Is “consecutive” a subset of “sequential”?

Is '大勢の人' redundant?

Can not upgrade Kali,not enough space in /var/cache/apt/archives

Melting point of aspirin, contradicting sources

Open a doc from terminal, but not by its name

Is there a conventional notation or name for the slip angle?

How much character growth crosses the line into breaking the character

Is a file system driver implemented using a kernel module in Linux?

Can I use my Chinese passport to enter China after I acquired another citizenship?

Database accidentally deleted with a bash script

Joining ~ 40 normalized tables for 200 columns to display detailed user profile. Can this be optimized?

We have a love-hate relationship

Do varchar(max), nvarchar(max) and varbinary(max) columns affect select queries?

Create all possible words using a set or letters

Should I stop contributing to retirement accounts?

Schmidt decomposition - example

Why is it that I can sometimes guess the next note?

Can someone explain how this makes sense electrically?

Python script not running correctly when launched with crontab

How should I respond when I lied about my education and the company finds out through background check?

Is camera lens focus an exact point or a range?

How do I repair my stair bannister?

What is the gram­mat­i­cal term for “‑ed” words like these?

Is it possible to have a strip of cold climate in the middle of a planet?

Can we have a perfect cadence in a minor key?



Is “consecutive” a subset of “sequential”?














1















Going straight to the dictionary, we can see that:



Consecutive means: something following something else without interruption.



Some examples:



  1. He did 100 consecutive push-ups (1, 2, 3, ..., 99, 100)



  2. He scored 3 consecutive goals (meaning that a player scored 3 goals without any other team-mate scoring in between)



    2.1 Ronaldo scored in min. 25, 50, 75. He scored 3 consecutive goals. Had somebody else from his team scored anywhere between 25-75 his goals wouldn't have been consecutive.



  3. He had to take his medicine for 14 consecutive days (2 weeks straight, without interruption).


Sequential means: following a particular order.



The above doesn't mean without interruption though. It just has to follow a predictable pattern.



Some examples:



  1. Computer instructions are always executed sequentially, the order being top-down as they are encountered in the program.


  2. The Fibonacci sequence: 1, 2, 3, 5, 8, 13, 21, ... is a sequence where each number is the sum of the preceding two numbers.


  3. I described the events sequentially, but in reverse order, starting with the conclusion.


  4. We were given a list of sequential numbers comprising even multiples of 10. (20, 60, 100, say every 4 multiples)


  5. He was used as a defender every 5 games for 6 sequential World Cups (this is a case where you might substitute sequential with consecutive but it's also correct to interpret this as say every 2 World Cups, or every 3 World Cups is it not?). Without knowing further information this is ambiguous just like biweekly which can mean both every 2 weeks and twice a week.


  6. They were using a sequence of numbers comprising multiples of five. Note that this can also be interpreted as consecutive since it doesn't specify any further details about the multiples.


So all in all I've seen folks using these 2 terms interchangeably. While this might be true it's not always the case. They can be used interchangeably when the elements that they're describing are immediately following one after another but not otherwise.



Is the above correct or did I misunderstand anything?










share|improve this question









New contributor




George is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
























    1















    Going straight to the dictionary, we can see that:



    Consecutive means: something following something else without interruption.



    Some examples:



    1. He did 100 consecutive push-ups (1, 2, 3, ..., 99, 100)



    2. He scored 3 consecutive goals (meaning that a player scored 3 goals without any other team-mate scoring in between)



      2.1 Ronaldo scored in min. 25, 50, 75. He scored 3 consecutive goals. Had somebody else from his team scored anywhere between 25-75 his goals wouldn't have been consecutive.



    3. He had to take his medicine for 14 consecutive days (2 weeks straight, without interruption).


    Sequential means: following a particular order.



    The above doesn't mean without interruption though. It just has to follow a predictable pattern.



    Some examples:



    1. Computer instructions are always executed sequentially, the order being top-down as they are encountered in the program.


    2. The Fibonacci sequence: 1, 2, 3, 5, 8, 13, 21, ... is a sequence where each number is the sum of the preceding two numbers.


    3. I described the events sequentially, but in reverse order, starting with the conclusion.


    4. We were given a list of sequential numbers comprising even multiples of 10. (20, 60, 100, say every 4 multiples)


    5. He was used as a defender every 5 games for 6 sequential World Cups (this is a case where you might substitute sequential with consecutive but it's also correct to interpret this as say every 2 World Cups, or every 3 World Cups is it not?). Without knowing further information this is ambiguous just like biweekly which can mean both every 2 weeks and twice a week.


    6. They were using a sequence of numbers comprising multiples of five. Note that this can also be interpreted as consecutive since it doesn't specify any further details about the multiples.


    So all in all I've seen folks using these 2 terms interchangeably. While this might be true it's not always the case. They can be used interchangeably when the elements that they're describing are immediately following one after another but not otherwise.



    Is the above correct or did I misunderstand anything?










    share|improve this question









    New contributor




    George is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
    Check out our Code of Conduct.






















      1












      1








      1








      Going straight to the dictionary, we can see that:



      Consecutive means: something following something else without interruption.



      Some examples:



      1. He did 100 consecutive push-ups (1, 2, 3, ..., 99, 100)



      2. He scored 3 consecutive goals (meaning that a player scored 3 goals without any other team-mate scoring in between)



        2.1 Ronaldo scored in min. 25, 50, 75. He scored 3 consecutive goals. Had somebody else from his team scored anywhere between 25-75 his goals wouldn't have been consecutive.



      3. He had to take his medicine for 14 consecutive days (2 weeks straight, without interruption).


      Sequential means: following a particular order.



      The above doesn't mean without interruption though. It just has to follow a predictable pattern.



      Some examples:



      1. Computer instructions are always executed sequentially, the order being top-down as they are encountered in the program.


      2. The Fibonacci sequence: 1, 2, 3, 5, 8, 13, 21, ... is a sequence where each number is the sum of the preceding two numbers.


      3. I described the events sequentially, but in reverse order, starting with the conclusion.


      4. We were given a list of sequential numbers comprising even multiples of 10. (20, 60, 100, say every 4 multiples)


      5. He was used as a defender every 5 games for 6 sequential World Cups (this is a case where you might substitute sequential with consecutive but it's also correct to interpret this as say every 2 World Cups, or every 3 World Cups is it not?). Without knowing further information this is ambiguous just like biweekly which can mean both every 2 weeks and twice a week.


      6. They were using a sequence of numbers comprising multiples of five. Note that this can also be interpreted as consecutive since it doesn't specify any further details about the multiples.


      So all in all I've seen folks using these 2 terms interchangeably. While this might be true it's not always the case. They can be used interchangeably when the elements that they're describing are immediately following one after another but not otherwise.



      Is the above correct or did I misunderstand anything?










      share|improve this question









      New contributor




      George is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.












      Going straight to the dictionary, we can see that:



      Consecutive means: something following something else without interruption.



      Some examples:



      1. He did 100 consecutive push-ups (1, 2, 3, ..., 99, 100)



      2. He scored 3 consecutive goals (meaning that a player scored 3 goals without any other team-mate scoring in between)



        2.1 Ronaldo scored in min. 25, 50, 75. He scored 3 consecutive goals. Had somebody else from his team scored anywhere between 25-75 his goals wouldn't have been consecutive.



      3. He had to take his medicine for 14 consecutive days (2 weeks straight, without interruption).


      Sequential means: following a particular order.



      The above doesn't mean without interruption though. It just has to follow a predictable pattern.



      Some examples:



      1. Computer instructions are always executed sequentially, the order being top-down as they are encountered in the program.


      2. The Fibonacci sequence: 1, 2, 3, 5, 8, 13, 21, ... is a sequence where each number is the sum of the preceding two numbers.


      3. I described the events sequentially, but in reverse order, starting with the conclusion.


      4. We were given a list of sequential numbers comprising even multiples of 10. (20, 60, 100, say every 4 multiples)


      5. He was used as a defender every 5 games for 6 sequential World Cups (this is a case where you might substitute sequential with consecutive but it's also correct to interpret this as say every 2 World Cups, or every 3 World Cups is it not?). Without knowing further information this is ambiguous just like biweekly which can mean both every 2 weeks and twice a week.


      6. They were using a sequence of numbers comprising multiples of five. Note that this can also be interpreted as consecutive since it doesn't specify any further details about the multiples.


      So all in all I've seen folks using these 2 terms interchangeably. While this might be true it's not always the case. They can be used interchangeably when the elements that they're describing are immediately following one after another but not otherwise.



      Is the above correct or did I misunderstand anything?







      semantics






      share|improve this question









      New contributor




      George is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.











      share|improve this question









      New contributor




      George is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.









      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question








      edited Mar 19 at 5:22







      George













      New contributor




      George is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.









      asked Mar 18 at 20:32









      GeorgeGeorge

      84




      84




      New contributor




      George is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.





      New contributor





      George is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.






      George is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.




















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          1














          OP's understanding of the words 'sequential' and 'consecutive' is correct, but the question "Is “consecutive” a subset of “sequential”?" is a little too mathematical in construction. Ordinary word definitions don't follow mathematical concepts like that. It's probably true that in most cases something that is consecutive is also sequential, but that doesn't really explain word usage. Describing something as "sequential" puts on focus on the fact that what is being described is done in some particular order, as opposed to doing things out-of-order or simultaneously. No one would use the word "sequential" to distinguish between consecutive and non-consecutive.



          "Consecutive", on the other hand, puts the focus on the fact that there is no interruption. In shorthand, to describe something as "sequential" you mean to focus on the order; to describe something as "consecutive" you mean to focus on the lack of interruption.



          As for the examples, I would say that #5 for "sequential"—"He was used as a defender every 5 games for 6 sequential World Cups"—is not a particularly felicitous use of the word. I agree that "consecutive" would make more sense here—you wouldn't use the word "sequential" without further explanation if you meant something exotic like the suggestion of every 2 or 3 World Cups. If that scenario was meant, then it would have to be explicitly mentioned. The fact that such a scenario could be described as "sequential" is not sufficient to use the word without further explanation.



          The only other thing to consider is that sequential doesn't even necessarily mean monotonic. If you said that the sequence was "5 1 3 2 99" then following that sequence is no more or less sequential than, say, skipping every 2.






          share|improve this answer






















            Your Answer








            StackExchange.ready(function()
            var channelOptions =
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "97"
            ;
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
            createEditor();
            );

            else
            createEditor();

            );

            function createEditor()
            StackExchange.prepareEditor(
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
            convertImagesToLinks: false,
            noModals: true,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: null,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            imageUploader:
            brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
            contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
            allowUrls: true
            ,
            noCode: true, onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            );



            );






            George is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.









            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fenglish.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f490293%2fis-consecutive-a-subset-of-sequential%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown

























            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes








            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes









            1














            OP's understanding of the words 'sequential' and 'consecutive' is correct, but the question "Is “consecutive” a subset of “sequential”?" is a little too mathematical in construction. Ordinary word definitions don't follow mathematical concepts like that. It's probably true that in most cases something that is consecutive is also sequential, but that doesn't really explain word usage. Describing something as "sequential" puts on focus on the fact that what is being described is done in some particular order, as opposed to doing things out-of-order or simultaneously. No one would use the word "sequential" to distinguish between consecutive and non-consecutive.



            "Consecutive", on the other hand, puts the focus on the fact that there is no interruption. In shorthand, to describe something as "sequential" you mean to focus on the order; to describe something as "consecutive" you mean to focus on the lack of interruption.



            As for the examples, I would say that #5 for "sequential"—"He was used as a defender every 5 games for 6 sequential World Cups"—is not a particularly felicitous use of the word. I agree that "consecutive" would make more sense here—you wouldn't use the word "sequential" without further explanation if you meant something exotic like the suggestion of every 2 or 3 World Cups. If that scenario was meant, then it would have to be explicitly mentioned. The fact that such a scenario could be described as "sequential" is not sufficient to use the word without further explanation.



            The only other thing to consider is that sequential doesn't even necessarily mean monotonic. If you said that the sequence was "5 1 3 2 99" then following that sequence is no more or less sequential than, say, skipping every 2.






            share|improve this answer



























              1














              OP's understanding of the words 'sequential' and 'consecutive' is correct, but the question "Is “consecutive” a subset of “sequential”?" is a little too mathematical in construction. Ordinary word definitions don't follow mathematical concepts like that. It's probably true that in most cases something that is consecutive is also sequential, but that doesn't really explain word usage. Describing something as "sequential" puts on focus on the fact that what is being described is done in some particular order, as opposed to doing things out-of-order or simultaneously. No one would use the word "sequential" to distinguish between consecutive and non-consecutive.



              "Consecutive", on the other hand, puts the focus on the fact that there is no interruption. In shorthand, to describe something as "sequential" you mean to focus on the order; to describe something as "consecutive" you mean to focus on the lack of interruption.



              As for the examples, I would say that #5 for "sequential"—"He was used as a defender every 5 games for 6 sequential World Cups"—is not a particularly felicitous use of the word. I agree that "consecutive" would make more sense here—you wouldn't use the word "sequential" without further explanation if you meant something exotic like the suggestion of every 2 or 3 World Cups. If that scenario was meant, then it would have to be explicitly mentioned. The fact that such a scenario could be described as "sequential" is not sufficient to use the word without further explanation.



              The only other thing to consider is that sequential doesn't even necessarily mean monotonic. If you said that the sequence was "5 1 3 2 99" then following that sequence is no more or less sequential than, say, skipping every 2.






              share|improve this answer

























                1












                1








                1







                OP's understanding of the words 'sequential' and 'consecutive' is correct, but the question "Is “consecutive” a subset of “sequential”?" is a little too mathematical in construction. Ordinary word definitions don't follow mathematical concepts like that. It's probably true that in most cases something that is consecutive is also sequential, but that doesn't really explain word usage. Describing something as "sequential" puts on focus on the fact that what is being described is done in some particular order, as opposed to doing things out-of-order or simultaneously. No one would use the word "sequential" to distinguish between consecutive and non-consecutive.



                "Consecutive", on the other hand, puts the focus on the fact that there is no interruption. In shorthand, to describe something as "sequential" you mean to focus on the order; to describe something as "consecutive" you mean to focus on the lack of interruption.



                As for the examples, I would say that #5 for "sequential"—"He was used as a defender every 5 games for 6 sequential World Cups"—is not a particularly felicitous use of the word. I agree that "consecutive" would make more sense here—you wouldn't use the word "sequential" without further explanation if you meant something exotic like the suggestion of every 2 or 3 World Cups. If that scenario was meant, then it would have to be explicitly mentioned. The fact that such a scenario could be described as "sequential" is not sufficient to use the word without further explanation.



                The only other thing to consider is that sequential doesn't even necessarily mean monotonic. If you said that the sequence was "5 1 3 2 99" then following that sequence is no more or less sequential than, say, skipping every 2.






                share|improve this answer













                OP's understanding of the words 'sequential' and 'consecutive' is correct, but the question "Is “consecutive” a subset of “sequential”?" is a little too mathematical in construction. Ordinary word definitions don't follow mathematical concepts like that. It's probably true that in most cases something that is consecutive is also sequential, but that doesn't really explain word usage. Describing something as "sequential" puts on focus on the fact that what is being described is done in some particular order, as opposed to doing things out-of-order or simultaneously. No one would use the word "sequential" to distinguish between consecutive and non-consecutive.



                "Consecutive", on the other hand, puts the focus on the fact that there is no interruption. In shorthand, to describe something as "sequential" you mean to focus on the order; to describe something as "consecutive" you mean to focus on the lack of interruption.



                As for the examples, I would say that #5 for "sequential"—"He was used as a defender every 5 games for 6 sequential World Cups"—is not a particularly felicitous use of the word. I agree that "consecutive" would make more sense here—you wouldn't use the word "sequential" without further explanation if you meant something exotic like the suggestion of every 2 or 3 World Cups. If that scenario was meant, then it would have to be explicitly mentioned. The fact that such a scenario could be described as "sequential" is not sufficient to use the word without further explanation.



                The only other thing to consider is that sequential doesn't even necessarily mean monotonic. If you said that the sequence was "5 1 3 2 99" then following that sequence is no more or less sequential than, say, skipping every 2.







                share|improve this answer












                share|improve this answer



                share|improve this answer










                answered Mar 18 at 23:34









                nohatnohat

                60.8k12171238




                60.8k12171238




















                    George is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.









                    draft saved

                    draft discarded


















                    George is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.












                    George is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.











                    George is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.














                    Thanks for contributing an answer to English Language & Usage Stack Exchange!


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid


                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function ()
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fenglish.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f490293%2fis-consecutive-a-subset-of-sequential%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                    );

                    Post as a guest















                    Required, but never shown





















































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown

































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown







                    Popular posts from this blog

                    Færeyskur hestur Heimild | Tengill | Tilvísanir | LeiðsagnarvalRossið - síða um færeyska hrossið á færeyskuGott ár hjá færeyska hestinum

                    He _____ here since 1970 . Answer needed [closed]What does “since he was so high” mean?Meaning of “catch birds for”?How do I ensure “since” takes the meaning I want?“Who cares here” meaningWhat does “right round toward” mean?the time tense (had now been detected)What does the phrase “ring around the roses” mean here?Correct usage of “visited upon”Meaning of “foiled rail sabotage bid”It was the third time I had gone to Rome or It is the third time I had been to Rome

                    Slayer Innehåll Historia | Stil, komposition och lyrik | Bandets betydelse och framgångar | Sidoprojekt och samarbeten | Kontroverser | Medlemmar | Utmärkelser och nomineringar | Turnéer och festivaler | Diskografi | Referenser | Externa länkar | Navigeringsmenywww.slayer.net”Metal Massacre vol. 1””Metal Massacre vol. 3””Metal Massacre Volume III””Show No Mercy””Haunting the Chapel””Live Undead””Hell Awaits””Reign in Blood””Reign in Blood””Gold & Platinum – Reign in Blood””Golden Gods Awards Winners”originalet”Kerrang! Hall Of Fame””Slayer Looks Back On 37-Year Career In New Video Series: Part Two””South of Heaven””Gold & Platinum – South of Heaven””Seasons in the Abyss””Gold & Platinum - Seasons in the Abyss””Divine Intervention””Divine Intervention - Release group by Slayer””Gold & Platinum - Divine Intervention””Live Intrusion””Undisputed Attitude””Abolish Government/Superficial Love””Release “Slatanic Slaughter: A Tribute to Slayer” by Various Artists””Diabolus in Musica””Soundtrack to the Apocalypse””God Hates Us All””Systematic - Relationships””War at the Warfield””Gold & Platinum - War at the Warfield””Soundtrack to the Apocalypse””Gold & Platinum - Still Reigning””Metallica, Slayer, Iron Mauden Among Winners At Metal Hammer Awards””Eternal Pyre””Eternal Pyre - Slayer release group””Eternal Pyre””Metal Storm Awards 2006””Kerrang! Hall Of Fame””Slayer Wins 'Best Metal' Grammy Award””Slayer Guitarist Jeff Hanneman Dies””Bullet-For My Valentine booed at Metal Hammer Golden Gods Awards””Unholy Aliance””The End Of Slayer?””Slayer: We Could Thrash Out Two More Albums If We're Fast Enough...””'The Unholy Alliance: Chapter III' UK Dates Added”originalet”Megadeth And Slayer To Co-Headline 'Canadian Carnage' Trek”originalet”World Painted Blood””Release “World Painted Blood” by Slayer””Metallica Heading To Cinemas””Slayer, Megadeth To Join Forces For 'European Carnage' Tour - Dec. 18, 2010”originalet”Slayer's Hanneman Contracts Acute Infection; Band To Bring In Guest Guitarist””Cannibal Corpse's Pat O'Brien Will Step In As Slayer's Guest Guitarist”originalet”Slayer’s Jeff Hanneman Dead at 49””Dave Lombardo Says He Made Only $67,000 In 2011 While Touring With Slayer””Slayer: We Do Not Agree With Dave Lombardo's Substance Or Timeline Of Events””Slayer Welcomes Drummer Paul Bostaph Back To The Fold””Slayer Hope to Unveil Never-Before-Heard Jeff Hanneman Material on Next Album””Slayer Debut New Song 'Implode' During Surprise Golden Gods Appearance””Release group Repentless by Slayer””Repentless - Slayer - Credits””Slayer””Metal Storm Awards 2015””Slayer - to release comic book "Repentless #1"””Slayer To Release 'Repentless' 6.66" Vinyl Box Set””BREAKING NEWS: Slayer Announce Farewell Tour””Slayer Recruit Lamb of God, Anthrax, Behemoth + Testament for Final Tour””Slayer lägger ner efter 37 år””Slayer Announces Second North American Leg Of 'Final' Tour””Final World Tour””Slayer Announces Final European Tour With Lamb of God, Anthrax And Obituary””Slayer To Tour Europe With Lamb of God, Anthrax And Obituary””Slayer To Play 'Last French Show Ever' At Next Year's Hellfst””Slayer's Final World Tour Will Extend Into 2019””Death Angel's Rob Cavestany On Slayer's 'Farewell' Tour: 'Some Of Us Could See This Coming'””Testament Has No Plans To Retire Anytime Soon, Says Chuck Billy””Anthrax's Scott Ian On Slayer's 'Farewell' Tour Plans: 'I Was Surprised And I Wasn't Surprised'””Slayer””Slayer's Morbid Schlock””Review/Rock; For Slayer, the Mania Is the Message””Slayer - Biography””Slayer - Reign In Blood”originalet”Dave Lombardo””An exclusive oral history of Slayer”originalet”Exclusive! Interview With Slayer Guitarist Jeff Hanneman”originalet”Thinking Out Loud: Slayer's Kerry King on hair metal, Satan and being polite””Slayer Lyrics””Slayer - Biography””Most influential artists for extreme metal music””Slayer - Reign in Blood””Slayer guitarist Jeff Hanneman dies aged 49””Slatanic Slaughter: A Tribute to Slayer””Gateway to Hell: A Tribute to Slayer””Covered In Blood””Slayer: The Origins of Thrash in San Francisco, CA.””Why They Rule - #6 Slayer”originalet”Guitar World's 100 Greatest Heavy Metal Guitarists Of All Time”originalet”The fans have spoken: Slayer comes out on top in readers' polls”originalet”Tribute to Jeff Hanneman (1964-2013)””Lamb Of God Frontman: We Sound Like A Slayer Rip-Off””BEHEMOTH Frontman Pays Tribute To SLAYER's JEFF HANNEMAN””Slayer, Hatebreed Doing Double Duty On This Year's Ozzfest””System of a Down””Lacuna Coil’s Andrea Ferro Talks Influences, Skateboarding, Band Origins + More””Slayer - Reign in Blood””Into The Lungs of Hell””Slayer rules - en utställning om fans””Slayer and Their Fans Slashed Through a No-Holds-Barred Night at Gas Monkey””Home””Slayer””Gold & Platinum - The Big 4 Live from Sofia, Bulgaria””Exclusive! Interview With Slayer Guitarist Kerry King””2008-02-23: Wiltern, Los Angeles, CA, USA””Slayer's Kerry King To Perform With Megadeth Tonight! - Oct. 21, 2010”originalet”Dave Lombardo - Biography”Slayer Case DismissedArkiveradUltimate Classic Rock: Slayer guitarist Jeff Hanneman dead at 49.”Slayer: "We could never do any thing like Some Kind Of Monster..."””Cannibal Corpse'S Pat O'Brien Will Step In As Slayer'S Guest Guitarist | The Official Slayer Site”originalet”Slayer Wins 'Best Metal' Grammy Award””Slayer Guitarist Jeff Hanneman Dies””Kerrang! Awards 2006 Blog: Kerrang! Hall Of Fame””Kerrang! Awards 2013: Kerrang! Legend”originalet”Metallica, Slayer, Iron Maien Among Winners At Metal Hammer Awards””Metal Hammer Golden Gods Awards””Bullet For My Valentine Booed At Metal Hammer Golden Gods Awards””Metal Storm Awards 2006””Metal Storm Awards 2015””Slayer's Concert History””Slayer - Relationships””Slayer - Releases”Slayers officiella webbplatsSlayer på MusicBrainzOfficiell webbplatsSlayerSlayerr1373445760000 0001 1540 47353068615-5086262726cb13906545x(data)6033143kn20030215029