Tenured professor’s husband convicted of a drugs-trafficking felony – are there any career implications?...












1















At the university I work at in the US, a tenured professor’s husband has been convicted of drugs trafficking. Would there be any likely (career) implications for the professor?



Obviously, their personal life will be affected, but is it likely to have implications otherwise?










share|improve this question















put on hold as off-topic by corey979, Dmitry Savostyanov, Bryan Krause, user3209815, Dmitry Grigoryev yesterday


This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:


  • "This question is not within the scope of this site as defined in the help center. Our scope particularly excludes the content of research, education outside of a university setting, and undergraduate admissions, life, and culture." – corey979, Dmitry Savostyanov, Bryan Krause, user3209815, Dmitry Grigoryev

If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.












  • 9





    What does this have to do with academia? Is this boat programming? meta.stackexchange.com/questions/14470/…

    – Anonymous Physicist
    yesterday






  • 3





    I'm not sure I understand the boat programming reference, but the question is definitely about academia. The question is asking whether there would be career consequences for a professor whose husband had been convicted of a felony. If the Professor herself had been convicted, I think the answer would be clear. In this case, the connection between the felony and the professor is less direct. However, the nature of the crime (compared to say, assaulting someone) makes the link a little stronger than it might otherwise be

    – user1778351
    yesterday






  • 1





    you are innocent until proven guilty, so a "somewhat stronger link to a felony" still equals innocent.

    – Maarten Buis
    yesterday






  • 5





    I'll note that drug laws in the US are insane. People get charged with "drug trafficking felonies" when they are nothing more than addicts sharing drugs with friends. The jails/prisons are full of such people.

    – Buffy
    yesterday






  • 2





    Your ‘assumption’ is a baseless accusation wrapped up to look pretty.

    – Jon Custer
    yesterday
















1















At the university I work at in the US, a tenured professor’s husband has been convicted of drugs trafficking. Would there be any likely (career) implications for the professor?



Obviously, their personal life will be affected, but is it likely to have implications otherwise?










share|improve this question















put on hold as off-topic by corey979, Dmitry Savostyanov, Bryan Krause, user3209815, Dmitry Grigoryev yesterday


This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:


  • "This question is not within the scope of this site as defined in the help center. Our scope particularly excludes the content of research, education outside of a university setting, and undergraduate admissions, life, and culture." – corey979, Dmitry Savostyanov, Bryan Krause, user3209815, Dmitry Grigoryev

If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.












  • 9





    What does this have to do with academia? Is this boat programming? meta.stackexchange.com/questions/14470/…

    – Anonymous Physicist
    yesterday






  • 3





    I'm not sure I understand the boat programming reference, but the question is definitely about academia. The question is asking whether there would be career consequences for a professor whose husband had been convicted of a felony. If the Professor herself had been convicted, I think the answer would be clear. In this case, the connection between the felony and the professor is less direct. However, the nature of the crime (compared to say, assaulting someone) makes the link a little stronger than it might otherwise be

    – user1778351
    yesterday






  • 1





    you are innocent until proven guilty, so a "somewhat stronger link to a felony" still equals innocent.

    – Maarten Buis
    yesterday






  • 5





    I'll note that drug laws in the US are insane. People get charged with "drug trafficking felonies" when they are nothing more than addicts sharing drugs with friends. The jails/prisons are full of such people.

    – Buffy
    yesterday






  • 2





    Your ‘assumption’ is a baseless accusation wrapped up to look pretty.

    – Jon Custer
    yesterday














1












1








1








At the university I work at in the US, a tenured professor’s husband has been convicted of drugs trafficking. Would there be any likely (career) implications for the professor?



Obviously, their personal life will be affected, but is it likely to have implications otherwise?










share|improve this question
















At the university I work at in the US, a tenured professor’s husband has been convicted of drugs trafficking. Would there be any likely (career) implications for the professor?



Obviously, their personal life will be affected, but is it likely to have implications otherwise?







united-states professors drugs






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited yesterday







user1778351

















asked yesterday









user1778351user1778351

12529




12529




put on hold as off-topic by corey979, Dmitry Savostyanov, Bryan Krause, user3209815, Dmitry Grigoryev yesterday


This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:


  • "This question is not within the scope of this site as defined in the help center. Our scope particularly excludes the content of research, education outside of a university setting, and undergraduate admissions, life, and culture." – corey979, Dmitry Savostyanov, Bryan Krause, user3209815, Dmitry Grigoryev

If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.







put on hold as off-topic by corey979, Dmitry Savostyanov, Bryan Krause, user3209815, Dmitry Grigoryev yesterday


This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:


  • "This question is not within the scope of this site as defined in the help center. Our scope particularly excludes the content of research, education outside of a university setting, and undergraduate admissions, life, and culture." – corey979, Dmitry Savostyanov, Bryan Krause, user3209815, Dmitry Grigoryev

If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.








  • 9





    What does this have to do with academia? Is this boat programming? meta.stackexchange.com/questions/14470/…

    – Anonymous Physicist
    yesterday






  • 3





    I'm not sure I understand the boat programming reference, but the question is definitely about academia. The question is asking whether there would be career consequences for a professor whose husband had been convicted of a felony. If the Professor herself had been convicted, I think the answer would be clear. In this case, the connection between the felony and the professor is less direct. However, the nature of the crime (compared to say, assaulting someone) makes the link a little stronger than it might otherwise be

    – user1778351
    yesterday






  • 1





    you are innocent until proven guilty, so a "somewhat stronger link to a felony" still equals innocent.

    – Maarten Buis
    yesterday






  • 5





    I'll note that drug laws in the US are insane. People get charged with "drug trafficking felonies" when they are nothing more than addicts sharing drugs with friends. The jails/prisons are full of such people.

    – Buffy
    yesterday






  • 2





    Your ‘assumption’ is a baseless accusation wrapped up to look pretty.

    – Jon Custer
    yesterday














  • 9





    What does this have to do with academia? Is this boat programming? meta.stackexchange.com/questions/14470/…

    – Anonymous Physicist
    yesterday






  • 3





    I'm not sure I understand the boat programming reference, but the question is definitely about academia. The question is asking whether there would be career consequences for a professor whose husband had been convicted of a felony. If the Professor herself had been convicted, I think the answer would be clear. In this case, the connection between the felony and the professor is less direct. However, the nature of the crime (compared to say, assaulting someone) makes the link a little stronger than it might otherwise be

    – user1778351
    yesterday






  • 1





    you are innocent until proven guilty, so a "somewhat stronger link to a felony" still equals innocent.

    – Maarten Buis
    yesterday






  • 5





    I'll note that drug laws in the US are insane. People get charged with "drug trafficking felonies" when they are nothing more than addicts sharing drugs with friends. The jails/prisons are full of such people.

    – Buffy
    yesterday






  • 2





    Your ‘assumption’ is a baseless accusation wrapped up to look pretty.

    – Jon Custer
    yesterday








9




9





What does this have to do with academia? Is this boat programming? meta.stackexchange.com/questions/14470/…

– Anonymous Physicist
yesterday





What does this have to do with academia? Is this boat programming? meta.stackexchange.com/questions/14470/…

– Anonymous Physicist
yesterday




3




3





I'm not sure I understand the boat programming reference, but the question is definitely about academia. The question is asking whether there would be career consequences for a professor whose husband had been convicted of a felony. If the Professor herself had been convicted, I think the answer would be clear. In this case, the connection between the felony and the professor is less direct. However, the nature of the crime (compared to say, assaulting someone) makes the link a little stronger than it might otherwise be

– user1778351
yesterday





I'm not sure I understand the boat programming reference, but the question is definitely about academia. The question is asking whether there would be career consequences for a professor whose husband had been convicted of a felony. If the Professor herself had been convicted, I think the answer would be clear. In this case, the connection between the felony and the professor is less direct. However, the nature of the crime (compared to say, assaulting someone) makes the link a little stronger than it might otherwise be

– user1778351
yesterday




1




1





you are innocent until proven guilty, so a "somewhat stronger link to a felony" still equals innocent.

– Maarten Buis
yesterday





you are innocent until proven guilty, so a "somewhat stronger link to a felony" still equals innocent.

– Maarten Buis
yesterday




5




5





I'll note that drug laws in the US are insane. People get charged with "drug trafficking felonies" when they are nothing more than addicts sharing drugs with friends. The jails/prisons are full of such people.

– Buffy
yesterday





I'll note that drug laws in the US are insane. People get charged with "drug trafficking felonies" when they are nothing more than addicts sharing drugs with friends. The jails/prisons are full of such people.

– Buffy
yesterday




2




2





Your ‘assumption’ is a baseless accusation wrapped up to look pretty.

– Jon Custer
yesterday





Your ‘assumption’ is a baseless accusation wrapped up to look pretty.

– Jon Custer
yesterday










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















7














This is a question which can only the respective university can answer. (I assume in my answer that the police has not proven involvement of the professor in the drug thing.)



Ideally (and most likely also by law, but you do not specify your location), husband and wife (or husband and husband, wife and wife) are treated as two separate people -- if one does a crime, it does not mean that both are involved. That the professor is not involved should also be the default assumption of the university unless the police proved otherwise.



Of course, people often talk and make decisions which are not backed up by the law. It may be of course that there are implications for the professor -- most likely, it's not explicitly said that they are connected to the drug thing.



For implications outside of the university, the same holds. Ideally, nobody treats the prof differently, but people sometimes do.






share|improve this answer








New contributor




Holla is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.





















  • If you need security clearance of some sort (think nuclear physics) spouses might count though.

    – Borgh
    16 hours ago


















1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









7














This is a question which can only the respective university can answer. (I assume in my answer that the police has not proven involvement of the professor in the drug thing.)



Ideally (and most likely also by law, but you do not specify your location), husband and wife (or husband and husband, wife and wife) are treated as two separate people -- if one does a crime, it does not mean that both are involved. That the professor is not involved should also be the default assumption of the university unless the police proved otherwise.



Of course, people often talk and make decisions which are not backed up by the law. It may be of course that there are implications for the professor -- most likely, it's not explicitly said that they are connected to the drug thing.



For implications outside of the university, the same holds. Ideally, nobody treats the prof differently, but people sometimes do.






share|improve this answer








New contributor




Holla is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.





















  • If you need security clearance of some sort (think nuclear physics) spouses might count though.

    – Borgh
    16 hours ago
















7














This is a question which can only the respective university can answer. (I assume in my answer that the police has not proven involvement of the professor in the drug thing.)



Ideally (and most likely also by law, but you do not specify your location), husband and wife (or husband and husband, wife and wife) are treated as two separate people -- if one does a crime, it does not mean that both are involved. That the professor is not involved should also be the default assumption of the university unless the police proved otherwise.



Of course, people often talk and make decisions which are not backed up by the law. It may be of course that there are implications for the professor -- most likely, it's not explicitly said that they are connected to the drug thing.



For implications outside of the university, the same holds. Ideally, nobody treats the prof differently, but people sometimes do.






share|improve this answer








New contributor




Holla is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.





















  • If you need security clearance of some sort (think nuclear physics) spouses might count though.

    – Borgh
    16 hours ago














7












7








7







This is a question which can only the respective university can answer. (I assume in my answer that the police has not proven involvement of the professor in the drug thing.)



Ideally (and most likely also by law, but you do not specify your location), husband and wife (or husband and husband, wife and wife) are treated as two separate people -- if one does a crime, it does not mean that both are involved. That the professor is not involved should also be the default assumption of the university unless the police proved otherwise.



Of course, people often talk and make decisions which are not backed up by the law. It may be of course that there are implications for the professor -- most likely, it's not explicitly said that they are connected to the drug thing.



For implications outside of the university, the same holds. Ideally, nobody treats the prof differently, but people sometimes do.






share|improve this answer








New contributor




Holla is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.










This is a question which can only the respective university can answer. (I assume in my answer that the police has not proven involvement of the professor in the drug thing.)



Ideally (and most likely also by law, but you do not specify your location), husband and wife (or husband and husband, wife and wife) are treated as two separate people -- if one does a crime, it does not mean that both are involved. That the professor is not involved should also be the default assumption of the university unless the police proved otherwise.



Of course, people often talk and make decisions which are not backed up by the law. It may be of course that there are implications for the professor -- most likely, it's not explicitly said that they are connected to the drug thing.



For implications outside of the university, the same holds. Ideally, nobody treats the prof differently, but people sometimes do.







share|improve this answer








New contributor




Holla is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer






New contributor




Holla is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









answered yesterday









HollaHolla

712




712




New contributor




Holla is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.





New contributor





Holla is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






Holla is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.













  • If you need security clearance of some sort (think nuclear physics) spouses might count though.

    – Borgh
    16 hours ago



















  • If you need security clearance of some sort (think nuclear physics) spouses might count though.

    – Borgh
    16 hours ago

















If you need security clearance of some sort (think nuclear physics) spouses might count though.

– Borgh
16 hours ago





If you need security clearance of some sort (think nuclear physics) spouses might count though.

– Borgh
16 hours ago



Popular posts from this blog

Bruad Bilen | Luke uk diar | NawigatsjuunCommonskategorii: BruadCommonskategorii: RunstükenWikiquote: Bruad

What is the offset in a seaplane's hull?

Slayer Innehåll Historia | Stil, komposition och lyrik | Bandets betydelse och framgångar | Sidoprojekt och samarbeten | Kontroverser | Medlemmar | Utmärkelser och nomineringar | Turnéer och festivaler | Diskografi | Referenser | Externa länkar | Navigeringsmenywww.slayer.net”Metal Massacre vol. 1””Metal Massacre vol. 3””Metal Massacre Volume III””Show No Mercy””Haunting the Chapel””Live Undead””Hell Awaits””Reign in Blood””Reign in Blood””Gold & Platinum – Reign in Blood””Golden Gods Awards Winners”originalet”Kerrang! Hall Of Fame””Slayer Looks Back On 37-Year Career In New Video Series: Part Two””South of Heaven””Gold & Platinum – South of Heaven””Seasons in the Abyss””Gold & Platinum - Seasons in the Abyss””Divine Intervention””Divine Intervention - Release group by Slayer””Gold & Platinum - Divine Intervention””Live Intrusion””Undisputed Attitude””Abolish Government/Superficial Love””Release “Slatanic Slaughter: A Tribute to Slayer” by Various Artists””Diabolus in Musica””Soundtrack to the Apocalypse””God Hates Us All””Systematic - Relationships””War at the Warfield””Gold & Platinum - War at the Warfield””Soundtrack to the Apocalypse””Gold & Platinum - Still Reigning””Metallica, Slayer, Iron Mauden Among Winners At Metal Hammer Awards””Eternal Pyre””Eternal Pyre - Slayer release group””Eternal Pyre””Metal Storm Awards 2006””Kerrang! Hall Of Fame””Slayer Wins 'Best Metal' Grammy Award””Slayer Guitarist Jeff Hanneman Dies””Bullet-For My Valentine booed at Metal Hammer Golden Gods Awards””Unholy Aliance””The End Of Slayer?””Slayer: We Could Thrash Out Two More Albums If We're Fast Enough...””'The Unholy Alliance: Chapter III' UK Dates Added”originalet”Megadeth And Slayer To Co-Headline 'Canadian Carnage' Trek”originalet”World Painted Blood””Release “World Painted Blood” by Slayer””Metallica Heading To Cinemas””Slayer, Megadeth To Join Forces For 'European Carnage' Tour - Dec. 18, 2010”originalet”Slayer's Hanneman Contracts Acute Infection; Band To Bring In Guest Guitarist””Cannibal Corpse's Pat O'Brien Will Step In As Slayer's Guest Guitarist”originalet”Slayer’s Jeff Hanneman Dead at 49””Dave Lombardo Says He Made Only $67,000 In 2011 While Touring With Slayer””Slayer: We Do Not Agree With Dave Lombardo's Substance Or Timeline Of Events””Slayer Welcomes Drummer Paul Bostaph Back To The Fold””Slayer Hope to Unveil Never-Before-Heard Jeff Hanneman Material on Next Album””Slayer Debut New Song 'Implode' During Surprise Golden Gods Appearance””Release group Repentless by Slayer””Repentless - Slayer - Credits””Slayer””Metal Storm Awards 2015””Slayer - to release comic book "Repentless #1"””Slayer To Release 'Repentless' 6.66" Vinyl Box Set””BREAKING NEWS: Slayer Announce Farewell Tour””Slayer Recruit Lamb of God, Anthrax, Behemoth + Testament for Final Tour””Slayer lägger ner efter 37 år””Slayer Announces Second North American Leg Of 'Final' Tour””Final World Tour””Slayer Announces Final European Tour With Lamb of God, Anthrax And Obituary””Slayer To Tour Europe With Lamb of God, Anthrax And Obituary””Slayer To Play 'Last French Show Ever' At Next Year's Hellfst””Slayer's Final World Tour Will Extend Into 2019””Death Angel's Rob Cavestany On Slayer's 'Farewell' Tour: 'Some Of Us Could See This Coming'””Testament Has No Plans To Retire Anytime Soon, Says Chuck Billy””Anthrax's Scott Ian On Slayer's 'Farewell' Tour Plans: 'I Was Surprised And I Wasn't Surprised'””Slayer””Slayer's Morbid Schlock””Review/Rock; For Slayer, the Mania Is the Message””Slayer - Biography””Slayer - Reign In Blood”originalet”Dave Lombardo””An exclusive oral history of Slayer”originalet”Exclusive! Interview With Slayer Guitarist Jeff Hanneman”originalet”Thinking Out Loud: Slayer's Kerry King on hair metal, Satan and being polite””Slayer Lyrics””Slayer - Biography””Most influential artists for extreme metal music””Slayer - Reign in Blood””Slayer guitarist Jeff Hanneman dies aged 49””Slatanic Slaughter: A Tribute to Slayer””Gateway to Hell: A Tribute to Slayer””Covered In Blood””Slayer: The Origins of Thrash in San Francisco, CA.””Why They Rule - #6 Slayer”originalet”Guitar World's 100 Greatest Heavy Metal Guitarists Of All Time”originalet”The fans have spoken: Slayer comes out on top in readers' polls”originalet”Tribute to Jeff Hanneman (1964-2013)””Lamb Of God Frontman: We Sound Like A Slayer Rip-Off””BEHEMOTH Frontman Pays Tribute To SLAYER's JEFF HANNEMAN””Slayer, Hatebreed Doing Double Duty On This Year's Ozzfest””System of a Down””Lacuna Coil’s Andrea Ferro Talks Influences, Skateboarding, Band Origins + More””Slayer - Reign in Blood””Into The Lungs of Hell””Slayer rules - en utställning om fans””Slayer and Their Fans Slashed Through a No-Holds-Barred Night at Gas Monkey””Home””Slayer””Gold & Platinum - The Big 4 Live from Sofia, Bulgaria””Exclusive! Interview With Slayer Guitarist Kerry King””2008-02-23: Wiltern, Los Angeles, CA, USA””Slayer's Kerry King To Perform With Megadeth Tonight! - Oct. 21, 2010”originalet”Dave Lombardo - Biography”Slayer Case DismissedArkiveradUltimate Classic Rock: Slayer guitarist Jeff Hanneman dead at 49.”Slayer: "We could never do any thing like Some Kind Of Monster..."””Cannibal Corpse'S Pat O'Brien Will Step In As Slayer'S Guest Guitarist | The Official Slayer Site”originalet”Slayer Wins 'Best Metal' Grammy Award””Slayer Guitarist Jeff Hanneman Dies””Kerrang! Awards 2006 Blog: Kerrang! Hall Of Fame””Kerrang! Awards 2013: Kerrang! Legend”originalet”Metallica, Slayer, Iron Maien Among Winners At Metal Hammer Awards””Metal Hammer Golden Gods Awards””Bullet For My Valentine Booed At Metal Hammer Golden Gods Awards””Metal Storm Awards 2006””Metal Storm Awards 2015””Slayer's Concert History””Slayer - Relationships””Slayer - Releases”Slayers officiella webbplatsSlayer på MusicBrainzOfficiell webbplatsSlayerSlayerr1373445760000 0001 1540 47353068615-5086262726cb13906545x(data)6033143kn20030215029