Why aren't degree modifiers complements?












0















As far as I've been able to figure out, in the CaGEL* framework, complements are items that are licensed by some other element (generally the head), so that if an item has to be licensed, it is per definition a complement. But if I've got this right, then how come degree modifiers aren't complements? I mean, they elaborate on a feature that is only found with a subgroup of heads, just like any complement?



*Huddleston, R., and Pullum, G. K., 2002. The Cambridge Grammar of the English Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.










share|improve this question























  • That is very weird. Are you saying that very is a complement of weird because weird is a matter of degree and thus licenses very? Aren't complements required not merely licensed?

    – TRomano
    Mar 17 at 10:54













  • No, a degree modifier like "very" can occur with many adjectives. Complements, by definition, can be required or permitted.

    – BillJ
    Mar 17 at 11:06








  • 1





    A small request: In its index the CGEL has several entries for degree modification and even more for complement. It would be helpful (at least for indolent CGEL users such as me) if you could tell us the page(s) you are referring to.

    – Shoe
    Mar 17 at 11:06











  • @TRomano Well, I'm not saying it is, since I know it isn't – I'm asking why it isn't, considering the definition of complements as something that is licensed by a subgroup of heads only. And no, as far as I've understood it, complements aren't necessarily required.

    – Hannah
    Mar 18 at 7:43











  • @BillJ with many, yes, but far from all. So I don't quite see the difference really between a feature of degree, which is limited to a subgroup of heads, and a feature of, say 'goal', as found with goal complements, found with a subgroup of verbs.

    – Hannah
    Mar 18 at 7:45


















0















As far as I've been able to figure out, in the CaGEL* framework, complements are items that are licensed by some other element (generally the head), so that if an item has to be licensed, it is per definition a complement. But if I've got this right, then how come degree modifiers aren't complements? I mean, they elaborate on a feature that is only found with a subgroup of heads, just like any complement?



*Huddleston, R., and Pullum, G. K., 2002. The Cambridge Grammar of the English Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.










share|improve this question























  • That is very weird. Are you saying that very is a complement of weird because weird is a matter of degree and thus licenses very? Aren't complements required not merely licensed?

    – TRomano
    Mar 17 at 10:54













  • No, a degree modifier like "very" can occur with many adjectives. Complements, by definition, can be required or permitted.

    – BillJ
    Mar 17 at 11:06








  • 1





    A small request: In its index the CGEL has several entries for degree modification and even more for complement. It would be helpful (at least for indolent CGEL users such as me) if you could tell us the page(s) you are referring to.

    – Shoe
    Mar 17 at 11:06











  • @TRomano Well, I'm not saying it is, since I know it isn't – I'm asking why it isn't, considering the definition of complements as something that is licensed by a subgroup of heads only. And no, as far as I've understood it, complements aren't necessarily required.

    – Hannah
    Mar 18 at 7:43











  • @BillJ with many, yes, but far from all. So I don't quite see the difference really between a feature of degree, which is limited to a subgroup of heads, and a feature of, say 'goal', as found with goal complements, found with a subgroup of verbs.

    – Hannah
    Mar 18 at 7:45
















0












0








0








As far as I've been able to figure out, in the CaGEL* framework, complements are items that are licensed by some other element (generally the head), so that if an item has to be licensed, it is per definition a complement. But if I've got this right, then how come degree modifiers aren't complements? I mean, they elaborate on a feature that is only found with a subgroup of heads, just like any complement?



*Huddleston, R., and Pullum, G. K., 2002. The Cambridge Grammar of the English Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.










share|improve this question














As far as I've been able to figure out, in the CaGEL* framework, complements are items that are licensed by some other element (generally the head), so that if an item has to be licensed, it is per definition a complement. But if I've got this right, then how come degree modifiers aren't complements? I mean, they elaborate on a feature that is only found with a subgroup of heads, just like any complement?



*Huddleston, R., and Pullum, G. K., 2002. The Cambridge Grammar of the English Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.







grammar modifiers complements parsing






share|improve this question













share|improve this question











share|improve this question




share|improve this question










asked Mar 17 at 10:15









HannahHannah

19110




19110













  • That is very weird. Are you saying that very is a complement of weird because weird is a matter of degree and thus licenses very? Aren't complements required not merely licensed?

    – TRomano
    Mar 17 at 10:54













  • No, a degree modifier like "very" can occur with many adjectives. Complements, by definition, can be required or permitted.

    – BillJ
    Mar 17 at 11:06








  • 1





    A small request: In its index the CGEL has several entries for degree modification and even more for complement. It would be helpful (at least for indolent CGEL users such as me) if you could tell us the page(s) you are referring to.

    – Shoe
    Mar 17 at 11:06











  • @TRomano Well, I'm not saying it is, since I know it isn't – I'm asking why it isn't, considering the definition of complements as something that is licensed by a subgroup of heads only. And no, as far as I've understood it, complements aren't necessarily required.

    – Hannah
    Mar 18 at 7:43











  • @BillJ with many, yes, but far from all. So I don't quite see the difference really between a feature of degree, which is limited to a subgroup of heads, and a feature of, say 'goal', as found with goal complements, found with a subgroup of verbs.

    – Hannah
    Mar 18 at 7:45





















  • That is very weird. Are you saying that very is a complement of weird because weird is a matter of degree and thus licenses very? Aren't complements required not merely licensed?

    – TRomano
    Mar 17 at 10:54













  • No, a degree modifier like "very" can occur with many adjectives. Complements, by definition, can be required or permitted.

    – BillJ
    Mar 17 at 11:06








  • 1





    A small request: In its index the CGEL has several entries for degree modification and even more for complement. It would be helpful (at least for indolent CGEL users such as me) if you could tell us the page(s) you are referring to.

    – Shoe
    Mar 17 at 11:06











  • @TRomano Well, I'm not saying it is, since I know it isn't – I'm asking why it isn't, considering the definition of complements as something that is licensed by a subgroup of heads only. And no, as far as I've understood it, complements aren't necessarily required.

    – Hannah
    Mar 18 at 7:43











  • @BillJ with many, yes, but far from all. So I don't quite see the difference really between a feature of degree, which is limited to a subgroup of heads, and a feature of, say 'goal', as found with goal complements, found with a subgroup of verbs.

    – Hannah
    Mar 18 at 7:45



















That is very weird. Are you saying that very is a complement of weird because weird is a matter of degree and thus licenses very? Aren't complements required not merely licensed?

– TRomano
Mar 17 at 10:54







That is very weird. Are you saying that very is a complement of weird because weird is a matter of degree and thus licenses very? Aren't complements required not merely licensed?

– TRomano
Mar 17 at 10:54















No, a degree modifier like "very" can occur with many adjectives. Complements, by definition, can be required or permitted.

– BillJ
Mar 17 at 11:06







No, a degree modifier like "very" can occur with many adjectives. Complements, by definition, can be required or permitted.

– BillJ
Mar 17 at 11:06






1




1





A small request: In its index the CGEL has several entries for degree modification and even more for complement. It would be helpful (at least for indolent CGEL users such as me) if you could tell us the page(s) you are referring to.

– Shoe
Mar 17 at 11:06





A small request: In its index the CGEL has several entries for degree modification and even more for complement. It would be helpful (at least for indolent CGEL users such as me) if you could tell us the page(s) you are referring to.

– Shoe
Mar 17 at 11:06













@TRomano Well, I'm not saying it is, since I know it isn't – I'm asking why it isn't, considering the definition of complements as something that is licensed by a subgroup of heads only. And no, as far as I've understood it, complements aren't necessarily required.

– Hannah
Mar 18 at 7:43





@TRomano Well, I'm not saying it is, since I know it isn't – I'm asking why it isn't, considering the definition of complements as something that is licensed by a subgroup of heads only. And no, as far as I've understood it, complements aren't necessarily required.

– Hannah
Mar 18 at 7:43













@BillJ with many, yes, but far from all. So I don't quite see the difference really between a feature of degree, which is limited to a subgroup of heads, and a feature of, say 'goal', as found with goal complements, found with a subgroup of verbs.

– Hannah
Mar 18 at 7:45







@BillJ with many, yes, but far from all. So I don't quite see the difference really between a feature of degree, which is limited to a subgroup of heads, and a feature of, say 'goal', as found with goal complements, found with a subgroup of verbs.

– Hannah
Mar 18 at 7:45












0






active

oldest

votes











Your Answer








StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "97"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fenglish.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f490072%2fwhy-arent-degree-modifiers-complements%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























0






active

oldest

votes








0






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes
















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to English Language & Usage Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fenglish.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f490072%2fwhy-arent-degree-modifiers-complements%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Færeyskur hestur Heimild | Tengill | Tilvísanir | LeiðsagnarvalRossið - síða um færeyska hrossið á færeyskuGott ár hjá færeyska hestinum

He _____ here since 1970 . Answer needed [closed]What does “since he was so high” mean?Meaning of “catch birds for”?How do I ensure “since” takes the meaning I want?“Who cares here” meaningWhat does “right round toward” mean?the time tense (had now been detected)What does the phrase “ring around the roses” mean here?Correct usage of “visited upon”Meaning of “foiled rail sabotage bid”It was the third time I had gone to Rome or It is the third time I had been to Rome

Bunad