“No one is born hating…” vs. “No one is born to hate…”
“No one is born hating another person because of the color of his
skin, or his background, or his religion. People must learn to hate,
and if they can learn to hate, they can be taught to love, for love
comes more naturally to the human heart than its opposite.”
Source: Nelson Mandela, Long Walk to Freedom
Why can't it be "No one is born to hate another…"?
meaning differences infinitives
New contributor
add a comment |
“No one is born hating another person because of the color of his
skin, or his background, or his religion. People must learn to hate,
and if they can learn to hate, they can be taught to love, for love
comes more naturally to the human heart than its opposite.”
Source: Nelson Mandela, Long Walk to Freedom
Why can't it be "No one is born to hate another…"?
meaning differences infinitives
New contributor
It can be. This is English -- there's no rule that there can be only one way to express a thought. But note that there are subtle differences in meaning between the two options.
– Hot Licks
Mar 19 at 17:03
But will there be a change in meaning?
– Kaushik
Mar 19 at 17:03
Yes, a subtle change in meaning. See the answer by @Ian MacDonald. In English "born to X" is used idiomatically to state a purpose or destiny for someones life and is not necessarily literal. Saying the baby is not born hating means that hating needs to be learned.
– Damila
Mar 19 at 17:44
add a comment |
“No one is born hating another person because of the color of his
skin, or his background, or his religion. People must learn to hate,
and if they can learn to hate, they can be taught to love, for love
comes more naturally to the human heart than its opposite.”
Source: Nelson Mandela, Long Walk to Freedom
Why can't it be "No one is born to hate another…"?
meaning differences infinitives
New contributor
“No one is born hating another person because of the color of his
skin, or his background, or his religion. People must learn to hate,
and if they can learn to hate, they can be taught to love, for love
comes more naturally to the human heart than its opposite.”
Source: Nelson Mandela, Long Walk to Freedom
Why can't it be "No one is born to hate another…"?
meaning differences infinitives
meaning differences infinitives
New contributor
New contributor
edited yesterday
Mari-Lou A
62.4k56222462
62.4k56222462
New contributor
asked Mar 19 at 16:58
KaushikKaushik
418
418
New contributor
New contributor
It can be. This is English -- there's no rule that there can be only one way to express a thought. But note that there are subtle differences in meaning between the two options.
– Hot Licks
Mar 19 at 17:03
But will there be a change in meaning?
– Kaushik
Mar 19 at 17:03
Yes, a subtle change in meaning. See the answer by @Ian MacDonald. In English "born to X" is used idiomatically to state a purpose or destiny for someones life and is not necessarily literal. Saying the baby is not born hating means that hating needs to be learned.
– Damila
Mar 19 at 17:44
add a comment |
It can be. This is English -- there's no rule that there can be only one way to express a thought. But note that there are subtle differences in meaning between the two options.
– Hot Licks
Mar 19 at 17:03
But will there be a change in meaning?
– Kaushik
Mar 19 at 17:03
Yes, a subtle change in meaning. See the answer by @Ian MacDonald. In English "born to X" is used idiomatically to state a purpose or destiny for someones life and is not necessarily literal. Saying the baby is not born hating means that hating needs to be learned.
– Damila
Mar 19 at 17:44
It can be. This is English -- there's no rule that there can be only one way to express a thought. But note that there are subtle differences in meaning between the two options.
– Hot Licks
Mar 19 at 17:03
It can be. This is English -- there's no rule that there can be only one way to express a thought. But note that there are subtle differences in meaning between the two options.
– Hot Licks
Mar 19 at 17:03
But will there be a change in meaning?
– Kaushik
Mar 19 at 17:03
But will there be a change in meaning?
– Kaushik
Mar 19 at 17:03
Yes, a subtle change in meaning. See the answer by @Ian MacDonald. In English "born to X" is used idiomatically to state a purpose or destiny for someones life and is not necessarily literal. Saying the baby is not born hating means that hating needs to be learned.
– Damila
Mar 19 at 17:44
Yes, a subtle change in meaning. See the answer by @Ian MacDonald. In English "born to X" is used idiomatically to state a purpose or destiny for someones life and is not necessarily literal. Saying the baby is not born hating means that hating needs to be learned.
– Damila
Mar 19 at 17:44
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
There's nothing stopping it from being as you write, but the words were chosen by Nelson Mandela to evoke a certain meaning. Here, he evokes a state of being. A newborn acting as soon as it is born. Had he chosen "to hate", then there is less finality to the statement.
Consider:
This baby was born to hate.
This baby will hate at some point in the future.
vs
This baby was born hating.
This baby is actively hating from the moment of birth.
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "97"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Kaushik is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fenglish.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f490423%2fno-one-is-born-hating-vs-no-one-is-born-to-hate%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
There's nothing stopping it from being as you write, but the words were chosen by Nelson Mandela to evoke a certain meaning. Here, he evokes a state of being. A newborn acting as soon as it is born. Had he chosen "to hate", then there is less finality to the statement.
Consider:
This baby was born to hate.
This baby will hate at some point in the future.
vs
This baby was born hating.
This baby is actively hating from the moment of birth.
add a comment |
There's nothing stopping it from being as you write, but the words were chosen by Nelson Mandela to evoke a certain meaning. Here, he evokes a state of being. A newborn acting as soon as it is born. Had he chosen "to hate", then there is less finality to the statement.
Consider:
This baby was born to hate.
This baby will hate at some point in the future.
vs
This baby was born hating.
This baby is actively hating from the moment of birth.
add a comment |
There's nothing stopping it from being as you write, but the words were chosen by Nelson Mandela to evoke a certain meaning. Here, he evokes a state of being. A newborn acting as soon as it is born. Had he chosen "to hate", then there is less finality to the statement.
Consider:
This baby was born to hate.
This baby will hate at some point in the future.
vs
This baby was born hating.
This baby is actively hating from the moment of birth.
There's nothing stopping it from being as you write, but the words were chosen by Nelson Mandela to evoke a certain meaning. Here, he evokes a state of being. A newborn acting as soon as it is born. Had he chosen "to hate", then there is less finality to the statement.
Consider:
This baby was born to hate.
This baby will hate at some point in the future.
vs
This baby was born hating.
This baby is actively hating from the moment of birth.
answered Mar 19 at 17:04
Ian MacDonaldIan MacDonald
3,0211017
3,0211017
add a comment |
add a comment |
Kaushik is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Kaushik is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Kaushik is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Kaushik is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Thanks for contributing an answer to English Language & Usage Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fenglish.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f490423%2fno-one-is-born-hating-vs-no-one-is-born-to-hate%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
It can be. This is English -- there's no rule that there can be only one way to express a thought. But note that there are subtle differences in meaning between the two options.
– Hot Licks
Mar 19 at 17:03
But will there be a change in meaning?
– Kaushik
Mar 19 at 17:03
Yes, a subtle change in meaning. See the answer by @Ian MacDonald. In English "born to X" is used idiomatically to state a purpose or destiny for someones life and is not necessarily literal. Saying the baby is not born hating means that hating needs to be learned.
– Damila
Mar 19 at 17:44