Alternative way to say “there are a number of limitations to our analysis” [closed]





.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty{
margin-bottom:0;
}








1

















I am looking for an appropriate way to say "there are a number of limitations to our analysis", which does not sound so demeaning to the work we have carried out.



I am new to this site so apologies if I haven't gone about this the correct way.










share|improve this question
















closed as primarily opinion-based by jimm101, FumbleFingers, Edwin Ashworth, JJJ, Chappo May 29 at 15:35


Many good questions generate some degree of opinion based on expert experience, but answers to this question will tend to be almost entirely based on opinions, rather than facts, references, or specific expertise. If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.















  • 2





    Where will be this published and what exactly do you mean by demeaning? What do you try to avoid? "Limitation" is very commonly used when describing studies. "Within the limitation of this systematic review, there is insufficient evidence.." ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27377109

    – Jan
    May 28 at 16:17













  • Thanks @Jan. This isn't being published but is going to a client of ours. To be honest I am happy with the term limitations, it is more the "there are a number of", which to my ears sounds quite bad.

    – AWGIS
    May 28 at 16:25






  • 1





    Words like inevitably can convey that the limitations are due to the nature of the exercise and not the way you have gone about it.

    – user339660
    May 28 at 16:26











  • @Minty that is a really good point and exactly the kind of sentence I was trying to convey.

    – AWGIS
    May 28 at 16:28






  • 2





    I don't think limitations has significant "belittling, derogatory" implications in your context (it's certainly less so than, say, deficiencies). But you might consider using caveats instead.

    – FumbleFingers
    May 28 at 16:29


















1

















I am looking for an appropriate way to say "there are a number of limitations to our analysis", which does not sound so demeaning to the work we have carried out.



I am new to this site so apologies if I haven't gone about this the correct way.










share|improve this question
















closed as primarily opinion-based by jimm101, FumbleFingers, Edwin Ashworth, JJJ, Chappo May 29 at 15:35


Many good questions generate some degree of opinion based on expert experience, but answers to this question will tend to be almost entirely based on opinions, rather than facts, references, or specific expertise. If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.















  • 2





    Where will be this published and what exactly do you mean by demeaning? What do you try to avoid? "Limitation" is very commonly used when describing studies. "Within the limitation of this systematic review, there is insufficient evidence.." ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27377109

    – Jan
    May 28 at 16:17













  • Thanks @Jan. This isn't being published but is going to a client of ours. To be honest I am happy with the term limitations, it is more the "there are a number of", which to my ears sounds quite bad.

    – AWGIS
    May 28 at 16:25






  • 1





    Words like inevitably can convey that the limitations are due to the nature of the exercise and not the way you have gone about it.

    – user339660
    May 28 at 16:26











  • @Minty that is a really good point and exactly the kind of sentence I was trying to convey.

    – AWGIS
    May 28 at 16:28






  • 2





    I don't think limitations has significant "belittling, derogatory" implications in your context (it's certainly less so than, say, deficiencies). But you might consider using caveats instead.

    – FumbleFingers
    May 28 at 16:29














1












1








1








I am looking for an appropriate way to say "there are a number of limitations to our analysis", which does not sound so demeaning to the work we have carried out.



I am new to this site so apologies if I haven't gone about this the correct way.










share|improve this question














I am looking for an appropriate way to say "there are a number of limitations to our analysis", which does not sound so demeaning to the work we have carried out.



I am new to this site so apologies if I haven't gone about this the correct way.







word-usage synonyms






share|improve this question













share|improve this question











share|improve this question




share|improve this question



share|improve this question










asked May 28 at 16:13









AWGISAWGIS

1062 bronze badges




1062 bronze badges





closed as primarily opinion-based by jimm101, FumbleFingers, Edwin Ashworth, JJJ, Chappo May 29 at 15:35


Many good questions generate some degree of opinion based on expert experience, but answers to this question will tend to be almost entirely based on opinions, rather than facts, references, or specific expertise. If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.











closed as primarily opinion-based by jimm101, FumbleFingers, Edwin Ashworth, JJJ, Chappo May 29 at 15:35


Many good questions generate some degree of opinion based on expert experience, but answers to this question will tend to be almost entirely based on opinions, rather than facts, references, or specific expertise. If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.









closed as primarily opinion-based by jimm101, FumbleFingers, Edwin Ashworth, JJJ, Chappo May 29 at 15:35


Many good questions generate some degree of opinion based on expert experience, but answers to this question will tend to be almost entirely based on opinions, rather than facts, references, or specific expertise. If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.










  • 2





    Where will be this published and what exactly do you mean by demeaning? What do you try to avoid? "Limitation" is very commonly used when describing studies. "Within the limitation of this systematic review, there is insufficient evidence.." ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27377109

    – Jan
    May 28 at 16:17













  • Thanks @Jan. This isn't being published but is going to a client of ours. To be honest I am happy with the term limitations, it is more the "there are a number of", which to my ears sounds quite bad.

    – AWGIS
    May 28 at 16:25






  • 1





    Words like inevitably can convey that the limitations are due to the nature of the exercise and not the way you have gone about it.

    – user339660
    May 28 at 16:26











  • @Minty that is a really good point and exactly the kind of sentence I was trying to convey.

    – AWGIS
    May 28 at 16:28






  • 2





    I don't think limitations has significant "belittling, derogatory" implications in your context (it's certainly less so than, say, deficiencies). But you might consider using caveats instead.

    – FumbleFingers
    May 28 at 16:29














  • 2





    Where will be this published and what exactly do you mean by demeaning? What do you try to avoid? "Limitation" is very commonly used when describing studies. "Within the limitation of this systematic review, there is insufficient evidence.." ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27377109

    – Jan
    May 28 at 16:17













  • Thanks @Jan. This isn't being published but is going to a client of ours. To be honest I am happy with the term limitations, it is more the "there are a number of", which to my ears sounds quite bad.

    – AWGIS
    May 28 at 16:25






  • 1





    Words like inevitably can convey that the limitations are due to the nature of the exercise and not the way you have gone about it.

    – user339660
    May 28 at 16:26











  • @Minty that is a really good point and exactly the kind of sentence I was trying to convey.

    – AWGIS
    May 28 at 16:28






  • 2





    I don't think limitations has significant "belittling, derogatory" implications in your context (it's certainly less so than, say, deficiencies). But you might consider using caveats instead.

    – FumbleFingers
    May 28 at 16:29








2




2





Where will be this published and what exactly do you mean by demeaning? What do you try to avoid? "Limitation" is very commonly used when describing studies. "Within the limitation of this systematic review, there is insufficient evidence.." ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27377109

– Jan
May 28 at 16:17







Where will be this published and what exactly do you mean by demeaning? What do you try to avoid? "Limitation" is very commonly used when describing studies. "Within the limitation of this systematic review, there is insufficient evidence.." ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27377109

– Jan
May 28 at 16:17















Thanks @Jan. This isn't being published but is going to a client of ours. To be honest I am happy with the term limitations, it is more the "there are a number of", which to my ears sounds quite bad.

– AWGIS
May 28 at 16:25





Thanks @Jan. This isn't being published but is going to a client of ours. To be honest I am happy with the term limitations, it is more the "there are a number of", which to my ears sounds quite bad.

– AWGIS
May 28 at 16:25




1




1





Words like inevitably can convey that the limitations are due to the nature of the exercise and not the way you have gone about it.

– user339660
May 28 at 16:26





Words like inevitably can convey that the limitations are due to the nature of the exercise and not the way you have gone about it.

– user339660
May 28 at 16:26













@Minty that is a really good point and exactly the kind of sentence I was trying to convey.

– AWGIS
May 28 at 16:28





@Minty that is a really good point and exactly the kind of sentence I was trying to convey.

– AWGIS
May 28 at 16:28




2




2





I don't think limitations has significant "belittling, derogatory" implications in your context (it's certainly less so than, say, deficiencies). But you might consider using caveats instead.

– FumbleFingers
May 28 at 16:29





I don't think limitations has significant "belittling, derogatory" implications in your context (it's certainly less so than, say, deficiencies). But you might consider using caveats instead.

– FumbleFingers
May 28 at 16:29










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















4


















The sentence is fine as it stands. You could say There are limitations to our analysis leaving out the Number of description. It would mean much the same.



Telling the audience that you know of the limitations will be taken as you're being serious about the analysis, not demeaning. You would need to follow this by listing or enumerating the limitations.






share|improve this answer


































    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes








    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    4


















    The sentence is fine as it stands. You could say There are limitations to our analysis leaving out the Number of description. It would mean much the same.



    Telling the audience that you know of the limitations will be taken as you're being serious about the analysis, not demeaning. You would need to follow this by listing or enumerating the limitations.






    share|improve this answer































      4


















      The sentence is fine as it stands. You could say There are limitations to our analysis leaving out the Number of description. It would mean much the same.



      Telling the audience that you know of the limitations will be taken as you're being serious about the analysis, not demeaning. You would need to follow this by listing or enumerating the limitations.






      share|improve this answer





























        4














        4










        4









        The sentence is fine as it stands. You could say There are limitations to our analysis leaving out the Number of description. It would mean much the same.



        Telling the audience that you know of the limitations will be taken as you're being serious about the analysis, not demeaning. You would need to follow this by listing or enumerating the limitations.






        share|improve this answer














        The sentence is fine as it stands. You could say There are limitations to our analysis leaving out the Number of description. It would mean much the same.



        Telling the audience that you know of the limitations will be taken as you're being serious about the analysis, not demeaning. You would need to follow this by listing or enumerating the limitations.







        share|improve this answer













        share|improve this answer




        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer










        answered May 28 at 18:16









        ElliotElliot

        1091 bronze badge




        1091 bronze badge


















            Popular posts from this blog

            He _____ here since 1970 . Answer needed [closed]What does “since he was so high” mean?Meaning of “catch birds for”?How do I ensure “since” takes the meaning I want?“Who cares here” meaningWhat does “right round toward” mean?the time tense (had now been detected)What does the phrase “ring around the roses” mean here?Correct usage of “visited upon”Meaning of “foiled rail sabotage bid”It was the third time I had gone to Rome or It is the third time I had been to Rome

            Bunad

            Færeyskur hestur Heimild | Tengill | Tilvísanir | LeiðsagnarvalRossið - síða um færeyska hrossið á færeyskuGott ár hjá færeyska hestinum