What does the same-ish mean?





.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty{ margin-bottom:0;
}







8















I encounter such a sentence in a homework assignment:




It seems that the burn-in is adequate, that they are all converging to
the same-ish posteriour value, and that there is good mixing.




I don't know if the -ish is appended here just to reduce the extent of sameness? Is it just a synonym of similar or alike and etc?



And can I add -ish to any adjective to convey a same-ish meaning?










share|improve this question




















  • 3





    ish = 'or thereabouts'

    – mcalex
    Apr 2 at 9:16






  • 2





    Whenever I hear someone say 'this-or-that-ish', I append in my mind the words: 'Well, sort of!'

    – yunzen
    Apr 2 at 9:19













  • "... they are all converging to similar posterior(u)r values". And "same-ish" would imply that they values were similar enough for whatever purpose they were being used.

    – alephzero
    Apr 2 at 13:24






  • 1





    I agree with your conclusion that it "reduces the extent of X-ness". In this sentence I would replace "the same-ish" by "almost the same" or "roughly the same"

    – Michael Kay
    Apr 2 at 22:07






  • 1





    To the extent of my Chinese knowledge, it means "差不多”

    – The Photon
    Apr 3 at 0:54


















8















I encounter such a sentence in a homework assignment:




It seems that the burn-in is adequate, that they are all converging to
the same-ish posteriour value, and that there is good mixing.




I don't know if the -ish is appended here just to reduce the extent of sameness? Is it just a synonym of similar or alike and etc?



And can I add -ish to any adjective to convey a same-ish meaning?










share|improve this question




















  • 3





    ish = 'or thereabouts'

    – mcalex
    Apr 2 at 9:16






  • 2





    Whenever I hear someone say 'this-or-that-ish', I append in my mind the words: 'Well, sort of!'

    – yunzen
    Apr 2 at 9:19













  • "... they are all converging to similar posterior(u)r values". And "same-ish" would imply that they values were similar enough for whatever purpose they were being used.

    – alephzero
    Apr 2 at 13:24






  • 1





    I agree with your conclusion that it "reduces the extent of X-ness". In this sentence I would replace "the same-ish" by "almost the same" or "roughly the same"

    – Michael Kay
    Apr 2 at 22:07






  • 1





    To the extent of my Chinese knowledge, it means "差不多”

    – The Photon
    Apr 3 at 0:54














8












8








8


2






I encounter such a sentence in a homework assignment:




It seems that the burn-in is adequate, that they are all converging to
the same-ish posteriour value, and that there is good mixing.




I don't know if the -ish is appended here just to reduce the extent of sameness? Is it just a synonym of similar or alike and etc?



And can I add -ish to any adjective to convey a same-ish meaning?










share|improve this question
















I encounter such a sentence in a homework assignment:




It seems that the burn-in is adequate, that they are all converging to
the same-ish posteriour value, and that there is good mixing.




I don't know if the -ish is appended here just to reduce the extent of sameness? Is it just a synonym of similar or alike and etc?



And can I add -ish to any adjective to convey a same-ish meaning?







grammar word-usage adjectives suffixes






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited Apr 2 at 15:10









J.R.

100k8129249




100k8129249










asked Apr 2 at 7:53









Lerner ZhangLerner Zhang

89611129




89611129








  • 3





    ish = 'or thereabouts'

    – mcalex
    Apr 2 at 9:16






  • 2





    Whenever I hear someone say 'this-or-that-ish', I append in my mind the words: 'Well, sort of!'

    – yunzen
    Apr 2 at 9:19













  • "... they are all converging to similar posterior(u)r values". And "same-ish" would imply that they values were similar enough for whatever purpose they were being used.

    – alephzero
    Apr 2 at 13:24






  • 1





    I agree with your conclusion that it "reduces the extent of X-ness". In this sentence I would replace "the same-ish" by "almost the same" or "roughly the same"

    – Michael Kay
    Apr 2 at 22:07






  • 1





    To the extent of my Chinese knowledge, it means "差不多”

    – The Photon
    Apr 3 at 0:54














  • 3





    ish = 'or thereabouts'

    – mcalex
    Apr 2 at 9:16






  • 2





    Whenever I hear someone say 'this-or-that-ish', I append in my mind the words: 'Well, sort of!'

    – yunzen
    Apr 2 at 9:19













  • "... they are all converging to similar posterior(u)r values". And "same-ish" would imply that they values were similar enough for whatever purpose they were being used.

    – alephzero
    Apr 2 at 13:24






  • 1





    I agree with your conclusion that it "reduces the extent of X-ness". In this sentence I would replace "the same-ish" by "almost the same" or "roughly the same"

    – Michael Kay
    Apr 2 at 22:07






  • 1





    To the extent of my Chinese knowledge, it means "差不多”

    – The Photon
    Apr 3 at 0:54








3




3





ish = 'or thereabouts'

– mcalex
Apr 2 at 9:16





ish = 'or thereabouts'

– mcalex
Apr 2 at 9:16




2




2





Whenever I hear someone say 'this-or-that-ish', I append in my mind the words: 'Well, sort of!'

– yunzen
Apr 2 at 9:19







Whenever I hear someone say 'this-or-that-ish', I append in my mind the words: 'Well, sort of!'

– yunzen
Apr 2 at 9:19















"... they are all converging to similar posterior(u)r values". And "same-ish" would imply that they values were similar enough for whatever purpose they were being used.

– alephzero
Apr 2 at 13:24





"... they are all converging to similar posterior(u)r values". And "same-ish" would imply that they values were similar enough for whatever purpose they were being used.

– alephzero
Apr 2 at 13:24




1




1





I agree with your conclusion that it "reduces the extent of X-ness". In this sentence I would replace "the same-ish" by "almost the same" or "roughly the same"

– Michael Kay
Apr 2 at 22:07





I agree with your conclusion that it "reduces the extent of X-ness". In this sentence I would replace "the same-ish" by "almost the same" or "roughly the same"

– Michael Kay
Apr 2 at 22:07




1




1





To the extent of my Chinese knowledge, it means "差不多”

– The Photon
Apr 3 at 0:54





To the extent of my Chinese knowledge, it means "差不多”

– The Photon
Apr 3 at 0:54










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















18














Adding an '-ish' at the end of a word is generally done in informal contexts, mostly to make the reference sound deliberately vague and approximate. (Source)



Here, the speaker has added the suffix because he isn't completely sure of the similarity with the posterior value.



You can add the suffix to words, to bring about a hint of uncertainty. For example,




Person 1 : What time is it?
Person 2 : I don't know. I think it should be around twelve-ish?





Update



As pointed out by Michael Kay, if the adjective points to an extreme, then '-ish' implies less extreme; 'small-ish' is less small than small; 'cold-ish' is less cold than cold; 'same-ish' is less similar than same. So '-ish' not only conveys approximation but can also assign less of the characteristic than if "-ish" were omitted.






share|improve this answer





















  • 2





    Note that if the adjective points to an extreme, then -ish implies less extreme; small-ish is less small than small; cold-ish is less cold than cold; same-ish is less similar than same. So it's not just approximate or vague; it's explicitly assigning less of the characteristic than if "-ish" were omitted.

    – Michael Kay
    Apr 2 at 22:02



















2














Another answer already explains the meaning of -ish, but I'd like to address this question you also asked:




can I add -ish to any adjective to convey a same-ish meaning?




My answer to that would be: perhaps – but don't overdo it.



The suffix works well for some adjectives, such as colors:




They're so slow that sedentary that algae grows on their coats, giving sloths a greenish tint that can be used as camouflage in the trees. (Indianapolis Star, 2018)




However, I would NOT recommend applying the suffix haphazardly to just about any adjective. There are many cases where an -ish suffix would sound, well, amateurish, where it would probably be better to avoid using it, especially in formal contexts.



For example, consider size adjectives. Adjectives that connote extremes (such as tiny, infinitesimal, massive, or vast) don't work very well with -ish, and the ngrams reflect that.



Also, if a friend asked if I was hungry, I suppose I could say, "I'm hungryish," but most natives would opt for a phrase like, "I'm kind of hungry," or "I'm a little hungry," instead, and the ngrams support that, too.



Other adjectives that sound odd with -ish would include: delicious, tired, or miserable, but faint and loud seem to work okay:




Two-thirds the way along the Arcturus-to-Vega line brings you to a pattern of four faintish stars resembling the shape of the stone block (The Telegraph, 2017)



On Monday night, a few dozen noodleists came out for cocktails, soup, loudish Ramones and the bar's retro, antique-radio vibe. (New York Times, 2014).




If your spellchecker puts a red squiggly line under a word with -ish, it might be better to use an adverb like rather instead. (For example: He was rather thirsty after the game might be a safer option than He was thirstyish after the game.)






share|improve this answer



















  • 2





    often when writing, people (at least in Britain), place a hyphen before the -ish suffix. There is a well known brand of ready made sauces in the UK, and they used to have TV ads featuring the same family. One seasonal ad played on the fact that people would have leftover turkey for some time after Christmas. The mother announced at supper time that they were having curry. The daughter speaks for them all when she says "It isn't turkey again, is it?" Mother says "Well, it's turk-ish".

    – Michael Harvey
    Apr 2 at 19:32








  • 1





    Some devout UK Jews describe themselves thus and denounce their less fervent brethren as being "Jew-ish".

    – Michael Harvey
    Apr 2 at 19:35













  • The reason "massive-ish" doesn't work very well is because "massive" means "very big" and "ish" means" not very", so "massive-ish" contradictory.

    – Acccumulation
    Apr 3 at 2:53











  • Isn't there an extra "that" in "They're so slow that sedentary that algae grows on their coats"? I see you are quoting the Indianapolis Star word by word, but I think it's a copy/paste error from the original National Geographic article

    – Fabio Turati
    Apr 3 at 9:21












Your Answer








StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "481"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fell.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f203478%2fwhat-does-the-same-ish-mean%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes








2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









18














Adding an '-ish' at the end of a word is generally done in informal contexts, mostly to make the reference sound deliberately vague and approximate. (Source)



Here, the speaker has added the suffix because he isn't completely sure of the similarity with the posterior value.



You can add the suffix to words, to bring about a hint of uncertainty. For example,




Person 1 : What time is it?
Person 2 : I don't know. I think it should be around twelve-ish?





Update



As pointed out by Michael Kay, if the adjective points to an extreme, then '-ish' implies less extreme; 'small-ish' is less small than small; 'cold-ish' is less cold than cold; 'same-ish' is less similar than same. So '-ish' not only conveys approximation but can also assign less of the characteristic than if "-ish" were omitted.






share|improve this answer





















  • 2





    Note that if the adjective points to an extreme, then -ish implies less extreme; small-ish is less small than small; cold-ish is less cold than cold; same-ish is less similar than same. So it's not just approximate or vague; it's explicitly assigning less of the characteristic than if "-ish" were omitted.

    – Michael Kay
    Apr 2 at 22:02
















18














Adding an '-ish' at the end of a word is generally done in informal contexts, mostly to make the reference sound deliberately vague and approximate. (Source)



Here, the speaker has added the suffix because he isn't completely sure of the similarity with the posterior value.



You can add the suffix to words, to bring about a hint of uncertainty. For example,




Person 1 : What time is it?
Person 2 : I don't know. I think it should be around twelve-ish?





Update



As pointed out by Michael Kay, if the adjective points to an extreme, then '-ish' implies less extreme; 'small-ish' is less small than small; 'cold-ish' is less cold than cold; 'same-ish' is less similar than same. So '-ish' not only conveys approximation but can also assign less of the characteristic than if "-ish" were omitted.






share|improve this answer





















  • 2





    Note that if the adjective points to an extreme, then -ish implies less extreme; small-ish is less small than small; cold-ish is less cold than cold; same-ish is less similar than same. So it's not just approximate or vague; it's explicitly assigning less of the characteristic than if "-ish" were omitted.

    – Michael Kay
    Apr 2 at 22:02














18












18








18







Adding an '-ish' at the end of a word is generally done in informal contexts, mostly to make the reference sound deliberately vague and approximate. (Source)



Here, the speaker has added the suffix because he isn't completely sure of the similarity with the posterior value.



You can add the suffix to words, to bring about a hint of uncertainty. For example,




Person 1 : What time is it?
Person 2 : I don't know. I think it should be around twelve-ish?





Update



As pointed out by Michael Kay, if the adjective points to an extreme, then '-ish' implies less extreme; 'small-ish' is less small than small; 'cold-ish' is less cold than cold; 'same-ish' is less similar than same. So '-ish' not only conveys approximation but can also assign less of the characteristic than if "-ish" were omitted.






share|improve this answer















Adding an '-ish' at the end of a word is generally done in informal contexts, mostly to make the reference sound deliberately vague and approximate. (Source)



Here, the speaker has added the suffix because he isn't completely sure of the similarity with the posterior value.



You can add the suffix to words, to bring about a hint of uncertainty. For example,




Person 1 : What time is it?
Person 2 : I don't know. I think it should be around twelve-ish?





Update



As pointed out by Michael Kay, if the adjective points to an extreme, then '-ish' implies less extreme; 'small-ish' is less small than small; 'cold-ish' is less cold than cold; 'same-ish' is less similar than same. So '-ish' not only conveys approximation but can also assign less of the characteristic than if "-ish" were omitted.







share|improve this answer














share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer








edited Apr 3 at 6:22

























answered Apr 2 at 8:03









Varun NairVarun Nair

7,32351944




7,32351944








  • 2





    Note that if the adjective points to an extreme, then -ish implies less extreme; small-ish is less small than small; cold-ish is less cold than cold; same-ish is less similar than same. So it's not just approximate or vague; it's explicitly assigning less of the characteristic than if "-ish" were omitted.

    – Michael Kay
    Apr 2 at 22:02














  • 2





    Note that if the adjective points to an extreme, then -ish implies less extreme; small-ish is less small than small; cold-ish is less cold than cold; same-ish is less similar than same. So it's not just approximate or vague; it's explicitly assigning less of the characteristic than if "-ish" were omitted.

    – Michael Kay
    Apr 2 at 22:02








2




2





Note that if the adjective points to an extreme, then -ish implies less extreme; small-ish is less small than small; cold-ish is less cold than cold; same-ish is less similar than same. So it's not just approximate or vague; it's explicitly assigning less of the characteristic than if "-ish" were omitted.

– Michael Kay
Apr 2 at 22:02





Note that if the adjective points to an extreme, then -ish implies less extreme; small-ish is less small than small; cold-ish is less cold than cold; same-ish is less similar than same. So it's not just approximate or vague; it's explicitly assigning less of the characteristic than if "-ish" were omitted.

– Michael Kay
Apr 2 at 22:02













2














Another answer already explains the meaning of -ish, but I'd like to address this question you also asked:




can I add -ish to any adjective to convey a same-ish meaning?




My answer to that would be: perhaps – but don't overdo it.



The suffix works well for some adjectives, such as colors:




They're so slow that sedentary that algae grows on their coats, giving sloths a greenish tint that can be used as camouflage in the trees. (Indianapolis Star, 2018)




However, I would NOT recommend applying the suffix haphazardly to just about any adjective. There are many cases where an -ish suffix would sound, well, amateurish, where it would probably be better to avoid using it, especially in formal contexts.



For example, consider size adjectives. Adjectives that connote extremes (such as tiny, infinitesimal, massive, or vast) don't work very well with -ish, and the ngrams reflect that.



Also, if a friend asked if I was hungry, I suppose I could say, "I'm hungryish," but most natives would opt for a phrase like, "I'm kind of hungry," or "I'm a little hungry," instead, and the ngrams support that, too.



Other adjectives that sound odd with -ish would include: delicious, tired, or miserable, but faint and loud seem to work okay:




Two-thirds the way along the Arcturus-to-Vega line brings you to a pattern of four faintish stars resembling the shape of the stone block (The Telegraph, 2017)



On Monday night, a few dozen noodleists came out for cocktails, soup, loudish Ramones and the bar's retro, antique-radio vibe. (New York Times, 2014).




If your spellchecker puts a red squiggly line under a word with -ish, it might be better to use an adverb like rather instead. (For example: He was rather thirsty after the game might be a safer option than He was thirstyish after the game.)






share|improve this answer



















  • 2





    often when writing, people (at least in Britain), place a hyphen before the -ish suffix. There is a well known brand of ready made sauces in the UK, and they used to have TV ads featuring the same family. One seasonal ad played on the fact that people would have leftover turkey for some time after Christmas. The mother announced at supper time that they were having curry. The daughter speaks for them all when she says "It isn't turkey again, is it?" Mother says "Well, it's turk-ish".

    – Michael Harvey
    Apr 2 at 19:32








  • 1





    Some devout UK Jews describe themselves thus and denounce their less fervent brethren as being "Jew-ish".

    – Michael Harvey
    Apr 2 at 19:35













  • The reason "massive-ish" doesn't work very well is because "massive" means "very big" and "ish" means" not very", so "massive-ish" contradictory.

    – Acccumulation
    Apr 3 at 2:53











  • Isn't there an extra "that" in "They're so slow that sedentary that algae grows on their coats"? I see you are quoting the Indianapolis Star word by word, but I think it's a copy/paste error from the original National Geographic article

    – Fabio Turati
    Apr 3 at 9:21
















2














Another answer already explains the meaning of -ish, but I'd like to address this question you also asked:




can I add -ish to any adjective to convey a same-ish meaning?




My answer to that would be: perhaps – but don't overdo it.



The suffix works well for some adjectives, such as colors:




They're so slow that sedentary that algae grows on their coats, giving sloths a greenish tint that can be used as camouflage in the trees. (Indianapolis Star, 2018)




However, I would NOT recommend applying the suffix haphazardly to just about any adjective. There are many cases where an -ish suffix would sound, well, amateurish, where it would probably be better to avoid using it, especially in formal contexts.



For example, consider size adjectives. Adjectives that connote extremes (such as tiny, infinitesimal, massive, or vast) don't work very well with -ish, and the ngrams reflect that.



Also, if a friend asked if I was hungry, I suppose I could say, "I'm hungryish," but most natives would opt for a phrase like, "I'm kind of hungry," or "I'm a little hungry," instead, and the ngrams support that, too.



Other adjectives that sound odd with -ish would include: delicious, tired, or miserable, but faint and loud seem to work okay:




Two-thirds the way along the Arcturus-to-Vega line brings you to a pattern of four faintish stars resembling the shape of the stone block (The Telegraph, 2017)



On Monday night, a few dozen noodleists came out for cocktails, soup, loudish Ramones and the bar's retro, antique-radio vibe. (New York Times, 2014).




If your spellchecker puts a red squiggly line under a word with -ish, it might be better to use an adverb like rather instead. (For example: He was rather thirsty after the game might be a safer option than He was thirstyish after the game.)






share|improve this answer



















  • 2





    often when writing, people (at least in Britain), place a hyphen before the -ish suffix. There is a well known brand of ready made sauces in the UK, and they used to have TV ads featuring the same family. One seasonal ad played on the fact that people would have leftover turkey for some time after Christmas. The mother announced at supper time that they were having curry. The daughter speaks for them all when she says "It isn't turkey again, is it?" Mother says "Well, it's turk-ish".

    – Michael Harvey
    Apr 2 at 19:32








  • 1





    Some devout UK Jews describe themselves thus and denounce their less fervent brethren as being "Jew-ish".

    – Michael Harvey
    Apr 2 at 19:35













  • The reason "massive-ish" doesn't work very well is because "massive" means "very big" and "ish" means" not very", so "massive-ish" contradictory.

    – Acccumulation
    Apr 3 at 2:53











  • Isn't there an extra "that" in "They're so slow that sedentary that algae grows on their coats"? I see you are quoting the Indianapolis Star word by word, but I think it's a copy/paste error from the original National Geographic article

    – Fabio Turati
    Apr 3 at 9:21














2












2








2







Another answer already explains the meaning of -ish, but I'd like to address this question you also asked:




can I add -ish to any adjective to convey a same-ish meaning?




My answer to that would be: perhaps – but don't overdo it.



The suffix works well for some adjectives, such as colors:




They're so slow that sedentary that algae grows on their coats, giving sloths a greenish tint that can be used as camouflage in the trees. (Indianapolis Star, 2018)




However, I would NOT recommend applying the suffix haphazardly to just about any adjective. There are many cases where an -ish suffix would sound, well, amateurish, where it would probably be better to avoid using it, especially in formal contexts.



For example, consider size adjectives. Adjectives that connote extremes (such as tiny, infinitesimal, massive, or vast) don't work very well with -ish, and the ngrams reflect that.



Also, if a friend asked if I was hungry, I suppose I could say, "I'm hungryish," but most natives would opt for a phrase like, "I'm kind of hungry," or "I'm a little hungry," instead, and the ngrams support that, too.



Other adjectives that sound odd with -ish would include: delicious, tired, or miserable, but faint and loud seem to work okay:




Two-thirds the way along the Arcturus-to-Vega line brings you to a pattern of four faintish stars resembling the shape of the stone block (The Telegraph, 2017)



On Monday night, a few dozen noodleists came out for cocktails, soup, loudish Ramones and the bar's retro, antique-radio vibe. (New York Times, 2014).




If your spellchecker puts a red squiggly line under a word with -ish, it might be better to use an adverb like rather instead. (For example: He was rather thirsty after the game might be a safer option than He was thirstyish after the game.)






share|improve this answer













Another answer already explains the meaning of -ish, but I'd like to address this question you also asked:




can I add -ish to any adjective to convey a same-ish meaning?




My answer to that would be: perhaps – but don't overdo it.



The suffix works well for some adjectives, such as colors:




They're so slow that sedentary that algae grows on their coats, giving sloths a greenish tint that can be used as camouflage in the trees. (Indianapolis Star, 2018)




However, I would NOT recommend applying the suffix haphazardly to just about any adjective. There are many cases where an -ish suffix would sound, well, amateurish, where it would probably be better to avoid using it, especially in formal contexts.



For example, consider size adjectives. Adjectives that connote extremes (such as tiny, infinitesimal, massive, or vast) don't work very well with -ish, and the ngrams reflect that.



Also, if a friend asked if I was hungry, I suppose I could say, "I'm hungryish," but most natives would opt for a phrase like, "I'm kind of hungry," or "I'm a little hungry," instead, and the ngrams support that, too.



Other adjectives that sound odd with -ish would include: delicious, tired, or miserable, but faint and loud seem to work okay:




Two-thirds the way along the Arcturus-to-Vega line brings you to a pattern of four faintish stars resembling the shape of the stone block (The Telegraph, 2017)



On Monday night, a few dozen noodleists came out for cocktails, soup, loudish Ramones and the bar's retro, antique-radio vibe. (New York Times, 2014).




If your spellchecker puts a red squiggly line under a word with -ish, it might be better to use an adverb like rather instead. (For example: He was rather thirsty after the game might be a safer option than He was thirstyish after the game.)







share|improve this answer












share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer










answered Apr 2 at 17:42









J.R.J.R.

100k8129249




100k8129249








  • 2





    often when writing, people (at least in Britain), place a hyphen before the -ish suffix. There is a well known brand of ready made sauces in the UK, and they used to have TV ads featuring the same family. One seasonal ad played on the fact that people would have leftover turkey for some time after Christmas. The mother announced at supper time that they were having curry. The daughter speaks for them all when she says "It isn't turkey again, is it?" Mother says "Well, it's turk-ish".

    – Michael Harvey
    Apr 2 at 19:32








  • 1





    Some devout UK Jews describe themselves thus and denounce their less fervent brethren as being "Jew-ish".

    – Michael Harvey
    Apr 2 at 19:35













  • The reason "massive-ish" doesn't work very well is because "massive" means "very big" and "ish" means" not very", so "massive-ish" contradictory.

    – Acccumulation
    Apr 3 at 2:53











  • Isn't there an extra "that" in "They're so slow that sedentary that algae grows on their coats"? I see you are quoting the Indianapolis Star word by word, but I think it's a copy/paste error from the original National Geographic article

    – Fabio Turati
    Apr 3 at 9:21














  • 2





    often when writing, people (at least in Britain), place a hyphen before the -ish suffix. There is a well known brand of ready made sauces in the UK, and they used to have TV ads featuring the same family. One seasonal ad played on the fact that people would have leftover turkey for some time after Christmas. The mother announced at supper time that they were having curry. The daughter speaks for them all when she says "It isn't turkey again, is it?" Mother says "Well, it's turk-ish".

    – Michael Harvey
    Apr 2 at 19:32








  • 1





    Some devout UK Jews describe themselves thus and denounce their less fervent brethren as being "Jew-ish".

    – Michael Harvey
    Apr 2 at 19:35













  • The reason "massive-ish" doesn't work very well is because "massive" means "very big" and "ish" means" not very", so "massive-ish" contradictory.

    – Acccumulation
    Apr 3 at 2:53











  • Isn't there an extra "that" in "They're so slow that sedentary that algae grows on their coats"? I see you are quoting the Indianapolis Star word by word, but I think it's a copy/paste error from the original National Geographic article

    – Fabio Turati
    Apr 3 at 9:21








2




2





often when writing, people (at least in Britain), place a hyphen before the -ish suffix. There is a well known brand of ready made sauces in the UK, and they used to have TV ads featuring the same family. One seasonal ad played on the fact that people would have leftover turkey for some time after Christmas. The mother announced at supper time that they were having curry. The daughter speaks for them all when she says "It isn't turkey again, is it?" Mother says "Well, it's turk-ish".

– Michael Harvey
Apr 2 at 19:32







often when writing, people (at least in Britain), place a hyphen before the -ish suffix. There is a well known brand of ready made sauces in the UK, and they used to have TV ads featuring the same family. One seasonal ad played on the fact that people would have leftover turkey for some time after Christmas. The mother announced at supper time that they were having curry. The daughter speaks for them all when she says "It isn't turkey again, is it?" Mother says "Well, it's turk-ish".

– Michael Harvey
Apr 2 at 19:32






1




1





Some devout UK Jews describe themselves thus and denounce their less fervent brethren as being "Jew-ish".

– Michael Harvey
Apr 2 at 19:35







Some devout UK Jews describe themselves thus and denounce their less fervent brethren as being "Jew-ish".

– Michael Harvey
Apr 2 at 19:35















The reason "massive-ish" doesn't work very well is because "massive" means "very big" and "ish" means" not very", so "massive-ish" contradictory.

– Acccumulation
Apr 3 at 2:53





The reason "massive-ish" doesn't work very well is because "massive" means "very big" and "ish" means" not very", so "massive-ish" contradictory.

– Acccumulation
Apr 3 at 2:53













Isn't there an extra "that" in "They're so slow that sedentary that algae grows on their coats"? I see you are quoting the Indianapolis Star word by word, but I think it's a copy/paste error from the original National Geographic article

– Fabio Turati
Apr 3 at 9:21





Isn't there an extra "that" in "They're so slow that sedentary that algae grows on their coats"? I see you are quoting the Indianapolis Star word by word, but I think it's a copy/paste error from the original National Geographic article

– Fabio Turati
Apr 3 at 9:21


















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to English Language Learners Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fell.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f203478%2fwhat-does-the-same-ish-mean%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Bruad Bilen | Luke uk diar | NawigatsjuunCommonskategorii: BruadCommonskategorii: RunstükenWikiquote: Bruad

What is the offset in a seaplane's hull?

Slayer Innehåll Historia | Stil, komposition och lyrik | Bandets betydelse och framgångar | Sidoprojekt och samarbeten | Kontroverser | Medlemmar | Utmärkelser och nomineringar | Turnéer och festivaler | Diskografi | Referenser | Externa länkar | Navigeringsmenywww.slayer.net”Metal Massacre vol. 1””Metal Massacre vol. 3””Metal Massacre Volume III””Show No Mercy””Haunting the Chapel””Live Undead””Hell Awaits””Reign in Blood””Reign in Blood””Gold & Platinum – Reign in Blood””Golden Gods Awards Winners”originalet”Kerrang! Hall Of Fame””Slayer Looks Back On 37-Year Career In New Video Series: Part Two””South of Heaven””Gold & Platinum – South of Heaven””Seasons in the Abyss””Gold & Platinum - Seasons in the Abyss””Divine Intervention””Divine Intervention - Release group by Slayer””Gold & Platinum - Divine Intervention””Live Intrusion””Undisputed Attitude””Abolish Government/Superficial Love””Release “Slatanic Slaughter: A Tribute to Slayer” by Various Artists””Diabolus in Musica””Soundtrack to the Apocalypse””God Hates Us All””Systematic - Relationships””War at the Warfield””Gold & Platinum - War at the Warfield””Soundtrack to the Apocalypse””Gold & Platinum - Still Reigning””Metallica, Slayer, Iron Mauden Among Winners At Metal Hammer Awards””Eternal Pyre””Eternal Pyre - Slayer release group””Eternal Pyre””Metal Storm Awards 2006””Kerrang! Hall Of Fame””Slayer Wins 'Best Metal' Grammy Award””Slayer Guitarist Jeff Hanneman Dies””Bullet-For My Valentine booed at Metal Hammer Golden Gods Awards””Unholy Aliance””The End Of Slayer?””Slayer: We Could Thrash Out Two More Albums If We're Fast Enough...””'The Unholy Alliance: Chapter III' UK Dates Added”originalet”Megadeth And Slayer To Co-Headline 'Canadian Carnage' Trek”originalet”World Painted Blood””Release “World Painted Blood” by Slayer””Metallica Heading To Cinemas””Slayer, Megadeth To Join Forces For 'European Carnage' Tour - Dec. 18, 2010”originalet”Slayer's Hanneman Contracts Acute Infection; Band To Bring In Guest Guitarist””Cannibal Corpse's Pat O'Brien Will Step In As Slayer's Guest Guitarist”originalet”Slayer’s Jeff Hanneman Dead at 49””Dave Lombardo Says He Made Only $67,000 In 2011 While Touring With Slayer””Slayer: We Do Not Agree With Dave Lombardo's Substance Or Timeline Of Events””Slayer Welcomes Drummer Paul Bostaph Back To The Fold””Slayer Hope to Unveil Never-Before-Heard Jeff Hanneman Material on Next Album””Slayer Debut New Song 'Implode' During Surprise Golden Gods Appearance””Release group Repentless by Slayer””Repentless - Slayer - Credits””Slayer””Metal Storm Awards 2015””Slayer - to release comic book "Repentless #1"””Slayer To Release 'Repentless' 6.66" Vinyl Box Set””BREAKING NEWS: Slayer Announce Farewell Tour””Slayer Recruit Lamb of God, Anthrax, Behemoth + Testament for Final Tour””Slayer lägger ner efter 37 år””Slayer Announces Second North American Leg Of 'Final' Tour””Final World Tour””Slayer Announces Final European Tour With Lamb of God, Anthrax And Obituary””Slayer To Tour Europe With Lamb of God, Anthrax And Obituary””Slayer To Play 'Last French Show Ever' At Next Year's Hellfst””Slayer's Final World Tour Will Extend Into 2019””Death Angel's Rob Cavestany On Slayer's 'Farewell' Tour: 'Some Of Us Could See This Coming'””Testament Has No Plans To Retire Anytime Soon, Says Chuck Billy””Anthrax's Scott Ian On Slayer's 'Farewell' Tour Plans: 'I Was Surprised And I Wasn't Surprised'””Slayer””Slayer's Morbid Schlock””Review/Rock; For Slayer, the Mania Is the Message””Slayer - Biography””Slayer - Reign In Blood”originalet”Dave Lombardo””An exclusive oral history of Slayer”originalet”Exclusive! Interview With Slayer Guitarist Jeff Hanneman”originalet”Thinking Out Loud: Slayer's Kerry King on hair metal, Satan and being polite””Slayer Lyrics””Slayer - Biography””Most influential artists for extreme metal music””Slayer - Reign in Blood””Slayer guitarist Jeff Hanneman dies aged 49””Slatanic Slaughter: A Tribute to Slayer””Gateway to Hell: A Tribute to Slayer””Covered In Blood””Slayer: The Origins of Thrash in San Francisco, CA.””Why They Rule - #6 Slayer”originalet”Guitar World's 100 Greatest Heavy Metal Guitarists Of All Time”originalet”The fans have spoken: Slayer comes out on top in readers' polls”originalet”Tribute to Jeff Hanneman (1964-2013)””Lamb Of God Frontman: We Sound Like A Slayer Rip-Off””BEHEMOTH Frontman Pays Tribute To SLAYER's JEFF HANNEMAN””Slayer, Hatebreed Doing Double Duty On This Year's Ozzfest””System of a Down””Lacuna Coil’s Andrea Ferro Talks Influences, Skateboarding, Band Origins + More””Slayer - Reign in Blood””Into The Lungs of Hell””Slayer rules - en utställning om fans””Slayer and Their Fans Slashed Through a No-Holds-Barred Night at Gas Monkey””Home””Slayer””Gold & Platinum - The Big 4 Live from Sofia, Bulgaria””Exclusive! Interview With Slayer Guitarist Kerry King””2008-02-23: Wiltern, Los Angeles, CA, USA””Slayer's Kerry King To Perform With Megadeth Tonight! - Oct. 21, 2010”originalet”Dave Lombardo - Biography”Slayer Case DismissedArkiveradUltimate Classic Rock: Slayer guitarist Jeff Hanneman dead at 49.”Slayer: "We could never do any thing like Some Kind Of Monster..."””Cannibal Corpse'S Pat O'Brien Will Step In As Slayer'S Guest Guitarist | The Official Slayer Site”originalet”Slayer Wins 'Best Metal' Grammy Award””Slayer Guitarist Jeff Hanneman Dies””Kerrang! Awards 2006 Blog: Kerrang! Hall Of Fame””Kerrang! Awards 2013: Kerrang! Legend”originalet”Metallica, Slayer, Iron Maien Among Winners At Metal Hammer Awards””Metal Hammer Golden Gods Awards””Bullet For My Valentine Booed At Metal Hammer Golden Gods Awards””Metal Storm Awards 2006””Metal Storm Awards 2015””Slayer's Concert History””Slayer - Relationships””Slayer - Releases”Slayers officiella webbplatsSlayer på MusicBrainzOfficiell webbplatsSlayerSlayerr1373445760000 0001 1540 47353068615-5086262726cb13906545x(data)6033143kn20030215029