Personal or impersonal in a technical resumeWhat's the best practice for displaying a personal website url in a resume?Write a resume objective that expresses my desire to hone and sharpen my skillsResume Preamble: Sounds wrongHow do I rewrite the following for a resume?What content parts should a technical (IT) CV have?Can I use an abbreviated two-digit format for year in a resume?Need recommendation re: online resume formatHow would I give a reference of my YouTube channel in the Resume?Writing accomplishments on a resumeHow can I avoid using I repetitively in a resume/about me?
On a tidally locked planet, would time be quantized?
How to set Output path correctly for a Single Image render?
Do Legal Documents Require Signing In Standard Pen Colors?
Indicating multiple different modes of speech (fantasy language or telepathy)
Reply 'no position' while the job posting is still there
How can I check how many times an iPhone or iPad has been charged?
Filling the middle of a torus in Tikz
Query about absorption line spectra
Folder comparison
Is XSS in canonical link possible?
Diode in opposite direction?
Is a model fitted to data or is data fitted to a model?
Can I use my Chinese passport to enter China after I acquired another citizenship?
How to decide convergence of Integrals
Could the E-bike drivetrain wear down till needing replacement after 400 km?
How does the reference system of the Majjhima Nikaya work?
Fuse symbol on toroidal transformer
Why we can't differentiate a polynomial equation as many times as we wish?
Customize circled numbers
What major Native American tribes were around Santa Fe during the late 1850s?
Flux received by a negative charge
Will adding a BY-SA image to a blog post make the entire post BY-SA?
Difference between -| and |- in TikZ
Some numbers are more equivalent than others
Personal or impersonal in a technical resume
What's the best practice for displaying a personal website url in a resume?Write a resume objective that expresses my desire to hone and sharpen my skillsResume Preamble: Sounds wrongHow do I rewrite the following for a resume?What content parts should a technical (IT) CV have?Can I use an abbreviated two-digit format for year in a resume?Need recommendation re: online resume formatHow would I give a reference of my YouTube channel in the Resume?Writing accomplishments on a resumeHow can I avoid using I repetitively in a resume/about me?
In CVs or on Linkedin profiles there are often spaces dedicated to past experience.
In those sections, one is supposed to describe what work he/she did and what skills he/she acquired on previous workplaces/projects.
In this context, is it better to describe the experience in a personal or impersonal way?
A personal way (e.g. first person) underlines the subjects:
Project X
While assigned to Project X, I've learned how to mix dangerous chemical ingredients in a cauldron to bring out their hidden potential. Eventually, along with my team, we pushed further the research on superhuman abilities.
An impersonal way, to my understanding, underlines the skills acquired:
Project X
Manufacturing and treating of dangerous chemical ingredients. Testing of superhuman abilities in a controlled environment. Eating of snacks in the down times.
technical-writing resume
|
show 1 more comment
In CVs or on Linkedin profiles there are often spaces dedicated to past experience.
In those sections, one is supposed to describe what work he/she did and what skills he/she acquired on previous workplaces/projects.
In this context, is it better to describe the experience in a personal or impersonal way?
A personal way (e.g. first person) underlines the subjects:
Project X
While assigned to Project X, I've learned how to mix dangerous chemical ingredients in a cauldron to bring out their hidden potential. Eventually, along with my team, we pushed further the research on superhuman abilities.
An impersonal way, to my understanding, underlines the skills acquired:
Project X
Manufacturing and treating of dangerous chemical ingredients. Testing of superhuman abilities in a controlled environment. Eating of snacks in the down times.
technical-writing resume
2
with unemployment at 3.8%.. you can go with EITHER approach ...
– ashleylee
Mar 20 at 17:14
3
the key thing problem these days isn't getting offers.... but getting a good salary.
– ashleylee
Mar 20 at 17:20
The "personal" one is sooo much better.
– Cyn
Mar 20 at 22:56
1
@Cyn to be fair, I'd like to work in the superhuman abilities field.
– Liquid
Mar 20 at 23:09
1
Depends where the resume is going. Most resumes are (initially) read by software, not humans. One advantage of b) is it's 30% more concise (36% if you remove the superfluous "of"s and "in downtime").
– smci
Mar 21 at 0:29
|
show 1 more comment
In CVs or on Linkedin profiles there are often spaces dedicated to past experience.
In those sections, one is supposed to describe what work he/she did and what skills he/she acquired on previous workplaces/projects.
In this context, is it better to describe the experience in a personal or impersonal way?
A personal way (e.g. first person) underlines the subjects:
Project X
While assigned to Project X, I've learned how to mix dangerous chemical ingredients in a cauldron to bring out their hidden potential. Eventually, along with my team, we pushed further the research on superhuman abilities.
An impersonal way, to my understanding, underlines the skills acquired:
Project X
Manufacturing and treating of dangerous chemical ingredients. Testing of superhuman abilities in a controlled environment. Eating of snacks in the down times.
technical-writing resume
In CVs or on Linkedin profiles there are often spaces dedicated to past experience.
In those sections, one is supposed to describe what work he/she did and what skills he/she acquired on previous workplaces/projects.
In this context, is it better to describe the experience in a personal or impersonal way?
A personal way (e.g. first person) underlines the subjects:
Project X
While assigned to Project X, I've learned how to mix dangerous chemical ingredients in a cauldron to bring out their hidden potential. Eventually, along with my team, we pushed further the research on superhuman abilities.
An impersonal way, to my understanding, underlines the skills acquired:
Project X
Manufacturing and treating of dangerous chemical ingredients. Testing of superhuman abilities in a controlled environment. Eating of snacks in the down times.
technical-writing resume
technical-writing resume
asked Mar 20 at 15:55
LiquidLiquid
7,96121867
7,96121867
2
with unemployment at 3.8%.. you can go with EITHER approach ...
– ashleylee
Mar 20 at 17:14
3
the key thing problem these days isn't getting offers.... but getting a good salary.
– ashleylee
Mar 20 at 17:20
The "personal" one is sooo much better.
– Cyn
Mar 20 at 22:56
1
@Cyn to be fair, I'd like to work in the superhuman abilities field.
– Liquid
Mar 20 at 23:09
1
Depends where the resume is going. Most resumes are (initially) read by software, not humans. One advantage of b) is it's 30% more concise (36% if you remove the superfluous "of"s and "in downtime").
– smci
Mar 21 at 0:29
|
show 1 more comment
2
with unemployment at 3.8%.. you can go with EITHER approach ...
– ashleylee
Mar 20 at 17:14
3
the key thing problem these days isn't getting offers.... but getting a good salary.
– ashleylee
Mar 20 at 17:20
The "personal" one is sooo much better.
– Cyn
Mar 20 at 22:56
1
@Cyn to be fair, I'd like to work in the superhuman abilities field.
– Liquid
Mar 20 at 23:09
1
Depends where the resume is going. Most resumes are (initially) read by software, not humans. One advantage of b) is it's 30% more concise (36% if you remove the superfluous "of"s and "in downtime").
– smci
Mar 21 at 0:29
2
2
with unemployment at 3.8%.. you can go with EITHER approach ...
– ashleylee
Mar 20 at 17:14
with unemployment at 3.8%.. you can go with EITHER approach ...
– ashleylee
Mar 20 at 17:14
3
3
the key thing problem these days isn't getting offers.... but getting a good salary.
– ashleylee
Mar 20 at 17:20
the key thing problem these days isn't getting offers.... but getting a good salary.
– ashleylee
Mar 20 at 17:20
The "personal" one is sooo much better.
– Cyn
Mar 20 at 22:56
The "personal" one is sooo much better.
– Cyn
Mar 20 at 22:56
1
1
@Cyn to be fair, I'd like to work in the superhuman abilities field.
– Liquid
Mar 20 at 23:09
@Cyn to be fair, I'd like to work in the superhuman abilities field.
– Liquid
Mar 20 at 23:09
1
1
Depends where the resume is going. Most resumes are (initially) read by software, not humans. One advantage of b) is it's 30% more concise (36% if you remove the superfluous "of"s and "in downtime").
– smci
Mar 21 at 0:29
Depends where the resume is going. Most resumes are (initially) read by software, not humans. One advantage of b) is it's 30% more concise (36% if you remove the superfluous "of"s and "in downtime").
– smci
Mar 21 at 0:29
|
show 1 more comment
4 Answers
4
active
oldest
votes
While I get the feeling this might get deemed "opinion based" I've reviewed a few hundred technical CVs in my time (for my sins) so here goes nothing!
Personal
Use of "I.." or "My role.." type statements a) humanize you so the person reading the CV can see you as a human being rather than just the CV and b) they tie the achievements to you. Impersonal does emphasize the skills but that's what a Skills section is for. When describing the experience you want to emphasize the person getting that experience (i.e. the person whose CV it is).
PS: If you ever want a friendly eye casting over your CV there's usually someone in Workplace SE chat who'll take a look for you.
add a comment |
I would skip the poetry, but use the personal approach.
Project X
I had several duties on this project. My primary responsibility was mixing dangerous chemicals in a cauldron for various experiments, including an attempt to liquefy kryptonite. In my second year on this project, I joined a team devising new procedures for testing the limits of Spiderman's strength, and how far Batman can throw a Batarang. We also attempted to test the upper limit of how much marijuana Snoop Dogg can smoke, however, due to experimental design errors, we failed to find a definitive limit.
I have read many resumes; and I find this "formal personal" approach the easiest to read.
add a comment |
The personal style has one big advantage, especially for people who are a bit shy about "selling themselves".
If your sentences start with "I", they are (by definition) about what you actually did.
In the impersonal style, it's easy to slip into describing what your team, or your employer, did (e.g. they made $$$$ selling this wonderful world-leading product that was developed while you worked there), but missing out on what you personally contributed to that success story - and your personal contribution is the only thing that readers of your CV are interested in.
In the OP's examples, the "impersonal" version doesn't actually say anything about what the OP. For all the reader knows, he/she just cleaned the office floor once a week - and someone processing a stack of job applicants, who only has an hour to scan through 50 such CV's isn't going to see anything there that grabs his/her attention.
(If you think processing 50 or even 100 CVs in a hour "isn't fair" on the applicants - well, life isn't fair, and that's often what happens.)
add a comment |
A common convention is to use the personal approach but skip most first-person pronouns to avoid repeating them too much:
- Determined how to mix dangerous chemical ingredients in a cauldron to bring out their hidden potential.
- Pushed further the research on superhuman abilities.
Too many “I”s is unpleasantly repetitive and can sound vain.
Going out of your way to avoid using pronouns makes the text harder to read and bit vague in tone about whether you were the one doing these things.
– Ville Niemi
Mar 21 at 1:18
@VilleNiemi Depends on how exactly it’s organized. If it’s bullet points, then not starting each one with “I” is certainly the way to go. If it’s a short text, a different approach could make sense. Either way a possibility of having too many “I”s is something to keep in mind.
– Roman Odaisky
Mar 21 at 1:35
Yeah, I could see it working with bullet point. And you are absolutely correct about avoiding too many of any word in a fairly condensed text. Your answer just doesn't make those valid points clear IMO. Maybe edit your comment into the answer?
– Ville Niemi
Mar 21 at 1:42
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "166"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fwriting.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f43820%2fpersonal-or-impersonal-in-a-technical-resume%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
4 Answers
4
active
oldest
votes
4 Answers
4
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
While I get the feeling this might get deemed "opinion based" I've reviewed a few hundred technical CVs in my time (for my sins) so here goes nothing!
Personal
Use of "I.." or "My role.." type statements a) humanize you so the person reading the CV can see you as a human being rather than just the CV and b) they tie the achievements to you. Impersonal does emphasize the skills but that's what a Skills section is for. When describing the experience you want to emphasize the person getting that experience (i.e. the person whose CV it is).
PS: If you ever want a friendly eye casting over your CV there's usually someone in Workplace SE chat who'll take a look for you.
add a comment |
While I get the feeling this might get deemed "opinion based" I've reviewed a few hundred technical CVs in my time (for my sins) so here goes nothing!
Personal
Use of "I.." or "My role.." type statements a) humanize you so the person reading the CV can see you as a human being rather than just the CV and b) they tie the achievements to you. Impersonal does emphasize the skills but that's what a Skills section is for. When describing the experience you want to emphasize the person getting that experience (i.e. the person whose CV it is).
PS: If you ever want a friendly eye casting over your CV there's usually someone in Workplace SE chat who'll take a look for you.
add a comment |
While I get the feeling this might get deemed "opinion based" I've reviewed a few hundred technical CVs in my time (for my sins) so here goes nothing!
Personal
Use of "I.." or "My role.." type statements a) humanize you so the person reading the CV can see you as a human being rather than just the CV and b) they tie the achievements to you. Impersonal does emphasize the skills but that's what a Skills section is for. When describing the experience you want to emphasize the person getting that experience (i.e. the person whose CV it is).
PS: If you ever want a friendly eye casting over your CV there's usually someone in Workplace SE chat who'll take a look for you.
While I get the feeling this might get deemed "opinion based" I've reviewed a few hundred technical CVs in my time (for my sins) so here goes nothing!
Personal
Use of "I.." or "My role.." type statements a) humanize you so the person reading the CV can see you as a human being rather than just the CV and b) they tie the achievements to you. Impersonal does emphasize the skills but that's what a Skills section is for. When describing the experience you want to emphasize the person getting that experience (i.e. the person whose CV it is).
PS: If you ever want a friendly eye casting over your CV there's usually someone in Workplace SE chat who'll take a look for you.
answered Mar 20 at 16:07
motosubatsumotosubatsu
1,236115
1,236115
add a comment |
add a comment |
I would skip the poetry, but use the personal approach.
Project X
I had several duties on this project. My primary responsibility was mixing dangerous chemicals in a cauldron for various experiments, including an attempt to liquefy kryptonite. In my second year on this project, I joined a team devising new procedures for testing the limits of Spiderman's strength, and how far Batman can throw a Batarang. We also attempted to test the upper limit of how much marijuana Snoop Dogg can smoke, however, due to experimental design errors, we failed to find a definitive limit.
I have read many resumes; and I find this "formal personal" approach the easiest to read.
add a comment |
I would skip the poetry, but use the personal approach.
Project X
I had several duties on this project. My primary responsibility was mixing dangerous chemicals in a cauldron for various experiments, including an attempt to liquefy kryptonite. In my second year on this project, I joined a team devising new procedures for testing the limits of Spiderman's strength, and how far Batman can throw a Batarang. We also attempted to test the upper limit of how much marijuana Snoop Dogg can smoke, however, due to experimental design errors, we failed to find a definitive limit.
I have read many resumes; and I find this "formal personal" approach the easiest to read.
add a comment |
I would skip the poetry, but use the personal approach.
Project X
I had several duties on this project. My primary responsibility was mixing dangerous chemicals in a cauldron for various experiments, including an attempt to liquefy kryptonite. In my second year on this project, I joined a team devising new procedures for testing the limits of Spiderman's strength, and how far Batman can throw a Batarang. We also attempted to test the upper limit of how much marijuana Snoop Dogg can smoke, however, due to experimental design errors, we failed to find a definitive limit.
I have read many resumes; and I find this "formal personal" approach the easiest to read.
I would skip the poetry, but use the personal approach.
Project X
I had several duties on this project. My primary responsibility was mixing dangerous chemicals in a cauldron for various experiments, including an attempt to liquefy kryptonite. In my second year on this project, I joined a team devising new procedures for testing the limits of Spiderman's strength, and how far Batman can throw a Batarang. We also attempted to test the upper limit of how much marijuana Snoop Dogg can smoke, however, due to experimental design errors, we failed to find a definitive limit.
I have read many resumes; and I find this "formal personal" approach the easiest to read.
answered Mar 20 at 16:07
AmadeusAmadeus
56.1k572183
56.1k572183
add a comment |
add a comment |
The personal style has one big advantage, especially for people who are a bit shy about "selling themselves".
If your sentences start with "I", they are (by definition) about what you actually did.
In the impersonal style, it's easy to slip into describing what your team, or your employer, did (e.g. they made $$$$ selling this wonderful world-leading product that was developed while you worked there), but missing out on what you personally contributed to that success story - and your personal contribution is the only thing that readers of your CV are interested in.
In the OP's examples, the "impersonal" version doesn't actually say anything about what the OP. For all the reader knows, he/she just cleaned the office floor once a week - and someone processing a stack of job applicants, who only has an hour to scan through 50 such CV's isn't going to see anything there that grabs his/her attention.
(If you think processing 50 or even 100 CVs in a hour "isn't fair" on the applicants - well, life isn't fair, and that's often what happens.)
add a comment |
The personal style has one big advantage, especially for people who are a bit shy about "selling themselves".
If your sentences start with "I", they are (by definition) about what you actually did.
In the impersonal style, it's easy to slip into describing what your team, or your employer, did (e.g. they made $$$$ selling this wonderful world-leading product that was developed while you worked there), but missing out on what you personally contributed to that success story - and your personal contribution is the only thing that readers of your CV are interested in.
In the OP's examples, the "impersonal" version doesn't actually say anything about what the OP. For all the reader knows, he/she just cleaned the office floor once a week - and someone processing a stack of job applicants, who only has an hour to scan through 50 such CV's isn't going to see anything there that grabs his/her attention.
(If you think processing 50 or even 100 CVs in a hour "isn't fair" on the applicants - well, life isn't fair, and that's often what happens.)
add a comment |
The personal style has one big advantage, especially for people who are a bit shy about "selling themselves".
If your sentences start with "I", they are (by definition) about what you actually did.
In the impersonal style, it's easy to slip into describing what your team, or your employer, did (e.g. they made $$$$ selling this wonderful world-leading product that was developed while you worked there), but missing out on what you personally contributed to that success story - and your personal contribution is the only thing that readers of your CV are interested in.
In the OP's examples, the "impersonal" version doesn't actually say anything about what the OP. For all the reader knows, he/she just cleaned the office floor once a week - and someone processing a stack of job applicants, who only has an hour to scan through 50 such CV's isn't going to see anything there that grabs his/her attention.
(If you think processing 50 or even 100 CVs in a hour "isn't fair" on the applicants - well, life isn't fair, and that's often what happens.)
The personal style has one big advantage, especially for people who are a bit shy about "selling themselves".
If your sentences start with "I", they are (by definition) about what you actually did.
In the impersonal style, it's easy to slip into describing what your team, or your employer, did (e.g. they made $$$$ selling this wonderful world-leading product that was developed while you worked there), but missing out on what you personally contributed to that success story - and your personal contribution is the only thing that readers of your CV are interested in.
In the OP's examples, the "impersonal" version doesn't actually say anything about what the OP. For all the reader knows, he/she just cleaned the office floor once a week - and someone processing a stack of job applicants, who only has an hour to scan through 50 such CV's isn't going to see anything there that grabs his/her attention.
(If you think processing 50 or even 100 CVs in a hour "isn't fair" on the applicants - well, life isn't fair, and that's often what happens.)
edited Mar 20 at 23:56
answered Mar 20 at 23:50
alephzeroalephzero
2212
2212
add a comment |
add a comment |
A common convention is to use the personal approach but skip most first-person pronouns to avoid repeating them too much:
- Determined how to mix dangerous chemical ingredients in a cauldron to bring out their hidden potential.
- Pushed further the research on superhuman abilities.
Too many “I”s is unpleasantly repetitive and can sound vain.
Going out of your way to avoid using pronouns makes the text harder to read and bit vague in tone about whether you were the one doing these things.
– Ville Niemi
Mar 21 at 1:18
@VilleNiemi Depends on how exactly it’s organized. If it’s bullet points, then not starting each one with “I” is certainly the way to go. If it’s a short text, a different approach could make sense. Either way a possibility of having too many “I”s is something to keep in mind.
– Roman Odaisky
Mar 21 at 1:35
Yeah, I could see it working with bullet point. And you are absolutely correct about avoiding too many of any word in a fairly condensed text. Your answer just doesn't make those valid points clear IMO. Maybe edit your comment into the answer?
– Ville Niemi
Mar 21 at 1:42
add a comment |
A common convention is to use the personal approach but skip most first-person pronouns to avoid repeating them too much:
- Determined how to mix dangerous chemical ingredients in a cauldron to bring out their hidden potential.
- Pushed further the research on superhuman abilities.
Too many “I”s is unpleasantly repetitive and can sound vain.
Going out of your way to avoid using pronouns makes the text harder to read and bit vague in tone about whether you were the one doing these things.
– Ville Niemi
Mar 21 at 1:18
@VilleNiemi Depends on how exactly it’s organized. If it’s bullet points, then not starting each one with “I” is certainly the way to go. If it’s a short text, a different approach could make sense. Either way a possibility of having too many “I”s is something to keep in mind.
– Roman Odaisky
Mar 21 at 1:35
Yeah, I could see it working with bullet point. And you are absolutely correct about avoiding too many of any word in a fairly condensed text. Your answer just doesn't make those valid points clear IMO. Maybe edit your comment into the answer?
– Ville Niemi
Mar 21 at 1:42
add a comment |
A common convention is to use the personal approach but skip most first-person pronouns to avoid repeating them too much:
- Determined how to mix dangerous chemical ingredients in a cauldron to bring out their hidden potential.
- Pushed further the research on superhuman abilities.
Too many “I”s is unpleasantly repetitive and can sound vain.
A common convention is to use the personal approach but skip most first-person pronouns to avoid repeating them too much:
- Determined how to mix dangerous chemical ingredients in a cauldron to bring out their hidden potential.
- Pushed further the research on superhuman abilities.
Too many “I”s is unpleasantly repetitive and can sound vain.
edited Mar 21 at 13:25
answered Mar 21 at 1:02
Roman OdaiskyRoman Odaisky
1493
1493
Going out of your way to avoid using pronouns makes the text harder to read and bit vague in tone about whether you were the one doing these things.
– Ville Niemi
Mar 21 at 1:18
@VilleNiemi Depends on how exactly it’s organized. If it’s bullet points, then not starting each one with “I” is certainly the way to go. If it’s a short text, a different approach could make sense. Either way a possibility of having too many “I”s is something to keep in mind.
– Roman Odaisky
Mar 21 at 1:35
Yeah, I could see it working with bullet point. And you are absolutely correct about avoiding too many of any word in a fairly condensed text. Your answer just doesn't make those valid points clear IMO. Maybe edit your comment into the answer?
– Ville Niemi
Mar 21 at 1:42
add a comment |
Going out of your way to avoid using pronouns makes the text harder to read and bit vague in tone about whether you were the one doing these things.
– Ville Niemi
Mar 21 at 1:18
@VilleNiemi Depends on how exactly it’s organized. If it’s bullet points, then not starting each one with “I” is certainly the way to go. If it’s a short text, a different approach could make sense. Either way a possibility of having too many “I”s is something to keep in mind.
– Roman Odaisky
Mar 21 at 1:35
Yeah, I could see it working with bullet point. And you are absolutely correct about avoiding too many of any word in a fairly condensed text. Your answer just doesn't make those valid points clear IMO. Maybe edit your comment into the answer?
– Ville Niemi
Mar 21 at 1:42
Going out of your way to avoid using pronouns makes the text harder to read and bit vague in tone about whether you were the one doing these things.
– Ville Niemi
Mar 21 at 1:18
Going out of your way to avoid using pronouns makes the text harder to read and bit vague in tone about whether you were the one doing these things.
– Ville Niemi
Mar 21 at 1:18
@VilleNiemi Depends on how exactly it’s organized. If it’s bullet points, then not starting each one with “I” is certainly the way to go. If it’s a short text, a different approach could make sense. Either way a possibility of having too many “I”s is something to keep in mind.
– Roman Odaisky
Mar 21 at 1:35
@VilleNiemi Depends on how exactly it’s organized. If it’s bullet points, then not starting each one with “I” is certainly the way to go. If it’s a short text, a different approach could make sense. Either way a possibility of having too many “I”s is something to keep in mind.
– Roman Odaisky
Mar 21 at 1:35
Yeah, I could see it working with bullet point. And you are absolutely correct about avoiding too many of any word in a fairly condensed text. Your answer just doesn't make those valid points clear IMO. Maybe edit your comment into the answer?
– Ville Niemi
Mar 21 at 1:42
Yeah, I could see it working with bullet point. And you are absolutely correct about avoiding too many of any word in a fairly condensed text. Your answer just doesn't make those valid points clear IMO. Maybe edit your comment into the answer?
– Ville Niemi
Mar 21 at 1:42
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Writing Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fwriting.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f43820%2fpersonal-or-impersonal-in-a-technical-resume%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
2
with unemployment at 3.8%.. you can go with EITHER approach ...
– ashleylee
Mar 20 at 17:14
3
the key thing problem these days isn't getting offers.... but getting a good salary.
– ashleylee
Mar 20 at 17:20
The "personal" one is sooo much better.
– Cyn
Mar 20 at 22:56
1
@Cyn to be fair, I'd like to work in the superhuman abilities field.
– Liquid
Mar 20 at 23:09
1
Depends where the resume is going. Most resumes are (initially) read by software, not humans. One advantage of b) is it's 30% more concise (36% if you remove the superfluous "of"s and "in downtime").
– smci
Mar 21 at 0:29