Is it appropriate to omit an auxiliary verb in this case?Auxiliary verb and adverb orderingModal verb without auxiliary verbAuxiliary verbs'Have had,' auxiliary & main verbAdverb location according to auxiliary verbQuestion without auxiliary verbWhy is usage of auxiliary verb correct?Is it incorrect to use “belong” as an auxiliary verb?Verb Tenses and Auxiliary VerbsAuxiliary verb after interrogative
anything or something to eat
Fuse symbol on toroidal transformer
Query about absorption line spectra
Is camera lens focus an exact point or a range?
Can a significant change in incentives void an employment contract?
Can somebody explain Brexit in a few child-proof sentences?
Did US corporations pay demonstrators in the German demonstrations against article 13?
Is Asuka Langley-Soryu disgusted by Shinji?
Proving a function is onto where f(x)=|x|.
Some numbers are more equivalent than others
Question about alert, surprise, and crit failing
Did arcade monitors have same pixel aspect ratio as TV sets?
Drawing ramified coverings with tikz
Global amount of publications over time
THT: What is a squared annular “ring”?
How much character growth crosses the line into breaking the character
Hot bath for aluminium engine block and heads
What is the difference between "Do you interest" and "...interested in" something?
Is it possible to have a strip of cold climate in the middle of a planet?
Can I sign legal documents with a smiley face?
How to decide convergence of Integrals
How can "mimic phobia" be cured or prevented?
Varistor? Purpose and principle
Engineer refusing to file/disclose patents
Is it appropriate to omit an auxiliary verb in this case?
Auxiliary verb and adverb orderingModal verb without auxiliary verbAuxiliary verbs'Have had,' auxiliary & main verbAdverb location according to auxiliary verbQuestion without auxiliary verbWhy is usage of auxiliary verb correct?Is it incorrect to use “belong” as an auxiliary verb?Verb Tenses and Auxiliary VerbsAuxiliary verb after interrogative
In the statement:
Exports are a virtue and imports are a vice
Would it be okay to omit the second "are"? Thus becoming:
Exports are a virtue and imports a vice
If it was grammatically incorrect, I wonder if it is still appropriate to omit the verb in a formal setting. I feel like the latter way of phrasing the sentence rolls off the tongue better.
auxiliary-verbs
add a comment |
In the statement:
Exports are a virtue and imports are a vice
Would it be okay to omit the second "are"? Thus becoming:
Exports are a virtue and imports a vice
If it was grammatically incorrect, I wonder if it is still appropriate to omit the verb in a formal setting. I feel like the latter way of phrasing the sentence rolls off the tongue better.
auxiliary-verbs
Actually, it's the main (linking or copulative) verb.
– Gustavson
Mar 19 at 9:53
1
"... if it is still appropriate to omit the verb in a formal setting" -- yes, and preferable. If still unconvinced, include a comma after imports for clarity. HTH.
– Kris
Mar 19 at 10:34
1
Yes, you can omit the auxiliary "are". But I much prefer to retain it, especially in formal contexts.
– BillJ
Mar 19 at 10:37
add a comment |
In the statement:
Exports are a virtue and imports are a vice
Would it be okay to omit the second "are"? Thus becoming:
Exports are a virtue and imports a vice
If it was grammatically incorrect, I wonder if it is still appropriate to omit the verb in a formal setting. I feel like the latter way of phrasing the sentence rolls off the tongue better.
auxiliary-verbs
In the statement:
Exports are a virtue and imports are a vice
Would it be okay to omit the second "are"? Thus becoming:
Exports are a virtue and imports a vice
If it was grammatically incorrect, I wonder if it is still appropriate to omit the verb in a formal setting. I feel like the latter way of phrasing the sentence rolls off the tongue better.
auxiliary-verbs
auxiliary-verbs
asked Mar 19 at 9:00
David TohDavid Toh
1573313
1573313
Actually, it's the main (linking or copulative) verb.
– Gustavson
Mar 19 at 9:53
1
"... if it is still appropriate to omit the verb in a formal setting" -- yes, and preferable. If still unconvinced, include a comma after imports for clarity. HTH.
– Kris
Mar 19 at 10:34
1
Yes, you can omit the auxiliary "are". But I much prefer to retain it, especially in formal contexts.
– BillJ
Mar 19 at 10:37
add a comment |
Actually, it's the main (linking or copulative) verb.
– Gustavson
Mar 19 at 9:53
1
"... if it is still appropriate to omit the verb in a formal setting" -- yes, and preferable. If still unconvinced, include a comma after imports for clarity. HTH.
– Kris
Mar 19 at 10:34
1
Yes, you can omit the auxiliary "are". But I much prefer to retain it, especially in formal contexts.
– BillJ
Mar 19 at 10:37
Actually, it's the main (linking or copulative) verb.
– Gustavson
Mar 19 at 9:53
Actually, it's the main (linking or copulative) verb.
– Gustavson
Mar 19 at 9:53
1
1
"... if it is still appropriate to omit the verb in a formal setting" -- yes, and preferable. If still unconvinced, include a comma after imports for clarity. HTH.
– Kris
Mar 19 at 10:34
"... if it is still appropriate to omit the verb in a formal setting" -- yes, and preferable. If still unconvinced, include a comma after imports for clarity. HTH.
– Kris
Mar 19 at 10:34
1
1
Yes, you can omit the auxiliary "are". But I much prefer to retain it, especially in formal contexts.
– BillJ
Mar 19 at 10:37
Yes, you can omit the auxiliary "are". But I much prefer to retain it, especially in formal contexts.
– BillJ
Mar 19 at 10:37
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
Yes. V-deletion is quite common, especially with conjunctive clauses.
Consider:
(1) I like milk and bread
(2) Someone will be happy and generous.
Closer to your example:
(3) My dog is a canine and my cat a feline.
That being said, since 'imports' is a verbal noun, it is best to retain the verb. The ambiguity of 'imports' - the ambiguity between a NP reading and a VP reading - makes parsing quite difficult. Syntactically, the issue is that 'imports' might be read as a present verb whose argument is the clause preceding the conjunction: 'exports (which are virtuous) import (x)'. So best keep the verb.
New contributor
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "97"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fenglish.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f490364%2fis-it-appropriate-to-omit-an-auxiliary-verb-in-this-case%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Yes. V-deletion is quite common, especially with conjunctive clauses.
Consider:
(1) I like milk and bread
(2) Someone will be happy and generous.
Closer to your example:
(3) My dog is a canine and my cat a feline.
That being said, since 'imports' is a verbal noun, it is best to retain the verb. The ambiguity of 'imports' - the ambiguity between a NP reading and a VP reading - makes parsing quite difficult. Syntactically, the issue is that 'imports' might be read as a present verb whose argument is the clause preceding the conjunction: 'exports (which are virtuous) import (x)'. So best keep the verb.
New contributor
add a comment |
Yes. V-deletion is quite common, especially with conjunctive clauses.
Consider:
(1) I like milk and bread
(2) Someone will be happy and generous.
Closer to your example:
(3) My dog is a canine and my cat a feline.
That being said, since 'imports' is a verbal noun, it is best to retain the verb. The ambiguity of 'imports' - the ambiguity between a NP reading and a VP reading - makes parsing quite difficult. Syntactically, the issue is that 'imports' might be read as a present verb whose argument is the clause preceding the conjunction: 'exports (which are virtuous) import (x)'. So best keep the verb.
New contributor
add a comment |
Yes. V-deletion is quite common, especially with conjunctive clauses.
Consider:
(1) I like milk and bread
(2) Someone will be happy and generous.
Closer to your example:
(3) My dog is a canine and my cat a feline.
That being said, since 'imports' is a verbal noun, it is best to retain the verb. The ambiguity of 'imports' - the ambiguity between a NP reading and a VP reading - makes parsing quite difficult. Syntactically, the issue is that 'imports' might be read as a present verb whose argument is the clause preceding the conjunction: 'exports (which are virtuous) import (x)'. So best keep the verb.
New contributor
Yes. V-deletion is quite common, especially with conjunctive clauses.
Consider:
(1) I like milk and bread
(2) Someone will be happy and generous.
Closer to your example:
(3) My dog is a canine and my cat a feline.
That being said, since 'imports' is a verbal noun, it is best to retain the verb. The ambiguity of 'imports' - the ambiguity between a NP reading and a VP reading - makes parsing quite difficult. Syntactically, the issue is that 'imports' might be read as a present verb whose argument is the clause preceding the conjunction: 'exports (which are virtuous) import (x)'. So best keep the verb.
New contributor
New contributor
answered Mar 20 at 2:51
Jeremiah CashoreJeremiah Cashore
71
71
New contributor
New contributor
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to English Language & Usage Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fenglish.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f490364%2fis-it-appropriate-to-omit-an-auxiliary-verb-in-this-case%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Actually, it's the main (linking or copulative) verb.
– Gustavson
Mar 19 at 9:53
1
"... if it is still appropriate to omit the verb in a formal setting" -- yes, and preferable. If still unconvinced, include a comma after imports for clarity. HTH.
– Kris
Mar 19 at 10:34
1
Yes, you can omit the auxiliary "are". But I much prefer to retain it, especially in formal contexts.
– BillJ
Mar 19 at 10:37