Is it appropriate to omit an auxiliary verb in this case?Auxiliary verb and adverb orderingModal verb without auxiliary verbAuxiliary verbs'Have had,' auxiliary & main verbAdverb location according to auxiliary verbQuestion without auxiliary verbWhy is usage of auxiliary verb correct?Is it incorrect to use “belong” as an auxiliary verb?Verb Tenses and Auxiliary VerbsAuxiliary verb after interrogative

anything or something to eat

Fuse symbol on toroidal transformer

Query about absorption line spectra

Is camera lens focus an exact point or a range?

Can a significant change in incentives void an employment contract?

Can somebody explain Brexit in a few child-proof sentences?

Did US corporations pay demonstrators in the German demonstrations against article 13?

Is Asuka Langley-Soryu disgusted by Shinji?

Proving a function is onto where f(x)=|x|.

Some numbers are more equivalent than others

Question about alert, surprise, and crit failing

Did arcade monitors have same pixel aspect ratio as TV sets?

Drawing ramified coverings with tikz

Global amount of publications over time

THT: What is a squared annular “ring”?

How much character growth crosses the line into breaking the character

Hot bath for aluminium engine block and heads

What is the difference between "Do you interest" and "...interested in" something?

Is it possible to have a strip of cold climate in the middle of a planet?

Can I sign legal documents with a smiley face?

How to decide convergence of Integrals

How can "mimic phobia" be cured or prevented?

Varistor? Purpose and principle

Engineer refusing to file/disclose patents



Is it appropriate to omit an auxiliary verb in this case?


Auxiliary verb and adverb orderingModal verb without auxiliary verbAuxiliary verbs'Have had,' auxiliary & main verbAdverb location according to auxiliary verbQuestion without auxiliary verbWhy is usage of auxiliary verb correct?Is it incorrect to use “belong” as an auxiliary verb?Verb Tenses and Auxiliary VerbsAuxiliary verb after interrogative













0















In the statement:




Exports are a virtue and imports are a vice




Would it be okay to omit the second "are"? Thus becoming:




Exports are a virtue and imports a vice




If it was grammatically incorrect, I wonder if it is still appropriate to omit the verb in a formal setting. I feel like the latter way of phrasing the sentence rolls off the tongue better.










share|improve this question






















  • Actually, it's the main (linking or copulative) verb.

    – Gustavson
    Mar 19 at 9:53






  • 1





    "... if it is still appropriate to omit the verb in a formal setting" -- yes, and preferable. If still unconvinced, include a comma after imports for clarity. HTH.

    – Kris
    Mar 19 at 10:34






  • 1





    Yes, you can omit the auxiliary "are". But I much prefer to retain it, especially in formal contexts.

    – BillJ
    Mar 19 at 10:37















0















In the statement:




Exports are a virtue and imports are a vice




Would it be okay to omit the second "are"? Thus becoming:




Exports are a virtue and imports a vice




If it was grammatically incorrect, I wonder if it is still appropriate to omit the verb in a formal setting. I feel like the latter way of phrasing the sentence rolls off the tongue better.










share|improve this question






















  • Actually, it's the main (linking or copulative) verb.

    – Gustavson
    Mar 19 at 9:53






  • 1





    "... if it is still appropriate to omit the verb in a formal setting" -- yes, and preferable. If still unconvinced, include a comma after imports for clarity. HTH.

    – Kris
    Mar 19 at 10:34






  • 1





    Yes, you can omit the auxiliary "are". But I much prefer to retain it, especially in formal contexts.

    – BillJ
    Mar 19 at 10:37













0












0








0








In the statement:




Exports are a virtue and imports are a vice




Would it be okay to omit the second "are"? Thus becoming:




Exports are a virtue and imports a vice




If it was grammatically incorrect, I wonder if it is still appropriate to omit the verb in a formal setting. I feel like the latter way of phrasing the sentence rolls off the tongue better.










share|improve this question














In the statement:




Exports are a virtue and imports are a vice




Would it be okay to omit the second "are"? Thus becoming:




Exports are a virtue and imports a vice




If it was grammatically incorrect, I wonder if it is still appropriate to omit the verb in a formal setting. I feel like the latter way of phrasing the sentence rolls off the tongue better.







auxiliary-verbs






share|improve this question













share|improve this question











share|improve this question




share|improve this question










asked Mar 19 at 9:00









David TohDavid Toh

1573313




1573313












  • Actually, it's the main (linking or copulative) verb.

    – Gustavson
    Mar 19 at 9:53






  • 1





    "... if it is still appropriate to omit the verb in a formal setting" -- yes, and preferable. If still unconvinced, include a comma after imports for clarity. HTH.

    – Kris
    Mar 19 at 10:34






  • 1





    Yes, you can omit the auxiliary "are". But I much prefer to retain it, especially in formal contexts.

    – BillJ
    Mar 19 at 10:37

















  • Actually, it's the main (linking or copulative) verb.

    – Gustavson
    Mar 19 at 9:53






  • 1





    "... if it is still appropriate to omit the verb in a formal setting" -- yes, and preferable. If still unconvinced, include a comma after imports for clarity. HTH.

    – Kris
    Mar 19 at 10:34






  • 1





    Yes, you can omit the auxiliary "are". But I much prefer to retain it, especially in formal contexts.

    – BillJ
    Mar 19 at 10:37
















Actually, it's the main (linking or copulative) verb.

– Gustavson
Mar 19 at 9:53





Actually, it's the main (linking or copulative) verb.

– Gustavson
Mar 19 at 9:53




1




1





"... if it is still appropriate to omit the verb in a formal setting" -- yes, and preferable. If still unconvinced, include a comma after imports for clarity. HTH.

– Kris
Mar 19 at 10:34





"... if it is still appropriate to omit the verb in a formal setting" -- yes, and preferable. If still unconvinced, include a comma after imports for clarity. HTH.

– Kris
Mar 19 at 10:34




1




1





Yes, you can omit the auxiliary "are". But I much prefer to retain it, especially in formal contexts.

– BillJ
Mar 19 at 10:37





Yes, you can omit the auxiliary "are". But I much prefer to retain it, especially in formal contexts.

– BillJ
Mar 19 at 10:37










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















1














Yes. V-deletion is quite common, especially with conjunctive clauses.



Consider:



(1) I like milk and bread



(2) Someone will be happy and generous.



Closer to your example:



(3) My dog is a canine and my cat a feline.



That being said, since 'imports' is a verbal noun, it is best to retain the verb. The ambiguity of 'imports' - the ambiguity between a NP reading and a VP reading - makes parsing quite difficult. Syntactically, the issue is that 'imports' might be read as a present verb whose argument is the clause preceding the conjunction: 'exports (which are virtuous) import (x)'. So best keep the verb.






share|improve this answer








New contributor




Jeremiah Cashore is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.



















    Your Answer








    StackExchange.ready(function()
    var channelOptions =
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "97"
    ;
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
    createEditor();
    );

    else
    createEditor();

    );

    function createEditor()
    StackExchange.prepareEditor(
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: false,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: null,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader:
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    ,
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    );



    );













    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function ()
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fenglish.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f490364%2fis-it-appropriate-to-omit-an-auxiliary-verb-in-this-case%23new-answer', 'question_page');

    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes








    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    1














    Yes. V-deletion is quite common, especially with conjunctive clauses.



    Consider:



    (1) I like milk and bread



    (2) Someone will be happy and generous.



    Closer to your example:



    (3) My dog is a canine and my cat a feline.



    That being said, since 'imports' is a verbal noun, it is best to retain the verb. The ambiguity of 'imports' - the ambiguity between a NP reading and a VP reading - makes parsing quite difficult. Syntactically, the issue is that 'imports' might be read as a present verb whose argument is the clause preceding the conjunction: 'exports (which are virtuous) import (x)'. So best keep the verb.






    share|improve this answer








    New contributor




    Jeremiah Cashore is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
    Check out our Code of Conduct.
























      1














      Yes. V-deletion is quite common, especially with conjunctive clauses.



      Consider:



      (1) I like milk and bread



      (2) Someone will be happy and generous.



      Closer to your example:



      (3) My dog is a canine and my cat a feline.



      That being said, since 'imports' is a verbal noun, it is best to retain the verb. The ambiguity of 'imports' - the ambiguity between a NP reading and a VP reading - makes parsing quite difficult. Syntactically, the issue is that 'imports' might be read as a present verb whose argument is the clause preceding the conjunction: 'exports (which are virtuous) import (x)'. So best keep the verb.






      share|improve this answer








      New contributor




      Jeremiah Cashore is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.






















        1












        1








        1







        Yes. V-deletion is quite common, especially with conjunctive clauses.



        Consider:



        (1) I like milk and bread



        (2) Someone will be happy and generous.



        Closer to your example:



        (3) My dog is a canine and my cat a feline.



        That being said, since 'imports' is a verbal noun, it is best to retain the verb. The ambiguity of 'imports' - the ambiguity between a NP reading and a VP reading - makes parsing quite difficult. Syntactically, the issue is that 'imports' might be read as a present verb whose argument is the clause preceding the conjunction: 'exports (which are virtuous) import (x)'. So best keep the verb.






        share|improve this answer








        New contributor




        Jeremiah Cashore is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
        Check out our Code of Conduct.










        Yes. V-deletion is quite common, especially with conjunctive clauses.



        Consider:



        (1) I like milk and bread



        (2) Someone will be happy and generous.



        Closer to your example:



        (3) My dog is a canine and my cat a feline.



        That being said, since 'imports' is a verbal noun, it is best to retain the verb. The ambiguity of 'imports' - the ambiguity between a NP reading and a VP reading - makes parsing quite difficult. Syntactically, the issue is that 'imports' might be read as a present verb whose argument is the clause preceding the conjunction: 'exports (which are virtuous) import (x)'. So best keep the verb.







        share|improve this answer








        New contributor




        Jeremiah Cashore is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
        Check out our Code of Conduct.









        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer






        New contributor




        Jeremiah Cashore is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
        Check out our Code of Conduct.









        answered Mar 20 at 2:51









        Jeremiah CashoreJeremiah Cashore

        71




        71




        New contributor




        Jeremiah Cashore is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
        Check out our Code of Conduct.





        New contributor





        Jeremiah Cashore is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
        Check out our Code of Conduct.






        Jeremiah Cashore is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
        Check out our Code of Conduct.



























            draft saved

            draft discarded
















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to English Language & Usage Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid


            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fenglish.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f490364%2fis-it-appropriate-to-omit-an-auxiliary-verb-in-this-case%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Færeyskur hestur Heimild | Tengill | Tilvísanir | LeiðsagnarvalRossið - síða um færeyska hrossið á færeyskuGott ár hjá færeyska hestinum

            He _____ here since 1970 . Answer needed [closed]What does “since he was so high” mean?Meaning of “catch birds for”?How do I ensure “since” takes the meaning I want?“Who cares here” meaningWhat does “right round toward” mean?the time tense (had now been detected)What does the phrase “ring around the roses” mean here?Correct usage of “visited upon”Meaning of “foiled rail sabotage bid”It was the third time I had gone to Rome or It is the third time I had been to Rome

            Slayer Innehåll Historia | Stil, komposition och lyrik | Bandets betydelse och framgångar | Sidoprojekt och samarbeten | Kontroverser | Medlemmar | Utmärkelser och nomineringar | Turnéer och festivaler | Diskografi | Referenser | Externa länkar | Navigeringsmenywww.slayer.net”Metal Massacre vol. 1””Metal Massacre vol. 3””Metal Massacre Volume III””Show No Mercy””Haunting the Chapel””Live Undead””Hell Awaits””Reign in Blood””Reign in Blood””Gold & Platinum – Reign in Blood””Golden Gods Awards Winners”originalet”Kerrang! Hall Of Fame””Slayer Looks Back On 37-Year Career In New Video Series: Part Two””South of Heaven””Gold & Platinum – South of Heaven””Seasons in the Abyss””Gold & Platinum - Seasons in the Abyss””Divine Intervention””Divine Intervention - Release group by Slayer””Gold & Platinum - Divine Intervention””Live Intrusion””Undisputed Attitude””Abolish Government/Superficial Love””Release “Slatanic Slaughter: A Tribute to Slayer” by Various Artists””Diabolus in Musica””Soundtrack to the Apocalypse””God Hates Us All””Systematic - Relationships””War at the Warfield””Gold & Platinum - War at the Warfield””Soundtrack to the Apocalypse””Gold & Platinum - Still Reigning””Metallica, Slayer, Iron Mauden Among Winners At Metal Hammer Awards””Eternal Pyre””Eternal Pyre - Slayer release group””Eternal Pyre””Metal Storm Awards 2006””Kerrang! Hall Of Fame””Slayer Wins 'Best Metal' Grammy Award””Slayer Guitarist Jeff Hanneman Dies””Bullet-For My Valentine booed at Metal Hammer Golden Gods Awards””Unholy Aliance””The End Of Slayer?””Slayer: We Could Thrash Out Two More Albums If We're Fast Enough...””'The Unholy Alliance: Chapter III' UK Dates Added”originalet”Megadeth And Slayer To Co-Headline 'Canadian Carnage' Trek”originalet”World Painted Blood””Release “World Painted Blood” by Slayer””Metallica Heading To Cinemas””Slayer, Megadeth To Join Forces For 'European Carnage' Tour - Dec. 18, 2010”originalet”Slayer's Hanneman Contracts Acute Infection; Band To Bring In Guest Guitarist””Cannibal Corpse's Pat O'Brien Will Step In As Slayer's Guest Guitarist”originalet”Slayer’s Jeff Hanneman Dead at 49””Dave Lombardo Says He Made Only $67,000 In 2011 While Touring With Slayer””Slayer: We Do Not Agree With Dave Lombardo's Substance Or Timeline Of Events””Slayer Welcomes Drummer Paul Bostaph Back To The Fold””Slayer Hope to Unveil Never-Before-Heard Jeff Hanneman Material on Next Album””Slayer Debut New Song 'Implode' During Surprise Golden Gods Appearance””Release group Repentless by Slayer””Repentless - Slayer - Credits””Slayer””Metal Storm Awards 2015””Slayer - to release comic book "Repentless #1"””Slayer To Release 'Repentless' 6.66" Vinyl Box Set””BREAKING NEWS: Slayer Announce Farewell Tour””Slayer Recruit Lamb of God, Anthrax, Behemoth + Testament for Final Tour””Slayer lägger ner efter 37 år””Slayer Announces Second North American Leg Of 'Final' Tour””Final World Tour””Slayer Announces Final European Tour With Lamb of God, Anthrax And Obituary””Slayer To Tour Europe With Lamb of God, Anthrax And Obituary””Slayer To Play 'Last French Show Ever' At Next Year's Hellfst””Slayer's Final World Tour Will Extend Into 2019””Death Angel's Rob Cavestany On Slayer's 'Farewell' Tour: 'Some Of Us Could See This Coming'””Testament Has No Plans To Retire Anytime Soon, Says Chuck Billy””Anthrax's Scott Ian On Slayer's 'Farewell' Tour Plans: 'I Was Surprised And I Wasn't Surprised'””Slayer””Slayer's Morbid Schlock””Review/Rock; For Slayer, the Mania Is the Message””Slayer - Biography””Slayer - Reign In Blood”originalet”Dave Lombardo””An exclusive oral history of Slayer”originalet”Exclusive! Interview With Slayer Guitarist Jeff Hanneman”originalet”Thinking Out Loud: Slayer's Kerry King on hair metal, Satan and being polite””Slayer Lyrics””Slayer - Biography””Most influential artists for extreme metal music””Slayer - Reign in Blood””Slayer guitarist Jeff Hanneman dies aged 49””Slatanic Slaughter: A Tribute to Slayer””Gateway to Hell: A Tribute to Slayer””Covered In Blood””Slayer: The Origins of Thrash in San Francisco, CA.””Why They Rule - #6 Slayer”originalet”Guitar World's 100 Greatest Heavy Metal Guitarists Of All Time”originalet”The fans have spoken: Slayer comes out on top in readers' polls”originalet”Tribute to Jeff Hanneman (1964-2013)””Lamb Of God Frontman: We Sound Like A Slayer Rip-Off””BEHEMOTH Frontman Pays Tribute To SLAYER's JEFF HANNEMAN””Slayer, Hatebreed Doing Double Duty On This Year's Ozzfest””System of a Down””Lacuna Coil’s Andrea Ferro Talks Influences, Skateboarding, Band Origins + More””Slayer - Reign in Blood””Into The Lungs of Hell””Slayer rules - en utställning om fans””Slayer and Their Fans Slashed Through a No-Holds-Barred Night at Gas Monkey””Home””Slayer””Gold & Platinum - The Big 4 Live from Sofia, Bulgaria””Exclusive! Interview With Slayer Guitarist Kerry King””2008-02-23: Wiltern, Los Angeles, CA, USA””Slayer's Kerry King To Perform With Megadeth Tonight! - Oct. 21, 2010”originalet”Dave Lombardo - Biography”Slayer Case DismissedArkiveradUltimate Classic Rock: Slayer guitarist Jeff Hanneman dead at 49.”Slayer: "We could never do any thing like Some Kind Of Monster..."””Cannibal Corpse'S Pat O'Brien Will Step In As Slayer'S Guest Guitarist | The Official Slayer Site”originalet”Slayer Wins 'Best Metal' Grammy Award””Slayer Guitarist Jeff Hanneman Dies””Kerrang! Awards 2006 Blog: Kerrang! Hall Of Fame””Kerrang! Awards 2013: Kerrang! Legend”originalet”Metallica, Slayer, Iron Maien Among Winners At Metal Hammer Awards””Metal Hammer Golden Gods Awards””Bullet For My Valentine Booed At Metal Hammer Golden Gods Awards””Metal Storm Awards 2006””Metal Storm Awards 2015””Slayer's Concert History””Slayer - Relationships””Slayer - Releases”Slayers officiella webbplatsSlayer på MusicBrainzOfficiell webbplatsSlayerSlayerr1373445760000 0001 1540 47353068615-5086262726cb13906545x(data)6033143kn20030215029