What will be the temperature on Earth when Sun finishes its main sequence?












4












$begingroup$


We know that presently Sun is 4.5 billion years into its main sequence. It has another 5 billion years before it enters the Red Giant phase. We also know that Sun's luminosity increases by 10% every billion years during the main sequence. I am interested in finding the temperature rise as we approach the end of main sequence. I got two different values for temperature on Earth.



Wikipedia entry says that temperature on Earth would be 422 k in 2.8 billion years. However, if we use the formula for effective temperature as discussed in this answer
https://earthscience.stackexchange.com/a/4274/15299 and L = 1.8 then, the temperature on Earth would be 330K. Also in this book, the author does the same calculations on page 255.










share|improve this question











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    @arkaia I have shared another answer in the question which is similar and was answered by experts here. I request you to let my question stay here as there are many intelligent folks here who may resolve this question quickly.
    $endgroup$
    – sidharth chhabra
    23 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    @arkaia It is true that this question has a lot of astronomy, but heat balance and effective temperature is Earth Science-ish, and if somebody masters an answer including greenhouse effect, that would definitely be Earth Sciences.
    $endgroup$
    – Camilo Rada
    22 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    I understand your point. Close vote removed
    $endgroup$
    – arkaia
    21 hours ago
















4












$begingroup$


We know that presently Sun is 4.5 billion years into its main sequence. It has another 5 billion years before it enters the Red Giant phase. We also know that Sun's luminosity increases by 10% every billion years during the main sequence. I am interested in finding the temperature rise as we approach the end of main sequence. I got two different values for temperature on Earth.



Wikipedia entry says that temperature on Earth would be 422 k in 2.8 billion years. However, if we use the formula for effective temperature as discussed in this answer
https://earthscience.stackexchange.com/a/4274/15299 and L = 1.8 then, the temperature on Earth would be 330K. Also in this book, the author does the same calculations on page 255.










share|improve this question











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    @arkaia I have shared another answer in the question which is similar and was answered by experts here. I request you to let my question stay here as there are many intelligent folks here who may resolve this question quickly.
    $endgroup$
    – sidharth chhabra
    23 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    @arkaia It is true that this question has a lot of astronomy, but heat balance and effective temperature is Earth Science-ish, and if somebody masters an answer including greenhouse effect, that would definitely be Earth Sciences.
    $endgroup$
    – Camilo Rada
    22 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    I understand your point. Close vote removed
    $endgroup$
    – arkaia
    21 hours ago














4












4








4





$begingroup$


We know that presently Sun is 4.5 billion years into its main sequence. It has another 5 billion years before it enters the Red Giant phase. We also know that Sun's luminosity increases by 10% every billion years during the main sequence. I am interested in finding the temperature rise as we approach the end of main sequence. I got two different values for temperature on Earth.



Wikipedia entry says that temperature on Earth would be 422 k in 2.8 billion years. However, if we use the formula for effective temperature as discussed in this answer
https://earthscience.stackexchange.com/a/4274/15299 and L = 1.8 then, the temperature on Earth would be 330K. Also in this book, the author does the same calculations on page 255.










share|improve this question











$endgroup$




We know that presently Sun is 4.5 billion years into its main sequence. It has another 5 billion years before it enters the Red Giant phase. We also know that Sun's luminosity increases by 10% every billion years during the main sequence. I am interested in finding the temperature rise as we approach the end of main sequence. I got two different values for temperature on Earth.



Wikipedia entry says that temperature on Earth would be 422 k in 2.8 billion years. However, if we use the formula for effective temperature as discussed in this answer
https://earthscience.stackexchange.com/a/4274/15299 and L = 1.8 then, the temperature on Earth would be 330K. Also in this book, the author does the same calculations on page 255.







geophysics hypothetical astronomy energy-balance






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited 20 hours ago









Camilo Rada

13.5k54396




13.5k54396










asked yesterday









sidharth chhabrasidharth chhabra

1634




1634












  • $begingroup$
    @arkaia I have shared another answer in the question which is similar and was answered by experts here. I request you to let my question stay here as there are many intelligent folks here who may resolve this question quickly.
    $endgroup$
    – sidharth chhabra
    23 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    @arkaia It is true that this question has a lot of astronomy, but heat balance and effective temperature is Earth Science-ish, and if somebody masters an answer including greenhouse effect, that would definitely be Earth Sciences.
    $endgroup$
    – Camilo Rada
    22 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    I understand your point. Close vote removed
    $endgroup$
    – arkaia
    21 hours ago


















  • $begingroup$
    @arkaia I have shared another answer in the question which is similar and was answered by experts here. I request you to let my question stay here as there are many intelligent folks here who may resolve this question quickly.
    $endgroup$
    – sidharth chhabra
    23 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    @arkaia It is true that this question has a lot of astronomy, but heat balance and effective temperature is Earth Science-ish, and if somebody masters an answer including greenhouse effect, that would definitely be Earth Sciences.
    $endgroup$
    – Camilo Rada
    22 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    I understand your point. Close vote removed
    $endgroup$
    – arkaia
    21 hours ago
















$begingroup$
@arkaia I have shared another answer in the question which is similar and was answered by experts here. I request you to let my question stay here as there are many intelligent folks here who may resolve this question quickly.
$endgroup$
– sidharth chhabra
23 hours ago




$begingroup$
@arkaia I have shared another answer in the question which is similar and was answered by experts here. I request you to let my question stay here as there are many intelligent folks here who may resolve this question quickly.
$endgroup$
– sidharth chhabra
23 hours ago












$begingroup$
@arkaia It is true that this question has a lot of astronomy, but heat balance and effective temperature is Earth Science-ish, and if somebody masters an answer including greenhouse effect, that would definitely be Earth Sciences.
$endgroup$
– Camilo Rada
22 hours ago




$begingroup$
@arkaia It is true that this question has a lot of astronomy, but heat balance and effective temperature is Earth Science-ish, and if somebody masters an answer including greenhouse effect, that would definitely be Earth Sciences.
$endgroup$
– Camilo Rada
22 hours ago




1




1




$begingroup$
I understand your point. Close vote removed
$endgroup$
– arkaia
21 hours ago




$begingroup$
I understand your point. Close vote removed
$endgroup$
– arkaia
21 hours ago










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















4












$begingroup$

Answers will be different because they must be tied to a model of solar evolution, and all models are a bit different.



So to answer your question we have to select a model. A pretty standard and trusted one, is the one used in the paper Stellar evolution models for Z = 0.0001 to 0.03. Where Z stands for the metalicity of the star, that for the Sun they indicate would be 0.0188.



In figure 2, they show the trajectory of a star like the sun in the H-R diagram (look for the line labeled "1.0").



enter image description here



The data output of this model is available at the VizieR catalog. I just downloaded the data for starts of one solar mass and Z=0.02 (like the Sun), and computed the effective temperature of Earth using the formula in the linked question



$Large frac{T}{T_0}=left(frac{L}{L_0}right)^{frac{1}{4}}$



Using a current effective temperature $T_0$ of -19°C (you will find values between -18 and -21°C), we get that the plot pf Luminosity and temperature versus time looks like this



enter image description here



And given that you are interested in specific values here is some tabulated data including also the solar radius. Note that most of these points are linear interpolations of the original data, that had only six points in this age range.



Age         Radius      Lumin.  Temperature
[Billion [solar [Solar [°C]
years] radius] Lumin.]
0.00 0.89 0.7 -41.4
0.25 0.90 0.7 -40.2
0.50 0.91 0.7 -39.0
0.75 0.91 0.7 -37.8
1.00 0.92 0.8 -36.6
1.25 0.93 0.8 -35.4
1.50 0.94 0.8 -34.2
1.75 0.95 0.8 -32.9
2.00 0.95 0.8 -31.7
2.25 0.96 0.8 -30.4
2.50 0.97 0.8 -29.2
2.75 0.98 0.9 -27.9
3.00 0.99 0.9 -26.7
3.25 1.00 0.9 -25.4
3.50 1.00 0.9 -24.1
3.75 1.01 0.9 -22.8
4.00 1.02 1.0 -21.5
4.25 1.03 1.0 -20.2
4.50 1.04 1.0 -18.9
4.75 1.05 1.0 -17.6
5.00 1.06 1.0 -16.3
5.25 1.07 1.1 -15.0
5.50 1.08 1.1 -13.7
5.75 1.08 1.1 -12.3
6.00 1.09 1.1 -11.0
6.25 1.10 1.2 -9.6
6.50 1.11 1.2 -8.3
6.75 1.12 1.2 -6.9
7.00 1.13 1.2 -5.5
7.25 1.14 1.3 -4.1
7.50 1.15 1.3 -2.8
7.75 1.16 1.3 -1.4
8.00 1.17 1.3 0.0
8.25 1.18 1.4 1.4
8.50 1.19 1.4 2.9
8.75 1.20 1.4 4.3
9.00 1.21 1.4 5.7
9.25 1.22 1.5 7.2
9.50 1.26 1.5 9.2
9.75 1.32 1.6 11.9
10.00 1.38 1.6 14.7
10.25 1.44 1.7 17.5
10.50 1.51 1.8 20.3
10.75 1.58 1.8 23.1
11.00 1.66 1.9 25.9
11.25 1.74 2.0 28.8
11.50 1.82 2.1 31.7
11.75 1.90 2.2 34.7
12.00 2.40 3.1 65.0
12.25 4.08 7.8 151.9
12.50 6.94 19.6 261.2
12.75 11.68 57.8 427.2


Note that you can only know the effective temperature, the actual temperature will depend on the strength of the greenhouse effect, and modeling that is a whole new problem with huge uncertainties.



According to this model, the terminal age main sequence of the Sun would be 9.38 Billion years, and according to the data above, the effective temperature then would be 8.2 °C (281 K), that's 27.2 °C hotter than today.






share|improve this answer











$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    Thank you for the detailed answer. Can you suggest any recent papers which have modeled the actual temperature? or any books which discuss compare various models for actual temperatures.
    $endgroup$
    – sidharth chhabra
    23 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    I'm doubt anyone have dare to model greenhouse effect in multi-billion years timescale. Or at least I'm not aware of such research. I don't know why exactly do you need this number, but I think you are better off, figuring our at what temperature using normal green house effects, a runaway greenhouse effect would be inevitable.
    $endgroup$
    – Camilo Rada
    22 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    Or as a mental exercise, it would be possible to calculate what would be the temperature if we have the same greenhouse effect than today but the solar luminosity of four billion years in the future.
    $endgroup$
    – Camilo Rada
    22 hours ago








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    This article is nice academic.oup.com/astrogeo/article/42/6/6.26/293074
    $endgroup$
    – Camilo Rada
    22 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @undefined 1 Billion = $10^9$=1,000,000,000
    $endgroup$
    – Camilo Rada
    10 hours ago











Your Answer





StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "553"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fearthscience.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f16580%2fwhat-will-be-the-temperature-on-earth-when-sun-finishes-its-main-sequence%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









4












$begingroup$

Answers will be different because they must be tied to a model of solar evolution, and all models are a bit different.



So to answer your question we have to select a model. A pretty standard and trusted one, is the one used in the paper Stellar evolution models for Z = 0.0001 to 0.03. Where Z stands for the metalicity of the star, that for the Sun they indicate would be 0.0188.



In figure 2, they show the trajectory of a star like the sun in the H-R diagram (look for the line labeled "1.0").



enter image description here



The data output of this model is available at the VizieR catalog. I just downloaded the data for starts of one solar mass and Z=0.02 (like the Sun), and computed the effective temperature of Earth using the formula in the linked question



$Large frac{T}{T_0}=left(frac{L}{L_0}right)^{frac{1}{4}}$



Using a current effective temperature $T_0$ of -19°C (you will find values between -18 and -21°C), we get that the plot pf Luminosity and temperature versus time looks like this



enter image description here



And given that you are interested in specific values here is some tabulated data including also the solar radius. Note that most of these points are linear interpolations of the original data, that had only six points in this age range.



Age         Radius      Lumin.  Temperature
[Billion [solar [Solar [°C]
years] radius] Lumin.]
0.00 0.89 0.7 -41.4
0.25 0.90 0.7 -40.2
0.50 0.91 0.7 -39.0
0.75 0.91 0.7 -37.8
1.00 0.92 0.8 -36.6
1.25 0.93 0.8 -35.4
1.50 0.94 0.8 -34.2
1.75 0.95 0.8 -32.9
2.00 0.95 0.8 -31.7
2.25 0.96 0.8 -30.4
2.50 0.97 0.8 -29.2
2.75 0.98 0.9 -27.9
3.00 0.99 0.9 -26.7
3.25 1.00 0.9 -25.4
3.50 1.00 0.9 -24.1
3.75 1.01 0.9 -22.8
4.00 1.02 1.0 -21.5
4.25 1.03 1.0 -20.2
4.50 1.04 1.0 -18.9
4.75 1.05 1.0 -17.6
5.00 1.06 1.0 -16.3
5.25 1.07 1.1 -15.0
5.50 1.08 1.1 -13.7
5.75 1.08 1.1 -12.3
6.00 1.09 1.1 -11.0
6.25 1.10 1.2 -9.6
6.50 1.11 1.2 -8.3
6.75 1.12 1.2 -6.9
7.00 1.13 1.2 -5.5
7.25 1.14 1.3 -4.1
7.50 1.15 1.3 -2.8
7.75 1.16 1.3 -1.4
8.00 1.17 1.3 0.0
8.25 1.18 1.4 1.4
8.50 1.19 1.4 2.9
8.75 1.20 1.4 4.3
9.00 1.21 1.4 5.7
9.25 1.22 1.5 7.2
9.50 1.26 1.5 9.2
9.75 1.32 1.6 11.9
10.00 1.38 1.6 14.7
10.25 1.44 1.7 17.5
10.50 1.51 1.8 20.3
10.75 1.58 1.8 23.1
11.00 1.66 1.9 25.9
11.25 1.74 2.0 28.8
11.50 1.82 2.1 31.7
11.75 1.90 2.2 34.7
12.00 2.40 3.1 65.0
12.25 4.08 7.8 151.9
12.50 6.94 19.6 261.2
12.75 11.68 57.8 427.2


Note that you can only know the effective temperature, the actual temperature will depend on the strength of the greenhouse effect, and modeling that is a whole new problem with huge uncertainties.



According to this model, the terminal age main sequence of the Sun would be 9.38 Billion years, and according to the data above, the effective temperature then would be 8.2 °C (281 K), that's 27.2 °C hotter than today.






share|improve this answer











$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    Thank you for the detailed answer. Can you suggest any recent papers which have modeled the actual temperature? or any books which discuss compare various models for actual temperatures.
    $endgroup$
    – sidharth chhabra
    23 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    I'm doubt anyone have dare to model greenhouse effect in multi-billion years timescale. Or at least I'm not aware of such research. I don't know why exactly do you need this number, but I think you are better off, figuring our at what temperature using normal green house effects, a runaway greenhouse effect would be inevitable.
    $endgroup$
    – Camilo Rada
    22 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    Or as a mental exercise, it would be possible to calculate what would be the temperature if we have the same greenhouse effect than today but the solar luminosity of four billion years in the future.
    $endgroup$
    – Camilo Rada
    22 hours ago








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    This article is nice academic.oup.com/astrogeo/article/42/6/6.26/293074
    $endgroup$
    – Camilo Rada
    22 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @undefined 1 Billion = $10^9$=1,000,000,000
    $endgroup$
    – Camilo Rada
    10 hours ago
















4












$begingroup$

Answers will be different because they must be tied to a model of solar evolution, and all models are a bit different.



So to answer your question we have to select a model. A pretty standard and trusted one, is the one used in the paper Stellar evolution models for Z = 0.0001 to 0.03. Where Z stands for the metalicity of the star, that for the Sun they indicate would be 0.0188.



In figure 2, they show the trajectory of a star like the sun in the H-R diagram (look for the line labeled "1.0").



enter image description here



The data output of this model is available at the VizieR catalog. I just downloaded the data for starts of one solar mass and Z=0.02 (like the Sun), and computed the effective temperature of Earth using the formula in the linked question



$Large frac{T}{T_0}=left(frac{L}{L_0}right)^{frac{1}{4}}$



Using a current effective temperature $T_0$ of -19°C (you will find values between -18 and -21°C), we get that the plot pf Luminosity and temperature versus time looks like this



enter image description here



And given that you are interested in specific values here is some tabulated data including also the solar radius. Note that most of these points are linear interpolations of the original data, that had only six points in this age range.



Age         Radius      Lumin.  Temperature
[Billion [solar [Solar [°C]
years] radius] Lumin.]
0.00 0.89 0.7 -41.4
0.25 0.90 0.7 -40.2
0.50 0.91 0.7 -39.0
0.75 0.91 0.7 -37.8
1.00 0.92 0.8 -36.6
1.25 0.93 0.8 -35.4
1.50 0.94 0.8 -34.2
1.75 0.95 0.8 -32.9
2.00 0.95 0.8 -31.7
2.25 0.96 0.8 -30.4
2.50 0.97 0.8 -29.2
2.75 0.98 0.9 -27.9
3.00 0.99 0.9 -26.7
3.25 1.00 0.9 -25.4
3.50 1.00 0.9 -24.1
3.75 1.01 0.9 -22.8
4.00 1.02 1.0 -21.5
4.25 1.03 1.0 -20.2
4.50 1.04 1.0 -18.9
4.75 1.05 1.0 -17.6
5.00 1.06 1.0 -16.3
5.25 1.07 1.1 -15.0
5.50 1.08 1.1 -13.7
5.75 1.08 1.1 -12.3
6.00 1.09 1.1 -11.0
6.25 1.10 1.2 -9.6
6.50 1.11 1.2 -8.3
6.75 1.12 1.2 -6.9
7.00 1.13 1.2 -5.5
7.25 1.14 1.3 -4.1
7.50 1.15 1.3 -2.8
7.75 1.16 1.3 -1.4
8.00 1.17 1.3 0.0
8.25 1.18 1.4 1.4
8.50 1.19 1.4 2.9
8.75 1.20 1.4 4.3
9.00 1.21 1.4 5.7
9.25 1.22 1.5 7.2
9.50 1.26 1.5 9.2
9.75 1.32 1.6 11.9
10.00 1.38 1.6 14.7
10.25 1.44 1.7 17.5
10.50 1.51 1.8 20.3
10.75 1.58 1.8 23.1
11.00 1.66 1.9 25.9
11.25 1.74 2.0 28.8
11.50 1.82 2.1 31.7
11.75 1.90 2.2 34.7
12.00 2.40 3.1 65.0
12.25 4.08 7.8 151.9
12.50 6.94 19.6 261.2
12.75 11.68 57.8 427.2


Note that you can only know the effective temperature, the actual temperature will depend on the strength of the greenhouse effect, and modeling that is a whole new problem with huge uncertainties.



According to this model, the terminal age main sequence of the Sun would be 9.38 Billion years, and according to the data above, the effective temperature then would be 8.2 °C (281 K), that's 27.2 °C hotter than today.






share|improve this answer











$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    Thank you for the detailed answer. Can you suggest any recent papers which have modeled the actual temperature? or any books which discuss compare various models for actual temperatures.
    $endgroup$
    – sidharth chhabra
    23 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    I'm doubt anyone have dare to model greenhouse effect in multi-billion years timescale. Or at least I'm not aware of such research. I don't know why exactly do you need this number, but I think you are better off, figuring our at what temperature using normal green house effects, a runaway greenhouse effect would be inevitable.
    $endgroup$
    – Camilo Rada
    22 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    Or as a mental exercise, it would be possible to calculate what would be the temperature if we have the same greenhouse effect than today but the solar luminosity of four billion years in the future.
    $endgroup$
    – Camilo Rada
    22 hours ago








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    This article is nice academic.oup.com/astrogeo/article/42/6/6.26/293074
    $endgroup$
    – Camilo Rada
    22 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @undefined 1 Billion = $10^9$=1,000,000,000
    $endgroup$
    – Camilo Rada
    10 hours ago














4












4








4





$begingroup$

Answers will be different because they must be tied to a model of solar evolution, and all models are a bit different.



So to answer your question we have to select a model. A pretty standard and trusted one, is the one used in the paper Stellar evolution models for Z = 0.0001 to 0.03. Where Z stands for the metalicity of the star, that for the Sun they indicate would be 0.0188.



In figure 2, they show the trajectory of a star like the sun in the H-R diagram (look for the line labeled "1.0").



enter image description here



The data output of this model is available at the VizieR catalog. I just downloaded the data for starts of one solar mass and Z=0.02 (like the Sun), and computed the effective temperature of Earth using the formula in the linked question



$Large frac{T}{T_0}=left(frac{L}{L_0}right)^{frac{1}{4}}$



Using a current effective temperature $T_0$ of -19°C (you will find values between -18 and -21°C), we get that the plot pf Luminosity and temperature versus time looks like this



enter image description here



And given that you are interested in specific values here is some tabulated data including also the solar radius. Note that most of these points are linear interpolations of the original data, that had only six points in this age range.



Age         Radius      Lumin.  Temperature
[Billion [solar [Solar [°C]
years] radius] Lumin.]
0.00 0.89 0.7 -41.4
0.25 0.90 0.7 -40.2
0.50 0.91 0.7 -39.0
0.75 0.91 0.7 -37.8
1.00 0.92 0.8 -36.6
1.25 0.93 0.8 -35.4
1.50 0.94 0.8 -34.2
1.75 0.95 0.8 -32.9
2.00 0.95 0.8 -31.7
2.25 0.96 0.8 -30.4
2.50 0.97 0.8 -29.2
2.75 0.98 0.9 -27.9
3.00 0.99 0.9 -26.7
3.25 1.00 0.9 -25.4
3.50 1.00 0.9 -24.1
3.75 1.01 0.9 -22.8
4.00 1.02 1.0 -21.5
4.25 1.03 1.0 -20.2
4.50 1.04 1.0 -18.9
4.75 1.05 1.0 -17.6
5.00 1.06 1.0 -16.3
5.25 1.07 1.1 -15.0
5.50 1.08 1.1 -13.7
5.75 1.08 1.1 -12.3
6.00 1.09 1.1 -11.0
6.25 1.10 1.2 -9.6
6.50 1.11 1.2 -8.3
6.75 1.12 1.2 -6.9
7.00 1.13 1.2 -5.5
7.25 1.14 1.3 -4.1
7.50 1.15 1.3 -2.8
7.75 1.16 1.3 -1.4
8.00 1.17 1.3 0.0
8.25 1.18 1.4 1.4
8.50 1.19 1.4 2.9
8.75 1.20 1.4 4.3
9.00 1.21 1.4 5.7
9.25 1.22 1.5 7.2
9.50 1.26 1.5 9.2
9.75 1.32 1.6 11.9
10.00 1.38 1.6 14.7
10.25 1.44 1.7 17.5
10.50 1.51 1.8 20.3
10.75 1.58 1.8 23.1
11.00 1.66 1.9 25.9
11.25 1.74 2.0 28.8
11.50 1.82 2.1 31.7
11.75 1.90 2.2 34.7
12.00 2.40 3.1 65.0
12.25 4.08 7.8 151.9
12.50 6.94 19.6 261.2
12.75 11.68 57.8 427.2


Note that you can only know the effective temperature, the actual temperature will depend on the strength of the greenhouse effect, and modeling that is a whole new problem with huge uncertainties.



According to this model, the terminal age main sequence of the Sun would be 9.38 Billion years, and according to the data above, the effective temperature then would be 8.2 °C (281 K), that's 27.2 °C hotter than today.






share|improve this answer











$endgroup$



Answers will be different because they must be tied to a model of solar evolution, and all models are a bit different.



So to answer your question we have to select a model. A pretty standard and trusted one, is the one used in the paper Stellar evolution models for Z = 0.0001 to 0.03. Where Z stands for the metalicity of the star, that for the Sun they indicate would be 0.0188.



In figure 2, they show the trajectory of a star like the sun in the H-R diagram (look for the line labeled "1.0").



enter image description here



The data output of this model is available at the VizieR catalog. I just downloaded the data for starts of one solar mass and Z=0.02 (like the Sun), and computed the effective temperature of Earth using the formula in the linked question



$Large frac{T}{T_0}=left(frac{L}{L_0}right)^{frac{1}{4}}$



Using a current effective temperature $T_0$ of -19°C (you will find values between -18 and -21°C), we get that the plot pf Luminosity and temperature versus time looks like this



enter image description here



And given that you are interested in specific values here is some tabulated data including also the solar radius. Note that most of these points are linear interpolations of the original data, that had only six points in this age range.



Age         Radius      Lumin.  Temperature
[Billion [solar [Solar [°C]
years] radius] Lumin.]
0.00 0.89 0.7 -41.4
0.25 0.90 0.7 -40.2
0.50 0.91 0.7 -39.0
0.75 0.91 0.7 -37.8
1.00 0.92 0.8 -36.6
1.25 0.93 0.8 -35.4
1.50 0.94 0.8 -34.2
1.75 0.95 0.8 -32.9
2.00 0.95 0.8 -31.7
2.25 0.96 0.8 -30.4
2.50 0.97 0.8 -29.2
2.75 0.98 0.9 -27.9
3.00 0.99 0.9 -26.7
3.25 1.00 0.9 -25.4
3.50 1.00 0.9 -24.1
3.75 1.01 0.9 -22.8
4.00 1.02 1.0 -21.5
4.25 1.03 1.0 -20.2
4.50 1.04 1.0 -18.9
4.75 1.05 1.0 -17.6
5.00 1.06 1.0 -16.3
5.25 1.07 1.1 -15.0
5.50 1.08 1.1 -13.7
5.75 1.08 1.1 -12.3
6.00 1.09 1.1 -11.0
6.25 1.10 1.2 -9.6
6.50 1.11 1.2 -8.3
6.75 1.12 1.2 -6.9
7.00 1.13 1.2 -5.5
7.25 1.14 1.3 -4.1
7.50 1.15 1.3 -2.8
7.75 1.16 1.3 -1.4
8.00 1.17 1.3 0.0
8.25 1.18 1.4 1.4
8.50 1.19 1.4 2.9
8.75 1.20 1.4 4.3
9.00 1.21 1.4 5.7
9.25 1.22 1.5 7.2
9.50 1.26 1.5 9.2
9.75 1.32 1.6 11.9
10.00 1.38 1.6 14.7
10.25 1.44 1.7 17.5
10.50 1.51 1.8 20.3
10.75 1.58 1.8 23.1
11.00 1.66 1.9 25.9
11.25 1.74 2.0 28.8
11.50 1.82 2.1 31.7
11.75 1.90 2.2 34.7
12.00 2.40 3.1 65.0
12.25 4.08 7.8 151.9
12.50 6.94 19.6 261.2
12.75 11.68 57.8 427.2


Note that you can only know the effective temperature, the actual temperature will depend on the strength of the greenhouse effect, and modeling that is a whole new problem with huge uncertainties.



According to this model, the terminal age main sequence of the Sun would be 9.38 Billion years, and according to the data above, the effective temperature then would be 8.2 °C (281 K), that's 27.2 °C hotter than today.







share|improve this answer














share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer








edited 22 hours ago

























answered 23 hours ago









Camilo RadaCamilo Rada

13.5k54396




13.5k54396












  • $begingroup$
    Thank you for the detailed answer. Can you suggest any recent papers which have modeled the actual temperature? or any books which discuss compare various models for actual temperatures.
    $endgroup$
    – sidharth chhabra
    23 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    I'm doubt anyone have dare to model greenhouse effect in multi-billion years timescale. Or at least I'm not aware of such research. I don't know why exactly do you need this number, but I think you are better off, figuring our at what temperature using normal green house effects, a runaway greenhouse effect would be inevitable.
    $endgroup$
    – Camilo Rada
    22 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    Or as a mental exercise, it would be possible to calculate what would be the temperature if we have the same greenhouse effect than today but the solar luminosity of four billion years in the future.
    $endgroup$
    – Camilo Rada
    22 hours ago








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    This article is nice academic.oup.com/astrogeo/article/42/6/6.26/293074
    $endgroup$
    – Camilo Rada
    22 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @undefined 1 Billion = $10^9$=1,000,000,000
    $endgroup$
    – Camilo Rada
    10 hours ago


















  • $begingroup$
    Thank you for the detailed answer. Can you suggest any recent papers which have modeled the actual temperature? or any books which discuss compare various models for actual temperatures.
    $endgroup$
    – sidharth chhabra
    23 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    I'm doubt anyone have dare to model greenhouse effect in multi-billion years timescale. Or at least I'm not aware of such research. I don't know why exactly do you need this number, but I think you are better off, figuring our at what temperature using normal green house effects, a runaway greenhouse effect would be inevitable.
    $endgroup$
    – Camilo Rada
    22 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    Or as a mental exercise, it would be possible to calculate what would be the temperature if we have the same greenhouse effect than today but the solar luminosity of four billion years in the future.
    $endgroup$
    – Camilo Rada
    22 hours ago








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    This article is nice academic.oup.com/astrogeo/article/42/6/6.26/293074
    $endgroup$
    – Camilo Rada
    22 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @undefined 1 Billion = $10^9$=1,000,000,000
    $endgroup$
    – Camilo Rada
    10 hours ago
















$begingroup$
Thank you for the detailed answer. Can you suggest any recent papers which have modeled the actual temperature? or any books which discuss compare various models for actual temperatures.
$endgroup$
– sidharth chhabra
23 hours ago




$begingroup$
Thank you for the detailed answer. Can you suggest any recent papers which have modeled the actual temperature? or any books which discuss compare various models for actual temperatures.
$endgroup$
– sidharth chhabra
23 hours ago












$begingroup$
I'm doubt anyone have dare to model greenhouse effect in multi-billion years timescale. Or at least I'm not aware of such research. I don't know why exactly do you need this number, but I think you are better off, figuring our at what temperature using normal green house effects, a runaway greenhouse effect would be inevitable.
$endgroup$
– Camilo Rada
22 hours ago




$begingroup$
I'm doubt anyone have dare to model greenhouse effect in multi-billion years timescale. Or at least I'm not aware of such research. I don't know why exactly do you need this number, but I think you are better off, figuring our at what temperature using normal green house effects, a runaway greenhouse effect would be inevitable.
$endgroup$
– Camilo Rada
22 hours ago












$begingroup$
Or as a mental exercise, it would be possible to calculate what would be the temperature if we have the same greenhouse effect than today but the solar luminosity of four billion years in the future.
$endgroup$
– Camilo Rada
22 hours ago






$begingroup$
Or as a mental exercise, it would be possible to calculate what would be the temperature if we have the same greenhouse effect than today but the solar luminosity of four billion years in the future.
$endgroup$
– Camilo Rada
22 hours ago






1




1




$begingroup$
This article is nice academic.oup.com/astrogeo/article/42/6/6.26/293074
$endgroup$
– Camilo Rada
22 hours ago




$begingroup$
This article is nice academic.oup.com/astrogeo/article/42/6/6.26/293074
$endgroup$
– Camilo Rada
22 hours ago




1




1




$begingroup$
@undefined 1 Billion = $10^9$=1,000,000,000
$endgroup$
– Camilo Rada
10 hours ago




$begingroup$
@undefined 1 Billion = $10^9$=1,000,000,000
$endgroup$
– Camilo Rada
10 hours ago


















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Earth Science Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fearthscience.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f16580%2fwhat-will-be-the-temperature-on-earth-when-sun-finishes-its-main-sequence%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Færeyskur hestur Heimild | Tengill | Tilvísanir | LeiðsagnarvalRossið - síða um færeyska hrossið á færeyskuGott ár hjá færeyska hestinum

He _____ here since 1970 . Answer needed [closed]What does “since he was so high” mean?Meaning of “catch birds for”?How do I ensure “since” takes the meaning I want?“Who cares here” meaningWhat does “right round toward” mean?the time tense (had now been detected)What does the phrase “ring around the roses” mean here?Correct usage of “visited upon”Meaning of “foiled rail sabotage bid”It was the third time I had gone to Rome or It is the third time I had been to Rome

Slayer Innehåll Historia | Stil, komposition och lyrik | Bandets betydelse och framgångar | Sidoprojekt och samarbeten | Kontroverser | Medlemmar | Utmärkelser och nomineringar | Turnéer och festivaler | Diskografi | Referenser | Externa länkar | Navigeringsmenywww.slayer.net”Metal Massacre vol. 1””Metal Massacre vol. 3””Metal Massacre Volume III””Show No Mercy””Haunting the Chapel””Live Undead””Hell Awaits””Reign in Blood””Reign in Blood””Gold & Platinum – Reign in Blood””Golden Gods Awards Winners”originalet”Kerrang! Hall Of Fame””Slayer Looks Back On 37-Year Career In New Video Series: Part Two””South of Heaven””Gold & Platinum – South of Heaven””Seasons in the Abyss””Gold & Platinum - Seasons in the Abyss””Divine Intervention””Divine Intervention - Release group by Slayer””Gold & Platinum - Divine Intervention””Live Intrusion””Undisputed Attitude””Abolish Government/Superficial Love””Release “Slatanic Slaughter: A Tribute to Slayer” by Various Artists””Diabolus in Musica””Soundtrack to the Apocalypse””God Hates Us All””Systematic - Relationships””War at the Warfield””Gold & Platinum - War at the Warfield””Soundtrack to the Apocalypse””Gold & Platinum - Still Reigning””Metallica, Slayer, Iron Mauden Among Winners At Metal Hammer Awards””Eternal Pyre””Eternal Pyre - Slayer release group””Eternal Pyre””Metal Storm Awards 2006””Kerrang! Hall Of Fame””Slayer Wins 'Best Metal' Grammy Award””Slayer Guitarist Jeff Hanneman Dies””Bullet-For My Valentine booed at Metal Hammer Golden Gods Awards””Unholy Aliance””The End Of Slayer?””Slayer: We Could Thrash Out Two More Albums If We're Fast Enough...””'The Unholy Alliance: Chapter III' UK Dates Added”originalet”Megadeth And Slayer To Co-Headline 'Canadian Carnage' Trek”originalet”World Painted Blood””Release “World Painted Blood” by Slayer””Metallica Heading To Cinemas””Slayer, Megadeth To Join Forces For 'European Carnage' Tour - Dec. 18, 2010”originalet”Slayer's Hanneman Contracts Acute Infection; Band To Bring In Guest Guitarist””Cannibal Corpse's Pat O'Brien Will Step In As Slayer's Guest Guitarist”originalet”Slayer’s Jeff Hanneman Dead at 49””Dave Lombardo Says He Made Only $67,000 In 2011 While Touring With Slayer””Slayer: We Do Not Agree With Dave Lombardo's Substance Or Timeline Of Events””Slayer Welcomes Drummer Paul Bostaph Back To The Fold””Slayer Hope to Unveil Never-Before-Heard Jeff Hanneman Material on Next Album””Slayer Debut New Song 'Implode' During Surprise Golden Gods Appearance””Release group Repentless by Slayer””Repentless - Slayer - Credits””Slayer””Metal Storm Awards 2015””Slayer - to release comic book "Repentless #1"””Slayer To Release 'Repentless' 6.66" Vinyl Box Set””BREAKING NEWS: Slayer Announce Farewell Tour””Slayer Recruit Lamb of God, Anthrax, Behemoth + Testament for Final Tour””Slayer lägger ner efter 37 år””Slayer Announces Second North American Leg Of 'Final' Tour””Final World Tour””Slayer Announces Final European Tour With Lamb of God, Anthrax And Obituary””Slayer To Tour Europe With Lamb of God, Anthrax And Obituary””Slayer To Play 'Last French Show Ever' At Next Year's Hellfst””Slayer's Final World Tour Will Extend Into 2019””Death Angel's Rob Cavestany On Slayer's 'Farewell' Tour: 'Some Of Us Could See This Coming'””Testament Has No Plans To Retire Anytime Soon, Says Chuck Billy””Anthrax's Scott Ian On Slayer's 'Farewell' Tour Plans: 'I Was Surprised And I Wasn't Surprised'””Slayer””Slayer's Morbid Schlock””Review/Rock; For Slayer, the Mania Is the Message””Slayer - Biography””Slayer - Reign In Blood”originalet”Dave Lombardo””An exclusive oral history of Slayer”originalet”Exclusive! Interview With Slayer Guitarist Jeff Hanneman”originalet”Thinking Out Loud: Slayer's Kerry King on hair metal, Satan and being polite””Slayer Lyrics””Slayer - Biography””Most influential artists for extreme metal music””Slayer - Reign in Blood””Slayer guitarist Jeff Hanneman dies aged 49””Slatanic Slaughter: A Tribute to Slayer””Gateway to Hell: A Tribute to Slayer””Covered In Blood””Slayer: The Origins of Thrash in San Francisco, CA.””Why They Rule - #6 Slayer”originalet”Guitar World's 100 Greatest Heavy Metal Guitarists Of All Time”originalet”The fans have spoken: Slayer comes out on top in readers' polls”originalet”Tribute to Jeff Hanneman (1964-2013)””Lamb Of God Frontman: We Sound Like A Slayer Rip-Off””BEHEMOTH Frontman Pays Tribute To SLAYER's JEFF HANNEMAN””Slayer, Hatebreed Doing Double Duty On This Year's Ozzfest””System of a Down””Lacuna Coil’s Andrea Ferro Talks Influences, Skateboarding, Band Origins + More””Slayer - Reign in Blood””Into The Lungs of Hell””Slayer rules - en utställning om fans””Slayer and Their Fans Slashed Through a No-Holds-Barred Night at Gas Monkey””Home””Slayer””Gold & Platinum - The Big 4 Live from Sofia, Bulgaria””Exclusive! Interview With Slayer Guitarist Kerry King””2008-02-23: Wiltern, Los Angeles, CA, USA””Slayer's Kerry King To Perform With Megadeth Tonight! - Oct. 21, 2010”originalet”Dave Lombardo - Biography”Slayer Case DismissedArkiveradUltimate Classic Rock: Slayer guitarist Jeff Hanneman dead at 49.”Slayer: "We could never do any thing like Some Kind Of Monster..."””Cannibal Corpse'S Pat O'Brien Will Step In As Slayer'S Guest Guitarist | The Official Slayer Site”originalet”Slayer Wins 'Best Metal' Grammy Award””Slayer Guitarist Jeff Hanneman Dies””Kerrang! Awards 2006 Blog: Kerrang! Hall Of Fame””Kerrang! Awards 2013: Kerrang! Legend”originalet”Metallica, Slayer, Iron Maien Among Winners At Metal Hammer Awards””Metal Hammer Golden Gods Awards””Bullet For My Valentine Booed At Metal Hammer Golden Gods Awards””Metal Storm Awards 2006””Metal Storm Awards 2015””Slayer's Concert History””Slayer - Relationships””Slayer - Releases”Slayers officiella webbplatsSlayer på MusicBrainzOfficiell webbplatsSlayerSlayerr1373445760000 0001 1540 47353068615-5086262726cb13906545x(data)6033143kn20030215029