Relationship between sampajanna definitions in SN 47.2 and SN 47.35Sūkarakhata sutta and the “arahants seeking benefits they already have”What is the difference between Karma and SanskaraDifference between Pacceka Buddha and Arahant?What are the differences between meritorious acts and wholesome acts?What does the word 'nimitta' ('sign') refer to in SN 47.8?Delayed speech as right speechCan someone explain the difference classification and referencing between english tipitaka and thai tipitaka?Lord Buddha and ChakravartinDifference between aggregates and clinging-aggregates?Difference between sati and sampajanna

Exit shell with shortcut (not typing exit) that closes session properly

What will the french man say?

Would it be believable to defy demographics in a story?

Would this string work as string?

Is xar preinstalled on macOS?

When should a starting writer get his own webpage?

Should I be concerned about student access to a test bank?

10 year ban after applying for a UK student visa

Would mining huge amounts of resources on the Moon change its orbit?

Probabilities in non-stationary states

Do native speakers use "ultima" and "proxima" frequently in spoken English?

Splitting fasta file into smaller files based on header pattern

Pre-Employment Background Check With Consent For Future Checks

The English Debate

Why doesn't the chatan sign the ketubah?

Inhabiting Mars versus going straight for a Dyson swarm

When did hardware antialiasing start being available?

How do hiring committees for research positions view getting "scooped"?

Unfrosted light bulb

How are passwords stolen from companies if they only store hashes?

Single word to change groups

In the backstop position will the UK be able to negotiate FTAs?

Do I need an EFI partition for each 18.04 ubuntu I have on my HD?

Can other pieces capture a threatening piece and prevent a checkmate?



Relationship between sampajanna definitions in SN 47.2 and SN 47.35


Sūkarakhata sutta and the “arahants seeking benefits they already have”What is the difference between Karma and SanskaraDifference between Pacceka Buddha and Arahant?What are the differences between meritorious acts and wholesome acts?What does the word 'nimitta' ('sign') refer to in SN 47.8?Delayed speech as right speechCan someone explain the difference classification and referencing between english tipitaka and thai tipitaka?Lord Buddha and ChakravartinDifference between aggregates and clinging-aggregates?Difference between sati and sampajanna













1















What is the relationship between the definitions of sampajañña (clear comprehension) in SN 47.2 and SN 47.35?



From SN 47.35 (translated by Bodhi):




“And how, bhikkhus, does a bhikkhu exercise clear comprehension? Here,
bhikkhus, for a bhikkhu feelings are understood as they arise,
understood as they remain present, understood as they pass away.
Thoughts are understood as they arise, understood as they remain
present, understood as they pass away. Perceptions are understood as
they arise, understood as they remain present, understood as they pass
away. It is in this way, bhikkhus, that a bhikkhu exercises clear
comprehension.




From SN 47.2 (translated by Bodhi):




“And how, bhikkhus, does a bhikkhu exercise clear comprehension? Here,
bhikkhus, a bhikkhu is one who acts with clear comprehension when
going forward and returning; when looking ahead and looking aside;
when drawing in and extending the limbs; when wearing his robes and
carrying his outer robe and bowl; when eating, drinking, chewing his
food, and tasting; when defecating and urinating; when walking,
standing, sitting, falling asleep, waking up, speaking, and keeping
silent. It is in such a way that a bhikkhu exercises clear
comprehension.











share|improve this question


























    1















    What is the relationship between the definitions of sampajañña (clear comprehension) in SN 47.2 and SN 47.35?



    From SN 47.35 (translated by Bodhi):




    “And how, bhikkhus, does a bhikkhu exercise clear comprehension? Here,
    bhikkhus, for a bhikkhu feelings are understood as they arise,
    understood as they remain present, understood as they pass away.
    Thoughts are understood as they arise, understood as they remain
    present, understood as they pass away. Perceptions are understood as
    they arise, understood as they remain present, understood as they pass
    away. It is in this way, bhikkhus, that a bhikkhu exercises clear
    comprehension.




    From SN 47.2 (translated by Bodhi):




    “And how, bhikkhus, does a bhikkhu exercise clear comprehension? Here,
    bhikkhus, a bhikkhu is one who acts with clear comprehension when
    going forward and returning; when looking ahead and looking aside;
    when drawing in and extending the limbs; when wearing his robes and
    carrying his outer robe and bowl; when eating, drinking, chewing his
    food, and tasting; when defecating and urinating; when walking,
    standing, sitting, falling asleep, waking up, speaking, and keeping
    silent. It is in such a way that a bhikkhu exercises clear
    comprehension.











    share|improve this question
























      1












      1








      1








      What is the relationship between the definitions of sampajañña (clear comprehension) in SN 47.2 and SN 47.35?



      From SN 47.35 (translated by Bodhi):




      “And how, bhikkhus, does a bhikkhu exercise clear comprehension? Here,
      bhikkhus, for a bhikkhu feelings are understood as they arise,
      understood as they remain present, understood as they pass away.
      Thoughts are understood as they arise, understood as they remain
      present, understood as they pass away. Perceptions are understood as
      they arise, understood as they remain present, understood as they pass
      away. It is in this way, bhikkhus, that a bhikkhu exercises clear
      comprehension.




      From SN 47.2 (translated by Bodhi):




      “And how, bhikkhus, does a bhikkhu exercise clear comprehension? Here,
      bhikkhus, a bhikkhu is one who acts with clear comprehension when
      going forward and returning; when looking ahead and looking aside;
      when drawing in and extending the limbs; when wearing his robes and
      carrying his outer robe and bowl; when eating, drinking, chewing his
      food, and tasting; when defecating and urinating; when walking,
      standing, sitting, falling asleep, waking up, speaking, and keeping
      silent. It is in such a way that a bhikkhu exercises clear
      comprehension.











      share|improve this question














      What is the relationship between the definitions of sampajañña (clear comprehension) in SN 47.2 and SN 47.35?



      From SN 47.35 (translated by Bodhi):




      “And how, bhikkhus, does a bhikkhu exercise clear comprehension? Here,
      bhikkhus, for a bhikkhu feelings are understood as they arise,
      understood as they remain present, understood as they pass away.
      Thoughts are understood as they arise, understood as they remain
      present, understood as they pass away. Perceptions are understood as
      they arise, understood as they remain present, understood as they pass
      away. It is in this way, bhikkhus, that a bhikkhu exercises clear
      comprehension.




      From SN 47.2 (translated by Bodhi):




      “And how, bhikkhus, does a bhikkhu exercise clear comprehension? Here,
      bhikkhus, a bhikkhu is one who acts with clear comprehension when
      going forward and returning; when looking ahead and looking aside;
      when drawing in and extending the limbs; when wearing his robes and
      carrying his outer robe and bowl; when eating, drinking, chewing his
      food, and tasting; when defecating and urinating; when walking,
      standing, sitting, falling asleep, waking up, speaking, and keeping
      silent. It is in such a way that a bhikkhu exercises clear
      comprehension.








      pali-canon sampajana






      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question











      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question










      asked yesterday









      ruben2020ruben2020

      15.8k31243




      15.8k31243




















          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          2














          In line with what I said in my other answer, both are descriptions of self-awareness, of not getting carried away by the circumstances.



          This does not refer to "zombie bare awareness" executed mechanically, but to normal, pragmatic, careful self-awareness of an intelligent person.






          share|improve this answer























          • Yes, unfortunately, a lot of modern mindfulness teachers seem to be teaching it wrongly. They teach "Be aware in the present moment and simply observe X without judging" when it should be "Don't forget to keep observing X and thoroughly understanding the arising, changing and ceasing of X without judging", where X refers to body, feelings, thoughts and phenomena, and "without judging" means actively removing greed and aversion.

            – ruben2020
            yesterday







          • 1





            Yup. Not just arising/ceasing and removing greed/aversion, but also seeing any biases, attachments, egoistic motives, defensiveness, self-promotion etc.

            – Andrei Volkov
            yesterday












          • I'll group "biases, attachments, egoistic motives, defensiveness, self-promotion" under views. So, removing greed, aversion and views.

            – ruben2020
            yesterday


















          1















          And how, bhikkhus, does a bhikkhu exercise clear comprehension? Here, bhikkhus, for a bhikkhu feelings are understood as they arise,
          understood as they remain present, understood as they pass away.
          Thoughts are understood as they arise, understood as they remain
          present, understood as they pass away. Perceptions are understood as
          they arise, understood as they remain present, understood as they pass
          away. It is in this way, bhikkhus, that a bhikkhu exercises clear
          comprehension.



          SN 47.35




          The above means feelings, perceptions & thoughts are clearly understood in terms of the Dhamma, namely, they are impermanent, not-self, not to be clung to.



          Note: This is not vipassana, namely, observing arising & passing of feelings, perceptions & thoughts. It is understanding feelings, perceptions & thoughts, including when they are purposefully used. Thus, when speaking to another, for example, the mind understands: "These thoughts are conventions, subjective, not to be clung to, etc".




          And how, bhikkhus, does a bhikkhu exercise clear comprehension? Here, bhikkhus, a bhikkhu is one who acts with clear comprehension when
          going forward and returning; when looking ahead and looking aside;
          when drawing in and extending the limbs; when wearing his robes and
          carrying his outer robe and bowl; when eating, drinking, chewing his
          food, and tasting; when defecating and urinating; when walking,
          standing, sitting, falling asleep, waking up, speaking, and keeping
          silent. It is in such a way that a bhikkhu exercises clear
          comprehension.



          SN 47.2




          The above is exactly the same. When walking, the monk has clear-comprehension, such as: "I am monk; I must walk so I make a good public impression" or "I am a monk; I must eat non-hurriedly; so I make a good public impression"; or the monk reflects: "This walking is not self" (such as when Rahula was walking behind the Buddha in MN 62 and the Buddha rebuked Rahula for regarding the Buddha as a "self" or with "beauty").






          share|improve this answer
























            Your Answer








            StackExchange.ready(function()
            var channelOptions =
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "565"
            ;
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
            createEditor();
            );

            else
            createEditor();

            );

            function createEditor()
            StackExchange.prepareEditor(
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
            convertImagesToLinks: false,
            noModals: true,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: null,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            imageUploader:
            brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
            contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
            allowUrls: true
            ,
            noCode: true, onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            );



            );













            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fbuddhism.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f31566%2frelationship-between-sampajanna-definitions-in-sn-47-2-and-sn-47-35%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown

























            2 Answers
            2






            active

            oldest

            votes








            2 Answers
            2






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes









            2














            In line with what I said in my other answer, both are descriptions of self-awareness, of not getting carried away by the circumstances.



            This does not refer to "zombie bare awareness" executed mechanically, but to normal, pragmatic, careful self-awareness of an intelligent person.






            share|improve this answer























            • Yes, unfortunately, a lot of modern mindfulness teachers seem to be teaching it wrongly. They teach "Be aware in the present moment and simply observe X without judging" when it should be "Don't forget to keep observing X and thoroughly understanding the arising, changing and ceasing of X without judging", where X refers to body, feelings, thoughts and phenomena, and "without judging" means actively removing greed and aversion.

              – ruben2020
              yesterday







            • 1





              Yup. Not just arising/ceasing and removing greed/aversion, but also seeing any biases, attachments, egoistic motives, defensiveness, self-promotion etc.

              – Andrei Volkov
              yesterday












            • I'll group "biases, attachments, egoistic motives, defensiveness, self-promotion" under views. So, removing greed, aversion and views.

              – ruben2020
              yesterday















            2














            In line with what I said in my other answer, both are descriptions of self-awareness, of not getting carried away by the circumstances.



            This does not refer to "zombie bare awareness" executed mechanically, but to normal, pragmatic, careful self-awareness of an intelligent person.






            share|improve this answer























            • Yes, unfortunately, a lot of modern mindfulness teachers seem to be teaching it wrongly. They teach "Be aware in the present moment and simply observe X without judging" when it should be "Don't forget to keep observing X and thoroughly understanding the arising, changing and ceasing of X without judging", where X refers to body, feelings, thoughts and phenomena, and "without judging" means actively removing greed and aversion.

              – ruben2020
              yesterday







            • 1





              Yup. Not just arising/ceasing and removing greed/aversion, but also seeing any biases, attachments, egoistic motives, defensiveness, self-promotion etc.

              – Andrei Volkov
              yesterday












            • I'll group "biases, attachments, egoistic motives, defensiveness, self-promotion" under views. So, removing greed, aversion and views.

              – ruben2020
              yesterday













            2












            2








            2







            In line with what I said in my other answer, both are descriptions of self-awareness, of not getting carried away by the circumstances.



            This does not refer to "zombie bare awareness" executed mechanically, but to normal, pragmatic, careful self-awareness of an intelligent person.






            share|improve this answer













            In line with what I said in my other answer, both are descriptions of self-awareness, of not getting carried away by the circumstances.



            This does not refer to "zombie bare awareness" executed mechanically, but to normal, pragmatic, careful self-awareness of an intelligent person.







            share|improve this answer












            share|improve this answer



            share|improve this answer










            answered yesterday









            Andrei VolkovAndrei Volkov

            38.9k331110




            38.9k331110












            • Yes, unfortunately, a lot of modern mindfulness teachers seem to be teaching it wrongly. They teach "Be aware in the present moment and simply observe X without judging" when it should be "Don't forget to keep observing X and thoroughly understanding the arising, changing and ceasing of X without judging", where X refers to body, feelings, thoughts and phenomena, and "without judging" means actively removing greed and aversion.

              – ruben2020
              yesterday







            • 1





              Yup. Not just arising/ceasing and removing greed/aversion, but also seeing any biases, attachments, egoistic motives, defensiveness, self-promotion etc.

              – Andrei Volkov
              yesterday












            • I'll group "biases, attachments, egoistic motives, defensiveness, self-promotion" under views. So, removing greed, aversion and views.

              – ruben2020
              yesterday

















            • Yes, unfortunately, a lot of modern mindfulness teachers seem to be teaching it wrongly. They teach "Be aware in the present moment and simply observe X without judging" when it should be "Don't forget to keep observing X and thoroughly understanding the arising, changing and ceasing of X without judging", where X refers to body, feelings, thoughts and phenomena, and "without judging" means actively removing greed and aversion.

              – ruben2020
              yesterday







            • 1





              Yup. Not just arising/ceasing and removing greed/aversion, but also seeing any biases, attachments, egoistic motives, defensiveness, self-promotion etc.

              – Andrei Volkov
              yesterday












            • I'll group "biases, attachments, egoistic motives, defensiveness, self-promotion" under views. So, removing greed, aversion and views.

              – ruben2020
              yesterday
















            Yes, unfortunately, a lot of modern mindfulness teachers seem to be teaching it wrongly. They teach "Be aware in the present moment and simply observe X without judging" when it should be "Don't forget to keep observing X and thoroughly understanding the arising, changing and ceasing of X without judging", where X refers to body, feelings, thoughts and phenomena, and "without judging" means actively removing greed and aversion.

            – ruben2020
            yesterday






            Yes, unfortunately, a lot of modern mindfulness teachers seem to be teaching it wrongly. They teach "Be aware in the present moment and simply observe X without judging" when it should be "Don't forget to keep observing X and thoroughly understanding the arising, changing and ceasing of X without judging", where X refers to body, feelings, thoughts and phenomena, and "without judging" means actively removing greed and aversion.

            – ruben2020
            yesterday





            1




            1





            Yup. Not just arising/ceasing and removing greed/aversion, but also seeing any biases, attachments, egoistic motives, defensiveness, self-promotion etc.

            – Andrei Volkov
            yesterday






            Yup. Not just arising/ceasing and removing greed/aversion, but also seeing any biases, attachments, egoistic motives, defensiveness, self-promotion etc.

            – Andrei Volkov
            yesterday














            I'll group "biases, attachments, egoistic motives, defensiveness, self-promotion" under views. So, removing greed, aversion and views.

            – ruben2020
            yesterday





            I'll group "biases, attachments, egoistic motives, defensiveness, self-promotion" under views. So, removing greed, aversion and views.

            – ruben2020
            yesterday











            1















            And how, bhikkhus, does a bhikkhu exercise clear comprehension? Here, bhikkhus, for a bhikkhu feelings are understood as they arise,
            understood as they remain present, understood as they pass away.
            Thoughts are understood as they arise, understood as they remain
            present, understood as they pass away. Perceptions are understood as
            they arise, understood as they remain present, understood as they pass
            away. It is in this way, bhikkhus, that a bhikkhu exercises clear
            comprehension.



            SN 47.35




            The above means feelings, perceptions & thoughts are clearly understood in terms of the Dhamma, namely, they are impermanent, not-self, not to be clung to.



            Note: This is not vipassana, namely, observing arising & passing of feelings, perceptions & thoughts. It is understanding feelings, perceptions & thoughts, including when they are purposefully used. Thus, when speaking to another, for example, the mind understands: "These thoughts are conventions, subjective, not to be clung to, etc".




            And how, bhikkhus, does a bhikkhu exercise clear comprehension? Here, bhikkhus, a bhikkhu is one who acts with clear comprehension when
            going forward and returning; when looking ahead and looking aside;
            when drawing in and extending the limbs; when wearing his robes and
            carrying his outer robe and bowl; when eating, drinking, chewing his
            food, and tasting; when defecating and urinating; when walking,
            standing, sitting, falling asleep, waking up, speaking, and keeping
            silent. It is in such a way that a bhikkhu exercises clear
            comprehension.



            SN 47.2




            The above is exactly the same. When walking, the monk has clear-comprehension, such as: "I am monk; I must walk so I make a good public impression" or "I am a monk; I must eat non-hurriedly; so I make a good public impression"; or the monk reflects: "This walking is not self" (such as when Rahula was walking behind the Buddha in MN 62 and the Buddha rebuked Rahula for regarding the Buddha as a "self" or with "beauty").






            share|improve this answer





























              1















              And how, bhikkhus, does a bhikkhu exercise clear comprehension? Here, bhikkhus, for a bhikkhu feelings are understood as they arise,
              understood as they remain present, understood as they pass away.
              Thoughts are understood as they arise, understood as they remain
              present, understood as they pass away. Perceptions are understood as
              they arise, understood as they remain present, understood as they pass
              away. It is in this way, bhikkhus, that a bhikkhu exercises clear
              comprehension.



              SN 47.35




              The above means feelings, perceptions & thoughts are clearly understood in terms of the Dhamma, namely, they are impermanent, not-self, not to be clung to.



              Note: This is not vipassana, namely, observing arising & passing of feelings, perceptions & thoughts. It is understanding feelings, perceptions & thoughts, including when they are purposefully used. Thus, when speaking to another, for example, the mind understands: "These thoughts are conventions, subjective, not to be clung to, etc".




              And how, bhikkhus, does a bhikkhu exercise clear comprehension? Here, bhikkhus, a bhikkhu is one who acts with clear comprehension when
              going forward and returning; when looking ahead and looking aside;
              when drawing in and extending the limbs; when wearing his robes and
              carrying his outer robe and bowl; when eating, drinking, chewing his
              food, and tasting; when defecating and urinating; when walking,
              standing, sitting, falling asleep, waking up, speaking, and keeping
              silent. It is in such a way that a bhikkhu exercises clear
              comprehension.



              SN 47.2




              The above is exactly the same. When walking, the monk has clear-comprehension, such as: "I am monk; I must walk so I make a good public impression" or "I am a monk; I must eat non-hurriedly; so I make a good public impression"; or the monk reflects: "This walking is not self" (such as when Rahula was walking behind the Buddha in MN 62 and the Buddha rebuked Rahula for regarding the Buddha as a "self" or with "beauty").






              share|improve this answer



























                1












                1








                1








                And how, bhikkhus, does a bhikkhu exercise clear comprehension? Here, bhikkhus, for a bhikkhu feelings are understood as they arise,
                understood as they remain present, understood as they pass away.
                Thoughts are understood as they arise, understood as they remain
                present, understood as they pass away. Perceptions are understood as
                they arise, understood as they remain present, understood as they pass
                away. It is in this way, bhikkhus, that a bhikkhu exercises clear
                comprehension.



                SN 47.35




                The above means feelings, perceptions & thoughts are clearly understood in terms of the Dhamma, namely, they are impermanent, not-self, not to be clung to.



                Note: This is not vipassana, namely, observing arising & passing of feelings, perceptions & thoughts. It is understanding feelings, perceptions & thoughts, including when they are purposefully used. Thus, when speaking to another, for example, the mind understands: "These thoughts are conventions, subjective, not to be clung to, etc".




                And how, bhikkhus, does a bhikkhu exercise clear comprehension? Here, bhikkhus, a bhikkhu is one who acts with clear comprehension when
                going forward and returning; when looking ahead and looking aside;
                when drawing in and extending the limbs; when wearing his robes and
                carrying his outer robe and bowl; when eating, drinking, chewing his
                food, and tasting; when defecating and urinating; when walking,
                standing, sitting, falling asleep, waking up, speaking, and keeping
                silent. It is in such a way that a bhikkhu exercises clear
                comprehension.



                SN 47.2




                The above is exactly the same. When walking, the monk has clear-comprehension, such as: "I am monk; I must walk so I make a good public impression" or "I am a monk; I must eat non-hurriedly; so I make a good public impression"; or the monk reflects: "This walking is not self" (such as when Rahula was walking behind the Buddha in MN 62 and the Buddha rebuked Rahula for regarding the Buddha as a "self" or with "beauty").






                share|improve this answer
















                And how, bhikkhus, does a bhikkhu exercise clear comprehension? Here, bhikkhus, for a bhikkhu feelings are understood as they arise,
                understood as they remain present, understood as they pass away.
                Thoughts are understood as they arise, understood as they remain
                present, understood as they pass away. Perceptions are understood as
                they arise, understood as they remain present, understood as they pass
                away. It is in this way, bhikkhus, that a bhikkhu exercises clear
                comprehension.



                SN 47.35




                The above means feelings, perceptions & thoughts are clearly understood in terms of the Dhamma, namely, they are impermanent, not-self, not to be clung to.



                Note: This is not vipassana, namely, observing arising & passing of feelings, perceptions & thoughts. It is understanding feelings, perceptions & thoughts, including when they are purposefully used. Thus, when speaking to another, for example, the mind understands: "These thoughts are conventions, subjective, not to be clung to, etc".




                And how, bhikkhus, does a bhikkhu exercise clear comprehension? Here, bhikkhus, a bhikkhu is one who acts with clear comprehension when
                going forward and returning; when looking ahead and looking aside;
                when drawing in and extending the limbs; when wearing his robes and
                carrying his outer robe and bowl; when eating, drinking, chewing his
                food, and tasting; when defecating and urinating; when walking,
                standing, sitting, falling asleep, waking up, speaking, and keeping
                silent. It is in such a way that a bhikkhu exercises clear
                comprehension.



                SN 47.2




                The above is exactly the same. When walking, the monk has clear-comprehension, such as: "I am monk; I must walk so I make a good public impression" or "I am a monk; I must eat non-hurriedly; so I make a good public impression"; or the monk reflects: "This walking is not self" (such as when Rahula was walking behind the Buddha in MN 62 and the Buddha rebuked Rahula for regarding the Buddha as a "self" or with "beauty").







                share|improve this answer














                share|improve this answer



                share|improve this answer








                edited yesterday

























                answered yesterday









                DhammadhatuDhammadhatu

                25.6k11044




                25.6k11044



























                    draft saved

                    draft discarded
















































                    Thanks for contributing an answer to Buddhism Stack Exchange!


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid


                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function ()
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fbuddhism.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f31566%2frelationship-between-sampajanna-definitions-in-sn-47-2-and-sn-47-35%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                    );

                    Post as a guest















                    Required, but never shown





















































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown

































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown







                    Popular posts from this blog

                    He _____ here since 1970 . Answer needed [closed]What does “since he was so high” mean?Meaning of “catch birds for”?How do I ensure “since” takes the meaning I want?“Who cares here” meaningWhat does “right round toward” mean?the time tense (had now been detected)What does the phrase “ring around the roses” mean here?Correct usage of “visited upon”Meaning of “foiled rail sabotage bid”It was the third time I had gone to Rome or It is the third time I had been to Rome

                    Bunad

                    Færeyskur hestur Heimild | Tengill | Tilvísanir | LeiðsagnarvalRossið - síða um færeyska hrossið á færeyskuGott ár hjá færeyska hestinum