Embeddings of flag manifoldsDo symmetric spaces admit isometric embeddings as intersections of quadrics?Riemannian metric on a flag varietyEquivariant Almost Complex Structures on the Full Flag ManifoldsIs there a complex surface into which every Riemann surface embeds?Is there an algebraic way to characterise the ordinary integral flags?When is the determinant an $8$-th power?Topological Invariance of Chow VarietiesDegree of the projection of a projective varietyThe isometry groups of flag manifoldsDegree of Varieties and Segre's Embedding
Embeddings of flag manifolds
Do symmetric spaces admit isometric embeddings as intersections of quadrics?Riemannian metric on a flag varietyEquivariant Almost Complex Structures on the Full Flag ManifoldsIs there a complex surface into which every Riemann surface embeds?Is there an algebraic way to characterise the ordinary integral flags?When is the determinant an $8$-th power?Topological Invariance of Chow VarietiesDegree of the projection of a projective varietyThe isometry groups of flag manifoldsDegree of Varieties and Segre's Embedding
$begingroup$
Consider the flag manifold $mathbbF(a_1,dots,a_k)$ parametrizing flags of type $F^a_1subseteqdotssubseteq F^a_ksubseteq V$ in a vector spaces $V$ of dimension $n+1$, where $F^a_i$ is a sub-vector space of dimension $a_i$.
Then $mathbbF(a_1,dots,a_k)$ embeds in the product of Grassmannians $G(a_1,V)timesdotstimes G(a_k,V)$ which in turn embeds in $mathbbP^N_1timesdotstimesmathbbP^N_k$ via the product of the Plücker embeddings. Now we can embed $mathbbP^N_1timesdotstimesmathbbP^N_k$ in a projective space $mathbbP^N$ via the Segre embedding.
Finally, we get an embedding $mathbbF(a_1,dots,a_k)hookrightarrowmathbbP^N$. Is this embedding the minimal rational homogeneous embedding of $mathbbF(a_1,dots,a_k)$?
ag.algebraic-geometry projective-geometry homogeneous-spaces flag-varieties embeddings
edited yesterday
Michael Albanese
7,71655293
asked yesterday
gxggxg
1538
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Consider the flag manifold $mathbbF(a_1,dots,a_k)$ parametrizing flags of type $F^a_1subseteqdotssubseteq F^a_ksubseteq V$ in a vector spaces $V$ of dimension $n+1$, where $F^a_i$ is a sub-vector space of dimension $a_i$.
Then $mathbbF(a_1,dots,a_k)$ embeds in the product of Grassmannians $G(a_1,V)timesdotstimes G(a_k,V)$ which in turn embeds in $mathbbP^N_1timesdotstimesmathbbP^N_k$ via the product of the Plücker embeddings. Now we can embed $mathbbP^N_1timesdotstimesmathbbP^N_k$ in a projective space $mathbbP^N$ via the Segre embedding.
Finally, we get an embedding $mathbbF(a_1,dots,a_k)hookrightarrowmathbbP^N$. Is this embedding the minimal rational homogeneous embedding of $mathbbF(a_1,dots,a_k)$?
ag.algebraic-geometry projective-geometry homogeneous-spaces flag-varieties embeddings
edited yesterday
Michael Albanese
7,71655293
asked yesterday
gxggxg
1538
$endgroup$
2
$begingroup$
What @VictorPetrov writes is completely correct. I just want to clarify one point. When you write "minimal", do you mean that the dimension of the projective space is minimal, or do you mean that the ample cone is the translate of the nef cone by the divisor class of this embedding (the embedding is the "vertex" of the ample cone)?
$endgroup$
– Jason Starr
yesterday
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Consider the flag manifold $mathbbF(a_1,dots,a_k)$ parametrizing flags of type $F^a_1subseteqdotssubseteq F^a_ksubseteq V$ in a vector spaces $V$ of dimension $n+1$, where $F^a_i$ is a sub-vector space of dimension $a_i$.
Then $mathbbF(a_1,dots,a_k)$ embeds in the product of Grassmannians $G(a_1,V)timesdotstimes G(a_k,V)$ which in turn embeds in $mathbbP^N_1timesdotstimesmathbbP^N_k$ via the product of the Plücker embeddings. Now we can embed $mathbbP^N_1timesdotstimesmathbbP^N_k$ in a projective space $mathbbP^N$ via the Segre embedding.
Finally, we get an embedding $mathbbF(a_1,dots,a_k)hookrightarrowmathbbP^N$. Is this embedding the minimal rational homogeneous embedding of $mathbbF(a_1,dots,a_k)$?
ag.algebraic-geometry projective-geometry homogeneous-spaces flag-varieties embeddings
edited yesterday
Michael Albanese
7,71655293
asked yesterday
gxggxg
1538
$endgroup$
Consider the flag manifold $mathbbF(a_1,dots,a_k)$ parametrizing flags of type $F^a_1subseteqdotssubseteq F^a_ksubseteq V$ in a vector spaces $V$ of dimension $n+1$, where $F^a_i$ is a sub-vector space of dimension $a_i$.
Then $mathbbF(a_1,dots,a_k)$ embeds in the product of Grassmannians $G(a_1,V)timesdotstimes G(a_k,V)$ which in turn embeds in $mathbbP^N_1timesdotstimesmathbbP^N_k$ via the product of the Plücker embeddings. Now we can embed $mathbbP^N_1timesdotstimesmathbbP^N_k$ in a projective space $mathbbP^N$ via the Segre embedding.
Finally, we get an embedding $mathbbF(a_1,dots,a_k)hookrightarrowmathbbP^N$. Is this embedding the minimal rational homogeneous embedding of $mathbbF(a_1,dots,a_k)$?
ag.algebraic-geometry projective-geometry homogeneous-spaces flag-varieties embeddings
ag.algebraic-geometry projective-geometry homogeneous-spaces flag-varieties embeddings
edited yesterday
Michael Albanese
7,71655293
asked yesterday
gxggxg
1538
edited yesterday
Michael Albanese
7,71655293
asked yesterday
gxggxg
1538
edited yesterday
Michael Albanese
7,71655293
edited yesterday
Michael Albanese
7,71655293
edited yesterday
Michael Albanese
7,71655293
7,71655293
asked yesterday
gxggxg
1538
asked yesterday
gxggxg
1538
asked yesterday
gxggxg
1538
1538
2
$begingroup$
What @VictorPetrov writes is completely correct. I just want to clarify one point. When you write "minimal", do you mean that the dimension of the projective space is minimal, or do you mean that the ample cone is the translate of the nef cone by the divisor class of this embedding (the embedding is the "vertex" of the ample cone)?
$endgroup$
– Jason Starr
yesterday
add a comment |
2
$begingroup$
What @VictorPetrov writes is completely correct. I just want to clarify one point. When you write "minimal", do you mean that the dimension of the projective space is minimal, or do you mean that the ample cone is the translate of the nef cone by the divisor class of this embedding (the embedding is the "vertex" of the ample cone)?
$endgroup$
– Jason Starr
yesterday
2
2
$begingroup$
What @VictorPetrov writes is completely correct. I just want to clarify one point. When you write "minimal", do you mean that the dimension of the projective space is minimal, or do you mean that the ample cone is the translate of the nef cone by the divisor class of this embedding (the embedding is the "vertex" of the ample cone)?
$endgroup$
– Jason Starr
yesterday
$begingroup$
What @VictorPetrov writes is completely correct. I just want to clarify one point. When you write "minimal", do you mean that the dimension of the projective space is minimal, or do you mean that the ample cone is the translate of the nef cone by the divisor class of this embedding (the embedding is the "vertex" of the ample cone)?
$endgroup$
– Jason Starr
yesterday
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
In general there is a more efficient way: $a_1,ldots,a_k$ determines a Young diagram, and you can realize the flag variety as the stabilizer of a point in the unique closed orbit of $mathbb P(U)$, where $U$ is the representation of $GL(V)$ corresponding to this diagram. Its dimension is given by the "hook formula".
answered yesterday
Victor PetrovVictor Petrov
1,23968
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
);
);
, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "504"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmathoverflow.net%2fquestions%2f325605%2fembeddings-of-flag-manifolds%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
In general there is a more efficient way: $a_1,ldots,a_k$ determines a Young diagram, and you can realize the flag variety as the stabilizer of a point in the unique closed orbit of $mathbb P(U)$, where $U$ is the representation of $GL(V)$ corresponding to this diagram. Its dimension is given by the "hook formula".
answered yesterday
Victor PetrovVictor Petrov
1,23968
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
In general there is a more efficient way: $a_1,ldots,a_k$ determines a Young diagram, and you can realize the flag variety as the stabilizer of a point in the unique closed orbit of $mathbb P(U)$, where $U$ is the representation of $GL(V)$ corresponding to this diagram. Its dimension is given by the "hook formula".
answered yesterday
Victor PetrovVictor Petrov
1,23968
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
In general there is a more efficient way: $a_1,ldots,a_k$ determines a Young diagram, and you can realize the flag variety as the stabilizer of a point in the unique closed orbit of $mathbb P(U)$, where $U$ is the representation of $GL(V)$ corresponding to this diagram. Its dimension is given by the "hook formula".
answered yesterday
Victor PetrovVictor Petrov
1,23968
$endgroup$
In general there is a more efficient way: $a_1,ldots,a_k$ determines a Young diagram, and you can realize the flag variety as the stabilizer of a point in the unique closed orbit of $mathbb P(U)$, where $U$ is the representation of $GL(V)$ corresponding to this diagram. Its dimension is given by the "hook formula".
answered yesterday
Victor PetrovVictor Petrov
1,23968
answered yesterday
Victor PetrovVictor Petrov
1,23968
answered yesterday
Victor PetrovVictor Petrov
1,23968
answered yesterday
Victor PetrovVictor Petrov
1,23968
1,23968
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to MathOverflow!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmathoverflow.net%2fquestions%2f325605%2fembeddings-of-flag-manifolds%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
2
$begingroup$
What @VictorPetrov writes is completely correct. I just want to clarify one point. When you write "minimal", do you mean that the dimension of the projective space is minimal, or do you mean that the ample cone is the translate of the nef cone by the divisor class of this embedding (the embedding is the "vertex" of the ample cone)?
$endgroup$
– Jason Starr
yesterday