Shouldn't we spell “extrovert” as “extravert”? [closed]When did it become correct to add an “s” to a singular possessive already ending in “‑s”?Origin of “lacksadaisical” (misspelled and mispronounced for “lackadaisical”)Etymology of “ping”Why is it “loggable” rather than “logable”?Why are we supposed to say the “a” as an “e” in “any” and “many”?Spelling of “stop word”Pronunciation of the expletive 'ugh'How should I spell this made up word that's a combination of “squeeze” and “snuggle”?What is the history of the spelling “imflammable” (with M instead of N)?initialised or initialized which one is correct spelling?

What are the differences between credential stuffing and password spraying?

Wrong answer from DSolve when solving a differential equation

How to increase the size of the cursor in Lubuntu 19.04?

As a Bard multi-classing into Warlock, what spells do I get?

Will 700 more planes a day fly because of the Heathrow expansion?

In Russian, how do you idiomatically express the idea of the figurative "overnight"?

What was the first sci-fi story to feature the plot "the humans were the monsters all along"?

Did we get closer to another plane than we were supposed to, or was the pilot just protecting our delicate sensibilities?

How does this change to the opportunity attack rule impact combat?

Should I mention being denied entry to UK due to a confusion in my Visa and Ticket bookings?

Target/total memory is higher than max_server_memory

What is the closest airport to the center of the city it serves?

How can I get a job without pushing my family's income into a higher tax bracket?

What matters more when it comes to book covers? Is it ‘professional quality’ or relevancy?

Why wasn't the Night King naked in S08E03?

Why do people keep telling me that I am a bad photographer?

Didn't attend field-specific conferences during my PhD; how much of a disadvantage is it?

PN junction band gap - equal across all devices?

Validation rule Scheduled Apex

Does a card have a keyword if it has the same effect as said keyword?

UK Bank Holidays

Why has the UK chosen to use Huawei infrastructure when Five Eyes allies haven't?

Understanding trademark infringements in a world where many dictionary words are trademarks?

How long would it take for people to notice a mass disappearance?



Shouldn't we spell “extrovert” as “extravert”? [closed]


When did it become correct to add an “s” to a singular possessive already ending in “‑s”?Origin of “lacksadaisical” (misspelled and mispronounced for “lackadaisical”)Etymology of “ping”Why is it “loggable” rather than “logable”?Why are we supposed to say the “a” as an “e” in “any” and “many”?Spelling of “stop word”Pronunciation of the expletive 'ugh'How should I spell this made up word that's a combination of “squeeze” and “snuggle”?What is the history of the spelling “imflammable” (with M instead of N)?initialised or initialized which one is correct spelling?






.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;








4















I saw the spelling extrovert in a text, but I intuitively felt that the correct spelling is extravert.



I did a little research and read that extravert is commonly used in scientific/technical literature, while extrovert is common in non-technical usage.



From what I read, it seems that this is because in 1918 when the word extravert was becoming more popular and more commonly used outside of technical literature, non-technical people often misspelled it as extrovert because it was commonly paired with the word introvert.



Am I wrong if I choose to always (even in non-technical writing) spell it extravert because I think it is the correct spelling and that I think other people are spelling it incorrectly? Or does majority rule and am I wrong to not conform to the majority?



My question is more about the decision that I need to make (based on which alternative is right or wrong and why) than about this specific example of extrovert vs extravert. I've had similar experiences with other spelling and also grammar rule mismatches, so I'd like to be confident in my decisions in those other situations too.



-Does majority rule? Or are they technically wrong?



If majority does rule, at what point does a misspelling or a grammar error become correct? 50% saturation? 75%? Does the original simultaneously become incorrect at that point? For the example above, if extravert is incorrect to use in non-technical writing, at what point did it become incorrect? Because at one point it was the only way of spelling it, and was only pushed out of popular use by replication of the misspelled form.










share|improve this question















closed as primarily opinion-based by Jim, curiousdannii, Jason Bassford, kiamlaluno, Mitch Apr 5 at 19:01


Many good questions generate some degree of opinion based on expert experience, but answers to this question will tend to be almost entirely based on opinions, rather than facts, references, or specific expertise. If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.













  • 1





    If you’ve got a dictionary behind you- go for it.

    – Jim
    Mar 30 at 6:02











  • I'm not the OP, but I grabbed the nearest dictionary (Webster's New Collegiate 9th) and couldn't find anything about when a misspelling becomes correct or when the original correct spelling becomes incorrect. Is it somewhere in the pages of text in the front, about the history of the English language and dictionaries? I'm not gonna try and find it there with my weak eyes. More guidance, please. Thanks, @Jim

    – bof
    Mar 30 at 6:23











  • @bof I think Jim means that if I have the support of a dictionary that a particular spelling is acceptable then I should feel free to use that spelling however I wish. My issue is that the dictionary I checked shows extravert as correct only for technical usage, and extrovert as correct for popular/non-technical usage, so I don't really "have that dictionary behind me". However, the dictionary in my mind says extravert is always correct and extrovert is always incorrect, while the dictionary in this browser puts a red line under extravert, indicating that it is incorrect.

    – Gimme the 411
    Mar 30 at 6:38












  • A Scientific American blogger here says that in 1918 a certain Phyllis Blanchard wrote a paper in which she translated extravertierte as 'extroversion'. The blogger feels sure this was an error. He notes the modern scientific/popular split between the extra- and extro- usages and claims that the most vociferous champions of extro- are keen Jungians, whereas the extra- users are the present day personality scientists.

    – Michael Harvey
    Mar 30 at 7:56












  • Is it technically wrong to spell "rough" and "laugh" and "though" and "might" with the letters "gh"?

    – Mari-Lou A
    Mar 30 at 7:57

















4















I saw the spelling extrovert in a text, but I intuitively felt that the correct spelling is extravert.



I did a little research and read that extravert is commonly used in scientific/technical literature, while extrovert is common in non-technical usage.



From what I read, it seems that this is because in 1918 when the word extravert was becoming more popular and more commonly used outside of technical literature, non-technical people often misspelled it as extrovert because it was commonly paired with the word introvert.



Am I wrong if I choose to always (even in non-technical writing) spell it extravert because I think it is the correct spelling and that I think other people are spelling it incorrectly? Or does majority rule and am I wrong to not conform to the majority?



My question is more about the decision that I need to make (based on which alternative is right or wrong and why) than about this specific example of extrovert vs extravert. I've had similar experiences with other spelling and also grammar rule mismatches, so I'd like to be confident in my decisions in those other situations too.



-Does majority rule? Or are they technically wrong?



If majority does rule, at what point does a misspelling or a grammar error become correct? 50% saturation? 75%? Does the original simultaneously become incorrect at that point? For the example above, if extravert is incorrect to use in non-technical writing, at what point did it become incorrect? Because at one point it was the only way of spelling it, and was only pushed out of popular use by replication of the misspelled form.










share|improve this question















closed as primarily opinion-based by Jim, curiousdannii, Jason Bassford, kiamlaluno, Mitch Apr 5 at 19:01


Many good questions generate some degree of opinion based on expert experience, but answers to this question will tend to be almost entirely based on opinions, rather than facts, references, or specific expertise. If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.













  • 1





    If you’ve got a dictionary behind you- go for it.

    – Jim
    Mar 30 at 6:02











  • I'm not the OP, but I grabbed the nearest dictionary (Webster's New Collegiate 9th) and couldn't find anything about when a misspelling becomes correct or when the original correct spelling becomes incorrect. Is it somewhere in the pages of text in the front, about the history of the English language and dictionaries? I'm not gonna try and find it there with my weak eyes. More guidance, please. Thanks, @Jim

    – bof
    Mar 30 at 6:23











  • @bof I think Jim means that if I have the support of a dictionary that a particular spelling is acceptable then I should feel free to use that spelling however I wish. My issue is that the dictionary I checked shows extravert as correct only for technical usage, and extrovert as correct for popular/non-technical usage, so I don't really "have that dictionary behind me". However, the dictionary in my mind says extravert is always correct and extrovert is always incorrect, while the dictionary in this browser puts a red line under extravert, indicating that it is incorrect.

    – Gimme the 411
    Mar 30 at 6:38












  • A Scientific American blogger here says that in 1918 a certain Phyllis Blanchard wrote a paper in which she translated extravertierte as 'extroversion'. The blogger feels sure this was an error. He notes the modern scientific/popular split between the extra- and extro- usages and claims that the most vociferous champions of extro- are keen Jungians, whereas the extra- users are the present day personality scientists.

    – Michael Harvey
    Mar 30 at 7:56












  • Is it technically wrong to spell "rough" and "laugh" and "though" and "might" with the letters "gh"?

    – Mari-Lou A
    Mar 30 at 7:57













4












4








4


2






I saw the spelling extrovert in a text, but I intuitively felt that the correct spelling is extravert.



I did a little research and read that extravert is commonly used in scientific/technical literature, while extrovert is common in non-technical usage.



From what I read, it seems that this is because in 1918 when the word extravert was becoming more popular and more commonly used outside of technical literature, non-technical people often misspelled it as extrovert because it was commonly paired with the word introvert.



Am I wrong if I choose to always (even in non-technical writing) spell it extravert because I think it is the correct spelling and that I think other people are spelling it incorrectly? Or does majority rule and am I wrong to not conform to the majority?



My question is more about the decision that I need to make (based on which alternative is right or wrong and why) than about this specific example of extrovert vs extravert. I've had similar experiences with other spelling and also grammar rule mismatches, so I'd like to be confident in my decisions in those other situations too.



-Does majority rule? Or are they technically wrong?



If majority does rule, at what point does a misspelling or a grammar error become correct? 50% saturation? 75%? Does the original simultaneously become incorrect at that point? For the example above, if extravert is incorrect to use in non-technical writing, at what point did it become incorrect? Because at one point it was the only way of spelling it, and was only pushed out of popular use by replication of the misspelled form.










share|improve this question
















I saw the spelling extrovert in a text, but I intuitively felt that the correct spelling is extravert.



I did a little research and read that extravert is commonly used in scientific/technical literature, while extrovert is common in non-technical usage.



From what I read, it seems that this is because in 1918 when the word extravert was becoming more popular and more commonly used outside of technical literature, non-technical people often misspelled it as extrovert because it was commonly paired with the word introvert.



Am I wrong if I choose to always (even in non-technical writing) spell it extravert because I think it is the correct spelling and that I think other people are spelling it incorrectly? Or does majority rule and am I wrong to not conform to the majority?



My question is more about the decision that I need to make (based on which alternative is right or wrong and why) than about this specific example of extrovert vs extravert. I've had similar experiences with other spelling and also grammar rule mismatches, so I'd like to be confident in my decisions in those other situations too.



-Does majority rule? Or are they technically wrong?



If majority does rule, at what point does a misspelling or a grammar error become correct? 50% saturation? 75%? Does the original simultaneously become incorrect at that point? For the example above, if extravert is incorrect to use in non-technical writing, at what point did it become incorrect? Because at one point it was the only way of spelling it, and was only pushed out of popular use by replication of the misspelled form.







etymology pronunciation orthography






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited Mar 30 at 10:34







Gimme the 411

















asked Mar 30 at 5:00









Gimme the 411Gimme the 411

1406




1406




closed as primarily opinion-based by Jim, curiousdannii, Jason Bassford, kiamlaluno, Mitch Apr 5 at 19:01


Many good questions generate some degree of opinion based on expert experience, but answers to this question will tend to be almost entirely based on opinions, rather than facts, references, or specific expertise. If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.









closed as primarily opinion-based by Jim, curiousdannii, Jason Bassford, kiamlaluno, Mitch Apr 5 at 19:01


Many good questions generate some degree of opinion based on expert experience, but answers to this question will tend to be almost entirely based on opinions, rather than facts, references, or specific expertise. If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.









  • 1





    If you’ve got a dictionary behind you- go for it.

    – Jim
    Mar 30 at 6:02











  • I'm not the OP, but I grabbed the nearest dictionary (Webster's New Collegiate 9th) and couldn't find anything about when a misspelling becomes correct or when the original correct spelling becomes incorrect. Is it somewhere in the pages of text in the front, about the history of the English language and dictionaries? I'm not gonna try and find it there with my weak eyes. More guidance, please. Thanks, @Jim

    – bof
    Mar 30 at 6:23











  • @bof I think Jim means that if I have the support of a dictionary that a particular spelling is acceptable then I should feel free to use that spelling however I wish. My issue is that the dictionary I checked shows extravert as correct only for technical usage, and extrovert as correct for popular/non-technical usage, so I don't really "have that dictionary behind me". However, the dictionary in my mind says extravert is always correct and extrovert is always incorrect, while the dictionary in this browser puts a red line under extravert, indicating that it is incorrect.

    – Gimme the 411
    Mar 30 at 6:38












  • A Scientific American blogger here says that in 1918 a certain Phyllis Blanchard wrote a paper in which she translated extravertierte as 'extroversion'. The blogger feels sure this was an error. He notes the modern scientific/popular split between the extra- and extro- usages and claims that the most vociferous champions of extro- are keen Jungians, whereas the extra- users are the present day personality scientists.

    – Michael Harvey
    Mar 30 at 7:56












  • Is it technically wrong to spell "rough" and "laugh" and "though" and "might" with the letters "gh"?

    – Mari-Lou A
    Mar 30 at 7:57












  • 1





    If you’ve got a dictionary behind you- go for it.

    – Jim
    Mar 30 at 6:02











  • I'm not the OP, but I grabbed the nearest dictionary (Webster's New Collegiate 9th) and couldn't find anything about when a misspelling becomes correct or when the original correct spelling becomes incorrect. Is it somewhere in the pages of text in the front, about the history of the English language and dictionaries? I'm not gonna try and find it there with my weak eyes. More guidance, please. Thanks, @Jim

    – bof
    Mar 30 at 6:23











  • @bof I think Jim means that if I have the support of a dictionary that a particular spelling is acceptable then I should feel free to use that spelling however I wish. My issue is that the dictionary I checked shows extravert as correct only for technical usage, and extrovert as correct for popular/non-technical usage, so I don't really "have that dictionary behind me". However, the dictionary in my mind says extravert is always correct and extrovert is always incorrect, while the dictionary in this browser puts a red line under extravert, indicating that it is incorrect.

    – Gimme the 411
    Mar 30 at 6:38












  • A Scientific American blogger here says that in 1918 a certain Phyllis Blanchard wrote a paper in which she translated extravertierte as 'extroversion'. The blogger feels sure this was an error. He notes the modern scientific/popular split between the extra- and extro- usages and claims that the most vociferous champions of extro- are keen Jungians, whereas the extra- users are the present day personality scientists.

    – Michael Harvey
    Mar 30 at 7:56












  • Is it technically wrong to spell "rough" and "laugh" and "though" and "might" with the letters "gh"?

    – Mari-Lou A
    Mar 30 at 7:57







1




1





If you’ve got a dictionary behind you- go for it.

– Jim
Mar 30 at 6:02





If you’ve got a dictionary behind you- go for it.

– Jim
Mar 30 at 6:02













I'm not the OP, but I grabbed the nearest dictionary (Webster's New Collegiate 9th) and couldn't find anything about when a misspelling becomes correct or when the original correct spelling becomes incorrect. Is it somewhere in the pages of text in the front, about the history of the English language and dictionaries? I'm not gonna try and find it there with my weak eyes. More guidance, please. Thanks, @Jim

– bof
Mar 30 at 6:23





I'm not the OP, but I grabbed the nearest dictionary (Webster's New Collegiate 9th) and couldn't find anything about when a misspelling becomes correct or when the original correct spelling becomes incorrect. Is it somewhere in the pages of text in the front, about the history of the English language and dictionaries? I'm not gonna try and find it there with my weak eyes. More guidance, please. Thanks, @Jim

– bof
Mar 30 at 6:23













@bof I think Jim means that if I have the support of a dictionary that a particular spelling is acceptable then I should feel free to use that spelling however I wish. My issue is that the dictionary I checked shows extravert as correct only for technical usage, and extrovert as correct for popular/non-technical usage, so I don't really "have that dictionary behind me". However, the dictionary in my mind says extravert is always correct and extrovert is always incorrect, while the dictionary in this browser puts a red line under extravert, indicating that it is incorrect.

– Gimme the 411
Mar 30 at 6:38






@bof I think Jim means that if I have the support of a dictionary that a particular spelling is acceptable then I should feel free to use that spelling however I wish. My issue is that the dictionary I checked shows extravert as correct only for technical usage, and extrovert as correct for popular/non-technical usage, so I don't really "have that dictionary behind me". However, the dictionary in my mind says extravert is always correct and extrovert is always incorrect, while the dictionary in this browser puts a red line under extravert, indicating that it is incorrect.

– Gimme the 411
Mar 30 at 6:38














A Scientific American blogger here says that in 1918 a certain Phyllis Blanchard wrote a paper in which she translated extravertierte as 'extroversion'. The blogger feels sure this was an error. He notes the modern scientific/popular split between the extra- and extro- usages and claims that the most vociferous champions of extro- are keen Jungians, whereas the extra- users are the present day personality scientists.

– Michael Harvey
Mar 30 at 7:56






A Scientific American blogger here says that in 1918 a certain Phyllis Blanchard wrote a paper in which she translated extravertierte as 'extroversion'. The blogger feels sure this was an error. He notes the modern scientific/popular split between the extra- and extro- usages and claims that the most vociferous champions of extro- are keen Jungians, whereas the extra- users are the present day personality scientists.

– Michael Harvey
Mar 30 at 7:56














Is it technically wrong to spell "rough" and "laugh" and "though" and "might" with the letters "gh"?

– Mari-Lou A
Mar 30 at 7:57





Is it technically wrong to spell "rough" and "laugh" and "though" and "might" with the letters "gh"?

– Mari-Lou A
Mar 30 at 7:57










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















1














According to the Google Books
Ngram Viewer
,
the spelling with 'o' is preferable.



Though etymologically (according to EtymologyOnline) the word was spelt with 'a', the spelling was changed on analogy with 'introvert'.



So they (extrovert - introvert) make a good match.



I think this 100-year-old spelling doesn't need any change.
Otherwise we must have changed the spelling of such words as ISLAND, DEBT, ADMIRAL, etc.



The choice of the spelling variant depends on the user (like TRAVELER/TRAVELLER, CACTUSES/ CACTI, etc.)






share|improve this answer

























  • Thanks, this is much better.

    – Lordology
    Mar 31 at 10:41

















1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









1














According to the Google Books
Ngram Viewer
,
the spelling with 'o' is preferable.



Though etymologically (according to EtymologyOnline) the word was spelt with 'a', the spelling was changed on analogy with 'introvert'.



So they (extrovert - introvert) make a good match.



I think this 100-year-old spelling doesn't need any change.
Otherwise we must have changed the spelling of such words as ISLAND, DEBT, ADMIRAL, etc.



The choice of the spelling variant depends on the user (like TRAVELER/TRAVELLER, CACTUSES/ CACTI, etc.)






share|improve this answer

























  • Thanks, this is much better.

    – Lordology
    Mar 31 at 10:41















1














According to the Google Books
Ngram Viewer
,
the spelling with 'o' is preferable.



Though etymologically (according to EtymologyOnline) the word was spelt with 'a', the spelling was changed on analogy with 'introvert'.



So they (extrovert - introvert) make a good match.



I think this 100-year-old spelling doesn't need any change.
Otherwise we must have changed the spelling of such words as ISLAND, DEBT, ADMIRAL, etc.



The choice of the spelling variant depends on the user (like TRAVELER/TRAVELLER, CACTUSES/ CACTI, etc.)






share|improve this answer

























  • Thanks, this is much better.

    – Lordology
    Mar 31 at 10:41













1












1








1







According to the Google Books
Ngram Viewer
,
the spelling with 'o' is preferable.



Though etymologically (according to EtymologyOnline) the word was spelt with 'a', the spelling was changed on analogy with 'introvert'.



So they (extrovert - introvert) make a good match.



I think this 100-year-old spelling doesn't need any change.
Otherwise we must have changed the spelling of such words as ISLAND, DEBT, ADMIRAL, etc.



The choice of the spelling variant depends on the user (like TRAVELER/TRAVELLER, CACTUSES/ CACTI, etc.)






share|improve this answer















According to the Google Books
Ngram Viewer
,
the spelling with 'o' is preferable.



Though etymologically (according to EtymologyOnline) the word was spelt with 'a', the spelling was changed on analogy with 'introvert'.



So they (extrovert - introvert) make a good match.



I think this 100-year-old spelling doesn't need any change.
Otherwise we must have changed the spelling of such words as ISLAND, DEBT, ADMIRAL, etc.



The choice of the spelling variant depends on the user (like TRAVELER/TRAVELLER, CACTUSES/ CACTI, etc.)







share|improve this answer














share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer








edited Mar 31 at 12:54









Lordology

1,553217




1,553217










answered Mar 30 at 8:41









user307254user307254

1




1












  • Thanks, this is much better.

    – Lordology
    Mar 31 at 10:41

















  • Thanks, this is much better.

    – Lordology
    Mar 31 at 10:41
















Thanks, this is much better.

– Lordology
Mar 31 at 10:41





Thanks, this is much better.

– Lordology
Mar 31 at 10:41



Popular posts from this blog

Bruad Bilen | Luke uk diar | NawigatsjuunCommonskategorii: BruadCommonskategorii: RunstükenWikiquote: Bruad

What is the offset in a seaplane's hull?

Slayer Innehåll Historia | Stil, komposition och lyrik | Bandets betydelse och framgångar | Sidoprojekt och samarbeten | Kontroverser | Medlemmar | Utmärkelser och nomineringar | Turnéer och festivaler | Diskografi | Referenser | Externa länkar | Navigeringsmenywww.slayer.net”Metal Massacre vol. 1””Metal Massacre vol. 3””Metal Massacre Volume III””Show No Mercy””Haunting the Chapel””Live Undead””Hell Awaits””Reign in Blood””Reign in Blood””Gold & Platinum – Reign in Blood””Golden Gods Awards Winners”originalet”Kerrang! Hall Of Fame””Slayer Looks Back On 37-Year Career In New Video Series: Part Two””South of Heaven””Gold & Platinum – South of Heaven””Seasons in the Abyss””Gold & Platinum - Seasons in the Abyss””Divine Intervention””Divine Intervention - Release group by Slayer””Gold & Platinum - Divine Intervention””Live Intrusion””Undisputed Attitude””Abolish Government/Superficial Love””Release “Slatanic Slaughter: A Tribute to Slayer” by Various Artists””Diabolus in Musica””Soundtrack to the Apocalypse””God Hates Us All””Systematic - Relationships””War at the Warfield””Gold & Platinum - War at the Warfield””Soundtrack to the Apocalypse””Gold & Platinum - Still Reigning””Metallica, Slayer, Iron Mauden Among Winners At Metal Hammer Awards””Eternal Pyre””Eternal Pyre - Slayer release group””Eternal Pyre””Metal Storm Awards 2006””Kerrang! Hall Of Fame””Slayer Wins 'Best Metal' Grammy Award””Slayer Guitarist Jeff Hanneman Dies””Bullet-For My Valentine booed at Metal Hammer Golden Gods Awards””Unholy Aliance””The End Of Slayer?””Slayer: We Could Thrash Out Two More Albums If We're Fast Enough...””'The Unholy Alliance: Chapter III' UK Dates Added”originalet”Megadeth And Slayer To Co-Headline 'Canadian Carnage' Trek”originalet”World Painted Blood””Release “World Painted Blood” by Slayer””Metallica Heading To Cinemas””Slayer, Megadeth To Join Forces For 'European Carnage' Tour - Dec. 18, 2010”originalet”Slayer's Hanneman Contracts Acute Infection; Band To Bring In Guest Guitarist””Cannibal Corpse's Pat O'Brien Will Step In As Slayer's Guest Guitarist”originalet”Slayer’s Jeff Hanneman Dead at 49””Dave Lombardo Says He Made Only $67,000 In 2011 While Touring With Slayer””Slayer: We Do Not Agree With Dave Lombardo's Substance Or Timeline Of Events””Slayer Welcomes Drummer Paul Bostaph Back To The Fold””Slayer Hope to Unveil Never-Before-Heard Jeff Hanneman Material on Next Album””Slayer Debut New Song 'Implode' During Surprise Golden Gods Appearance””Release group Repentless by Slayer””Repentless - Slayer - Credits””Slayer””Metal Storm Awards 2015””Slayer - to release comic book "Repentless #1"””Slayer To Release 'Repentless' 6.66" Vinyl Box Set””BREAKING NEWS: Slayer Announce Farewell Tour””Slayer Recruit Lamb of God, Anthrax, Behemoth + Testament for Final Tour””Slayer lägger ner efter 37 år””Slayer Announces Second North American Leg Of 'Final' Tour””Final World Tour””Slayer Announces Final European Tour With Lamb of God, Anthrax And Obituary””Slayer To Tour Europe With Lamb of God, Anthrax And Obituary””Slayer To Play 'Last French Show Ever' At Next Year's Hellfst””Slayer's Final World Tour Will Extend Into 2019””Death Angel's Rob Cavestany On Slayer's 'Farewell' Tour: 'Some Of Us Could See This Coming'””Testament Has No Plans To Retire Anytime Soon, Says Chuck Billy””Anthrax's Scott Ian On Slayer's 'Farewell' Tour Plans: 'I Was Surprised And I Wasn't Surprised'””Slayer””Slayer's Morbid Schlock””Review/Rock; For Slayer, the Mania Is the Message””Slayer - Biography””Slayer - Reign In Blood”originalet”Dave Lombardo””An exclusive oral history of Slayer”originalet”Exclusive! Interview With Slayer Guitarist Jeff Hanneman”originalet”Thinking Out Loud: Slayer's Kerry King on hair metal, Satan and being polite””Slayer Lyrics””Slayer - Biography””Most influential artists for extreme metal music””Slayer - Reign in Blood””Slayer guitarist Jeff Hanneman dies aged 49””Slatanic Slaughter: A Tribute to Slayer””Gateway to Hell: A Tribute to Slayer””Covered In Blood””Slayer: The Origins of Thrash in San Francisco, CA.””Why They Rule - #6 Slayer”originalet”Guitar World's 100 Greatest Heavy Metal Guitarists Of All Time”originalet”The fans have spoken: Slayer comes out on top in readers' polls”originalet”Tribute to Jeff Hanneman (1964-2013)””Lamb Of God Frontman: We Sound Like A Slayer Rip-Off””BEHEMOTH Frontman Pays Tribute To SLAYER's JEFF HANNEMAN””Slayer, Hatebreed Doing Double Duty On This Year's Ozzfest””System of a Down””Lacuna Coil’s Andrea Ferro Talks Influences, Skateboarding, Band Origins + More””Slayer - Reign in Blood””Into The Lungs of Hell””Slayer rules - en utställning om fans””Slayer and Their Fans Slashed Through a No-Holds-Barred Night at Gas Monkey””Home””Slayer””Gold & Platinum - The Big 4 Live from Sofia, Bulgaria””Exclusive! Interview With Slayer Guitarist Kerry King””2008-02-23: Wiltern, Los Angeles, CA, USA””Slayer's Kerry King To Perform With Megadeth Tonight! - Oct. 21, 2010”originalet”Dave Lombardo - Biography”Slayer Case DismissedArkiveradUltimate Classic Rock: Slayer guitarist Jeff Hanneman dead at 49.”Slayer: "We could never do any thing like Some Kind Of Monster..."””Cannibal Corpse'S Pat O'Brien Will Step In As Slayer'S Guest Guitarist | The Official Slayer Site”originalet”Slayer Wins 'Best Metal' Grammy Award””Slayer Guitarist Jeff Hanneman Dies””Kerrang! Awards 2006 Blog: Kerrang! Hall Of Fame””Kerrang! Awards 2013: Kerrang! Legend”originalet”Metallica, Slayer, Iron Maien Among Winners At Metal Hammer Awards””Metal Hammer Golden Gods Awards””Bullet For My Valentine Booed At Metal Hammer Golden Gods Awards””Metal Storm Awards 2006””Metal Storm Awards 2015””Slayer's Concert History””Slayer - Relationships””Slayer - Releases”Slayers officiella webbplatsSlayer på MusicBrainzOfficiell webbplatsSlayerSlayerr1373445760000 0001 1540 47353068615-5086262726cb13906545x(data)6033143kn20030215029