Why does the setuid bit work inconsistently?





.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty{ margin-bottom:0;
}







8















I wrote the code:



// a.c
#include <stdlib.h>
int main () {
system("/bin/sh");
return 0;
}


compiled with command:



gcc a.c -o a.out


added setuid bit on it:



sudo chown root.root a.out
sudo chmod 4755 a.out


On Ubuntu 14.04, when I run as general user, I got root privilege.



but on Ubuntu 16.04, I still got current user's shell.



Why is it different?










share|improve this question































    8















    I wrote the code:



    // a.c
    #include <stdlib.h>
    int main () {
    system("/bin/sh");
    return 0;
    }


    compiled with command:



    gcc a.c -o a.out


    added setuid bit on it:



    sudo chown root.root a.out
    sudo chmod 4755 a.out


    On Ubuntu 14.04, when I run as general user, I got root privilege.



    but on Ubuntu 16.04, I still got current user's shell.



    Why is it different?










    share|improve this question



























      8












      8








      8








      I wrote the code:



      // a.c
      #include <stdlib.h>
      int main () {
      system("/bin/sh");
      return 0;
      }


      compiled with command:



      gcc a.c -o a.out


      added setuid bit on it:



      sudo chown root.root a.out
      sudo chmod 4755 a.out


      On Ubuntu 14.04, when I run as general user, I got root privilege.



      but on Ubuntu 16.04, I still got current user's shell.



      Why is it different?










      share|improve this question
















      I wrote the code:



      // a.c
      #include <stdlib.h>
      int main () {
      system("/bin/sh");
      return 0;
      }


      compiled with command:



      gcc a.c -o a.out


      added setuid bit on it:



      sudo chown root.root a.out
      sudo chmod 4755 a.out


      On Ubuntu 14.04, when I run as general user, I got root privilege.



      but on Ubuntu 16.04, I still got current user's shell.



      Why is it different?







      linux ubuntu security privileges setuid






      share|improve this question















      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question








      edited May 17 at 5:04









      muru

      39.6k595171




      39.6k595171










      asked May 16 at 17:37









      user10883182user10883182

      433




      433






















          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          9














          What changed is that /bin/sh either became bash or stayed dash which got an additional flag -p mimicking bash's behaviour.



          Bash requires the -p flag to not drop setuid privilege as explained in its man page:




          If the shell is started with the effective user (group) id not equal to the real user
          (group) id, and the -p option is not supplied, no startup files are read, shell functions
          are not inherited from the environment, the SHELLOPTS, BASHOPTS, CDPATH, and GLOBIGNORE
          variables, if they appear in the environment, are ignored, and the effective user id is
          set to the real user id
          . If the -p option is supplied at invocation, the startup behavior
          is the same, but the effective user id is not reset.




          Before, dash didn't care about this and allowed setuid execution (by doing nothing to prevent it). But Ubuntu 16.04's dash's manpage has an additional option described, similar to bash:




          -p priv

          Do not attempt to reset effective uid if it does not match uid. This is not set by default to help avoid incorrect usage by
          setuid root programs via system(3) or popen(3).




          This option didn't exist in upstream (which might not be have been reactive to a proposed patch*) nor Debian 9 but is present in Debian buster which got the patch since 2018.



          NOTE: as explained by Stéphane Chazelas, it's too late to invoke "/bin/sh -p" in system() because system() runs anything given through /bin/sh and so the setuid is already dropped. derobert's answer explains how to handle this, in the code before system().



          * more details on history here and there.






          share|improve this answer


























          • system("bash -p") runs sh -c "bash -p" so the privileges have already been dropped when bash is executed.

            – Stéphane Chazelas
            May 16 at 18:07











          • oh well ok. I'll remove the "solution" part better handled by derobert's answer anyway.

            – A.B
            May 16 at 18:08











          • See also bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=734869

            – Stéphane Chazelas
            May 16 at 18:16











          • Looks like Ubuntu fixed dash in wily (15.10). bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dash/+bug/1215660

            – Mark Plotnick
            May 16 at 18:20






          • 1





            Note that Debian used to go the other way round. It used to patch bash so as not to drop privileges. Whether it's an improvement is arguable. Now, people who want to do a system() with elevated privileges (which, granted, they shouldn't in the first place) end-up doing a setresuid() before which is a lot worse as then the shell doesn't know it's suid so doesn't activate the mode where it doesn't trust its environment.

            – Stéphane Chazelas
            May 16 at 18:40



















          8














          Probably the shell is changing its effective user ID back to the real user ID as part of its startup for some reason or another. You could verify this by adding:



          /* needs _GNU_SOURCE; non-Linux users see setregid/setreuid instead */
          uid_t euid = geteuid(), egid = getegid();
          setresgid(egid, egid, egid);
          setresuid(euid, euid, euid);


          before your system(). (Actually, even on Linux, you probably only need to set the real ones; the saved ones should be fine to leave alone. This is just brute force to debug. Depending on why you're set-id, you may of course need to save the real IDs somewhere as well.)



          [Also, if this isn't just an exercise learning how setid works, then there are lot of security issues to worry about, especially when calling a shell. There are many environment variables, for example, that affect the shell's behavior. Prefer an already-existing approach like sudo if at all possible.]






          share|improve this answer


























          • I concentrated on the why it changed, while you provided the how to avoid the issue. +1

            – A.B
            May 16 at 18:07











          • Of course, if you really do need somewhere to save the real IDs, the saved ID is an awfully convenient place to do it. Especially if the effective IDs are not root:root.

            – Kevin
            May 17 at 3:25












          Your Answer








          StackExchange.ready(function() {
          var channelOptions = {
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "106"
          };
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
          createEditor();
          });
          }
          else {
          createEditor();
          }
          });

          function createEditor() {
          StackExchange.prepareEditor({
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: false,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: null,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader: {
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          },
          onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          });


          }
          });














          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2funix.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f519338%2fwhy-does-the-setuid-bit-work-inconsistently%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes








          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes









          9














          What changed is that /bin/sh either became bash or stayed dash which got an additional flag -p mimicking bash's behaviour.



          Bash requires the -p flag to not drop setuid privilege as explained in its man page:




          If the shell is started with the effective user (group) id not equal to the real user
          (group) id, and the -p option is not supplied, no startup files are read, shell functions
          are not inherited from the environment, the SHELLOPTS, BASHOPTS, CDPATH, and GLOBIGNORE
          variables, if they appear in the environment, are ignored, and the effective user id is
          set to the real user id
          . If the -p option is supplied at invocation, the startup behavior
          is the same, but the effective user id is not reset.




          Before, dash didn't care about this and allowed setuid execution (by doing nothing to prevent it). But Ubuntu 16.04's dash's manpage has an additional option described, similar to bash:




          -p priv

          Do not attempt to reset effective uid if it does not match uid. This is not set by default to help avoid incorrect usage by
          setuid root programs via system(3) or popen(3).




          This option didn't exist in upstream (which might not be have been reactive to a proposed patch*) nor Debian 9 but is present in Debian buster which got the patch since 2018.



          NOTE: as explained by Stéphane Chazelas, it's too late to invoke "/bin/sh -p" in system() because system() runs anything given through /bin/sh and so the setuid is already dropped. derobert's answer explains how to handle this, in the code before system().



          * more details on history here and there.






          share|improve this answer


























          • system("bash -p") runs sh -c "bash -p" so the privileges have already been dropped when bash is executed.

            – Stéphane Chazelas
            May 16 at 18:07











          • oh well ok. I'll remove the "solution" part better handled by derobert's answer anyway.

            – A.B
            May 16 at 18:08











          • See also bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=734869

            – Stéphane Chazelas
            May 16 at 18:16











          • Looks like Ubuntu fixed dash in wily (15.10). bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dash/+bug/1215660

            – Mark Plotnick
            May 16 at 18:20






          • 1





            Note that Debian used to go the other way round. It used to patch bash so as not to drop privileges. Whether it's an improvement is arguable. Now, people who want to do a system() with elevated privileges (which, granted, they shouldn't in the first place) end-up doing a setresuid() before which is a lot worse as then the shell doesn't know it's suid so doesn't activate the mode where it doesn't trust its environment.

            – Stéphane Chazelas
            May 16 at 18:40
















          9














          What changed is that /bin/sh either became bash or stayed dash which got an additional flag -p mimicking bash's behaviour.



          Bash requires the -p flag to not drop setuid privilege as explained in its man page:




          If the shell is started with the effective user (group) id not equal to the real user
          (group) id, and the -p option is not supplied, no startup files are read, shell functions
          are not inherited from the environment, the SHELLOPTS, BASHOPTS, CDPATH, and GLOBIGNORE
          variables, if they appear in the environment, are ignored, and the effective user id is
          set to the real user id
          . If the -p option is supplied at invocation, the startup behavior
          is the same, but the effective user id is not reset.




          Before, dash didn't care about this and allowed setuid execution (by doing nothing to prevent it). But Ubuntu 16.04's dash's manpage has an additional option described, similar to bash:




          -p priv

          Do not attempt to reset effective uid if it does not match uid. This is not set by default to help avoid incorrect usage by
          setuid root programs via system(3) or popen(3).




          This option didn't exist in upstream (which might not be have been reactive to a proposed patch*) nor Debian 9 but is present in Debian buster which got the patch since 2018.



          NOTE: as explained by Stéphane Chazelas, it's too late to invoke "/bin/sh -p" in system() because system() runs anything given through /bin/sh and so the setuid is already dropped. derobert's answer explains how to handle this, in the code before system().



          * more details on history here and there.






          share|improve this answer


























          • system("bash -p") runs sh -c "bash -p" so the privileges have already been dropped when bash is executed.

            – Stéphane Chazelas
            May 16 at 18:07











          • oh well ok. I'll remove the "solution" part better handled by derobert's answer anyway.

            – A.B
            May 16 at 18:08











          • See also bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=734869

            – Stéphane Chazelas
            May 16 at 18:16











          • Looks like Ubuntu fixed dash in wily (15.10). bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dash/+bug/1215660

            – Mark Plotnick
            May 16 at 18:20






          • 1





            Note that Debian used to go the other way round. It used to patch bash so as not to drop privileges. Whether it's an improvement is arguable. Now, people who want to do a system() with elevated privileges (which, granted, they shouldn't in the first place) end-up doing a setresuid() before which is a lot worse as then the shell doesn't know it's suid so doesn't activate the mode where it doesn't trust its environment.

            – Stéphane Chazelas
            May 16 at 18:40














          9












          9








          9







          What changed is that /bin/sh either became bash or stayed dash which got an additional flag -p mimicking bash's behaviour.



          Bash requires the -p flag to not drop setuid privilege as explained in its man page:




          If the shell is started with the effective user (group) id not equal to the real user
          (group) id, and the -p option is not supplied, no startup files are read, shell functions
          are not inherited from the environment, the SHELLOPTS, BASHOPTS, CDPATH, and GLOBIGNORE
          variables, if they appear in the environment, are ignored, and the effective user id is
          set to the real user id
          . If the -p option is supplied at invocation, the startup behavior
          is the same, but the effective user id is not reset.




          Before, dash didn't care about this and allowed setuid execution (by doing nothing to prevent it). But Ubuntu 16.04's dash's manpage has an additional option described, similar to bash:




          -p priv

          Do not attempt to reset effective uid if it does not match uid. This is not set by default to help avoid incorrect usage by
          setuid root programs via system(3) or popen(3).




          This option didn't exist in upstream (which might not be have been reactive to a proposed patch*) nor Debian 9 but is present in Debian buster which got the patch since 2018.



          NOTE: as explained by Stéphane Chazelas, it's too late to invoke "/bin/sh -p" in system() because system() runs anything given through /bin/sh and so the setuid is already dropped. derobert's answer explains how to handle this, in the code before system().



          * more details on history here and there.






          share|improve this answer















          What changed is that /bin/sh either became bash or stayed dash which got an additional flag -p mimicking bash's behaviour.



          Bash requires the -p flag to not drop setuid privilege as explained in its man page:




          If the shell is started with the effective user (group) id not equal to the real user
          (group) id, and the -p option is not supplied, no startup files are read, shell functions
          are not inherited from the environment, the SHELLOPTS, BASHOPTS, CDPATH, and GLOBIGNORE
          variables, if they appear in the environment, are ignored, and the effective user id is
          set to the real user id
          . If the -p option is supplied at invocation, the startup behavior
          is the same, but the effective user id is not reset.




          Before, dash didn't care about this and allowed setuid execution (by doing nothing to prevent it). But Ubuntu 16.04's dash's manpage has an additional option described, similar to bash:




          -p priv

          Do not attempt to reset effective uid if it does not match uid. This is not set by default to help avoid incorrect usage by
          setuid root programs via system(3) or popen(3).




          This option didn't exist in upstream (which might not be have been reactive to a proposed patch*) nor Debian 9 but is present in Debian buster which got the patch since 2018.



          NOTE: as explained by Stéphane Chazelas, it's too late to invoke "/bin/sh -p" in system() because system() runs anything given through /bin/sh and so the setuid is already dropped. derobert's answer explains how to handle this, in the code before system().



          * more details on history here and there.







          share|improve this answer














          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer








          edited May 16 at 18:40

























          answered May 16 at 18:05









          A.BA.B

          7,12511333




          7,12511333













          • system("bash -p") runs sh -c "bash -p" so the privileges have already been dropped when bash is executed.

            – Stéphane Chazelas
            May 16 at 18:07











          • oh well ok. I'll remove the "solution" part better handled by derobert's answer anyway.

            – A.B
            May 16 at 18:08











          • See also bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=734869

            – Stéphane Chazelas
            May 16 at 18:16











          • Looks like Ubuntu fixed dash in wily (15.10). bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dash/+bug/1215660

            – Mark Plotnick
            May 16 at 18:20






          • 1





            Note that Debian used to go the other way round. It used to patch bash so as not to drop privileges. Whether it's an improvement is arguable. Now, people who want to do a system() with elevated privileges (which, granted, they shouldn't in the first place) end-up doing a setresuid() before which is a lot worse as then the shell doesn't know it's suid so doesn't activate the mode where it doesn't trust its environment.

            – Stéphane Chazelas
            May 16 at 18:40



















          • system("bash -p") runs sh -c "bash -p" so the privileges have already been dropped when bash is executed.

            – Stéphane Chazelas
            May 16 at 18:07











          • oh well ok. I'll remove the "solution" part better handled by derobert's answer anyway.

            – A.B
            May 16 at 18:08











          • See also bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=734869

            – Stéphane Chazelas
            May 16 at 18:16











          • Looks like Ubuntu fixed dash in wily (15.10). bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dash/+bug/1215660

            – Mark Plotnick
            May 16 at 18:20






          • 1





            Note that Debian used to go the other way round. It used to patch bash so as not to drop privileges. Whether it's an improvement is arguable. Now, people who want to do a system() with elevated privileges (which, granted, they shouldn't in the first place) end-up doing a setresuid() before which is a lot worse as then the shell doesn't know it's suid so doesn't activate the mode where it doesn't trust its environment.

            – Stéphane Chazelas
            May 16 at 18:40

















          system("bash -p") runs sh -c "bash -p" so the privileges have already been dropped when bash is executed.

          – Stéphane Chazelas
          May 16 at 18:07





          system("bash -p") runs sh -c "bash -p" so the privileges have already been dropped when bash is executed.

          – Stéphane Chazelas
          May 16 at 18:07













          oh well ok. I'll remove the "solution" part better handled by derobert's answer anyway.

          – A.B
          May 16 at 18:08





          oh well ok. I'll remove the "solution" part better handled by derobert's answer anyway.

          – A.B
          May 16 at 18:08













          See also bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=734869

          – Stéphane Chazelas
          May 16 at 18:16





          See also bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=734869

          – Stéphane Chazelas
          May 16 at 18:16













          Looks like Ubuntu fixed dash in wily (15.10). bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dash/+bug/1215660

          – Mark Plotnick
          May 16 at 18:20





          Looks like Ubuntu fixed dash in wily (15.10). bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dash/+bug/1215660

          – Mark Plotnick
          May 16 at 18:20




          1




          1





          Note that Debian used to go the other way round. It used to patch bash so as not to drop privileges. Whether it's an improvement is arguable. Now, people who want to do a system() with elevated privileges (which, granted, they shouldn't in the first place) end-up doing a setresuid() before which is a lot worse as then the shell doesn't know it's suid so doesn't activate the mode where it doesn't trust its environment.

          – Stéphane Chazelas
          May 16 at 18:40





          Note that Debian used to go the other way round. It used to patch bash so as not to drop privileges. Whether it's an improvement is arguable. Now, people who want to do a system() with elevated privileges (which, granted, they shouldn't in the first place) end-up doing a setresuid() before which is a lot worse as then the shell doesn't know it's suid so doesn't activate the mode where it doesn't trust its environment.

          – Stéphane Chazelas
          May 16 at 18:40













          8














          Probably the shell is changing its effective user ID back to the real user ID as part of its startup for some reason or another. You could verify this by adding:



          /* needs _GNU_SOURCE; non-Linux users see setregid/setreuid instead */
          uid_t euid = geteuid(), egid = getegid();
          setresgid(egid, egid, egid);
          setresuid(euid, euid, euid);


          before your system(). (Actually, even on Linux, you probably only need to set the real ones; the saved ones should be fine to leave alone. This is just brute force to debug. Depending on why you're set-id, you may of course need to save the real IDs somewhere as well.)



          [Also, if this isn't just an exercise learning how setid works, then there are lot of security issues to worry about, especially when calling a shell. There are many environment variables, for example, that affect the shell's behavior. Prefer an already-existing approach like sudo if at all possible.]






          share|improve this answer


























          • I concentrated on the why it changed, while you provided the how to avoid the issue. +1

            – A.B
            May 16 at 18:07











          • Of course, if you really do need somewhere to save the real IDs, the saved ID is an awfully convenient place to do it. Especially if the effective IDs are not root:root.

            – Kevin
            May 17 at 3:25
















          8














          Probably the shell is changing its effective user ID back to the real user ID as part of its startup for some reason or another. You could verify this by adding:



          /* needs _GNU_SOURCE; non-Linux users see setregid/setreuid instead */
          uid_t euid = geteuid(), egid = getegid();
          setresgid(egid, egid, egid);
          setresuid(euid, euid, euid);


          before your system(). (Actually, even on Linux, you probably only need to set the real ones; the saved ones should be fine to leave alone. This is just brute force to debug. Depending on why you're set-id, you may of course need to save the real IDs somewhere as well.)



          [Also, if this isn't just an exercise learning how setid works, then there are lot of security issues to worry about, especially when calling a shell. There are many environment variables, for example, that affect the shell's behavior. Prefer an already-existing approach like sudo if at all possible.]






          share|improve this answer


























          • I concentrated on the why it changed, while you provided the how to avoid the issue. +1

            – A.B
            May 16 at 18:07











          • Of course, if you really do need somewhere to save the real IDs, the saved ID is an awfully convenient place to do it. Especially if the effective IDs are not root:root.

            – Kevin
            May 17 at 3:25














          8












          8








          8







          Probably the shell is changing its effective user ID back to the real user ID as part of its startup for some reason or another. You could verify this by adding:



          /* needs _GNU_SOURCE; non-Linux users see setregid/setreuid instead */
          uid_t euid = geteuid(), egid = getegid();
          setresgid(egid, egid, egid);
          setresuid(euid, euid, euid);


          before your system(). (Actually, even on Linux, you probably only need to set the real ones; the saved ones should be fine to leave alone. This is just brute force to debug. Depending on why you're set-id, you may of course need to save the real IDs somewhere as well.)



          [Also, if this isn't just an exercise learning how setid works, then there are lot of security issues to worry about, especially when calling a shell. There are many environment variables, for example, that affect the shell's behavior. Prefer an already-existing approach like sudo if at all possible.]






          share|improve this answer















          Probably the shell is changing its effective user ID back to the real user ID as part of its startup for some reason or another. You could verify this by adding:



          /* needs _GNU_SOURCE; non-Linux users see setregid/setreuid instead */
          uid_t euid = geteuid(), egid = getegid();
          setresgid(egid, egid, egid);
          setresuid(euid, euid, euid);


          before your system(). (Actually, even on Linux, you probably only need to set the real ones; the saved ones should be fine to leave alone. This is just brute force to debug. Depending on why you're set-id, you may of course need to save the real IDs somewhere as well.)



          [Also, if this isn't just an exercise learning how setid works, then there are lot of security issues to worry about, especially when calling a shell. There are many environment variables, for example, that affect the shell's behavior. Prefer an already-existing approach like sudo if at all possible.]







          share|improve this answer














          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer








          edited May 16 at 19:16

























          answered May 16 at 18:05









          derobertderobert

          77.2k8168227




          77.2k8168227













          • I concentrated on the why it changed, while you provided the how to avoid the issue. +1

            – A.B
            May 16 at 18:07











          • Of course, if you really do need somewhere to save the real IDs, the saved ID is an awfully convenient place to do it. Especially if the effective IDs are not root:root.

            – Kevin
            May 17 at 3:25



















          • I concentrated on the why it changed, while you provided the how to avoid the issue. +1

            – A.B
            May 16 at 18:07











          • Of course, if you really do need somewhere to save the real IDs, the saved ID is an awfully convenient place to do it. Especially if the effective IDs are not root:root.

            – Kevin
            May 17 at 3:25

















          I concentrated on the why it changed, while you provided the how to avoid the issue. +1

          – A.B
          May 16 at 18:07





          I concentrated on the why it changed, while you provided the how to avoid the issue. +1

          – A.B
          May 16 at 18:07













          Of course, if you really do need somewhere to save the real IDs, the saved ID is an awfully convenient place to do it. Especially if the effective IDs are not root:root.

          – Kevin
          May 17 at 3:25





          Of course, if you really do need somewhere to save the real IDs, the saved ID is an awfully convenient place to do it. Especially if the effective IDs are not root:root.

          – Kevin
          May 17 at 3:25


















          draft saved

          draft discarded




















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to Unix & Linux Stack Exchange!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2funix.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f519338%2fwhy-does-the-setuid-bit-work-inconsistently%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          Bruad Bilen | Luke uk diar | NawigatsjuunCommonskategorii: BruadCommonskategorii: RunstükenWikiquote: Bruad

          What is the offset in a seaplane's hull?

          Slayer Innehåll Historia | Stil, komposition och lyrik | Bandets betydelse och framgångar | Sidoprojekt och samarbeten | Kontroverser | Medlemmar | Utmärkelser och nomineringar | Turnéer och festivaler | Diskografi | Referenser | Externa länkar | Navigeringsmenywww.slayer.net”Metal Massacre vol. 1””Metal Massacre vol. 3””Metal Massacre Volume III””Show No Mercy””Haunting the Chapel””Live Undead””Hell Awaits””Reign in Blood””Reign in Blood””Gold & Platinum – Reign in Blood””Golden Gods Awards Winners”originalet”Kerrang! Hall Of Fame””Slayer Looks Back On 37-Year Career In New Video Series: Part Two””South of Heaven””Gold & Platinum – South of Heaven””Seasons in the Abyss””Gold & Platinum - Seasons in the Abyss””Divine Intervention””Divine Intervention - Release group by Slayer””Gold & Platinum - Divine Intervention””Live Intrusion””Undisputed Attitude””Abolish Government/Superficial Love””Release “Slatanic Slaughter: A Tribute to Slayer” by Various Artists””Diabolus in Musica””Soundtrack to the Apocalypse””God Hates Us All””Systematic - Relationships””War at the Warfield””Gold & Platinum - War at the Warfield””Soundtrack to the Apocalypse””Gold & Platinum - Still Reigning””Metallica, Slayer, Iron Mauden Among Winners At Metal Hammer Awards””Eternal Pyre””Eternal Pyre - Slayer release group””Eternal Pyre””Metal Storm Awards 2006””Kerrang! Hall Of Fame””Slayer Wins 'Best Metal' Grammy Award””Slayer Guitarist Jeff Hanneman Dies””Bullet-For My Valentine booed at Metal Hammer Golden Gods Awards””Unholy Aliance””The End Of Slayer?””Slayer: We Could Thrash Out Two More Albums If We're Fast Enough...””'The Unholy Alliance: Chapter III' UK Dates Added”originalet”Megadeth And Slayer To Co-Headline 'Canadian Carnage' Trek”originalet”World Painted Blood””Release “World Painted Blood” by Slayer””Metallica Heading To Cinemas””Slayer, Megadeth To Join Forces For 'European Carnage' Tour - Dec. 18, 2010”originalet”Slayer's Hanneman Contracts Acute Infection; Band To Bring In Guest Guitarist””Cannibal Corpse's Pat O'Brien Will Step In As Slayer's Guest Guitarist”originalet”Slayer’s Jeff Hanneman Dead at 49””Dave Lombardo Says He Made Only $67,000 In 2011 While Touring With Slayer””Slayer: We Do Not Agree With Dave Lombardo's Substance Or Timeline Of Events””Slayer Welcomes Drummer Paul Bostaph Back To The Fold””Slayer Hope to Unveil Never-Before-Heard Jeff Hanneman Material on Next Album””Slayer Debut New Song 'Implode' During Surprise Golden Gods Appearance””Release group Repentless by Slayer””Repentless - Slayer - Credits””Slayer””Metal Storm Awards 2015””Slayer - to release comic book "Repentless #1"””Slayer To Release 'Repentless' 6.66" Vinyl Box Set””BREAKING NEWS: Slayer Announce Farewell Tour””Slayer Recruit Lamb of God, Anthrax, Behemoth + Testament for Final Tour””Slayer lägger ner efter 37 år””Slayer Announces Second North American Leg Of 'Final' Tour””Final World Tour””Slayer Announces Final European Tour With Lamb of God, Anthrax And Obituary””Slayer To Tour Europe With Lamb of God, Anthrax And Obituary””Slayer To Play 'Last French Show Ever' At Next Year's Hellfst””Slayer's Final World Tour Will Extend Into 2019””Death Angel's Rob Cavestany On Slayer's 'Farewell' Tour: 'Some Of Us Could See This Coming'””Testament Has No Plans To Retire Anytime Soon, Says Chuck Billy””Anthrax's Scott Ian On Slayer's 'Farewell' Tour Plans: 'I Was Surprised And I Wasn't Surprised'””Slayer””Slayer's Morbid Schlock””Review/Rock; For Slayer, the Mania Is the Message””Slayer - Biography””Slayer - Reign In Blood”originalet”Dave Lombardo””An exclusive oral history of Slayer”originalet”Exclusive! Interview With Slayer Guitarist Jeff Hanneman”originalet”Thinking Out Loud: Slayer's Kerry King on hair metal, Satan and being polite””Slayer Lyrics””Slayer - Biography””Most influential artists for extreme metal music””Slayer - Reign in Blood””Slayer guitarist Jeff Hanneman dies aged 49””Slatanic Slaughter: A Tribute to Slayer””Gateway to Hell: A Tribute to Slayer””Covered In Blood””Slayer: The Origins of Thrash in San Francisco, CA.””Why They Rule - #6 Slayer”originalet”Guitar World's 100 Greatest Heavy Metal Guitarists Of All Time”originalet”The fans have spoken: Slayer comes out on top in readers' polls”originalet”Tribute to Jeff Hanneman (1964-2013)””Lamb Of God Frontman: We Sound Like A Slayer Rip-Off””BEHEMOTH Frontman Pays Tribute To SLAYER's JEFF HANNEMAN””Slayer, Hatebreed Doing Double Duty On This Year's Ozzfest””System of a Down””Lacuna Coil’s Andrea Ferro Talks Influences, Skateboarding, Band Origins + More””Slayer - Reign in Blood””Into The Lungs of Hell””Slayer rules - en utställning om fans””Slayer and Their Fans Slashed Through a No-Holds-Barred Night at Gas Monkey””Home””Slayer””Gold & Platinum - The Big 4 Live from Sofia, Bulgaria””Exclusive! Interview With Slayer Guitarist Kerry King””2008-02-23: Wiltern, Los Angeles, CA, USA””Slayer's Kerry King To Perform With Megadeth Tonight! - Oct. 21, 2010”originalet”Dave Lombardo - Biography”Slayer Case DismissedArkiveradUltimate Classic Rock: Slayer guitarist Jeff Hanneman dead at 49.”Slayer: "We could never do any thing like Some Kind Of Monster..."””Cannibal Corpse'S Pat O'Brien Will Step In As Slayer'S Guest Guitarist | The Official Slayer Site”originalet”Slayer Wins 'Best Metal' Grammy Award””Slayer Guitarist Jeff Hanneman Dies””Kerrang! Awards 2006 Blog: Kerrang! Hall Of Fame””Kerrang! Awards 2013: Kerrang! Legend”originalet”Metallica, Slayer, Iron Maien Among Winners At Metal Hammer Awards””Metal Hammer Golden Gods Awards””Bullet For My Valentine Booed At Metal Hammer Golden Gods Awards””Metal Storm Awards 2006””Metal Storm Awards 2015””Slayer's Concert History””Slayer - Relationships””Slayer - Releases”Slayers officiella webbplatsSlayer på MusicBrainzOfficiell webbplatsSlayerSlayerr1373445760000 0001 1540 47353068615-5086262726cb13906545x(data)6033143kn20030215029