Grammatical Error: He is such a man who is liked by everyone [on hold]Error Grammatical - Use of preposition AGrammatical error in following sentenceIs it grammatically correct to use “who” for inanimate objects?Is this grammatical? “You are who I love.”Grammatical error in the followingWhat is the grammatical error in this sentence?Everyone's : everyone is conjunction“There is no man who has never looked upon a woman WITH/WITHOUT desire”Is this sentence correct? Nobody wants to pay for something they are not certain whether they will like it or notGrammatical Error

Why doesn't the fusion process of the sun speed up?

Don't understand why (5 | -2) > 0 is False where (5 or -2) > 0 is True

Splitting fasta file into smaller files based on header pattern

Turning a hard to access nut?

What will the french man say?

Did Nintendo change its mind about 68000 SNES?

Probabilities in non-stationary states

Should a narrator ever describe things based on a characters view instead of fact?

Hackerrank All Women's Codesprint 2019: Name the Product

How do hiring committees for research positions view getting "scooped"?

How can a new country break out from a developed country without war?

Do I need to convey a moral for each of my blog post?

Weird lines in Microsoft Word

Can other pieces capture a threatening piece and prevent a checkmate?

Air travel with refrigerated insulin

"Marked down as someone wanting to sell shares." What does that mean?

Why is "la Gestapo" feminine?

Why is this tree refusing to shed its dead leaves?

Why doesn't the chatan sign the ketubah?

Emojional cryptic crossword

Can "few" be used as a subject? If so, what is the rule?

Print a physical multiplication table

Would mining huge amounts of resources on the Moon change its orbit?

How can an organ that provides biological immortality be unable to regenerate?



Grammatical Error: He is such a man who is liked by everyone [on hold]


Error Grammatical - Use of preposition AGrammatical error in following sentenceIs it grammatically correct to use “who” for inanimate objects?Is this grammatical? “You are who I love.”Grammatical error in the followingWhat is the grammatical error in this sentence?Everyone's : everyone is conjunction“There is no man who has never looked upon a woman WITH/WITHOUT desire”Is this sentence correct? Nobody wants to pay for something they are not certain whether they will like it or notGrammatical Error













1















Is it grammatically correct?




He is such a man who is liked by everyone.











share|improve this question















put on hold as off-topic by Janus Bahs Jacquet, Mari-Lou A, J. Taylor, TrevorD, Rand al'Thor 6 hours ago


This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:


  • "Please include the research you’ve done, or consider if your question suits our English Language Learners site better. Questions that can be answered using commonly-available references are off-topic." – Janus Bahs Jacquet, Mari-Lou A, J. Taylor, Rand al'Thor
If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.











  • 1





    I am guessing that what you mean is, "He is the type of man who is liked by everyone." Is that correct?

    – chasly from UK
    yesterday






  • 1





    "such" with the meaning of "a member of a class" is more often used after the description than before because "such" in this sense needs the class to be defined or understood first. For instance "There are men who are liked by everyone: he is such a man." Another use of "such" is as an expression of degree, for example "He is such a pleasant man that he is liked by everyone." But this is using "such" in a different way.

    – BoldBen
    yesterday















1















Is it grammatically correct?




He is such a man who is liked by everyone.











share|improve this question















put on hold as off-topic by Janus Bahs Jacquet, Mari-Lou A, J. Taylor, TrevorD, Rand al'Thor 6 hours ago


This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:


  • "Please include the research you’ve done, or consider if your question suits our English Language Learners site better. Questions that can be answered using commonly-available references are off-topic." – Janus Bahs Jacquet, Mari-Lou A, J. Taylor, Rand al'Thor
If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.











  • 1





    I am guessing that what you mean is, "He is the type of man who is liked by everyone." Is that correct?

    – chasly from UK
    yesterday






  • 1





    "such" with the meaning of "a member of a class" is more often used after the description than before because "such" in this sense needs the class to be defined or understood first. For instance "There are men who are liked by everyone: he is such a man." Another use of "such" is as an expression of degree, for example "He is such a pleasant man that he is liked by everyone." But this is using "such" in a different way.

    – BoldBen
    yesterday













1












1








1








Is it grammatically correct?




He is such a man who is liked by everyone.











share|improve this question
















Is it grammatically correct?




He is such a man who is liked by everyone.








grammar sentence-correction






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited yesterday









Araucaria

35.5k1071149




35.5k1071149










asked yesterday









Mehtab MumtazMehtab Mumtaz

163




163




put on hold as off-topic by Janus Bahs Jacquet, Mari-Lou A, J. Taylor, TrevorD, Rand al'Thor 6 hours ago


This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:


  • "Please include the research you’ve done, or consider if your question suits our English Language Learners site better. Questions that can be answered using commonly-available references are off-topic." – Janus Bahs Jacquet, Mari-Lou A, J. Taylor, Rand al'Thor
If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.







put on hold as off-topic by Janus Bahs Jacquet, Mari-Lou A, J. Taylor, TrevorD, Rand al'Thor 6 hours ago


This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:


  • "Please include the research you’ve done, or consider if your question suits our English Language Learners site better. Questions that can be answered using commonly-available references are off-topic." – Janus Bahs Jacquet, Mari-Lou A, J. Taylor, Rand al'Thor
If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.







  • 1





    I am guessing that what you mean is, "He is the type of man who is liked by everyone." Is that correct?

    – chasly from UK
    yesterday






  • 1





    "such" with the meaning of "a member of a class" is more often used after the description than before because "such" in this sense needs the class to be defined or understood first. For instance "There are men who are liked by everyone: he is such a man." Another use of "such" is as an expression of degree, for example "He is such a pleasant man that he is liked by everyone." But this is using "such" in a different way.

    – BoldBen
    yesterday












  • 1





    I am guessing that what you mean is, "He is the type of man who is liked by everyone." Is that correct?

    – chasly from UK
    yesterday






  • 1





    "such" with the meaning of "a member of a class" is more often used after the description than before because "such" in this sense needs the class to be defined or understood first. For instance "There are men who are liked by everyone: he is such a man." Another use of "such" is as an expression of degree, for example "He is such a pleasant man that he is liked by everyone." But this is using "such" in a different way.

    – BoldBen
    yesterday







1




1





I am guessing that what you mean is, "He is the type of man who is liked by everyone." Is that correct?

– chasly from UK
yesterday





I am guessing that what you mean is, "He is the type of man who is liked by everyone." Is that correct?

– chasly from UK
yesterday




1




1





"such" with the meaning of "a member of a class" is more often used after the description than before because "such" in this sense needs the class to be defined or understood first. For instance "There are men who are liked by everyone: he is such a man." Another use of "such" is as an expression of degree, for example "He is such a pleasant man that he is liked by everyone." But this is using "such" in a different way.

– BoldBen
yesterday





"such" with the meaning of "a member of a class" is more often used after the description than before because "such" in this sense needs the class to be defined or understood first. For instance "There are men who are liked by everyone: he is such a man." Another use of "such" is as an expression of degree, for example "He is such a pleasant man that he is liked by everyone." But this is using "such" in a different way.

– BoldBen
yesterday










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















0














No, it is not grammatically correct. Here are your alternatives, assuming a conversation in which this type of man is being discussed, for example:



There are some men who are universally liked...




He is such a man, one who is liked by everyone.



He is such a man, one liked by everyone.




Or with [ellipsis] in a disjunct clause:




He is such a man— [he is one] who is liked by everyone.



He is such a man— [he is] liked by everyone.




Or :




He is a man who is liked by everyone.



He is a man liked by everyone.







share|improve this answer

























  • There are other alternatives, see my request for clarification above.

    – chasly from UK
    yesterday











  • @chaslyfromUK It looks to me like a standard grammar-book exercise on how to use such a... with a relative clause. With "the type" you've added an entirely unrelated alternative.

    – TRomano
    yesterday












  • Well, if grammar books give examples containing incorrect grammar without making the error clear then I have no confidence in such books. Let's see if the OP clarifies.

    – chasly from UK
    yesterday











  • Whatever the case, "the type" is from out in left field, as we baseball fans say. Why not also "the sort" and "the kind"?

    – TRomano
    yesterday












  • I'm not sure why we're arguing about this. I could indeed have used 'sort' or 'kind'. The fact is that I was using my experience of various translation forums to guess what the problem might be. I did however make it clear that I was guessing. You and I cannot resolve this. We must wait to see if the OP accepts your answer and/or replies to my comment.

    – chasly from UK
    yesterday


















1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









0














No, it is not grammatically correct. Here are your alternatives, assuming a conversation in which this type of man is being discussed, for example:



There are some men who are universally liked...




He is such a man, one who is liked by everyone.



He is such a man, one liked by everyone.




Or with [ellipsis] in a disjunct clause:




He is such a man— [he is one] who is liked by everyone.



He is such a man— [he is] liked by everyone.




Or :




He is a man who is liked by everyone.



He is a man liked by everyone.







share|improve this answer

























  • There are other alternatives, see my request for clarification above.

    – chasly from UK
    yesterday











  • @chaslyfromUK It looks to me like a standard grammar-book exercise on how to use such a... with a relative clause. With "the type" you've added an entirely unrelated alternative.

    – TRomano
    yesterday












  • Well, if grammar books give examples containing incorrect grammar without making the error clear then I have no confidence in such books. Let's see if the OP clarifies.

    – chasly from UK
    yesterday











  • Whatever the case, "the type" is from out in left field, as we baseball fans say. Why not also "the sort" and "the kind"?

    – TRomano
    yesterday












  • I'm not sure why we're arguing about this. I could indeed have used 'sort' or 'kind'. The fact is that I was using my experience of various translation forums to guess what the problem might be. I did however make it clear that I was guessing. You and I cannot resolve this. We must wait to see if the OP accepts your answer and/or replies to my comment.

    – chasly from UK
    yesterday
















0














No, it is not grammatically correct. Here are your alternatives, assuming a conversation in which this type of man is being discussed, for example:



There are some men who are universally liked...




He is such a man, one who is liked by everyone.



He is such a man, one liked by everyone.




Or with [ellipsis] in a disjunct clause:




He is such a man— [he is one] who is liked by everyone.



He is such a man— [he is] liked by everyone.




Or :




He is a man who is liked by everyone.



He is a man liked by everyone.







share|improve this answer

























  • There are other alternatives, see my request for clarification above.

    – chasly from UK
    yesterday











  • @chaslyfromUK It looks to me like a standard grammar-book exercise on how to use such a... with a relative clause. With "the type" you've added an entirely unrelated alternative.

    – TRomano
    yesterday












  • Well, if grammar books give examples containing incorrect grammar without making the error clear then I have no confidence in such books. Let's see if the OP clarifies.

    – chasly from UK
    yesterday











  • Whatever the case, "the type" is from out in left field, as we baseball fans say. Why not also "the sort" and "the kind"?

    – TRomano
    yesterday












  • I'm not sure why we're arguing about this. I could indeed have used 'sort' or 'kind'. The fact is that I was using my experience of various translation forums to guess what the problem might be. I did however make it clear that I was guessing. You and I cannot resolve this. We must wait to see if the OP accepts your answer and/or replies to my comment.

    – chasly from UK
    yesterday














0












0








0







No, it is not grammatically correct. Here are your alternatives, assuming a conversation in which this type of man is being discussed, for example:



There are some men who are universally liked...




He is such a man, one who is liked by everyone.



He is such a man, one liked by everyone.




Or with [ellipsis] in a disjunct clause:




He is such a man— [he is one] who is liked by everyone.



He is such a man— [he is] liked by everyone.




Or :




He is a man who is liked by everyone.



He is a man liked by everyone.







share|improve this answer















No, it is not grammatically correct. Here are your alternatives, assuming a conversation in which this type of man is being discussed, for example:



There are some men who are universally liked...




He is such a man, one who is liked by everyone.



He is such a man, one liked by everyone.




Or with [ellipsis] in a disjunct clause:




He is such a man— [he is one] who is liked by everyone.



He is such a man— [he is] liked by everyone.




Or :




He is a man who is liked by everyone.



He is a man liked by everyone.








share|improve this answer














share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer








edited yesterday

























answered yesterday









TRomanoTRomano

17.3k21946




17.3k21946












  • There are other alternatives, see my request for clarification above.

    – chasly from UK
    yesterday











  • @chaslyfromUK It looks to me like a standard grammar-book exercise on how to use such a... with a relative clause. With "the type" you've added an entirely unrelated alternative.

    – TRomano
    yesterday












  • Well, if grammar books give examples containing incorrect grammar without making the error clear then I have no confidence in such books. Let's see if the OP clarifies.

    – chasly from UK
    yesterday











  • Whatever the case, "the type" is from out in left field, as we baseball fans say. Why not also "the sort" and "the kind"?

    – TRomano
    yesterday












  • I'm not sure why we're arguing about this. I could indeed have used 'sort' or 'kind'. The fact is that I was using my experience of various translation forums to guess what the problem might be. I did however make it clear that I was guessing. You and I cannot resolve this. We must wait to see if the OP accepts your answer and/or replies to my comment.

    – chasly from UK
    yesterday


















  • There are other alternatives, see my request for clarification above.

    – chasly from UK
    yesterday











  • @chaslyfromUK It looks to me like a standard grammar-book exercise on how to use such a... with a relative clause. With "the type" you've added an entirely unrelated alternative.

    – TRomano
    yesterday












  • Well, if grammar books give examples containing incorrect grammar without making the error clear then I have no confidence in such books. Let's see if the OP clarifies.

    – chasly from UK
    yesterday











  • Whatever the case, "the type" is from out in left field, as we baseball fans say. Why not also "the sort" and "the kind"?

    – TRomano
    yesterday












  • I'm not sure why we're arguing about this. I could indeed have used 'sort' or 'kind'. The fact is that I was using my experience of various translation forums to guess what the problem might be. I did however make it clear that I was guessing. You and I cannot resolve this. We must wait to see if the OP accepts your answer and/or replies to my comment.

    – chasly from UK
    yesterday

















There are other alternatives, see my request for clarification above.

– chasly from UK
yesterday





There are other alternatives, see my request for clarification above.

– chasly from UK
yesterday













@chaslyfromUK It looks to me like a standard grammar-book exercise on how to use such a... with a relative clause. With "the type" you've added an entirely unrelated alternative.

– TRomano
yesterday






@chaslyfromUK It looks to me like a standard grammar-book exercise on how to use such a... with a relative clause. With "the type" you've added an entirely unrelated alternative.

– TRomano
yesterday














Well, if grammar books give examples containing incorrect grammar without making the error clear then I have no confidence in such books. Let's see if the OP clarifies.

– chasly from UK
yesterday





Well, if grammar books give examples containing incorrect grammar without making the error clear then I have no confidence in such books. Let's see if the OP clarifies.

– chasly from UK
yesterday













Whatever the case, "the type" is from out in left field, as we baseball fans say. Why not also "the sort" and "the kind"?

– TRomano
yesterday






Whatever the case, "the type" is from out in left field, as we baseball fans say. Why not also "the sort" and "the kind"?

– TRomano
yesterday














I'm not sure why we're arguing about this. I could indeed have used 'sort' or 'kind'. The fact is that I was using my experience of various translation forums to guess what the problem might be. I did however make it clear that I was guessing. You and I cannot resolve this. We must wait to see if the OP accepts your answer and/or replies to my comment.

– chasly from UK
yesterday






I'm not sure why we're arguing about this. I could indeed have used 'sort' or 'kind'. The fact is that I was using my experience of various translation forums to guess what the problem might be. I did however make it clear that I was guessing. You and I cannot resolve this. We must wait to see if the OP accepts your answer and/or replies to my comment.

– chasly from UK
yesterday




Popular posts from this blog

He _____ here since 1970 . Answer needed [closed]What does “since he was so high” mean?Meaning of “catch birds for”?How do I ensure “since” takes the meaning I want?“Who cares here” meaningWhat does “right round toward” mean?the time tense (had now been detected)What does the phrase “ring around the roses” mean here?Correct usage of “visited upon”Meaning of “foiled rail sabotage bid”It was the third time I had gone to Rome or It is the third time I had been to Rome

Bunad

Færeyskur hestur Heimild | Tengill | Tilvísanir | LeiðsagnarvalRossið - síða um færeyska hrossið á færeyskuGott ár hjá færeyska hestinum