Star/Wye electrical connection math symbol
I am writing lots of mathematics within electrical engineering, where I often need to specify which of two connection types I am talking about.
One is called Delta, specified with a triangle $Delta$
. The other is called Wye/Star, a three legged star with $120degree$
separated legs, like in the picture below.
What I wish for is a way to inline with the mathematics write $wye$
and get the depicted symbol the same way I get $Delta$
, but I am not very experienced with defining new symbols...
macros amsmath
add a comment |
I am writing lots of mathematics within electrical engineering, where I often need to specify which of two connection types I am talking about.
One is called Delta, specified with a triangle $Delta$
. The other is called Wye/Star, a three legged star with $120degree$
separated legs, like in the picture below.
What I wish for is a way to inline with the mathematics write $wye$
and get the depicted symbol the same way I get $Delta$
, but I am not very experienced with defining new symbols...
macros amsmath
add a comment |
I am writing lots of mathematics within electrical engineering, where I often need to specify which of two connection types I am talking about.
One is called Delta, specified with a triangle $Delta$
. The other is called Wye/Star, a three legged star with $120degree$
separated legs, like in the picture below.
What I wish for is a way to inline with the mathematics write $wye$
and get the depicted symbol the same way I get $Delta$
, but I am not very experienced with defining new symbols...
macros amsmath
I am writing lots of mathematics within electrical engineering, where I often need to specify which of two connection types I am talking about.
One is called Delta, specified with a triangle $Delta$
. The other is called Wye/Star, a three legged star with $120degree$
separated legs, like in the picture below.
What I wish for is a way to inline with the mathematics write $wye$
and get the depicted symbol the same way I get $Delta$
, but I am not very experienced with defining new symbols...
macros amsmath
macros amsmath
edited 15 hours ago
E. l4d3
asked 15 hours ago
E. l4d3E. l4d3
1908
1908
add a comment |
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
I made one leg a bit thicker, in the manner of Delta
.
Works across math styles.
documentclass{article}
usepackage{rotating,stackengine,scalerel}
newcommandwye{scalerel*{stackengine{-1pt}{%
rotatebox[origin=c]{30}{rule{10pt}{.9pt}}kern-1pt%
rotatebox[origin=c]{-30}{rule{10pt}{1.3pt}}}{%
rule{.9pt}{10pt}}{O}{c}{F}{F}{S}}{Delta}}
begin{document}
$Deltawye
scriptstyleDeltawye
scriptscriptstyleDeltawye$
end{document}
Merely changing the instances of {30}
and {-30}
to {40}
and {-40}
will change the aspect, while scalerel
will take care of the scaling automatically:
add a comment |
TikZ? (Scalable line width added, great thanks to marmot!)
documentclass{article}
usepackage{tikz}
usepackage{amssymb}
newcommand{wye}{mathbin{tikz[x=1ex,y=1ex]{draw[line width=.1ex] (0,0)--(45:1)--++(-45:1) (45:1)--++(0,1);}}}
begin{document}
$1wye2$ {Huge $1wye2$}
end{document}
documentclass{article}
usepackage{tikz}
usepackage{amssymb}
newcommand{wye}{mathbin{tikz[x=1ex,y=1ex]{draw[line width=.1ex] (0,0)--(30:1)--++(-30:1) (30:1)--++(0,1);}}}
begin{document}
$1wye2$ {Huge $1wye2$}
end{document}
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "85"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f481532%2fstar-wye-electrical-connection-math-symbol%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
I made one leg a bit thicker, in the manner of Delta
.
Works across math styles.
documentclass{article}
usepackage{rotating,stackengine,scalerel}
newcommandwye{scalerel*{stackengine{-1pt}{%
rotatebox[origin=c]{30}{rule{10pt}{.9pt}}kern-1pt%
rotatebox[origin=c]{-30}{rule{10pt}{1.3pt}}}{%
rule{.9pt}{10pt}}{O}{c}{F}{F}{S}}{Delta}}
begin{document}
$Deltawye
scriptstyleDeltawye
scriptscriptstyleDeltawye$
end{document}
Merely changing the instances of {30}
and {-30}
to {40}
and {-40}
will change the aspect, while scalerel
will take care of the scaling automatically:
add a comment |
I made one leg a bit thicker, in the manner of Delta
.
Works across math styles.
documentclass{article}
usepackage{rotating,stackengine,scalerel}
newcommandwye{scalerel*{stackengine{-1pt}{%
rotatebox[origin=c]{30}{rule{10pt}{.9pt}}kern-1pt%
rotatebox[origin=c]{-30}{rule{10pt}{1.3pt}}}{%
rule{.9pt}{10pt}}{O}{c}{F}{F}{S}}{Delta}}
begin{document}
$Deltawye
scriptstyleDeltawye
scriptscriptstyleDeltawye$
end{document}
Merely changing the instances of {30}
and {-30}
to {40}
and {-40}
will change the aspect, while scalerel
will take care of the scaling automatically:
add a comment |
I made one leg a bit thicker, in the manner of Delta
.
Works across math styles.
documentclass{article}
usepackage{rotating,stackengine,scalerel}
newcommandwye{scalerel*{stackengine{-1pt}{%
rotatebox[origin=c]{30}{rule{10pt}{.9pt}}kern-1pt%
rotatebox[origin=c]{-30}{rule{10pt}{1.3pt}}}{%
rule{.9pt}{10pt}}{O}{c}{F}{F}{S}}{Delta}}
begin{document}
$Deltawye
scriptstyleDeltawye
scriptscriptstyleDeltawye$
end{document}
Merely changing the instances of {30}
and {-30}
to {40}
and {-40}
will change the aspect, while scalerel
will take care of the scaling automatically:
I made one leg a bit thicker, in the manner of Delta
.
Works across math styles.
documentclass{article}
usepackage{rotating,stackengine,scalerel}
newcommandwye{scalerel*{stackengine{-1pt}{%
rotatebox[origin=c]{30}{rule{10pt}{.9pt}}kern-1pt%
rotatebox[origin=c]{-30}{rule{10pt}{1.3pt}}}{%
rule{.9pt}{10pt}}{O}{c}{F}{F}{S}}{Delta}}
begin{document}
$Deltawye
scriptstyleDeltawye
scriptscriptstyleDeltawye$
end{document}
Merely changing the instances of {30}
and {-30}
to {40}
and {-40}
will change the aspect, while scalerel
will take care of the scaling automatically:
edited 15 hours ago
answered 15 hours ago
Steven B. SegletesSteven B. Segletes
159k9204413
159k9204413
add a comment |
add a comment |
TikZ? (Scalable line width added, great thanks to marmot!)
documentclass{article}
usepackage{tikz}
usepackage{amssymb}
newcommand{wye}{mathbin{tikz[x=1ex,y=1ex]{draw[line width=.1ex] (0,0)--(45:1)--++(-45:1) (45:1)--++(0,1);}}}
begin{document}
$1wye2$ {Huge $1wye2$}
end{document}
documentclass{article}
usepackage{tikz}
usepackage{amssymb}
newcommand{wye}{mathbin{tikz[x=1ex,y=1ex]{draw[line width=.1ex] (0,0)--(30:1)--++(-30:1) (30:1)--++(0,1);}}}
begin{document}
$1wye2$ {Huge $1wye2$}
end{document}
add a comment |
TikZ? (Scalable line width added, great thanks to marmot!)
documentclass{article}
usepackage{tikz}
usepackage{amssymb}
newcommand{wye}{mathbin{tikz[x=1ex,y=1ex]{draw[line width=.1ex] (0,0)--(45:1)--++(-45:1) (45:1)--++(0,1);}}}
begin{document}
$1wye2$ {Huge $1wye2$}
end{document}
documentclass{article}
usepackage{tikz}
usepackage{amssymb}
newcommand{wye}{mathbin{tikz[x=1ex,y=1ex]{draw[line width=.1ex] (0,0)--(30:1)--++(-30:1) (30:1)--++(0,1);}}}
begin{document}
$1wye2$ {Huge $1wye2$}
end{document}
add a comment |
TikZ? (Scalable line width added, great thanks to marmot!)
documentclass{article}
usepackage{tikz}
usepackage{amssymb}
newcommand{wye}{mathbin{tikz[x=1ex,y=1ex]{draw[line width=.1ex] (0,0)--(45:1)--++(-45:1) (45:1)--++(0,1);}}}
begin{document}
$1wye2$ {Huge $1wye2$}
end{document}
documentclass{article}
usepackage{tikz}
usepackage{amssymb}
newcommand{wye}{mathbin{tikz[x=1ex,y=1ex]{draw[line width=.1ex] (0,0)--(30:1)--++(-30:1) (30:1)--++(0,1);}}}
begin{document}
$1wye2$ {Huge $1wye2$}
end{document}
TikZ? (Scalable line width added, great thanks to marmot!)
documentclass{article}
usepackage{tikz}
usepackage{amssymb}
newcommand{wye}{mathbin{tikz[x=1ex,y=1ex]{draw[line width=.1ex] (0,0)--(45:1)--++(-45:1) (45:1)--++(0,1);}}}
begin{document}
$1wye2$ {Huge $1wye2$}
end{document}
documentclass{article}
usepackage{tikz}
usepackage{amssymb}
newcommand{wye}{mathbin{tikz[x=1ex,y=1ex]{draw[line width=.1ex] (0,0)--(30:1)--++(-30:1) (30:1)--++(0,1);}}}
begin{document}
$1wye2$ {Huge $1wye2$}
end{document}
edited 14 hours ago
answered 15 hours ago
JouleVJouleV
8,16222153
8,16222153
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to TeX - LaTeX Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f481532%2fstar-wye-electrical-connection-math-symbol%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown