Simplify an interface for flexibly applying rules to periods of timeBest practices for selecting timeUser Interface for assigning times throughout the dayGood metaphor for time estimation vs. spent timeBuilding logical criteria (with AND , OR, etc)Is there a pattern for cycling or toggling through time periods?Approaches for setting a time periodDisplaying time spans - do you show both periods? What about past 12:00?Clock face interface for time selectionGraphical alternatives to mini-language to operate on large setsHow to handle time input for different time zones?

Why doesn't the fusion process of the sun speed up?

When did hardware antialiasing start being available?

Why is participating in the European Parliamentary elections used as a threat?

Have the tides ever turned twice on any open problem?

Help with identifying unique aircraft over NE Pa

How do you balance your desire for liberation with your wordly desires?

What kind of footwear is suitable for walking in micro gravity environment?

What is the tangent at a sharp point on a curve?

What is it called when someone votes for an option that's not their first choice?

Writing in a Christian voice

Homology of the fiber

How do researchers send unsolicited emails asking for feedback on their works?

Would this string work as string?

Don't understand why (5 | -2) > 0 is False where (5 or -2) > 0 is True

What is the difference between something being completely legal and being completely decriminalized?

Mishloach Manot - why the word Mishloach is used specifically

How can "telecommuting" mean "to not commute or travel"?

Will mining huge amounts of resources on the Moon change its orbit?

Can other pieces capture a threatening piece and prevent a checkmate?

How to balance a monster modification (zombie)?

Why is "la Gestapo" feminine?

Acquisition - what happens to stock?

PTIJ: Which Dr. Seuss books should one obtain?

Unfrosted light bulb



Simplify an interface for flexibly applying rules to periods of time


Best practices for selecting timeUser Interface for assigning times throughout the dayGood metaphor for time estimation vs. spent timeBuilding logical criteria (with AND , OR, etc)Is there a pattern for cycling or toggling through time periods?Approaches for setting a time periodDisplaying time spans - do you show both periods? What about past 12:00?Clock face interface for time selectionGraphical alternatives to mini-language to operate on large setsHow to handle time input for different time zones?













14















We have a module in an application where users define time periods for different criteria that will be used later to filter some lists.



By default each criterion applies any time. Its validity can be limited by both restricting the time periods where it applies, and adding exclusion time periods. Already-defined periods of applying and excluding can be edited or deleted.



The current interface is as follow:





mockup





download bmml source – Wireframes created with Balsamiq Mockups



Users find it difficult to understand the logic of "application" vs "exclusion" time periods, which I totally understand.
I can't find a solution to simplify the interface while keeping all the existing possibilities.



What can be done to improve the user's experience here?










share|improve this question



















  • 2





    what is the smallest and largest units of time here? How small can an exception be to a restriction?

    – Mike M
    Mar 14 at 13:36






  • 1





    ah okay, see my answer, i would say then you wouldn't have the 'gray' area in between it sounds like.

    – Mike M
    Mar 14 at 14:24






  • 1





    I can't edited only two characters due to low rep, but the singular of criteria is criterion.

    – henning
    Mar 14 at 17:16






  • 1





    Submitting a comment since you mentioned keeping functionality. Having "application" vs. "exclusion" doesn't seem helpful conceptually or for data entry. For example, in your criteria 3, the user must enter two date ranges (4 dates). So why not just enter the two date ranges for application: 2019/1/1 through 2019-7-14, and 2019-8-15 through 2019-12-31? If you have one range of "application" with 2 periods of "exception", this is the same thing as 3 ranges of "application." Either way, the user still has to enter 6 dates. What does the application vs. exception distinction buy you?

    – Randall Stewart
    Mar 14 at 17:26






  • 2





    What purpose do these exceptions serve? Why is it preferred to input "Applies from 2019-01-01 to 2019-12-31, except from 2019-07-14 to 2019-08-15" and not simply "Applies from 2019-01-01 to 2019-07-14 and 2019-08-15 to 2019-12-31". Same functionality, but you reduce the available inputs a lot.

    – Polygnome
    Mar 15 at 0:06
















14















We have a module in an application where users define time periods for different criteria that will be used later to filter some lists.



By default each criterion applies any time. Its validity can be limited by both restricting the time periods where it applies, and adding exclusion time periods. Already-defined periods of applying and excluding can be edited or deleted.



The current interface is as follow:





mockup





download bmml source – Wireframes created with Balsamiq Mockups



Users find it difficult to understand the logic of "application" vs "exclusion" time periods, which I totally understand.
I can't find a solution to simplify the interface while keeping all the existing possibilities.



What can be done to improve the user's experience here?










share|improve this question



















  • 2





    what is the smallest and largest units of time here? How small can an exception be to a restriction?

    – Mike M
    Mar 14 at 13:36






  • 1





    ah okay, see my answer, i would say then you wouldn't have the 'gray' area in between it sounds like.

    – Mike M
    Mar 14 at 14:24






  • 1





    I can't edited only two characters due to low rep, but the singular of criteria is criterion.

    – henning
    Mar 14 at 17:16






  • 1





    Submitting a comment since you mentioned keeping functionality. Having "application" vs. "exclusion" doesn't seem helpful conceptually or for data entry. For example, in your criteria 3, the user must enter two date ranges (4 dates). So why not just enter the two date ranges for application: 2019/1/1 through 2019-7-14, and 2019-8-15 through 2019-12-31? If you have one range of "application" with 2 periods of "exception", this is the same thing as 3 ranges of "application." Either way, the user still has to enter 6 dates. What does the application vs. exception distinction buy you?

    – Randall Stewart
    Mar 14 at 17:26






  • 2





    What purpose do these exceptions serve? Why is it preferred to input "Applies from 2019-01-01 to 2019-12-31, except from 2019-07-14 to 2019-08-15" and not simply "Applies from 2019-01-01 to 2019-07-14 and 2019-08-15 to 2019-12-31". Same functionality, but you reduce the available inputs a lot.

    – Polygnome
    Mar 15 at 0:06














14












14








14


4






We have a module in an application where users define time periods for different criteria that will be used later to filter some lists.



By default each criterion applies any time. Its validity can be limited by both restricting the time periods where it applies, and adding exclusion time periods. Already-defined periods of applying and excluding can be edited or deleted.



The current interface is as follow:





mockup





download bmml source – Wireframes created with Balsamiq Mockups



Users find it difficult to understand the logic of "application" vs "exclusion" time periods, which I totally understand.
I can't find a solution to simplify the interface while keeping all the existing possibilities.



What can be done to improve the user's experience here?










share|improve this question
















We have a module in an application where users define time periods for different criteria that will be used later to filter some lists.



By default each criterion applies any time. Its validity can be limited by both restricting the time periods where it applies, and adding exclusion time periods. Already-defined periods of applying and excluding can be edited or deleted.



The current interface is as follow:





mockup





download bmml source – Wireframes created with Balsamiq Mockups



Users find it difficult to understand the logic of "application" vs "exclusion" time periods, which I totally understand.
I can't find a solution to simplify the interface while keeping all the existing possibilities.



What can be done to improve the user's experience here?







usability gui-design time simplicity






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited yesterday









Community

1




1










asked Mar 14 at 13:16









Yannick BlondeauYannick Blondeau

1,25521322




1,25521322







  • 2





    what is the smallest and largest units of time here? How small can an exception be to a restriction?

    – Mike M
    Mar 14 at 13:36






  • 1





    ah okay, see my answer, i would say then you wouldn't have the 'gray' area in between it sounds like.

    – Mike M
    Mar 14 at 14:24






  • 1





    I can't edited only two characters due to low rep, but the singular of criteria is criterion.

    – henning
    Mar 14 at 17:16






  • 1





    Submitting a comment since you mentioned keeping functionality. Having "application" vs. "exclusion" doesn't seem helpful conceptually or for data entry. For example, in your criteria 3, the user must enter two date ranges (4 dates). So why not just enter the two date ranges for application: 2019/1/1 through 2019-7-14, and 2019-8-15 through 2019-12-31? If you have one range of "application" with 2 periods of "exception", this is the same thing as 3 ranges of "application." Either way, the user still has to enter 6 dates. What does the application vs. exception distinction buy you?

    – Randall Stewart
    Mar 14 at 17:26






  • 2





    What purpose do these exceptions serve? Why is it preferred to input "Applies from 2019-01-01 to 2019-12-31, except from 2019-07-14 to 2019-08-15" and not simply "Applies from 2019-01-01 to 2019-07-14 and 2019-08-15 to 2019-12-31". Same functionality, but you reduce the available inputs a lot.

    – Polygnome
    Mar 15 at 0:06













  • 2





    what is the smallest and largest units of time here? How small can an exception be to a restriction?

    – Mike M
    Mar 14 at 13:36






  • 1





    ah okay, see my answer, i would say then you wouldn't have the 'gray' area in between it sounds like.

    – Mike M
    Mar 14 at 14:24






  • 1





    I can't edited only two characters due to low rep, but the singular of criteria is criterion.

    – henning
    Mar 14 at 17:16






  • 1





    Submitting a comment since you mentioned keeping functionality. Having "application" vs. "exclusion" doesn't seem helpful conceptually or for data entry. For example, in your criteria 3, the user must enter two date ranges (4 dates). So why not just enter the two date ranges for application: 2019/1/1 through 2019-7-14, and 2019-8-15 through 2019-12-31? If you have one range of "application" with 2 periods of "exception", this is the same thing as 3 ranges of "application." Either way, the user still has to enter 6 dates. What does the application vs. exception distinction buy you?

    – Randall Stewart
    Mar 14 at 17:26






  • 2





    What purpose do these exceptions serve? Why is it preferred to input "Applies from 2019-01-01 to 2019-12-31, except from 2019-07-14 to 2019-08-15" and not simply "Applies from 2019-01-01 to 2019-07-14 and 2019-08-15 to 2019-12-31". Same functionality, but you reduce the available inputs a lot.

    – Polygnome
    Mar 15 at 0:06








2




2





what is the smallest and largest units of time here? How small can an exception be to a restriction?

– Mike M
Mar 14 at 13:36





what is the smallest and largest units of time here? How small can an exception be to a restriction?

– Mike M
Mar 14 at 13:36




1




1





ah okay, see my answer, i would say then you wouldn't have the 'gray' area in between it sounds like.

– Mike M
Mar 14 at 14:24





ah okay, see my answer, i would say then you wouldn't have the 'gray' area in between it sounds like.

– Mike M
Mar 14 at 14:24




1




1





I can't edited only two characters due to low rep, but the singular of criteria is criterion.

– henning
Mar 14 at 17:16





I can't edited only two characters due to low rep, but the singular of criteria is criterion.

– henning
Mar 14 at 17:16




1




1





Submitting a comment since you mentioned keeping functionality. Having "application" vs. "exclusion" doesn't seem helpful conceptually or for data entry. For example, in your criteria 3, the user must enter two date ranges (4 dates). So why not just enter the two date ranges for application: 2019/1/1 through 2019-7-14, and 2019-8-15 through 2019-12-31? If you have one range of "application" with 2 periods of "exception", this is the same thing as 3 ranges of "application." Either way, the user still has to enter 6 dates. What does the application vs. exception distinction buy you?

– Randall Stewart
Mar 14 at 17:26





Submitting a comment since you mentioned keeping functionality. Having "application" vs. "exclusion" doesn't seem helpful conceptually or for data entry. For example, in your criteria 3, the user must enter two date ranges (4 dates). So why not just enter the two date ranges for application: 2019/1/1 through 2019-7-14, and 2019-8-15 through 2019-12-31? If you have one range of "application" with 2 periods of "exception", this is the same thing as 3 ranges of "application." Either way, the user still has to enter 6 dates. What does the application vs. exception distinction buy you?

– Randall Stewart
Mar 14 at 17:26




2




2





What purpose do these exceptions serve? Why is it preferred to input "Applies from 2019-01-01 to 2019-12-31, except from 2019-07-14 to 2019-08-15" and not simply "Applies from 2019-01-01 to 2019-07-14 and 2019-08-15 to 2019-12-31". Same functionality, but you reduce the available inputs a lot.

– Polygnome
Mar 15 at 0:06






What purpose do these exceptions serve? Why is it preferred to input "Applies from 2019-01-01 to 2019-12-31, except from 2019-07-14 to 2019-08-15" and not simply "Applies from 2019-01-01 to 2019-07-14 and 2019-08-15 to 2019-12-31". Same functionality, but you reduce the available inputs a lot.

– Polygnome
Mar 15 at 0:06











6 Answers
6






active

oldest

votes


















33














Try showing them visually, as they build the restriction and exemption times. With each criterion added, the timeline updates.



I'm not sure I fully understand your use case, but it sounds like users need to clearly see the results of their restrictions and exceptions. I'm focusing a little bit on how to see the outcome as feedback.



Forcing them to read and calculate dates (and proportional allocations) seems to add to their workload. They also might have to look at periods across each criterion as well.



Could you have a visualization that aids in showing them as they add criteria?



A heatmap example:



Github is an example of showing a years worth of data. At a glance, you can see periods of activity.



enter image description here



Don't make them read; provide visuals in tandem.



If there's another state (i'm not too clear on this): that of unrestricted and undeclared time, the heatmap can show these gaps as well.



enter image description here






share|improve this answer

























  • Thanks Mike, that's a great idea indeed. Regarding the possible status of each day, a criteria is either "applied" or not: by default it's applied anytime. If you restrict the application to only one week for example, then all the other dates become "exceptions"...

    – Yannick Blondeau
    Mar 14 at 15:32











  • Also, it's probably better to display weekdays horizontally, since that's the most common calendar layout and what users would expect. That GitHub graph always makes me stare at it for a while before I can figure it out.

    – typo
    2 days ago


















7














I hope I am not misunderstanding your needs, but my recommendation is to do away with the exception/exclusion periods, as they are merely reinstating the default (criterion* applies) in a period of "restriction" (criterion does not apply). Intuitively it might appear simpler to say (as in your 3rd example) "The criterion should apply all year, except for a summer break", but you need two lines to say it, and you might as well say (in the same space, without the mental calisthenics):

Applies from 2019-01-01 to 2019-07-13
Applies from 2019-08-16 to 2019-12-31



To allow insertion of an exception more easily, I would recommend a split (or similarly named) button (in addition to edit and delete), which would double the current line and prefill the start of the first and the end of the second line with the start and end of the original line. A color-coded calendar to help visualize this (as suggested in other answers) would certainly be helpful but is not strictly required.



By the way, your example criterion 1 is simply the equivalent of Applies from -infinity to infinity.



*) "Criteria" is the plural of "criterion" (a standard or a trait) or of "criterium" (a bike race).






share|improve this answer










New contributor




Thomas is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.















  • 1





    Instead of a "split" button, if the exceptions are a common use case why not just keep the "add exception" button and calculate the resulting timeframes where the criterion applies? So the user would punch in "applies from 01/01 to 31/12" and "doesn't apply from 13/07 to 16/08" and the application would display the dates as above.

    – Maciej Stachowski
    Mar 15 at 14:45


















4














Overlap of rules



I apologize if I misunderstood the ASK, but I feel this is a classic case of AND & OR operations (kind of :P).



  1. Users add a rule (set up time period) i.e Application

  2. Users can add another rule on top of the above rule i.e Exception, which may or may not overlap with the set time period.

Since the application and exception are closely tied to the mental map when creating, instead of giving them separate hierarchies I feel they should have parent/child relationship.



My proposal



I love how Zapier visualizes the AND/OR operations.



In close to the above design, your interface can look like
enter image description here






share|improve this answer










New contributor




tridip1931 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.




















  • Could you clarify what ASK stands for?

    – Lightness Races in Orbit
    Mar 15 at 18:06











  • Sorry for the confusion, by ASK I mean the problem statement in the question. @LightnessRacesinOrbit

    – tridip1931
    2 days ago











  • So you mean the "question"? Not sure why this normal word was capitalised and bolded; that made it look like an acronym. Thanks for your answer!

    – Lightness Races in Orbit
    2 days ago


















3














Instead of placing action buttons at the bottom, place "Add" buttons in each section.



Applies:
From 2019-01-01 to 2019-12-31 edit delete

+ Add



Except:
From 2019-07-14 to 2019-08-15 edit delete

+ Add





share|improve this answer


















  • 3





    That would simplify things for sure, thanks. Unfortunately that wouldn't help with users being lost with the different periods definition...

    – Yannick Blondeau
    Mar 14 at 14:13


















2














Usually simplifying the copy language helps (something like "add valid time range" & "block specific dates".



A second option would be adding colors such as green (for restricted times) and red (for exception times), following the logic:




Green => go, Red =>stop




A third option is to add an icon (+ for add, - for restricting).



Best if you do all three together, this makes sure you cover more users' logics (i.e. graphic-oriented vs readers) Try to think of the user as if you were talking to a kid ;) this always helps me!






share|improve this answer


















  • 2





    This is not accessible. Red-green colour blindness is prevalent (and the meaning of red/green can also differ across cultures)

    – Lightness Races in Orbit
    Mar 15 at 18:07


















1














The problem is that you are presenting the rules, but not the result.



As a litmus test, try to answer the question: is the criterion applied on Mar 23rd?



Instead of:



Applies from 2019-01-01 to 2019-12-31

Except from 2019-07-14 to 2019-08-15


The following display is easier to reason about... especially as exceptions pile up:



Applies from 2019-01-01 to 2019-07-13
Applies from 2019-08-16 to 2019-12-31


It could also be helpful to make this more visual. Calendars would be greatly helpful; especially with clicking to toggle on/off and SHIFT+click or CTRL+click to mass select/unselect.



If space is limited, even with text you could add extra information to help the user:



Applies from 2019-01-01 to 2019-07-13 (x days)
-- y days later --
Applies from 2019-08-16 to 2019-12-31 (z days)


This order of magnitude check can help the user identifying typos.






share|improve this answer






















    Your Answer








    StackExchange.ready(function()
    var channelOptions =
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "102"
    ;
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
    createEditor();
    );

    else
    createEditor();

    );

    function createEditor()
    StackExchange.prepareEditor(
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: false,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: null,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader:
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    ,
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    );



    );













    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function ()
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fux.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f124401%2fsimplify-an-interface-for-flexibly-applying-rules-to-periods-of-time%23new-answer', 'question_page');

    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    6 Answers
    6






    active

    oldest

    votes








    6 Answers
    6






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    33














    Try showing them visually, as they build the restriction and exemption times. With each criterion added, the timeline updates.



    I'm not sure I fully understand your use case, but it sounds like users need to clearly see the results of their restrictions and exceptions. I'm focusing a little bit on how to see the outcome as feedback.



    Forcing them to read and calculate dates (and proportional allocations) seems to add to their workload. They also might have to look at periods across each criterion as well.



    Could you have a visualization that aids in showing them as they add criteria?



    A heatmap example:



    Github is an example of showing a years worth of data. At a glance, you can see periods of activity.



    enter image description here



    Don't make them read; provide visuals in tandem.



    If there's another state (i'm not too clear on this): that of unrestricted and undeclared time, the heatmap can show these gaps as well.



    enter image description here






    share|improve this answer

























    • Thanks Mike, that's a great idea indeed. Regarding the possible status of each day, a criteria is either "applied" or not: by default it's applied anytime. If you restrict the application to only one week for example, then all the other dates become "exceptions"...

      – Yannick Blondeau
      Mar 14 at 15:32











    • Also, it's probably better to display weekdays horizontally, since that's the most common calendar layout and what users would expect. That GitHub graph always makes me stare at it for a while before I can figure it out.

      – typo
      2 days ago















    33














    Try showing them visually, as they build the restriction and exemption times. With each criterion added, the timeline updates.



    I'm not sure I fully understand your use case, but it sounds like users need to clearly see the results of their restrictions and exceptions. I'm focusing a little bit on how to see the outcome as feedback.



    Forcing them to read and calculate dates (and proportional allocations) seems to add to their workload. They also might have to look at periods across each criterion as well.



    Could you have a visualization that aids in showing them as they add criteria?



    A heatmap example:



    Github is an example of showing a years worth of data. At a glance, you can see periods of activity.



    enter image description here



    Don't make them read; provide visuals in tandem.



    If there's another state (i'm not too clear on this): that of unrestricted and undeclared time, the heatmap can show these gaps as well.



    enter image description here






    share|improve this answer

























    • Thanks Mike, that's a great idea indeed. Regarding the possible status of each day, a criteria is either "applied" or not: by default it's applied anytime. If you restrict the application to only one week for example, then all the other dates become "exceptions"...

      – Yannick Blondeau
      Mar 14 at 15:32











    • Also, it's probably better to display weekdays horizontally, since that's the most common calendar layout and what users would expect. That GitHub graph always makes me stare at it for a while before I can figure it out.

      – typo
      2 days ago













    33












    33








    33







    Try showing them visually, as they build the restriction and exemption times. With each criterion added, the timeline updates.



    I'm not sure I fully understand your use case, but it sounds like users need to clearly see the results of their restrictions and exceptions. I'm focusing a little bit on how to see the outcome as feedback.



    Forcing them to read and calculate dates (and proportional allocations) seems to add to their workload. They also might have to look at periods across each criterion as well.



    Could you have a visualization that aids in showing them as they add criteria?



    A heatmap example:



    Github is an example of showing a years worth of data. At a glance, you can see periods of activity.



    enter image description here



    Don't make them read; provide visuals in tandem.



    If there's another state (i'm not too clear on this): that of unrestricted and undeclared time, the heatmap can show these gaps as well.



    enter image description here






    share|improve this answer















    Try showing them visually, as they build the restriction and exemption times. With each criterion added, the timeline updates.



    I'm not sure I fully understand your use case, but it sounds like users need to clearly see the results of their restrictions and exceptions. I'm focusing a little bit on how to see the outcome as feedback.



    Forcing them to read and calculate dates (and proportional allocations) seems to add to their workload. They also might have to look at periods across each criterion as well.



    Could you have a visualization that aids in showing them as they add criteria?



    A heatmap example:



    Github is an example of showing a years worth of data. At a glance, you can see periods of activity.



    enter image description here



    Don't make them read; provide visuals in tandem.



    If there's another state (i'm not too clear on this): that of unrestricted and undeclared time, the heatmap can show these gaps as well.



    enter image description here







    share|improve this answer














    share|improve this answer



    share|improve this answer








    edited 2 days ago









    Solar Mike

    1385




    1385










    answered Mar 14 at 14:23









    Mike MMike M

    10.7k12331




    10.7k12331












    • Thanks Mike, that's a great idea indeed. Regarding the possible status of each day, a criteria is either "applied" or not: by default it's applied anytime. If you restrict the application to only one week for example, then all the other dates become "exceptions"...

      – Yannick Blondeau
      Mar 14 at 15:32











    • Also, it's probably better to display weekdays horizontally, since that's the most common calendar layout and what users would expect. That GitHub graph always makes me stare at it for a while before I can figure it out.

      – typo
      2 days ago

















    • Thanks Mike, that's a great idea indeed. Regarding the possible status of each day, a criteria is either "applied" or not: by default it's applied anytime. If you restrict the application to only one week for example, then all the other dates become "exceptions"...

      – Yannick Blondeau
      Mar 14 at 15:32











    • Also, it's probably better to display weekdays horizontally, since that's the most common calendar layout and what users would expect. That GitHub graph always makes me stare at it for a while before I can figure it out.

      – typo
      2 days ago
















    Thanks Mike, that's a great idea indeed. Regarding the possible status of each day, a criteria is either "applied" or not: by default it's applied anytime. If you restrict the application to only one week for example, then all the other dates become "exceptions"...

    – Yannick Blondeau
    Mar 14 at 15:32





    Thanks Mike, that's a great idea indeed. Regarding the possible status of each day, a criteria is either "applied" or not: by default it's applied anytime. If you restrict the application to only one week for example, then all the other dates become "exceptions"...

    – Yannick Blondeau
    Mar 14 at 15:32













    Also, it's probably better to display weekdays horizontally, since that's the most common calendar layout and what users would expect. That GitHub graph always makes me stare at it for a while before I can figure it out.

    – typo
    2 days ago





    Also, it's probably better to display weekdays horizontally, since that's the most common calendar layout and what users would expect. That GitHub graph always makes me stare at it for a while before I can figure it out.

    – typo
    2 days ago













    7














    I hope I am not misunderstanding your needs, but my recommendation is to do away with the exception/exclusion periods, as they are merely reinstating the default (criterion* applies) in a period of "restriction" (criterion does not apply). Intuitively it might appear simpler to say (as in your 3rd example) "The criterion should apply all year, except for a summer break", but you need two lines to say it, and you might as well say (in the same space, without the mental calisthenics):

    Applies from 2019-01-01 to 2019-07-13
    Applies from 2019-08-16 to 2019-12-31



    To allow insertion of an exception more easily, I would recommend a split (or similarly named) button (in addition to edit and delete), which would double the current line and prefill the start of the first and the end of the second line with the start and end of the original line. A color-coded calendar to help visualize this (as suggested in other answers) would certainly be helpful but is not strictly required.



    By the way, your example criterion 1 is simply the equivalent of Applies from -infinity to infinity.



    *) "Criteria" is the plural of "criterion" (a standard or a trait) or of "criterium" (a bike race).






    share|improve this answer










    New contributor




    Thomas is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
    Check out our Code of Conduct.















    • 1





      Instead of a "split" button, if the exceptions are a common use case why not just keep the "add exception" button and calculate the resulting timeframes where the criterion applies? So the user would punch in "applies from 01/01 to 31/12" and "doesn't apply from 13/07 to 16/08" and the application would display the dates as above.

      – Maciej Stachowski
      Mar 15 at 14:45















    7














    I hope I am not misunderstanding your needs, but my recommendation is to do away with the exception/exclusion periods, as they are merely reinstating the default (criterion* applies) in a period of "restriction" (criterion does not apply). Intuitively it might appear simpler to say (as in your 3rd example) "The criterion should apply all year, except for a summer break", but you need two lines to say it, and you might as well say (in the same space, without the mental calisthenics):

    Applies from 2019-01-01 to 2019-07-13
    Applies from 2019-08-16 to 2019-12-31



    To allow insertion of an exception more easily, I would recommend a split (or similarly named) button (in addition to edit and delete), which would double the current line and prefill the start of the first and the end of the second line with the start and end of the original line. A color-coded calendar to help visualize this (as suggested in other answers) would certainly be helpful but is not strictly required.



    By the way, your example criterion 1 is simply the equivalent of Applies from -infinity to infinity.



    *) "Criteria" is the plural of "criterion" (a standard or a trait) or of "criterium" (a bike race).






    share|improve this answer










    New contributor




    Thomas is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
    Check out our Code of Conduct.















    • 1





      Instead of a "split" button, if the exceptions are a common use case why not just keep the "add exception" button and calculate the resulting timeframes where the criterion applies? So the user would punch in "applies from 01/01 to 31/12" and "doesn't apply from 13/07 to 16/08" and the application would display the dates as above.

      – Maciej Stachowski
      Mar 15 at 14:45













    7












    7








    7







    I hope I am not misunderstanding your needs, but my recommendation is to do away with the exception/exclusion periods, as they are merely reinstating the default (criterion* applies) in a period of "restriction" (criterion does not apply). Intuitively it might appear simpler to say (as in your 3rd example) "The criterion should apply all year, except for a summer break", but you need two lines to say it, and you might as well say (in the same space, without the mental calisthenics):

    Applies from 2019-01-01 to 2019-07-13
    Applies from 2019-08-16 to 2019-12-31



    To allow insertion of an exception more easily, I would recommend a split (or similarly named) button (in addition to edit and delete), which would double the current line and prefill the start of the first and the end of the second line with the start and end of the original line. A color-coded calendar to help visualize this (as suggested in other answers) would certainly be helpful but is not strictly required.



    By the way, your example criterion 1 is simply the equivalent of Applies from -infinity to infinity.



    *) "Criteria" is the plural of "criterion" (a standard or a trait) or of "criterium" (a bike race).






    share|improve this answer










    New contributor




    Thomas is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
    Check out our Code of Conduct.










    I hope I am not misunderstanding your needs, but my recommendation is to do away with the exception/exclusion periods, as they are merely reinstating the default (criterion* applies) in a period of "restriction" (criterion does not apply). Intuitively it might appear simpler to say (as in your 3rd example) "The criterion should apply all year, except for a summer break", but you need two lines to say it, and you might as well say (in the same space, without the mental calisthenics):

    Applies from 2019-01-01 to 2019-07-13
    Applies from 2019-08-16 to 2019-12-31



    To allow insertion of an exception more easily, I would recommend a split (or similarly named) button (in addition to edit and delete), which would double the current line and prefill the start of the first and the end of the second line with the start and end of the original line. A color-coded calendar to help visualize this (as suggested in other answers) would certainly be helpful but is not strictly required.



    By the way, your example criterion 1 is simply the equivalent of Applies from -infinity to infinity.



    *) "Criteria" is the plural of "criterion" (a standard or a trait) or of "criterium" (a bike race).







    share|improve this answer










    New contributor




    Thomas is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
    Check out our Code of Conduct.









    share|improve this answer



    share|improve this answer








    edited Mar 15 at 8:28









    Prajwal Dhatwalia

    2046




    2046






    New contributor




    Thomas is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
    Check out our Code of Conduct.









    answered Mar 14 at 22:31









    ThomasThomas

    711




    711




    New contributor




    Thomas is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
    Check out our Code of Conduct.





    New contributor





    Thomas is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
    Check out our Code of Conduct.






    Thomas is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
    Check out our Code of Conduct.







    • 1





      Instead of a "split" button, if the exceptions are a common use case why not just keep the "add exception" button and calculate the resulting timeframes where the criterion applies? So the user would punch in "applies from 01/01 to 31/12" and "doesn't apply from 13/07 to 16/08" and the application would display the dates as above.

      – Maciej Stachowski
      Mar 15 at 14:45












    • 1





      Instead of a "split" button, if the exceptions are a common use case why not just keep the "add exception" button and calculate the resulting timeframes where the criterion applies? So the user would punch in "applies from 01/01 to 31/12" and "doesn't apply from 13/07 to 16/08" and the application would display the dates as above.

      – Maciej Stachowski
      Mar 15 at 14:45







    1




    1





    Instead of a "split" button, if the exceptions are a common use case why not just keep the "add exception" button and calculate the resulting timeframes where the criterion applies? So the user would punch in "applies from 01/01 to 31/12" and "doesn't apply from 13/07 to 16/08" and the application would display the dates as above.

    – Maciej Stachowski
    Mar 15 at 14:45





    Instead of a "split" button, if the exceptions are a common use case why not just keep the "add exception" button and calculate the resulting timeframes where the criterion applies? So the user would punch in "applies from 01/01 to 31/12" and "doesn't apply from 13/07 to 16/08" and the application would display the dates as above.

    – Maciej Stachowski
    Mar 15 at 14:45











    4














    Overlap of rules



    I apologize if I misunderstood the ASK, but I feel this is a classic case of AND & OR operations (kind of :P).



    1. Users add a rule (set up time period) i.e Application

    2. Users can add another rule on top of the above rule i.e Exception, which may or may not overlap with the set time period.

    Since the application and exception are closely tied to the mental map when creating, instead of giving them separate hierarchies I feel they should have parent/child relationship.



    My proposal



    I love how Zapier visualizes the AND/OR operations.



    In close to the above design, your interface can look like
    enter image description here






    share|improve this answer










    New contributor




    tridip1931 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
    Check out our Code of Conduct.




















    • Could you clarify what ASK stands for?

      – Lightness Races in Orbit
      Mar 15 at 18:06











    • Sorry for the confusion, by ASK I mean the problem statement in the question. @LightnessRacesinOrbit

      – tridip1931
      2 days ago











    • So you mean the "question"? Not sure why this normal word was capitalised and bolded; that made it look like an acronym. Thanks for your answer!

      – Lightness Races in Orbit
      2 days ago















    4














    Overlap of rules



    I apologize if I misunderstood the ASK, but I feel this is a classic case of AND & OR operations (kind of :P).



    1. Users add a rule (set up time period) i.e Application

    2. Users can add another rule on top of the above rule i.e Exception, which may or may not overlap with the set time period.

    Since the application and exception are closely tied to the mental map when creating, instead of giving them separate hierarchies I feel they should have parent/child relationship.



    My proposal



    I love how Zapier visualizes the AND/OR operations.



    In close to the above design, your interface can look like
    enter image description here






    share|improve this answer










    New contributor




    tridip1931 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
    Check out our Code of Conduct.




















    • Could you clarify what ASK stands for?

      – Lightness Races in Orbit
      Mar 15 at 18:06











    • Sorry for the confusion, by ASK I mean the problem statement in the question. @LightnessRacesinOrbit

      – tridip1931
      2 days ago











    • So you mean the "question"? Not sure why this normal word was capitalised and bolded; that made it look like an acronym. Thanks for your answer!

      – Lightness Races in Orbit
      2 days ago













    4












    4








    4







    Overlap of rules



    I apologize if I misunderstood the ASK, but I feel this is a classic case of AND & OR operations (kind of :P).



    1. Users add a rule (set up time period) i.e Application

    2. Users can add another rule on top of the above rule i.e Exception, which may or may not overlap with the set time period.

    Since the application and exception are closely tied to the mental map when creating, instead of giving them separate hierarchies I feel they should have parent/child relationship.



    My proposal



    I love how Zapier visualizes the AND/OR operations.



    In close to the above design, your interface can look like
    enter image description here






    share|improve this answer










    New contributor




    tridip1931 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
    Check out our Code of Conduct.










    Overlap of rules



    I apologize if I misunderstood the ASK, but I feel this is a classic case of AND & OR operations (kind of :P).



    1. Users add a rule (set up time period) i.e Application

    2. Users can add another rule on top of the above rule i.e Exception, which may or may not overlap with the set time period.

    Since the application and exception are closely tied to the mental map when creating, instead of giving them separate hierarchies I feel they should have parent/child relationship.



    My proposal



    I love how Zapier visualizes the AND/OR operations.



    In close to the above design, your interface can look like
    enter image description here







    share|improve this answer










    New contributor




    tridip1931 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
    Check out our Code of Conduct.









    share|improve this answer



    share|improve this answer








    edited 2 days ago









    Prajwal Dhatwalia

    2046




    2046






    New contributor




    tridip1931 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
    Check out our Code of Conduct.









    answered Mar 15 at 7:58









    tridip1931tridip1931

    414




    414




    New contributor




    tridip1931 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
    Check out our Code of Conduct.





    New contributor





    tridip1931 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
    Check out our Code of Conduct.






    tridip1931 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
    Check out our Code of Conduct.












    • Could you clarify what ASK stands for?

      – Lightness Races in Orbit
      Mar 15 at 18:06











    • Sorry for the confusion, by ASK I mean the problem statement in the question. @LightnessRacesinOrbit

      – tridip1931
      2 days ago











    • So you mean the "question"? Not sure why this normal word was capitalised and bolded; that made it look like an acronym. Thanks for your answer!

      – Lightness Races in Orbit
      2 days ago

















    • Could you clarify what ASK stands for?

      – Lightness Races in Orbit
      Mar 15 at 18:06











    • Sorry for the confusion, by ASK I mean the problem statement in the question. @LightnessRacesinOrbit

      – tridip1931
      2 days ago











    • So you mean the "question"? Not sure why this normal word was capitalised and bolded; that made it look like an acronym. Thanks for your answer!

      – Lightness Races in Orbit
      2 days ago
















    Could you clarify what ASK stands for?

    – Lightness Races in Orbit
    Mar 15 at 18:06





    Could you clarify what ASK stands for?

    – Lightness Races in Orbit
    Mar 15 at 18:06













    Sorry for the confusion, by ASK I mean the problem statement in the question. @LightnessRacesinOrbit

    – tridip1931
    2 days ago





    Sorry for the confusion, by ASK I mean the problem statement in the question. @LightnessRacesinOrbit

    – tridip1931
    2 days ago













    So you mean the "question"? Not sure why this normal word was capitalised and bolded; that made it look like an acronym. Thanks for your answer!

    – Lightness Races in Orbit
    2 days ago





    So you mean the "question"? Not sure why this normal word was capitalised and bolded; that made it look like an acronym. Thanks for your answer!

    – Lightness Races in Orbit
    2 days ago











    3














    Instead of placing action buttons at the bottom, place "Add" buttons in each section.



    Applies:
    From 2019-01-01 to 2019-12-31 edit delete

    + Add



    Except:
    From 2019-07-14 to 2019-08-15 edit delete

    + Add





    share|improve this answer


















    • 3





      That would simplify things for sure, thanks. Unfortunately that wouldn't help with users being lost with the different periods definition...

      – Yannick Blondeau
      Mar 14 at 14:13















    3














    Instead of placing action buttons at the bottom, place "Add" buttons in each section.



    Applies:
    From 2019-01-01 to 2019-12-31 edit delete

    + Add



    Except:
    From 2019-07-14 to 2019-08-15 edit delete

    + Add





    share|improve this answer


















    • 3





      That would simplify things for sure, thanks. Unfortunately that wouldn't help with users being lost with the different periods definition...

      – Yannick Blondeau
      Mar 14 at 14:13













    3












    3








    3







    Instead of placing action buttons at the bottom, place "Add" buttons in each section.



    Applies:
    From 2019-01-01 to 2019-12-31 edit delete

    + Add



    Except:
    From 2019-07-14 to 2019-08-15 edit delete

    + Add





    share|improve this answer













    Instead of placing action buttons at the bottom, place "Add" buttons in each section.



    Applies:
    From 2019-01-01 to 2019-12-31 edit delete

    + Add



    Except:
    From 2019-07-14 to 2019-08-15 edit delete

    + Add






    share|improve this answer












    share|improve this answer



    share|improve this answer










    answered Mar 14 at 14:01









    Stacy HStacy H

    84817




    84817







    • 3





      That would simplify things for sure, thanks. Unfortunately that wouldn't help with users being lost with the different periods definition...

      – Yannick Blondeau
      Mar 14 at 14:13












    • 3





      That would simplify things for sure, thanks. Unfortunately that wouldn't help with users being lost with the different periods definition...

      – Yannick Blondeau
      Mar 14 at 14:13







    3




    3





    That would simplify things for sure, thanks. Unfortunately that wouldn't help with users being lost with the different periods definition...

    – Yannick Blondeau
    Mar 14 at 14:13





    That would simplify things for sure, thanks. Unfortunately that wouldn't help with users being lost with the different periods definition...

    – Yannick Blondeau
    Mar 14 at 14:13











    2














    Usually simplifying the copy language helps (something like "add valid time range" & "block specific dates".



    A second option would be adding colors such as green (for restricted times) and red (for exception times), following the logic:




    Green => go, Red =>stop




    A third option is to add an icon (+ for add, - for restricting).



    Best if you do all three together, this makes sure you cover more users' logics (i.e. graphic-oriented vs readers) Try to think of the user as if you were talking to a kid ;) this always helps me!






    share|improve this answer


















    • 2





      This is not accessible. Red-green colour blindness is prevalent (and the meaning of red/green can also differ across cultures)

      – Lightness Races in Orbit
      Mar 15 at 18:07















    2














    Usually simplifying the copy language helps (something like "add valid time range" & "block specific dates".



    A second option would be adding colors such as green (for restricted times) and red (for exception times), following the logic:




    Green => go, Red =>stop




    A third option is to add an icon (+ for add, - for restricting).



    Best if you do all three together, this makes sure you cover more users' logics (i.e. graphic-oriented vs readers) Try to think of the user as if you were talking to a kid ;) this always helps me!






    share|improve this answer


















    • 2





      This is not accessible. Red-green colour blindness is prevalent (and the meaning of red/green can also differ across cultures)

      – Lightness Races in Orbit
      Mar 15 at 18:07













    2












    2








    2







    Usually simplifying the copy language helps (something like "add valid time range" & "block specific dates".



    A second option would be adding colors such as green (for restricted times) and red (for exception times), following the logic:




    Green => go, Red =>stop




    A third option is to add an icon (+ for add, - for restricting).



    Best if you do all three together, this makes sure you cover more users' logics (i.e. graphic-oriented vs readers) Try to think of the user as if you were talking to a kid ;) this always helps me!






    share|improve this answer













    Usually simplifying the copy language helps (something like "add valid time range" & "block specific dates".



    A second option would be adding colors such as green (for restricted times) and red (for exception times), following the logic:




    Green => go, Red =>stop




    A third option is to add an icon (+ for add, - for restricting).



    Best if you do all three together, this makes sure you cover more users' logics (i.e. graphic-oriented vs readers) Try to think of the user as if you were talking to a kid ;) this always helps me!







    share|improve this answer












    share|improve this answer



    share|improve this answer










    answered Mar 14 at 14:21









    Andrea MaillardAndrea Maillard

    312




    312







    • 2





      This is not accessible. Red-green colour blindness is prevalent (and the meaning of red/green can also differ across cultures)

      – Lightness Races in Orbit
      Mar 15 at 18:07












    • 2





      This is not accessible. Red-green colour blindness is prevalent (and the meaning of red/green can also differ across cultures)

      – Lightness Races in Orbit
      Mar 15 at 18:07







    2




    2





    This is not accessible. Red-green colour blindness is prevalent (and the meaning of red/green can also differ across cultures)

    – Lightness Races in Orbit
    Mar 15 at 18:07





    This is not accessible. Red-green colour blindness is prevalent (and the meaning of red/green can also differ across cultures)

    – Lightness Races in Orbit
    Mar 15 at 18:07











    1














    The problem is that you are presenting the rules, but not the result.



    As a litmus test, try to answer the question: is the criterion applied on Mar 23rd?



    Instead of:



    Applies from 2019-01-01 to 2019-12-31

    Except from 2019-07-14 to 2019-08-15


    The following display is easier to reason about... especially as exceptions pile up:



    Applies from 2019-01-01 to 2019-07-13
    Applies from 2019-08-16 to 2019-12-31


    It could also be helpful to make this more visual. Calendars would be greatly helpful; especially with clicking to toggle on/off and SHIFT+click or CTRL+click to mass select/unselect.



    If space is limited, even with text you could add extra information to help the user:



    Applies from 2019-01-01 to 2019-07-13 (x days)
    -- y days later --
    Applies from 2019-08-16 to 2019-12-31 (z days)


    This order of magnitude check can help the user identifying typos.






    share|improve this answer



























      1














      The problem is that you are presenting the rules, but not the result.



      As a litmus test, try to answer the question: is the criterion applied on Mar 23rd?



      Instead of:



      Applies from 2019-01-01 to 2019-12-31

      Except from 2019-07-14 to 2019-08-15


      The following display is easier to reason about... especially as exceptions pile up:



      Applies from 2019-01-01 to 2019-07-13
      Applies from 2019-08-16 to 2019-12-31


      It could also be helpful to make this more visual. Calendars would be greatly helpful; especially with clicking to toggle on/off and SHIFT+click or CTRL+click to mass select/unselect.



      If space is limited, even with text you could add extra information to help the user:



      Applies from 2019-01-01 to 2019-07-13 (x days)
      -- y days later --
      Applies from 2019-08-16 to 2019-12-31 (z days)


      This order of magnitude check can help the user identifying typos.






      share|improve this answer

























        1












        1








        1







        The problem is that you are presenting the rules, but not the result.



        As a litmus test, try to answer the question: is the criterion applied on Mar 23rd?



        Instead of:



        Applies from 2019-01-01 to 2019-12-31

        Except from 2019-07-14 to 2019-08-15


        The following display is easier to reason about... especially as exceptions pile up:



        Applies from 2019-01-01 to 2019-07-13
        Applies from 2019-08-16 to 2019-12-31


        It could also be helpful to make this more visual. Calendars would be greatly helpful; especially with clicking to toggle on/off and SHIFT+click or CTRL+click to mass select/unselect.



        If space is limited, even with text you could add extra information to help the user:



        Applies from 2019-01-01 to 2019-07-13 (x days)
        -- y days later --
        Applies from 2019-08-16 to 2019-12-31 (z days)


        This order of magnitude check can help the user identifying typos.






        share|improve this answer













        The problem is that you are presenting the rules, but not the result.



        As a litmus test, try to answer the question: is the criterion applied on Mar 23rd?



        Instead of:



        Applies from 2019-01-01 to 2019-12-31

        Except from 2019-07-14 to 2019-08-15


        The following display is easier to reason about... especially as exceptions pile up:



        Applies from 2019-01-01 to 2019-07-13
        Applies from 2019-08-16 to 2019-12-31


        It could also be helpful to make this more visual. Calendars would be greatly helpful; especially with clicking to toggle on/off and SHIFT+click or CTRL+click to mass select/unselect.



        If space is limited, even with text you could add extra information to help the user:



        Applies from 2019-01-01 to 2019-07-13 (x days)
        -- y days later --
        Applies from 2019-08-16 to 2019-12-31 (z days)


        This order of magnitude check can help the user identifying typos.







        share|improve this answer












        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer










        answered Mar 15 at 16:42









        Matthieu M.Matthieu M.

        21126




        21126



























            draft saved

            draft discarded
















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to User Experience Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid


            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fux.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f124401%2fsimplify-an-interface-for-flexibly-applying-rules-to-periods-of-time%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Bruad Bilen | Luke uk diar | NawigatsjuunCommonskategorii: BruadCommonskategorii: RunstükenWikiquote: Bruad

            What is the offset in a seaplane's hull?

            Slayer Innehåll Historia | Stil, komposition och lyrik | Bandets betydelse och framgångar | Sidoprojekt och samarbeten | Kontroverser | Medlemmar | Utmärkelser och nomineringar | Turnéer och festivaler | Diskografi | Referenser | Externa länkar | Navigeringsmenywww.slayer.net”Metal Massacre vol. 1””Metal Massacre vol. 3””Metal Massacre Volume III””Show No Mercy””Haunting the Chapel””Live Undead””Hell Awaits””Reign in Blood””Reign in Blood””Gold & Platinum – Reign in Blood””Golden Gods Awards Winners”originalet”Kerrang! Hall Of Fame””Slayer Looks Back On 37-Year Career In New Video Series: Part Two””South of Heaven””Gold & Platinum – South of Heaven””Seasons in the Abyss””Gold & Platinum - Seasons in the Abyss””Divine Intervention””Divine Intervention - Release group by Slayer””Gold & Platinum - Divine Intervention””Live Intrusion””Undisputed Attitude””Abolish Government/Superficial Love””Release “Slatanic Slaughter: A Tribute to Slayer” by Various Artists””Diabolus in Musica””Soundtrack to the Apocalypse””God Hates Us All””Systematic - Relationships””War at the Warfield””Gold & Platinum - War at the Warfield””Soundtrack to the Apocalypse””Gold & Platinum - Still Reigning””Metallica, Slayer, Iron Mauden Among Winners At Metal Hammer Awards””Eternal Pyre””Eternal Pyre - Slayer release group””Eternal Pyre””Metal Storm Awards 2006””Kerrang! Hall Of Fame””Slayer Wins 'Best Metal' Grammy Award””Slayer Guitarist Jeff Hanneman Dies””Bullet-For My Valentine booed at Metal Hammer Golden Gods Awards””Unholy Aliance””The End Of Slayer?””Slayer: We Could Thrash Out Two More Albums If We're Fast Enough...””'The Unholy Alliance: Chapter III' UK Dates Added”originalet”Megadeth And Slayer To Co-Headline 'Canadian Carnage' Trek”originalet”World Painted Blood””Release “World Painted Blood” by Slayer””Metallica Heading To Cinemas””Slayer, Megadeth To Join Forces For 'European Carnage' Tour - Dec. 18, 2010”originalet”Slayer's Hanneman Contracts Acute Infection; Band To Bring In Guest Guitarist””Cannibal Corpse's Pat O'Brien Will Step In As Slayer's Guest Guitarist”originalet”Slayer’s Jeff Hanneman Dead at 49””Dave Lombardo Says He Made Only $67,000 In 2011 While Touring With Slayer””Slayer: We Do Not Agree With Dave Lombardo's Substance Or Timeline Of Events””Slayer Welcomes Drummer Paul Bostaph Back To The Fold””Slayer Hope to Unveil Never-Before-Heard Jeff Hanneman Material on Next Album””Slayer Debut New Song 'Implode' During Surprise Golden Gods Appearance””Release group Repentless by Slayer””Repentless - Slayer - Credits””Slayer””Metal Storm Awards 2015””Slayer - to release comic book "Repentless #1"””Slayer To Release 'Repentless' 6.66" Vinyl Box Set””BREAKING NEWS: Slayer Announce Farewell Tour””Slayer Recruit Lamb of God, Anthrax, Behemoth + Testament for Final Tour””Slayer lägger ner efter 37 år””Slayer Announces Second North American Leg Of 'Final' Tour””Final World Tour””Slayer Announces Final European Tour With Lamb of God, Anthrax And Obituary””Slayer To Tour Europe With Lamb of God, Anthrax And Obituary””Slayer To Play 'Last French Show Ever' At Next Year's Hellfst””Slayer's Final World Tour Will Extend Into 2019””Death Angel's Rob Cavestany On Slayer's 'Farewell' Tour: 'Some Of Us Could See This Coming'””Testament Has No Plans To Retire Anytime Soon, Says Chuck Billy””Anthrax's Scott Ian On Slayer's 'Farewell' Tour Plans: 'I Was Surprised And I Wasn't Surprised'””Slayer””Slayer's Morbid Schlock””Review/Rock; For Slayer, the Mania Is the Message””Slayer - Biography””Slayer - Reign In Blood”originalet”Dave Lombardo””An exclusive oral history of Slayer”originalet”Exclusive! Interview With Slayer Guitarist Jeff Hanneman”originalet”Thinking Out Loud: Slayer's Kerry King on hair metal, Satan and being polite””Slayer Lyrics””Slayer - Biography””Most influential artists for extreme metal music””Slayer - Reign in Blood””Slayer guitarist Jeff Hanneman dies aged 49””Slatanic Slaughter: A Tribute to Slayer””Gateway to Hell: A Tribute to Slayer””Covered In Blood””Slayer: The Origins of Thrash in San Francisco, CA.””Why They Rule - #6 Slayer”originalet”Guitar World's 100 Greatest Heavy Metal Guitarists Of All Time”originalet”The fans have spoken: Slayer comes out on top in readers' polls”originalet”Tribute to Jeff Hanneman (1964-2013)””Lamb Of God Frontman: We Sound Like A Slayer Rip-Off””BEHEMOTH Frontman Pays Tribute To SLAYER's JEFF HANNEMAN””Slayer, Hatebreed Doing Double Duty On This Year's Ozzfest””System of a Down””Lacuna Coil’s Andrea Ferro Talks Influences, Skateboarding, Band Origins + More””Slayer - Reign in Blood””Into The Lungs of Hell””Slayer rules - en utställning om fans””Slayer and Their Fans Slashed Through a No-Holds-Barred Night at Gas Monkey””Home””Slayer””Gold & Platinum - The Big 4 Live from Sofia, Bulgaria””Exclusive! Interview With Slayer Guitarist Kerry King””2008-02-23: Wiltern, Los Angeles, CA, USA””Slayer's Kerry King To Perform With Megadeth Tonight! - Oct. 21, 2010”originalet”Dave Lombardo - Biography”Slayer Case DismissedArkiveradUltimate Classic Rock: Slayer guitarist Jeff Hanneman dead at 49.”Slayer: "We could never do any thing like Some Kind Of Monster..."””Cannibal Corpse'S Pat O'Brien Will Step In As Slayer'S Guest Guitarist | The Official Slayer Site”originalet”Slayer Wins 'Best Metal' Grammy Award””Slayer Guitarist Jeff Hanneman Dies””Kerrang! Awards 2006 Blog: Kerrang! Hall Of Fame””Kerrang! Awards 2013: Kerrang! Legend”originalet”Metallica, Slayer, Iron Maien Among Winners At Metal Hammer Awards””Metal Hammer Golden Gods Awards””Bullet For My Valentine Booed At Metal Hammer Golden Gods Awards””Metal Storm Awards 2006””Metal Storm Awards 2015””Slayer's Concert History””Slayer - Relationships””Slayer - Releases”Slayers officiella webbplatsSlayer på MusicBrainzOfficiell webbplatsSlayerSlayerr1373445760000 0001 1540 47353068615-5086262726cb13906545x(data)6033143kn20030215029