Adjective for a “expected” or “aspirational” version of a document?Synonym for “final” or antonym for “draft”A word to describe “work that is ready to be done”Word for “release candidate” of draft documentBetter than expected as an adjective?Disambiguating 'dataset' in an overloaded contextNoun for “Things that can be improved/might change their state”Adjective for “something that took more resources than expected”Single Word for “Expected Disappointment”Word for “smaller version of”How to indicate that verification/correction is requested in the document

How can "mimic phobia" be cured or prevented?

Is XSS in canonical link possible?

Does a 'pending' US visa application constitute a denial?

Bob has never been a M before

Can the Supreme Court overturn an impeachment?

Can somebody explain Brexit in a few child-proof sentences?

Engineer refusing to file/disclose patents

Count the occurrence of each unique word in the file

How much character growth crosses the line into breaking the character

Can we have a perfect cadence in a minor key?

Journal losing indexing services

How do I nest cases?

Melting point of aspirin, contradicting sources

Can I use my Chinese passport to enter China after I acquired another citizenship?

Is '大勢の人' redundant?

Can someone explain how this makes sense electrically?

Open problems concerning all the finite groups

THT: What is a squared annular “ring”?

A social experiment. What is the worst that can happen?

How can I check how many times an iPhone or iPad has been charged?

Interest Rate Futures Question from Hull, 8e

Open a doc from terminal, but not by its name

Have I saved too much for retirement so far?

Is there a conventional notation or name for the slip angle?



Adjective for a “expected” or “aspirational” version of a document?


Synonym for “final” or antonym for “draft”A word to describe “work that is ready to be done”Word for “release candidate” of draft documentBetter than expected as an adjective?Disambiguating 'dataset' in an overloaded contextNoun for “Things that can be improved/might change their state”Adjective for “something that took more resources than expected”Single Word for “Expected Disappointment”Word for “smaller version of”How to indicate that verification/correction is requested in the document













0















We're creating a user manual for a software application. Like the manual, the application itself is a work in progress.



We have a version of the manual that describes the application as we expect it to be when completed. It could change over time, as the application is modified, but it's mostly stable.



If "draft" (or "draft version") is the term for the current, pre-publication version of user manual, and "final version" is what you'd call what is ultimately published, what's the adjective for the initial version?



"Expected version" isn't quite right, and "Aspirational" sounds pompous. "Target" might work, except that our tools use that term for something else and I don't want the confusion.










share|improve this question






















  • You could call it the "premature" version.

    – TRomano
    Feb 18 at 20:54






  • 1





    I would call it preliminary version.

    – michael.hor257k
    Feb 18 at 22:52











  • Yes, preliminary is almost universal.

    – Global Charm
    Feb 19 at 1:35











  • Your software should have a version number X, and the manual is for version X. Whatever adjective you use will be context sensitive--it won't be preliminary or a draft once you release, but all your old documentation and emails will still read that way.

    – jimm101
    Feb 19 at 13:44















0















We're creating a user manual for a software application. Like the manual, the application itself is a work in progress.



We have a version of the manual that describes the application as we expect it to be when completed. It could change over time, as the application is modified, but it's mostly stable.



If "draft" (or "draft version") is the term for the current, pre-publication version of user manual, and "final version" is what you'd call what is ultimately published, what's the adjective for the initial version?



"Expected version" isn't quite right, and "Aspirational" sounds pompous. "Target" might work, except that our tools use that term for something else and I don't want the confusion.










share|improve this question






















  • You could call it the "premature" version.

    – TRomano
    Feb 18 at 20:54






  • 1





    I would call it preliminary version.

    – michael.hor257k
    Feb 18 at 22:52











  • Yes, preliminary is almost universal.

    – Global Charm
    Feb 19 at 1:35











  • Your software should have a version number X, and the manual is for version X. Whatever adjective you use will be context sensitive--it won't be preliminary or a draft once you release, but all your old documentation and emails will still read that way.

    – jimm101
    Feb 19 at 13:44













0












0








0








We're creating a user manual for a software application. Like the manual, the application itself is a work in progress.



We have a version of the manual that describes the application as we expect it to be when completed. It could change over time, as the application is modified, but it's mostly stable.



If "draft" (or "draft version") is the term for the current, pre-publication version of user manual, and "final version" is what you'd call what is ultimately published, what's the adjective for the initial version?



"Expected version" isn't quite right, and "Aspirational" sounds pompous. "Target" might work, except that our tools use that term for something else and I don't want the confusion.










share|improve this question














We're creating a user manual for a software application. Like the manual, the application itself is a work in progress.



We have a version of the manual that describes the application as we expect it to be when completed. It could change over time, as the application is modified, but it's mostly stable.



If "draft" (or "draft version") is the term for the current, pre-publication version of user manual, and "final version" is what you'd call what is ultimately published, what's the adjective for the initial version?



"Expected version" isn't quite right, and "Aspirational" sounds pompous. "Target" might work, except that our tools use that term for something else and I don't want the confusion.







single-word-requests tech-writing






share|improve this question













share|improve this question











share|improve this question




share|improve this question










asked Feb 18 at 20:32









Shawn V. WilsonShawn V. Wilson

1143




1143












  • You could call it the "premature" version.

    – TRomano
    Feb 18 at 20:54






  • 1





    I would call it preliminary version.

    – michael.hor257k
    Feb 18 at 22:52











  • Yes, preliminary is almost universal.

    – Global Charm
    Feb 19 at 1:35











  • Your software should have a version number X, and the manual is for version X. Whatever adjective you use will be context sensitive--it won't be preliminary or a draft once you release, but all your old documentation and emails will still read that way.

    – jimm101
    Feb 19 at 13:44

















  • You could call it the "premature" version.

    – TRomano
    Feb 18 at 20:54






  • 1





    I would call it preliminary version.

    – michael.hor257k
    Feb 18 at 22:52











  • Yes, preliminary is almost universal.

    – Global Charm
    Feb 19 at 1:35











  • Your software should have a version number X, and the manual is for version X. Whatever adjective you use will be context sensitive--it won't be preliminary or a draft once you release, but all your old documentation and emails will still read that way.

    – jimm101
    Feb 19 at 13:44
















You could call it the "premature" version.

– TRomano
Feb 18 at 20:54





You could call it the "premature" version.

– TRomano
Feb 18 at 20:54




1




1





I would call it preliminary version.

– michael.hor257k
Feb 18 at 22:52





I would call it preliminary version.

– michael.hor257k
Feb 18 at 22:52













Yes, preliminary is almost universal.

– Global Charm
Feb 19 at 1:35





Yes, preliminary is almost universal.

– Global Charm
Feb 19 at 1:35













Your software should have a version number X, and the manual is for version X. Whatever adjective you use will be context sensitive--it won't be preliminary or a draft once you release, but all your old documentation and emails will still read that way.

– jimm101
Feb 19 at 13:44





Your software should have a version number X, and the manual is for version X. Whatever adjective you use will be context sensitive--it won't be preliminary or a draft once you release, but all your old documentation and emails will still read that way.

– jimm101
Feb 19 at 13:44










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















0














Draft, working version, work in progress ('WIP') each convey the temporary nature of the document. I can't find any dictionary authority for 'working version' but it does show up in web searches with this meaning.






share|improve this answer























  • Those are the words I'm using for the version we're actively writing, which will culminate in a final draft. This other one is sort of a target, and will only change if the developers make some modification in the application

    – Shawn V. Wilson
    Feb 19 at 6:27


















0














In software terms, it sounds like you're working on something that's out of beta and essentially complete—but still pending any last-minute changes prior to publication.



This is often described as a release candidate.



From PC Magazine's definition of release candidate:




A pre-release version of software. Sometimes software vendors make one or two release candidates (RC1, RC2, etc.) available to select customers in advance of the official release. A release candidate is like a "sneak preview" of the final release with the added advantage that serious bugs may yet surface and be fixed before the general public uses it. Thus, there are alpha versions (internal), beta versions (external), release candidates (sometimes) and the final release of software. After that, there are countless updates that add features and fix bugs.





In editing terminology, a manuscript that has had its final round of technical input and copyediting is, as you've called it, a final draft:




[Merriam-Webster]



: a final version of something (such as a document) usually after a lot of editing and rewriting

// The final draft is due tomorrow.




However, what you're currently working on is something prior to that stage—and certainly prior to the even more complete stage of proof or galley proof (which, in the publishing world, is what a final drafte turns into when it's sent to a typesetter).



In general editing terms, a draft that comes before a final draft is simply a manuscript.



I know of no editing terminology that is the exact equivalent of release candidate, but that is the analogous term that you're looking for.




Note that you asked for the initial version in your question—but also said that you want something that's the expected or target version. Those two things seem incompatible to me. But if it's not actually release candidate that describes your current situation, then you could make use of either alpha or beta, depending on how you are interpreting things. Or even initial draft. But, again, you seem to be describing things at two different ends of the development cycle at the same time, so I'm not certain. A target version is also known as a prototype or proposal.






share|improve this answer

























  • They are incompatible; I probably shouldn't have said "initial" when speaking of the "target" version. (I called it that because it was written first). But I think "proposal" is probably closest.

    – Shawn V. Wilson
    Feb 19 at 23:39










Your Answer








StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "97"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);

else
createEditor();

);

function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);



);













draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fenglish.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f486117%2fadjective-for-a-expected-or-aspirational-version-of-a-document%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes








2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









0














Draft, working version, work in progress ('WIP') each convey the temporary nature of the document. I can't find any dictionary authority for 'working version' but it does show up in web searches with this meaning.






share|improve this answer























  • Those are the words I'm using for the version we're actively writing, which will culminate in a final draft. This other one is sort of a target, and will only change if the developers make some modification in the application

    – Shawn V. Wilson
    Feb 19 at 6:27















0














Draft, working version, work in progress ('WIP') each convey the temporary nature of the document. I can't find any dictionary authority for 'working version' but it does show up in web searches with this meaning.






share|improve this answer























  • Those are the words I'm using for the version we're actively writing, which will culminate in a final draft. This other one is sort of a target, and will only change if the developers make some modification in the application

    – Shawn V. Wilson
    Feb 19 at 6:27













0












0








0







Draft, working version, work in progress ('WIP') each convey the temporary nature of the document. I can't find any dictionary authority for 'working version' but it does show up in web searches with this meaning.






share|improve this answer













Draft, working version, work in progress ('WIP') each convey the temporary nature of the document. I can't find any dictionary authority for 'working version' but it does show up in web searches with this meaning.







share|improve this answer












share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer










answered Feb 18 at 22:18









Jim MackJim Mack

7,06721832




7,06721832












  • Those are the words I'm using for the version we're actively writing, which will culminate in a final draft. This other one is sort of a target, and will only change if the developers make some modification in the application

    – Shawn V. Wilson
    Feb 19 at 6:27

















  • Those are the words I'm using for the version we're actively writing, which will culminate in a final draft. This other one is sort of a target, and will only change if the developers make some modification in the application

    – Shawn V. Wilson
    Feb 19 at 6:27
















Those are the words I'm using for the version we're actively writing, which will culminate in a final draft. This other one is sort of a target, and will only change if the developers make some modification in the application

– Shawn V. Wilson
Feb 19 at 6:27





Those are the words I'm using for the version we're actively writing, which will culminate in a final draft. This other one is sort of a target, and will only change if the developers make some modification in the application

– Shawn V. Wilson
Feb 19 at 6:27













0














In software terms, it sounds like you're working on something that's out of beta and essentially complete—but still pending any last-minute changes prior to publication.



This is often described as a release candidate.



From PC Magazine's definition of release candidate:




A pre-release version of software. Sometimes software vendors make one or two release candidates (RC1, RC2, etc.) available to select customers in advance of the official release. A release candidate is like a "sneak preview" of the final release with the added advantage that serious bugs may yet surface and be fixed before the general public uses it. Thus, there are alpha versions (internal), beta versions (external), release candidates (sometimes) and the final release of software. After that, there are countless updates that add features and fix bugs.





In editing terminology, a manuscript that has had its final round of technical input and copyediting is, as you've called it, a final draft:




[Merriam-Webster]



: a final version of something (such as a document) usually after a lot of editing and rewriting

// The final draft is due tomorrow.




However, what you're currently working on is something prior to that stage—and certainly prior to the even more complete stage of proof or galley proof (which, in the publishing world, is what a final drafte turns into when it's sent to a typesetter).



In general editing terms, a draft that comes before a final draft is simply a manuscript.



I know of no editing terminology that is the exact equivalent of release candidate, but that is the analogous term that you're looking for.




Note that you asked for the initial version in your question—but also said that you want something that's the expected or target version. Those two things seem incompatible to me. But if it's not actually release candidate that describes your current situation, then you could make use of either alpha or beta, depending on how you are interpreting things. Or even initial draft. But, again, you seem to be describing things at two different ends of the development cycle at the same time, so I'm not certain. A target version is also known as a prototype or proposal.






share|improve this answer

























  • They are incompatible; I probably shouldn't have said "initial" when speaking of the "target" version. (I called it that because it was written first). But I think "proposal" is probably closest.

    – Shawn V. Wilson
    Feb 19 at 23:39















0














In software terms, it sounds like you're working on something that's out of beta and essentially complete—but still pending any last-minute changes prior to publication.



This is often described as a release candidate.



From PC Magazine's definition of release candidate:




A pre-release version of software. Sometimes software vendors make one or two release candidates (RC1, RC2, etc.) available to select customers in advance of the official release. A release candidate is like a "sneak preview" of the final release with the added advantage that serious bugs may yet surface and be fixed before the general public uses it. Thus, there are alpha versions (internal), beta versions (external), release candidates (sometimes) and the final release of software. After that, there are countless updates that add features and fix bugs.





In editing terminology, a manuscript that has had its final round of technical input and copyediting is, as you've called it, a final draft:




[Merriam-Webster]



: a final version of something (such as a document) usually after a lot of editing and rewriting

// The final draft is due tomorrow.




However, what you're currently working on is something prior to that stage—and certainly prior to the even more complete stage of proof or galley proof (which, in the publishing world, is what a final drafte turns into when it's sent to a typesetter).



In general editing terms, a draft that comes before a final draft is simply a manuscript.



I know of no editing terminology that is the exact equivalent of release candidate, but that is the analogous term that you're looking for.




Note that you asked for the initial version in your question—but also said that you want something that's the expected or target version. Those two things seem incompatible to me. But if it's not actually release candidate that describes your current situation, then you could make use of either alpha or beta, depending on how you are interpreting things. Or even initial draft. But, again, you seem to be describing things at two different ends of the development cycle at the same time, so I'm not certain. A target version is also known as a prototype or proposal.






share|improve this answer

























  • They are incompatible; I probably shouldn't have said "initial" when speaking of the "target" version. (I called it that because it was written first). But I think "proposal" is probably closest.

    – Shawn V. Wilson
    Feb 19 at 23:39













0












0








0







In software terms, it sounds like you're working on something that's out of beta and essentially complete—but still pending any last-minute changes prior to publication.



This is often described as a release candidate.



From PC Magazine's definition of release candidate:




A pre-release version of software. Sometimes software vendors make one or two release candidates (RC1, RC2, etc.) available to select customers in advance of the official release. A release candidate is like a "sneak preview" of the final release with the added advantage that serious bugs may yet surface and be fixed before the general public uses it. Thus, there are alpha versions (internal), beta versions (external), release candidates (sometimes) and the final release of software. After that, there are countless updates that add features and fix bugs.





In editing terminology, a manuscript that has had its final round of technical input and copyediting is, as you've called it, a final draft:




[Merriam-Webster]



: a final version of something (such as a document) usually after a lot of editing and rewriting

// The final draft is due tomorrow.




However, what you're currently working on is something prior to that stage—and certainly prior to the even more complete stage of proof or galley proof (which, in the publishing world, is what a final drafte turns into when it's sent to a typesetter).



In general editing terms, a draft that comes before a final draft is simply a manuscript.



I know of no editing terminology that is the exact equivalent of release candidate, but that is the analogous term that you're looking for.




Note that you asked for the initial version in your question—but also said that you want something that's the expected or target version. Those two things seem incompatible to me. But if it's not actually release candidate that describes your current situation, then you could make use of either alpha or beta, depending on how you are interpreting things. Or even initial draft. But, again, you seem to be describing things at two different ends of the development cycle at the same time, so I'm not certain. A target version is also known as a prototype or proposal.






share|improve this answer















In software terms, it sounds like you're working on something that's out of beta and essentially complete—but still pending any last-minute changes prior to publication.



This is often described as a release candidate.



From PC Magazine's definition of release candidate:




A pre-release version of software. Sometimes software vendors make one or two release candidates (RC1, RC2, etc.) available to select customers in advance of the official release. A release candidate is like a "sneak preview" of the final release with the added advantage that serious bugs may yet surface and be fixed before the general public uses it. Thus, there are alpha versions (internal), beta versions (external), release candidates (sometimes) and the final release of software. After that, there are countless updates that add features and fix bugs.





In editing terminology, a manuscript that has had its final round of technical input and copyediting is, as you've called it, a final draft:




[Merriam-Webster]



: a final version of something (such as a document) usually after a lot of editing and rewriting

// The final draft is due tomorrow.




However, what you're currently working on is something prior to that stage—and certainly prior to the even more complete stage of proof or galley proof (which, in the publishing world, is what a final drafte turns into when it's sent to a typesetter).



In general editing terms, a draft that comes before a final draft is simply a manuscript.



I know of no editing terminology that is the exact equivalent of release candidate, but that is the analogous term that you're looking for.




Note that you asked for the initial version in your question—but also said that you want something that's the expected or target version. Those two things seem incompatible to me. But if it's not actually release candidate that describes your current situation, then you could make use of either alpha or beta, depending on how you are interpreting things. Or even initial draft. But, again, you seem to be describing things at two different ends of the development cycle at the same time, so I'm not certain. A target version is also known as a prototype or proposal.







share|improve this answer














share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer








edited Feb 19 at 7:18

























answered Feb 19 at 7:10









Jason BassfordJason Bassford

19.1k32245




19.1k32245












  • They are incompatible; I probably shouldn't have said "initial" when speaking of the "target" version. (I called it that because it was written first). But I think "proposal" is probably closest.

    – Shawn V. Wilson
    Feb 19 at 23:39

















  • They are incompatible; I probably shouldn't have said "initial" when speaking of the "target" version. (I called it that because it was written first). But I think "proposal" is probably closest.

    – Shawn V. Wilson
    Feb 19 at 23:39
















They are incompatible; I probably shouldn't have said "initial" when speaking of the "target" version. (I called it that because it was written first). But I think "proposal" is probably closest.

– Shawn V. Wilson
Feb 19 at 23:39





They are incompatible; I probably shouldn't have said "initial" when speaking of the "target" version. (I called it that because it was written first). But I think "proposal" is probably closest.

– Shawn V. Wilson
Feb 19 at 23:39

















draft saved

draft discarded
















































Thanks for contributing an answer to English Language & Usage Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid


  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fenglish.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f486117%2fadjective-for-a-expected-or-aspirational-version-of-a-document%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Færeyskur hestur Heimild | Tengill | Tilvísanir | LeiðsagnarvalRossið - síða um færeyska hrossið á færeyskuGott ár hjá færeyska hestinum

He _____ here since 1970 . Answer needed [closed]What does “since he was so high” mean?Meaning of “catch birds for”?How do I ensure “since” takes the meaning I want?“Who cares here” meaningWhat does “right round toward” mean?the time tense (had now been detected)What does the phrase “ring around the roses” mean here?Correct usage of “visited upon”Meaning of “foiled rail sabotage bid”It was the third time I had gone to Rome or It is the third time I had been to Rome

Slayer Innehåll Historia | Stil, komposition och lyrik | Bandets betydelse och framgångar | Sidoprojekt och samarbeten | Kontroverser | Medlemmar | Utmärkelser och nomineringar | Turnéer och festivaler | Diskografi | Referenser | Externa länkar | Navigeringsmenywww.slayer.net”Metal Massacre vol. 1””Metal Massacre vol. 3””Metal Massacre Volume III””Show No Mercy””Haunting the Chapel””Live Undead””Hell Awaits””Reign in Blood””Reign in Blood””Gold & Platinum – Reign in Blood””Golden Gods Awards Winners”originalet”Kerrang! Hall Of Fame””Slayer Looks Back On 37-Year Career In New Video Series: Part Two””South of Heaven””Gold & Platinum – South of Heaven””Seasons in the Abyss””Gold & Platinum - Seasons in the Abyss””Divine Intervention””Divine Intervention - Release group by Slayer””Gold & Platinum - Divine Intervention””Live Intrusion””Undisputed Attitude””Abolish Government/Superficial Love””Release “Slatanic Slaughter: A Tribute to Slayer” by Various Artists””Diabolus in Musica””Soundtrack to the Apocalypse””God Hates Us All””Systematic - Relationships””War at the Warfield””Gold & Platinum - War at the Warfield””Soundtrack to the Apocalypse””Gold & Platinum - Still Reigning””Metallica, Slayer, Iron Mauden Among Winners At Metal Hammer Awards””Eternal Pyre””Eternal Pyre - Slayer release group””Eternal Pyre””Metal Storm Awards 2006””Kerrang! Hall Of Fame””Slayer Wins 'Best Metal' Grammy Award””Slayer Guitarist Jeff Hanneman Dies””Bullet-For My Valentine booed at Metal Hammer Golden Gods Awards””Unholy Aliance””The End Of Slayer?””Slayer: We Could Thrash Out Two More Albums If We're Fast Enough...””'The Unholy Alliance: Chapter III' UK Dates Added”originalet”Megadeth And Slayer To Co-Headline 'Canadian Carnage' Trek”originalet”World Painted Blood””Release “World Painted Blood” by Slayer””Metallica Heading To Cinemas””Slayer, Megadeth To Join Forces For 'European Carnage' Tour - Dec. 18, 2010”originalet”Slayer's Hanneman Contracts Acute Infection; Band To Bring In Guest Guitarist””Cannibal Corpse's Pat O'Brien Will Step In As Slayer's Guest Guitarist”originalet”Slayer’s Jeff Hanneman Dead at 49””Dave Lombardo Says He Made Only $67,000 In 2011 While Touring With Slayer””Slayer: We Do Not Agree With Dave Lombardo's Substance Or Timeline Of Events””Slayer Welcomes Drummer Paul Bostaph Back To The Fold””Slayer Hope to Unveil Never-Before-Heard Jeff Hanneman Material on Next Album””Slayer Debut New Song 'Implode' During Surprise Golden Gods Appearance””Release group Repentless by Slayer””Repentless - Slayer - Credits””Slayer””Metal Storm Awards 2015””Slayer - to release comic book "Repentless #1"””Slayer To Release 'Repentless' 6.66" Vinyl Box Set””BREAKING NEWS: Slayer Announce Farewell Tour””Slayer Recruit Lamb of God, Anthrax, Behemoth + Testament for Final Tour””Slayer lägger ner efter 37 år””Slayer Announces Second North American Leg Of 'Final' Tour””Final World Tour””Slayer Announces Final European Tour With Lamb of God, Anthrax And Obituary””Slayer To Tour Europe With Lamb of God, Anthrax And Obituary””Slayer To Play 'Last French Show Ever' At Next Year's Hellfst””Slayer's Final World Tour Will Extend Into 2019””Death Angel's Rob Cavestany On Slayer's 'Farewell' Tour: 'Some Of Us Could See This Coming'””Testament Has No Plans To Retire Anytime Soon, Says Chuck Billy””Anthrax's Scott Ian On Slayer's 'Farewell' Tour Plans: 'I Was Surprised And I Wasn't Surprised'””Slayer””Slayer's Morbid Schlock””Review/Rock; For Slayer, the Mania Is the Message””Slayer - Biography””Slayer - Reign In Blood”originalet”Dave Lombardo””An exclusive oral history of Slayer”originalet”Exclusive! Interview With Slayer Guitarist Jeff Hanneman”originalet”Thinking Out Loud: Slayer's Kerry King on hair metal, Satan and being polite””Slayer Lyrics””Slayer - Biography””Most influential artists for extreme metal music””Slayer - Reign in Blood””Slayer guitarist Jeff Hanneman dies aged 49””Slatanic Slaughter: A Tribute to Slayer””Gateway to Hell: A Tribute to Slayer””Covered In Blood””Slayer: The Origins of Thrash in San Francisco, CA.””Why They Rule - #6 Slayer”originalet”Guitar World's 100 Greatest Heavy Metal Guitarists Of All Time”originalet”The fans have spoken: Slayer comes out on top in readers' polls”originalet”Tribute to Jeff Hanneman (1964-2013)””Lamb Of God Frontman: We Sound Like A Slayer Rip-Off””BEHEMOTH Frontman Pays Tribute To SLAYER's JEFF HANNEMAN””Slayer, Hatebreed Doing Double Duty On This Year's Ozzfest””System of a Down””Lacuna Coil’s Andrea Ferro Talks Influences, Skateboarding, Band Origins + More””Slayer - Reign in Blood””Into The Lungs of Hell””Slayer rules - en utställning om fans””Slayer and Their Fans Slashed Through a No-Holds-Barred Night at Gas Monkey””Home””Slayer””Gold & Platinum - The Big 4 Live from Sofia, Bulgaria””Exclusive! Interview With Slayer Guitarist Kerry King””2008-02-23: Wiltern, Los Angeles, CA, USA””Slayer's Kerry King To Perform With Megadeth Tonight! - Oct. 21, 2010”originalet”Dave Lombardo - Biography”Slayer Case DismissedArkiveradUltimate Classic Rock: Slayer guitarist Jeff Hanneman dead at 49.”Slayer: "We could never do any thing like Some Kind Of Monster..."””Cannibal Corpse'S Pat O'Brien Will Step In As Slayer'S Guest Guitarist | The Official Slayer Site”originalet”Slayer Wins 'Best Metal' Grammy Award””Slayer Guitarist Jeff Hanneman Dies””Kerrang! Awards 2006 Blog: Kerrang! Hall Of Fame””Kerrang! Awards 2013: Kerrang! Legend”originalet”Metallica, Slayer, Iron Maien Among Winners At Metal Hammer Awards””Metal Hammer Golden Gods Awards””Bullet For My Valentine Booed At Metal Hammer Golden Gods Awards””Metal Storm Awards 2006””Metal Storm Awards 2015””Slayer's Concert History””Slayer - Relationships””Slayer - Releases”Slayers officiella webbplatsSlayer på MusicBrainzOfficiell webbplatsSlayerSlayerr1373445760000 0001 1540 47353068615-5086262726cb13906545x(data)6033143kn20030215029