How can a C program poll for user input while simultaneously performing other actions in a Linux environment?





.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty{ height:90px;width:728px;box-sizing:border-box;
}







6















Background:



I'm a relatively inexperienced developer trying to write software to interface with a PCI motion controller. I'm using C (compiled with gcc) on Ubuntu Linux 18.04.



The program I'm writing needs to regularly check for unsolicited status messages sent by the motion controller (approx. once per second) and display any messages it finds on a terminal screen (for which I'm using the ncurses library).



What I have:



Right now, to do this, I'm calling a function that checks for unsolicited messages in a while loop. The code is roughly akin to:



while (1)
{
// check for messages from PCI and store them in a traffic buffer
checkForMessages(PCIconnection, trafficBuffer);

// output the traffic buffer to the screen
printf("%s", trafficBuffer);
}


What I need:



I need the user to be prompted for input in a way that allows them to end the loop. For example, the user could input end causing the loop to stop and the program to continue.



The problem:



I'm not aware of a way to achieve this without putting fgets inside the while loop, causing the program to stop and wait for the user to input something on every loop iteration.



I've looked for a solution, but I haven't been able to find discussion on how to achieve the functionality I need. Opening a new thread or process seems like a step in the right direction?



I'm open to completely restructuring my code if what I'm currently doing is poor practice.



Thank you for any help!










share|improve this question







New contributor




josephsturm is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.



























    6















    Background:



    I'm a relatively inexperienced developer trying to write software to interface with a PCI motion controller. I'm using C (compiled with gcc) on Ubuntu Linux 18.04.



    The program I'm writing needs to regularly check for unsolicited status messages sent by the motion controller (approx. once per second) and display any messages it finds on a terminal screen (for which I'm using the ncurses library).



    What I have:



    Right now, to do this, I'm calling a function that checks for unsolicited messages in a while loop. The code is roughly akin to:



    while (1)
    {
    // check for messages from PCI and store them in a traffic buffer
    checkForMessages(PCIconnection, trafficBuffer);

    // output the traffic buffer to the screen
    printf("%s", trafficBuffer);
    }


    What I need:



    I need the user to be prompted for input in a way that allows them to end the loop. For example, the user could input end causing the loop to stop and the program to continue.



    The problem:



    I'm not aware of a way to achieve this without putting fgets inside the while loop, causing the program to stop and wait for the user to input something on every loop iteration.



    I've looked for a solution, but I haven't been able to find discussion on how to achieve the functionality I need. Opening a new thread or process seems like a step in the right direction?



    I'm open to completely restructuring my code if what I'm currently doing is poor practice.



    Thank you for any help!










    share|improve this question







    New contributor




    josephsturm is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
    Check out our Code of Conduct.























      6












      6








      6








      Background:



      I'm a relatively inexperienced developer trying to write software to interface with a PCI motion controller. I'm using C (compiled with gcc) on Ubuntu Linux 18.04.



      The program I'm writing needs to regularly check for unsolicited status messages sent by the motion controller (approx. once per second) and display any messages it finds on a terminal screen (for which I'm using the ncurses library).



      What I have:



      Right now, to do this, I'm calling a function that checks for unsolicited messages in a while loop. The code is roughly akin to:



      while (1)
      {
      // check for messages from PCI and store them in a traffic buffer
      checkForMessages(PCIconnection, trafficBuffer);

      // output the traffic buffer to the screen
      printf("%s", trafficBuffer);
      }


      What I need:



      I need the user to be prompted for input in a way that allows them to end the loop. For example, the user could input end causing the loop to stop and the program to continue.



      The problem:



      I'm not aware of a way to achieve this without putting fgets inside the while loop, causing the program to stop and wait for the user to input something on every loop iteration.



      I've looked for a solution, but I haven't been able to find discussion on how to achieve the functionality I need. Opening a new thread or process seems like a step in the right direction?



      I'm open to completely restructuring my code if what I'm currently doing is poor practice.



      Thank you for any help!










      share|improve this question







      New contributor




      josephsturm is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.












      Background:



      I'm a relatively inexperienced developer trying to write software to interface with a PCI motion controller. I'm using C (compiled with gcc) on Ubuntu Linux 18.04.



      The program I'm writing needs to regularly check for unsolicited status messages sent by the motion controller (approx. once per second) and display any messages it finds on a terminal screen (for which I'm using the ncurses library).



      What I have:



      Right now, to do this, I'm calling a function that checks for unsolicited messages in a while loop. The code is roughly akin to:



      while (1)
      {
      // check for messages from PCI and store them in a traffic buffer
      checkForMessages(PCIconnection, trafficBuffer);

      // output the traffic buffer to the screen
      printf("%s", trafficBuffer);
      }


      What I need:



      I need the user to be prompted for input in a way that allows them to end the loop. For example, the user could input end causing the loop to stop and the program to continue.



      The problem:



      I'm not aware of a way to achieve this without putting fgets inside the while loop, causing the program to stop and wait for the user to input something on every loop iteration.



      I've looked for a solution, but I haven't been able to find discussion on how to achieve the functionality I need. Opening a new thread or process seems like a step in the right direction?



      I'm open to completely restructuring my code if what I'm currently doing is poor practice.



      Thank you for any help!







      c linux






      share|improve this question







      New contributor




      josephsturm is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.











      share|improve this question







      New contributor




      josephsturm is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.









      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question






      New contributor




      josephsturm is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.









      asked 7 hours ago









      josephsturmjosephsturm

      334




      334




      New contributor




      josephsturm is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.





      New contributor





      josephsturm is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.






      josephsturm is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.
























          3 Answers
          3






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          6














          Your task requires an event loop based on select or epoll. One event it would wait for is user input - when STDIN_FILENO becomes ready for read. Another is the 1-second periodic timer when you need to poll the controller.



          There are quite a few libraries that implement an event loop for you so that you can focus on what events you need to handle and how. libevent is one of the oldest, feature rich and popular.






          share|improve this answer
























          • Thank you for answering! This is definitely a valid answer to the question I asked, so I'm accepting it. After a lot more reading, I also discovered that there's an answer built into ncurses itself. Calling the function timeout and passing it 0 makes getch (an ncurses input function) non-blocking, which also solved my problem.

            – josephsturm
            1 hour ago





















          3














          Simple answer is multi-threading, where you have thread deployed to wait for user input, while loop continues on. So have this:



          char flag = 1;

          while (flag) {
          // run the loop

          // if thing happens deploy the thread which will ask user for input

          }


          I have not done threading in a while, I think this page would be better than me trying to explain it to you:
          https://randu.org/tutorials/threads/






          share|improve this answer



















          • 1





            But see 5 Big Fat Reasons Why Mutexes Suck Big Time for a few considerations on multi-threading.

            – David C. Rankin
            6 hours ago











          • tnx will read this article

            – Gox
            6 hours ago











          • Yes, I'd didn't have much of a feel one way or the other about where and what kind of pitfalls were involved in multithreading until that article was posted on the accu-general mailing list accu-general@accu.org. It makes some very good points on the inherent inability to validate multithreaded code.

            – David C. Rankin
            5 hours ago



















          2














          I believe that the "Unix" way would be not to ask for user input, but to react to a user signal. For example, when the user presses Ctrl-C, the currently running process receives SIGINT.



          An example how to properly use SIGINT to interrupt a loop can be found here. Copying it into the answer in case the link gets stale:



          #include <stdlib.h>
          #include <signal.h>
          #include <stdio.h>
          #include <string.h>
          #include <unistd.h>

          static volatile sig_atomic_t got_signal = 0;

          static void my_sig_handler(int signo)
          {
          got_signal = 1;
          }

          int main()
          {
          struct sigaction sa;

          memset(&sa, 0, sizeof(struct sigaction));
          sa.sa_handler = &my_sig_handler;
          if (sigaction(SIGINT, &sa, NULL) == -1) {
          perror("sigaction");
          return EXIT_FAILURE;
          }

          for (;;) {
          if (got_signal) {
          got_signal = 0;
          printf("Received interrupt signal!n");
          }
          printf("Doing useful stuff...n");
          sleep(1); /* Sleep is not only useful, it is essential! */
          }
          return EXIT_SUCCESS;
          }


          (in your case it would be a good idea to put break; into the if block or to use while(!got_signal))






          share|improve this answer
























            Your Answer






            StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
            StackExchange.snippets.init();
            });
            });
            }, "code-snippets");

            StackExchange.ready(function() {
            var channelOptions = {
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "1"
            };
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
            createEditor();
            });
            }
            else {
            createEditor();
            }
            });

            function createEditor() {
            StackExchange.prepareEditor({
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
            convertImagesToLinks: true,
            noModals: true,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: 10,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            imageUploader: {
            brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
            contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
            allowUrls: true
            },
            onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            });


            }
            });






            josephsturm is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.










            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f55660630%2fhow-can-a-c-program-poll-for-user-input-while-simultaneously-performing-other-ac%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown

























            3 Answers
            3






            active

            oldest

            votes








            3 Answers
            3






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes









            6














            Your task requires an event loop based on select or epoll. One event it would wait for is user input - when STDIN_FILENO becomes ready for read. Another is the 1-second periodic timer when you need to poll the controller.



            There are quite a few libraries that implement an event loop for you so that you can focus on what events you need to handle and how. libevent is one of the oldest, feature rich and popular.






            share|improve this answer
























            • Thank you for answering! This is definitely a valid answer to the question I asked, so I'm accepting it. After a lot more reading, I also discovered that there's an answer built into ncurses itself. Calling the function timeout and passing it 0 makes getch (an ncurses input function) non-blocking, which also solved my problem.

              – josephsturm
              1 hour ago


















            6














            Your task requires an event loop based on select or epoll. One event it would wait for is user input - when STDIN_FILENO becomes ready for read. Another is the 1-second periodic timer when you need to poll the controller.



            There are quite a few libraries that implement an event loop for you so that you can focus on what events you need to handle and how. libevent is one of the oldest, feature rich and popular.






            share|improve this answer
























            • Thank you for answering! This is definitely a valid answer to the question I asked, so I'm accepting it. After a lot more reading, I also discovered that there's an answer built into ncurses itself. Calling the function timeout and passing it 0 makes getch (an ncurses input function) non-blocking, which also solved my problem.

              – josephsturm
              1 hour ago
















            6












            6








            6







            Your task requires an event loop based on select or epoll. One event it would wait for is user input - when STDIN_FILENO becomes ready for read. Another is the 1-second periodic timer when you need to poll the controller.



            There are quite a few libraries that implement an event loop for you so that you can focus on what events you need to handle and how. libevent is one of the oldest, feature rich and popular.






            share|improve this answer













            Your task requires an event loop based on select or epoll. One event it would wait for is user input - when STDIN_FILENO becomes ready for read. Another is the 1-second periodic timer when you need to poll the controller.



            There are quite a few libraries that implement an event loop for you so that you can focus on what events you need to handle and how. libevent is one of the oldest, feature rich and popular.







            share|improve this answer












            share|improve this answer



            share|improve this answer










            answered 7 hours ago









            Maxim EgorushkinMaxim Egorushkin

            90.2k11104192




            90.2k11104192













            • Thank you for answering! This is definitely a valid answer to the question I asked, so I'm accepting it. After a lot more reading, I also discovered that there's an answer built into ncurses itself. Calling the function timeout and passing it 0 makes getch (an ncurses input function) non-blocking, which also solved my problem.

              – josephsturm
              1 hour ago





















            • Thank you for answering! This is definitely a valid answer to the question I asked, so I'm accepting it. After a lot more reading, I also discovered that there's an answer built into ncurses itself. Calling the function timeout and passing it 0 makes getch (an ncurses input function) non-blocking, which also solved my problem.

              – josephsturm
              1 hour ago



















            Thank you for answering! This is definitely a valid answer to the question I asked, so I'm accepting it. After a lot more reading, I also discovered that there's an answer built into ncurses itself. Calling the function timeout and passing it 0 makes getch (an ncurses input function) non-blocking, which also solved my problem.

            – josephsturm
            1 hour ago







            Thank you for answering! This is definitely a valid answer to the question I asked, so I'm accepting it. After a lot more reading, I also discovered that there's an answer built into ncurses itself. Calling the function timeout and passing it 0 makes getch (an ncurses input function) non-blocking, which also solved my problem.

            – josephsturm
            1 hour ago















            3














            Simple answer is multi-threading, where you have thread deployed to wait for user input, while loop continues on. So have this:



            char flag = 1;

            while (flag) {
            // run the loop

            // if thing happens deploy the thread which will ask user for input

            }


            I have not done threading in a while, I think this page would be better than me trying to explain it to you:
            https://randu.org/tutorials/threads/






            share|improve this answer



















            • 1





              But see 5 Big Fat Reasons Why Mutexes Suck Big Time for a few considerations on multi-threading.

              – David C. Rankin
              6 hours ago











            • tnx will read this article

              – Gox
              6 hours ago











            • Yes, I'd didn't have much of a feel one way or the other about where and what kind of pitfalls were involved in multithreading until that article was posted on the accu-general mailing list accu-general@accu.org. It makes some very good points on the inherent inability to validate multithreaded code.

              – David C. Rankin
              5 hours ago
















            3














            Simple answer is multi-threading, where you have thread deployed to wait for user input, while loop continues on. So have this:



            char flag = 1;

            while (flag) {
            // run the loop

            // if thing happens deploy the thread which will ask user for input

            }


            I have not done threading in a while, I think this page would be better than me trying to explain it to you:
            https://randu.org/tutorials/threads/






            share|improve this answer



















            • 1





              But see 5 Big Fat Reasons Why Mutexes Suck Big Time for a few considerations on multi-threading.

              – David C. Rankin
              6 hours ago











            • tnx will read this article

              – Gox
              6 hours ago











            • Yes, I'd didn't have much of a feel one way or the other about where and what kind of pitfalls were involved in multithreading until that article was posted on the accu-general mailing list accu-general@accu.org. It makes some very good points on the inherent inability to validate multithreaded code.

              – David C. Rankin
              5 hours ago














            3












            3








            3







            Simple answer is multi-threading, where you have thread deployed to wait for user input, while loop continues on. So have this:



            char flag = 1;

            while (flag) {
            // run the loop

            // if thing happens deploy the thread which will ask user for input

            }


            I have not done threading in a while, I think this page would be better than me trying to explain it to you:
            https://randu.org/tutorials/threads/






            share|improve this answer













            Simple answer is multi-threading, where you have thread deployed to wait for user input, while loop continues on. So have this:



            char flag = 1;

            while (flag) {
            // run the loop

            // if thing happens deploy the thread which will ask user for input

            }


            I have not done threading in a while, I think this page would be better than me trying to explain it to you:
            https://randu.org/tutorials/threads/







            share|improve this answer












            share|improve this answer



            share|improve this answer










            answered 7 hours ago









            GoxGox

            2,42121129




            2,42121129








            • 1





              But see 5 Big Fat Reasons Why Mutexes Suck Big Time for a few considerations on multi-threading.

              – David C. Rankin
              6 hours ago











            • tnx will read this article

              – Gox
              6 hours ago











            • Yes, I'd didn't have much of a feel one way or the other about where and what kind of pitfalls were involved in multithreading until that article was posted on the accu-general mailing list accu-general@accu.org. It makes some very good points on the inherent inability to validate multithreaded code.

              – David C. Rankin
              5 hours ago














            • 1





              But see 5 Big Fat Reasons Why Mutexes Suck Big Time for a few considerations on multi-threading.

              – David C. Rankin
              6 hours ago











            • tnx will read this article

              – Gox
              6 hours ago











            • Yes, I'd didn't have much of a feel one way or the other about where and what kind of pitfalls were involved in multithreading until that article was posted on the accu-general mailing list accu-general@accu.org. It makes some very good points on the inherent inability to validate multithreaded code.

              – David C. Rankin
              5 hours ago








            1




            1





            But see 5 Big Fat Reasons Why Mutexes Suck Big Time for a few considerations on multi-threading.

            – David C. Rankin
            6 hours ago





            But see 5 Big Fat Reasons Why Mutexes Suck Big Time for a few considerations on multi-threading.

            – David C. Rankin
            6 hours ago













            tnx will read this article

            – Gox
            6 hours ago





            tnx will read this article

            – Gox
            6 hours ago













            Yes, I'd didn't have much of a feel one way or the other about where and what kind of pitfalls were involved in multithreading until that article was posted on the accu-general mailing list accu-general@accu.org. It makes some very good points on the inherent inability to validate multithreaded code.

            – David C. Rankin
            5 hours ago





            Yes, I'd didn't have much of a feel one way or the other about where and what kind of pitfalls were involved in multithreading until that article was posted on the accu-general mailing list accu-general@accu.org. It makes some very good points on the inherent inability to validate multithreaded code.

            – David C. Rankin
            5 hours ago











            2














            I believe that the "Unix" way would be not to ask for user input, but to react to a user signal. For example, when the user presses Ctrl-C, the currently running process receives SIGINT.



            An example how to properly use SIGINT to interrupt a loop can be found here. Copying it into the answer in case the link gets stale:



            #include <stdlib.h>
            #include <signal.h>
            #include <stdio.h>
            #include <string.h>
            #include <unistd.h>

            static volatile sig_atomic_t got_signal = 0;

            static void my_sig_handler(int signo)
            {
            got_signal = 1;
            }

            int main()
            {
            struct sigaction sa;

            memset(&sa, 0, sizeof(struct sigaction));
            sa.sa_handler = &my_sig_handler;
            if (sigaction(SIGINT, &sa, NULL) == -1) {
            perror("sigaction");
            return EXIT_FAILURE;
            }

            for (;;) {
            if (got_signal) {
            got_signal = 0;
            printf("Received interrupt signal!n");
            }
            printf("Doing useful stuff...n");
            sleep(1); /* Sleep is not only useful, it is essential! */
            }
            return EXIT_SUCCESS;
            }


            (in your case it would be a good idea to put break; into the if block or to use while(!got_signal))






            share|improve this answer




























              2














              I believe that the "Unix" way would be not to ask for user input, but to react to a user signal. For example, when the user presses Ctrl-C, the currently running process receives SIGINT.



              An example how to properly use SIGINT to interrupt a loop can be found here. Copying it into the answer in case the link gets stale:



              #include <stdlib.h>
              #include <signal.h>
              #include <stdio.h>
              #include <string.h>
              #include <unistd.h>

              static volatile sig_atomic_t got_signal = 0;

              static void my_sig_handler(int signo)
              {
              got_signal = 1;
              }

              int main()
              {
              struct sigaction sa;

              memset(&sa, 0, sizeof(struct sigaction));
              sa.sa_handler = &my_sig_handler;
              if (sigaction(SIGINT, &sa, NULL) == -1) {
              perror("sigaction");
              return EXIT_FAILURE;
              }

              for (;;) {
              if (got_signal) {
              got_signal = 0;
              printf("Received interrupt signal!n");
              }
              printf("Doing useful stuff...n");
              sleep(1); /* Sleep is not only useful, it is essential! */
              }
              return EXIT_SUCCESS;
              }


              (in your case it would be a good idea to put break; into the if block or to use while(!got_signal))






              share|improve this answer


























                2












                2








                2







                I believe that the "Unix" way would be not to ask for user input, but to react to a user signal. For example, when the user presses Ctrl-C, the currently running process receives SIGINT.



                An example how to properly use SIGINT to interrupt a loop can be found here. Copying it into the answer in case the link gets stale:



                #include <stdlib.h>
                #include <signal.h>
                #include <stdio.h>
                #include <string.h>
                #include <unistd.h>

                static volatile sig_atomic_t got_signal = 0;

                static void my_sig_handler(int signo)
                {
                got_signal = 1;
                }

                int main()
                {
                struct sigaction sa;

                memset(&sa, 0, sizeof(struct sigaction));
                sa.sa_handler = &my_sig_handler;
                if (sigaction(SIGINT, &sa, NULL) == -1) {
                perror("sigaction");
                return EXIT_FAILURE;
                }

                for (;;) {
                if (got_signal) {
                got_signal = 0;
                printf("Received interrupt signal!n");
                }
                printf("Doing useful stuff...n");
                sleep(1); /* Sleep is not only useful, it is essential! */
                }
                return EXIT_SUCCESS;
                }


                (in your case it would be a good idea to put break; into the if block or to use while(!got_signal))






                share|improve this answer













                I believe that the "Unix" way would be not to ask for user input, but to react to a user signal. For example, when the user presses Ctrl-C, the currently running process receives SIGINT.



                An example how to properly use SIGINT to interrupt a loop can be found here. Copying it into the answer in case the link gets stale:



                #include <stdlib.h>
                #include <signal.h>
                #include <stdio.h>
                #include <string.h>
                #include <unistd.h>

                static volatile sig_atomic_t got_signal = 0;

                static void my_sig_handler(int signo)
                {
                got_signal = 1;
                }

                int main()
                {
                struct sigaction sa;

                memset(&sa, 0, sizeof(struct sigaction));
                sa.sa_handler = &my_sig_handler;
                if (sigaction(SIGINT, &sa, NULL) == -1) {
                perror("sigaction");
                return EXIT_FAILURE;
                }

                for (;;) {
                if (got_signal) {
                got_signal = 0;
                printf("Received interrupt signal!n");
                }
                printf("Doing useful stuff...n");
                sleep(1); /* Sleep is not only useful, it is essential! */
                }
                return EXIT_SUCCESS;
                }


                (in your case it would be a good idea to put break; into the if block or to use while(!got_signal))







                share|improve this answer












                share|improve this answer



                share|improve this answer










                answered 6 hours ago









                Kit.Kit.

                71069




                71069






















                    josephsturm is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.










                    draft saved

                    draft discarded


















                    josephsturm is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.













                    josephsturm is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.












                    josephsturm is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
















                    Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid



                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function () {
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f55660630%2fhow-can-a-c-program-poll-for-user-input-while-simultaneously-performing-other-ac%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                    }
                    );

                    Post as a guest















                    Required, but never shown





















































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown

































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown







                    Popular posts from this blog

                    Færeyskur hestur Heimild | Tengill | Tilvísanir | LeiðsagnarvalRossið - síða um færeyska hrossið á færeyskuGott ár hjá færeyska hestinum

                    He _____ here since 1970 . Answer needed [closed]What does “since he was so high” mean?Meaning of “catch birds for”?How do I ensure “since” takes the meaning I want?“Who cares here” meaningWhat does “right round toward” mean?the time tense (had now been detected)What does the phrase “ring around the roses” mean here?Correct usage of “visited upon”Meaning of “foiled rail sabotage bid”It was the third time I had gone to Rome or It is the third time I had been to Rome

                    Slayer Innehåll Historia | Stil, komposition och lyrik | Bandets betydelse och framgångar | Sidoprojekt och samarbeten | Kontroverser | Medlemmar | Utmärkelser och nomineringar | Turnéer och festivaler | Diskografi | Referenser | Externa länkar | Navigeringsmenywww.slayer.net”Metal Massacre vol. 1””Metal Massacre vol. 3””Metal Massacre Volume III””Show No Mercy””Haunting the Chapel””Live Undead””Hell Awaits””Reign in Blood””Reign in Blood””Gold & Platinum – Reign in Blood””Golden Gods Awards Winners”originalet”Kerrang! Hall Of Fame””Slayer Looks Back On 37-Year Career In New Video Series: Part Two””South of Heaven””Gold & Platinum – South of Heaven””Seasons in the Abyss””Gold & Platinum - Seasons in the Abyss””Divine Intervention””Divine Intervention - Release group by Slayer””Gold & Platinum - Divine Intervention””Live Intrusion””Undisputed Attitude””Abolish Government/Superficial Love””Release “Slatanic Slaughter: A Tribute to Slayer” by Various Artists””Diabolus in Musica””Soundtrack to the Apocalypse””God Hates Us All””Systematic - Relationships””War at the Warfield””Gold & Platinum - War at the Warfield””Soundtrack to the Apocalypse””Gold & Platinum - Still Reigning””Metallica, Slayer, Iron Mauden Among Winners At Metal Hammer Awards””Eternal Pyre””Eternal Pyre - Slayer release group””Eternal Pyre””Metal Storm Awards 2006””Kerrang! Hall Of Fame””Slayer Wins 'Best Metal' Grammy Award””Slayer Guitarist Jeff Hanneman Dies””Bullet-For My Valentine booed at Metal Hammer Golden Gods Awards””Unholy Aliance””The End Of Slayer?””Slayer: We Could Thrash Out Two More Albums If We're Fast Enough...””'The Unholy Alliance: Chapter III' UK Dates Added”originalet”Megadeth And Slayer To Co-Headline 'Canadian Carnage' Trek”originalet”World Painted Blood””Release “World Painted Blood” by Slayer””Metallica Heading To Cinemas””Slayer, Megadeth To Join Forces For 'European Carnage' Tour - Dec. 18, 2010”originalet”Slayer's Hanneman Contracts Acute Infection; Band To Bring In Guest Guitarist””Cannibal Corpse's Pat O'Brien Will Step In As Slayer's Guest Guitarist”originalet”Slayer’s Jeff Hanneman Dead at 49””Dave Lombardo Says He Made Only $67,000 In 2011 While Touring With Slayer””Slayer: We Do Not Agree With Dave Lombardo's Substance Or Timeline Of Events””Slayer Welcomes Drummer Paul Bostaph Back To The Fold””Slayer Hope to Unveil Never-Before-Heard Jeff Hanneman Material on Next Album””Slayer Debut New Song 'Implode' During Surprise Golden Gods Appearance””Release group Repentless by Slayer””Repentless - Slayer - Credits””Slayer””Metal Storm Awards 2015””Slayer - to release comic book "Repentless #1"””Slayer To Release 'Repentless' 6.66" Vinyl Box Set””BREAKING NEWS: Slayer Announce Farewell Tour””Slayer Recruit Lamb of God, Anthrax, Behemoth + Testament for Final Tour””Slayer lägger ner efter 37 år””Slayer Announces Second North American Leg Of 'Final' Tour””Final World Tour””Slayer Announces Final European Tour With Lamb of God, Anthrax And Obituary””Slayer To Tour Europe With Lamb of God, Anthrax And Obituary””Slayer To Play 'Last French Show Ever' At Next Year's Hellfst””Slayer's Final World Tour Will Extend Into 2019””Death Angel's Rob Cavestany On Slayer's 'Farewell' Tour: 'Some Of Us Could See This Coming'””Testament Has No Plans To Retire Anytime Soon, Says Chuck Billy””Anthrax's Scott Ian On Slayer's 'Farewell' Tour Plans: 'I Was Surprised And I Wasn't Surprised'””Slayer””Slayer's Morbid Schlock””Review/Rock; For Slayer, the Mania Is the Message””Slayer - Biography””Slayer - Reign In Blood”originalet”Dave Lombardo””An exclusive oral history of Slayer”originalet”Exclusive! Interview With Slayer Guitarist Jeff Hanneman”originalet”Thinking Out Loud: Slayer's Kerry King on hair metal, Satan and being polite””Slayer Lyrics””Slayer - Biography””Most influential artists for extreme metal music””Slayer - Reign in Blood””Slayer guitarist Jeff Hanneman dies aged 49””Slatanic Slaughter: A Tribute to Slayer””Gateway to Hell: A Tribute to Slayer””Covered In Blood””Slayer: The Origins of Thrash in San Francisco, CA.””Why They Rule - #6 Slayer”originalet”Guitar World's 100 Greatest Heavy Metal Guitarists Of All Time”originalet”The fans have spoken: Slayer comes out on top in readers' polls”originalet”Tribute to Jeff Hanneman (1964-2013)””Lamb Of God Frontman: We Sound Like A Slayer Rip-Off””BEHEMOTH Frontman Pays Tribute To SLAYER's JEFF HANNEMAN””Slayer, Hatebreed Doing Double Duty On This Year's Ozzfest””System of a Down””Lacuna Coil’s Andrea Ferro Talks Influences, Skateboarding, Band Origins + More””Slayer - Reign in Blood””Into The Lungs of Hell””Slayer rules - en utställning om fans””Slayer and Their Fans Slashed Through a No-Holds-Barred Night at Gas Monkey””Home””Slayer””Gold & Platinum - The Big 4 Live from Sofia, Bulgaria””Exclusive! Interview With Slayer Guitarist Kerry King””2008-02-23: Wiltern, Los Angeles, CA, USA””Slayer's Kerry King To Perform With Megadeth Tonight! - Oct. 21, 2010”originalet”Dave Lombardo - Biography”Slayer Case DismissedArkiveradUltimate Classic Rock: Slayer guitarist Jeff Hanneman dead at 49.”Slayer: "We could never do any thing like Some Kind Of Monster..."””Cannibal Corpse'S Pat O'Brien Will Step In As Slayer'S Guest Guitarist | The Official Slayer Site”originalet”Slayer Wins 'Best Metal' Grammy Award””Slayer Guitarist Jeff Hanneman Dies””Kerrang! Awards 2006 Blog: Kerrang! Hall Of Fame””Kerrang! Awards 2013: Kerrang! Legend”originalet”Metallica, Slayer, Iron Maien Among Winners At Metal Hammer Awards””Metal Hammer Golden Gods Awards””Bullet For My Valentine Booed At Metal Hammer Golden Gods Awards””Metal Storm Awards 2006””Metal Storm Awards 2015””Slayer's Concert History””Slayer - Relationships””Slayer - Releases”Slayers officiella webbplatsSlayer på MusicBrainzOfficiell webbplatsSlayerSlayerr1373445760000 0001 1540 47353068615-5086262726cb13906545x(data)6033143kn20030215029