Shortening a title without changing its meaning












4















Essentially, I want to change:




Managing a lot of people is a very difficult problem




to:



Lot of people, difficult problem



I understand that when you shorten a title, it will become more vague, but sometimes, I feel like when you shorten it too much the meaning becomes too uncertain or difficult to guess, is there a consensus on how to do this properly or perhaps a widespread practice on how to do this properly, that I am not aware of?










share|improve this question







New contributor




tefisjb is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
















  • 14





    Why waste time say lot word when few word do trick?

    – Azor Ahai
    Apr 1 at 17:17






  • 1





    "Managing large teams: problems and solutions"

    – David Rice
    Apr 1 at 20:18











  • @AzorAhai The people of SE have got to be the most intelligent commenters on the entire internet. Every time I see some intellectual joke comment with like 10 upvotes, I smile.

    – user45266
    Apr 2 at 5:09






  • 2





    Managing many is difficult

    – mcalex
    Apr 2 at 7:50











  • @user you must have read a different comment then

    – Azor Ahai
    Apr 2 at 15:03
















4















Essentially, I want to change:




Managing a lot of people is a very difficult problem




to:



Lot of people, difficult problem



I understand that when you shorten a title, it will become more vague, but sometimes, I feel like when you shorten it too much the meaning becomes too uncertain or difficult to guess, is there a consensus on how to do this properly or perhaps a widespread practice on how to do this properly, that I am not aware of?










share|improve this question







New contributor




tefisjb is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
















  • 14





    Why waste time say lot word when few word do trick?

    – Azor Ahai
    Apr 1 at 17:17






  • 1





    "Managing large teams: problems and solutions"

    – David Rice
    Apr 1 at 20:18











  • @AzorAhai The people of SE have got to be the most intelligent commenters on the entire internet. Every time I see some intellectual joke comment with like 10 upvotes, I smile.

    – user45266
    Apr 2 at 5:09






  • 2





    Managing many is difficult

    – mcalex
    Apr 2 at 7:50











  • @user you must have read a different comment then

    – Azor Ahai
    Apr 2 at 15:03














4












4








4


1






Essentially, I want to change:




Managing a lot of people is a very difficult problem




to:



Lot of people, difficult problem



I understand that when you shorten a title, it will become more vague, but sometimes, I feel like when you shorten it too much the meaning becomes too uncertain or difficult to guess, is there a consensus on how to do this properly or perhaps a widespread practice on how to do this properly, that I am not aware of?










share|improve this question







New contributor




tefisjb is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.












Essentially, I want to change:




Managing a lot of people is a very difficult problem




to:



Lot of people, difficult problem



I understand that when you shorten a title, it will become more vague, but sometimes, I feel like when you shorten it too much the meaning becomes too uncertain or difficult to guess, is there a consensus on how to do this properly or perhaps a widespread practice on how to do this properly, that I am not aware of?







technical-writing titles






share|improve this question







New contributor




tefisjb is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











share|improve this question







New contributor




tefisjb is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









share|improve this question




share|improve this question






New contributor




tefisjb is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









asked Apr 1 at 13:54









tefisjbtefisjb

233




233




New contributor




tefisjb is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.





New contributor





tefisjb is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






tefisjb is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.








  • 14





    Why waste time say lot word when few word do trick?

    – Azor Ahai
    Apr 1 at 17:17






  • 1





    "Managing large teams: problems and solutions"

    – David Rice
    Apr 1 at 20:18











  • @AzorAhai The people of SE have got to be the most intelligent commenters on the entire internet. Every time I see some intellectual joke comment with like 10 upvotes, I smile.

    – user45266
    Apr 2 at 5:09






  • 2





    Managing many is difficult

    – mcalex
    Apr 2 at 7:50











  • @user you must have read a different comment then

    – Azor Ahai
    Apr 2 at 15:03














  • 14





    Why waste time say lot word when few word do trick?

    – Azor Ahai
    Apr 1 at 17:17






  • 1





    "Managing large teams: problems and solutions"

    – David Rice
    Apr 1 at 20:18











  • @AzorAhai The people of SE have got to be the most intelligent commenters on the entire internet. Every time I see some intellectual joke comment with like 10 upvotes, I smile.

    – user45266
    Apr 2 at 5:09






  • 2





    Managing many is difficult

    – mcalex
    Apr 2 at 7:50











  • @user you must have read a different comment then

    – Azor Ahai
    Apr 2 at 15:03








14




14





Why waste time say lot word when few word do trick?

– Azor Ahai
Apr 1 at 17:17





Why waste time say lot word when few word do trick?

– Azor Ahai
Apr 1 at 17:17




1




1





"Managing large teams: problems and solutions"

– David Rice
Apr 1 at 20:18





"Managing large teams: problems and solutions"

– David Rice
Apr 1 at 20:18













@AzorAhai The people of SE have got to be the most intelligent commenters on the entire internet. Every time I see some intellectual joke comment with like 10 upvotes, I smile.

– user45266
Apr 2 at 5:09





@AzorAhai The people of SE have got to be the most intelligent commenters on the entire internet. Every time I see some intellectual joke comment with like 10 upvotes, I smile.

– user45266
Apr 2 at 5:09




2




2





Managing many is difficult

– mcalex
Apr 2 at 7:50





Managing many is difficult

– mcalex
Apr 2 at 7:50













@user you must have read a different comment then

– Azor Ahai
Apr 2 at 15:03





@user you must have read a different comment then

– Azor Ahai
Apr 2 at 15:03










5 Answers
5






active

oldest

votes


















12














It's fine to shorten but only when the reader can fill in the blank.



So far, you have:




Managing a lot of people is a very difficult problem
to
Lot of
people, difficult problem




In this example, you have 3 concepts:




  1. It's about managing people

  2. There are a lot of people

  3. It's hard


The most important of these is the first, that your article is about management. Yet it's the one you dropped in your title revision. "Lot of people, difficult problem" can be about anything. Even if you know from context it's about a workplace (and not about, say, overpopulation), it could be about noise levels or fitting in enough desks/cubicles or the fact that you don't have enough bathrooms. All those can be legit articles about work.



I would drop the third concept, that it's hard. Because that is implied by the fact that you are dedicating an entire article to it.



This leaves you with:




Managing a lot of people




It's a boring title, but it's got all 3 concepts in it (the 3rd is implied). And it's half the length of the old one.



I'll leave it to you to make the title more interesting, and more focused (since you're presumably not covering everything about managing multiple people), because the job of Writing.SE isn't to rewrite for you. Instead, it's to help you work through it.



What are the concepts you are trying to convey? Which are the most vital? Which can be dropped because they're implied? Which can be dropped because they're unnecessary in the title?






share|improve this answer































    7














    How about... "Crowd Management Challenges"



    Where "Crowd" encapsulates "lot of people"
    and "Challenges" implies "is a difficult problem".






    share|improve this answer



















    • 1





      "Crowd" needs to be replaced; it implies the public, and disorganisation. Perhaps "mass" instead? (Not sure whether this is any better.)

      – wizzwizz4
      Apr 1 at 18:29






    • 4





      crowd management is a real field of work/research that I think is unrelated to what OP is actually talking about.

      – Alexandre Aubrey
      Apr 1 at 19:23



















    6














    Management Difficulties Scale with Headcount



    Titles follow the same rule as billboard advertisements: no more than 7 words; no matter what their size. Scientifically speaking, billboard comprehension rates drop off a cliff after 7 words.



    Apply the same rule to your titles.






    share|improve this answer































      5














      Your first title is a complete sentence, which is unusual. Your second title completely drops the concept of management.



      Ask yourself what the core of the title is and use that. If it were me, I might distill it down to Management Difficulties or Problems in Management.



      You can also add a subtitle if the main title is not enough. Management Difficulties: Effects of Larger Staff.



      Your second title could apply to any gathering of people, including the audience at a rock concert. It could be about overpopulation and the problems caused by that.



      Titles need not be grammatically correct. They should be clear or, in fiction, evocative.



      Find some combination that properly conveys to the reader that you will discuss the difficulties caused by managing many people rather than a few.






      share|improve this answer































        1














        I'd go with something short and to the point, like Challenges of managing people.



        I'm not sure about putting The in front of Challenges, but I think it basically says all you want.






        share|improve this answer










        New contributor




        ChatterOne is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
        Check out our Code of Conduct.





















          Your Answer








          StackExchange.ready(function() {
          var channelOptions = {
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "166"
          };
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
          createEditor();
          });
          }
          else {
          createEditor();
          }
          });

          function createEditor() {
          StackExchange.prepareEditor({
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: false,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: null,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader: {
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          },
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          });


          }
          });






          tefisjb is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.










          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fwriting.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f44248%2fshortening-a-title-without-changing-its-meaning%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          5 Answers
          5






          active

          oldest

          votes








          5 Answers
          5






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes









          12














          It's fine to shorten but only when the reader can fill in the blank.



          So far, you have:




          Managing a lot of people is a very difficult problem
          to
          Lot of
          people, difficult problem




          In this example, you have 3 concepts:




          1. It's about managing people

          2. There are a lot of people

          3. It's hard


          The most important of these is the first, that your article is about management. Yet it's the one you dropped in your title revision. "Lot of people, difficult problem" can be about anything. Even if you know from context it's about a workplace (and not about, say, overpopulation), it could be about noise levels or fitting in enough desks/cubicles or the fact that you don't have enough bathrooms. All those can be legit articles about work.



          I would drop the third concept, that it's hard. Because that is implied by the fact that you are dedicating an entire article to it.



          This leaves you with:




          Managing a lot of people




          It's a boring title, but it's got all 3 concepts in it (the 3rd is implied). And it's half the length of the old one.



          I'll leave it to you to make the title more interesting, and more focused (since you're presumably not covering everything about managing multiple people), because the job of Writing.SE isn't to rewrite for you. Instead, it's to help you work through it.



          What are the concepts you are trying to convey? Which are the most vital? Which can be dropped because they're implied? Which can be dropped because they're unnecessary in the title?






          share|improve this answer




























            12














            It's fine to shorten but only when the reader can fill in the blank.



            So far, you have:




            Managing a lot of people is a very difficult problem
            to
            Lot of
            people, difficult problem




            In this example, you have 3 concepts:




            1. It's about managing people

            2. There are a lot of people

            3. It's hard


            The most important of these is the first, that your article is about management. Yet it's the one you dropped in your title revision. "Lot of people, difficult problem" can be about anything. Even if you know from context it's about a workplace (and not about, say, overpopulation), it could be about noise levels or fitting in enough desks/cubicles or the fact that you don't have enough bathrooms. All those can be legit articles about work.



            I would drop the third concept, that it's hard. Because that is implied by the fact that you are dedicating an entire article to it.



            This leaves you with:




            Managing a lot of people




            It's a boring title, but it's got all 3 concepts in it (the 3rd is implied). And it's half the length of the old one.



            I'll leave it to you to make the title more interesting, and more focused (since you're presumably not covering everything about managing multiple people), because the job of Writing.SE isn't to rewrite for you. Instead, it's to help you work through it.



            What are the concepts you are trying to convey? Which are the most vital? Which can be dropped because they're implied? Which can be dropped because they're unnecessary in the title?






            share|improve this answer


























              12












              12








              12







              It's fine to shorten but only when the reader can fill in the blank.



              So far, you have:




              Managing a lot of people is a very difficult problem
              to
              Lot of
              people, difficult problem




              In this example, you have 3 concepts:




              1. It's about managing people

              2. There are a lot of people

              3. It's hard


              The most important of these is the first, that your article is about management. Yet it's the one you dropped in your title revision. "Lot of people, difficult problem" can be about anything. Even if you know from context it's about a workplace (and not about, say, overpopulation), it could be about noise levels or fitting in enough desks/cubicles or the fact that you don't have enough bathrooms. All those can be legit articles about work.



              I would drop the third concept, that it's hard. Because that is implied by the fact that you are dedicating an entire article to it.



              This leaves you with:




              Managing a lot of people




              It's a boring title, but it's got all 3 concepts in it (the 3rd is implied). And it's half the length of the old one.



              I'll leave it to you to make the title more interesting, and more focused (since you're presumably not covering everything about managing multiple people), because the job of Writing.SE isn't to rewrite for you. Instead, it's to help you work through it.



              What are the concepts you are trying to convey? Which are the most vital? Which can be dropped because they're implied? Which can be dropped because they're unnecessary in the title?






              share|improve this answer













              It's fine to shorten but only when the reader can fill in the blank.



              So far, you have:




              Managing a lot of people is a very difficult problem
              to
              Lot of
              people, difficult problem




              In this example, you have 3 concepts:




              1. It's about managing people

              2. There are a lot of people

              3. It's hard


              The most important of these is the first, that your article is about management. Yet it's the one you dropped in your title revision. "Lot of people, difficult problem" can be about anything. Even if you know from context it's about a workplace (and not about, say, overpopulation), it could be about noise levels or fitting in enough desks/cubicles or the fact that you don't have enough bathrooms. All those can be legit articles about work.



              I would drop the third concept, that it's hard. Because that is implied by the fact that you are dedicating an entire article to it.



              This leaves you with:




              Managing a lot of people




              It's a boring title, but it's got all 3 concepts in it (the 3rd is implied). And it's half the length of the old one.



              I'll leave it to you to make the title more interesting, and more focused (since you're presumably not covering everything about managing multiple people), because the job of Writing.SE isn't to rewrite for you. Instead, it's to help you work through it.



              What are the concepts you are trying to convey? Which are the most vital? Which can be dropped because they're implied? Which can be dropped because they're unnecessary in the title?







              share|improve this answer












              share|improve this answer



              share|improve this answer










              answered Apr 1 at 15:19









              CynCyn

              17.6k13783




              17.6k13783























                  7














                  How about... "Crowd Management Challenges"



                  Where "Crowd" encapsulates "lot of people"
                  and "Challenges" implies "is a difficult problem".






                  share|improve this answer



















                  • 1





                    "Crowd" needs to be replaced; it implies the public, and disorganisation. Perhaps "mass" instead? (Not sure whether this is any better.)

                    – wizzwizz4
                    Apr 1 at 18:29






                  • 4





                    crowd management is a real field of work/research that I think is unrelated to what OP is actually talking about.

                    – Alexandre Aubrey
                    Apr 1 at 19:23
















                  7














                  How about... "Crowd Management Challenges"



                  Where "Crowd" encapsulates "lot of people"
                  and "Challenges" implies "is a difficult problem".






                  share|improve this answer



















                  • 1





                    "Crowd" needs to be replaced; it implies the public, and disorganisation. Perhaps "mass" instead? (Not sure whether this is any better.)

                    – wizzwizz4
                    Apr 1 at 18:29






                  • 4





                    crowd management is a real field of work/research that I think is unrelated to what OP is actually talking about.

                    – Alexandre Aubrey
                    Apr 1 at 19:23














                  7












                  7








                  7







                  How about... "Crowd Management Challenges"



                  Where "Crowd" encapsulates "lot of people"
                  and "Challenges" implies "is a difficult problem".






                  share|improve this answer













                  How about... "Crowd Management Challenges"



                  Where "Crowd" encapsulates "lot of people"
                  and "Challenges" implies "is a difficult problem".







                  share|improve this answer












                  share|improve this answer



                  share|improve this answer










                  answered Apr 1 at 14:57









                  Henry TaylorHenry Taylor

                  9,5661732




                  9,5661732








                  • 1





                    "Crowd" needs to be replaced; it implies the public, and disorganisation. Perhaps "mass" instead? (Not sure whether this is any better.)

                    – wizzwizz4
                    Apr 1 at 18:29






                  • 4





                    crowd management is a real field of work/research that I think is unrelated to what OP is actually talking about.

                    – Alexandre Aubrey
                    Apr 1 at 19:23














                  • 1





                    "Crowd" needs to be replaced; it implies the public, and disorganisation. Perhaps "mass" instead? (Not sure whether this is any better.)

                    – wizzwizz4
                    Apr 1 at 18:29






                  • 4





                    crowd management is a real field of work/research that I think is unrelated to what OP is actually talking about.

                    – Alexandre Aubrey
                    Apr 1 at 19:23








                  1




                  1





                  "Crowd" needs to be replaced; it implies the public, and disorganisation. Perhaps "mass" instead? (Not sure whether this is any better.)

                  – wizzwizz4
                  Apr 1 at 18:29





                  "Crowd" needs to be replaced; it implies the public, and disorganisation. Perhaps "mass" instead? (Not sure whether this is any better.)

                  – wizzwizz4
                  Apr 1 at 18:29




                  4




                  4





                  crowd management is a real field of work/research that I think is unrelated to what OP is actually talking about.

                  – Alexandre Aubrey
                  Apr 1 at 19:23





                  crowd management is a real field of work/research that I think is unrelated to what OP is actually talking about.

                  – Alexandre Aubrey
                  Apr 1 at 19:23











                  6














                  Management Difficulties Scale with Headcount



                  Titles follow the same rule as billboard advertisements: no more than 7 words; no matter what their size. Scientifically speaking, billboard comprehension rates drop off a cliff after 7 words.



                  Apply the same rule to your titles.






                  share|improve this answer




























                    6














                    Management Difficulties Scale with Headcount



                    Titles follow the same rule as billboard advertisements: no more than 7 words; no matter what their size. Scientifically speaking, billboard comprehension rates drop off a cliff after 7 words.



                    Apply the same rule to your titles.






                    share|improve this answer


























                      6












                      6








                      6







                      Management Difficulties Scale with Headcount



                      Titles follow the same rule as billboard advertisements: no more than 7 words; no matter what their size. Scientifically speaking, billboard comprehension rates drop off a cliff after 7 words.



                      Apply the same rule to your titles.






                      share|improve this answer













                      Management Difficulties Scale with Headcount



                      Titles follow the same rule as billboard advertisements: no more than 7 words; no matter what their size. Scientifically speaking, billboard comprehension rates drop off a cliff after 7 words.



                      Apply the same rule to your titles.







                      share|improve this answer












                      share|improve this answer



                      share|improve this answer










                      answered Apr 1 at 15:07









                      AmadeusAmadeus

                      58.2k574186




                      58.2k574186























                          5














                          Your first title is a complete sentence, which is unusual. Your second title completely drops the concept of management.



                          Ask yourself what the core of the title is and use that. If it were me, I might distill it down to Management Difficulties or Problems in Management.



                          You can also add a subtitle if the main title is not enough. Management Difficulties: Effects of Larger Staff.



                          Your second title could apply to any gathering of people, including the audience at a rock concert. It could be about overpopulation and the problems caused by that.



                          Titles need not be grammatically correct. They should be clear or, in fiction, evocative.



                          Find some combination that properly conveys to the reader that you will discuss the difficulties caused by managing many people rather than a few.






                          share|improve this answer




























                            5














                            Your first title is a complete sentence, which is unusual. Your second title completely drops the concept of management.



                            Ask yourself what the core of the title is and use that. If it were me, I might distill it down to Management Difficulties or Problems in Management.



                            You can also add a subtitle if the main title is not enough. Management Difficulties: Effects of Larger Staff.



                            Your second title could apply to any gathering of people, including the audience at a rock concert. It could be about overpopulation and the problems caused by that.



                            Titles need not be grammatically correct. They should be clear or, in fiction, evocative.



                            Find some combination that properly conveys to the reader that you will discuss the difficulties caused by managing many people rather than a few.






                            share|improve this answer


























                              5












                              5








                              5







                              Your first title is a complete sentence, which is unusual. Your second title completely drops the concept of management.



                              Ask yourself what the core of the title is and use that. If it were me, I might distill it down to Management Difficulties or Problems in Management.



                              You can also add a subtitle if the main title is not enough. Management Difficulties: Effects of Larger Staff.



                              Your second title could apply to any gathering of people, including the audience at a rock concert. It could be about overpopulation and the problems caused by that.



                              Titles need not be grammatically correct. They should be clear or, in fiction, evocative.



                              Find some combination that properly conveys to the reader that you will discuss the difficulties caused by managing many people rather than a few.






                              share|improve this answer













                              Your first title is a complete sentence, which is unusual. Your second title completely drops the concept of management.



                              Ask yourself what the core of the title is and use that. If it were me, I might distill it down to Management Difficulties or Problems in Management.



                              You can also add a subtitle if the main title is not enough. Management Difficulties: Effects of Larger Staff.



                              Your second title could apply to any gathering of people, including the audience at a rock concert. It could be about overpopulation and the problems caused by that.



                              Titles need not be grammatically correct. They should be clear or, in fiction, evocative.



                              Find some combination that properly conveys to the reader that you will discuss the difficulties caused by managing many people rather than a few.







                              share|improve this answer












                              share|improve this answer



                              share|improve this answer










                              answered Apr 1 at 14:39









                              RasdashanRasdashan

                              9,6481160




                              9,6481160























                                  1














                                  I'd go with something short and to the point, like Challenges of managing people.



                                  I'm not sure about putting The in front of Challenges, but I think it basically says all you want.






                                  share|improve this answer










                                  New contributor




                                  ChatterOne is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                                  Check out our Code of Conduct.

























                                    1














                                    I'd go with something short and to the point, like Challenges of managing people.



                                    I'm not sure about putting The in front of Challenges, but I think it basically says all you want.






                                    share|improve this answer










                                    New contributor




                                    ChatterOne is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                                    Check out our Code of Conduct.























                                      1












                                      1








                                      1







                                      I'd go with something short and to the point, like Challenges of managing people.



                                      I'm not sure about putting The in front of Challenges, but I think it basically says all you want.






                                      share|improve this answer










                                      New contributor




                                      ChatterOne is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                                      Check out our Code of Conduct.










                                      I'd go with something short and to the point, like Challenges of managing people.



                                      I'm not sure about putting The in front of Challenges, but I think it basically says all you want.







                                      share|improve this answer










                                      New contributor




                                      ChatterOne is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                                      Check out our Code of Conduct.









                                      share|improve this answer



                                      share|improve this answer








                                      edited Apr 2 at 11:24









                                      Chenmunka

                                      6991319




                                      6991319






                                      New contributor




                                      ChatterOne is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                                      Check out our Code of Conduct.









                                      answered Apr 2 at 9:39









                                      ChatterOneChatterOne

                                      1114




                                      1114




                                      New contributor




                                      ChatterOne is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                                      Check out our Code of Conduct.





                                      New contributor





                                      ChatterOne is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                                      Check out our Code of Conduct.






                                      ChatterOne is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                                      Check out our Code of Conduct.






















                                          tefisjb is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.










                                          draft saved

                                          draft discarded


















                                          tefisjb is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.













                                          tefisjb is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.












                                          tefisjb is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
















                                          Thanks for contributing an answer to Writing Stack Exchange!


                                          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                                          But avoid



                                          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                                          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                                          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                                          draft saved


                                          draft discarded














                                          StackExchange.ready(
                                          function () {
                                          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fwriting.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f44248%2fshortening-a-title-without-changing-its-meaning%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                                          }
                                          );

                                          Post as a guest















                                          Required, but never shown





















































                                          Required, but never shown














                                          Required, but never shown












                                          Required, but never shown







                                          Required, but never shown

































                                          Required, but never shown














                                          Required, but never shown












                                          Required, but never shown







                                          Required, but never shown







                                          Popular posts from this blog

                                          Bruad Bilen | Luke uk diar | NawigatsjuunCommonskategorii: BruadCommonskategorii: RunstükenWikiquote: Bruad

                                          What is the offset in a seaplane's hull?

                                          Slayer Innehåll Historia | Stil, komposition och lyrik | Bandets betydelse och framgångar | Sidoprojekt och samarbeten | Kontroverser | Medlemmar | Utmärkelser och nomineringar | Turnéer och festivaler | Diskografi | Referenser | Externa länkar | Navigeringsmenywww.slayer.net”Metal Massacre vol. 1””Metal Massacre vol. 3””Metal Massacre Volume III””Show No Mercy””Haunting the Chapel””Live Undead””Hell Awaits””Reign in Blood””Reign in Blood””Gold & Platinum – Reign in Blood””Golden Gods Awards Winners”originalet”Kerrang! Hall Of Fame””Slayer Looks Back On 37-Year Career In New Video Series: Part Two””South of Heaven””Gold & Platinum – South of Heaven””Seasons in the Abyss””Gold & Platinum - Seasons in the Abyss””Divine Intervention””Divine Intervention - Release group by Slayer””Gold & Platinum - Divine Intervention””Live Intrusion””Undisputed Attitude””Abolish Government/Superficial Love””Release “Slatanic Slaughter: A Tribute to Slayer” by Various Artists””Diabolus in Musica””Soundtrack to the Apocalypse””God Hates Us All””Systematic - Relationships””War at the Warfield””Gold & Platinum - War at the Warfield””Soundtrack to the Apocalypse””Gold & Platinum - Still Reigning””Metallica, Slayer, Iron Mauden Among Winners At Metal Hammer Awards””Eternal Pyre””Eternal Pyre - Slayer release group””Eternal Pyre””Metal Storm Awards 2006””Kerrang! Hall Of Fame””Slayer Wins 'Best Metal' Grammy Award””Slayer Guitarist Jeff Hanneman Dies””Bullet-For My Valentine booed at Metal Hammer Golden Gods Awards””Unholy Aliance””The End Of Slayer?””Slayer: We Could Thrash Out Two More Albums If We're Fast Enough...””'The Unholy Alliance: Chapter III' UK Dates Added”originalet”Megadeth And Slayer To Co-Headline 'Canadian Carnage' Trek”originalet”World Painted Blood””Release “World Painted Blood” by Slayer””Metallica Heading To Cinemas””Slayer, Megadeth To Join Forces For 'European Carnage' Tour - Dec. 18, 2010”originalet”Slayer's Hanneman Contracts Acute Infection; Band To Bring In Guest Guitarist””Cannibal Corpse's Pat O'Brien Will Step In As Slayer's Guest Guitarist”originalet”Slayer’s Jeff Hanneman Dead at 49””Dave Lombardo Says He Made Only $67,000 In 2011 While Touring With Slayer””Slayer: We Do Not Agree With Dave Lombardo's Substance Or Timeline Of Events””Slayer Welcomes Drummer Paul Bostaph Back To The Fold””Slayer Hope to Unveil Never-Before-Heard Jeff Hanneman Material on Next Album””Slayer Debut New Song 'Implode' During Surprise Golden Gods Appearance””Release group Repentless by Slayer””Repentless - Slayer - Credits””Slayer””Metal Storm Awards 2015””Slayer - to release comic book "Repentless #1"””Slayer To Release 'Repentless' 6.66" Vinyl Box Set””BREAKING NEWS: Slayer Announce Farewell Tour””Slayer Recruit Lamb of God, Anthrax, Behemoth + Testament for Final Tour””Slayer lägger ner efter 37 år””Slayer Announces Second North American Leg Of 'Final' Tour””Final World Tour””Slayer Announces Final European Tour With Lamb of God, Anthrax And Obituary””Slayer To Tour Europe With Lamb of God, Anthrax And Obituary””Slayer To Play 'Last French Show Ever' At Next Year's Hellfst””Slayer's Final World Tour Will Extend Into 2019””Death Angel's Rob Cavestany On Slayer's 'Farewell' Tour: 'Some Of Us Could See This Coming'””Testament Has No Plans To Retire Anytime Soon, Says Chuck Billy””Anthrax's Scott Ian On Slayer's 'Farewell' Tour Plans: 'I Was Surprised And I Wasn't Surprised'””Slayer””Slayer's Morbid Schlock””Review/Rock; For Slayer, the Mania Is the Message””Slayer - Biography””Slayer - Reign In Blood”originalet”Dave Lombardo””An exclusive oral history of Slayer”originalet”Exclusive! Interview With Slayer Guitarist Jeff Hanneman”originalet”Thinking Out Loud: Slayer's Kerry King on hair metal, Satan and being polite””Slayer Lyrics””Slayer - Biography””Most influential artists for extreme metal music””Slayer - Reign in Blood””Slayer guitarist Jeff Hanneman dies aged 49””Slatanic Slaughter: A Tribute to Slayer””Gateway to Hell: A Tribute to Slayer””Covered In Blood””Slayer: The Origins of Thrash in San Francisco, CA.””Why They Rule - #6 Slayer”originalet”Guitar World's 100 Greatest Heavy Metal Guitarists Of All Time”originalet”The fans have spoken: Slayer comes out on top in readers' polls”originalet”Tribute to Jeff Hanneman (1964-2013)””Lamb Of God Frontman: We Sound Like A Slayer Rip-Off””BEHEMOTH Frontman Pays Tribute To SLAYER's JEFF HANNEMAN””Slayer, Hatebreed Doing Double Duty On This Year's Ozzfest””System of a Down””Lacuna Coil’s Andrea Ferro Talks Influences, Skateboarding, Band Origins + More””Slayer - Reign in Blood””Into The Lungs of Hell””Slayer rules - en utställning om fans””Slayer and Their Fans Slashed Through a No-Holds-Barred Night at Gas Monkey””Home””Slayer””Gold & Platinum - The Big 4 Live from Sofia, Bulgaria””Exclusive! Interview With Slayer Guitarist Kerry King””2008-02-23: Wiltern, Los Angeles, CA, USA””Slayer's Kerry King To Perform With Megadeth Tonight! - Oct. 21, 2010”originalet”Dave Lombardo - Biography”Slayer Case DismissedArkiveradUltimate Classic Rock: Slayer guitarist Jeff Hanneman dead at 49.”Slayer: "We could never do any thing like Some Kind Of Monster..."””Cannibal Corpse'S Pat O'Brien Will Step In As Slayer'S Guest Guitarist | The Official Slayer Site”originalet”Slayer Wins 'Best Metal' Grammy Award””Slayer Guitarist Jeff Hanneman Dies””Kerrang! Awards 2006 Blog: Kerrang! Hall Of Fame””Kerrang! Awards 2013: Kerrang! Legend”originalet”Metallica, Slayer, Iron Maien Among Winners At Metal Hammer Awards””Metal Hammer Golden Gods Awards””Bullet For My Valentine Booed At Metal Hammer Golden Gods Awards””Metal Storm Awards 2006””Metal Storm Awards 2015””Slayer's Concert History””Slayer - Relationships””Slayer - Releases”Slayers officiella webbplatsSlayer på MusicBrainzOfficiell webbplatsSlayerSlayerr1373445760000 0001 1540 47353068615-5086262726cb13906545x(data)6033143kn20030215029