subequations: How to continue numbering within subequation?












9















Let's assume we want to create one subequation including four aligned single equations. The first two single equations should be numbered as 1a and 1b while the third and fourth one should continue the numbering of the previous one, but with new equation number as 2a and 2b.





Minimum Working Example (MWE):



documentclass{article}
usepackage{amsmath}

begin{document}
begin{subequations}
begin{align}
1 &= 1\
2 &= 2\
3 &= 3\% from here a new equation number should begin
4 &= 4
end{align}
end{subequations}
end{document}




Screenshot of the result:



Screenshot of the result





Questions:




  1. How can I automatically continue numbering of the previous equation numbers without cheating around by manually assigning numbers/tags?

  2. Would it be possible to increase the vertical space between the equation 1-pair and the equation 2-pair?










share|improve this question

























  • I have removed my answer :-).

    – Sebastiano
    Apr 1 at 12:21











  • Should (2)s and (1)s be aligned? I don't think they should.

    – JouleV
    Apr 1 at 12:22






  • 1





    Split into two subequations.

    – ferahfeza
    Apr 1 at 12:23











  • @Sebastiano: I am very sorry for this! :-( But thank you very much for your efforts!

    – Dave
    Apr 1 at 12:23






  • 3





    I think it's a duplicate. Does tex.stackexchange.com/a/445115/4427 help?

    – egreg
    Apr 1 at 12:26


















9















Let's assume we want to create one subequation including four aligned single equations. The first two single equations should be numbered as 1a and 1b while the third and fourth one should continue the numbering of the previous one, but with new equation number as 2a and 2b.





Minimum Working Example (MWE):



documentclass{article}
usepackage{amsmath}

begin{document}
begin{subequations}
begin{align}
1 &= 1\
2 &= 2\
3 &= 3\% from here a new equation number should begin
4 &= 4
end{align}
end{subequations}
end{document}




Screenshot of the result:



Screenshot of the result





Questions:




  1. How can I automatically continue numbering of the previous equation numbers without cheating around by manually assigning numbers/tags?

  2. Would it be possible to increase the vertical space between the equation 1-pair and the equation 2-pair?










share|improve this question

























  • I have removed my answer :-).

    – Sebastiano
    Apr 1 at 12:21











  • Should (2)s and (1)s be aligned? I don't think they should.

    – JouleV
    Apr 1 at 12:22






  • 1





    Split into two subequations.

    – ferahfeza
    Apr 1 at 12:23











  • @Sebastiano: I am very sorry for this! :-( But thank you very much for your efforts!

    – Dave
    Apr 1 at 12:23






  • 3





    I think it's a duplicate. Does tex.stackexchange.com/a/445115/4427 help?

    – egreg
    Apr 1 at 12:26
















9












9








9








Let's assume we want to create one subequation including four aligned single equations. The first two single equations should be numbered as 1a and 1b while the third and fourth one should continue the numbering of the previous one, but with new equation number as 2a and 2b.





Minimum Working Example (MWE):



documentclass{article}
usepackage{amsmath}

begin{document}
begin{subequations}
begin{align}
1 &= 1\
2 &= 2\
3 &= 3\% from here a new equation number should begin
4 &= 4
end{align}
end{subequations}
end{document}




Screenshot of the result:



Screenshot of the result





Questions:




  1. How can I automatically continue numbering of the previous equation numbers without cheating around by manually assigning numbers/tags?

  2. Would it be possible to increase the vertical space between the equation 1-pair and the equation 2-pair?










share|improve this question
















Let's assume we want to create one subequation including four aligned single equations. The first two single equations should be numbered as 1a and 1b while the third and fourth one should continue the numbering of the previous one, but with new equation number as 2a and 2b.





Minimum Working Example (MWE):



documentclass{article}
usepackage{amsmath}

begin{document}
begin{subequations}
begin{align}
1 &= 1\
2 &= 2\
3 &= 3\% from here a new equation number should begin
4 &= 4
end{align}
end{subequations}
end{document}




Screenshot of the result:



Screenshot of the result





Questions:




  1. How can I automatically continue numbering of the previous equation numbers without cheating around by manually assigning numbers/tags?

  2. Would it be possible to increase the vertical space between the equation 1-pair and the equation 2-pair?







equations numbering align amsmath subequations






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited Apr 1 at 12:22







Dave

















asked Apr 1 at 12:06









DaveDave

1,234619




1,234619













  • I have removed my answer :-).

    – Sebastiano
    Apr 1 at 12:21











  • Should (2)s and (1)s be aligned? I don't think they should.

    – JouleV
    Apr 1 at 12:22






  • 1





    Split into two subequations.

    – ferahfeza
    Apr 1 at 12:23











  • @Sebastiano: I am very sorry for this! :-( But thank you very much for your efforts!

    – Dave
    Apr 1 at 12:23






  • 3





    I think it's a duplicate. Does tex.stackexchange.com/a/445115/4427 help?

    – egreg
    Apr 1 at 12:26





















  • I have removed my answer :-).

    – Sebastiano
    Apr 1 at 12:21











  • Should (2)s and (1)s be aligned? I don't think they should.

    – JouleV
    Apr 1 at 12:22






  • 1





    Split into two subequations.

    – ferahfeza
    Apr 1 at 12:23











  • @Sebastiano: I am very sorry for this! :-( But thank you very much for your efforts!

    – Dave
    Apr 1 at 12:23






  • 3





    I think it's a duplicate. Does tex.stackexchange.com/a/445115/4427 help?

    – egreg
    Apr 1 at 12:26



















I have removed my answer :-).

– Sebastiano
Apr 1 at 12:21





I have removed my answer :-).

– Sebastiano
Apr 1 at 12:21













Should (2)s and (1)s be aligned? I don't think they should.

– JouleV
Apr 1 at 12:22





Should (2)s and (1)s be aligned? I don't think they should.

– JouleV
Apr 1 at 12:22




1




1





Split into two subequations.

– ferahfeza
Apr 1 at 12:23





Split into two subequations.

– ferahfeza
Apr 1 at 12:23













@Sebastiano: I am very sorry for this! :-( But thank you very much for your efforts!

– Dave
Apr 1 at 12:23





@Sebastiano: I am very sorry for this! :-( But thank you very much for your efforts!

– Dave
Apr 1 at 12:23




3




3





I think it's a duplicate. Does tex.stackexchange.com/a/445115/4427 help?

– egreg
Apr 1 at 12:26







I think it's a duplicate. Does tex.stackexchange.com/a/445115/4427 help?

– egreg
Apr 1 at 12:26












1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















12














I could not find the duplicate, so here is my attempt:



documentclass{article}
usepackage{amsmath}
newcommandStepSubequations{
stepcounter{parentequation}
gdeftheparentequation{arabic{parentequation}}
setcounter{equation}{0}
}
begin{document}
begin{subequations}
begin{align}
1 &= 1\
2 &= 2\
StepSubequations
3 &= 3\% from here a new equation number should begin
4 &= 4
end{align}
end{subequations}

begin{equation}
label{eq:1}
a=b
end{equation}

end{document}





share|improve this answer



















  • 1





    Thank you very much! :-)

    – Dave
    Apr 1 at 12:28






  • 1





    Approved your code. :-)

    – Sebastiano
    Apr 1 at 12:29






  • 1





    Note that in egregs duplicated answer, xdef is used, where I here use gdef, so look out for differences.

    – daleif
    Apr 1 at 12:33











  • @daleif: I think there is some little issue when using documentclass{scrbook}: In scrbook all equation numbers will follow the format chapternumber.equationnumber, but your example does not include the chapternumber before equationnumber. Is there an option to fix that?

    – Dave
    Apr 1 at 14:27











  • @Dave see if you can guess what to change in the definition of StepSubequations, it is not that hard. Hint, you may want to add thechapter somewhere.

    – daleif
    Apr 1 at 14:39












Your Answer








StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "85"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f482575%2fsubequations-how-to-continue-numbering-within-subequation%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









12














I could not find the duplicate, so here is my attempt:



documentclass{article}
usepackage{amsmath}
newcommandStepSubequations{
stepcounter{parentequation}
gdeftheparentequation{arabic{parentequation}}
setcounter{equation}{0}
}
begin{document}
begin{subequations}
begin{align}
1 &= 1\
2 &= 2\
StepSubequations
3 &= 3\% from here a new equation number should begin
4 &= 4
end{align}
end{subequations}

begin{equation}
label{eq:1}
a=b
end{equation}

end{document}





share|improve this answer



















  • 1





    Thank you very much! :-)

    – Dave
    Apr 1 at 12:28






  • 1





    Approved your code. :-)

    – Sebastiano
    Apr 1 at 12:29






  • 1





    Note that in egregs duplicated answer, xdef is used, where I here use gdef, so look out for differences.

    – daleif
    Apr 1 at 12:33











  • @daleif: I think there is some little issue when using documentclass{scrbook}: In scrbook all equation numbers will follow the format chapternumber.equationnumber, but your example does not include the chapternumber before equationnumber. Is there an option to fix that?

    – Dave
    Apr 1 at 14:27











  • @Dave see if you can guess what to change in the definition of StepSubequations, it is not that hard. Hint, you may want to add thechapter somewhere.

    – daleif
    Apr 1 at 14:39
















12














I could not find the duplicate, so here is my attempt:



documentclass{article}
usepackage{amsmath}
newcommandStepSubequations{
stepcounter{parentequation}
gdeftheparentequation{arabic{parentequation}}
setcounter{equation}{0}
}
begin{document}
begin{subequations}
begin{align}
1 &= 1\
2 &= 2\
StepSubequations
3 &= 3\% from here a new equation number should begin
4 &= 4
end{align}
end{subequations}

begin{equation}
label{eq:1}
a=b
end{equation}

end{document}





share|improve this answer



















  • 1





    Thank you very much! :-)

    – Dave
    Apr 1 at 12:28






  • 1





    Approved your code. :-)

    – Sebastiano
    Apr 1 at 12:29






  • 1





    Note that in egregs duplicated answer, xdef is used, where I here use gdef, so look out for differences.

    – daleif
    Apr 1 at 12:33











  • @daleif: I think there is some little issue when using documentclass{scrbook}: In scrbook all equation numbers will follow the format chapternumber.equationnumber, but your example does not include the chapternumber before equationnumber. Is there an option to fix that?

    – Dave
    Apr 1 at 14:27











  • @Dave see if you can guess what to change in the definition of StepSubequations, it is not that hard. Hint, you may want to add thechapter somewhere.

    – daleif
    Apr 1 at 14:39














12












12








12







I could not find the duplicate, so here is my attempt:



documentclass{article}
usepackage{amsmath}
newcommandStepSubequations{
stepcounter{parentequation}
gdeftheparentequation{arabic{parentequation}}
setcounter{equation}{0}
}
begin{document}
begin{subequations}
begin{align}
1 &= 1\
2 &= 2\
StepSubequations
3 &= 3\% from here a new equation number should begin
4 &= 4
end{align}
end{subequations}

begin{equation}
label{eq:1}
a=b
end{equation}

end{document}





share|improve this answer













I could not find the duplicate, so here is my attempt:



documentclass{article}
usepackage{amsmath}
newcommandStepSubequations{
stepcounter{parentequation}
gdeftheparentequation{arabic{parentequation}}
setcounter{equation}{0}
}
begin{document}
begin{subequations}
begin{align}
1 &= 1\
2 &= 2\
StepSubequations
3 &= 3\% from here a new equation number should begin
4 &= 4
end{align}
end{subequations}

begin{equation}
label{eq:1}
a=b
end{equation}

end{document}






share|improve this answer












share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer










answered Apr 1 at 12:27









daleifdaleif

33.7k255118




33.7k255118








  • 1





    Thank you very much! :-)

    – Dave
    Apr 1 at 12:28






  • 1





    Approved your code. :-)

    – Sebastiano
    Apr 1 at 12:29






  • 1





    Note that in egregs duplicated answer, xdef is used, where I here use gdef, so look out for differences.

    – daleif
    Apr 1 at 12:33











  • @daleif: I think there is some little issue when using documentclass{scrbook}: In scrbook all equation numbers will follow the format chapternumber.equationnumber, but your example does not include the chapternumber before equationnumber. Is there an option to fix that?

    – Dave
    Apr 1 at 14:27











  • @Dave see if you can guess what to change in the definition of StepSubequations, it is not that hard. Hint, you may want to add thechapter somewhere.

    – daleif
    Apr 1 at 14:39














  • 1





    Thank you very much! :-)

    – Dave
    Apr 1 at 12:28






  • 1





    Approved your code. :-)

    – Sebastiano
    Apr 1 at 12:29






  • 1





    Note that in egregs duplicated answer, xdef is used, where I here use gdef, so look out for differences.

    – daleif
    Apr 1 at 12:33











  • @daleif: I think there is some little issue when using documentclass{scrbook}: In scrbook all equation numbers will follow the format chapternumber.equationnumber, but your example does not include the chapternumber before equationnumber. Is there an option to fix that?

    – Dave
    Apr 1 at 14:27











  • @Dave see if you can guess what to change in the definition of StepSubequations, it is not that hard. Hint, you may want to add thechapter somewhere.

    – daleif
    Apr 1 at 14:39








1




1





Thank you very much! :-)

– Dave
Apr 1 at 12:28





Thank you very much! :-)

– Dave
Apr 1 at 12:28




1




1





Approved your code. :-)

– Sebastiano
Apr 1 at 12:29





Approved your code. :-)

– Sebastiano
Apr 1 at 12:29




1




1





Note that in egregs duplicated answer, xdef is used, where I here use gdef, so look out for differences.

– daleif
Apr 1 at 12:33





Note that in egregs duplicated answer, xdef is used, where I here use gdef, so look out for differences.

– daleif
Apr 1 at 12:33













@daleif: I think there is some little issue when using documentclass{scrbook}: In scrbook all equation numbers will follow the format chapternumber.equationnumber, but your example does not include the chapternumber before equationnumber. Is there an option to fix that?

– Dave
Apr 1 at 14:27





@daleif: I think there is some little issue when using documentclass{scrbook}: In scrbook all equation numbers will follow the format chapternumber.equationnumber, but your example does not include the chapternumber before equationnumber. Is there an option to fix that?

– Dave
Apr 1 at 14:27













@Dave see if you can guess what to change in the definition of StepSubequations, it is not that hard. Hint, you may want to add thechapter somewhere.

– daleif
Apr 1 at 14:39





@Dave see if you can guess what to change in the definition of StepSubequations, it is not that hard. Hint, you may want to add thechapter somewhere.

– daleif
Apr 1 at 14:39


















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to TeX - LaTeX Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f482575%2fsubequations-how-to-continue-numbering-within-subequation%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Bruad Bilen | Luke uk diar | NawigatsjuunCommonskategorii: BruadCommonskategorii: RunstükenWikiquote: Bruad

What is the offset in a seaplane's hull?

Slayer Innehåll Historia | Stil, komposition och lyrik | Bandets betydelse och framgångar | Sidoprojekt och samarbeten | Kontroverser | Medlemmar | Utmärkelser och nomineringar | Turnéer och festivaler | Diskografi | Referenser | Externa länkar | Navigeringsmenywww.slayer.net”Metal Massacre vol. 1””Metal Massacre vol. 3””Metal Massacre Volume III””Show No Mercy””Haunting the Chapel””Live Undead””Hell Awaits””Reign in Blood””Reign in Blood””Gold & Platinum – Reign in Blood””Golden Gods Awards Winners”originalet”Kerrang! Hall Of Fame””Slayer Looks Back On 37-Year Career In New Video Series: Part Two””South of Heaven””Gold & Platinum – South of Heaven””Seasons in the Abyss””Gold & Platinum - Seasons in the Abyss””Divine Intervention””Divine Intervention - Release group by Slayer””Gold & Platinum - Divine Intervention””Live Intrusion””Undisputed Attitude””Abolish Government/Superficial Love””Release “Slatanic Slaughter: A Tribute to Slayer” by Various Artists””Diabolus in Musica””Soundtrack to the Apocalypse””God Hates Us All””Systematic - Relationships””War at the Warfield””Gold & Platinum - War at the Warfield””Soundtrack to the Apocalypse””Gold & Platinum - Still Reigning””Metallica, Slayer, Iron Mauden Among Winners At Metal Hammer Awards””Eternal Pyre””Eternal Pyre - Slayer release group””Eternal Pyre””Metal Storm Awards 2006””Kerrang! Hall Of Fame””Slayer Wins 'Best Metal' Grammy Award””Slayer Guitarist Jeff Hanneman Dies””Bullet-For My Valentine booed at Metal Hammer Golden Gods Awards””Unholy Aliance””The End Of Slayer?””Slayer: We Could Thrash Out Two More Albums If We're Fast Enough...””'The Unholy Alliance: Chapter III' UK Dates Added”originalet”Megadeth And Slayer To Co-Headline 'Canadian Carnage' Trek”originalet”World Painted Blood””Release “World Painted Blood” by Slayer””Metallica Heading To Cinemas””Slayer, Megadeth To Join Forces For 'European Carnage' Tour - Dec. 18, 2010”originalet”Slayer's Hanneman Contracts Acute Infection; Band To Bring In Guest Guitarist””Cannibal Corpse's Pat O'Brien Will Step In As Slayer's Guest Guitarist”originalet”Slayer’s Jeff Hanneman Dead at 49””Dave Lombardo Says He Made Only $67,000 In 2011 While Touring With Slayer””Slayer: We Do Not Agree With Dave Lombardo's Substance Or Timeline Of Events””Slayer Welcomes Drummer Paul Bostaph Back To The Fold””Slayer Hope to Unveil Never-Before-Heard Jeff Hanneman Material on Next Album””Slayer Debut New Song 'Implode' During Surprise Golden Gods Appearance””Release group Repentless by Slayer””Repentless - Slayer - Credits””Slayer””Metal Storm Awards 2015””Slayer - to release comic book "Repentless #1"””Slayer To Release 'Repentless' 6.66" Vinyl Box Set””BREAKING NEWS: Slayer Announce Farewell Tour””Slayer Recruit Lamb of God, Anthrax, Behemoth + Testament for Final Tour””Slayer lägger ner efter 37 år””Slayer Announces Second North American Leg Of 'Final' Tour””Final World Tour””Slayer Announces Final European Tour With Lamb of God, Anthrax And Obituary””Slayer To Tour Europe With Lamb of God, Anthrax And Obituary””Slayer To Play 'Last French Show Ever' At Next Year's Hellfst””Slayer's Final World Tour Will Extend Into 2019””Death Angel's Rob Cavestany On Slayer's 'Farewell' Tour: 'Some Of Us Could See This Coming'””Testament Has No Plans To Retire Anytime Soon, Says Chuck Billy””Anthrax's Scott Ian On Slayer's 'Farewell' Tour Plans: 'I Was Surprised And I Wasn't Surprised'””Slayer””Slayer's Morbid Schlock””Review/Rock; For Slayer, the Mania Is the Message””Slayer - Biography””Slayer - Reign In Blood”originalet”Dave Lombardo””An exclusive oral history of Slayer”originalet”Exclusive! Interview With Slayer Guitarist Jeff Hanneman”originalet”Thinking Out Loud: Slayer's Kerry King on hair metal, Satan and being polite””Slayer Lyrics””Slayer - Biography””Most influential artists for extreme metal music””Slayer - Reign in Blood””Slayer guitarist Jeff Hanneman dies aged 49””Slatanic Slaughter: A Tribute to Slayer””Gateway to Hell: A Tribute to Slayer””Covered In Blood””Slayer: The Origins of Thrash in San Francisco, CA.””Why They Rule - #6 Slayer”originalet”Guitar World's 100 Greatest Heavy Metal Guitarists Of All Time”originalet”The fans have spoken: Slayer comes out on top in readers' polls”originalet”Tribute to Jeff Hanneman (1964-2013)””Lamb Of God Frontman: We Sound Like A Slayer Rip-Off””BEHEMOTH Frontman Pays Tribute To SLAYER's JEFF HANNEMAN””Slayer, Hatebreed Doing Double Duty On This Year's Ozzfest””System of a Down””Lacuna Coil’s Andrea Ferro Talks Influences, Skateboarding, Band Origins + More””Slayer - Reign in Blood””Into The Lungs of Hell””Slayer rules - en utställning om fans””Slayer and Their Fans Slashed Through a No-Holds-Barred Night at Gas Monkey””Home””Slayer””Gold & Platinum - The Big 4 Live from Sofia, Bulgaria””Exclusive! Interview With Slayer Guitarist Kerry King””2008-02-23: Wiltern, Los Angeles, CA, USA””Slayer's Kerry King To Perform With Megadeth Tonight! - Oct. 21, 2010”originalet”Dave Lombardo - Biography”Slayer Case DismissedArkiveradUltimate Classic Rock: Slayer guitarist Jeff Hanneman dead at 49.”Slayer: "We could never do any thing like Some Kind Of Monster..."””Cannibal Corpse'S Pat O'Brien Will Step In As Slayer'S Guest Guitarist | The Official Slayer Site”originalet”Slayer Wins 'Best Metal' Grammy Award””Slayer Guitarist Jeff Hanneman Dies””Kerrang! Awards 2006 Blog: Kerrang! Hall Of Fame””Kerrang! Awards 2013: Kerrang! Legend”originalet”Metallica, Slayer, Iron Maien Among Winners At Metal Hammer Awards””Metal Hammer Golden Gods Awards””Bullet For My Valentine Booed At Metal Hammer Golden Gods Awards””Metal Storm Awards 2006””Metal Storm Awards 2015””Slayer's Concert History””Slayer - Relationships””Slayer - Releases”Slayers officiella webbplatsSlayer på MusicBrainzOfficiell webbplatsSlayerSlayerr1373445760000 0001 1540 47353068615-5086262726cb13906545x(data)6033143kn20030215029