Incomplete cube












13















I want to draw an incomplete cube, as in the following figure.



enter image description here



But, I can only draw a complete cube, see below.



enter image description here



documentclass[12pt]{article}
usepackage{tikz}
usepackage{verbatim}
usetikzlibrary{positioning}
begin{document}
begin{tikzpicture}[on grid][scale=1.4]
shade[yslant=-0.5,right color=white, left color=white]
(0,0) rectangle +(3,3);
draw[yslant=-0.5] (0,0) grid (3,3);
shade[yslant=0.5,right color=white,left color=white]
(3,-3) rectangle +(3,3);
draw[yslant=0.5] (3,-3) grid (6,0);
shade[yslant=0.5,xslant=-1,bottom color=white,
top color=white] (6,3) rectangle +(-3,-3);
draw[yslant=0.5,xslant=-1] (3,0) grid (6,3);
end{tikzpicture}
end{document}









share|improve this question





























    13















    I want to draw an incomplete cube, as in the following figure.



    enter image description here



    But, I can only draw a complete cube, see below.



    enter image description here



    documentclass[12pt]{article}
    usepackage{tikz}
    usepackage{verbatim}
    usetikzlibrary{positioning}
    begin{document}
    begin{tikzpicture}[on grid][scale=1.4]
    shade[yslant=-0.5,right color=white, left color=white]
    (0,0) rectangle +(3,3);
    draw[yslant=-0.5] (0,0) grid (3,3);
    shade[yslant=0.5,right color=white,left color=white]
    (3,-3) rectangle +(3,3);
    draw[yslant=0.5] (3,-3) grid (6,0);
    shade[yslant=0.5,xslant=-1,bottom color=white,
    top color=white] (6,3) rectangle +(-3,-3);
    draw[yslant=0.5,xslant=-1] (3,0) grid (6,3);
    end{tikzpicture}
    end{document}









    share|improve this question



























      13












      13








      13


      1






      I want to draw an incomplete cube, as in the following figure.



      enter image description here



      But, I can only draw a complete cube, see below.



      enter image description here



      documentclass[12pt]{article}
      usepackage{tikz}
      usepackage{verbatim}
      usetikzlibrary{positioning}
      begin{document}
      begin{tikzpicture}[on grid][scale=1.4]
      shade[yslant=-0.5,right color=white, left color=white]
      (0,0) rectangle +(3,3);
      draw[yslant=-0.5] (0,0) grid (3,3);
      shade[yslant=0.5,right color=white,left color=white]
      (3,-3) rectangle +(3,3);
      draw[yslant=0.5] (3,-3) grid (6,0);
      shade[yslant=0.5,xslant=-1,bottom color=white,
      top color=white] (6,3) rectangle +(-3,-3);
      draw[yslant=0.5,xslant=-1] (3,0) grid (6,3);
      end{tikzpicture}
      end{document}









      share|improve this question
















      I want to draw an incomplete cube, as in the following figure.



      enter image description here



      But, I can only draw a complete cube, see below.



      enter image description here



      documentclass[12pt]{article}
      usepackage{tikz}
      usepackage{verbatim}
      usetikzlibrary{positioning}
      begin{document}
      begin{tikzpicture}[on grid][scale=1.4]
      shade[yslant=-0.5,right color=white, left color=white]
      (0,0) rectangle +(3,3);
      draw[yslant=-0.5] (0,0) grid (3,3);
      shade[yslant=0.5,right color=white,left color=white]
      (3,-3) rectangle +(3,3);
      draw[yslant=0.5] (3,-3) grid (6,0);
      shade[yslant=0.5,xslant=-1,bottom color=white,
      top color=white] (6,3) rectangle +(-3,-3);
      draw[yslant=0.5,xslant=-1] (3,0) grid (6,3);
      end{tikzpicture}
      end{document}






      tikz-pgf






      share|improve this question















      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question








      edited Apr 1 at 11:25









      sheß

      2,06511436




      2,06511436










      asked Apr 1 at 10:51









      Benedito FreireBenedito Freire

      1307




      1307






















          3 Answers
          3






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          14














          Just for fun: everything is in 2D



          documentclass[tikz]{standalone}
          begin{document}
          begin{tikzpicture}
          draw (0,0) rectangle (1,1) (1,1) rectangle (2,2) (0,1) rectangle (1,2) (0,2) rectangle (1,3) (1,0) rectangle (2,1) (2,0) rectangle (3,1);
          draw (3.6,1.6)--(3.6,.6)--(3,0)--(3,1)--cycle--(3.6,2.6)--(2.6,2.6)--(2.6,3.6)--(.6,3.6)--(0,3);
          draw (2,1)--(2.4,1.4) (2,2)--(2.6,2.6) (1,2)--(1.4,2.4) (1,3)--(1.6,3.6) (2.4,3.4)--(2.6,3.6) (3.4,2.4)--(3.6,2.6);
          draw (2.4,1.4) rectangle (3.4,2.4) (1.4,2.4) rectangle (2.4,3.4);
          draw (.4,3.4)--(1.4,3.4) (3.4,1.4)--(3.4,.4) (.2,3.2)--(1.2,3.2)--(1.2,2.2)--(2.2,2.2)--(2.2,1.2)--(3.2,1.2)--(3.2,.2);
          end{tikzpicture}
          end{document}


          enter image description here



          With colors



          documentclass[tikz]{standalone}
          begin{document}
          begin{tikzpicture}
          fill[black!70] (3,0)--(3.6,.6)--(3.6,2.6)--(3.4,2.4)--(3.4,1.4)--(3,1)--cycle (2.4,2.4)--(2.6,2.6)--(2.6,3.6)--(2.4,3.4)--(2.4,1.4)--(2,1)--(2,2)--cycle (1,2)--(1.4,2.4)--(1.4,3.4)--(1,3)--cycle;
          fill[black!30] (0,3)--(.6,3.6)-_(2.6,3.6)--(2.4,3.4)--(1.4,3.4)--(1,3)--cycle (2.4,2.4)--(2.6,2.6)--(3.6,2.6)--(3.4,2.4)--(1.4,2.4)--(1,2)--(2,2)--cycle (2,1)--(2.4,1.4)--(3.4,1.4)--(3,1)--cycle;
          draw (0,0) rectangle (1,1) (1,1) rectangle (2,2) (0,1) rectangle (1,2) (0,2) rectangle (1,3) (1,0) rectangle (2,1) (2,0) rectangle (3,1);
          draw (3.6,1.6)--(3.6,.6)--(3,0)--(3,1)--cycle--(3.6,2.6)--(2.6,2.6)--(2.6,3.6)--(.6,3.6)--(0,3);
          draw (2,1)--(2.4,1.4) (2,2)--(2.6,2.6) (1,2)--(1.4,2.4) (1,3)--(1.6,3.6) (2.4,3.4)--(2.6,3.6) (3.4,2.4)--(3.6,2.6);
          draw (2.4,1.4) rectangle (3.4,2.4) (1.4,2.4) rectangle (2.4,3.4);
          draw (.4,3.4)--(1.4,3.4) (3.4,1.4)--(3.4,.4) (.2,3.2)--(1.2,3.2)--(1.2,2.2)--(2.2,2.2)--(2.2,1.2)--(3.2,1.2)--(3.2,.2);
          end{tikzpicture}
          end{document}


          enter image description here






          share|improve this answer































            17














            You can define a single cube as pic and place it where you want (starting from bottom back to top front).



            documentclass[tikz,border=7pt]{standalone}
            tikzset{
            cube/.pic={
            draw[fill=black!20] (0,1,0) -- (0,1,1) -- (1,1,1) -- (1,1,0);
            draw[fill=black!50] (1,0,0) -- (1,0,1) -- (1,1,1) -- (1,1,0);
            draw[fill=white] (0,0,0) rectangle (1,1,0);
            }
            }
            begin{document}
            tikz[z={(.4,.3)}]pathpgfextra{def~{pic{cube}}} % <--- to make the code shorter
            (2,0,2)~(2,0,1)~(0,0,0)~(1,0,0)~(2,0,0)~
            (2,1,2)~(1,1,1)~(0,1,0)~(1,1,0)~
            (0,2,2)~(1,2,2)~(0,2,1)~(0,2,0)~;
            end{document}


            enter image description here






            share|improve this answer





















            • 1





              ...better to use the redefined ~ version inside a group, even if it's just to shorten your code. As in, begingroup def~{pic{code}} begin{tikzpicture} ... end{tikzpicture}.

              – Werner
              Apr 1 at 19:22











            • @Werner Agree, thanks. Done.

              – Kpym
              Apr 1 at 19:30











            • The pgfextra and {...} only to avoid { and }? ` tikz[z={(.4,.3)}]{def~{pic{cube}} path (2,0,2)~(2,0,1)~(0,0,0)~(1,0,0)~(2,0,0)~ (2,1,2)~(1,1,1)~(0,1,0)~(1,1,0)~ (0,2,2)~(1,2,2)~(0,2,1)~(0,2,0)~;}`

              – marmot
              Apr 1 at 20:23











            • @marmot I never avoid shorter code in general ;) But here, as redefining ~ is not a good practice, I decided to follow the comment of @Werner and to make its definition as local as possible : so local to the path is better to local for the entire tikz.

              – Kpym
              Apr 1 at 20:49











            • If that's your aim:documentclass[tikz,border=7pt]{standalone} tikzset{ cube/.pic={ draw[fill=black!20] (0,1,0) -- (0,1,1) -- (1,1,1) -- (1,1,0); draw[fill=black!50] (1,0,0) -- (1,0,1) -- (1,1,1) -- (1,1,0); draw[fill=white] (0,0,0) rectangle (1,1,0); },icube/.style={insert path={#1 pic{cube}}} } begin{document} tikz[z={(.4,.3)}]path[icube/.list={(2,0,2),(2,0,1),(0,0,0),(1,0,0),(2,0,0), (2,1,2),(1,1,1),(0,1,0),(1,1,0), (0,2,2),(1,2,2),(0,2,1),(0,2,0)}]; end{document}

              – marmot
              Apr 1 at 20:59



















            10














            I would like to argue that one should use orthographic projections and write it in such a way that one can change the view angle. There are already many posts on this, perhaps most impressingly this one. The idea to use pics for the unit cubes to draw 3d cubes with some little cubes missing is also not new, it has been used here, where the cubes are rotatable in 3d. I just recycled the code to get



            documentclass[tikz,border=3.14mm]{standalone}
            usepackage{tikz-3dplot}
            usetikzlibrary{calc}
            tikzset{plane/.style n args={3}{insert path={%
            #1 -- ++ #2 -- ++ #3 -- ++ ($-1*#2$) -- cycle}},
            unit xy plane/.style={plane={#1}{(1,0,0)}{(0,1,0)}},
            unit xz plane/.style={plane={#1}{(1,0,0)}{(0,0,1)}},
            unit yz plane/.style={plane={#1}{(0,1,0)}{(0,0,1)}},
            get projections/.style={insert path={%
            let p1=(1,0,0),p2=(0,1,0) in
            [/utils/exec={pgfmathtruncatemacro{xproj}{sign(x1)}xdefxproj{xproj}
            pgfmathtruncatemacro{yproj}{sign(x2)}xdefyproj{yproj}
            pgfmathtruncatemacro{zproj}{sign(cos(tdplotmaintheta))}xdefzproj{zproj}}]}},
            pics/unit cube/.style={code={
            path[get projections];
            draw (0,0,0) -- (1,1,1);
            ifnumzproj=-1
            path[3d cube/every face,3d cube/xy face,unit xy plane={(0,0,0)}];
            fi
            ifnumyproj=1
            path[3d cube/every face,3d cube/yz face,unit yz plane={(1,0,0)}];
            else
            path[3d cube/every face,3d cube/yz face,unit yz plane={(0,0,0)}];
            fi
            ifnumxproj=1
            path[3d cube/every face,3d cube/xz face,unit xz plane={(0,0,0)}];
            else
            path[3d cube/every face,3d cube/xz face,unit xz plane={(0,1,0)}];
            fi
            ifnumzproj>-1
            path[3d cube/every face,3d cube/xy face,unit xy plane={(0,0,1)}];
            fi
            }},
            3d cube/.cd,
            xy face/.style={fill=gray!20},
            xz face/.style={fill=gray!50},
            yz face/.style={fill=gray!90},
            every face/.style={draw,very thick}
            }
            begin{document}
            foreach Angle in {5,15,...,355}
            {tdplotsetmaincoords{60}{Angle} % the first argument cannot be larger than 90
            begin{tikzpicture}[line join=round]
            pgfmathtruncatemacro{NumCubes}{7}
            path[use as bounding box] (-NumCubes/2-3,-NumCubes/2-2)
            rectangle (NumCubes/2+3,NumCubes/2+4);
            begin{scope}[tdplot_main_coords]
            pgfmathtruncatemacro{NextToLast}{NumCubes-1}
            path[get projections];
            ifnumyproj=1
            defLstX{1,2,3}
            else
            defLstX{3,2,1}
            fi
            ifnumxproj=-1
            defLstY{1,2,3}
            else
            defLstY{3,2,1}
            fi
            foreach X in LstX
            {foreach Y in LstY
            {ifnumY=3
            pgfmathtruncatemacro{Zmax}{5-max(X,2)}
            else
            pgfmathtruncatemacro{Zmax}{4-X}
            fi
            foreach Z in {1,...,Zmax}
            {path (X-2,Y-2,Z-1) pic{unit cube};}}
            }
            end{scope}
            end{tikzpicture}}
            end{document}


            enter image description here






            share|improve this answer
























            • "I would like to argue that one should use orthographic projections". Spoken like a true engineer! +1

              – Steven B. Segletes
              Apr 1 at 14:13












            Your Answer








            StackExchange.ready(function() {
            var channelOptions = {
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "85"
            };
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
            createEditor();
            });
            }
            else {
            createEditor();
            }
            });

            function createEditor() {
            StackExchange.prepareEditor({
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
            convertImagesToLinks: false,
            noModals: true,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: null,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            imageUploader: {
            brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
            contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
            allowUrls: true
            },
            onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            });


            }
            });














            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f482561%2fincomplete-cube%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown

























            3 Answers
            3






            active

            oldest

            votes








            3 Answers
            3






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes









            14














            Just for fun: everything is in 2D



            documentclass[tikz]{standalone}
            begin{document}
            begin{tikzpicture}
            draw (0,0) rectangle (1,1) (1,1) rectangle (2,2) (0,1) rectangle (1,2) (0,2) rectangle (1,3) (1,0) rectangle (2,1) (2,0) rectangle (3,1);
            draw (3.6,1.6)--(3.6,.6)--(3,0)--(3,1)--cycle--(3.6,2.6)--(2.6,2.6)--(2.6,3.6)--(.6,3.6)--(0,3);
            draw (2,1)--(2.4,1.4) (2,2)--(2.6,2.6) (1,2)--(1.4,2.4) (1,3)--(1.6,3.6) (2.4,3.4)--(2.6,3.6) (3.4,2.4)--(3.6,2.6);
            draw (2.4,1.4) rectangle (3.4,2.4) (1.4,2.4) rectangle (2.4,3.4);
            draw (.4,3.4)--(1.4,3.4) (3.4,1.4)--(3.4,.4) (.2,3.2)--(1.2,3.2)--(1.2,2.2)--(2.2,2.2)--(2.2,1.2)--(3.2,1.2)--(3.2,.2);
            end{tikzpicture}
            end{document}


            enter image description here



            With colors



            documentclass[tikz]{standalone}
            begin{document}
            begin{tikzpicture}
            fill[black!70] (3,0)--(3.6,.6)--(3.6,2.6)--(3.4,2.4)--(3.4,1.4)--(3,1)--cycle (2.4,2.4)--(2.6,2.6)--(2.6,3.6)--(2.4,3.4)--(2.4,1.4)--(2,1)--(2,2)--cycle (1,2)--(1.4,2.4)--(1.4,3.4)--(1,3)--cycle;
            fill[black!30] (0,3)--(.6,3.6)-_(2.6,3.6)--(2.4,3.4)--(1.4,3.4)--(1,3)--cycle (2.4,2.4)--(2.6,2.6)--(3.6,2.6)--(3.4,2.4)--(1.4,2.4)--(1,2)--(2,2)--cycle (2,1)--(2.4,1.4)--(3.4,1.4)--(3,1)--cycle;
            draw (0,0) rectangle (1,1) (1,1) rectangle (2,2) (0,1) rectangle (1,2) (0,2) rectangle (1,3) (1,0) rectangle (2,1) (2,0) rectangle (3,1);
            draw (3.6,1.6)--(3.6,.6)--(3,0)--(3,1)--cycle--(3.6,2.6)--(2.6,2.6)--(2.6,3.6)--(.6,3.6)--(0,3);
            draw (2,1)--(2.4,1.4) (2,2)--(2.6,2.6) (1,2)--(1.4,2.4) (1,3)--(1.6,3.6) (2.4,3.4)--(2.6,3.6) (3.4,2.4)--(3.6,2.6);
            draw (2.4,1.4) rectangle (3.4,2.4) (1.4,2.4) rectangle (2.4,3.4);
            draw (.4,3.4)--(1.4,3.4) (3.4,1.4)--(3.4,.4) (.2,3.2)--(1.2,3.2)--(1.2,2.2)--(2.2,2.2)--(2.2,1.2)--(3.2,1.2)--(3.2,.2);
            end{tikzpicture}
            end{document}


            enter image description here






            share|improve this answer




























              14














              Just for fun: everything is in 2D



              documentclass[tikz]{standalone}
              begin{document}
              begin{tikzpicture}
              draw (0,0) rectangle (1,1) (1,1) rectangle (2,2) (0,1) rectangle (1,2) (0,2) rectangle (1,3) (1,0) rectangle (2,1) (2,0) rectangle (3,1);
              draw (3.6,1.6)--(3.6,.6)--(3,0)--(3,1)--cycle--(3.6,2.6)--(2.6,2.6)--(2.6,3.6)--(.6,3.6)--(0,3);
              draw (2,1)--(2.4,1.4) (2,2)--(2.6,2.6) (1,2)--(1.4,2.4) (1,3)--(1.6,3.6) (2.4,3.4)--(2.6,3.6) (3.4,2.4)--(3.6,2.6);
              draw (2.4,1.4) rectangle (3.4,2.4) (1.4,2.4) rectangle (2.4,3.4);
              draw (.4,3.4)--(1.4,3.4) (3.4,1.4)--(3.4,.4) (.2,3.2)--(1.2,3.2)--(1.2,2.2)--(2.2,2.2)--(2.2,1.2)--(3.2,1.2)--(3.2,.2);
              end{tikzpicture}
              end{document}


              enter image description here



              With colors



              documentclass[tikz]{standalone}
              begin{document}
              begin{tikzpicture}
              fill[black!70] (3,0)--(3.6,.6)--(3.6,2.6)--(3.4,2.4)--(3.4,1.4)--(3,1)--cycle (2.4,2.4)--(2.6,2.6)--(2.6,3.6)--(2.4,3.4)--(2.4,1.4)--(2,1)--(2,2)--cycle (1,2)--(1.4,2.4)--(1.4,3.4)--(1,3)--cycle;
              fill[black!30] (0,3)--(.6,3.6)-_(2.6,3.6)--(2.4,3.4)--(1.4,3.4)--(1,3)--cycle (2.4,2.4)--(2.6,2.6)--(3.6,2.6)--(3.4,2.4)--(1.4,2.4)--(1,2)--(2,2)--cycle (2,1)--(2.4,1.4)--(3.4,1.4)--(3,1)--cycle;
              draw (0,0) rectangle (1,1) (1,1) rectangle (2,2) (0,1) rectangle (1,2) (0,2) rectangle (1,3) (1,0) rectangle (2,1) (2,0) rectangle (3,1);
              draw (3.6,1.6)--(3.6,.6)--(3,0)--(3,1)--cycle--(3.6,2.6)--(2.6,2.6)--(2.6,3.6)--(.6,3.6)--(0,3);
              draw (2,1)--(2.4,1.4) (2,2)--(2.6,2.6) (1,2)--(1.4,2.4) (1,3)--(1.6,3.6) (2.4,3.4)--(2.6,3.6) (3.4,2.4)--(3.6,2.6);
              draw (2.4,1.4) rectangle (3.4,2.4) (1.4,2.4) rectangle (2.4,3.4);
              draw (.4,3.4)--(1.4,3.4) (3.4,1.4)--(3.4,.4) (.2,3.2)--(1.2,3.2)--(1.2,2.2)--(2.2,2.2)--(2.2,1.2)--(3.2,1.2)--(3.2,.2);
              end{tikzpicture}
              end{document}


              enter image description here






              share|improve this answer


























                14












                14








                14







                Just for fun: everything is in 2D



                documentclass[tikz]{standalone}
                begin{document}
                begin{tikzpicture}
                draw (0,0) rectangle (1,1) (1,1) rectangle (2,2) (0,1) rectangle (1,2) (0,2) rectangle (1,3) (1,0) rectangle (2,1) (2,0) rectangle (3,1);
                draw (3.6,1.6)--(3.6,.6)--(3,0)--(3,1)--cycle--(3.6,2.6)--(2.6,2.6)--(2.6,3.6)--(.6,3.6)--(0,3);
                draw (2,1)--(2.4,1.4) (2,2)--(2.6,2.6) (1,2)--(1.4,2.4) (1,3)--(1.6,3.6) (2.4,3.4)--(2.6,3.6) (3.4,2.4)--(3.6,2.6);
                draw (2.4,1.4) rectangle (3.4,2.4) (1.4,2.4) rectangle (2.4,3.4);
                draw (.4,3.4)--(1.4,3.4) (3.4,1.4)--(3.4,.4) (.2,3.2)--(1.2,3.2)--(1.2,2.2)--(2.2,2.2)--(2.2,1.2)--(3.2,1.2)--(3.2,.2);
                end{tikzpicture}
                end{document}


                enter image description here



                With colors



                documentclass[tikz]{standalone}
                begin{document}
                begin{tikzpicture}
                fill[black!70] (3,0)--(3.6,.6)--(3.6,2.6)--(3.4,2.4)--(3.4,1.4)--(3,1)--cycle (2.4,2.4)--(2.6,2.6)--(2.6,3.6)--(2.4,3.4)--(2.4,1.4)--(2,1)--(2,2)--cycle (1,2)--(1.4,2.4)--(1.4,3.4)--(1,3)--cycle;
                fill[black!30] (0,3)--(.6,3.6)-_(2.6,3.6)--(2.4,3.4)--(1.4,3.4)--(1,3)--cycle (2.4,2.4)--(2.6,2.6)--(3.6,2.6)--(3.4,2.4)--(1.4,2.4)--(1,2)--(2,2)--cycle (2,1)--(2.4,1.4)--(3.4,1.4)--(3,1)--cycle;
                draw (0,0) rectangle (1,1) (1,1) rectangle (2,2) (0,1) rectangle (1,2) (0,2) rectangle (1,3) (1,0) rectangle (2,1) (2,0) rectangle (3,1);
                draw (3.6,1.6)--(3.6,.6)--(3,0)--(3,1)--cycle--(3.6,2.6)--(2.6,2.6)--(2.6,3.6)--(.6,3.6)--(0,3);
                draw (2,1)--(2.4,1.4) (2,2)--(2.6,2.6) (1,2)--(1.4,2.4) (1,3)--(1.6,3.6) (2.4,3.4)--(2.6,3.6) (3.4,2.4)--(3.6,2.6);
                draw (2.4,1.4) rectangle (3.4,2.4) (1.4,2.4) rectangle (2.4,3.4);
                draw (.4,3.4)--(1.4,3.4) (3.4,1.4)--(3.4,.4) (.2,3.2)--(1.2,3.2)--(1.2,2.2)--(2.2,2.2)--(2.2,1.2)--(3.2,1.2)--(3.2,.2);
                end{tikzpicture}
                end{document}


                enter image description here






                share|improve this answer













                Just for fun: everything is in 2D



                documentclass[tikz]{standalone}
                begin{document}
                begin{tikzpicture}
                draw (0,0) rectangle (1,1) (1,1) rectangle (2,2) (0,1) rectangle (1,2) (0,2) rectangle (1,3) (1,0) rectangle (2,1) (2,0) rectangle (3,1);
                draw (3.6,1.6)--(3.6,.6)--(3,0)--(3,1)--cycle--(3.6,2.6)--(2.6,2.6)--(2.6,3.6)--(.6,3.6)--(0,3);
                draw (2,1)--(2.4,1.4) (2,2)--(2.6,2.6) (1,2)--(1.4,2.4) (1,3)--(1.6,3.6) (2.4,3.4)--(2.6,3.6) (3.4,2.4)--(3.6,2.6);
                draw (2.4,1.4) rectangle (3.4,2.4) (1.4,2.4) rectangle (2.4,3.4);
                draw (.4,3.4)--(1.4,3.4) (3.4,1.4)--(3.4,.4) (.2,3.2)--(1.2,3.2)--(1.2,2.2)--(2.2,2.2)--(2.2,1.2)--(3.2,1.2)--(3.2,.2);
                end{tikzpicture}
                end{document}


                enter image description here



                With colors



                documentclass[tikz]{standalone}
                begin{document}
                begin{tikzpicture}
                fill[black!70] (3,0)--(3.6,.6)--(3.6,2.6)--(3.4,2.4)--(3.4,1.4)--(3,1)--cycle (2.4,2.4)--(2.6,2.6)--(2.6,3.6)--(2.4,3.4)--(2.4,1.4)--(2,1)--(2,2)--cycle (1,2)--(1.4,2.4)--(1.4,3.4)--(1,3)--cycle;
                fill[black!30] (0,3)--(.6,3.6)-_(2.6,3.6)--(2.4,3.4)--(1.4,3.4)--(1,3)--cycle (2.4,2.4)--(2.6,2.6)--(3.6,2.6)--(3.4,2.4)--(1.4,2.4)--(1,2)--(2,2)--cycle (2,1)--(2.4,1.4)--(3.4,1.4)--(3,1)--cycle;
                draw (0,0) rectangle (1,1) (1,1) rectangle (2,2) (0,1) rectangle (1,2) (0,2) rectangle (1,3) (1,0) rectangle (2,1) (2,0) rectangle (3,1);
                draw (3.6,1.6)--(3.6,.6)--(3,0)--(3,1)--cycle--(3.6,2.6)--(2.6,2.6)--(2.6,3.6)--(.6,3.6)--(0,3);
                draw (2,1)--(2.4,1.4) (2,2)--(2.6,2.6) (1,2)--(1.4,2.4) (1,3)--(1.6,3.6) (2.4,3.4)--(2.6,3.6) (3.4,2.4)--(3.6,2.6);
                draw (2.4,1.4) rectangle (3.4,2.4) (1.4,2.4) rectangle (2.4,3.4);
                draw (.4,3.4)--(1.4,3.4) (3.4,1.4)--(3.4,.4) (.2,3.2)--(1.2,3.2)--(1.2,2.2)--(2.2,2.2)--(2.2,1.2)--(3.2,1.2)--(3.2,.2);
                end{tikzpicture}
                end{document}


                enter image description here







                share|improve this answer












                share|improve this answer



                share|improve this answer










                answered Apr 1 at 11:07









                JouleVJouleV

                11.4k22561




                11.4k22561























                    17














                    You can define a single cube as pic and place it where you want (starting from bottom back to top front).



                    documentclass[tikz,border=7pt]{standalone}
                    tikzset{
                    cube/.pic={
                    draw[fill=black!20] (0,1,0) -- (0,1,1) -- (1,1,1) -- (1,1,0);
                    draw[fill=black!50] (1,0,0) -- (1,0,1) -- (1,1,1) -- (1,1,0);
                    draw[fill=white] (0,0,0) rectangle (1,1,0);
                    }
                    }
                    begin{document}
                    tikz[z={(.4,.3)}]pathpgfextra{def~{pic{cube}}} % <--- to make the code shorter
                    (2,0,2)~(2,0,1)~(0,0,0)~(1,0,0)~(2,0,0)~
                    (2,1,2)~(1,1,1)~(0,1,0)~(1,1,0)~
                    (0,2,2)~(1,2,2)~(0,2,1)~(0,2,0)~;
                    end{document}


                    enter image description here






                    share|improve this answer





















                    • 1





                      ...better to use the redefined ~ version inside a group, even if it's just to shorten your code. As in, begingroup def~{pic{code}} begin{tikzpicture} ... end{tikzpicture}.

                      – Werner
                      Apr 1 at 19:22











                    • @Werner Agree, thanks. Done.

                      – Kpym
                      Apr 1 at 19:30











                    • The pgfextra and {...} only to avoid { and }? ` tikz[z={(.4,.3)}]{def~{pic{cube}} path (2,0,2)~(2,0,1)~(0,0,0)~(1,0,0)~(2,0,0)~ (2,1,2)~(1,1,1)~(0,1,0)~(1,1,0)~ (0,2,2)~(1,2,2)~(0,2,1)~(0,2,0)~;}`

                      – marmot
                      Apr 1 at 20:23











                    • @marmot I never avoid shorter code in general ;) But here, as redefining ~ is not a good practice, I decided to follow the comment of @Werner and to make its definition as local as possible : so local to the path is better to local for the entire tikz.

                      – Kpym
                      Apr 1 at 20:49











                    • If that's your aim:documentclass[tikz,border=7pt]{standalone} tikzset{ cube/.pic={ draw[fill=black!20] (0,1,0) -- (0,1,1) -- (1,1,1) -- (1,1,0); draw[fill=black!50] (1,0,0) -- (1,0,1) -- (1,1,1) -- (1,1,0); draw[fill=white] (0,0,0) rectangle (1,1,0); },icube/.style={insert path={#1 pic{cube}}} } begin{document} tikz[z={(.4,.3)}]path[icube/.list={(2,0,2),(2,0,1),(0,0,0),(1,0,0),(2,0,0), (2,1,2),(1,1,1),(0,1,0),(1,1,0), (0,2,2),(1,2,2),(0,2,1),(0,2,0)}]; end{document}

                      – marmot
                      Apr 1 at 20:59
















                    17














                    You can define a single cube as pic and place it where you want (starting from bottom back to top front).



                    documentclass[tikz,border=7pt]{standalone}
                    tikzset{
                    cube/.pic={
                    draw[fill=black!20] (0,1,0) -- (0,1,1) -- (1,1,1) -- (1,1,0);
                    draw[fill=black!50] (1,0,0) -- (1,0,1) -- (1,1,1) -- (1,1,0);
                    draw[fill=white] (0,0,0) rectangle (1,1,0);
                    }
                    }
                    begin{document}
                    tikz[z={(.4,.3)}]pathpgfextra{def~{pic{cube}}} % <--- to make the code shorter
                    (2,0,2)~(2,0,1)~(0,0,0)~(1,0,0)~(2,0,0)~
                    (2,1,2)~(1,1,1)~(0,1,0)~(1,1,0)~
                    (0,2,2)~(1,2,2)~(0,2,1)~(0,2,0)~;
                    end{document}


                    enter image description here






                    share|improve this answer





















                    • 1





                      ...better to use the redefined ~ version inside a group, even if it's just to shorten your code. As in, begingroup def~{pic{code}} begin{tikzpicture} ... end{tikzpicture}.

                      – Werner
                      Apr 1 at 19:22











                    • @Werner Agree, thanks. Done.

                      – Kpym
                      Apr 1 at 19:30











                    • The pgfextra and {...} only to avoid { and }? ` tikz[z={(.4,.3)}]{def~{pic{cube}} path (2,0,2)~(2,0,1)~(0,0,0)~(1,0,0)~(2,0,0)~ (2,1,2)~(1,1,1)~(0,1,0)~(1,1,0)~ (0,2,2)~(1,2,2)~(0,2,1)~(0,2,0)~;}`

                      – marmot
                      Apr 1 at 20:23











                    • @marmot I never avoid shorter code in general ;) But here, as redefining ~ is not a good practice, I decided to follow the comment of @Werner and to make its definition as local as possible : so local to the path is better to local for the entire tikz.

                      – Kpym
                      Apr 1 at 20:49











                    • If that's your aim:documentclass[tikz,border=7pt]{standalone} tikzset{ cube/.pic={ draw[fill=black!20] (0,1,0) -- (0,1,1) -- (1,1,1) -- (1,1,0); draw[fill=black!50] (1,0,0) -- (1,0,1) -- (1,1,1) -- (1,1,0); draw[fill=white] (0,0,0) rectangle (1,1,0); },icube/.style={insert path={#1 pic{cube}}} } begin{document} tikz[z={(.4,.3)}]path[icube/.list={(2,0,2),(2,0,1),(0,0,0),(1,0,0),(2,0,0), (2,1,2),(1,1,1),(0,1,0),(1,1,0), (0,2,2),(1,2,2),(0,2,1),(0,2,0)}]; end{document}

                      – marmot
                      Apr 1 at 20:59














                    17












                    17








                    17







                    You can define a single cube as pic and place it where you want (starting from bottom back to top front).



                    documentclass[tikz,border=7pt]{standalone}
                    tikzset{
                    cube/.pic={
                    draw[fill=black!20] (0,1,0) -- (0,1,1) -- (1,1,1) -- (1,1,0);
                    draw[fill=black!50] (1,0,0) -- (1,0,1) -- (1,1,1) -- (1,1,0);
                    draw[fill=white] (0,0,0) rectangle (1,1,0);
                    }
                    }
                    begin{document}
                    tikz[z={(.4,.3)}]pathpgfextra{def~{pic{cube}}} % <--- to make the code shorter
                    (2,0,2)~(2,0,1)~(0,0,0)~(1,0,0)~(2,0,0)~
                    (2,1,2)~(1,1,1)~(0,1,0)~(1,1,0)~
                    (0,2,2)~(1,2,2)~(0,2,1)~(0,2,0)~;
                    end{document}


                    enter image description here






                    share|improve this answer















                    You can define a single cube as pic and place it where you want (starting from bottom back to top front).



                    documentclass[tikz,border=7pt]{standalone}
                    tikzset{
                    cube/.pic={
                    draw[fill=black!20] (0,1,0) -- (0,1,1) -- (1,1,1) -- (1,1,0);
                    draw[fill=black!50] (1,0,0) -- (1,0,1) -- (1,1,1) -- (1,1,0);
                    draw[fill=white] (0,0,0) rectangle (1,1,0);
                    }
                    }
                    begin{document}
                    tikz[z={(.4,.3)}]pathpgfextra{def~{pic{cube}}} % <--- to make the code shorter
                    (2,0,2)~(2,0,1)~(0,0,0)~(1,0,0)~(2,0,0)~
                    (2,1,2)~(1,1,1)~(0,1,0)~(1,1,0)~
                    (0,2,2)~(1,2,2)~(0,2,1)~(0,2,0)~;
                    end{document}


                    enter image description here







                    share|improve this answer














                    share|improve this answer



                    share|improve this answer








                    edited Apr 1 at 19:30

























                    answered Apr 1 at 11:49









                    KpymKpym

                    17.8k24191




                    17.8k24191








                    • 1





                      ...better to use the redefined ~ version inside a group, even if it's just to shorten your code. As in, begingroup def~{pic{code}} begin{tikzpicture} ... end{tikzpicture}.

                      – Werner
                      Apr 1 at 19:22











                    • @Werner Agree, thanks. Done.

                      – Kpym
                      Apr 1 at 19:30











                    • The pgfextra and {...} only to avoid { and }? ` tikz[z={(.4,.3)}]{def~{pic{cube}} path (2,0,2)~(2,0,1)~(0,0,0)~(1,0,0)~(2,0,0)~ (2,1,2)~(1,1,1)~(0,1,0)~(1,1,0)~ (0,2,2)~(1,2,2)~(0,2,1)~(0,2,0)~;}`

                      – marmot
                      Apr 1 at 20:23











                    • @marmot I never avoid shorter code in general ;) But here, as redefining ~ is not a good practice, I decided to follow the comment of @Werner and to make its definition as local as possible : so local to the path is better to local for the entire tikz.

                      – Kpym
                      Apr 1 at 20:49











                    • If that's your aim:documentclass[tikz,border=7pt]{standalone} tikzset{ cube/.pic={ draw[fill=black!20] (0,1,0) -- (0,1,1) -- (1,1,1) -- (1,1,0); draw[fill=black!50] (1,0,0) -- (1,0,1) -- (1,1,1) -- (1,1,0); draw[fill=white] (0,0,0) rectangle (1,1,0); },icube/.style={insert path={#1 pic{cube}}} } begin{document} tikz[z={(.4,.3)}]path[icube/.list={(2,0,2),(2,0,1),(0,0,0),(1,0,0),(2,0,0), (2,1,2),(1,1,1),(0,1,0),(1,1,0), (0,2,2),(1,2,2),(0,2,1),(0,2,0)}]; end{document}

                      – marmot
                      Apr 1 at 20:59














                    • 1





                      ...better to use the redefined ~ version inside a group, even if it's just to shorten your code. As in, begingroup def~{pic{code}} begin{tikzpicture} ... end{tikzpicture}.

                      – Werner
                      Apr 1 at 19:22











                    • @Werner Agree, thanks. Done.

                      – Kpym
                      Apr 1 at 19:30











                    • The pgfextra and {...} only to avoid { and }? ` tikz[z={(.4,.3)}]{def~{pic{cube}} path (2,0,2)~(2,0,1)~(0,0,0)~(1,0,0)~(2,0,0)~ (2,1,2)~(1,1,1)~(0,1,0)~(1,1,0)~ (0,2,2)~(1,2,2)~(0,2,1)~(0,2,0)~;}`

                      – marmot
                      Apr 1 at 20:23











                    • @marmot I never avoid shorter code in general ;) But here, as redefining ~ is not a good practice, I decided to follow the comment of @Werner and to make its definition as local as possible : so local to the path is better to local for the entire tikz.

                      – Kpym
                      Apr 1 at 20:49











                    • If that's your aim:documentclass[tikz,border=7pt]{standalone} tikzset{ cube/.pic={ draw[fill=black!20] (0,1,0) -- (0,1,1) -- (1,1,1) -- (1,1,0); draw[fill=black!50] (1,0,0) -- (1,0,1) -- (1,1,1) -- (1,1,0); draw[fill=white] (0,0,0) rectangle (1,1,0); },icube/.style={insert path={#1 pic{cube}}} } begin{document} tikz[z={(.4,.3)}]path[icube/.list={(2,0,2),(2,0,1),(0,0,0),(1,0,0),(2,0,0), (2,1,2),(1,1,1),(0,1,0),(1,1,0), (0,2,2),(1,2,2),(0,2,1),(0,2,0)}]; end{document}

                      – marmot
                      Apr 1 at 20:59








                    1




                    1





                    ...better to use the redefined ~ version inside a group, even if it's just to shorten your code. As in, begingroup def~{pic{code}} begin{tikzpicture} ... end{tikzpicture}.

                    – Werner
                    Apr 1 at 19:22





                    ...better to use the redefined ~ version inside a group, even if it's just to shorten your code. As in, begingroup def~{pic{code}} begin{tikzpicture} ... end{tikzpicture}.

                    – Werner
                    Apr 1 at 19:22













                    @Werner Agree, thanks. Done.

                    – Kpym
                    Apr 1 at 19:30





                    @Werner Agree, thanks. Done.

                    – Kpym
                    Apr 1 at 19:30













                    The pgfextra and {...} only to avoid { and }? ` tikz[z={(.4,.3)}]{def~{pic{cube}} path (2,0,2)~(2,0,1)~(0,0,0)~(1,0,0)~(2,0,0)~ (2,1,2)~(1,1,1)~(0,1,0)~(1,1,0)~ (0,2,2)~(1,2,2)~(0,2,1)~(0,2,0)~;}`

                    – marmot
                    Apr 1 at 20:23





                    The pgfextra and {...} only to avoid { and }? ` tikz[z={(.4,.3)}]{def~{pic{cube}} path (2,0,2)~(2,0,1)~(0,0,0)~(1,0,0)~(2,0,0)~ (2,1,2)~(1,1,1)~(0,1,0)~(1,1,0)~ (0,2,2)~(1,2,2)~(0,2,1)~(0,2,0)~;}`

                    – marmot
                    Apr 1 at 20:23













                    @marmot I never avoid shorter code in general ;) But here, as redefining ~ is not a good practice, I decided to follow the comment of @Werner and to make its definition as local as possible : so local to the path is better to local for the entire tikz.

                    – Kpym
                    Apr 1 at 20:49





                    @marmot I never avoid shorter code in general ;) But here, as redefining ~ is not a good practice, I decided to follow the comment of @Werner and to make its definition as local as possible : so local to the path is better to local for the entire tikz.

                    – Kpym
                    Apr 1 at 20:49













                    If that's your aim:documentclass[tikz,border=7pt]{standalone} tikzset{ cube/.pic={ draw[fill=black!20] (0,1,0) -- (0,1,1) -- (1,1,1) -- (1,1,0); draw[fill=black!50] (1,0,0) -- (1,0,1) -- (1,1,1) -- (1,1,0); draw[fill=white] (0,0,0) rectangle (1,1,0); },icube/.style={insert path={#1 pic{cube}}} } begin{document} tikz[z={(.4,.3)}]path[icube/.list={(2,0,2),(2,0,1),(0,0,0),(1,0,0),(2,0,0), (2,1,2),(1,1,1),(0,1,0),(1,1,0), (0,2,2),(1,2,2),(0,2,1),(0,2,0)}]; end{document}

                    – marmot
                    Apr 1 at 20:59





                    If that's your aim:documentclass[tikz,border=7pt]{standalone} tikzset{ cube/.pic={ draw[fill=black!20] (0,1,0) -- (0,1,1) -- (1,1,1) -- (1,1,0); draw[fill=black!50] (1,0,0) -- (1,0,1) -- (1,1,1) -- (1,1,0); draw[fill=white] (0,0,0) rectangle (1,1,0); },icube/.style={insert path={#1 pic{cube}}} } begin{document} tikz[z={(.4,.3)}]path[icube/.list={(2,0,2),(2,0,1),(0,0,0),(1,0,0),(2,0,0), (2,1,2),(1,1,1),(0,1,0),(1,1,0), (0,2,2),(1,2,2),(0,2,1),(0,2,0)}]; end{document}

                    – marmot
                    Apr 1 at 20:59











                    10














                    I would like to argue that one should use orthographic projections and write it in such a way that one can change the view angle. There are already many posts on this, perhaps most impressingly this one. The idea to use pics for the unit cubes to draw 3d cubes with some little cubes missing is also not new, it has been used here, where the cubes are rotatable in 3d. I just recycled the code to get



                    documentclass[tikz,border=3.14mm]{standalone}
                    usepackage{tikz-3dplot}
                    usetikzlibrary{calc}
                    tikzset{plane/.style n args={3}{insert path={%
                    #1 -- ++ #2 -- ++ #3 -- ++ ($-1*#2$) -- cycle}},
                    unit xy plane/.style={plane={#1}{(1,0,0)}{(0,1,0)}},
                    unit xz plane/.style={plane={#1}{(1,0,0)}{(0,0,1)}},
                    unit yz plane/.style={plane={#1}{(0,1,0)}{(0,0,1)}},
                    get projections/.style={insert path={%
                    let p1=(1,0,0),p2=(0,1,0) in
                    [/utils/exec={pgfmathtruncatemacro{xproj}{sign(x1)}xdefxproj{xproj}
                    pgfmathtruncatemacro{yproj}{sign(x2)}xdefyproj{yproj}
                    pgfmathtruncatemacro{zproj}{sign(cos(tdplotmaintheta))}xdefzproj{zproj}}]}},
                    pics/unit cube/.style={code={
                    path[get projections];
                    draw (0,0,0) -- (1,1,1);
                    ifnumzproj=-1
                    path[3d cube/every face,3d cube/xy face,unit xy plane={(0,0,0)}];
                    fi
                    ifnumyproj=1
                    path[3d cube/every face,3d cube/yz face,unit yz plane={(1,0,0)}];
                    else
                    path[3d cube/every face,3d cube/yz face,unit yz plane={(0,0,0)}];
                    fi
                    ifnumxproj=1
                    path[3d cube/every face,3d cube/xz face,unit xz plane={(0,0,0)}];
                    else
                    path[3d cube/every face,3d cube/xz face,unit xz plane={(0,1,0)}];
                    fi
                    ifnumzproj>-1
                    path[3d cube/every face,3d cube/xy face,unit xy plane={(0,0,1)}];
                    fi
                    }},
                    3d cube/.cd,
                    xy face/.style={fill=gray!20},
                    xz face/.style={fill=gray!50},
                    yz face/.style={fill=gray!90},
                    every face/.style={draw,very thick}
                    }
                    begin{document}
                    foreach Angle in {5,15,...,355}
                    {tdplotsetmaincoords{60}{Angle} % the first argument cannot be larger than 90
                    begin{tikzpicture}[line join=round]
                    pgfmathtruncatemacro{NumCubes}{7}
                    path[use as bounding box] (-NumCubes/2-3,-NumCubes/2-2)
                    rectangle (NumCubes/2+3,NumCubes/2+4);
                    begin{scope}[tdplot_main_coords]
                    pgfmathtruncatemacro{NextToLast}{NumCubes-1}
                    path[get projections];
                    ifnumyproj=1
                    defLstX{1,2,3}
                    else
                    defLstX{3,2,1}
                    fi
                    ifnumxproj=-1
                    defLstY{1,2,3}
                    else
                    defLstY{3,2,1}
                    fi
                    foreach X in LstX
                    {foreach Y in LstY
                    {ifnumY=3
                    pgfmathtruncatemacro{Zmax}{5-max(X,2)}
                    else
                    pgfmathtruncatemacro{Zmax}{4-X}
                    fi
                    foreach Z in {1,...,Zmax}
                    {path (X-2,Y-2,Z-1) pic{unit cube};}}
                    }
                    end{scope}
                    end{tikzpicture}}
                    end{document}


                    enter image description here






                    share|improve this answer
























                    • "I would like to argue that one should use orthographic projections". Spoken like a true engineer! +1

                      – Steven B. Segletes
                      Apr 1 at 14:13
















                    10














                    I would like to argue that one should use orthographic projections and write it in such a way that one can change the view angle. There are already many posts on this, perhaps most impressingly this one. The idea to use pics for the unit cubes to draw 3d cubes with some little cubes missing is also not new, it has been used here, where the cubes are rotatable in 3d. I just recycled the code to get



                    documentclass[tikz,border=3.14mm]{standalone}
                    usepackage{tikz-3dplot}
                    usetikzlibrary{calc}
                    tikzset{plane/.style n args={3}{insert path={%
                    #1 -- ++ #2 -- ++ #3 -- ++ ($-1*#2$) -- cycle}},
                    unit xy plane/.style={plane={#1}{(1,0,0)}{(0,1,0)}},
                    unit xz plane/.style={plane={#1}{(1,0,0)}{(0,0,1)}},
                    unit yz plane/.style={plane={#1}{(0,1,0)}{(0,0,1)}},
                    get projections/.style={insert path={%
                    let p1=(1,0,0),p2=(0,1,0) in
                    [/utils/exec={pgfmathtruncatemacro{xproj}{sign(x1)}xdefxproj{xproj}
                    pgfmathtruncatemacro{yproj}{sign(x2)}xdefyproj{yproj}
                    pgfmathtruncatemacro{zproj}{sign(cos(tdplotmaintheta))}xdefzproj{zproj}}]}},
                    pics/unit cube/.style={code={
                    path[get projections];
                    draw (0,0,0) -- (1,1,1);
                    ifnumzproj=-1
                    path[3d cube/every face,3d cube/xy face,unit xy plane={(0,0,0)}];
                    fi
                    ifnumyproj=1
                    path[3d cube/every face,3d cube/yz face,unit yz plane={(1,0,0)}];
                    else
                    path[3d cube/every face,3d cube/yz face,unit yz plane={(0,0,0)}];
                    fi
                    ifnumxproj=1
                    path[3d cube/every face,3d cube/xz face,unit xz plane={(0,0,0)}];
                    else
                    path[3d cube/every face,3d cube/xz face,unit xz plane={(0,1,0)}];
                    fi
                    ifnumzproj>-1
                    path[3d cube/every face,3d cube/xy face,unit xy plane={(0,0,1)}];
                    fi
                    }},
                    3d cube/.cd,
                    xy face/.style={fill=gray!20},
                    xz face/.style={fill=gray!50},
                    yz face/.style={fill=gray!90},
                    every face/.style={draw,very thick}
                    }
                    begin{document}
                    foreach Angle in {5,15,...,355}
                    {tdplotsetmaincoords{60}{Angle} % the first argument cannot be larger than 90
                    begin{tikzpicture}[line join=round]
                    pgfmathtruncatemacro{NumCubes}{7}
                    path[use as bounding box] (-NumCubes/2-3,-NumCubes/2-2)
                    rectangle (NumCubes/2+3,NumCubes/2+4);
                    begin{scope}[tdplot_main_coords]
                    pgfmathtruncatemacro{NextToLast}{NumCubes-1}
                    path[get projections];
                    ifnumyproj=1
                    defLstX{1,2,3}
                    else
                    defLstX{3,2,1}
                    fi
                    ifnumxproj=-1
                    defLstY{1,2,3}
                    else
                    defLstY{3,2,1}
                    fi
                    foreach X in LstX
                    {foreach Y in LstY
                    {ifnumY=3
                    pgfmathtruncatemacro{Zmax}{5-max(X,2)}
                    else
                    pgfmathtruncatemacro{Zmax}{4-X}
                    fi
                    foreach Z in {1,...,Zmax}
                    {path (X-2,Y-2,Z-1) pic{unit cube};}}
                    }
                    end{scope}
                    end{tikzpicture}}
                    end{document}


                    enter image description here






                    share|improve this answer
























                    • "I would like to argue that one should use orthographic projections". Spoken like a true engineer! +1

                      – Steven B. Segletes
                      Apr 1 at 14:13














                    10












                    10








                    10







                    I would like to argue that one should use orthographic projections and write it in such a way that one can change the view angle. There are already many posts on this, perhaps most impressingly this one. The idea to use pics for the unit cubes to draw 3d cubes with some little cubes missing is also not new, it has been used here, where the cubes are rotatable in 3d. I just recycled the code to get



                    documentclass[tikz,border=3.14mm]{standalone}
                    usepackage{tikz-3dplot}
                    usetikzlibrary{calc}
                    tikzset{plane/.style n args={3}{insert path={%
                    #1 -- ++ #2 -- ++ #3 -- ++ ($-1*#2$) -- cycle}},
                    unit xy plane/.style={plane={#1}{(1,0,0)}{(0,1,0)}},
                    unit xz plane/.style={plane={#1}{(1,0,0)}{(0,0,1)}},
                    unit yz plane/.style={plane={#1}{(0,1,0)}{(0,0,1)}},
                    get projections/.style={insert path={%
                    let p1=(1,0,0),p2=(0,1,0) in
                    [/utils/exec={pgfmathtruncatemacro{xproj}{sign(x1)}xdefxproj{xproj}
                    pgfmathtruncatemacro{yproj}{sign(x2)}xdefyproj{yproj}
                    pgfmathtruncatemacro{zproj}{sign(cos(tdplotmaintheta))}xdefzproj{zproj}}]}},
                    pics/unit cube/.style={code={
                    path[get projections];
                    draw (0,0,0) -- (1,1,1);
                    ifnumzproj=-1
                    path[3d cube/every face,3d cube/xy face,unit xy plane={(0,0,0)}];
                    fi
                    ifnumyproj=1
                    path[3d cube/every face,3d cube/yz face,unit yz plane={(1,0,0)}];
                    else
                    path[3d cube/every face,3d cube/yz face,unit yz plane={(0,0,0)}];
                    fi
                    ifnumxproj=1
                    path[3d cube/every face,3d cube/xz face,unit xz plane={(0,0,0)}];
                    else
                    path[3d cube/every face,3d cube/xz face,unit xz plane={(0,1,0)}];
                    fi
                    ifnumzproj>-1
                    path[3d cube/every face,3d cube/xy face,unit xy plane={(0,0,1)}];
                    fi
                    }},
                    3d cube/.cd,
                    xy face/.style={fill=gray!20},
                    xz face/.style={fill=gray!50},
                    yz face/.style={fill=gray!90},
                    every face/.style={draw,very thick}
                    }
                    begin{document}
                    foreach Angle in {5,15,...,355}
                    {tdplotsetmaincoords{60}{Angle} % the first argument cannot be larger than 90
                    begin{tikzpicture}[line join=round]
                    pgfmathtruncatemacro{NumCubes}{7}
                    path[use as bounding box] (-NumCubes/2-3,-NumCubes/2-2)
                    rectangle (NumCubes/2+3,NumCubes/2+4);
                    begin{scope}[tdplot_main_coords]
                    pgfmathtruncatemacro{NextToLast}{NumCubes-1}
                    path[get projections];
                    ifnumyproj=1
                    defLstX{1,2,3}
                    else
                    defLstX{3,2,1}
                    fi
                    ifnumxproj=-1
                    defLstY{1,2,3}
                    else
                    defLstY{3,2,1}
                    fi
                    foreach X in LstX
                    {foreach Y in LstY
                    {ifnumY=3
                    pgfmathtruncatemacro{Zmax}{5-max(X,2)}
                    else
                    pgfmathtruncatemacro{Zmax}{4-X}
                    fi
                    foreach Z in {1,...,Zmax}
                    {path (X-2,Y-2,Z-1) pic{unit cube};}}
                    }
                    end{scope}
                    end{tikzpicture}}
                    end{document}


                    enter image description here






                    share|improve this answer













                    I would like to argue that one should use orthographic projections and write it in such a way that one can change the view angle. There are already many posts on this, perhaps most impressingly this one. The idea to use pics for the unit cubes to draw 3d cubes with some little cubes missing is also not new, it has been used here, where the cubes are rotatable in 3d. I just recycled the code to get



                    documentclass[tikz,border=3.14mm]{standalone}
                    usepackage{tikz-3dplot}
                    usetikzlibrary{calc}
                    tikzset{plane/.style n args={3}{insert path={%
                    #1 -- ++ #2 -- ++ #3 -- ++ ($-1*#2$) -- cycle}},
                    unit xy plane/.style={plane={#1}{(1,0,0)}{(0,1,0)}},
                    unit xz plane/.style={plane={#1}{(1,0,0)}{(0,0,1)}},
                    unit yz plane/.style={plane={#1}{(0,1,0)}{(0,0,1)}},
                    get projections/.style={insert path={%
                    let p1=(1,0,0),p2=(0,1,0) in
                    [/utils/exec={pgfmathtruncatemacro{xproj}{sign(x1)}xdefxproj{xproj}
                    pgfmathtruncatemacro{yproj}{sign(x2)}xdefyproj{yproj}
                    pgfmathtruncatemacro{zproj}{sign(cos(tdplotmaintheta))}xdefzproj{zproj}}]}},
                    pics/unit cube/.style={code={
                    path[get projections];
                    draw (0,0,0) -- (1,1,1);
                    ifnumzproj=-1
                    path[3d cube/every face,3d cube/xy face,unit xy plane={(0,0,0)}];
                    fi
                    ifnumyproj=1
                    path[3d cube/every face,3d cube/yz face,unit yz plane={(1,0,0)}];
                    else
                    path[3d cube/every face,3d cube/yz face,unit yz plane={(0,0,0)}];
                    fi
                    ifnumxproj=1
                    path[3d cube/every face,3d cube/xz face,unit xz plane={(0,0,0)}];
                    else
                    path[3d cube/every face,3d cube/xz face,unit xz plane={(0,1,0)}];
                    fi
                    ifnumzproj>-1
                    path[3d cube/every face,3d cube/xy face,unit xy plane={(0,0,1)}];
                    fi
                    }},
                    3d cube/.cd,
                    xy face/.style={fill=gray!20},
                    xz face/.style={fill=gray!50},
                    yz face/.style={fill=gray!90},
                    every face/.style={draw,very thick}
                    }
                    begin{document}
                    foreach Angle in {5,15,...,355}
                    {tdplotsetmaincoords{60}{Angle} % the first argument cannot be larger than 90
                    begin{tikzpicture}[line join=round]
                    pgfmathtruncatemacro{NumCubes}{7}
                    path[use as bounding box] (-NumCubes/2-3,-NumCubes/2-2)
                    rectangle (NumCubes/2+3,NumCubes/2+4);
                    begin{scope}[tdplot_main_coords]
                    pgfmathtruncatemacro{NextToLast}{NumCubes-1}
                    path[get projections];
                    ifnumyproj=1
                    defLstX{1,2,3}
                    else
                    defLstX{3,2,1}
                    fi
                    ifnumxproj=-1
                    defLstY{1,2,3}
                    else
                    defLstY{3,2,1}
                    fi
                    foreach X in LstX
                    {foreach Y in LstY
                    {ifnumY=3
                    pgfmathtruncatemacro{Zmax}{5-max(X,2)}
                    else
                    pgfmathtruncatemacro{Zmax}{4-X}
                    fi
                    foreach Z in {1,...,Zmax}
                    {path (X-2,Y-2,Z-1) pic{unit cube};}}
                    }
                    end{scope}
                    end{tikzpicture}}
                    end{document}


                    enter image description here







                    share|improve this answer












                    share|improve this answer



                    share|improve this answer










                    answered Apr 1 at 14:11









                    marmotmarmot

                    116k5146277




                    116k5146277













                    • "I would like to argue that one should use orthographic projections". Spoken like a true engineer! +1

                      – Steven B. Segletes
                      Apr 1 at 14:13



















                    • "I would like to argue that one should use orthographic projections". Spoken like a true engineer! +1

                      – Steven B. Segletes
                      Apr 1 at 14:13

















                    "I would like to argue that one should use orthographic projections". Spoken like a true engineer! +1

                    – Steven B. Segletes
                    Apr 1 at 14:13





                    "I would like to argue that one should use orthographic projections". Spoken like a true engineer! +1

                    – Steven B. Segletes
                    Apr 1 at 14:13


















                    draft saved

                    draft discarded




















































                    Thanks for contributing an answer to TeX - LaTeX Stack Exchange!


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid



                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function () {
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f482561%2fincomplete-cube%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                    }
                    );

                    Post as a guest















                    Required, but never shown





















































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown

































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown







                    Popular posts from this blog

                    Bruad Bilen | Luke uk diar | NawigatsjuunCommonskategorii: BruadCommonskategorii: RunstükenWikiquote: Bruad

                    What is the offset in a seaplane's hull?

                    Slayer Innehåll Historia | Stil, komposition och lyrik | Bandets betydelse och framgångar | Sidoprojekt och samarbeten | Kontroverser | Medlemmar | Utmärkelser och nomineringar | Turnéer och festivaler | Diskografi | Referenser | Externa länkar | Navigeringsmenywww.slayer.net”Metal Massacre vol. 1””Metal Massacre vol. 3””Metal Massacre Volume III””Show No Mercy””Haunting the Chapel””Live Undead””Hell Awaits””Reign in Blood””Reign in Blood””Gold & Platinum – Reign in Blood””Golden Gods Awards Winners”originalet”Kerrang! Hall Of Fame””Slayer Looks Back On 37-Year Career In New Video Series: Part Two””South of Heaven””Gold & Platinum – South of Heaven””Seasons in the Abyss””Gold & Platinum - Seasons in the Abyss””Divine Intervention””Divine Intervention - Release group by Slayer””Gold & Platinum - Divine Intervention””Live Intrusion””Undisputed Attitude””Abolish Government/Superficial Love””Release “Slatanic Slaughter: A Tribute to Slayer” by Various Artists””Diabolus in Musica””Soundtrack to the Apocalypse””God Hates Us All””Systematic - Relationships””War at the Warfield””Gold & Platinum - War at the Warfield””Soundtrack to the Apocalypse””Gold & Platinum - Still Reigning””Metallica, Slayer, Iron Mauden Among Winners At Metal Hammer Awards””Eternal Pyre””Eternal Pyre - Slayer release group””Eternal Pyre””Metal Storm Awards 2006””Kerrang! Hall Of Fame””Slayer Wins 'Best Metal' Grammy Award””Slayer Guitarist Jeff Hanneman Dies””Bullet-For My Valentine booed at Metal Hammer Golden Gods Awards””Unholy Aliance””The End Of Slayer?””Slayer: We Could Thrash Out Two More Albums If We're Fast Enough...””'The Unholy Alliance: Chapter III' UK Dates Added”originalet”Megadeth And Slayer To Co-Headline 'Canadian Carnage' Trek”originalet”World Painted Blood””Release “World Painted Blood” by Slayer””Metallica Heading To Cinemas””Slayer, Megadeth To Join Forces For 'European Carnage' Tour - Dec. 18, 2010”originalet”Slayer's Hanneman Contracts Acute Infection; Band To Bring In Guest Guitarist””Cannibal Corpse's Pat O'Brien Will Step In As Slayer's Guest Guitarist”originalet”Slayer’s Jeff Hanneman Dead at 49””Dave Lombardo Says He Made Only $67,000 In 2011 While Touring With Slayer””Slayer: We Do Not Agree With Dave Lombardo's Substance Or Timeline Of Events””Slayer Welcomes Drummer Paul Bostaph Back To The Fold””Slayer Hope to Unveil Never-Before-Heard Jeff Hanneman Material on Next Album””Slayer Debut New Song 'Implode' During Surprise Golden Gods Appearance””Release group Repentless by Slayer””Repentless - Slayer - Credits””Slayer””Metal Storm Awards 2015””Slayer - to release comic book "Repentless #1"””Slayer To Release 'Repentless' 6.66" Vinyl Box Set””BREAKING NEWS: Slayer Announce Farewell Tour””Slayer Recruit Lamb of God, Anthrax, Behemoth + Testament for Final Tour””Slayer lägger ner efter 37 år””Slayer Announces Second North American Leg Of 'Final' Tour””Final World Tour””Slayer Announces Final European Tour With Lamb of God, Anthrax And Obituary””Slayer To Tour Europe With Lamb of God, Anthrax And Obituary””Slayer To Play 'Last French Show Ever' At Next Year's Hellfst””Slayer's Final World Tour Will Extend Into 2019””Death Angel's Rob Cavestany On Slayer's 'Farewell' Tour: 'Some Of Us Could See This Coming'””Testament Has No Plans To Retire Anytime Soon, Says Chuck Billy””Anthrax's Scott Ian On Slayer's 'Farewell' Tour Plans: 'I Was Surprised And I Wasn't Surprised'””Slayer””Slayer's Morbid Schlock””Review/Rock; For Slayer, the Mania Is the Message””Slayer - Biography””Slayer - Reign In Blood”originalet”Dave Lombardo””An exclusive oral history of Slayer”originalet”Exclusive! Interview With Slayer Guitarist Jeff Hanneman”originalet”Thinking Out Loud: Slayer's Kerry King on hair metal, Satan and being polite””Slayer Lyrics””Slayer - Biography””Most influential artists for extreme metal music””Slayer - Reign in Blood””Slayer guitarist Jeff Hanneman dies aged 49””Slatanic Slaughter: A Tribute to Slayer””Gateway to Hell: A Tribute to Slayer””Covered In Blood””Slayer: The Origins of Thrash in San Francisco, CA.””Why They Rule - #6 Slayer”originalet”Guitar World's 100 Greatest Heavy Metal Guitarists Of All Time”originalet”The fans have spoken: Slayer comes out on top in readers' polls”originalet”Tribute to Jeff Hanneman (1964-2013)””Lamb Of God Frontman: We Sound Like A Slayer Rip-Off””BEHEMOTH Frontman Pays Tribute To SLAYER's JEFF HANNEMAN””Slayer, Hatebreed Doing Double Duty On This Year's Ozzfest””System of a Down””Lacuna Coil’s Andrea Ferro Talks Influences, Skateboarding, Band Origins + More””Slayer - Reign in Blood””Into The Lungs of Hell””Slayer rules - en utställning om fans””Slayer and Their Fans Slashed Through a No-Holds-Barred Night at Gas Monkey””Home””Slayer””Gold & Platinum - The Big 4 Live from Sofia, Bulgaria””Exclusive! Interview With Slayer Guitarist Kerry King””2008-02-23: Wiltern, Los Angeles, CA, USA””Slayer's Kerry King To Perform With Megadeth Tonight! - Oct. 21, 2010”originalet”Dave Lombardo - Biography”Slayer Case DismissedArkiveradUltimate Classic Rock: Slayer guitarist Jeff Hanneman dead at 49.”Slayer: "We could never do any thing like Some Kind Of Monster..."””Cannibal Corpse'S Pat O'Brien Will Step In As Slayer'S Guest Guitarist | The Official Slayer Site”originalet”Slayer Wins 'Best Metal' Grammy Award””Slayer Guitarist Jeff Hanneman Dies””Kerrang! Awards 2006 Blog: Kerrang! Hall Of Fame””Kerrang! Awards 2013: Kerrang! Legend”originalet”Metallica, Slayer, Iron Maien Among Winners At Metal Hammer Awards””Metal Hammer Golden Gods Awards””Bullet For My Valentine Booed At Metal Hammer Golden Gods Awards””Metal Storm Awards 2006””Metal Storm Awards 2015””Slayer's Concert History””Slayer - Relationships””Slayer - Releases”Slayers officiella webbplatsSlayer på MusicBrainzOfficiell webbplatsSlayerSlayerr1373445760000 0001 1540 47353068615-5086262726cb13906545x(data)6033143kn20030215029