Drawing without replacement: why is the order of draw irrelevant?












4












$begingroup$


I am trying to wrap my head around this problem:




Daniel randomly chooses balls from the group of $6$ red and $4$ green. What is the probability that he picks $2$ red and $3$ green if balls are drawn without replacement.




What I remember from my college days that the probability is found by this formula:



$$P(A)=frac{binom{6}{2}binom{4}{3}}{binom{10}{5}}=frac{5}{21}$$



Is this correct? I am trying to understand why this works. Wouldn't probability depend on the order of balls drawn as the number of balls is changing after each draw? I get how we obtain numerator and denominator, I just feel that the probability should be dependent on the order. For example, the probability to pick red first is $frac{6}{10}$ so the probability for the second draw becomes $frac{5}{9}$ for red and $frac{4}{9}$ for green. But if the first picked ball is green, the probability for the second draw becomes $frac{6}{9}$ for red and $frac{3}{9}$ for green. What am I missing?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Usually the "nominator" is called numerator.
    $endgroup$
    – callculus
    Apr 18 at 12:12










  • $begingroup$
    @callculus: yes, of, course, I need coffee :)
    $endgroup$
    – Vasya
    Apr 18 at 12:20






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    The order doesn't matter because $P(A)$ is ultimately the sum of various conditional probabilities, and addition is both commutative and associative.
    $endgroup$
    – chepner
    Apr 18 at 14:04
















4












$begingroup$


I am trying to wrap my head around this problem:




Daniel randomly chooses balls from the group of $6$ red and $4$ green. What is the probability that he picks $2$ red and $3$ green if balls are drawn without replacement.




What I remember from my college days that the probability is found by this formula:



$$P(A)=frac{binom{6}{2}binom{4}{3}}{binom{10}{5}}=frac{5}{21}$$



Is this correct? I am trying to understand why this works. Wouldn't probability depend on the order of balls drawn as the number of balls is changing after each draw? I get how we obtain numerator and denominator, I just feel that the probability should be dependent on the order. For example, the probability to pick red first is $frac{6}{10}$ so the probability for the second draw becomes $frac{5}{9}$ for red and $frac{4}{9}$ for green. But if the first picked ball is green, the probability for the second draw becomes $frac{6}{9}$ for red and $frac{3}{9}$ for green. What am I missing?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Usually the "nominator" is called numerator.
    $endgroup$
    – callculus
    Apr 18 at 12:12










  • $begingroup$
    @callculus: yes, of, course, I need coffee :)
    $endgroup$
    – Vasya
    Apr 18 at 12:20






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    The order doesn't matter because $P(A)$ is ultimately the sum of various conditional probabilities, and addition is both commutative and associative.
    $endgroup$
    – chepner
    Apr 18 at 14:04














4












4








4


3



$begingroup$


I am trying to wrap my head around this problem:




Daniel randomly chooses balls from the group of $6$ red and $4$ green. What is the probability that he picks $2$ red and $3$ green if balls are drawn without replacement.




What I remember from my college days that the probability is found by this formula:



$$P(A)=frac{binom{6}{2}binom{4}{3}}{binom{10}{5}}=frac{5}{21}$$



Is this correct? I am trying to understand why this works. Wouldn't probability depend on the order of balls drawn as the number of balls is changing after each draw? I get how we obtain numerator and denominator, I just feel that the probability should be dependent on the order. For example, the probability to pick red first is $frac{6}{10}$ so the probability for the second draw becomes $frac{5}{9}$ for red and $frac{4}{9}$ for green. But if the first picked ball is green, the probability for the second draw becomes $frac{6}{9}$ for red and $frac{3}{9}$ for green. What am I missing?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$




I am trying to wrap my head around this problem:




Daniel randomly chooses balls from the group of $6$ red and $4$ green. What is the probability that he picks $2$ red and $3$ green if balls are drawn without replacement.




What I remember from my college days that the probability is found by this formula:



$$P(A)=frac{binom{6}{2}binom{4}{3}}{binom{10}{5}}=frac{5}{21}$$



Is this correct? I am trying to understand why this works. Wouldn't probability depend on the order of balls drawn as the number of balls is changing after each draw? I get how we obtain numerator and denominator, I just feel that the probability should be dependent on the order. For example, the probability to pick red first is $frac{6}{10}$ so the probability for the second draw becomes $frac{5}{9}$ for red and $frac{4}{9}$ for green. But if the first picked ball is green, the probability for the second draw becomes $frac{6}{9}$ for red and $frac{3}{9}$ for green. What am I missing?







probability probability-theory






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Apr 18 at 22:10









JeffC

1053




1053










asked Apr 18 at 12:05









VasyaVasya

4,5971619




4,5971619








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Usually the "nominator" is called numerator.
    $endgroup$
    – callculus
    Apr 18 at 12:12










  • $begingroup$
    @callculus: yes, of, course, I need coffee :)
    $endgroup$
    – Vasya
    Apr 18 at 12:20






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    The order doesn't matter because $P(A)$ is ultimately the sum of various conditional probabilities, and addition is both commutative and associative.
    $endgroup$
    – chepner
    Apr 18 at 14:04














  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Usually the "nominator" is called numerator.
    $endgroup$
    – callculus
    Apr 18 at 12:12










  • $begingroup$
    @callculus: yes, of, course, I need coffee :)
    $endgroup$
    – Vasya
    Apr 18 at 12:20






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    The order doesn't matter because $P(A)$ is ultimately the sum of various conditional probabilities, and addition is both commutative and associative.
    $endgroup$
    – chepner
    Apr 18 at 14:04








1




1




$begingroup$
Usually the "nominator" is called numerator.
$endgroup$
– callculus
Apr 18 at 12:12




$begingroup$
Usually the "nominator" is called numerator.
$endgroup$
– callculus
Apr 18 at 12:12












$begingroup$
@callculus: yes, of, course, I need coffee :)
$endgroup$
– Vasya
Apr 18 at 12:20




$begingroup$
@callculus: yes, of, course, I need coffee :)
$endgroup$
– Vasya
Apr 18 at 12:20




2




2




$begingroup$
The order doesn't matter because $P(A)$ is ultimately the sum of various conditional probabilities, and addition is both commutative and associative.
$endgroup$
– chepner
Apr 18 at 14:04




$begingroup$
The order doesn't matter because $P(A)$ is ultimately the sum of various conditional probabilities, and addition is both commutative and associative.
$endgroup$
– chepner
Apr 18 at 14:04










4 Answers
4






active

oldest

votes


















6












$begingroup$

If you took into consideration the order, you would get the same result but the calculation would be a bit more difficult:




  • all possible sequences of $5$ balls respecting order (as if they were distinguishable): $10cdot 9cdot 8cdot 7 cdot 6$

  • all possible selections of $color{red}{2}$ out of $color{red}{6}$ red balls: $color{red}{binom{6}{2}}$

  • all possible selections of $color{green}{3}$ out of $color{green}{4}$ green balls: $color{green}{binom{4}{3}}$

  • all possible arrangements of the selected $color{red}{2}+color{green}{3}$ balls: $5!$


All together
$$frac{color{red}{binom{6}{2}}cdot color{green}{binom{4}{3}} cdot 5!}{10cdot 9cdot 8cdot 7 cdot 6} = frac{color{red}{binom{6}{2}}cdot color{green}{binom{4}{3}}}{frac{10!}{5!cdot 5!}}= frac{5}{21}$$






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$





















    9












    $begingroup$

    The probability of picking a red ball first and then a green ball is
    $$ frac{6}{10} cdot frac{4}{9} $$
    The probability of picking a green ball first and then a red ball is
    $$ frac{4}{10} cdot frac{6}{9} $$
    Notice that the numbers in the denominator are the same, while the numbers in
    the numerator are the same but in reverse order? Multiplication is commutative.



    Another way of looking at this: we don't care about the process you go through in picking the balls, as long as it is fair: each possible outcome (i.e. each possible subset of
    $5$ of the $10$ balls, where we consider the balls as in principle distinguishable) has the same probability. If this is the case, you just need to count the number of
    outcomes that belong to the event you're considering, and divide by the total number of
    outcomes.






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$









    • 1




      $begingroup$
      Thank you for the explanation, as I started writing it down I came to the same conclusion but it's very helpful to see the problem from a different perspective!
      $endgroup$
      – Vasya
      Apr 18 at 12:25



















    3












    $begingroup$

    You can comprehend the calculation in a simpler way with smaller numbers.




    Daniel randomly chooses balls from the group of $3$ red and $2$ green. What
    is the probability that he picks $2$ red and $2$ green if balls are drawn
    without replacement.




    Indeed we have to regard the order. There are $frac{4!}{2!cdot 2!}=6$ ways to draw 2 red and 2 green balls:



    $$color{green}gcolor{green}gcolor{red}rcolor{red}r, color{green}gcolor{red}rcolor{green}gcolor{red}r, color{green}gcolor{red}rcolor{red}rcolor{green}g, color{red}rcolor{green}gcolor{green}gcolor{red}r, color{red}rcolor{green}gcolor{red}rcolor{green}g, color{red}rcolor{red}rcolor{green}gcolor{green}g$$



    Each way has the same probability: $frac{3}{5}cdot frac{2}{4}cdot frac{2}{3}cdot frac{1}{2} quad (ggrr)$



    Multiplying with 6 (ways) we get $6cdot frac{3}{5}cdot frac{2}{4}cdot frac{2}{3}cdot frac{1}{2}=frac{3}5=0.6 $



    Using binomial coefficients we get $frac{binom{3}{2}cdot binom{2}{2}}{binom{5}{4}}=frac{3cdot 1}{5}=frac35=0.6$



    And we get the same result.






    share|cite|improve this answer











    $endgroup$





















      2












      $begingroup$

      There is a principle called "conservation of expected evidence" that says that if you have events A and B, then when you calculate the probability of A without knowing whether B happens, the result should be the same as the expected value of the probability over the possible results of B.



      In this case, let A be the probability that the second ball is red, and B be the probability the first one is green. The principle says that P(A) = P(A|B)P(B)+P(A|~B)P(~B). That is, if you split A into two cases of A and B versus A and not B, the total probability should just be the probability of A. If you roll a die and flip a coin, the probability of getting a 1 one the die should change if you split it into P(die=1,coin=heads) plus P(die=1,coin=tails).



      We have the following values for those probabilities:



      P(A) = $frac6{10}$

      P(A|B) = $frac5 9 $

      P(B) = $frac6{10}$

      P(A|~B) = $frac 6 9 $

      P(~B) = $frac 4 {10}$



      So the equation is $frac6{10} = frac5 9 frac6{10}+frac 6 9 frac 4 {10}=frac{30+24}{9*10} = frac{54}{9*10}=frac{9*6}{9*10}=frac 6 {10}$



      If you have ten cards, 6 red and 4 green, and you shuffle them, would the probability of the first one being red be any different from the probability of the second one being red?






      share|cite|improve this answer









      $endgroup$














        Your Answer








        StackExchange.ready(function() {
        var channelOptions = {
        tags: "".split(" "),
        id: "69"
        };
        initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

        StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
        // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
        if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
        StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
        createEditor();
        });
        }
        else {
        createEditor();
        }
        });

        function createEditor() {
        StackExchange.prepareEditor({
        heartbeatType: 'answer',
        autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
        convertImagesToLinks: true,
        noModals: true,
        showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
        reputationToPostImages: 10,
        bindNavPrevention: true,
        postfix: "",
        imageUploader: {
        brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
        contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
        allowUrls: true
        },
        noCode: true, onDemand: true,
        discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
        ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
        });


        }
        });














        draft saved

        draft discarded


















        StackExchange.ready(
        function () {
        StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3192310%2fdrawing-without-replacement-why-is-the-order-of-draw-irrelevant%23new-answer', 'question_page');
        }
        );

        Post as a guest















        Required, but never shown

























        4 Answers
        4






        active

        oldest

        votes








        4 Answers
        4






        active

        oldest

        votes









        active

        oldest

        votes






        active

        oldest

        votes









        6












        $begingroup$

        If you took into consideration the order, you would get the same result but the calculation would be a bit more difficult:




        • all possible sequences of $5$ balls respecting order (as if they were distinguishable): $10cdot 9cdot 8cdot 7 cdot 6$

        • all possible selections of $color{red}{2}$ out of $color{red}{6}$ red balls: $color{red}{binom{6}{2}}$

        • all possible selections of $color{green}{3}$ out of $color{green}{4}$ green balls: $color{green}{binom{4}{3}}$

        • all possible arrangements of the selected $color{red}{2}+color{green}{3}$ balls: $5!$


        All together
        $$frac{color{red}{binom{6}{2}}cdot color{green}{binom{4}{3}} cdot 5!}{10cdot 9cdot 8cdot 7 cdot 6} = frac{color{red}{binom{6}{2}}cdot color{green}{binom{4}{3}}}{frac{10!}{5!cdot 5!}}= frac{5}{21}$$






        share|cite|improve this answer









        $endgroup$


















          6












          $begingroup$

          If you took into consideration the order, you would get the same result but the calculation would be a bit more difficult:




          • all possible sequences of $5$ balls respecting order (as if they were distinguishable): $10cdot 9cdot 8cdot 7 cdot 6$

          • all possible selections of $color{red}{2}$ out of $color{red}{6}$ red balls: $color{red}{binom{6}{2}}$

          • all possible selections of $color{green}{3}$ out of $color{green}{4}$ green balls: $color{green}{binom{4}{3}}$

          • all possible arrangements of the selected $color{red}{2}+color{green}{3}$ balls: $5!$


          All together
          $$frac{color{red}{binom{6}{2}}cdot color{green}{binom{4}{3}} cdot 5!}{10cdot 9cdot 8cdot 7 cdot 6} = frac{color{red}{binom{6}{2}}cdot color{green}{binom{4}{3}}}{frac{10!}{5!cdot 5!}}= frac{5}{21}$$






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$
















            6












            6








            6





            $begingroup$

            If you took into consideration the order, you would get the same result but the calculation would be a bit more difficult:




            • all possible sequences of $5$ balls respecting order (as if they were distinguishable): $10cdot 9cdot 8cdot 7 cdot 6$

            • all possible selections of $color{red}{2}$ out of $color{red}{6}$ red balls: $color{red}{binom{6}{2}}$

            • all possible selections of $color{green}{3}$ out of $color{green}{4}$ green balls: $color{green}{binom{4}{3}}$

            • all possible arrangements of the selected $color{red}{2}+color{green}{3}$ balls: $5!$


            All together
            $$frac{color{red}{binom{6}{2}}cdot color{green}{binom{4}{3}} cdot 5!}{10cdot 9cdot 8cdot 7 cdot 6} = frac{color{red}{binom{6}{2}}cdot color{green}{binom{4}{3}}}{frac{10!}{5!cdot 5!}}= frac{5}{21}$$






            share|cite|improve this answer









            $endgroup$



            If you took into consideration the order, you would get the same result but the calculation would be a bit more difficult:




            • all possible sequences of $5$ balls respecting order (as if they were distinguishable): $10cdot 9cdot 8cdot 7 cdot 6$

            • all possible selections of $color{red}{2}$ out of $color{red}{6}$ red balls: $color{red}{binom{6}{2}}$

            • all possible selections of $color{green}{3}$ out of $color{green}{4}$ green balls: $color{green}{binom{4}{3}}$

            • all possible arrangements of the selected $color{red}{2}+color{green}{3}$ balls: $5!$


            All together
            $$frac{color{red}{binom{6}{2}}cdot color{green}{binom{4}{3}} cdot 5!}{10cdot 9cdot 8cdot 7 cdot 6} = frac{color{red}{binom{6}{2}}cdot color{green}{binom{4}{3}}}{frac{10!}{5!cdot 5!}}= frac{5}{21}$$







            share|cite|improve this answer












            share|cite|improve this answer



            share|cite|improve this answer










            answered Apr 18 at 12:22









            trancelocationtrancelocation

            14.7k1929




            14.7k1929























                9












                $begingroup$

                The probability of picking a red ball first and then a green ball is
                $$ frac{6}{10} cdot frac{4}{9} $$
                The probability of picking a green ball first and then a red ball is
                $$ frac{4}{10} cdot frac{6}{9} $$
                Notice that the numbers in the denominator are the same, while the numbers in
                the numerator are the same but in reverse order? Multiplication is commutative.



                Another way of looking at this: we don't care about the process you go through in picking the balls, as long as it is fair: each possible outcome (i.e. each possible subset of
                $5$ of the $10$ balls, where we consider the balls as in principle distinguishable) has the same probability. If this is the case, you just need to count the number of
                outcomes that belong to the event you're considering, and divide by the total number of
                outcomes.






                share|cite|improve this answer









                $endgroup$









                • 1




                  $begingroup$
                  Thank you for the explanation, as I started writing it down I came to the same conclusion but it's very helpful to see the problem from a different perspective!
                  $endgroup$
                  – Vasya
                  Apr 18 at 12:25
















                9












                $begingroup$

                The probability of picking a red ball first and then a green ball is
                $$ frac{6}{10} cdot frac{4}{9} $$
                The probability of picking a green ball first and then a red ball is
                $$ frac{4}{10} cdot frac{6}{9} $$
                Notice that the numbers in the denominator are the same, while the numbers in
                the numerator are the same but in reverse order? Multiplication is commutative.



                Another way of looking at this: we don't care about the process you go through in picking the balls, as long as it is fair: each possible outcome (i.e. each possible subset of
                $5$ of the $10$ balls, where we consider the balls as in principle distinguishable) has the same probability. If this is the case, you just need to count the number of
                outcomes that belong to the event you're considering, and divide by the total number of
                outcomes.






                share|cite|improve this answer









                $endgroup$









                • 1




                  $begingroup$
                  Thank you for the explanation, as I started writing it down I came to the same conclusion but it's very helpful to see the problem from a different perspective!
                  $endgroup$
                  – Vasya
                  Apr 18 at 12:25














                9












                9








                9





                $begingroup$

                The probability of picking a red ball first and then a green ball is
                $$ frac{6}{10} cdot frac{4}{9} $$
                The probability of picking a green ball first and then a red ball is
                $$ frac{4}{10} cdot frac{6}{9} $$
                Notice that the numbers in the denominator are the same, while the numbers in
                the numerator are the same but in reverse order? Multiplication is commutative.



                Another way of looking at this: we don't care about the process you go through in picking the balls, as long as it is fair: each possible outcome (i.e. each possible subset of
                $5$ of the $10$ balls, where we consider the balls as in principle distinguishable) has the same probability. If this is the case, you just need to count the number of
                outcomes that belong to the event you're considering, and divide by the total number of
                outcomes.






                share|cite|improve this answer









                $endgroup$



                The probability of picking a red ball first and then a green ball is
                $$ frac{6}{10} cdot frac{4}{9} $$
                The probability of picking a green ball first and then a red ball is
                $$ frac{4}{10} cdot frac{6}{9} $$
                Notice that the numbers in the denominator are the same, while the numbers in
                the numerator are the same but in reverse order? Multiplication is commutative.



                Another way of looking at this: we don't care about the process you go through in picking the balls, as long as it is fair: each possible outcome (i.e. each possible subset of
                $5$ of the $10$ balls, where we consider the balls as in principle distinguishable) has the same probability. If this is the case, you just need to count the number of
                outcomes that belong to the event you're considering, and divide by the total number of
                outcomes.







                share|cite|improve this answer












                share|cite|improve this answer



                share|cite|improve this answer










                answered Apr 18 at 12:20









                Robert IsraelRobert Israel

                333k23223484




                333k23223484








                • 1




                  $begingroup$
                  Thank you for the explanation, as I started writing it down I came to the same conclusion but it's very helpful to see the problem from a different perspective!
                  $endgroup$
                  – Vasya
                  Apr 18 at 12:25














                • 1




                  $begingroup$
                  Thank you for the explanation, as I started writing it down I came to the same conclusion but it's very helpful to see the problem from a different perspective!
                  $endgroup$
                  – Vasya
                  Apr 18 at 12:25








                1




                1




                $begingroup$
                Thank you for the explanation, as I started writing it down I came to the same conclusion but it's very helpful to see the problem from a different perspective!
                $endgroup$
                – Vasya
                Apr 18 at 12:25




                $begingroup$
                Thank you for the explanation, as I started writing it down I came to the same conclusion but it's very helpful to see the problem from a different perspective!
                $endgroup$
                – Vasya
                Apr 18 at 12:25











                3












                $begingroup$

                You can comprehend the calculation in a simpler way with smaller numbers.




                Daniel randomly chooses balls from the group of $3$ red and $2$ green. What
                is the probability that he picks $2$ red and $2$ green if balls are drawn
                without replacement.




                Indeed we have to regard the order. There are $frac{4!}{2!cdot 2!}=6$ ways to draw 2 red and 2 green balls:



                $$color{green}gcolor{green}gcolor{red}rcolor{red}r, color{green}gcolor{red}rcolor{green}gcolor{red}r, color{green}gcolor{red}rcolor{red}rcolor{green}g, color{red}rcolor{green}gcolor{green}gcolor{red}r, color{red}rcolor{green}gcolor{red}rcolor{green}g, color{red}rcolor{red}rcolor{green}gcolor{green}g$$



                Each way has the same probability: $frac{3}{5}cdot frac{2}{4}cdot frac{2}{3}cdot frac{1}{2} quad (ggrr)$



                Multiplying with 6 (ways) we get $6cdot frac{3}{5}cdot frac{2}{4}cdot frac{2}{3}cdot frac{1}{2}=frac{3}5=0.6 $



                Using binomial coefficients we get $frac{binom{3}{2}cdot binom{2}{2}}{binom{5}{4}}=frac{3cdot 1}{5}=frac35=0.6$



                And we get the same result.






                share|cite|improve this answer











                $endgroup$


















                  3












                  $begingroup$

                  You can comprehend the calculation in a simpler way with smaller numbers.




                  Daniel randomly chooses balls from the group of $3$ red and $2$ green. What
                  is the probability that he picks $2$ red and $2$ green if balls are drawn
                  without replacement.




                  Indeed we have to regard the order. There are $frac{4!}{2!cdot 2!}=6$ ways to draw 2 red and 2 green balls:



                  $$color{green}gcolor{green}gcolor{red}rcolor{red}r, color{green}gcolor{red}rcolor{green}gcolor{red}r, color{green}gcolor{red}rcolor{red}rcolor{green}g, color{red}rcolor{green}gcolor{green}gcolor{red}r, color{red}rcolor{green}gcolor{red}rcolor{green}g, color{red}rcolor{red}rcolor{green}gcolor{green}g$$



                  Each way has the same probability: $frac{3}{5}cdot frac{2}{4}cdot frac{2}{3}cdot frac{1}{2} quad (ggrr)$



                  Multiplying with 6 (ways) we get $6cdot frac{3}{5}cdot frac{2}{4}cdot frac{2}{3}cdot frac{1}{2}=frac{3}5=0.6 $



                  Using binomial coefficients we get $frac{binom{3}{2}cdot binom{2}{2}}{binom{5}{4}}=frac{3cdot 1}{5}=frac35=0.6$



                  And we get the same result.






                  share|cite|improve this answer











                  $endgroup$
















                    3












                    3








                    3





                    $begingroup$

                    You can comprehend the calculation in a simpler way with smaller numbers.




                    Daniel randomly chooses balls from the group of $3$ red and $2$ green. What
                    is the probability that he picks $2$ red and $2$ green if balls are drawn
                    without replacement.




                    Indeed we have to regard the order. There are $frac{4!}{2!cdot 2!}=6$ ways to draw 2 red and 2 green balls:



                    $$color{green}gcolor{green}gcolor{red}rcolor{red}r, color{green}gcolor{red}rcolor{green}gcolor{red}r, color{green}gcolor{red}rcolor{red}rcolor{green}g, color{red}rcolor{green}gcolor{green}gcolor{red}r, color{red}rcolor{green}gcolor{red}rcolor{green}g, color{red}rcolor{red}rcolor{green}gcolor{green}g$$



                    Each way has the same probability: $frac{3}{5}cdot frac{2}{4}cdot frac{2}{3}cdot frac{1}{2} quad (ggrr)$



                    Multiplying with 6 (ways) we get $6cdot frac{3}{5}cdot frac{2}{4}cdot frac{2}{3}cdot frac{1}{2}=frac{3}5=0.6 $



                    Using binomial coefficients we get $frac{binom{3}{2}cdot binom{2}{2}}{binom{5}{4}}=frac{3cdot 1}{5}=frac35=0.6$



                    And we get the same result.






                    share|cite|improve this answer











                    $endgroup$



                    You can comprehend the calculation in a simpler way with smaller numbers.




                    Daniel randomly chooses balls from the group of $3$ red and $2$ green. What
                    is the probability that he picks $2$ red and $2$ green if balls are drawn
                    without replacement.




                    Indeed we have to regard the order. There are $frac{4!}{2!cdot 2!}=6$ ways to draw 2 red and 2 green balls:



                    $$color{green}gcolor{green}gcolor{red}rcolor{red}r, color{green}gcolor{red}rcolor{green}gcolor{red}r, color{green}gcolor{red}rcolor{red}rcolor{green}g, color{red}rcolor{green}gcolor{green}gcolor{red}r, color{red}rcolor{green}gcolor{red}rcolor{green}g, color{red}rcolor{red}rcolor{green}gcolor{green}g$$



                    Each way has the same probability: $frac{3}{5}cdot frac{2}{4}cdot frac{2}{3}cdot frac{1}{2} quad (ggrr)$



                    Multiplying with 6 (ways) we get $6cdot frac{3}{5}cdot frac{2}{4}cdot frac{2}{3}cdot frac{1}{2}=frac{3}5=0.6 $



                    Using binomial coefficients we get $frac{binom{3}{2}cdot binom{2}{2}}{binom{5}{4}}=frac{3cdot 1}{5}=frac35=0.6$



                    And we get the same result.







                    share|cite|improve this answer














                    share|cite|improve this answer



                    share|cite|improve this answer








                    edited Apr 18 at 12:35

























                    answered Apr 18 at 12:30









                    callculuscallculus

                    19k31731




                    19k31731























                        2












                        $begingroup$

                        There is a principle called "conservation of expected evidence" that says that if you have events A and B, then when you calculate the probability of A without knowing whether B happens, the result should be the same as the expected value of the probability over the possible results of B.



                        In this case, let A be the probability that the second ball is red, and B be the probability the first one is green. The principle says that P(A) = P(A|B)P(B)+P(A|~B)P(~B). That is, if you split A into two cases of A and B versus A and not B, the total probability should just be the probability of A. If you roll a die and flip a coin, the probability of getting a 1 one the die should change if you split it into P(die=1,coin=heads) plus P(die=1,coin=tails).



                        We have the following values for those probabilities:



                        P(A) = $frac6{10}$

                        P(A|B) = $frac5 9 $

                        P(B) = $frac6{10}$

                        P(A|~B) = $frac 6 9 $

                        P(~B) = $frac 4 {10}$



                        So the equation is $frac6{10} = frac5 9 frac6{10}+frac 6 9 frac 4 {10}=frac{30+24}{9*10} = frac{54}{9*10}=frac{9*6}{9*10}=frac 6 {10}$



                        If you have ten cards, 6 red and 4 green, and you shuffle them, would the probability of the first one being red be any different from the probability of the second one being red?






                        share|cite|improve this answer









                        $endgroup$


















                          2












                          $begingroup$

                          There is a principle called "conservation of expected evidence" that says that if you have events A and B, then when you calculate the probability of A without knowing whether B happens, the result should be the same as the expected value of the probability over the possible results of B.



                          In this case, let A be the probability that the second ball is red, and B be the probability the first one is green. The principle says that P(A) = P(A|B)P(B)+P(A|~B)P(~B). That is, if you split A into two cases of A and B versus A and not B, the total probability should just be the probability of A. If you roll a die and flip a coin, the probability of getting a 1 one the die should change if you split it into P(die=1,coin=heads) plus P(die=1,coin=tails).



                          We have the following values for those probabilities:



                          P(A) = $frac6{10}$

                          P(A|B) = $frac5 9 $

                          P(B) = $frac6{10}$

                          P(A|~B) = $frac 6 9 $

                          P(~B) = $frac 4 {10}$



                          So the equation is $frac6{10} = frac5 9 frac6{10}+frac 6 9 frac 4 {10}=frac{30+24}{9*10} = frac{54}{9*10}=frac{9*6}{9*10}=frac 6 {10}$



                          If you have ten cards, 6 red and 4 green, and you shuffle them, would the probability of the first one being red be any different from the probability of the second one being red?






                          share|cite|improve this answer









                          $endgroup$
















                            2












                            2








                            2





                            $begingroup$

                            There is a principle called "conservation of expected evidence" that says that if you have events A and B, then when you calculate the probability of A without knowing whether B happens, the result should be the same as the expected value of the probability over the possible results of B.



                            In this case, let A be the probability that the second ball is red, and B be the probability the first one is green. The principle says that P(A) = P(A|B)P(B)+P(A|~B)P(~B). That is, if you split A into two cases of A and B versus A and not B, the total probability should just be the probability of A. If you roll a die and flip a coin, the probability of getting a 1 one the die should change if you split it into P(die=1,coin=heads) plus P(die=1,coin=tails).



                            We have the following values for those probabilities:



                            P(A) = $frac6{10}$

                            P(A|B) = $frac5 9 $

                            P(B) = $frac6{10}$

                            P(A|~B) = $frac 6 9 $

                            P(~B) = $frac 4 {10}$



                            So the equation is $frac6{10} = frac5 9 frac6{10}+frac 6 9 frac 4 {10}=frac{30+24}{9*10} = frac{54}{9*10}=frac{9*6}{9*10}=frac 6 {10}$



                            If you have ten cards, 6 red and 4 green, and you shuffle them, would the probability of the first one being red be any different from the probability of the second one being red?






                            share|cite|improve this answer









                            $endgroup$



                            There is a principle called "conservation of expected evidence" that says that if you have events A and B, then when you calculate the probability of A without knowing whether B happens, the result should be the same as the expected value of the probability over the possible results of B.



                            In this case, let A be the probability that the second ball is red, and B be the probability the first one is green. The principle says that P(A) = P(A|B)P(B)+P(A|~B)P(~B). That is, if you split A into two cases of A and B versus A and not B, the total probability should just be the probability of A. If you roll a die and flip a coin, the probability of getting a 1 one the die should change if you split it into P(die=1,coin=heads) plus P(die=1,coin=tails).



                            We have the following values for those probabilities:



                            P(A) = $frac6{10}$

                            P(A|B) = $frac5 9 $

                            P(B) = $frac6{10}$

                            P(A|~B) = $frac 6 9 $

                            P(~B) = $frac 4 {10}$



                            So the equation is $frac6{10} = frac5 9 frac6{10}+frac 6 9 frac 4 {10}=frac{30+24}{9*10} = frac{54}{9*10}=frac{9*6}{9*10}=frac 6 {10}$



                            If you have ten cards, 6 red and 4 green, and you shuffle them, would the probability of the first one being red be any different from the probability of the second one being red?







                            share|cite|improve this answer












                            share|cite|improve this answer



                            share|cite|improve this answer










                            answered Apr 18 at 15:17









                            AcccumulationAcccumulation

                            7,4612619




                            7,4612619






























                                draft saved

                                draft discarded




















































                                Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


                                • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                                But avoid



                                • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                                • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                                Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                                To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                                draft saved


                                draft discarded














                                StackExchange.ready(
                                function () {
                                StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3192310%2fdrawing-without-replacement-why-is-the-order-of-draw-irrelevant%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                                }
                                );

                                Post as a guest















                                Required, but never shown





















































                                Required, but never shown














                                Required, but never shown












                                Required, but never shown







                                Required, but never shown

































                                Required, but never shown














                                Required, but never shown












                                Required, but never shown







                                Required, but never shown







                                Popular posts from this blog

                                Bruad Bilen | Luke uk diar | NawigatsjuunCommonskategorii: BruadCommonskategorii: RunstükenWikiquote: Bruad

                                What is the offset in a seaplane's hull?

                                Slayer Innehåll Historia | Stil, komposition och lyrik | Bandets betydelse och framgångar | Sidoprojekt och samarbeten | Kontroverser | Medlemmar | Utmärkelser och nomineringar | Turnéer och festivaler | Diskografi | Referenser | Externa länkar | Navigeringsmenywww.slayer.net”Metal Massacre vol. 1””Metal Massacre vol. 3””Metal Massacre Volume III””Show No Mercy””Haunting the Chapel””Live Undead””Hell Awaits””Reign in Blood””Reign in Blood””Gold & Platinum – Reign in Blood””Golden Gods Awards Winners”originalet”Kerrang! Hall Of Fame””Slayer Looks Back On 37-Year Career In New Video Series: Part Two””South of Heaven””Gold & Platinum – South of Heaven””Seasons in the Abyss””Gold & Platinum - Seasons in the Abyss””Divine Intervention””Divine Intervention - Release group by Slayer””Gold & Platinum - Divine Intervention””Live Intrusion””Undisputed Attitude””Abolish Government/Superficial Love””Release “Slatanic Slaughter: A Tribute to Slayer” by Various Artists””Diabolus in Musica””Soundtrack to the Apocalypse””God Hates Us All””Systematic - Relationships””War at the Warfield””Gold & Platinum - War at the Warfield””Soundtrack to the Apocalypse””Gold & Platinum - Still Reigning””Metallica, Slayer, Iron Mauden Among Winners At Metal Hammer Awards””Eternal Pyre””Eternal Pyre - Slayer release group””Eternal Pyre””Metal Storm Awards 2006””Kerrang! Hall Of Fame””Slayer Wins 'Best Metal' Grammy Award””Slayer Guitarist Jeff Hanneman Dies””Bullet-For My Valentine booed at Metal Hammer Golden Gods Awards””Unholy Aliance””The End Of Slayer?””Slayer: We Could Thrash Out Two More Albums If We're Fast Enough...””'The Unholy Alliance: Chapter III' UK Dates Added”originalet”Megadeth And Slayer To Co-Headline 'Canadian Carnage' Trek”originalet”World Painted Blood””Release “World Painted Blood” by Slayer””Metallica Heading To Cinemas””Slayer, Megadeth To Join Forces For 'European Carnage' Tour - Dec. 18, 2010”originalet”Slayer's Hanneman Contracts Acute Infection; Band To Bring In Guest Guitarist””Cannibal Corpse's Pat O'Brien Will Step In As Slayer's Guest Guitarist”originalet”Slayer’s Jeff Hanneman Dead at 49””Dave Lombardo Says He Made Only $67,000 In 2011 While Touring With Slayer””Slayer: We Do Not Agree With Dave Lombardo's Substance Or Timeline Of Events””Slayer Welcomes Drummer Paul Bostaph Back To The Fold””Slayer Hope to Unveil Never-Before-Heard Jeff Hanneman Material on Next Album””Slayer Debut New Song 'Implode' During Surprise Golden Gods Appearance””Release group Repentless by Slayer””Repentless - Slayer - Credits””Slayer””Metal Storm Awards 2015””Slayer - to release comic book "Repentless #1"””Slayer To Release 'Repentless' 6.66" Vinyl Box Set””BREAKING NEWS: Slayer Announce Farewell Tour””Slayer Recruit Lamb of God, Anthrax, Behemoth + Testament for Final Tour””Slayer lägger ner efter 37 år””Slayer Announces Second North American Leg Of 'Final' Tour””Final World Tour””Slayer Announces Final European Tour With Lamb of God, Anthrax And Obituary””Slayer To Tour Europe With Lamb of God, Anthrax And Obituary””Slayer To Play 'Last French Show Ever' At Next Year's Hellfst””Slayer's Final World Tour Will Extend Into 2019””Death Angel's Rob Cavestany On Slayer's 'Farewell' Tour: 'Some Of Us Could See This Coming'””Testament Has No Plans To Retire Anytime Soon, Says Chuck Billy””Anthrax's Scott Ian On Slayer's 'Farewell' Tour Plans: 'I Was Surprised And I Wasn't Surprised'””Slayer””Slayer's Morbid Schlock””Review/Rock; For Slayer, the Mania Is the Message””Slayer - Biography””Slayer - Reign In Blood”originalet”Dave Lombardo””An exclusive oral history of Slayer”originalet”Exclusive! Interview With Slayer Guitarist Jeff Hanneman”originalet”Thinking Out Loud: Slayer's Kerry King on hair metal, Satan and being polite””Slayer Lyrics””Slayer - Biography””Most influential artists for extreme metal music””Slayer - Reign in Blood””Slayer guitarist Jeff Hanneman dies aged 49””Slatanic Slaughter: A Tribute to Slayer””Gateway to Hell: A Tribute to Slayer””Covered In Blood””Slayer: The Origins of Thrash in San Francisco, CA.””Why They Rule - #6 Slayer”originalet”Guitar World's 100 Greatest Heavy Metal Guitarists Of All Time”originalet”The fans have spoken: Slayer comes out on top in readers' polls”originalet”Tribute to Jeff Hanneman (1964-2013)””Lamb Of God Frontman: We Sound Like A Slayer Rip-Off””BEHEMOTH Frontman Pays Tribute To SLAYER's JEFF HANNEMAN””Slayer, Hatebreed Doing Double Duty On This Year's Ozzfest””System of a Down””Lacuna Coil’s Andrea Ferro Talks Influences, Skateboarding, Band Origins + More””Slayer - Reign in Blood””Into The Lungs of Hell””Slayer rules - en utställning om fans””Slayer and Their Fans Slashed Through a No-Holds-Barred Night at Gas Monkey””Home””Slayer””Gold & Platinum - The Big 4 Live from Sofia, Bulgaria””Exclusive! Interview With Slayer Guitarist Kerry King””2008-02-23: Wiltern, Los Angeles, CA, USA””Slayer's Kerry King To Perform With Megadeth Tonight! - Oct. 21, 2010”originalet”Dave Lombardo - Biography”Slayer Case DismissedArkiveradUltimate Classic Rock: Slayer guitarist Jeff Hanneman dead at 49.”Slayer: "We could never do any thing like Some Kind Of Monster..."””Cannibal Corpse'S Pat O'Brien Will Step In As Slayer'S Guest Guitarist | The Official Slayer Site”originalet”Slayer Wins 'Best Metal' Grammy Award””Slayer Guitarist Jeff Hanneman Dies””Kerrang! Awards 2006 Blog: Kerrang! Hall Of Fame””Kerrang! Awards 2013: Kerrang! Legend”originalet”Metallica, Slayer, Iron Maien Among Winners At Metal Hammer Awards””Metal Hammer Golden Gods Awards””Bullet For My Valentine Booed At Metal Hammer Golden Gods Awards””Metal Storm Awards 2006””Metal Storm Awards 2015””Slayer's Concert History””Slayer - Relationships””Slayer - Releases”Slayers officiella webbplatsSlayer på MusicBrainzOfficiell webbplatsSlayerSlayerr1373445760000 0001 1540 47353068615-5086262726cb13906545x(data)6033143kn20030215029