Break equation in parts
.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty{
margin-bottom:0;
}
I want to break this equation in multi-line but unable to get it!
documentclass{article}
usepackage{amsmath}
DeclareMathOperator{E}{E}
begin{document}
begin{multline*}
P_t=
frac{1}{2}Bigl(m_t+v_t-u_t
+(frac{1-zeta }{2})(frac{E_{t-1}m_t+frac{1-zeta }{2zeta }E_{t-
2}m_t+frac{zeta (1-zeta )}{2(1+zeta )}E_{t-2}P_{t-1}+frac{zeta }
{2}P_{t-1}+frac{zeta }{1+zeta }P_{t-2}}{(1+zeta )}))bigr\
+frac{(1-zeta )}{4}Bigl(frac{E_{t-2}m_t+(frac{zeta }{2})(E_{t-2}P_{t-
1}+P_{t-2})}{(1+zeta )})Bigr) \
+frac{zeta }{4}(Bigl((P_{t-1}+P_{t-2})Bigr)
end{multline*}
end{document}
It's getting out of the mage, so I tired to break it but still it's not showing the correct showing. Can anyone help to identify the problem in coding? How to use breqn
?
equations amsmath
add a comment
|
I want to break this equation in multi-line but unable to get it!
documentclass{article}
usepackage{amsmath}
DeclareMathOperator{E}{E}
begin{document}
begin{multline*}
P_t=
frac{1}{2}Bigl(m_t+v_t-u_t
+(frac{1-zeta }{2})(frac{E_{t-1}m_t+frac{1-zeta }{2zeta }E_{t-
2}m_t+frac{zeta (1-zeta )}{2(1+zeta )}E_{t-2}P_{t-1}+frac{zeta }
{2}P_{t-1}+frac{zeta }{1+zeta }P_{t-2}}{(1+zeta )}))bigr\
+frac{(1-zeta )}{4}Bigl(frac{E_{t-2}m_t+(frac{zeta }{2})(E_{t-2}P_{t-
1}+P_{t-2})}{(1+zeta )})Bigr) \
+frac{zeta }{4}(Bigl((P_{t-1}+P_{t-2})Bigr)
end{multline*}
end{document}
It's getting out of the mage, so I tired to break it but still it's not showing the correct showing. Can anyone help to identify the problem in coding? How to use breqn
?
equations amsmath
1
)bigr\
is applying bigr to\
presumably you intendedbigr)\
– David Carlisle
May 27 at 7:34
I suggest you use the chktex program, which should be included in your distribution, to find unbalanced pairs of parentheses.
– Andrew Swann
May 27 at 8:18
add a comment
|
I want to break this equation in multi-line but unable to get it!
documentclass{article}
usepackage{amsmath}
DeclareMathOperator{E}{E}
begin{document}
begin{multline*}
P_t=
frac{1}{2}Bigl(m_t+v_t-u_t
+(frac{1-zeta }{2})(frac{E_{t-1}m_t+frac{1-zeta }{2zeta }E_{t-
2}m_t+frac{zeta (1-zeta )}{2(1+zeta )}E_{t-2}P_{t-1}+frac{zeta }
{2}P_{t-1}+frac{zeta }{1+zeta }P_{t-2}}{(1+zeta )}))bigr\
+frac{(1-zeta )}{4}Bigl(frac{E_{t-2}m_t+(frac{zeta }{2})(E_{t-2}P_{t-
1}+P_{t-2})}{(1+zeta )})Bigr) \
+frac{zeta }{4}(Bigl((P_{t-1}+P_{t-2})Bigr)
end{multline*}
end{document}
It's getting out of the mage, so I tired to break it but still it's not showing the correct showing. Can anyone help to identify the problem in coding? How to use breqn
?
equations amsmath
I want to break this equation in multi-line but unable to get it!
documentclass{article}
usepackage{amsmath}
DeclareMathOperator{E}{E}
begin{document}
begin{multline*}
P_t=
frac{1}{2}Bigl(m_t+v_t-u_t
+(frac{1-zeta }{2})(frac{E_{t-1}m_t+frac{1-zeta }{2zeta }E_{t-
2}m_t+frac{zeta (1-zeta )}{2(1+zeta )}E_{t-2}P_{t-1}+frac{zeta }
{2}P_{t-1}+frac{zeta }{1+zeta }P_{t-2}}{(1+zeta )}))bigr\
+frac{(1-zeta )}{4}Bigl(frac{E_{t-2}m_t+(frac{zeta }{2})(E_{t-2}P_{t-
1}+P_{t-2})}{(1+zeta )})Bigr) \
+frac{zeta }{4}(Bigl((P_{t-1}+P_{t-2})Bigr)
end{multline*}
end{document}
It's getting out of the mage, so I tired to break it but still it's not showing the correct showing. Can anyone help to identify the problem in coding? How to use breqn
?
equations amsmath
equations amsmath
edited May 27 at 8:12
Andrew Swann
81.6k9 gold badges142 silver badges347 bronze badges
81.6k9 gold badges142 silver badges347 bronze badges
asked May 27 at 7:25
HenamHenam
965 bronze badges
965 bronze badges
1
)bigr\
is applying bigr to\
presumably you intendedbigr)\
– David Carlisle
May 27 at 7:34
I suggest you use the chktex program, which should be included in your distribution, to find unbalanced pairs of parentheses.
– Andrew Swann
May 27 at 8:18
add a comment
|
1
)bigr\
is applying bigr to\
presumably you intendedbigr)\
– David Carlisle
May 27 at 7:34
I suggest you use the chktex program, which should be included in your distribution, to find unbalanced pairs of parentheses.
– Andrew Swann
May 27 at 8:18
1
1
)bigr\
is applying bigr to \
presumably you intended bigr)\
– David Carlisle
May 27 at 7:34
)bigr\
is applying bigr to \
presumably you intended bigr)\
– David Carlisle
May 27 at 7:34
I suggest you use the chktex program, which should be included in your distribution, to find unbalanced pairs of parentheses.
– Andrew Swann
May 27 at 8:18
I suggest you use the chktex program, which should be included in your distribution, to find unbalanced pairs of parentheses.
– Andrew Swann
May 27 at 8:18
add a comment
|
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
You overuse parentheses. If I've well understood your formula, here is a layout which fits on two lines, with the geometry
package, to have more decent margins. Also, I prefer to use the medium-size fractions from nccmath
for fractionary coefficients:
documentclass{article}
usepackage[showframe]{geometry}
usepackage{amsmath, nccmath}
DeclareMathOperator{E}{E}
begin{document}
vspace*{2ex}
begin{multline*}
P_t=
mfrac{1}{2}biggl(m_t+v_t-u_t
+frac{1-zeta }{2},frac{E_{t-1}m_t+frac{1-zeta }{2zeta }E_{t-2}m_t+frac{zeta (1-zeta )}{2(1+zeta )}E_{t-2}P_{t-1}+frac{zeta }{2}P_{t-1} +frac{zeta }{1+zeta }P_{t-2}}{1+zeta}biggr) \
+frac{1-zeta }{4},frac{E_{t-2}m_t+frac{zeta }{2}(E_{t-2}P_{t-1}+P_{t-2})}{1+zeta} +frac{zeta }{4}(P_{t-1}+P_{t-2})
end{multline*}
end{document}
Thanks, I got my mistake.
– Henam
May 27 at 9:48
1
I think you should replaceP_t
withP_t
... And, since the preamble features the instructionDeclareMathOperator{E}{E}
, you may also want to replace all intstances ofE
in the mathy material withE
.
– Mico
May 27 at 10:57
Before suggesting making "more decent margins", please consider the final destination of the document. If it's submitted for publication in a journal, and the page size of the journal is too narrow to accommodate the display, you run the risk of having changes made in the editorial process possibly leading to a change in meaning or actual errors. Such formatting adjustments are much better made by the author.
– barbara beeton
May 27 at 11:53
@barbarabeeton: You're right, I should have added 'if wide margins are not required'. I'm not sure most people really need these very wide margins, unless they use marginal notes.
– Bernard
May 27 at 13:05
add a comment
|
I would simplify the formula first and then typeset it across three rows using an align*
environment.
documentclass{article}
usepackage{amsmath}
DeclareMathOperator{E}{E} % expectations operator
begin{document}
begin{align*}
P_t
&=frac{1}{2}(m_t+v_t-u_t)
+frac{1}{4}frac{1-zeta}{1+zeta}
biggl[E_{t-1}m_t +frac{1-zeta}{2zeta }E_{t-2}m_t\
&quad +frac{zeta (1-zeta)}{2(1+zeta)}E_{t-2}P_{t-1}
+frac{zeta}{2}P_{t-1}+frac{zeta}{1+zeta }P_{t-2}
+E_{t-2}m_t\
&quad +frac{zeta}{2} (E_{t-2}P_{t-1}+P_{t-2})biggr]
+frac{1}{4}zeta (P_{t-1}+P_{t-2})
end{align*}
end{document}
1
That's a really cool way to represent it. Didn't think of it, thanks a lot!
– Henam
May 27 at 11:25
add a comment
|
After removing all unnecessary brackets, correcting size of used ones, with use nccmath
for medium size fractions and changed lines of equation:
documentclass{article}
usepackage{nccmath}
%---------------- show page layout. don't use in a real document!
usepackage{showframe}
renewcommandShowFrameLinethickness{0.15pt}
renewcommand*ShowFrameColor{color{red}}
begin{document}
begin{multline*}
P_t=
frac{1}{2}Biggl(m_t+v_t-u_t \
+ frac{1-zeta }{2}frac{E_{t-1}m_t
+ mfrac{1-zeta}{2zeta}E_{t-2}m_t
+ mfrac{zeta(1-zeta)}{2(1+zeta)}E_{t-2}P_{t-1}
+ mfrac{zeta}{2}P_{t-1}
+ mfrac{zeta}{1+zeta}P_{t-2}}
{1+zeta}Biggr) \
+ frac{1-zeta}{4}
frac{E_{t-2}m_t + frac{zeta}{2}(E_{t-2}P_{t-1}
+ P_{t-2})}{1+zeta}
+ frac{zeta }{4}Bigl(P_{t-1}+P_{t-2}Bigr)
end{multline*}
end{document}
(red lines indicate text borders)
Thanks a lot, it clearly answers my question.
– Henam
May 27 at 9:47
I would replacePi_t
withP_t
...
– Mico
May 27 at 11:19
@Mico, done! Thank you very much!
– Zarko
May 27 at 11:33
add a comment
|
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "85"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/"u003ecc by-sa 4.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f492822%2fbreak-equation-in-parts%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
You overuse parentheses. If I've well understood your formula, here is a layout which fits on two lines, with the geometry
package, to have more decent margins. Also, I prefer to use the medium-size fractions from nccmath
for fractionary coefficients:
documentclass{article}
usepackage[showframe]{geometry}
usepackage{amsmath, nccmath}
DeclareMathOperator{E}{E}
begin{document}
vspace*{2ex}
begin{multline*}
P_t=
mfrac{1}{2}biggl(m_t+v_t-u_t
+frac{1-zeta }{2},frac{E_{t-1}m_t+frac{1-zeta }{2zeta }E_{t-2}m_t+frac{zeta (1-zeta )}{2(1+zeta )}E_{t-2}P_{t-1}+frac{zeta }{2}P_{t-1} +frac{zeta }{1+zeta }P_{t-2}}{1+zeta}biggr) \
+frac{1-zeta }{4},frac{E_{t-2}m_t+frac{zeta }{2}(E_{t-2}P_{t-1}+P_{t-2})}{1+zeta} +frac{zeta }{4}(P_{t-1}+P_{t-2})
end{multline*}
end{document}
Thanks, I got my mistake.
– Henam
May 27 at 9:48
1
I think you should replaceP_t
withP_t
... And, since the preamble features the instructionDeclareMathOperator{E}{E}
, you may also want to replace all intstances ofE
in the mathy material withE
.
– Mico
May 27 at 10:57
Before suggesting making "more decent margins", please consider the final destination of the document. If it's submitted for publication in a journal, and the page size of the journal is too narrow to accommodate the display, you run the risk of having changes made in the editorial process possibly leading to a change in meaning or actual errors. Such formatting adjustments are much better made by the author.
– barbara beeton
May 27 at 11:53
@barbarabeeton: You're right, I should have added 'if wide margins are not required'. I'm not sure most people really need these very wide margins, unless they use marginal notes.
– Bernard
May 27 at 13:05
add a comment
|
You overuse parentheses. If I've well understood your formula, here is a layout which fits on two lines, with the geometry
package, to have more decent margins. Also, I prefer to use the medium-size fractions from nccmath
for fractionary coefficients:
documentclass{article}
usepackage[showframe]{geometry}
usepackage{amsmath, nccmath}
DeclareMathOperator{E}{E}
begin{document}
vspace*{2ex}
begin{multline*}
P_t=
mfrac{1}{2}biggl(m_t+v_t-u_t
+frac{1-zeta }{2},frac{E_{t-1}m_t+frac{1-zeta }{2zeta }E_{t-2}m_t+frac{zeta (1-zeta )}{2(1+zeta )}E_{t-2}P_{t-1}+frac{zeta }{2}P_{t-1} +frac{zeta }{1+zeta }P_{t-2}}{1+zeta}biggr) \
+frac{1-zeta }{4},frac{E_{t-2}m_t+frac{zeta }{2}(E_{t-2}P_{t-1}+P_{t-2})}{1+zeta} +frac{zeta }{4}(P_{t-1}+P_{t-2})
end{multline*}
end{document}
Thanks, I got my mistake.
– Henam
May 27 at 9:48
1
I think you should replaceP_t
withP_t
... And, since the preamble features the instructionDeclareMathOperator{E}{E}
, you may also want to replace all intstances ofE
in the mathy material withE
.
– Mico
May 27 at 10:57
Before suggesting making "more decent margins", please consider the final destination of the document. If it's submitted for publication in a journal, and the page size of the journal is too narrow to accommodate the display, you run the risk of having changes made in the editorial process possibly leading to a change in meaning or actual errors. Such formatting adjustments are much better made by the author.
– barbara beeton
May 27 at 11:53
@barbarabeeton: You're right, I should have added 'if wide margins are not required'. I'm not sure most people really need these very wide margins, unless they use marginal notes.
– Bernard
May 27 at 13:05
add a comment
|
You overuse parentheses. If I've well understood your formula, here is a layout which fits on two lines, with the geometry
package, to have more decent margins. Also, I prefer to use the medium-size fractions from nccmath
for fractionary coefficients:
documentclass{article}
usepackage[showframe]{geometry}
usepackage{amsmath, nccmath}
DeclareMathOperator{E}{E}
begin{document}
vspace*{2ex}
begin{multline*}
P_t=
mfrac{1}{2}biggl(m_t+v_t-u_t
+frac{1-zeta }{2},frac{E_{t-1}m_t+frac{1-zeta }{2zeta }E_{t-2}m_t+frac{zeta (1-zeta )}{2(1+zeta )}E_{t-2}P_{t-1}+frac{zeta }{2}P_{t-1} +frac{zeta }{1+zeta }P_{t-2}}{1+zeta}biggr) \
+frac{1-zeta }{4},frac{E_{t-2}m_t+frac{zeta }{2}(E_{t-2}P_{t-1}+P_{t-2})}{1+zeta} +frac{zeta }{4}(P_{t-1}+P_{t-2})
end{multline*}
end{document}
You overuse parentheses. If I've well understood your formula, here is a layout which fits on two lines, with the geometry
package, to have more decent margins. Also, I prefer to use the medium-size fractions from nccmath
for fractionary coefficients:
documentclass{article}
usepackage[showframe]{geometry}
usepackage{amsmath, nccmath}
DeclareMathOperator{E}{E}
begin{document}
vspace*{2ex}
begin{multline*}
P_t=
mfrac{1}{2}biggl(m_t+v_t-u_t
+frac{1-zeta }{2},frac{E_{t-1}m_t+frac{1-zeta }{2zeta }E_{t-2}m_t+frac{zeta (1-zeta )}{2(1+zeta )}E_{t-2}P_{t-1}+frac{zeta }{2}P_{t-1} +frac{zeta }{1+zeta }P_{t-2}}{1+zeta}biggr) \
+frac{1-zeta }{4},frac{E_{t-2}m_t+frac{zeta }{2}(E_{t-2}P_{t-1}+P_{t-2})}{1+zeta} +frac{zeta }{4}(P_{t-1}+P_{t-2})
end{multline*}
end{document}
answered May 27 at 8:32
BernardBernard
192k8 gold badges86 silver badges230 bronze badges
192k8 gold badges86 silver badges230 bronze badges
Thanks, I got my mistake.
– Henam
May 27 at 9:48
1
I think you should replaceP_t
withP_t
... And, since the preamble features the instructionDeclareMathOperator{E}{E}
, you may also want to replace all intstances ofE
in the mathy material withE
.
– Mico
May 27 at 10:57
Before suggesting making "more decent margins", please consider the final destination of the document. If it's submitted for publication in a journal, and the page size of the journal is too narrow to accommodate the display, you run the risk of having changes made in the editorial process possibly leading to a change in meaning or actual errors. Such formatting adjustments are much better made by the author.
– barbara beeton
May 27 at 11:53
@barbarabeeton: You're right, I should have added 'if wide margins are not required'. I'm not sure most people really need these very wide margins, unless they use marginal notes.
– Bernard
May 27 at 13:05
add a comment
|
Thanks, I got my mistake.
– Henam
May 27 at 9:48
1
I think you should replaceP_t
withP_t
... And, since the preamble features the instructionDeclareMathOperator{E}{E}
, you may also want to replace all intstances ofE
in the mathy material withE
.
– Mico
May 27 at 10:57
Before suggesting making "more decent margins", please consider the final destination of the document. If it's submitted for publication in a journal, and the page size of the journal is too narrow to accommodate the display, you run the risk of having changes made in the editorial process possibly leading to a change in meaning or actual errors. Such formatting adjustments are much better made by the author.
– barbara beeton
May 27 at 11:53
@barbarabeeton: You're right, I should have added 'if wide margins are not required'. I'm not sure most people really need these very wide margins, unless they use marginal notes.
– Bernard
May 27 at 13:05
Thanks, I got my mistake.
– Henam
May 27 at 9:48
Thanks, I got my mistake.
– Henam
May 27 at 9:48
1
1
I think you should replace
P_t
with P_t
... And, since the preamble features the instruction DeclareMathOperator{E}{E}
, you may also want to replace all intstances of E
in the mathy material with E
.– Mico
May 27 at 10:57
I think you should replace
P_t
with P_t
... And, since the preamble features the instruction DeclareMathOperator{E}{E}
, you may also want to replace all intstances of E
in the mathy material with E
.– Mico
May 27 at 10:57
Before suggesting making "more decent margins", please consider the final destination of the document. If it's submitted for publication in a journal, and the page size of the journal is too narrow to accommodate the display, you run the risk of having changes made in the editorial process possibly leading to a change in meaning or actual errors. Such formatting adjustments are much better made by the author.
– barbara beeton
May 27 at 11:53
Before suggesting making "more decent margins", please consider the final destination of the document. If it's submitted for publication in a journal, and the page size of the journal is too narrow to accommodate the display, you run the risk of having changes made in the editorial process possibly leading to a change in meaning or actual errors. Such formatting adjustments are much better made by the author.
– barbara beeton
May 27 at 11:53
@barbarabeeton: You're right, I should have added 'if wide margins are not required'. I'm not sure most people really need these very wide margins, unless they use marginal notes.
– Bernard
May 27 at 13:05
@barbarabeeton: You're right, I should have added 'if wide margins are not required'. I'm not sure most people really need these very wide margins, unless they use marginal notes.
– Bernard
May 27 at 13:05
add a comment
|
I would simplify the formula first and then typeset it across three rows using an align*
environment.
documentclass{article}
usepackage{amsmath}
DeclareMathOperator{E}{E} % expectations operator
begin{document}
begin{align*}
P_t
&=frac{1}{2}(m_t+v_t-u_t)
+frac{1}{4}frac{1-zeta}{1+zeta}
biggl[E_{t-1}m_t +frac{1-zeta}{2zeta }E_{t-2}m_t\
&quad +frac{zeta (1-zeta)}{2(1+zeta)}E_{t-2}P_{t-1}
+frac{zeta}{2}P_{t-1}+frac{zeta}{1+zeta }P_{t-2}
+E_{t-2}m_t\
&quad +frac{zeta}{2} (E_{t-2}P_{t-1}+P_{t-2})biggr]
+frac{1}{4}zeta (P_{t-1}+P_{t-2})
end{align*}
end{document}
1
That's a really cool way to represent it. Didn't think of it, thanks a lot!
– Henam
May 27 at 11:25
add a comment
|
I would simplify the formula first and then typeset it across three rows using an align*
environment.
documentclass{article}
usepackage{amsmath}
DeclareMathOperator{E}{E} % expectations operator
begin{document}
begin{align*}
P_t
&=frac{1}{2}(m_t+v_t-u_t)
+frac{1}{4}frac{1-zeta}{1+zeta}
biggl[E_{t-1}m_t +frac{1-zeta}{2zeta }E_{t-2}m_t\
&quad +frac{zeta (1-zeta)}{2(1+zeta)}E_{t-2}P_{t-1}
+frac{zeta}{2}P_{t-1}+frac{zeta}{1+zeta }P_{t-2}
+E_{t-2}m_t\
&quad +frac{zeta}{2} (E_{t-2}P_{t-1}+P_{t-2})biggr]
+frac{1}{4}zeta (P_{t-1}+P_{t-2})
end{align*}
end{document}
1
That's a really cool way to represent it. Didn't think of it, thanks a lot!
– Henam
May 27 at 11:25
add a comment
|
I would simplify the formula first and then typeset it across three rows using an align*
environment.
documentclass{article}
usepackage{amsmath}
DeclareMathOperator{E}{E} % expectations operator
begin{document}
begin{align*}
P_t
&=frac{1}{2}(m_t+v_t-u_t)
+frac{1}{4}frac{1-zeta}{1+zeta}
biggl[E_{t-1}m_t +frac{1-zeta}{2zeta }E_{t-2}m_t\
&quad +frac{zeta (1-zeta)}{2(1+zeta)}E_{t-2}P_{t-1}
+frac{zeta}{2}P_{t-1}+frac{zeta}{1+zeta }P_{t-2}
+E_{t-2}m_t\
&quad +frac{zeta}{2} (E_{t-2}P_{t-1}+P_{t-2})biggr]
+frac{1}{4}zeta (P_{t-1}+P_{t-2})
end{align*}
end{document}
I would simplify the formula first and then typeset it across three rows using an align*
environment.
documentclass{article}
usepackage{amsmath}
DeclareMathOperator{E}{E} % expectations operator
begin{document}
begin{align*}
P_t
&=frac{1}{2}(m_t+v_t-u_t)
+frac{1}{4}frac{1-zeta}{1+zeta}
biggl[E_{t-1}m_t +frac{1-zeta}{2zeta }E_{t-2}m_t\
&quad +frac{zeta (1-zeta)}{2(1+zeta)}E_{t-2}P_{t-1}
+frac{zeta}{2}P_{t-1}+frac{zeta}{1+zeta }P_{t-2}
+E_{t-2}m_t\
&quad +frac{zeta}{2} (E_{t-2}P_{t-1}+P_{t-2})biggr]
+frac{1}{4}zeta (P_{t-1}+P_{t-2})
end{align*}
end{document}
answered May 27 at 11:23
MicoMico
306k33 gold badges422 silver badges834 bronze badges
306k33 gold badges422 silver badges834 bronze badges
1
That's a really cool way to represent it. Didn't think of it, thanks a lot!
– Henam
May 27 at 11:25
add a comment
|
1
That's a really cool way to represent it. Didn't think of it, thanks a lot!
– Henam
May 27 at 11:25
1
1
That's a really cool way to represent it. Didn't think of it, thanks a lot!
– Henam
May 27 at 11:25
That's a really cool way to represent it. Didn't think of it, thanks a lot!
– Henam
May 27 at 11:25
add a comment
|
After removing all unnecessary brackets, correcting size of used ones, with use nccmath
for medium size fractions and changed lines of equation:
documentclass{article}
usepackage{nccmath}
%---------------- show page layout. don't use in a real document!
usepackage{showframe}
renewcommandShowFrameLinethickness{0.15pt}
renewcommand*ShowFrameColor{color{red}}
begin{document}
begin{multline*}
P_t=
frac{1}{2}Biggl(m_t+v_t-u_t \
+ frac{1-zeta }{2}frac{E_{t-1}m_t
+ mfrac{1-zeta}{2zeta}E_{t-2}m_t
+ mfrac{zeta(1-zeta)}{2(1+zeta)}E_{t-2}P_{t-1}
+ mfrac{zeta}{2}P_{t-1}
+ mfrac{zeta}{1+zeta}P_{t-2}}
{1+zeta}Biggr) \
+ frac{1-zeta}{4}
frac{E_{t-2}m_t + frac{zeta}{2}(E_{t-2}P_{t-1}
+ P_{t-2})}{1+zeta}
+ frac{zeta }{4}Bigl(P_{t-1}+P_{t-2}Bigr)
end{multline*}
end{document}
(red lines indicate text borders)
Thanks a lot, it clearly answers my question.
– Henam
May 27 at 9:47
I would replacePi_t
withP_t
...
– Mico
May 27 at 11:19
@Mico, done! Thank you very much!
– Zarko
May 27 at 11:33
add a comment
|
After removing all unnecessary brackets, correcting size of used ones, with use nccmath
for medium size fractions and changed lines of equation:
documentclass{article}
usepackage{nccmath}
%---------------- show page layout. don't use in a real document!
usepackage{showframe}
renewcommandShowFrameLinethickness{0.15pt}
renewcommand*ShowFrameColor{color{red}}
begin{document}
begin{multline*}
P_t=
frac{1}{2}Biggl(m_t+v_t-u_t \
+ frac{1-zeta }{2}frac{E_{t-1}m_t
+ mfrac{1-zeta}{2zeta}E_{t-2}m_t
+ mfrac{zeta(1-zeta)}{2(1+zeta)}E_{t-2}P_{t-1}
+ mfrac{zeta}{2}P_{t-1}
+ mfrac{zeta}{1+zeta}P_{t-2}}
{1+zeta}Biggr) \
+ frac{1-zeta}{4}
frac{E_{t-2}m_t + frac{zeta}{2}(E_{t-2}P_{t-1}
+ P_{t-2})}{1+zeta}
+ frac{zeta }{4}Bigl(P_{t-1}+P_{t-2}Bigr)
end{multline*}
end{document}
(red lines indicate text borders)
Thanks a lot, it clearly answers my question.
– Henam
May 27 at 9:47
I would replacePi_t
withP_t
...
– Mico
May 27 at 11:19
@Mico, done! Thank you very much!
– Zarko
May 27 at 11:33
add a comment
|
After removing all unnecessary brackets, correcting size of used ones, with use nccmath
for medium size fractions and changed lines of equation:
documentclass{article}
usepackage{nccmath}
%---------------- show page layout. don't use in a real document!
usepackage{showframe}
renewcommandShowFrameLinethickness{0.15pt}
renewcommand*ShowFrameColor{color{red}}
begin{document}
begin{multline*}
P_t=
frac{1}{2}Biggl(m_t+v_t-u_t \
+ frac{1-zeta }{2}frac{E_{t-1}m_t
+ mfrac{1-zeta}{2zeta}E_{t-2}m_t
+ mfrac{zeta(1-zeta)}{2(1+zeta)}E_{t-2}P_{t-1}
+ mfrac{zeta}{2}P_{t-1}
+ mfrac{zeta}{1+zeta}P_{t-2}}
{1+zeta}Biggr) \
+ frac{1-zeta}{4}
frac{E_{t-2}m_t + frac{zeta}{2}(E_{t-2}P_{t-1}
+ P_{t-2})}{1+zeta}
+ frac{zeta }{4}Bigl(P_{t-1}+P_{t-2}Bigr)
end{multline*}
end{document}
(red lines indicate text borders)
After removing all unnecessary brackets, correcting size of used ones, with use nccmath
for medium size fractions and changed lines of equation:
documentclass{article}
usepackage{nccmath}
%---------------- show page layout. don't use in a real document!
usepackage{showframe}
renewcommandShowFrameLinethickness{0.15pt}
renewcommand*ShowFrameColor{color{red}}
begin{document}
begin{multline*}
P_t=
frac{1}{2}Biggl(m_t+v_t-u_t \
+ frac{1-zeta }{2}frac{E_{t-1}m_t
+ mfrac{1-zeta}{2zeta}E_{t-2}m_t
+ mfrac{zeta(1-zeta)}{2(1+zeta)}E_{t-2}P_{t-1}
+ mfrac{zeta}{2}P_{t-1}
+ mfrac{zeta}{1+zeta}P_{t-2}}
{1+zeta}Biggr) \
+ frac{1-zeta}{4}
frac{E_{t-2}m_t + frac{zeta}{2}(E_{t-2}P_{t-1}
+ P_{t-2})}{1+zeta}
+ frac{zeta }{4}Bigl(P_{t-1}+P_{t-2}Bigr)
end{multline*}
end{document}
(red lines indicate text borders)
edited May 27 at 11:32
answered May 27 at 8:20
ZarkoZarko
148k8 gold badges85 silver badges195 bronze badges
148k8 gold badges85 silver badges195 bronze badges
Thanks a lot, it clearly answers my question.
– Henam
May 27 at 9:47
I would replacePi_t
withP_t
...
– Mico
May 27 at 11:19
@Mico, done! Thank you very much!
– Zarko
May 27 at 11:33
add a comment
|
Thanks a lot, it clearly answers my question.
– Henam
May 27 at 9:47
I would replacePi_t
withP_t
...
– Mico
May 27 at 11:19
@Mico, done! Thank you very much!
– Zarko
May 27 at 11:33
Thanks a lot, it clearly answers my question.
– Henam
May 27 at 9:47
Thanks a lot, it clearly answers my question.
– Henam
May 27 at 9:47
I would replace
Pi_t
with P_t
...– Mico
May 27 at 11:19
I would replace
Pi_t
with P_t
...– Mico
May 27 at 11:19
@Mico, done! Thank you very much!
– Zarko
May 27 at 11:33
@Mico, done! Thank you very much!
– Zarko
May 27 at 11:33
add a comment
|
Thanks for contributing an answer to TeX - LaTeX Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f492822%2fbreak-equation-in-parts%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
1
)bigr\
is applying bigr to\
presumably you intendedbigr)\
– David Carlisle
May 27 at 7:34
I suggest you use the chktex program, which should be included in your distribution, to find unbalanced pairs of parentheses.
– Andrew Swann
May 27 at 8:18