations. For example "My son is going to Australia to negotiate a 500 million dollar deal, he flies tomorrow."



        If you are in any doubt use "He's going to fly tomorrow", I can't think of any circumstance where it would sound wrong. The one to be most careful with is "He flies tomorrow." as it can be inappropriate.






        share|improve this answer














        They all mean the same thing but there is a bit of difference in the way that they are used.



        The most general, and the most widely used, is "He's going to fly tomorrow". This can be used with no background, for example "My son needs a flight bag quickly, he's going to fly tomorrow": alhough it can also be used with background, for example "My son is going to Australia." "Oh, when does he go?" "He's going to fly tomorrow."



        The next most common form is "He's flying tomorrow". This would nearly always be used with background, for instance "My son is going to Australia." "Oh, when does he go?" "He's flying tomorrow". It would be grammatically correct to use it without background ("My son needs a flight bag quickly, he's flying tomorrow") but might sound a bit odd because you haven't said where he's going.



        The least common form, partly because it's more formal and in some ways a bit dated, is "He flies tomorrow". If you said "My son needs a flight bag quickly, he flies tomorrow." it would be correct but would sound a bit odd and, probably, pretentious. It would be more likely to be used in more formal, significant or dramatic situations. For example "My son is going to Australia to negotiate a 500 million dollar deal, he flies tomorrow."



        If you are in any doubt use "He's going to fly tomorrow", I can't think of any circumstance where it would sound wrong. The one to be most careful with is "He flies tomorrow." as it can be inappropriate.







        share|improve this answer













        share|improve this answer




        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer










        answered May 28 at 10:24









        BoldBenBoldBen

        8,90415 silver badges25 bronze badges




        8,90415 silver badges25 bronze badges


















            Popular posts from this blog

            Færeyskur hestur Heimild | Tengill | Tilvísanir | LeiðsagnarvalRossið - síða um færeyska hrossið á færeyskuGott ár hjá færeyska hestinum

            He _____ here since 1970 . Answer needed [closed]What does “since he was so high” mean?Meaning of “catch birds for”?How do I ensure “since” takes the meaning I want?“Who cares here” meaningWhat does “right round toward” mean?the time tense (had now been detected)What does the phrase “ring around the roses” mean here?Correct usage of “visited upon”Meaning of “foiled rail sabotage bid”It was the third time I had gone to Rome or It is the third time I had been to Rome

            Slayer Innehåll Historia | Stil, komposition och lyrik | Bandets betydelse och framgångar | Sidoprojekt och samarbeten | Kontroverser | Medlemmar | Utmärkelser och nomineringar | Turnéer och festivaler | Diskografi | Referenser | Externa länkar | Navigeringsmenywww.slayer.net”Metal Massacre vol. 1””Metal Massacre vol. 3””Metal Massacre Volume III””Show No Mercy””Haunting the Chapel””Live Undead””Hell Awaits””Reign in Blood””Reign in Blood””Gold & Platinum – Reign in Blood””Golden Gods Awards Winners”originalet”Kerrang! Hall Of Fame””Slayer Looks Back On 37-Year Career In New Video Series: Part Two””South of Heaven””Gold & Platinum – South of Heaven””Seasons in the Abyss””Gold & Platinum - Seasons in the Abyss””Divine Intervention””Divine Intervention - Release group by Slayer””Gold & Platinum - Divine Intervention””Live Intrusion””Undisputed Attitude””Abolish Government/Superficial Love””Release “Slatanic Slaughter: A Tribute to Slayer” by Various Artists””Diabolus in Musica””Soundtrack to the Apocalypse””God Hates Us All””Systematic - Relationships””War at the Warfield””Gold & Platinum - War at the Warfield””Soundtrack to the Apocalypse””Gold & Platinum - Still Reigning””Metallica, Slayer, Iron Mauden Among Winners At Metal Hammer Awards””Eternal Pyre””Eternal Pyre - Slayer release group””Eternal Pyre””Metal Storm Awards 2006””Kerrang! Hall Of Fame””Slayer Wins 'Best Metal' Grammy Award””Slayer Guitarist Jeff Hanneman Dies””Bullet-For My Valentine booed at Metal Hammer Golden Gods Awards””Unholy Aliance””The End Of Slayer?””Slayer: We Could Thrash Out Two More Albums If We're Fast Enough...””'The Unholy Alliance: Chapter III' UK Dates Added”originalet”Megadeth And Slayer To Co-Headline 'Canadian Carnage' Trek”originalet”World Painted Blood””Release “World Painted Blood” by Slayer””Metallica Heading To Cinemas””Slayer, Megadeth To Join Forces For 'European Carnage' Tour - Dec. 18, 2010”originalet”Slayer's Hanneman Contracts Acute Infection; Band To Bring In Guest Guitarist””Cannibal Corpse's Pat O'Brien Will Step In As Slayer's Guest Guitarist”originalet”Slayer’s Jeff Hanneman Dead at 49””Dave Lombardo Says He Made Only $67,000 In 2011 While Touring With Slayer””Slayer: We Do Not Agree With Dave Lombardo's Substance Or Timeline Of Events””Slayer Welcomes Drummer Paul Bostaph Back To The Fold””Slayer Hope to Unveil Never-Before-Heard Jeff Hanneman Material on Next Album””Slayer Debut New Song 'Implode' During Surprise Golden Gods Appearance””Release group Repentless by Slayer””Repentless - Slayer - Credits””Slayer””Metal Storm Awards 2015””Slayer - to release comic book "Repentless #1"””Slayer To Release 'Repentless' 6.66" Vinyl Box Set””BREAKING NEWS: Slayer Announce Farewell Tour””Slayer Recruit Lamb of God, Anthrax, Behemoth + Testament for Final Tour””Slayer lägger ner efter 37 år””Slayer Announces Second North American Leg Of 'Final' Tour””Final World Tour””Slayer Announces Final European Tour With Lamb of God, Anthrax And Obituary””Slayer To Tour Europe With Lamb of God, Anthrax And Obituary””Slayer To Play 'Last French Show Ever' At Next Year's Hellfst””Slayer's Final World Tour Will Extend Into 2019””Death Angel's Rob Cavestany On Slayer's 'Farewell' Tour: 'Some Of Us Could See This Coming'””Testament Has No Plans To Retire Anytime Soon, Says Chuck Billy””Anthrax's Scott Ian On Slayer's 'Farewell' Tour Plans: 'I Was Surprised And I Wasn't Surprised'””Slayer””Slayer's Morbid Schlock””Review/Rock; For Slayer, the Mania Is the Message””Slayer - Biography””Slayer - Reign In Blood”originalet”Dave Lombardo””An exclusive oral history of Slayer”originalet”Exclusive! Interview With Slayer Guitarist Jeff Hanneman”originalet”Thinking Out Loud: Slayer's Kerry King on hair metal, Satan and being polite””Slayer Lyrics””Slayer - Biography””Most influential artists for extreme metal music””Slayer - Reign in Blood””Slayer guitarist Jeff Hanneman dies aged 49””Slatanic Slaughter: A Tribute to Slayer””Gateway to Hell: A Tribute to Slayer””Covered In Blood””Slayer: The Origins of Thrash in San Francisco, CA.””Why They Rule - #6 Slayer”originalet”Guitar World's 100 Greatest Heavy Metal Guitarists Of All Time”originalet”The fans have spoken: Slayer comes out on top in readers' polls”originalet”Tribute to Jeff Hanneman (1964-2013)””Lamb Of God Frontman: We Sound Like A Slayer Rip-Off””BEHEMOTH Frontman Pays Tribute To SLAYER's JEFF HANNEMAN””Slayer, Hatebreed Doing Double Duty On This Year's Ozzfest””System of a Down””Lacuna Coil’s Andrea Ferro Talks Influences, Skateboarding, Band Origins + More””Slayer - Reign in Blood””Into The Lungs of Hell””Slayer rules - en utställning om fans””Slayer and Their Fans Slashed Through a No-Holds-Barred Night at Gas Monkey””Home””Slayer””Gold & Platinum - The Big 4 Live from Sofia, Bulgaria””Exclusive! Interview With Slayer Guitarist Kerry King””2008-02-23: Wiltern, Los Angeles, CA, USA””Slayer's Kerry King To Perform With Megadeth Tonight! - Oct. 21, 2010”originalet”Dave Lombardo - Biography”Slayer Case DismissedArkiveradUltimate Classic Rock: Slayer guitarist Jeff Hanneman dead at 49.”Slayer: "We could never do any thing like Some Kind Of Monster..."””Cannibal Corpse'S Pat O'Brien Will Step In As Slayer'S Guest Guitarist | The Official Slayer Site”originalet”Slayer Wins 'Best Metal' Grammy Award””Slayer Guitarist Jeff Hanneman Dies””Kerrang! Awards 2006 Blog: Kerrang! Hall Of Fame””Kerrang! Awards 2013: Kerrang! Legend”originalet”Metallica, Slayer, Iron Maien Among Winners At Metal Hammer Awards””Metal Hammer Golden Gods Awards””Bullet For My Valentine Booed At Metal Hammer Golden Gods Awards””Metal Storm Awards 2006””Metal Storm Awards 2015””Slayer's Concert History””Slayer - Relationships””Slayer - Releases”Slayers officiella webbplatsSlayer på MusicBrainzOfficiell webbplatsSlayerSlayerr1373445760000 0001 1540 47353068615-5086262726cb13906545x(data)6033143kn20030215029