Drawing without replacement: why is the order of draw irrelevant?
$begingroup$
I am trying to wrap my head around this problem:
Daniel randomly chooses balls from the group of $6$ red and $4$ green. What is the probability that he picks $2$ red and $3$ green if balls are drawn without replacement.
What I remember from my college days that the probability is found by this formula:
$$P(A)=frac{binom{6}{2}binom{4}{3}}{binom{10}{5}}=frac{5}{21}$$
Is this correct? I am trying to understand why this works. Wouldn't probability depend on the order of balls drawn as the number of balls is changing after each draw? I get how we obtain numerator and denominator, I just feel that the probability should be dependent on the order. For example, the probability to pick red first is $frac{6}{10}$ so the probability for the second draw becomes $frac{5}{9}$ for red and $frac{4}{9}$ for green. But if the first picked ball is green, the probability for the second draw becomes $frac{6}{9}$ for red and $frac{3}{9}$ for green. What am I missing?
probability probability-theory
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I am trying to wrap my head around this problem:
Daniel randomly chooses balls from the group of $6$ red and $4$ green. What is the probability that he picks $2$ red and $3$ green if balls are drawn without replacement.
What I remember from my college days that the probability is found by this formula:
$$P(A)=frac{binom{6}{2}binom{4}{3}}{binom{10}{5}}=frac{5}{21}$$
Is this correct? I am trying to understand why this works. Wouldn't probability depend on the order of balls drawn as the number of balls is changing after each draw? I get how we obtain numerator and denominator, I just feel that the probability should be dependent on the order. For example, the probability to pick red first is $frac{6}{10}$ so the probability for the second draw becomes $frac{5}{9}$ for red and $frac{4}{9}$ for green. But if the first picked ball is green, the probability for the second draw becomes $frac{6}{9}$ for red and $frac{3}{9}$ for green. What am I missing?
probability probability-theory
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
Usually the "nominator" is called numerator.
$endgroup$
– callculus
Apr 18 at 12:12
$begingroup$
@callculus: yes, of, course, I need coffee :)
$endgroup$
– Vasya
Apr 18 at 12:20
2
$begingroup$
The order doesn't matter because $P(A)$ is ultimately the sum of various conditional probabilities, and addition is both commutative and associative.
$endgroup$
– chepner
Apr 18 at 14:04
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I am trying to wrap my head around this problem:
Daniel randomly chooses balls from the group of $6$ red and $4$ green. What is the probability that he picks $2$ red and $3$ green if balls are drawn without replacement.
What I remember from my college days that the probability is found by this formula:
$$P(A)=frac{binom{6}{2}binom{4}{3}}{binom{10}{5}}=frac{5}{21}$$
Is this correct? I am trying to understand why this works. Wouldn't probability depend on the order of balls drawn as the number of balls is changing after each draw? I get how we obtain numerator and denominator, I just feel that the probability should be dependent on the order. For example, the probability to pick red first is $frac{6}{10}$ so the probability for the second draw becomes $frac{5}{9}$ for red and $frac{4}{9}$ for green. But if the first picked ball is green, the probability for the second draw becomes $frac{6}{9}$ for red and $frac{3}{9}$ for green. What am I missing?
probability probability-theory
$endgroup$
I am trying to wrap my head around this problem:
Daniel randomly chooses balls from the group of $6$ red and $4$ green. What is the probability that he picks $2$ red and $3$ green if balls are drawn without replacement.
What I remember from my college days that the probability is found by this formula:
$$P(A)=frac{binom{6}{2}binom{4}{3}}{binom{10}{5}}=frac{5}{21}$$
Is this correct? I am trying to understand why this works. Wouldn't probability depend on the order of balls drawn as the number of balls is changing after each draw? I get how we obtain numerator and denominator, I just feel that the probability should be dependent on the order. For example, the probability to pick red first is $frac{6}{10}$ so the probability for the second draw becomes $frac{5}{9}$ for red and $frac{4}{9}$ for green. But if the first picked ball is green, the probability for the second draw becomes $frac{6}{9}$ for red and $frac{3}{9}$ for green. What am I missing?
probability probability-theory
probability probability-theory
edited Apr 18 at 22:10
JeffC
1053
1053
asked Apr 18 at 12:05
VasyaVasya
4,5971619
4,5971619
1
$begingroup$
Usually the "nominator" is called numerator.
$endgroup$
– callculus
Apr 18 at 12:12
$begingroup$
@callculus: yes, of, course, I need coffee :)
$endgroup$
– Vasya
Apr 18 at 12:20
2
$begingroup$
The order doesn't matter because $P(A)$ is ultimately the sum of various conditional probabilities, and addition is both commutative and associative.
$endgroup$
– chepner
Apr 18 at 14:04
add a comment |
1
$begingroup$
Usually the "nominator" is called numerator.
$endgroup$
– callculus
Apr 18 at 12:12
$begingroup$
@callculus: yes, of, course, I need coffee :)
$endgroup$
– Vasya
Apr 18 at 12:20
2
$begingroup$
The order doesn't matter because $P(A)$ is ultimately the sum of various conditional probabilities, and addition is both commutative and associative.
$endgroup$
– chepner
Apr 18 at 14:04
1
1
$begingroup$
Usually the "nominator" is called numerator.
$endgroup$
– callculus
Apr 18 at 12:12
$begingroup$
Usually the "nominator" is called numerator.
$endgroup$
– callculus
Apr 18 at 12:12
$begingroup$
@callculus: yes, of, course, I need coffee :)
$endgroup$
– Vasya
Apr 18 at 12:20
$begingroup$
@callculus: yes, of, course, I need coffee :)
$endgroup$
– Vasya
Apr 18 at 12:20
2
2
$begingroup$
The order doesn't matter because $P(A)$ is ultimately the sum of various conditional probabilities, and addition is both commutative and associative.
$endgroup$
– chepner
Apr 18 at 14:04
$begingroup$
The order doesn't matter because $P(A)$ is ultimately the sum of various conditional probabilities, and addition is both commutative and associative.
$endgroup$
– chepner
Apr 18 at 14:04
add a comment |
4 Answers
4
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
If you took into consideration the order, you would get the same result but the calculation would be a bit more difficult:
- all possible sequences of $5$ balls respecting order (as if they were distinguishable): $10cdot 9cdot 8cdot 7 cdot 6$
- all possible selections of $color{red}{2}$ out of $color{red}{6}$ red balls: $color{red}{binom{6}{2}}$
- all possible selections of $color{green}{3}$ out of $color{green}{4}$ green balls: $color{green}{binom{4}{3}}$
- all possible arrangements of the selected $color{red}{2}+color{green}{3}$ balls: $5!$
All together
$$frac{color{red}{binom{6}{2}}cdot color{green}{binom{4}{3}} cdot 5!}{10cdot 9cdot 8cdot 7 cdot 6} = frac{color{red}{binom{6}{2}}cdot color{green}{binom{4}{3}}}{frac{10!}{5!cdot 5!}}= frac{5}{21}$$
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The probability of picking a red ball first and then a green ball is
$$ frac{6}{10} cdot frac{4}{9} $$
The probability of picking a green ball first and then a red ball is
$$ frac{4}{10} cdot frac{6}{9} $$
Notice that the numbers in the denominator are the same, while the numbers in
the numerator are the same but in reverse order? Multiplication is commutative.
Another way of looking at this: we don't care about the process you go through in picking the balls, as long as it is fair: each possible outcome (i.e. each possible subset of
$5$ of the $10$ balls, where we consider the balls as in principle distinguishable) has the same probability. If this is the case, you just need to count the number of
outcomes that belong to the event you're considering, and divide by the total number of
outcomes.
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
Thank you for the explanation, as I started writing it down I came to the same conclusion but it's very helpful to see the problem from a different perspective!
$endgroup$
– Vasya
Apr 18 at 12:25
add a comment |
$begingroup$
You can comprehend the calculation in a simpler way with smaller numbers.
Daniel randomly chooses balls from the group of $3$ red and $2$ green. What
is the probability that he picks $2$ red and $2$ green if balls are drawn
without replacement.
Indeed we have to regard the order. There are $frac{4!}{2!cdot 2!}=6$ ways to draw 2 red and 2 green balls:
$$color{green}gcolor{green}gcolor{red}rcolor{red}r, color{green}gcolor{red}rcolor{green}gcolor{red}r, color{green}gcolor{red}rcolor{red}rcolor{green}g, color{red}rcolor{green}gcolor{green}gcolor{red}r, color{red}rcolor{green}gcolor{red}rcolor{green}g, color{red}rcolor{red}rcolor{green}gcolor{green}g$$
Each way has the same probability: $frac{3}{5}cdot frac{2}{4}cdot frac{2}{3}cdot frac{1}{2} quad (ggrr)$
Multiplying with 6 (ways) we get $6cdot frac{3}{5}cdot frac{2}{4}cdot frac{2}{3}cdot frac{1}{2}=frac{3}5=0.6 $
Using binomial coefficients we get $frac{binom{3}{2}cdot binom{2}{2}}{binom{5}{4}}=frac{3cdot 1}{5}=frac35=0.6$
And we get the same result.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
There is a principle called "conservation of expected evidence" that says that if you have events A and B, then when you calculate the probability of A without knowing whether B happens, the result should be the same as the expected value of the probability over the possible results of B.
In this case, let A be the probability that the second ball is red, and B be the probability the first one is green. The principle says that P(A) = P(A|B)P(B)+P(A|~B)P(~B). That is, if you split A into two cases of A and B versus A and not B, the total probability should just be the probability of A. If you roll a die and flip a coin, the probability of getting a 1 one the die should change if you split it into P(die=1,coin=heads) plus P(die=1,coin=tails).
We have the following values for those probabilities:
P(A) = $frac6{10}$
P(A|B) = $frac5 9 $
P(B) = $frac6{10}$
P(A|~B) = $frac 6 9 $
P(~B) = $frac 4 {10}$
So the equation is $frac6{10} = frac5 9 frac6{10}+frac 6 9 frac 4 {10}=frac{30+24}{9*10} = frac{54}{9*10}=frac{9*6}{9*10}=frac 6 {10}$
If you have ten cards, 6 red and 4 green, and you shuffle them, would the probability of the first one being red be any different from the probability of the second one being red?
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3192310%2fdrawing-without-replacement-why-is-the-order-of-draw-irrelevant%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
4 Answers
4
active
oldest
votes
4 Answers
4
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
If you took into consideration the order, you would get the same result but the calculation would be a bit more difficult:
- all possible sequences of $5$ balls respecting order (as if they were distinguishable): $10cdot 9cdot 8cdot 7 cdot 6$
- all possible selections of $color{red}{2}$ out of $color{red}{6}$ red balls: $color{red}{binom{6}{2}}$
- all possible selections of $color{green}{3}$ out of $color{green}{4}$ green balls: $color{green}{binom{4}{3}}$
- all possible arrangements of the selected $color{red}{2}+color{green}{3}$ balls: $5!$
All together
$$frac{color{red}{binom{6}{2}}cdot color{green}{binom{4}{3}} cdot 5!}{10cdot 9cdot 8cdot 7 cdot 6} = frac{color{red}{binom{6}{2}}cdot color{green}{binom{4}{3}}}{frac{10!}{5!cdot 5!}}= frac{5}{21}$$
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
If you took into consideration the order, you would get the same result but the calculation would be a bit more difficult:
- all possible sequences of $5$ balls respecting order (as if they were distinguishable): $10cdot 9cdot 8cdot 7 cdot 6$
- all possible selections of $color{red}{2}$ out of $color{red}{6}$ red balls: $color{red}{binom{6}{2}}$
- all possible selections of $color{green}{3}$ out of $color{green}{4}$ green balls: $color{green}{binom{4}{3}}$
- all possible arrangements of the selected $color{red}{2}+color{green}{3}$ balls: $5!$
All together
$$frac{color{red}{binom{6}{2}}cdot color{green}{binom{4}{3}} cdot 5!}{10cdot 9cdot 8cdot 7 cdot 6} = frac{color{red}{binom{6}{2}}cdot color{green}{binom{4}{3}}}{frac{10!}{5!cdot 5!}}= frac{5}{21}$$
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
If you took into consideration the order, you would get the same result but the calculation would be a bit more difficult:
- all possible sequences of $5$ balls respecting order (as if they were distinguishable): $10cdot 9cdot 8cdot 7 cdot 6$
- all possible selections of $color{red}{2}$ out of $color{red}{6}$ red balls: $color{red}{binom{6}{2}}$
- all possible selections of $color{green}{3}$ out of $color{green}{4}$ green balls: $color{green}{binom{4}{3}}$
- all possible arrangements of the selected $color{red}{2}+color{green}{3}$ balls: $5!$
All together
$$frac{color{red}{binom{6}{2}}cdot color{green}{binom{4}{3}} cdot 5!}{10cdot 9cdot 8cdot 7 cdot 6} = frac{color{red}{binom{6}{2}}cdot color{green}{binom{4}{3}}}{frac{10!}{5!cdot 5!}}= frac{5}{21}$$
$endgroup$
If you took into consideration the order, you would get the same result but the calculation would be a bit more difficult:
- all possible sequences of $5$ balls respecting order (as if they were distinguishable): $10cdot 9cdot 8cdot 7 cdot 6$
- all possible selections of $color{red}{2}$ out of $color{red}{6}$ red balls: $color{red}{binom{6}{2}}$
- all possible selections of $color{green}{3}$ out of $color{green}{4}$ green balls: $color{green}{binom{4}{3}}$
- all possible arrangements of the selected $color{red}{2}+color{green}{3}$ balls: $5!$
All together
$$frac{color{red}{binom{6}{2}}cdot color{green}{binom{4}{3}} cdot 5!}{10cdot 9cdot 8cdot 7 cdot 6} = frac{color{red}{binom{6}{2}}cdot color{green}{binom{4}{3}}}{frac{10!}{5!cdot 5!}}= frac{5}{21}$$
answered Apr 18 at 12:22
trancelocationtrancelocation
14.7k1929
14.7k1929
add a comment |
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The probability of picking a red ball first and then a green ball is
$$ frac{6}{10} cdot frac{4}{9} $$
The probability of picking a green ball first and then a red ball is
$$ frac{4}{10} cdot frac{6}{9} $$
Notice that the numbers in the denominator are the same, while the numbers in
the numerator are the same but in reverse order? Multiplication is commutative.
Another way of looking at this: we don't care about the process you go through in picking the balls, as long as it is fair: each possible outcome (i.e. each possible subset of
$5$ of the $10$ balls, where we consider the balls as in principle distinguishable) has the same probability. If this is the case, you just need to count the number of
outcomes that belong to the event you're considering, and divide by the total number of
outcomes.
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
Thank you for the explanation, as I started writing it down I came to the same conclusion but it's very helpful to see the problem from a different perspective!
$endgroup$
– Vasya
Apr 18 at 12:25
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The probability of picking a red ball first and then a green ball is
$$ frac{6}{10} cdot frac{4}{9} $$
The probability of picking a green ball first and then a red ball is
$$ frac{4}{10} cdot frac{6}{9} $$
Notice that the numbers in the denominator are the same, while the numbers in
the numerator are the same but in reverse order? Multiplication is commutative.
Another way of looking at this: we don't care about the process you go through in picking the balls, as long as it is fair: each possible outcome (i.e. each possible subset of
$5$ of the $10$ balls, where we consider the balls as in principle distinguishable) has the same probability. If this is the case, you just need to count the number of
outcomes that belong to the event you're considering, and divide by the total number of
outcomes.
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
Thank you for the explanation, as I started writing it down I came to the same conclusion but it's very helpful to see the problem from a different perspective!
$endgroup$
– Vasya
Apr 18 at 12:25
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The probability of picking a red ball first and then a green ball is
$$ frac{6}{10} cdot frac{4}{9} $$
The probability of picking a green ball first and then a red ball is
$$ frac{4}{10} cdot frac{6}{9} $$
Notice that the numbers in the denominator are the same, while the numbers in
the numerator are the same but in reverse order? Multiplication is commutative.
Another way of looking at this: we don't care about the process you go through in picking the balls, as long as it is fair: each possible outcome (i.e. each possible subset of
$5$ of the $10$ balls, where we consider the balls as in principle distinguishable) has the same probability. If this is the case, you just need to count the number of
outcomes that belong to the event you're considering, and divide by the total number of
outcomes.
$endgroup$
The probability of picking a red ball first and then a green ball is
$$ frac{6}{10} cdot frac{4}{9} $$
The probability of picking a green ball first and then a red ball is
$$ frac{4}{10} cdot frac{6}{9} $$
Notice that the numbers in the denominator are the same, while the numbers in
the numerator are the same but in reverse order? Multiplication is commutative.
Another way of looking at this: we don't care about the process you go through in picking the balls, as long as it is fair: each possible outcome (i.e. each possible subset of
$5$ of the $10$ balls, where we consider the balls as in principle distinguishable) has the same probability. If this is the case, you just need to count the number of
outcomes that belong to the event you're considering, and divide by the total number of
outcomes.
answered Apr 18 at 12:20
Robert IsraelRobert Israel
333k23223484
333k23223484
1
$begingroup$
Thank you for the explanation, as I started writing it down I came to the same conclusion but it's very helpful to see the problem from a different perspective!
$endgroup$
– Vasya
Apr 18 at 12:25
add a comment |
1
$begingroup$
Thank you for the explanation, as I started writing it down I came to the same conclusion but it's very helpful to see the problem from a different perspective!
$endgroup$
– Vasya
Apr 18 at 12:25
1
1
$begingroup$
Thank you for the explanation, as I started writing it down I came to the same conclusion but it's very helpful to see the problem from a different perspective!
$endgroup$
– Vasya
Apr 18 at 12:25
$begingroup$
Thank you for the explanation, as I started writing it down I came to the same conclusion but it's very helpful to see the problem from a different perspective!
$endgroup$
– Vasya
Apr 18 at 12:25
add a comment |
$begingroup$
You can comprehend the calculation in a simpler way with smaller numbers.
Daniel randomly chooses balls from the group of $3$ red and $2$ green. What
is the probability that he picks $2$ red and $2$ green if balls are drawn
without replacement.
Indeed we have to regard the order. There are $frac{4!}{2!cdot 2!}=6$ ways to draw 2 red and 2 green balls:
$$color{green}gcolor{green}gcolor{red}rcolor{red}r, color{green}gcolor{red}rcolor{green}gcolor{red}r, color{green}gcolor{red}rcolor{red}rcolor{green}g, color{red}rcolor{green}gcolor{green}gcolor{red}r, color{red}rcolor{green}gcolor{red}rcolor{green}g, color{red}rcolor{red}rcolor{green}gcolor{green}g$$
Each way has the same probability: $frac{3}{5}cdot frac{2}{4}cdot frac{2}{3}cdot frac{1}{2} quad (ggrr)$
Multiplying with 6 (ways) we get $6cdot frac{3}{5}cdot frac{2}{4}cdot frac{2}{3}cdot frac{1}{2}=frac{3}5=0.6 $
Using binomial coefficients we get $frac{binom{3}{2}cdot binom{2}{2}}{binom{5}{4}}=frac{3cdot 1}{5}=frac35=0.6$
And we get the same result.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
You can comprehend the calculation in a simpler way with smaller numbers.
Daniel randomly chooses balls from the group of $3$ red and $2$ green. What
is the probability that he picks $2$ red and $2$ green if balls are drawn
without replacement.
Indeed we have to regard the order. There are $frac{4!}{2!cdot 2!}=6$ ways to draw 2 red and 2 green balls:
$$color{green}gcolor{green}gcolor{red}rcolor{red}r, color{green}gcolor{red}rcolor{green}gcolor{red}r, color{green}gcolor{red}rcolor{red}rcolor{green}g, color{red}rcolor{green}gcolor{green}gcolor{red}r, color{red}rcolor{green}gcolor{red}rcolor{green}g, color{red}rcolor{red}rcolor{green}gcolor{green}g$$
Each way has the same probability: $frac{3}{5}cdot frac{2}{4}cdot frac{2}{3}cdot frac{1}{2} quad (ggrr)$
Multiplying with 6 (ways) we get $6cdot frac{3}{5}cdot frac{2}{4}cdot frac{2}{3}cdot frac{1}{2}=frac{3}5=0.6 $
Using binomial coefficients we get $frac{binom{3}{2}cdot binom{2}{2}}{binom{5}{4}}=frac{3cdot 1}{5}=frac35=0.6$
And we get the same result.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
You can comprehend the calculation in a simpler way with smaller numbers.
Daniel randomly chooses balls from the group of $3$ red and $2$ green. What
is the probability that he picks $2$ red and $2$ green if balls are drawn
without replacement.
Indeed we have to regard the order. There are $frac{4!}{2!cdot 2!}=6$ ways to draw 2 red and 2 green balls:
$$color{green}gcolor{green}gcolor{red}rcolor{red}r, color{green}gcolor{red}rcolor{green}gcolor{red}r, color{green}gcolor{red}rcolor{red}rcolor{green}g, color{red}rcolor{green}gcolor{green}gcolor{red}r, color{red}rcolor{green}gcolor{red}rcolor{green}g, color{red}rcolor{red}rcolor{green}gcolor{green}g$$
Each way has the same probability: $frac{3}{5}cdot frac{2}{4}cdot frac{2}{3}cdot frac{1}{2} quad (ggrr)$
Multiplying with 6 (ways) we get $6cdot frac{3}{5}cdot frac{2}{4}cdot frac{2}{3}cdot frac{1}{2}=frac{3}5=0.6 $
Using binomial coefficients we get $frac{binom{3}{2}cdot binom{2}{2}}{binom{5}{4}}=frac{3cdot 1}{5}=frac35=0.6$
And we get the same result.
$endgroup$
You can comprehend the calculation in a simpler way with smaller numbers.
Daniel randomly chooses balls from the group of $3$ red and $2$ green. What
is the probability that he picks $2$ red and $2$ green if balls are drawn
without replacement.
Indeed we have to regard the order. There are $frac{4!}{2!cdot 2!}=6$ ways to draw 2 red and 2 green balls:
$$color{green}gcolor{green}gcolor{red}rcolor{red}r, color{green}gcolor{red}rcolor{green}gcolor{red}r, color{green}gcolor{red}rcolor{red}rcolor{green}g, color{red}rcolor{green}gcolor{green}gcolor{red}r, color{red}rcolor{green}gcolor{red}rcolor{green}g, color{red}rcolor{red}rcolor{green}gcolor{green}g$$
Each way has the same probability: $frac{3}{5}cdot frac{2}{4}cdot frac{2}{3}cdot frac{1}{2} quad (ggrr)$
Multiplying with 6 (ways) we get $6cdot frac{3}{5}cdot frac{2}{4}cdot frac{2}{3}cdot frac{1}{2}=frac{3}5=0.6 $
Using binomial coefficients we get $frac{binom{3}{2}cdot binom{2}{2}}{binom{5}{4}}=frac{3cdot 1}{5}=frac35=0.6$
And we get the same result.
edited Apr 18 at 12:35
answered Apr 18 at 12:30
callculuscallculus
19k31731
19k31731
add a comment |
add a comment |
$begingroup$
There is a principle called "conservation of expected evidence" that says that if you have events A and B, then when you calculate the probability of A without knowing whether B happens, the result should be the same as the expected value of the probability over the possible results of B.
In this case, let A be the probability that the second ball is red, and B be the probability the first one is green. The principle says that P(A) = P(A|B)P(B)+P(A|~B)P(~B). That is, if you split A into two cases of A and B versus A and not B, the total probability should just be the probability of A. If you roll a die and flip a coin, the probability of getting a 1 one the die should change if you split it into P(die=1,coin=heads) plus P(die=1,coin=tails).
We have the following values for those probabilities:
P(A) = $frac6{10}$
P(A|B) = $frac5 9 $
P(B) = $frac6{10}$
P(A|~B) = $frac 6 9 $
P(~B) = $frac 4 {10}$
So the equation is $frac6{10} = frac5 9 frac6{10}+frac 6 9 frac 4 {10}=frac{30+24}{9*10} = frac{54}{9*10}=frac{9*6}{9*10}=frac 6 {10}$
If you have ten cards, 6 red and 4 green, and you shuffle them, would the probability of the first one being red be any different from the probability of the second one being red?
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
There is a principle called "conservation of expected evidence" that says that if you have events A and B, then when you calculate the probability of A without knowing whether B happens, the result should be the same as the expected value of the probability over the possible results of B.
In this case, let A be the probability that the second ball is red, and B be the probability the first one is green. The principle says that P(A) = P(A|B)P(B)+P(A|~B)P(~B). That is, if you split A into two cases of A and B versus A and not B, the total probability should just be the probability of A. If you roll a die and flip a coin, the probability of getting a 1 one the die should change if you split it into P(die=1,coin=heads) plus P(die=1,coin=tails).
We have the following values for those probabilities:
P(A) = $frac6{10}$
P(A|B) = $frac5 9 $
P(B) = $frac6{10}$
P(A|~B) = $frac 6 9 $
P(~B) = $frac 4 {10}$
So the equation is $frac6{10} = frac5 9 frac6{10}+frac 6 9 frac 4 {10}=frac{30+24}{9*10} = frac{54}{9*10}=frac{9*6}{9*10}=frac 6 {10}$
If you have ten cards, 6 red and 4 green, and you shuffle them, would the probability of the first one being red be any different from the probability of the second one being red?
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
There is a principle called "conservation of expected evidence" that says that if you have events A and B, then when you calculate the probability of A without knowing whether B happens, the result should be the same as the expected value of the probability over the possible results of B.
In this case, let A be the probability that the second ball is red, and B be the probability the first one is green. The principle says that P(A) = P(A|B)P(B)+P(A|~B)P(~B). That is, if you split A into two cases of A and B versus A and not B, the total probability should just be the probability of A. If you roll a die and flip a coin, the probability of getting a 1 one the die should change if you split it into P(die=1,coin=heads) plus P(die=1,coin=tails).
We have the following values for those probabilities:
P(A) = $frac6{10}$
P(A|B) = $frac5 9 $
P(B) = $frac6{10}$
P(A|~B) = $frac 6 9 $
P(~B) = $frac 4 {10}$
So the equation is $frac6{10} = frac5 9 frac6{10}+frac 6 9 frac 4 {10}=frac{30+24}{9*10} = frac{54}{9*10}=frac{9*6}{9*10}=frac 6 {10}$
If you have ten cards, 6 red and 4 green, and you shuffle them, would the probability of the first one being red be any different from the probability of the second one being red?
$endgroup$
There is a principle called "conservation of expected evidence" that says that if you have events A and B, then when you calculate the probability of A without knowing whether B happens, the result should be the same as the expected value of the probability over the possible results of B.
In this case, let A be the probability that the second ball is red, and B be the probability the first one is green. The principle says that P(A) = P(A|B)P(B)+P(A|~B)P(~B). That is, if you split A into two cases of A and B versus A and not B, the total probability should just be the probability of A. If you roll a die and flip a coin, the probability of getting a 1 one the die should change if you split it into P(die=1,coin=heads) plus P(die=1,coin=tails).
We have the following values for those probabilities:
P(A) = $frac6{10}$
P(A|B) = $frac5 9 $
P(B) = $frac6{10}$
P(A|~B) = $frac 6 9 $
P(~B) = $frac 4 {10}$
So the equation is $frac6{10} = frac5 9 frac6{10}+frac 6 9 frac 4 {10}=frac{30+24}{9*10} = frac{54}{9*10}=frac{9*6}{9*10}=frac 6 {10}$
If you have ten cards, 6 red and 4 green, and you shuffle them, would the probability of the first one being red be any different from the probability of the second one being red?
answered Apr 18 at 15:17
AcccumulationAcccumulation
7,4612619
7,4612619
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3192310%2fdrawing-without-replacement-why-is-the-order-of-draw-irrelevant%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
1
$begingroup$
Usually the "nominator" is called numerator.
$endgroup$
– callculus
Apr 18 at 12:12
$begingroup$
@callculus: yes, of, course, I need coffee :)
$endgroup$
– Vasya
Apr 18 at 12:20
2
$begingroup$
The order doesn't matter because $P(A)$ is ultimately the sum of various conditional probabilities, and addition is both commutative and associative.
$endgroup$
– chepner
Apr 18 at 14:04