Use of Perfect Tenses, depending on the position of the phrase 'the first time'?





.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty{ margin-bottom:0;
}







0
















Today, I AM WEARING ice skates for the first time (ever).



Yesterday, I WORE ice skates for the first time (ever).



Tomorrow, I WILL WEAR ice skates for the first time (ever).




with the phrase 'for the first time', versus




Today IS the first time I HAVE (ever) WORN ice skates.



Yesterday WAS the first time I HAD (ever) WORN ice skates.



Tomorrow WILL BE the first time I WILL HAVE (ever) WORN ice skates.




with the phrase 'it is/was/will be the first time'.



Are these tense changes correct? If they are, how come they occur, since the situations described remain the same exactly, irrespective of whether you use 'for the first time' or 'it is/was/will be the first time'?










share|improve this question














bumped to the homepage by Community 11 mins ago


This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed.
















  • Ever is implied by using first time, not by the perfect construction.

    – Robusto
    Feb 21 at 9:04











  • @Robusto: Never mind 'ever', that's not what the question is about, that's why it's in brackets!

    – user58319
    Feb 21 at 11:45













  • It's not the position of the first time that requires the changes. You've also changed today to today is.

    – Peter Shor
    Feb 21 at 15:22













  • I don't think I understand what the question is. I am wearing isn't describing the same situation as I have worn, and I don't see why "the first time" matters. Couldn't you just take that out to simplify the question? I am wearing; I wore; I will wear; I have worn; I had worn; I will have worn (the parts you capitalized) - these are correct conjugations.

    – pabrams
    Mar 7 at 6:04













  • @pabrams: If you are doing something for the first time, then it is the first time you have done it! Why the change of tense, since the situation is the same exactly?! That is what the question is about.

    – user58319
    Mar 12 at 20:34


















0
















Today, I AM WEARING ice skates for the first time (ever).



Yesterday, I WORE ice skates for the first time (ever).



Tomorrow, I WILL WEAR ice skates for the first time (ever).




with the phrase 'for the first time', versus




Today IS the first time I HAVE (ever) WORN ice skates.



Yesterday WAS the first time I HAD (ever) WORN ice skates.



Tomorrow WILL BE the first time I WILL HAVE (ever) WORN ice skates.




with the phrase 'it is/was/will be the first time'.



Are these tense changes correct? If they are, how come they occur, since the situations described remain the same exactly, irrespective of whether you use 'for the first time' or 'it is/was/will be the first time'?










share|improve this question














bumped to the homepage by Community 11 mins ago


This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed.
















  • Ever is implied by using first time, not by the perfect construction.

    – Robusto
    Feb 21 at 9:04











  • @Robusto: Never mind 'ever', that's not what the question is about, that's why it's in brackets!

    – user58319
    Feb 21 at 11:45













  • It's not the position of the first time that requires the changes. You've also changed today to today is.

    – Peter Shor
    Feb 21 at 15:22













  • I don't think I understand what the question is. I am wearing isn't describing the same situation as I have worn, and I don't see why "the first time" matters. Couldn't you just take that out to simplify the question? I am wearing; I wore; I will wear; I have worn; I had worn; I will have worn (the parts you capitalized) - these are correct conjugations.

    – pabrams
    Mar 7 at 6:04













  • @pabrams: If you are doing something for the first time, then it is the first time you have done it! Why the change of tense, since the situation is the same exactly?! That is what the question is about.

    – user58319
    Mar 12 at 20:34














0












0








0









Today, I AM WEARING ice skates for the first time (ever).



Yesterday, I WORE ice skates for the first time (ever).



Tomorrow, I WILL WEAR ice skates for the first time (ever).




with the phrase 'for the first time', versus




Today IS the first time I HAVE (ever) WORN ice skates.



Yesterday WAS the first time I HAD (ever) WORN ice skates.



Tomorrow WILL BE the first time I WILL HAVE (ever) WORN ice skates.




with the phrase 'it is/was/will be the first time'.



Are these tense changes correct? If they are, how come they occur, since the situations described remain the same exactly, irrespective of whether you use 'for the first time' or 'it is/was/will be the first time'?










share|improve this question















Today, I AM WEARING ice skates for the first time (ever).



Yesterday, I WORE ice skates for the first time (ever).



Tomorrow, I WILL WEAR ice skates for the first time (ever).




with the phrase 'for the first time', versus




Today IS the first time I HAVE (ever) WORN ice skates.



Yesterday WAS the first time I HAD (ever) WORN ice skates.



Tomorrow WILL BE the first time I WILL HAVE (ever) WORN ice skates.




with the phrase 'it is/was/will be the first time'.



Are these tense changes correct? If they are, how come they occur, since the situations described remain the same exactly, irrespective of whether you use 'for the first time' or 'it is/was/will be the first time'?







present-perfect simple-past-vs-past-perfect future-perfect






share|improve this question













share|improve this question











share|improve this question




share|improve this question










asked Feb 21 at 8:38









user58319user58319

2,11773268




2,11773268





bumped to the homepage by Community 11 mins ago


This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed.







bumped to the homepage by Community 11 mins ago


This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed.















  • Ever is implied by using first time, not by the perfect construction.

    – Robusto
    Feb 21 at 9:04











  • @Robusto: Never mind 'ever', that's not what the question is about, that's why it's in brackets!

    – user58319
    Feb 21 at 11:45













  • It's not the position of the first time that requires the changes. You've also changed today to today is.

    – Peter Shor
    Feb 21 at 15:22













  • I don't think I understand what the question is. I am wearing isn't describing the same situation as I have worn, and I don't see why "the first time" matters. Couldn't you just take that out to simplify the question? I am wearing; I wore; I will wear; I have worn; I had worn; I will have worn (the parts you capitalized) - these are correct conjugations.

    – pabrams
    Mar 7 at 6:04













  • @pabrams: If you are doing something for the first time, then it is the first time you have done it! Why the change of tense, since the situation is the same exactly?! That is what the question is about.

    – user58319
    Mar 12 at 20:34



















  • Ever is implied by using first time, not by the perfect construction.

    – Robusto
    Feb 21 at 9:04











  • @Robusto: Never mind 'ever', that's not what the question is about, that's why it's in brackets!

    – user58319
    Feb 21 at 11:45













  • It's not the position of the first time that requires the changes. You've also changed today to today is.

    – Peter Shor
    Feb 21 at 15:22













  • I don't think I understand what the question is. I am wearing isn't describing the same situation as I have worn, and I don't see why "the first time" matters. Couldn't you just take that out to simplify the question? I am wearing; I wore; I will wear; I have worn; I had worn; I will have worn (the parts you capitalized) - these are correct conjugations.

    – pabrams
    Mar 7 at 6:04













  • @pabrams: If you are doing something for the first time, then it is the first time you have done it! Why the change of tense, since the situation is the same exactly?! That is what the question is about.

    – user58319
    Mar 12 at 20:34

















Ever is implied by using first time, not by the perfect construction.

– Robusto
Feb 21 at 9:04





Ever is implied by using first time, not by the perfect construction.

– Robusto
Feb 21 at 9:04













@Robusto: Never mind 'ever', that's not what the question is about, that's why it's in brackets!

– user58319
Feb 21 at 11:45







@Robusto: Never mind 'ever', that's not what the question is about, that's why it's in brackets!

– user58319
Feb 21 at 11:45















It's not the position of the first time that requires the changes. You've also changed today to today is.

– Peter Shor
Feb 21 at 15:22







It's not the position of the first time that requires the changes. You've also changed today to today is.

– Peter Shor
Feb 21 at 15:22















I don't think I understand what the question is. I am wearing isn't describing the same situation as I have worn, and I don't see why "the first time" matters. Couldn't you just take that out to simplify the question? I am wearing; I wore; I will wear; I have worn; I had worn; I will have worn (the parts you capitalized) - these are correct conjugations.

– pabrams
Mar 7 at 6:04







I don't think I understand what the question is. I am wearing isn't describing the same situation as I have worn, and I don't see why "the first time" matters. Couldn't you just take that out to simplify the question? I am wearing; I wore; I will wear; I have worn; I had worn; I will have worn (the parts you capitalized) - these are correct conjugations.

– pabrams
Mar 7 at 6:04















@pabrams: If you are doing something for the first time, then it is the first time you have done it! Why the change of tense, since the situation is the same exactly?! That is what the question is about.

– user58319
Mar 12 at 20:34





@pabrams: If you are doing something for the first time, then it is the first time you have done it! Why the change of tense, since the situation is the same exactly?! That is what the question is about.

– user58319
Mar 12 at 20:34










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















0














One of your premises, "the situations described remain the same exactly", is incorrect.



The situations described by your first set of sentences is not quite the same as those described by your second set of sentences. For example, "I am wearing" is not the same as "I have worn"; the first implies you are currently wearing something, and the latter implies that you are no longer wearing it.



If you want to change the position of that phrase without altering the meaning, there are other ways, like, for example, instead of:




Today, I AM WEARING ice skates for the first time ever.




you could say




Today, for the first time ever, I am wearing ice skates




or, somewhat awkwardly, in my opinion:




I am wearing ice skates today, for the first time ever.







share|improve this answer


























    Your Answer








    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "97"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: false,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: null,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fenglish.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f486521%2fuse-of-perfect-tenses-depending-on-the-position-of-the-phrase-the-first-time%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes








    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    0














    One of your premises, "the situations described remain the same exactly", is incorrect.



    The situations described by your first set of sentences is not quite the same as those described by your second set of sentences. For example, "I am wearing" is not the same as "I have worn"; the first implies you are currently wearing something, and the latter implies that you are no longer wearing it.



    If you want to change the position of that phrase without altering the meaning, there are other ways, like, for example, instead of:




    Today, I AM WEARING ice skates for the first time ever.




    you could say




    Today, for the first time ever, I am wearing ice skates




    or, somewhat awkwardly, in my opinion:




    I am wearing ice skates today, for the first time ever.







    share|improve this answer






























      0














      One of your premises, "the situations described remain the same exactly", is incorrect.



      The situations described by your first set of sentences is not quite the same as those described by your second set of sentences. For example, "I am wearing" is not the same as "I have worn"; the first implies you are currently wearing something, and the latter implies that you are no longer wearing it.



      If you want to change the position of that phrase without altering the meaning, there are other ways, like, for example, instead of:




      Today, I AM WEARING ice skates for the first time ever.




      you could say




      Today, for the first time ever, I am wearing ice skates




      or, somewhat awkwardly, in my opinion:




      I am wearing ice skates today, for the first time ever.







      share|improve this answer




























        0












        0








        0







        One of your premises, "the situations described remain the same exactly", is incorrect.



        The situations described by your first set of sentences is not quite the same as those described by your second set of sentences. For example, "I am wearing" is not the same as "I have worn"; the first implies you are currently wearing something, and the latter implies that you are no longer wearing it.



        If you want to change the position of that phrase without altering the meaning, there are other ways, like, for example, instead of:




        Today, I AM WEARING ice skates for the first time ever.




        you could say




        Today, for the first time ever, I am wearing ice skates




        or, somewhat awkwardly, in my opinion:




        I am wearing ice skates today, for the first time ever.







        share|improve this answer















        One of your premises, "the situations described remain the same exactly", is incorrect.



        The situations described by your first set of sentences is not quite the same as those described by your second set of sentences. For example, "I am wearing" is not the same as "I have worn"; the first implies you are currently wearing something, and the latter implies that you are no longer wearing it.



        If you want to change the position of that phrase without altering the meaning, there are other ways, like, for example, instead of:




        Today, I AM WEARING ice skates for the first time ever.




        you could say




        Today, for the first time ever, I am wearing ice skates




        or, somewhat awkwardly, in my opinion:




        I am wearing ice skates today, for the first time ever.








        share|improve this answer














        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer








        edited Mar 13 at 19:20

























        answered Mar 13 at 19:01









        pabramspabrams

        1136




        1136






























            draft saved

            draft discarded




















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to English Language & Usage Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fenglish.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f486521%2fuse-of-perfect-tenses-depending-on-the-position-of-the-phrase-the-first-time%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            He _____ here since 1970 . Answer needed [closed]What does “since he was so high” mean?Meaning of “catch birds for”?How do I ensure “since” takes the meaning I want?“Who cares here” meaningWhat does “right round toward” mean?the time tense (had now been detected)What does the phrase “ring around the roses” mean here?Correct usage of “visited upon”Meaning of “foiled rail sabotage bid”It was the third time I had gone to Rome or It is the third time I had been to Rome

            Bunad

            Færeyskur hestur Heimild | Tengill | Tilvísanir | LeiðsagnarvalRossið - síða um færeyska hrossið á færeyskuGott ár hjá færeyska hestinum