Vertical Alignment Every Other Line and Wide Expressions





.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty{
margin-bottom:0;
}








5

















I'm sorry if this was asked elsewhere, but I couldn't find anything. I've had this question for a while now, and it really bothers me; I seem to run into these situations relatively often.



The generic problem is that I have a derivation I want to show in which I want to 1) align equals signs where appropriate but 2) the LHS at the start of the derivation is rather wide and 3) the intermediate results might spill across multiple lines, and I especially 4) need some of these intermediate results to print to the left of the alignment set up by the equals sign on the first line (because the LHS of the first line is wide and the intermediate lines are also wide).



What I'd really like is for the intermediate results to automatically justify similar to multline or, depending on the situation, for me to align them myself independently of the & from the enveloping align environment.



mathtools' multlined environment doesn't seem to work because all printing is to the right of the equals sign, which is itself to the right of a wide expression.



I've included some code below that shows my best attempt to tackle the problem, which required some fine tuning of a negative horizontal shift to try to align the right justification of the intermediate steps. I apologize that it's a bit hard to read.



documentclass{article}

usepackage{amsmath}

setlength{jot}{10pt}

newcommand{an}[1]{langle #1 rangle}

begin{document}

begin{align}
begin{split}
A(1^-6^-5^+2^+4^+3^-) & = frac{an{13}^3an{23}}{an{12}an{24}an{43}an{31}}frac{an{12}}{an{16}an{65}an{52}}biggl( \
& hspace{-0.8in} frac{langle2|6|1]}{langle2|5+6|1]}frac{an{26}^2}{(p_2+k_5+k_6)^2}frac{[12]}{an{12}}%frac{an{56}}{[56]}
+ frac{langle2|5|1]}{langle2|5+6|1]}frac{[15]^2}{(p_1+k_5+k_6)^2}frac{an{16}}{[16]}
biggr)end{split} \
begin{split} & = A(1^-2^+4^+3^-)frac{an{12}}{an{16}an{65}an{52}}biggl( \
& hspace{-0.5in} frac{1}{langle2|5+6|1]}frac{an{26}^3}{(p_2+k_5+k_6)^2}+ frac{langle2|5|1]}{langle2|5+6|1]}frac{[15]^2}{(p_1+k_5+k_6)^2}frac{an{16}}{[16]}
biggr)end{split}
end{align}

end{document}


I've included a picture of the output from the above code from my machine below:



enter image description here



Thank you very much for your help!










share|improve this question



























  • Welcome to TeX.SE.

    – Mico
    May 28 at 8:45


















5

















I'm sorry if this was asked elsewhere, but I couldn't find anything. I've had this question for a while now, and it really bothers me; I seem to run into these situations relatively often.



The generic problem is that I have a derivation I want to show in which I want to 1) align equals signs where appropriate but 2) the LHS at the start of the derivation is rather wide and 3) the intermediate results might spill across multiple lines, and I especially 4) need some of these intermediate results to print to the left of the alignment set up by the equals sign on the first line (because the LHS of the first line is wide and the intermediate lines are also wide).



What I'd really like is for the intermediate results to automatically justify similar to multline or, depending on the situation, for me to align them myself independently of the & from the enveloping align environment.



mathtools' multlined environment doesn't seem to work because all printing is to the right of the equals sign, which is itself to the right of a wide expression.



I've included some code below that shows my best attempt to tackle the problem, which required some fine tuning of a negative horizontal shift to try to align the right justification of the intermediate steps. I apologize that it's a bit hard to read.



documentclass{article}

usepackage{amsmath}

setlength{jot}{10pt}

newcommand{an}[1]{langle #1 rangle}

begin{document}

begin{align}
begin{split}
A(1^-6^-5^+2^+4^+3^-) & = frac{an{13}^3an{23}}{an{12}an{24}an{43}an{31}}frac{an{12}}{an{16}an{65}an{52}}biggl( \
& hspace{-0.8in} frac{langle2|6|1]}{langle2|5+6|1]}frac{an{26}^2}{(p_2+k_5+k_6)^2}frac{[12]}{an{12}}%frac{an{56}}{[56]}
+ frac{langle2|5|1]}{langle2|5+6|1]}frac{[15]^2}{(p_1+k_5+k_6)^2}frac{an{16}}{[16]}
biggr)end{split} \
begin{split} & = A(1^-2^+4^+3^-)frac{an{12}}{an{16}an{65}an{52}}biggl( \
& hspace{-0.5in} frac{1}{langle2|5+6|1]}frac{an{26}^3}{(p_2+k_5+k_6)^2}+ frac{langle2|5|1]}{langle2|5+6|1]}frac{[15]^2}{(p_1+k_5+k_6)^2}frac{an{16}}{[16]}
biggr)end{split}
end{align}

end{document}


I've included a picture of the output from the above code from my machine below:



enter image description here



Thank you very much for your help!










share|improve this question



























  • Welcome to TeX.SE.

    – Mico
    May 28 at 8:45














5












5








5








I'm sorry if this was asked elsewhere, but I couldn't find anything. I've had this question for a while now, and it really bothers me; I seem to run into these situations relatively often.



The generic problem is that I have a derivation I want to show in which I want to 1) align equals signs where appropriate but 2) the LHS at the start of the derivation is rather wide and 3) the intermediate results might spill across multiple lines, and I especially 4) need some of these intermediate results to print to the left of the alignment set up by the equals sign on the first line (because the LHS of the first line is wide and the intermediate lines are also wide).



What I'd really like is for the intermediate results to automatically justify similar to multline or, depending on the situation, for me to align them myself independently of the & from the enveloping align environment.



mathtools' multlined environment doesn't seem to work because all printing is to the right of the equals sign, which is itself to the right of a wide expression.



I've included some code below that shows my best attempt to tackle the problem, which required some fine tuning of a negative horizontal shift to try to align the right justification of the intermediate steps. I apologize that it's a bit hard to read.



documentclass{article}

usepackage{amsmath}

setlength{jot}{10pt}

newcommand{an}[1]{langle #1 rangle}

begin{document}

begin{align}
begin{split}
A(1^-6^-5^+2^+4^+3^-) & = frac{an{13}^3an{23}}{an{12}an{24}an{43}an{31}}frac{an{12}}{an{16}an{65}an{52}}biggl( \
& hspace{-0.8in} frac{langle2|6|1]}{langle2|5+6|1]}frac{an{26}^2}{(p_2+k_5+k_6)^2}frac{[12]}{an{12}}%frac{an{56}}{[56]}
+ frac{langle2|5|1]}{langle2|5+6|1]}frac{[15]^2}{(p_1+k_5+k_6)^2}frac{an{16}}{[16]}
biggr)end{split} \
begin{split} & = A(1^-2^+4^+3^-)frac{an{12}}{an{16}an{65}an{52}}biggl( \
& hspace{-0.5in} frac{1}{langle2|5+6|1]}frac{an{26}^3}{(p_2+k_5+k_6)^2}+ frac{langle2|5|1]}{langle2|5+6|1]}frac{[15]^2}{(p_1+k_5+k_6)^2}frac{an{16}}{[16]}
biggr)end{split}
end{align}

end{document}


I've included a picture of the output from the above code from my machine below:



enter image description here



Thank you very much for your help!










share|improve this question














I'm sorry if this was asked elsewhere, but I couldn't find anything. I've had this question for a while now, and it really bothers me; I seem to run into these situations relatively often.



The generic problem is that I have a derivation I want to show in which I want to 1) align equals signs where appropriate but 2) the LHS at the start of the derivation is rather wide and 3) the intermediate results might spill across multiple lines, and I especially 4) need some of these intermediate results to print to the left of the alignment set up by the equals sign on the first line (because the LHS of the first line is wide and the intermediate lines are also wide).



What I'd really like is for the intermediate results to automatically justify similar to multline or, depending on the situation, for me to align them myself independently of the & from the enveloping align environment.



mathtools' multlined environment doesn't seem to work because all printing is to the right of the equals sign, which is itself to the right of a wide expression.



I've included some code below that shows my best attempt to tackle the problem, which required some fine tuning of a negative horizontal shift to try to align the right justification of the intermediate steps. I apologize that it's a bit hard to read.



documentclass{article}

usepackage{amsmath}

setlength{jot}{10pt}

newcommand{an}[1]{langle #1 rangle}

begin{document}

begin{align}
begin{split}
A(1^-6^-5^+2^+4^+3^-) & = frac{an{13}^3an{23}}{an{12}an{24}an{43}an{31}}frac{an{12}}{an{16}an{65}an{52}}biggl( \
& hspace{-0.8in} frac{langle2|6|1]}{langle2|5+6|1]}frac{an{26}^2}{(p_2+k_5+k_6)^2}frac{[12]}{an{12}}%frac{an{56}}{[56]}
+ frac{langle2|5|1]}{langle2|5+6|1]}frac{[15]^2}{(p_1+k_5+k_6)^2}frac{an{16}}{[16]}
biggr)end{split} \
begin{split} & = A(1^-2^+4^+3^-)frac{an{12}}{an{16}an{65}an{52}}biggl( \
& hspace{-0.5in} frac{1}{langle2|5+6|1]}frac{an{26}^3}{(p_2+k_5+k_6)^2}+ frac{langle2|5|1]}{langle2|5+6|1]}frac{[15]^2}{(p_1+k_5+k_6)^2}frac{an{16}}{[16]}
biggr)end{split}
end{align}

end{document}


I've included a picture of the output from the above code from my machine below:



enter image description here



Thank you very much for your help!







vertical-alignment align amsmath multline






share|improve this question













share|improve this question











share|improve this question




share|improve this question



share|improve this question










asked May 28 at 8:26









WAHWAH

1263 bronze badges




1263 bronze badges
















  • Welcome to TeX.SE.

    – Mico
    May 28 at 8:45



















  • Welcome to TeX.SE.

    – Mico
    May 28 at 8:45

















Welcome to TeX.SE.

– Mico
May 28 at 8:45





Welcome to TeX.SE.

– Mico
May 28 at 8:45










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















3


















I propose two layouts, both based on align:



documentclass{article}

usepackage{amsmath,mathtools}

usepackage{showframe}

DeclarePairedDelimiter{an}{langle}{rangle}

begin{document}

begin{align}
A(1^-6^-5^+2^+4^+3^-)
& =
frac{an{13}^3an{23}}{an{12}an{24}an{43}an{31}}frac{an{12}}{an{16}an{65}an{52}} notag\
& quadcdotbiggl(
frac{langle2|6|1]}{langle2|5+6|1]}frac{an{26}^2}{(p_2+k_5+k_6)^2}frac{[12]}{an{12}} notag\
& qquad + frac{langle2|5|1]}{langle2|5+6|1]}frac{[15]^2}{(p_1+k_5+k_6)^2}frac{an{16}}{[16]}
biggr)
\
& =
A(1^-2^+4^+3^-)frac{an{12}}{an{16}an{65}an{52}} notag\
& quadcdotbiggl(
frac{1}{langle2|5+6|1]}frac{an{26}^3}{(p_2+k_5+k_6)^2} notag\
& qquad + frac{langle2|5|1]}{langle2|5+6|1]}frac{[15]^2}{(p_1+k_5+k_6)^2}frac{an{16}}{[16]}
biggr)
end{align}

begin{align}
&lefteqn{A(1^-6^-5^+2^+4^+3^-)=} notag \
& =
frac{an{13}^3an{23}}{an{12}an{24}an{43}an{31}}frac{an{12}}{an{16}an{65}an{52}} notag\
& quadcdotbiggl(
frac{langle2|6|1]}{langle2|5+6|1]}frac{an{26}^2}{(p_2+k_5+k_6)^2}frac{[12]}{an{12}}
+ frac{langle2|5|1]}{langle2|5+6|1]}frac{[15]^2}{(p_1+k_5+k_6)^2}frac{an{16}}{[16]}
biggr)
\
& =
A(1^-2^+4^+3^-)frac{an{12}}{an{16}an{65}an{52}} notag\
& quadcdotbiggl(
frac{1}{langle2|5+6|1]}frac{an{26}^3}{(p_2+k_5+k_6)^2}
+ frac{langle2|5|1]}{langle2|5+6|1]}frac{[15]^2}{(p_1+k_5+k_6)^2}frac{an{16}}{[16]}
biggr)
end{align}

end{document}


Note that showframe is used just to show the margins of the text block.



enter image description here






share|improve this answer



























  • Hi egreg, thank you very much for taking the time to submit an answer to my question. I like the layout of your second suggestion. But I don't think that either suggestion answers my original question. The first suggestion leaves a huge amount of empty space on the left because all text is to the right of the aligned equals. And for the second I don't see how one could further down align to the topmost equals sign as I want to.

    – WAH
    May 28 at 12:30











  • @WAH Use a very wide page. I'm not sure what you actually want, to be honest.

    – egreg
    May 28 at 12:34











  • Hi egreg, I'd like a result formatted like in the output I showed, but with the intermediate lines aligned on the right (instead of approximately aligned from the fine tuning of the negative hspace used). An aligned-inception, so to speak. Or, second best case, have the intermediate lines right justified. But in either of these cases, I want the ability for the intermediate lines to be written to the left of the aligned equals signs, as is shown in the output I provided.

    – WAH
    May 28 at 12:40



















2


















documentclass[a4paper]{article}
usepackage{mathtools}
newcommand{an}[1]{langle #1 rangle}
begin{document}

begin{multline}
A(1^-6^-5^+2^+4^+3^-) =
frac{an{13}^3an{23}}{an{12}an{24}an{43}an{31}}frac{an{12}}{an{16}an{65}an{52}}cdot\
biggl(frac{langle2|6|1]}{langle2|5+6|1]}frac{an{26}^2}{(p_2+k_5+k_6)^2}frac{[12]}{an{12}}%frac{an{56}}{[56]}
+ frac{langle2|5|1]}{langle2|5+6|1]}frac{[15]^2}{(p_1+k_5+k_6)^2}frac{an{16}}{[16]}
biggr)
end{multline}
begin{multline}
phantom{A(1^-6^-5^+2^+4^+3^-)} =
A(1^-2^+4^+3^-)frac{an{12}}{an{16}an{65}an{52}}cdot\
biggl(frac{1}{langle2|5+6|1]}frac{an{26}^3}{(p_2+k_5+k_6)^2}+
frac{langle2|5|1]}{langle2|5+6|1]}frac{[15]^2}{(p_1+k_5+k_6)^2}frac{an{16}}{[16]}
biggr)
end{multline}

end{document}


enter image description here



or with only one equation number:



documentclass[a4paper]{article}
usepackage{mathtools}
newcommand{an}[1]{langle #1 rangle}
begin{document}

begin{multline}
A(1^-6^-5^+2^+4^+3^-) =
frac{an{13}^3an{23}}{an{12}an{24}an{43}an{31}}frac{an{12}}{an{16}an{65}an{52}}cdot\
biggl(frac{langle2|6|1]}{langle2|5+6|1]}frac{an{26}^2}{(p_2+k_5+k_6)^2}frac{[12]}{an{12}}%frac{an{56}}{[56]}
+ frac{langle2|5|1]}{langle2|5+6|1]}frac{[15]^2}{(p_1+k_5+k_6)^2}frac{an{16}}{[16]}
biggr) \
shoveleft{phantom{A(1^-6^-5^+2^+4^+3^-)} =
A(1^-2^+4^+3^-)frac{an{12}}{an{16}an{65}an{52}}cdot}\
biggl(frac{1}{langle2|5+6|1]}frac{an{26}^3}{(p_2+k_5+k_6)^2}+
frac{langle2|5|1]}{langle2|5+6|1]}frac{[15]^2}{(p_1+k_5+k_6)^2}frac{an{16}}{[16]}
biggr)
end{multline}

end{document}


enter image description here






share|improve this answer





























  • Hi Red-Cloud, thank you very much for submitting an answer to my question. Using phantom is a good idea I hadn't thought of. I feel like your solution could be improved. First, you're really making two different equations; the vertical spacing isn't quite right, and LaTeX will more likely split the result across two pages. Second, what if I perform some manipulations on the LHS that I wish to display so that it's not so easy to align the equals sign, but would rather require fine tuning?

    – WAH
    May 28 at 11:10











  • see extended answer.

    – user187802
    May 28 at 11:19











  • Hi Red-Cloud, thank you very much for extending your answer. The new suggestion is better because it's now a single equation block. But I still don't see how to get the vertical alignment without fine tuning if the LHS changes in a non-trivial way. For example, suppose I wanted the LHS to become $thereforeGamma$? (I recognize that this is a bit contrived, but I have run across these kinds of situations before.)

    – WAH
    May 28 at 11:55













Your Answer








StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "85"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/"u003ecc by-sa 4.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});















draft saved

draft discarded
















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f492997%2fvertical-alignment-every-other-line-and-wide-expressions%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown


























2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes








2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









3


















I propose two layouts, both based on align:



documentclass{article}

usepackage{amsmath,mathtools}

usepackage{showframe}

DeclarePairedDelimiter{an}{langle}{rangle}

begin{document}

begin{align}
A(1^-6^-5^+2^+4^+3^-)
& =
frac{an{13}^3an{23}}{an{12}an{24}an{43}an{31}}frac{an{12}}{an{16}an{65}an{52}} notag\
& quadcdotbiggl(
frac{langle2|6|1]}{langle2|5+6|1]}frac{an{26}^2}{(p_2+k_5+k_6)^2}frac{[12]}{an{12}} notag\
& qquad + frac{langle2|5|1]}{langle2|5+6|1]}frac{[15]^2}{(p_1+k_5+k_6)^2}frac{an{16}}{[16]}
biggr)
\
& =
A(1^-2^+4^+3^-)frac{an{12}}{an{16}an{65}an{52}} notag\
& quadcdotbiggl(
frac{1}{langle2|5+6|1]}frac{an{26}^3}{(p_2+k_5+k_6)^2} notag\
& qquad + frac{langle2|5|1]}{langle2|5+6|1]}frac{[15]^2}{(p_1+k_5+k_6)^2}frac{an{16}}{[16]}
biggr)
end{align}

begin{align}
&lefteqn{A(1^-6^-5^+2^+4^+3^-)=} notag \
& =
frac{an{13}^3an{23}}{an{12}an{24}an{43}an{31}}frac{an{12}}{an{16}an{65}an{52}} notag\
& quadcdotbiggl(
frac{langle2|6|1]}{langle2|5+6|1]}frac{an{26}^2}{(p_2+k_5+k_6)^2}frac{[12]}{an{12}}
+ frac{langle2|5|1]}{langle2|5+6|1]}frac{[15]^2}{(p_1+k_5+k_6)^2}frac{an{16}}{[16]}
biggr)
\
& =
A(1^-2^+4^+3^-)frac{an{12}}{an{16}an{65}an{52}} notag\
& quadcdotbiggl(
frac{1}{langle2|5+6|1]}frac{an{26}^3}{(p_2+k_5+k_6)^2}
+ frac{langle2|5|1]}{langle2|5+6|1]}frac{[15]^2}{(p_1+k_5+k_6)^2}frac{an{16}}{[16]}
biggr)
end{align}

end{document}


Note that showframe is used just to show the margins of the text block.



enter image description here






share|improve this answer



























  • Hi egreg, thank you very much for taking the time to submit an answer to my question. I like the layout of your second suggestion. But I don't think that either suggestion answers my original question. The first suggestion leaves a huge amount of empty space on the left because all text is to the right of the aligned equals. And for the second I don't see how one could further down align to the topmost equals sign as I want to.

    – WAH
    May 28 at 12:30











  • @WAH Use a very wide page. I'm not sure what you actually want, to be honest.

    – egreg
    May 28 at 12:34











  • Hi egreg, I'd like a result formatted like in the output I showed, but with the intermediate lines aligned on the right (instead of approximately aligned from the fine tuning of the negative hspace used). An aligned-inception, so to speak. Or, second best case, have the intermediate lines right justified. But in either of these cases, I want the ability for the intermediate lines to be written to the left of the aligned equals signs, as is shown in the output I provided.

    – WAH
    May 28 at 12:40
















3


















I propose two layouts, both based on align:



documentclass{article}

usepackage{amsmath,mathtools}

usepackage{showframe}

DeclarePairedDelimiter{an}{langle}{rangle}

begin{document}

begin{align}
A(1^-6^-5^+2^+4^+3^-)
& =
frac{an{13}^3an{23}}{an{12}an{24}an{43}an{31}}frac{an{12}}{an{16}an{65}an{52}} notag\
& quadcdotbiggl(
frac{langle2|6|1]}{langle2|5+6|1]}frac{an{26}^2}{(p_2+k_5+k_6)^2}frac{[12]}{an{12}} notag\
& qquad + frac{langle2|5|1]}{langle2|5+6|1]}frac{[15]^2}{(p_1+k_5+k_6)^2}frac{an{16}}{[16]}
biggr)
\
& =
A(1^-2^+4^+3^-)frac{an{12}}{an{16}an{65}an{52}} notag\
& quadcdotbiggl(
frac{1}{langle2|5+6|1]}frac{an{26}^3}{(p_2+k_5+k_6)^2} notag\
& qquad + frac{langle2|5|1]}{langle2|5+6|1]}frac{[15]^2}{(p_1+k_5+k_6)^2}frac{an{16}}{[16]}
biggr)
end{align}

begin{align}
&lefteqn{A(1^-6^-5^+2^+4^+3^-)=} notag \
& =
frac{an{13}^3an{23}}{an{12}an{24}an{43}an{31}}frac{an{12}}{an{16}an{65}an{52}} notag\
& quadcdotbiggl(
frac{langle2|6|1]}{langle2|5+6|1]}frac{an{26}^2}{(p_2+k_5+k_6)^2}frac{[12]}{an{12}}
+ frac{langle2|5|1]}{langle2|5+6|1]}frac{[15]^2}{(p_1+k_5+k_6)^2}frac{an{16}}{[16]}
biggr)
\
& =
A(1^-2^+4^+3^-)frac{an{12}}{an{16}an{65}an{52}} notag\
& quadcdotbiggl(
frac{1}{langle2|5+6|1]}frac{an{26}^3}{(p_2+k_5+k_6)^2}
+ frac{langle2|5|1]}{langle2|5+6|1]}frac{[15]^2}{(p_1+k_5+k_6)^2}frac{an{16}}{[16]}
biggr)
end{align}

end{document}


Note that showframe is used just to show the margins of the text block.



enter image description here






share|improve this answer



























  • Hi egreg, thank you very much for taking the time to submit an answer to my question. I like the layout of your second suggestion. But I don't think that either suggestion answers my original question. The first suggestion leaves a huge amount of empty space on the left because all text is to the right of the aligned equals. And for the second I don't see how one could further down align to the topmost equals sign as I want to.

    – WAH
    May 28 at 12:30











  • @WAH Use a very wide page. I'm not sure what you actually want, to be honest.

    – egreg
    May 28 at 12:34











  • Hi egreg, I'd like a result formatted like in the output I showed, but with the intermediate lines aligned on the right (instead of approximately aligned from the fine tuning of the negative hspace used). An aligned-inception, so to speak. Or, second best case, have the intermediate lines right justified. But in either of these cases, I want the ability for the intermediate lines to be written to the left of the aligned equals signs, as is shown in the output I provided.

    – WAH
    May 28 at 12:40














3














3










3









I propose two layouts, both based on align:



documentclass{article}

usepackage{amsmath,mathtools}

usepackage{showframe}

DeclarePairedDelimiter{an}{langle}{rangle}

begin{document}

begin{align}
A(1^-6^-5^+2^+4^+3^-)
& =
frac{an{13}^3an{23}}{an{12}an{24}an{43}an{31}}frac{an{12}}{an{16}an{65}an{52}} notag\
& quadcdotbiggl(
frac{langle2|6|1]}{langle2|5+6|1]}frac{an{26}^2}{(p_2+k_5+k_6)^2}frac{[12]}{an{12}} notag\
& qquad + frac{langle2|5|1]}{langle2|5+6|1]}frac{[15]^2}{(p_1+k_5+k_6)^2}frac{an{16}}{[16]}
biggr)
\
& =
A(1^-2^+4^+3^-)frac{an{12}}{an{16}an{65}an{52}} notag\
& quadcdotbiggl(
frac{1}{langle2|5+6|1]}frac{an{26}^3}{(p_2+k_5+k_6)^2} notag\
& qquad + frac{langle2|5|1]}{langle2|5+6|1]}frac{[15]^2}{(p_1+k_5+k_6)^2}frac{an{16}}{[16]}
biggr)
end{align}

begin{align}
&lefteqn{A(1^-6^-5^+2^+4^+3^-)=} notag \
& =
frac{an{13}^3an{23}}{an{12}an{24}an{43}an{31}}frac{an{12}}{an{16}an{65}an{52}} notag\
& quadcdotbiggl(
frac{langle2|6|1]}{langle2|5+6|1]}frac{an{26}^2}{(p_2+k_5+k_6)^2}frac{[12]}{an{12}}
+ frac{langle2|5|1]}{langle2|5+6|1]}frac{[15]^2}{(p_1+k_5+k_6)^2}frac{an{16}}{[16]}
biggr)
\
& =
A(1^-2^+4^+3^-)frac{an{12}}{an{16}an{65}an{52}} notag\
& quadcdotbiggl(
frac{1}{langle2|5+6|1]}frac{an{26}^3}{(p_2+k_5+k_6)^2}
+ frac{langle2|5|1]}{langle2|5+6|1]}frac{[15]^2}{(p_1+k_5+k_6)^2}frac{an{16}}{[16]}
biggr)
end{align}

end{document}


Note that showframe is used just to show the margins of the text block.



enter image description here






share|improve this answer














I propose two layouts, both based on align:



documentclass{article}

usepackage{amsmath,mathtools}

usepackage{showframe}

DeclarePairedDelimiter{an}{langle}{rangle}

begin{document}

begin{align}
A(1^-6^-5^+2^+4^+3^-)
& =
frac{an{13}^3an{23}}{an{12}an{24}an{43}an{31}}frac{an{12}}{an{16}an{65}an{52}} notag\
& quadcdotbiggl(
frac{langle2|6|1]}{langle2|5+6|1]}frac{an{26}^2}{(p_2+k_5+k_6)^2}frac{[12]}{an{12}} notag\
& qquad + frac{langle2|5|1]}{langle2|5+6|1]}frac{[15]^2}{(p_1+k_5+k_6)^2}frac{an{16}}{[16]}
biggr)
\
& =
A(1^-2^+4^+3^-)frac{an{12}}{an{16}an{65}an{52}} notag\
& quadcdotbiggl(
frac{1}{langle2|5+6|1]}frac{an{26}^3}{(p_2+k_5+k_6)^2} notag\
& qquad + frac{langle2|5|1]}{langle2|5+6|1]}frac{[15]^2}{(p_1+k_5+k_6)^2}frac{an{16}}{[16]}
biggr)
end{align}

begin{align}
&lefteqn{A(1^-6^-5^+2^+4^+3^-)=} notag \
& =
frac{an{13}^3an{23}}{an{12}an{24}an{43}an{31}}frac{an{12}}{an{16}an{65}an{52}} notag\
& quadcdotbiggl(
frac{langle2|6|1]}{langle2|5+6|1]}frac{an{26}^2}{(p_2+k_5+k_6)^2}frac{[12]}{an{12}}
+ frac{langle2|5|1]}{langle2|5+6|1]}frac{[15]^2}{(p_1+k_5+k_6)^2}frac{an{16}}{[16]}
biggr)
\
& =
A(1^-2^+4^+3^-)frac{an{12}}{an{16}an{65}an{52}} notag\
& quadcdotbiggl(
frac{1}{langle2|5+6|1]}frac{an{26}^3}{(p_2+k_5+k_6)^2}
+ frac{langle2|5|1]}{langle2|5+6|1]}frac{[15]^2}{(p_1+k_5+k_6)^2}frac{an{16}}{[16]}
biggr)
end{align}

end{document}


Note that showframe is used just to show the margins of the text block.



enter image description here







share|improve this answer













share|improve this answer




share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer










answered May 28 at 12:11









egregegreg

773k92 gold badges2017 silver badges3378 bronze badges




773k92 gold badges2017 silver badges3378 bronze badges
















  • Hi egreg, thank you very much for taking the time to submit an answer to my question. I like the layout of your second suggestion. But I don't think that either suggestion answers my original question. The first suggestion leaves a huge amount of empty space on the left because all text is to the right of the aligned equals. And for the second I don't see how one could further down align to the topmost equals sign as I want to.

    – WAH
    May 28 at 12:30











  • @WAH Use a very wide page. I'm not sure what you actually want, to be honest.

    – egreg
    May 28 at 12:34











  • Hi egreg, I'd like a result formatted like in the output I showed, but with the intermediate lines aligned on the right (instead of approximately aligned from the fine tuning of the negative hspace used). An aligned-inception, so to speak. Or, second best case, have the intermediate lines right justified. But in either of these cases, I want the ability for the intermediate lines to be written to the left of the aligned equals signs, as is shown in the output I provided.

    – WAH
    May 28 at 12:40



















  • Hi egreg, thank you very much for taking the time to submit an answer to my question. I like the layout of your second suggestion. But I don't think that either suggestion answers my original question. The first suggestion leaves a huge amount of empty space on the left because all text is to the right of the aligned equals. And for the second I don't see how one could further down align to the topmost equals sign as I want to.

    – WAH
    May 28 at 12:30











  • @WAH Use a very wide page. I'm not sure what you actually want, to be honest.

    – egreg
    May 28 at 12:34











  • Hi egreg, I'd like a result formatted like in the output I showed, but with the intermediate lines aligned on the right (instead of approximately aligned from the fine tuning of the negative hspace used). An aligned-inception, so to speak. Or, second best case, have the intermediate lines right justified. But in either of these cases, I want the ability for the intermediate lines to be written to the left of the aligned equals signs, as is shown in the output I provided.

    – WAH
    May 28 at 12:40

















Hi egreg, thank you very much for taking the time to submit an answer to my question. I like the layout of your second suggestion. But I don't think that either suggestion answers my original question. The first suggestion leaves a huge amount of empty space on the left because all text is to the right of the aligned equals. And for the second I don't see how one could further down align to the topmost equals sign as I want to.

– WAH
May 28 at 12:30





Hi egreg, thank you very much for taking the time to submit an answer to my question. I like the layout of your second suggestion. But I don't think that either suggestion answers my original question. The first suggestion leaves a huge amount of empty space on the left because all text is to the right of the aligned equals. And for the second I don't see how one could further down align to the topmost equals sign as I want to.

– WAH
May 28 at 12:30













@WAH Use a very wide page. I'm not sure what you actually want, to be honest.

– egreg
May 28 at 12:34





@WAH Use a very wide page. I'm not sure what you actually want, to be honest.

– egreg
May 28 at 12:34













Hi egreg, I'd like a result formatted like in the output I showed, but with the intermediate lines aligned on the right (instead of approximately aligned from the fine tuning of the negative hspace used). An aligned-inception, so to speak. Or, second best case, have the intermediate lines right justified. But in either of these cases, I want the ability for the intermediate lines to be written to the left of the aligned equals signs, as is shown in the output I provided.

– WAH
May 28 at 12:40





Hi egreg, I'd like a result formatted like in the output I showed, but with the intermediate lines aligned on the right (instead of approximately aligned from the fine tuning of the negative hspace used). An aligned-inception, so to speak. Or, second best case, have the intermediate lines right justified. But in either of these cases, I want the ability for the intermediate lines to be written to the left of the aligned equals signs, as is shown in the output I provided.

– WAH
May 28 at 12:40













2


















documentclass[a4paper]{article}
usepackage{mathtools}
newcommand{an}[1]{langle #1 rangle}
begin{document}

begin{multline}
A(1^-6^-5^+2^+4^+3^-) =
frac{an{13}^3an{23}}{an{12}an{24}an{43}an{31}}frac{an{12}}{an{16}an{65}an{52}}cdot\
biggl(frac{langle2|6|1]}{langle2|5+6|1]}frac{an{26}^2}{(p_2+k_5+k_6)^2}frac{[12]}{an{12}}%frac{an{56}}{[56]}
+ frac{langle2|5|1]}{langle2|5+6|1]}frac{[15]^2}{(p_1+k_5+k_6)^2}frac{an{16}}{[16]}
biggr)
end{multline}
begin{multline}
phantom{A(1^-6^-5^+2^+4^+3^-)} =
A(1^-2^+4^+3^-)frac{an{12}}{an{16}an{65}an{52}}cdot\
biggl(frac{1}{langle2|5+6|1]}frac{an{26}^3}{(p_2+k_5+k_6)^2}+
frac{langle2|5|1]}{langle2|5+6|1]}frac{[15]^2}{(p_1+k_5+k_6)^2}frac{an{16}}{[16]}
biggr)
end{multline}

end{document}


enter image description here



or with only one equation number:



documentclass[a4paper]{article}
usepackage{mathtools}
newcommand{an}[1]{langle #1 rangle}
begin{document}

begin{multline}
A(1^-6^-5^+2^+4^+3^-) =
frac{an{13}^3an{23}}{an{12}an{24}an{43}an{31}}frac{an{12}}{an{16}an{65}an{52}}cdot\
biggl(frac{langle2|6|1]}{langle2|5+6|1]}frac{an{26}^2}{(p_2+k_5+k_6)^2}frac{[12]}{an{12}}%frac{an{56}}{[56]}
+ frac{langle2|5|1]}{langle2|5+6|1]}frac{[15]^2}{(p_1+k_5+k_6)^2}frac{an{16}}{[16]}
biggr) \
shoveleft{phantom{A(1^-6^-5^+2^+4^+3^-)} =
A(1^-2^+4^+3^-)frac{an{12}}{an{16}an{65}an{52}}cdot}\
biggl(frac{1}{langle2|5+6|1]}frac{an{26}^3}{(p_2+k_5+k_6)^2}+
frac{langle2|5|1]}{langle2|5+6|1]}frac{[15]^2}{(p_1+k_5+k_6)^2}frac{an{16}}{[16]}
biggr)
end{multline}

end{document}


enter image description here






share|improve this answer





























  • Hi Red-Cloud, thank you very much for submitting an answer to my question. Using phantom is a good idea I hadn't thought of. I feel like your solution could be improved. First, you're really making two different equations; the vertical spacing isn't quite right, and LaTeX will more likely split the result across two pages. Second, what if I perform some manipulations on the LHS that I wish to display so that it's not so easy to align the equals sign, but would rather require fine tuning?

    – WAH
    May 28 at 11:10











  • see extended answer.

    – user187802
    May 28 at 11:19











  • Hi Red-Cloud, thank you very much for extending your answer. The new suggestion is better because it's now a single equation block. But I still don't see how to get the vertical alignment without fine tuning if the LHS changes in a non-trivial way. For example, suppose I wanted the LHS to become $thereforeGamma$? (I recognize that this is a bit contrived, but I have run across these kinds of situations before.)

    – WAH
    May 28 at 11:55
















2


















documentclass[a4paper]{article}
usepackage{mathtools}
newcommand{an}[1]{langle #1 rangle}
begin{document}

begin{multline}
A(1^-6^-5^+2^+4^+3^-) =
frac{an{13}^3an{23}}{an{12}an{24}an{43}an{31}}frac{an{12}}{an{16}an{65}an{52}}cdot\
biggl(frac{langle2|6|1]}{langle2|5+6|1]}frac{an{26}^2}{(p_2+k_5+k_6)^2}frac{[12]}{an{12}}%frac{an{56}}{[56]}
+ frac{langle2|5|1]}{langle2|5+6|1]}frac{[15]^2}{(p_1+k_5+k_6)^2}frac{an{16}}{[16]}
biggr)
end{multline}
begin{multline}
phantom{A(1^-6^-5^+2^+4^+3^-)} =
A(1^-2^+4^+3^-)frac{an{12}}{an{16}an{65}an{52}}cdot\
biggl(frac{1}{langle2|5+6|1]}frac{an{26}^3}{(p_2+k_5+k_6)^2}+
frac{langle2|5|1]}{langle2|5+6|1]}frac{[15]^2}{(p_1+k_5+k_6)^2}frac{an{16}}{[16]}
biggr)
end{multline}

end{document}


enter image description here



or with only one equation number:



documentclass[a4paper]{article}
usepackage{mathtools}
newcommand{an}[1]{langle #1 rangle}
begin{document}

begin{multline}
A(1^-6^-5^+2^+4^+3^-) =
frac{an{13}^3an{23}}{an{12}an{24}an{43}an{31}}frac{an{12}}{an{16}an{65}an{52}}cdot\
biggl(frac{langle2|6|1]}{langle2|5+6|1]}frac{an{26}^2}{(p_2+k_5+k_6)^2}frac{[12]}{an{12}}%frac{an{56}}{[56]}
+ frac{langle2|5|1]}{langle2|5+6|1]}frac{[15]^2}{(p_1+k_5+k_6)^2}frac{an{16}}{[16]}
biggr) \
shoveleft{phantom{A(1^-6^-5^+2^+4^+3^-)} =
A(1^-2^+4^+3^-)frac{an{12}}{an{16}an{65}an{52}}cdot}\
biggl(frac{1}{langle2|5+6|1]}frac{an{26}^3}{(p_2+k_5+k_6)^2}+
frac{langle2|5|1]}{langle2|5+6|1]}frac{[15]^2}{(p_1+k_5+k_6)^2}frac{an{16}}{[16]}
biggr)
end{multline}

end{document}


enter image description here






share|improve this answer





























  • Hi Red-Cloud, thank you very much for submitting an answer to my question. Using phantom is a good idea I hadn't thought of. I feel like your solution could be improved. First, you're really making two different equations; the vertical spacing isn't quite right, and LaTeX will more likely split the result across two pages. Second, what if I perform some manipulations on the LHS that I wish to display so that it's not so easy to align the equals sign, but would rather require fine tuning?

    – WAH
    May 28 at 11:10











  • see extended answer.

    – user187802
    May 28 at 11:19











  • Hi Red-Cloud, thank you very much for extending your answer. The new suggestion is better because it's now a single equation block. But I still don't see how to get the vertical alignment without fine tuning if the LHS changes in a non-trivial way. For example, suppose I wanted the LHS to become $thereforeGamma$? (I recognize that this is a bit contrived, but I have run across these kinds of situations before.)

    – WAH
    May 28 at 11:55














2














2










2









documentclass[a4paper]{article}
usepackage{mathtools}
newcommand{an}[1]{langle #1 rangle}
begin{document}

begin{multline}
A(1^-6^-5^+2^+4^+3^-) =
frac{an{13}^3an{23}}{an{12}an{24}an{43}an{31}}frac{an{12}}{an{16}an{65}an{52}}cdot\
biggl(frac{langle2|6|1]}{langle2|5+6|1]}frac{an{26}^2}{(p_2+k_5+k_6)^2}frac{[12]}{an{12}}%frac{an{56}}{[56]}
+ frac{langle2|5|1]}{langle2|5+6|1]}frac{[15]^2}{(p_1+k_5+k_6)^2}frac{an{16}}{[16]}
biggr)
end{multline}
begin{multline}
phantom{A(1^-6^-5^+2^+4^+3^-)} =
A(1^-2^+4^+3^-)frac{an{12}}{an{16}an{65}an{52}}cdot\
biggl(frac{1}{langle2|5+6|1]}frac{an{26}^3}{(p_2+k_5+k_6)^2}+
frac{langle2|5|1]}{langle2|5+6|1]}frac{[15]^2}{(p_1+k_5+k_6)^2}frac{an{16}}{[16]}
biggr)
end{multline}

end{document}


enter image description here



or with only one equation number:



documentclass[a4paper]{article}
usepackage{mathtools}
newcommand{an}[1]{langle #1 rangle}
begin{document}

begin{multline}
A(1^-6^-5^+2^+4^+3^-) =
frac{an{13}^3an{23}}{an{12}an{24}an{43}an{31}}frac{an{12}}{an{16}an{65}an{52}}cdot\
biggl(frac{langle2|6|1]}{langle2|5+6|1]}frac{an{26}^2}{(p_2+k_5+k_6)^2}frac{[12]}{an{12}}%frac{an{56}}{[56]}
+ frac{langle2|5|1]}{langle2|5+6|1]}frac{[15]^2}{(p_1+k_5+k_6)^2}frac{an{16}}{[16]}
biggr) \
shoveleft{phantom{A(1^-6^-5^+2^+4^+3^-)} =
A(1^-2^+4^+3^-)frac{an{12}}{an{16}an{65}an{52}}cdot}\
biggl(frac{1}{langle2|5+6|1]}frac{an{26}^3}{(p_2+k_5+k_6)^2}+
frac{langle2|5|1]}{langle2|5+6|1]}frac{[15]^2}{(p_1+k_5+k_6)^2}frac{an{16}}{[16]}
biggr)
end{multline}

end{document}


enter image description here






share|improve this answer
















documentclass[a4paper]{article}
usepackage{mathtools}
newcommand{an}[1]{langle #1 rangle}
begin{document}

begin{multline}
A(1^-6^-5^+2^+4^+3^-) =
frac{an{13}^3an{23}}{an{12}an{24}an{43}an{31}}frac{an{12}}{an{16}an{65}an{52}}cdot\
biggl(frac{langle2|6|1]}{langle2|5+6|1]}frac{an{26}^2}{(p_2+k_5+k_6)^2}frac{[12]}{an{12}}%frac{an{56}}{[56]}
+ frac{langle2|5|1]}{langle2|5+6|1]}frac{[15]^2}{(p_1+k_5+k_6)^2}frac{an{16}}{[16]}
biggr)
end{multline}
begin{multline}
phantom{A(1^-6^-5^+2^+4^+3^-)} =
A(1^-2^+4^+3^-)frac{an{12}}{an{16}an{65}an{52}}cdot\
biggl(frac{1}{langle2|5+6|1]}frac{an{26}^3}{(p_2+k_5+k_6)^2}+
frac{langle2|5|1]}{langle2|5+6|1]}frac{[15]^2}{(p_1+k_5+k_6)^2}frac{an{16}}{[16]}
biggr)
end{multline}

end{document}


enter image description here



or with only one equation number:



documentclass[a4paper]{article}
usepackage{mathtools}
newcommand{an}[1]{langle #1 rangle}
begin{document}

begin{multline}
A(1^-6^-5^+2^+4^+3^-) =
frac{an{13}^3an{23}}{an{12}an{24}an{43}an{31}}frac{an{12}}{an{16}an{65}an{52}}cdot\
biggl(frac{langle2|6|1]}{langle2|5+6|1]}frac{an{26}^2}{(p_2+k_5+k_6)^2}frac{[12]}{an{12}}%frac{an{56}}{[56]}
+ frac{langle2|5|1]}{langle2|5+6|1]}frac{[15]^2}{(p_1+k_5+k_6)^2}frac{an{16}}{[16]}
biggr) \
shoveleft{phantom{A(1^-6^-5^+2^+4^+3^-)} =
A(1^-2^+4^+3^-)frac{an{12}}{an{16}an{65}an{52}}cdot}\
biggl(frac{1}{langle2|5+6|1]}frac{an{26}^3}{(p_2+k_5+k_6)^2}+
frac{langle2|5|1]}{langle2|5+6|1]}frac{[15]^2}{(p_1+k_5+k_6)^2}frac{an{16}}{[16]}
biggr)
end{multline}

end{document}


enter image description here







share|improve this answer















share|improve this answer




share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer








edited May 28 at 11:19

























answered May 28 at 10:38









user187802user187802

6,2431 gold badge2 silver badges19 bronze badges




6,2431 gold badge2 silver badges19 bronze badges
















  • Hi Red-Cloud, thank you very much for submitting an answer to my question. Using phantom is a good idea I hadn't thought of. I feel like your solution could be improved. First, you're really making two different equations; the vertical spacing isn't quite right, and LaTeX will more likely split the result across two pages. Second, what if I perform some manipulations on the LHS that I wish to display so that it's not so easy to align the equals sign, but would rather require fine tuning?

    – WAH
    May 28 at 11:10











  • see extended answer.

    – user187802
    May 28 at 11:19











  • Hi Red-Cloud, thank you very much for extending your answer. The new suggestion is better because it's now a single equation block. But I still don't see how to get the vertical alignment without fine tuning if the LHS changes in a non-trivial way. For example, suppose I wanted the LHS to become $thereforeGamma$? (I recognize that this is a bit contrived, but I have run across these kinds of situations before.)

    – WAH
    May 28 at 11:55



















  • Hi Red-Cloud, thank you very much for submitting an answer to my question. Using phantom is a good idea I hadn't thought of. I feel like your solution could be improved. First, you're really making two different equations; the vertical spacing isn't quite right, and LaTeX will more likely split the result across two pages. Second, what if I perform some manipulations on the LHS that I wish to display so that it's not so easy to align the equals sign, but would rather require fine tuning?

    – WAH
    May 28 at 11:10











  • see extended answer.

    – user187802
    May 28 at 11:19











  • Hi Red-Cloud, thank you very much for extending your answer. The new suggestion is better because it's now a single equation block. But I still don't see how to get the vertical alignment without fine tuning if the LHS changes in a non-trivial way. For example, suppose I wanted the LHS to become $thereforeGamma$? (I recognize that this is a bit contrived, but I have run across these kinds of situations before.)

    – WAH
    May 28 at 11:55

















Hi Red-Cloud, thank you very much for submitting an answer to my question. Using phantom is a good idea I hadn't thought of. I feel like your solution could be improved. First, you're really making two different equations; the vertical spacing isn't quite right, and LaTeX will more likely split the result across two pages. Second, what if I perform some manipulations on the LHS that I wish to display so that it's not so easy to align the equals sign, but would rather require fine tuning?

– WAH
May 28 at 11:10





Hi Red-Cloud, thank you very much for submitting an answer to my question. Using phantom is a good idea I hadn't thought of. I feel like your solution could be improved. First, you're really making two different equations; the vertical spacing isn't quite right, and LaTeX will more likely split the result across two pages. Second, what if I perform some manipulations on the LHS that I wish to display so that it's not so easy to align the equals sign, but would rather require fine tuning?

– WAH
May 28 at 11:10













see extended answer.

– user187802
May 28 at 11:19





see extended answer.

– user187802
May 28 at 11:19













Hi Red-Cloud, thank you very much for extending your answer. The new suggestion is better because it's now a single equation block. But I still don't see how to get the vertical alignment without fine tuning if the LHS changes in a non-trivial way. For example, suppose I wanted the LHS to become $thereforeGamma$? (I recognize that this is a bit contrived, but I have run across these kinds of situations before.)

– WAH
May 28 at 11:55





Hi Red-Cloud, thank you very much for extending your answer. The new suggestion is better because it's now a single equation block. But I still don't see how to get the vertical alignment without fine tuning if the LHS changes in a non-trivial way. For example, suppose I wanted the LHS to become $thereforeGamma$? (I recognize that this is a bit contrived, but I have run across these kinds of situations before.)

– WAH
May 28 at 11:55



















draft saved

draft discarded



















































Thanks for contributing an answer to TeX - LaTeX Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f492997%2fvertical-alignment-every-other-line-and-wide-expressions%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown









Popular posts from this blog

He _____ here since 1970 . Answer needed [closed]What does “since he was so high” mean?Meaning of “catch birds for”?How do I ensure “since” takes the meaning I want?“Who cares here” meaningWhat does “right round toward” mean?the time tense (had now been detected)What does the phrase “ring around the roses” mean here?Correct usage of “visited upon”Meaning of “foiled rail sabotage bid”It was the third time I had gone to Rome or It is the third time I had been to Rome

Bunad

Færeyskur hestur Heimild | Tengill | Tilvísanir | LeiðsagnarvalRossið - síða um færeyska hrossið á færeyskuGott ár hjá færeyska hestinum