The use of tense in technical writing [on hold]





.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty{ margin-bottom:0;
}







-1















I am having trouble writing a technical document where the present and future activities are described theoretically. For instance:




Study A plans to enroll 300 patients. Patients shall have either
diagnosed mild cognitive decline or prior hospitalization for fall as
documented by medical records.




Are these two sentences inconsistent in how they are written? What is the tense used in both cases?










share|improve this question













put on hold as off-topic by Jason Bassford, TrevorD, Chappo, JJJ, Neeku 7 hours ago


This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:


  • "Please include the research you’ve done, or consider if your question suits our English Language Learners site better. Questions that can be answered using commonly-available references are off-topic." – JJJ, Neeku

If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.























    -1















    I am having trouble writing a technical document where the present and future activities are described theoretically. For instance:




    Study A plans to enroll 300 patients. Patients shall have either
    diagnosed mild cognitive decline or prior hospitalization for fall as
    documented by medical records.




    Are these two sentences inconsistent in how they are written? What is the tense used in both cases?










    share|improve this question













    put on hold as off-topic by Jason Bassford, TrevorD, Chappo, JJJ, Neeku 7 hours ago


    This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:


    • "Please include the research you’ve done, or consider if your question suits our English Language Learners site better. Questions that can be answered using commonly-available references are off-topic." – JJJ, Neeku

    If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.



















      -1












      -1








      -1








      I am having trouble writing a technical document where the present and future activities are described theoretically. For instance:




      Study A plans to enroll 300 patients. Patients shall have either
      diagnosed mild cognitive decline or prior hospitalization for fall as
      documented by medical records.




      Are these two sentences inconsistent in how they are written? What is the tense used in both cases?










      share|improve this question














      I am having trouble writing a technical document where the present and future activities are described theoretically. For instance:




      Study A plans to enroll 300 patients. Patients shall have either
      diagnosed mild cognitive decline or prior hospitalization for fall as
      documented by medical records.




      Are these two sentences inconsistent in how they are written? What is the tense used in both cases?







      tenses tech-writing






      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question











      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question










      asked Apr 18 at 16:49









      AdamOAdamO

      1364




      1364




      put on hold as off-topic by Jason Bassford, TrevorD, Chappo, JJJ, Neeku 7 hours ago


      This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:


      • "Please include the research you’ve done, or consider if your question suits our English Language Learners site better. Questions that can be answered using commonly-available references are off-topic." – JJJ, Neeku

      If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.







      put on hold as off-topic by Jason Bassford, TrevorD, Chappo, JJJ, Neeku 7 hours ago


      This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:


      • "Please include the research you’ve done, or consider if your question suits our English Language Learners site better. Questions that can be answered using commonly-available references are off-topic." – JJJ, Neeku

      If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.






















          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          -1














          The first sentence is in the present tense: "Study A plans"



          The second sentence is in the future tense, but poor word choice makes it look like it's in the future perfect.



          We can see the intended structure more clearly if we ignore the first condition of the "either": "Patients shall have...prior hospitalization"



          That is, the patients will possess a prior hospitalization - that's not idiomatic, but makes the structure even clearer. The point is, have is not an auxiliary verb, it's a bare infinitive meaning possess and thus, diagnosed is not a verb at all, it's an adjective.



          It's not "patients will have been diagnosed with mild cognitive decline," it's "patients will have mild cognitive decline that has been diagnosed."






          share|improve this answer
























          • A patient can be diagnosed with mild cognitive decline in a clinic and never be hospitalized. They would be eligible to enroll in the study at that point. Maybe I'm missing your point?

            – AdamO
            Apr 18 at 17:22











          • @AdamO, I'm making about point about the grammar and the tenses, not about the connection between hospitalization and diagnosis. The second sentence is in the simple future tense and the structure is essentially: "Patients will either have a condition, or have a prior hospitalization"

            – Juhasz
            Apr 18 at 17:51



















          -1














          [Updated because coffee.]




          Study "A" plans to enroll 300 patients.




          Present tense.



          Your 2nd sentence then reads:




          Patients shall have either diagnosed mild cognitive decline or prior hospitalization for fall as documented by medical records.




          "shall" is the actual simple future ("will" being the volitional mood). So, when the proposal is adopted and the plan is put in place in the future, when we pick patients, they shall bear these characteristics: ... . But when you do that, the diagnosis must have logically occurred in the past, so I would consider modifying the sentence with something like the perfect aspect, as follows:




          Patients shall either have been diagnosed with mild cognitive decline or have had prior hospitalization for fall, as documented by medical records.







          share|improve this answer


























          • "Study A" is a proper noun. Sorry that wasn't clear.

            – AdamO
            Apr 18 at 17:23











          • ah lol i need coffee. answer p1 updated, pt 2 had error corrected

            – Carly
            Apr 18 at 17:56


















          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes








          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes









          -1














          The first sentence is in the present tense: "Study A plans"



          The second sentence is in the future tense, but poor word choice makes it look like it's in the future perfect.



          We can see the intended structure more clearly if we ignore the first condition of the "either": "Patients shall have...prior hospitalization"



          That is, the patients will possess a prior hospitalization - that's not idiomatic, but makes the structure even clearer. The point is, have is not an auxiliary verb, it's a bare infinitive meaning possess and thus, diagnosed is not a verb at all, it's an adjective.



          It's not "patients will have been diagnosed with mild cognitive decline," it's "patients will have mild cognitive decline that has been diagnosed."






          share|improve this answer
























          • A patient can be diagnosed with mild cognitive decline in a clinic and never be hospitalized. They would be eligible to enroll in the study at that point. Maybe I'm missing your point?

            – AdamO
            Apr 18 at 17:22











          • @AdamO, I'm making about point about the grammar and the tenses, not about the connection between hospitalization and diagnosis. The second sentence is in the simple future tense and the structure is essentially: "Patients will either have a condition, or have a prior hospitalization"

            – Juhasz
            Apr 18 at 17:51
















          -1














          The first sentence is in the present tense: "Study A plans"



          The second sentence is in the future tense, but poor word choice makes it look like it's in the future perfect.



          We can see the intended structure more clearly if we ignore the first condition of the "either": "Patients shall have...prior hospitalization"



          That is, the patients will possess a prior hospitalization - that's not idiomatic, but makes the structure even clearer. The point is, have is not an auxiliary verb, it's a bare infinitive meaning possess and thus, diagnosed is not a verb at all, it's an adjective.



          It's not "patients will have been diagnosed with mild cognitive decline," it's "patients will have mild cognitive decline that has been diagnosed."






          share|improve this answer
























          • A patient can be diagnosed with mild cognitive decline in a clinic and never be hospitalized. They would be eligible to enroll in the study at that point. Maybe I'm missing your point?

            – AdamO
            Apr 18 at 17:22











          • @AdamO, I'm making about point about the grammar and the tenses, not about the connection between hospitalization and diagnosis. The second sentence is in the simple future tense and the structure is essentially: "Patients will either have a condition, or have a prior hospitalization"

            – Juhasz
            Apr 18 at 17:51














          -1












          -1








          -1







          The first sentence is in the present tense: "Study A plans"



          The second sentence is in the future tense, but poor word choice makes it look like it's in the future perfect.



          We can see the intended structure more clearly if we ignore the first condition of the "either": "Patients shall have...prior hospitalization"



          That is, the patients will possess a prior hospitalization - that's not idiomatic, but makes the structure even clearer. The point is, have is not an auxiliary verb, it's a bare infinitive meaning possess and thus, diagnosed is not a verb at all, it's an adjective.



          It's not "patients will have been diagnosed with mild cognitive decline," it's "patients will have mild cognitive decline that has been diagnosed."






          share|improve this answer













          The first sentence is in the present tense: "Study A plans"



          The second sentence is in the future tense, but poor word choice makes it look like it's in the future perfect.



          We can see the intended structure more clearly if we ignore the first condition of the "either": "Patients shall have...prior hospitalization"



          That is, the patients will possess a prior hospitalization - that's not idiomatic, but makes the structure even clearer. The point is, have is not an auxiliary verb, it's a bare infinitive meaning possess and thus, diagnosed is not a verb at all, it's an adjective.



          It's not "patients will have been diagnosed with mild cognitive decline," it's "patients will have mild cognitive decline that has been diagnosed."







          share|improve this answer












          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer










          answered Apr 18 at 17:10









          JuhaszJuhasz

          3,7381915




          3,7381915













          • A patient can be diagnosed with mild cognitive decline in a clinic and never be hospitalized. They would be eligible to enroll in the study at that point. Maybe I'm missing your point?

            – AdamO
            Apr 18 at 17:22











          • @AdamO, I'm making about point about the grammar and the tenses, not about the connection between hospitalization and diagnosis. The second sentence is in the simple future tense and the structure is essentially: "Patients will either have a condition, or have a prior hospitalization"

            – Juhasz
            Apr 18 at 17:51



















          • A patient can be diagnosed with mild cognitive decline in a clinic and never be hospitalized. They would be eligible to enroll in the study at that point. Maybe I'm missing your point?

            – AdamO
            Apr 18 at 17:22











          • @AdamO, I'm making about point about the grammar and the tenses, not about the connection between hospitalization and diagnosis. The second sentence is in the simple future tense and the structure is essentially: "Patients will either have a condition, or have a prior hospitalization"

            – Juhasz
            Apr 18 at 17:51

















          A patient can be diagnosed with mild cognitive decline in a clinic and never be hospitalized. They would be eligible to enroll in the study at that point. Maybe I'm missing your point?

          – AdamO
          Apr 18 at 17:22





          A patient can be diagnosed with mild cognitive decline in a clinic and never be hospitalized. They would be eligible to enroll in the study at that point. Maybe I'm missing your point?

          – AdamO
          Apr 18 at 17:22













          @AdamO, I'm making about point about the grammar and the tenses, not about the connection between hospitalization and diagnosis. The second sentence is in the simple future tense and the structure is essentially: "Patients will either have a condition, or have a prior hospitalization"

          – Juhasz
          Apr 18 at 17:51





          @AdamO, I'm making about point about the grammar and the tenses, not about the connection between hospitalization and diagnosis. The second sentence is in the simple future tense and the structure is essentially: "Patients will either have a condition, or have a prior hospitalization"

          – Juhasz
          Apr 18 at 17:51













          -1














          [Updated because coffee.]




          Study "A" plans to enroll 300 patients.




          Present tense.



          Your 2nd sentence then reads:




          Patients shall have either diagnosed mild cognitive decline or prior hospitalization for fall as documented by medical records.




          "shall" is the actual simple future ("will" being the volitional mood). So, when the proposal is adopted and the plan is put in place in the future, when we pick patients, they shall bear these characteristics: ... . But when you do that, the diagnosis must have logically occurred in the past, so I would consider modifying the sentence with something like the perfect aspect, as follows:




          Patients shall either have been diagnosed with mild cognitive decline or have had prior hospitalization for fall, as documented by medical records.







          share|improve this answer


























          • "Study A" is a proper noun. Sorry that wasn't clear.

            – AdamO
            Apr 18 at 17:23











          • ah lol i need coffee. answer p1 updated, pt 2 had error corrected

            – Carly
            Apr 18 at 17:56
















          -1














          [Updated because coffee.]




          Study "A" plans to enroll 300 patients.




          Present tense.



          Your 2nd sentence then reads:




          Patients shall have either diagnosed mild cognitive decline or prior hospitalization for fall as documented by medical records.




          "shall" is the actual simple future ("will" being the volitional mood). So, when the proposal is adopted and the plan is put in place in the future, when we pick patients, they shall bear these characteristics: ... . But when you do that, the diagnosis must have logically occurred in the past, so I would consider modifying the sentence with something like the perfect aspect, as follows:




          Patients shall either have been diagnosed with mild cognitive decline or have had prior hospitalization for fall, as documented by medical records.







          share|improve this answer


























          • "Study A" is a proper noun. Sorry that wasn't clear.

            – AdamO
            Apr 18 at 17:23











          • ah lol i need coffee. answer p1 updated, pt 2 had error corrected

            – Carly
            Apr 18 at 17:56














          -1












          -1








          -1







          [Updated because coffee.]




          Study "A" plans to enroll 300 patients.




          Present tense.



          Your 2nd sentence then reads:




          Patients shall have either diagnosed mild cognitive decline or prior hospitalization for fall as documented by medical records.




          "shall" is the actual simple future ("will" being the volitional mood). So, when the proposal is adopted and the plan is put in place in the future, when we pick patients, they shall bear these characteristics: ... . But when you do that, the diagnosis must have logically occurred in the past, so I would consider modifying the sentence with something like the perfect aspect, as follows:




          Patients shall either have been diagnosed with mild cognitive decline or have had prior hospitalization for fall, as documented by medical records.







          share|improve this answer















          [Updated because coffee.]




          Study "A" plans to enroll 300 patients.




          Present tense.



          Your 2nd sentence then reads:




          Patients shall have either diagnosed mild cognitive decline or prior hospitalization for fall as documented by medical records.




          "shall" is the actual simple future ("will" being the volitional mood). So, when the proposal is adopted and the plan is put in place in the future, when we pick patients, they shall bear these characteristics: ... . But when you do that, the diagnosis must have logically occurred in the past, so I would consider modifying the sentence with something like the perfect aspect, as follows:




          Patients shall either have been diagnosed with mild cognitive decline or have had prior hospitalization for fall, as documented by medical records.








          share|improve this answer














          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer








          edited Apr 18 at 17:55

























          answered Apr 18 at 17:10









          CarlyCarly

          1,668213




          1,668213













          • "Study A" is a proper noun. Sorry that wasn't clear.

            – AdamO
            Apr 18 at 17:23











          • ah lol i need coffee. answer p1 updated, pt 2 had error corrected

            – Carly
            Apr 18 at 17:56



















          • "Study A" is a proper noun. Sorry that wasn't clear.

            – AdamO
            Apr 18 at 17:23











          • ah lol i need coffee. answer p1 updated, pt 2 had error corrected

            – Carly
            Apr 18 at 17:56

















          "Study A" is a proper noun. Sorry that wasn't clear.

          – AdamO
          Apr 18 at 17:23





          "Study A" is a proper noun. Sorry that wasn't clear.

          – AdamO
          Apr 18 at 17:23













          ah lol i need coffee. answer p1 updated, pt 2 had error corrected

          – Carly
          Apr 18 at 17:56





          ah lol i need coffee. answer p1 updated, pt 2 had error corrected

          – Carly
          Apr 18 at 17:56



          Popular posts from this blog

          Bruad Bilen | Luke uk diar | NawigatsjuunCommonskategorii: BruadCommonskategorii: RunstükenWikiquote: Bruad

          What is the offset in a seaplane's hull?

          Slayer Innehåll Historia | Stil, komposition och lyrik | Bandets betydelse och framgångar | Sidoprojekt och samarbeten | Kontroverser | Medlemmar | Utmärkelser och nomineringar | Turnéer och festivaler | Diskografi | Referenser | Externa länkar | Navigeringsmenywww.slayer.net”Metal Massacre vol. 1””Metal Massacre vol. 3””Metal Massacre Volume III””Show No Mercy””Haunting the Chapel””Live Undead””Hell Awaits””Reign in Blood””Reign in Blood””Gold & Platinum – Reign in Blood””Golden Gods Awards Winners”originalet”Kerrang! Hall Of Fame””Slayer Looks Back On 37-Year Career In New Video Series: Part Two””South of Heaven””Gold & Platinum – South of Heaven””Seasons in the Abyss””Gold & Platinum - Seasons in the Abyss””Divine Intervention””Divine Intervention - Release group by Slayer””Gold & Platinum - Divine Intervention””Live Intrusion””Undisputed Attitude””Abolish Government/Superficial Love””Release “Slatanic Slaughter: A Tribute to Slayer” by Various Artists””Diabolus in Musica””Soundtrack to the Apocalypse””God Hates Us All””Systematic - Relationships””War at the Warfield””Gold & Platinum - War at the Warfield””Soundtrack to the Apocalypse””Gold & Platinum - Still Reigning””Metallica, Slayer, Iron Mauden Among Winners At Metal Hammer Awards””Eternal Pyre””Eternal Pyre - Slayer release group””Eternal Pyre””Metal Storm Awards 2006””Kerrang! Hall Of Fame””Slayer Wins 'Best Metal' Grammy Award””Slayer Guitarist Jeff Hanneman Dies””Bullet-For My Valentine booed at Metal Hammer Golden Gods Awards””Unholy Aliance””The End Of Slayer?””Slayer: We Could Thrash Out Two More Albums If We're Fast Enough...””'The Unholy Alliance: Chapter III' UK Dates Added”originalet”Megadeth And Slayer To Co-Headline 'Canadian Carnage' Trek”originalet”World Painted Blood””Release “World Painted Blood” by Slayer””Metallica Heading To Cinemas””Slayer, Megadeth To Join Forces For 'European Carnage' Tour - Dec. 18, 2010”originalet”Slayer's Hanneman Contracts Acute Infection; Band To Bring In Guest Guitarist””Cannibal Corpse's Pat O'Brien Will Step In As Slayer's Guest Guitarist”originalet”Slayer’s Jeff Hanneman Dead at 49””Dave Lombardo Says He Made Only $67,000 In 2011 While Touring With Slayer””Slayer: We Do Not Agree With Dave Lombardo's Substance Or Timeline Of Events””Slayer Welcomes Drummer Paul Bostaph Back To The Fold””Slayer Hope to Unveil Never-Before-Heard Jeff Hanneman Material on Next Album””Slayer Debut New Song 'Implode' During Surprise Golden Gods Appearance””Release group Repentless by Slayer””Repentless - Slayer - Credits””Slayer””Metal Storm Awards 2015””Slayer - to release comic book "Repentless #1"””Slayer To Release 'Repentless' 6.66" Vinyl Box Set””BREAKING NEWS: Slayer Announce Farewell Tour””Slayer Recruit Lamb of God, Anthrax, Behemoth + Testament for Final Tour””Slayer lägger ner efter 37 år””Slayer Announces Second North American Leg Of 'Final' Tour””Final World Tour””Slayer Announces Final European Tour With Lamb of God, Anthrax And Obituary””Slayer To Tour Europe With Lamb of God, Anthrax And Obituary””Slayer To Play 'Last French Show Ever' At Next Year's Hellfst””Slayer's Final World Tour Will Extend Into 2019””Death Angel's Rob Cavestany On Slayer's 'Farewell' Tour: 'Some Of Us Could See This Coming'””Testament Has No Plans To Retire Anytime Soon, Says Chuck Billy””Anthrax's Scott Ian On Slayer's 'Farewell' Tour Plans: 'I Was Surprised And I Wasn't Surprised'””Slayer””Slayer's Morbid Schlock””Review/Rock; For Slayer, the Mania Is the Message””Slayer - Biography””Slayer - Reign In Blood”originalet”Dave Lombardo””An exclusive oral history of Slayer”originalet”Exclusive! Interview With Slayer Guitarist Jeff Hanneman”originalet”Thinking Out Loud: Slayer's Kerry King on hair metal, Satan and being polite””Slayer Lyrics””Slayer - Biography””Most influential artists for extreme metal music””Slayer - Reign in Blood””Slayer guitarist Jeff Hanneman dies aged 49””Slatanic Slaughter: A Tribute to Slayer””Gateway to Hell: A Tribute to Slayer””Covered In Blood””Slayer: The Origins of Thrash in San Francisco, CA.””Why They Rule - #6 Slayer”originalet”Guitar World's 100 Greatest Heavy Metal Guitarists Of All Time”originalet”The fans have spoken: Slayer comes out on top in readers' polls”originalet”Tribute to Jeff Hanneman (1964-2013)””Lamb Of God Frontman: We Sound Like A Slayer Rip-Off””BEHEMOTH Frontman Pays Tribute To SLAYER's JEFF HANNEMAN””Slayer, Hatebreed Doing Double Duty On This Year's Ozzfest””System of a Down””Lacuna Coil’s Andrea Ferro Talks Influences, Skateboarding, Band Origins + More””Slayer - Reign in Blood””Into The Lungs of Hell””Slayer rules - en utställning om fans””Slayer and Their Fans Slashed Through a No-Holds-Barred Night at Gas Monkey””Home””Slayer””Gold & Platinum - The Big 4 Live from Sofia, Bulgaria””Exclusive! Interview With Slayer Guitarist Kerry King””2008-02-23: Wiltern, Los Angeles, CA, USA””Slayer's Kerry King To Perform With Megadeth Tonight! - Oct. 21, 2010”originalet”Dave Lombardo - Biography”Slayer Case DismissedArkiveradUltimate Classic Rock: Slayer guitarist Jeff Hanneman dead at 49.”Slayer: "We could never do any thing like Some Kind Of Monster..."””Cannibal Corpse'S Pat O'Brien Will Step In As Slayer'S Guest Guitarist | The Official Slayer Site”originalet”Slayer Wins 'Best Metal' Grammy Award””Slayer Guitarist Jeff Hanneman Dies””Kerrang! Awards 2006 Blog: Kerrang! Hall Of Fame””Kerrang! Awards 2013: Kerrang! Legend”originalet”Metallica, Slayer, Iron Maien Among Winners At Metal Hammer Awards””Metal Hammer Golden Gods Awards””Bullet For My Valentine Booed At Metal Hammer Golden Gods Awards””Metal Storm Awards 2006””Metal Storm Awards 2015””Slayer's Concert History””Slayer - Relationships””Slayer - Releases”Slayers officiella webbplatsSlayer på MusicBrainzOfficiell webbplatsSlayerSlayerr1373445760000 0001 1540 47353068615-5086262726cb13906545x(data)6033143kn20030215029