Non-trivial topology where only open sets are closedExhaustion of open sets by closed setsNatural non-trivial topology on $mathbb R$ such that there are more than $2^mathbb N$ open setswhy use open interval rather than closed interval as open sets for real line topologyA non-trivial Hausdorff topology on XClosed sets in Noetherian topologyIn the finite complement topology on $mathbbR$, is the subset $ x $ closed?Are closed sets in topology?For which topologies are the concepts of open and closed “interchangeable”?How to determine which sets are open in a topology?Inclusion of open sets in closed sets of Zariski topology
Improve appearance of matrices as arrow labels in tikz-cd
What kind of footwear is suitable for walking in micro gravity environment?
Does convergence of polynomials imply that of its coefficients?
How can an organ that provides biological immortality be unable to regenerate?
Inhabiting Mars versus going straight for a Dyson swarm
Exit shell with shortcut (not typing exit) that closes session properly
Unfrosted light bulb
Why is "la Gestapo" feminine?
Pre-Employment Background Check With Consent For Future Checks
What will the french man say?
PTIJ: Which Dr. Seuss books should one obtain?
Air travel with refrigerated insulin
TDE Master Key Rotation
The English Debate
is this saw blade faulty?
Make the largest box from a cardboard sheet
Mishloach Manot - why the word Mishloach is used specifically
How can I query the supported timezones in Apex?
Does fire aspect on a sword, destroy mob drops?
Why are there no stars visible in cislunar space?
What is the difference between something being completely legal and being completely decriminalized?
CLI: Get information Ubuntu releases
Do I need an EFI partition for each 18.04 ubuntu I have on my HD?
What is the reasoning behind standardization (dividing by standard deviation)?
Non-trivial topology where only open sets are closed
Exhaustion of open sets by closed setsNatural non-trivial topology on $mathbb R$ such that there are more than $2^mathbb N$ open setswhy use open interval rather than closed interval as open sets for real line topologyA non-trivial Hausdorff topology on XClosed sets in Noetherian topologyIn the finite complement topology on $mathbbR$, is the subset $ x $ closed?Are closed sets in topology?For which topologies are the concepts of open and closed “interchangeable”?How to determine which sets are open in a topology?Inclusion of open sets in closed sets of Zariski topology
$begingroup$
For example, on $mathbbR$ there exists trivial topology which contains only $mathbbR$ and $emptyset$ and in that topology all open sets are closed and all closed sets are open.
Question. Does there exist non-trivial topology on $mathbbR$ for which all open sets are closed and all closed sets are open? Further, given some general set $X$ whose number of elements is finite, could we always construct non-trivial topology where all open sets are closed and all closed sets are open? What if $X$ has a non-finite number of elements?
I hope my question is not meaningless.
Thank you for any help.
general-topology
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
For example, on $mathbbR$ there exists trivial topology which contains only $mathbbR$ and $emptyset$ and in that topology all open sets are closed and all closed sets are open.
Question. Does there exist non-trivial topology on $mathbbR$ for which all open sets are closed and all closed sets are open? Further, given some general set $X$ whose number of elements is finite, could we always construct non-trivial topology where all open sets are closed and all closed sets are open? What if $X$ has a non-finite number of elements?
I hope my question is not meaningless.
Thank you for any help.
general-topology
$endgroup$
2
$begingroup$
The trivial topology on a set $X$ is $emptyset, X$. The discrete topology on a set $X$ is $2^X$. Both have the property that you are looking for, though I am not sure if you are using the term "trivial" here in reference to the trivial topology or just to mean "simple".
$endgroup$
– parsiad
yesterday
2
$begingroup$
(1) The discrete topology, where all subsets are open and closed. (2) Given any partition $X_i_iin Iof $X$, take as a topology the colleciton of all sets that are unions of elements of the partition; the complements are also unions of elements of the partition. This works for any set, regardless of cardinality, and any partition, regarless of size of the partition or of its constituent sets.
$endgroup$
– Arturo Magidin
yesterday
2
$begingroup$
Related to your question are door spaces and extremally disconnected spaces.
$endgroup$
– William Elliot
yesterday
$begingroup$
As noted in the answers, the spaces you are asking about are effectively discrete. The extremally disconnected spaces (spaces such that the closure of any open set is open) suggested by @WilliamElliot can be much more interesting.
$endgroup$
– tomasz
yesterday
add a comment |
$begingroup$
For example, on $mathbbR$ there exists trivial topology which contains only $mathbbR$ and $emptyset$ and in that topology all open sets are closed and all closed sets are open.
Question. Does there exist non-trivial topology on $mathbbR$ for which all open sets are closed and all closed sets are open? Further, given some general set $X$ whose number of elements is finite, could we always construct non-trivial topology where all open sets are closed and all closed sets are open? What if $X$ has a non-finite number of elements?
I hope my question is not meaningless.
Thank you for any help.
general-topology
$endgroup$
For example, on $mathbbR$ there exists trivial topology which contains only $mathbbR$ and $emptyset$ and in that topology all open sets are closed and all closed sets are open.
Question. Does there exist non-trivial topology on $mathbbR$ for which all open sets are closed and all closed sets are open? Further, given some general set $X$ whose number of elements is finite, could we always construct non-trivial topology where all open sets are closed and all closed sets are open? What if $X$ has a non-finite number of elements?
I hope my question is not meaningless.
Thank you for any help.
general-topology
general-topology
edited yesterday
YuiTo Cheng
2,0592637
2,0592637
asked yesterday
ThomThom
361111
361111
2
$begingroup$
The trivial topology on a set $X$ is $emptyset, X$. The discrete topology on a set $X$ is $2^X$. Both have the property that you are looking for, though I am not sure if you are using the term "trivial" here in reference to the trivial topology or just to mean "simple".
$endgroup$
– parsiad
yesterday
2
$begingroup$
(1) The discrete topology, where all subsets are open and closed. (2) Given any partition $X_i_iin Iof $X$, take as a topology the colleciton of all sets that are unions of elements of the partition; the complements are also unions of elements of the partition. This works for any set, regardless of cardinality, and any partition, regarless of size of the partition or of its constituent sets.
$endgroup$
– Arturo Magidin
yesterday
2
$begingroup$
Related to your question are door spaces and extremally disconnected spaces.
$endgroup$
– William Elliot
yesterday
$begingroup$
As noted in the answers, the spaces you are asking about are effectively discrete. The extremally disconnected spaces (spaces such that the closure of any open set is open) suggested by @WilliamElliot can be much more interesting.
$endgroup$
– tomasz
yesterday
add a comment |
2
$begingroup$
The trivial topology on a set $X$ is $emptyset, X$. The discrete topology on a set $X$ is $2^X$. Both have the property that you are looking for, though I am not sure if you are using the term "trivial" here in reference to the trivial topology or just to mean "simple".
$endgroup$
– parsiad
yesterday
2
$begingroup$
(1) The discrete topology, where all subsets are open and closed. (2) Given any partition $X_i_iin Iof $X$, take as a topology the colleciton of all sets that are unions of elements of the partition; the complements are also unions of elements of the partition. This works for any set, regardless of cardinality, and any partition, regarless of size of the partition or of its constituent sets.
$endgroup$
– Arturo Magidin
yesterday
2
$begingroup$
Related to your question are door spaces and extremally disconnected spaces.
$endgroup$
– William Elliot
yesterday
$begingroup$
As noted in the answers, the spaces you are asking about are effectively discrete. The extremally disconnected spaces (spaces such that the closure of any open set is open) suggested by @WilliamElliot can be much more interesting.
$endgroup$
– tomasz
yesterday
2
2
$begingroup$
The trivial topology on a set $X$ is $emptyset, X$. The discrete topology on a set $X$ is $2^X$. Both have the property that you are looking for, though I am not sure if you are using the term "trivial" here in reference to the trivial topology or just to mean "simple".
$endgroup$
– parsiad
yesterday
$begingroup$
The trivial topology on a set $X$ is $emptyset, X$. The discrete topology on a set $X$ is $2^X$. Both have the property that you are looking for, though I am not sure if you are using the term "trivial" here in reference to the trivial topology or just to mean "simple".
$endgroup$
– parsiad
yesterday
2
2
$begingroup$
(1) The discrete topology, where all subsets are open and closed. (2) Given any partition $X_i_iin Iof $X$, take as a topology the colleciton of all sets that are unions of elements of the partition; the complements are also unions of elements of the partition. This works for any set, regardless of cardinality, and any partition, regarless of size of the partition or of its constituent sets.
$endgroup$
– Arturo Magidin
yesterday
$begingroup$
(1) The discrete topology, where all subsets are open and closed. (2) Given any partition $X_i_iin Iof $X$, take as a topology the colleciton of all sets that are unions of elements of the partition; the complements are also unions of elements of the partition. This works for any set, regardless of cardinality, and any partition, regarless of size of the partition or of its constituent sets.
$endgroup$
– Arturo Magidin
yesterday
2
2
$begingroup$
Related to your question are door spaces and extremally disconnected spaces.
$endgroup$
– William Elliot
yesterday
$begingroup$
Related to your question are door spaces and extremally disconnected spaces.
$endgroup$
– William Elliot
yesterday
$begingroup$
As noted in the answers, the spaces you are asking about are effectively discrete. The extremally disconnected spaces (spaces such that the closure of any open set is open) suggested by @WilliamElliot can be much more interesting.
$endgroup$
– tomasz
yesterday
$begingroup$
As noted in the answers, the spaces you are asking about are effectively discrete. The extremally disconnected spaces (spaces such that the closure of any open set is open) suggested by @WilliamElliot can be much more interesting.
$endgroup$
– tomasz
yesterday
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
The topologies with this property are precisely the ones that are derived from partitions of the underlying set $X$.
Specifically, let $mathcalP=X_i_iin I$ be a partition of $X$, and let $tau$ be the collection of sets of the form $cup_iin I_0X_i$ for $I_0subseteq I$. Then $tau$ is a topology: the empty set corresponds to $I_0=varnothing$, the set $X$ to $I_0=I$; the union of such sets corresponds to the family indexed by the union of indices, and the intersection to the intersection of the indices. Moreover, the complement of the set corresponding to $I_0$ is the set corresponding to $I-I_0$. Thus, $tau$ has the desired property.
Now let $tau$ be any topology on $X$ with the desired property. Define an equivalence relation on $X$ by letting $xsim y$ if and only if for every $Ain tau$, $xin A$ if and only if $yin A$. Trivially, this is an equivalence relation, and so induces a partition on $X$. I claim that $tau$ is in fact, the topology induced by this partition as above.
Indeed, if $Ain tau$, then $A=cup_xin A[x]$, where $[x]$ is the equivalence class of $x$. Trivially $A$ is contained in the right hand side, and if $yin[x]$, then since $xin A$ then $yin A$, so we have equality.
Now, conversely, let $xin X$ and look at $[x]$. I claim that $X-[x]$ lies in $tau$. So see this, let $zin X-[x]$. Then since $znotin [x]$, there exists an open set $A_zin tau$ such that $zin A_z$ but $xnotin A_z$ (and hence, $[x]cap A_z=varnothing$). Now, $cup_znotin[x]A_z$ is an open set, contains every element of $X-[x]$, and intersects $[x]$ trivially because each element in the union does. That is, this open set is $A-[x]$; but since the complement of every open set is open, and $A-[x]$ is open, then $[x]$ is open. Thus, $[x]intau$.
We have then proven that every element of the partition induced by $sim$ is open, and that every open set is a union of such elements of the partition. That is, the open sets are precisely the unions of elements of the partition $X/sim$.
Added. The equivalence relation given in the second part can be defined in any topology, of course; and the proof that every open set is a union of equivalence classes and that the complement of an equivalence class is open, always hold. The only place where we used the hypothesis that all open sets are closed was to conclude the equivalence class itself was open. For example, in the standard topology for $mathbbR$, the equivalence relation is the trivial one.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
You can manufacture examples like this pretty easily. Let $A$ be any subset of $mathbbR$. Put a topology on $mathbbR$ with the following open sets:
$$
varnothing, A, mathbbR-A, mathbbR.
$$
You can easily check that this always gives a topology, and a subset of $mathbbR$ is open if and only if it is closed. This construction generalizes to any set $X$: there's nothing special about $mathbbR$ here.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
More generally, take any partition and take unions of elements of the partition. This example is what you get from the partition $A,mathbbR-A$.
$endgroup$
– Arturo Magidin
yesterday
$begingroup$
@ArturoMagidin Let us denote with X set of all topologies which satisfy property in the question on $mathbbR$. Can every topology in $X$ be made with some partitions?
$endgroup$
– Thom
yesterday
$begingroup$
@Thom: Yes. I’ll write it up.
$endgroup$
– Arturo Magidin
yesterday
$begingroup$
@ArturoMagidin Fascinating. Thank you.
$endgroup$
– Thom
yesterday
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
);
);
, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3151030%2fnon-trivial-topology-where-only-open-sets-are-closed%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
The topologies with this property are precisely the ones that are derived from partitions of the underlying set $X$.
Specifically, let $mathcalP=X_i_iin I$ be a partition of $X$, and let $tau$ be the collection of sets of the form $cup_iin I_0X_i$ for $I_0subseteq I$. Then $tau$ is a topology: the empty set corresponds to $I_0=varnothing$, the set $X$ to $I_0=I$; the union of such sets corresponds to the family indexed by the union of indices, and the intersection to the intersection of the indices. Moreover, the complement of the set corresponding to $I_0$ is the set corresponding to $I-I_0$. Thus, $tau$ has the desired property.
Now let $tau$ be any topology on $X$ with the desired property. Define an equivalence relation on $X$ by letting $xsim y$ if and only if for every $Ain tau$, $xin A$ if and only if $yin A$. Trivially, this is an equivalence relation, and so induces a partition on $X$. I claim that $tau$ is in fact, the topology induced by this partition as above.
Indeed, if $Ain tau$, then $A=cup_xin A[x]$, where $[x]$ is the equivalence class of $x$. Trivially $A$ is contained in the right hand side, and if $yin[x]$, then since $xin A$ then $yin A$, so we have equality.
Now, conversely, let $xin X$ and look at $[x]$. I claim that $X-[x]$ lies in $tau$. So see this, let $zin X-[x]$. Then since $znotin [x]$, there exists an open set $A_zin tau$ such that $zin A_z$ but $xnotin A_z$ (and hence, $[x]cap A_z=varnothing$). Now, $cup_znotin[x]A_z$ is an open set, contains every element of $X-[x]$, and intersects $[x]$ trivially because each element in the union does. That is, this open set is $A-[x]$; but since the complement of every open set is open, and $A-[x]$ is open, then $[x]$ is open. Thus, $[x]intau$.
We have then proven that every element of the partition induced by $sim$ is open, and that every open set is a union of such elements of the partition. That is, the open sets are precisely the unions of elements of the partition $X/sim$.
Added. The equivalence relation given in the second part can be defined in any topology, of course; and the proof that every open set is a union of equivalence classes and that the complement of an equivalence class is open, always hold. The only place where we used the hypothesis that all open sets are closed was to conclude the equivalence class itself was open. For example, in the standard topology for $mathbbR$, the equivalence relation is the trivial one.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The topologies with this property are precisely the ones that are derived from partitions of the underlying set $X$.
Specifically, let $mathcalP=X_i_iin I$ be a partition of $X$, and let $tau$ be the collection of sets of the form $cup_iin I_0X_i$ for $I_0subseteq I$. Then $tau$ is a topology: the empty set corresponds to $I_0=varnothing$, the set $X$ to $I_0=I$; the union of such sets corresponds to the family indexed by the union of indices, and the intersection to the intersection of the indices. Moreover, the complement of the set corresponding to $I_0$ is the set corresponding to $I-I_0$. Thus, $tau$ has the desired property.
Now let $tau$ be any topology on $X$ with the desired property. Define an equivalence relation on $X$ by letting $xsim y$ if and only if for every $Ain tau$, $xin A$ if and only if $yin A$. Trivially, this is an equivalence relation, and so induces a partition on $X$. I claim that $tau$ is in fact, the topology induced by this partition as above.
Indeed, if $Ain tau$, then $A=cup_xin A[x]$, where $[x]$ is the equivalence class of $x$. Trivially $A$ is contained in the right hand side, and if $yin[x]$, then since $xin A$ then $yin A$, so we have equality.
Now, conversely, let $xin X$ and look at $[x]$. I claim that $X-[x]$ lies in $tau$. So see this, let $zin X-[x]$. Then since $znotin [x]$, there exists an open set $A_zin tau$ such that $zin A_z$ but $xnotin A_z$ (and hence, $[x]cap A_z=varnothing$). Now, $cup_znotin[x]A_z$ is an open set, contains every element of $X-[x]$, and intersects $[x]$ trivially because each element in the union does. That is, this open set is $A-[x]$; but since the complement of every open set is open, and $A-[x]$ is open, then $[x]$ is open. Thus, $[x]intau$.
We have then proven that every element of the partition induced by $sim$ is open, and that every open set is a union of such elements of the partition. That is, the open sets are precisely the unions of elements of the partition $X/sim$.
Added. The equivalence relation given in the second part can be defined in any topology, of course; and the proof that every open set is a union of equivalence classes and that the complement of an equivalence class is open, always hold. The only place where we used the hypothesis that all open sets are closed was to conclude the equivalence class itself was open. For example, in the standard topology for $mathbbR$, the equivalence relation is the trivial one.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The topologies with this property are precisely the ones that are derived from partitions of the underlying set $X$.
Specifically, let $mathcalP=X_i_iin I$ be a partition of $X$, and let $tau$ be the collection of sets of the form $cup_iin I_0X_i$ for $I_0subseteq I$. Then $tau$ is a topology: the empty set corresponds to $I_0=varnothing$, the set $X$ to $I_0=I$; the union of such sets corresponds to the family indexed by the union of indices, and the intersection to the intersection of the indices. Moreover, the complement of the set corresponding to $I_0$ is the set corresponding to $I-I_0$. Thus, $tau$ has the desired property.
Now let $tau$ be any topology on $X$ with the desired property. Define an equivalence relation on $X$ by letting $xsim y$ if and only if for every $Ain tau$, $xin A$ if and only if $yin A$. Trivially, this is an equivalence relation, and so induces a partition on $X$. I claim that $tau$ is in fact, the topology induced by this partition as above.
Indeed, if $Ain tau$, then $A=cup_xin A[x]$, where $[x]$ is the equivalence class of $x$. Trivially $A$ is contained in the right hand side, and if $yin[x]$, then since $xin A$ then $yin A$, so we have equality.
Now, conversely, let $xin X$ and look at $[x]$. I claim that $X-[x]$ lies in $tau$. So see this, let $zin X-[x]$. Then since $znotin [x]$, there exists an open set $A_zin tau$ such that $zin A_z$ but $xnotin A_z$ (and hence, $[x]cap A_z=varnothing$). Now, $cup_znotin[x]A_z$ is an open set, contains every element of $X-[x]$, and intersects $[x]$ trivially because each element in the union does. That is, this open set is $A-[x]$; but since the complement of every open set is open, and $A-[x]$ is open, then $[x]$ is open. Thus, $[x]intau$.
We have then proven that every element of the partition induced by $sim$ is open, and that every open set is a union of such elements of the partition. That is, the open sets are precisely the unions of elements of the partition $X/sim$.
Added. The equivalence relation given in the second part can be defined in any topology, of course; and the proof that every open set is a union of equivalence classes and that the complement of an equivalence class is open, always hold. The only place where we used the hypothesis that all open sets are closed was to conclude the equivalence class itself was open. For example, in the standard topology for $mathbbR$, the equivalence relation is the trivial one.
$endgroup$
The topologies with this property are precisely the ones that are derived from partitions of the underlying set $X$.
Specifically, let $mathcalP=X_i_iin I$ be a partition of $X$, and let $tau$ be the collection of sets of the form $cup_iin I_0X_i$ for $I_0subseteq I$. Then $tau$ is a topology: the empty set corresponds to $I_0=varnothing$, the set $X$ to $I_0=I$; the union of such sets corresponds to the family indexed by the union of indices, and the intersection to the intersection of the indices. Moreover, the complement of the set corresponding to $I_0$ is the set corresponding to $I-I_0$. Thus, $tau$ has the desired property.
Now let $tau$ be any topology on $X$ with the desired property. Define an equivalence relation on $X$ by letting $xsim y$ if and only if for every $Ain tau$, $xin A$ if and only if $yin A$. Trivially, this is an equivalence relation, and so induces a partition on $X$. I claim that $tau$ is in fact, the topology induced by this partition as above.
Indeed, if $Ain tau$, then $A=cup_xin A[x]$, where $[x]$ is the equivalence class of $x$. Trivially $A$ is contained in the right hand side, and if $yin[x]$, then since $xin A$ then $yin A$, so we have equality.
Now, conversely, let $xin X$ and look at $[x]$. I claim that $X-[x]$ lies in $tau$. So see this, let $zin X-[x]$. Then since $znotin [x]$, there exists an open set $A_zin tau$ such that $zin A_z$ but $xnotin A_z$ (and hence, $[x]cap A_z=varnothing$). Now, $cup_znotin[x]A_z$ is an open set, contains every element of $X-[x]$, and intersects $[x]$ trivially because each element in the union does. That is, this open set is $A-[x]$; but since the complement of every open set is open, and $A-[x]$ is open, then $[x]$ is open. Thus, $[x]intau$.
We have then proven that every element of the partition induced by $sim$ is open, and that every open set is a union of such elements of the partition. That is, the open sets are precisely the unions of elements of the partition $X/sim$.
Added. The equivalence relation given in the second part can be defined in any topology, of course; and the proof that every open set is a union of equivalence classes and that the complement of an equivalence class is open, always hold. The only place where we used the hypothesis that all open sets are closed was to conclude the equivalence class itself was open. For example, in the standard topology for $mathbbR$, the equivalence relation is the trivial one.
edited 21 hours ago
answered yesterday
Arturo MagidinArturo Magidin
265k34590919
265k34590919
add a comment |
add a comment |
$begingroup$
You can manufacture examples like this pretty easily. Let $A$ be any subset of $mathbbR$. Put a topology on $mathbbR$ with the following open sets:
$$
varnothing, A, mathbbR-A, mathbbR.
$$
You can easily check that this always gives a topology, and a subset of $mathbbR$ is open if and only if it is closed. This construction generalizes to any set $X$: there's nothing special about $mathbbR$ here.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
More generally, take any partition and take unions of elements of the partition. This example is what you get from the partition $A,mathbbR-A$.
$endgroup$
– Arturo Magidin
yesterday
$begingroup$
@ArturoMagidin Let us denote with X set of all topologies which satisfy property in the question on $mathbbR$. Can every topology in $X$ be made with some partitions?
$endgroup$
– Thom
yesterday
$begingroup$
@Thom: Yes. I’ll write it up.
$endgroup$
– Arturo Magidin
yesterday
$begingroup$
@ArturoMagidin Fascinating. Thank you.
$endgroup$
– Thom
yesterday
add a comment |
$begingroup$
You can manufacture examples like this pretty easily. Let $A$ be any subset of $mathbbR$. Put a topology on $mathbbR$ with the following open sets:
$$
varnothing, A, mathbbR-A, mathbbR.
$$
You can easily check that this always gives a topology, and a subset of $mathbbR$ is open if and only if it is closed. This construction generalizes to any set $X$: there's nothing special about $mathbbR$ here.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
More generally, take any partition and take unions of elements of the partition. This example is what you get from the partition $A,mathbbR-A$.
$endgroup$
– Arturo Magidin
yesterday
$begingroup$
@ArturoMagidin Let us denote with X set of all topologies which satisfy property in the question on $mathbbR$. Can every topology in $X$ be made with some partitions?
$endgroup$
– Thom
yesterday
$begingroup$
@Thom: Yes. I’ll write it up.
$endgroup$
– Arturo Magidin
yesterday
$begingroup$
@ArturoMagidin Fascinating. Thank you.
$endgroup$
– Thom
yesterday
add a comment |
$begingroup$
You can manufacture examples like this pretty easily. Let $A$ be any subset of $mathbbR$. Put a topology on $mathbbR$ with the following open sets:
$$
varnothing, A, mathbbR-A, mathbbR.
$$
You can easily check that this always gives a topology, and a subset of $mathbbR$ is open if and only if it is closed. This construction generalizes to any set $X$: there's nothing special about $mathbbR$ here.
$endgroup$
You can manufacture examples like this pretty easily. Let $A$ be any subset of $mathbbR$. Put a topology on $mathbbR$ with the following open sets:
$$
varnothing, A, mathbbR-A, mathbbR.
$$
You can easily check that this always gives a topology, and a subset of $mathbbR$ is open if and only if it is closed. This construction generalizes to any set $X$: there's nothing special about $mathbbR$ here.
answered yesterday
RandallRandall
10.6k11431
10.6k11431
$begingroup$
More generally, take any partition and take unions of elements of the partition. This example is what you get from the partition $A,mathbbR-A$.
$endgroup$
– Arturo Magidin
yesterday
$begingroup$
@ArturoMagidin Let us denote with X set of all topologies which satisfy property in the question on $mathbbR$. Can every topology in $X$ be made with some partitions?
$endgroup$
– Thom
yesterday
$begingroup$
@Thom: Yes. I’ll write it up.
$endgroup$
– Arturo Magidin
yesterday
$begingroup$
@ArturoMagidin Fascinating. Thank you.
$endgroup$
– Thom
yesterday
add a comment |
$begingroup$
More generally, take any partition and take unions of elements of the partition. This example is what you get from the partition $A,mathbbR-A$.
$endgroup$
– Arturo Magidin
yesterday
$begingroup$
@ArturoMagidin Let us denote with X set of all topologies which satisfy property in the question on $mathbbR$. Can every topology in $X$ be made with some partitions?
$endgroup$
– Thom
yesterday
$begingroup$
@Thom: Yes. I’ll write it up.
$endgroup$
– Arturo Magidin
yesterday
$begingroup$
@ArturoMagidin Fascinating. Thank you.
$endgroup$
– Thom
yesterday
$begingroup$
More generally, take any partition and take unions of elements of the partition. This example is what you get from the partition $A,mathbbR-A$.
$endgroup$
– Arturo Magidin
yesterday
$begingroup$
More generally, take any partition and take unions of elements of the partition. This example is what you get from the partition $A,mathbbR-A$.
$endgroup$
– Arturo Magidin
yesterday
$begingroup$
@ArturoMagidin Let us denote with X set of all topologies which satisfy property in the question on $mathbbR$. Can every topology in $X$ be made with some partitions?
$endgroup$
– Thom
yesterday
$begingroup$
@ArturoMagidin Let us denote with X set of all topologies which satisfy property in the question on $mathbbR$. Can every topology in $X$ be made with some partitions?
$endgroup$
– Thom
yesterday
$begingroup$
@Thom: Yes. I’ll write it up.
$endgroup$
– Arturo Magidin
yesterday
$begingroup$
@Thom: Yes. I’ll write it up.
$endgroup$
– Arturo Magidin
yesterday
$begingroup$
@ArturoMagidin Fascinating. Thank you.
$endgroup$
– Thom
yesterday
$begingroup$
@ArturoMagidin Fascinating. Thank you.
$endgroup$
– Thom
yesterday
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3151030%2fnon-trivial-topology-where-only-open-sets-are-closed%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
2
$begingroup$
The trivial topology on a set $X$ is $emptyset, X$. The discrete topology on a set $X$ is $2^X$. Both have the property that you are looking for, though I am not sure if you are using the term "trivial" here in reference to the trivial topology or just to mean "simple".
$endgroup$
– parsiad
yesterday
2
$begingroup$
(1) The discrete topology, where all subsets are open and closed. (2) Given any partition $X_i_iin Iof $X$, take as a topology the colleciton of all sets that are unions of elements of the partition; the complements are also unions of elements of the partition. This works for any set, regardless of cardinality, and any partition, regarless of size of the partition or of its constituent sets.
$endgroup$
– Arturo Magidin
yesterday
2
$begingroup$
Related to your question are door spaces and extremally disconnected spaces.
$endgroup$
– William Elliot
yesterday
$begingroup$
As noted in the answers, the spaces you are asking about are effectively discrete. The extremally disconnected spaces (spaces such that the closure of any open set is open) suggested by @WilliamElliot can be much more interesting.
$endgroup$
– tomasz
yesterday