Break equation in parts





.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty{
margin-bottom:0;
}








5















I want to break this equation in multi-line but unable to get it!



documentclass{article}
usepackage{amsmath}
DeclareMathOperator{E}{E}
begin{document}
begin{multline*}
P_t=
frac{1}{2}Bigl(m_t+v_t-u_t
+(frac{1-zeta }{2})(frac{E_{t-1}m_t+frac{1-zeta }{2zeta }E_{t-
2}m_t+frac{zeta (1-zeta )}{2(1+zeta )}E_{t-2}P_{t-1}+frac{zeta }
{2}P_{t-1}+frac{zeta }{1+zeta }P_{t-2}}{(1+zeta )}))bigr\
+frac{(1-zeta )}{4}Bigl(frac{E_{t-2}m_t+(frac{zeta }{2})(E_{t-2}P_{t-
1}+P_{t-2})}{(1+zeta )})Bigr) \
+frac{zeta }{4}(Bigl((P_{t-1}+P_{t-2})Bigr)
end{multline*}
end{document}


It's getting out of the mage, so I tired to break it but still it's not showing the correct showing. Can anyone help to identify the problem in coding? How to use breqn?










share|improve this question






















  • 1





    )bigr\ is applying bigr to \ presumably you intended bigr)\

    – David Carlisle
    May 27 at 7:34













  • I suggest you use the chktex program, which should be included in your distribution, to find unbalanced pairs of parentheses.

    – Andrew Swann
    May 27 at 8:18


















5















I want to break this equation in multi-line but unable to get it!



documentclass{article}
usepackage{amsmath}
DeclareMathOperator{E}{E}
begin{document}
begin{multline*}
P_t=
frac{1}{2}Bigl(m_t+v_t-u_t
+(frac{1-zeta }{2})(frac{E_{t-1}m_t+frac{1-zeta }{2zeta }E_{t-
2}m_t+frac{zeta (1-zeta )}{2(1+zeta )}E_{t-2}P_{t-1}+frac{zeta }
{2}P_{t-1}+frac{zeta }{1+zeta }P_{t-2}}{(1+zeta )}))bigr\
+frac{(1-zeta )}{4}Bigl(frac{E_{t-2}m_t+(frac{zeta }{2})(E_{t-2}P_{t-
1}+P_{t-2})}{(1+zeta )})Bigr) \
+frac{zeta }{4}(Bigl((P_{t-1}+P_{t-2})Bigr)
end{multline*}
end{document}


It's getting out of the mage, so I tired to break it but still it's not showing the correct showing. Can anyone help to identify the problem in coding? How to use breqn?










share|improve this question






















  • 1





    )bigr\ is applying bigr to \ presumably you intended bigr)\

    – David Carlisle
    May 27 at 7:34













  • I suggest you use the chktex program, which should be included in your distribution, to find unbalanced pairs of parentheses.

    – Andrew Swann
    May 27 at 8:18














5












5








5


1






I want to break this equation in multi-line but unable to get it!



documentclass{article}
usepackage{amsmath}
DeclareMathOperator{E}{E}
begin{document}
begin{multline*}
P_t=
frac{1}{2}Bigl(m_t+v_t-u_t
+(frac{1-zeta }{2})(frac{E_{t-1}m_t+frac{1-zeta }{2zeta }E_{t-
2}m_t+frac{zeta (1-zeta )}{2(1+zeta )}E_{t-2}P_{t-1}+frac{zeta }
{2}P_{t-1}+frac{zeta }{1+zeta }P_{t-2}}{(1+zeta )}))bigr\
+frac{(1-zeta )}{4}Bigl(frac{E_{t-2}m_t+(frac{zeta }{2})(E_{t-2}P_{t-
1}+P_{t-2})}{(1+zeta )})Bigr) \
+frac{zeta }{4}(Bigl((P_{t-1}+P_{t-2})Bigr)
end{multline*}
end{document}


It's getting out of the mage, so I tired to break it but still it's not showing the correct showing. Can anyone help to identify the problem in coding? How to use breqn?










share|improve this question
















I want to break this equation in multi-line but unable to get it!



documentclass{article}
usepackage{amsmath}
DeclareMathOperator{E}{E}
begin{document}
begin{multline*}
P_t=
frac{1}{2}Bigl(m_t+v_t-u_t
+(frac{1-zeta }{2})(frac{E_{t-1}m_t+frac{1-zeta }{2zeta }E_{t-
2}m_t+frac{zeta (1-zeta )}{2(1+zeta )}E_{t-2}P_{t-1}+frac{zeta }
{2}P_{t-1}+frac{zeta }{1+zeta }P_{t-2}}{(1+zeta )}))bigr\
+frac{(1-zeta )}{4}Bigl(frac{E_{t-2}m_t+(frac{zeta }{2})(E_{t-2}P_{t-
1}+P_{t-2})}{(1+zeta )})Bigr) \
+frac{zeta }{4}(Bigl((P_{t-1}+P_{t-2})Bigr)
end{multline*}
end{document}


It's getting out of the mage, so I tired to break it but still it's not showing the correct showing. Can anyone help to identify the problem in coding? How to use breqn?







equations amsmath






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited May 27 at 8:12









Andrew Swann

81.6k9 gold badges142 silver badges347 bronze badges




81.6k9 gold badges142 silver badges347 bronze badges










asked May 27 at 7:25









HenamHenam

965 bronze badges




965 bronze badges











  • 1





    )bigr\ is applying bigr to \ presumably you intended bigr)\

    – David Carlisle
    May 27 at 7:34













  • I suggest you use the chktex program, which should be included in your distribution, to find unbalanced pairs of parentheses.

    – Andrew Swann
    May 27 at 8:18














  • 1





    )bigr\ is applying bigr to \ presumably you intended bigr)\

    – David Carlisle
    May 27 at 7:34













  • I suggest you use the chktex program, which should be included in your distribution, to find unbalanced pairs of parentheses.

    – Andrew Swann
    May 27 at 8:18








1




1





)bigr\ is applying bigr to \ presumably you intended bigr)\

– David Carlisle
May 27 at 7:34







)bigr\ is applying bigr to \ presumably you intended bigr)\

– David Carlisle
May 27 at 7:34















I suggest you use the chktex program, which should be included in your distribution, to find unbalanced pairs of parentheses.

– Andrew Swann
May 27 at 8:18





I suggest you use the chktex program, which should be included in your distribution, to find unbalanced pairs of parentheses.

– Andrew Swann
May 27 at 8:18










3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes


















1
















You overuse parentheses. If I've well understood your formula, here is a layout which fits on two lines, with the geometry package, to have more decent margins. Also, I prefer to use the medium-size fractions from nccmath for fractionary coefficients:



documentclass{article}
usepackage[showframe]{geometry}
usepackage{amsmath, nccmath}
DeclareMathOperator{E}{E}

begin{document}
vspace*{2ex}
begin{multline*}
P_t=
mfrac{1}{2}biggl(m_t+v_t-u_t
+frac{1-zeta }{2},frac{E_{t-1}m_t+frac{1-zeta }{2zeta }E_{t-2}m_t+frac{zeta (1-zeta )}{2(1+zeta )}E_{t-2}P_{t-1}+frac{zeta }{2}P_{t-1} +frac{zeta }{1+zeta }P_{t-2}}{1+zeta}biggr) \
+frac{1-zeta }{4},frac{E_{t-2}m_t+frac{zeta }{2}(E_{t-2}P_{t-1}+P_{t-2})}{1+zeta} +frac{zeta }{4}(P_{t-1}+P_{t-2})
end{multline*}

end{document}


enter image description here






share|improve this answer


























  • Thanks, I got my mistake.

    – Henam
    May 27 at 9:48






  • 1





    I think you should replace P_t with P_t... And, since the preamble features the instruction DeclareMathOperator{E}{E}, you may also want to replace all intstances of E in the mathy material with E.

    – Mico
    May 27 at 10:57













  • Before suggesting making "more decent margins", please consider the final destination of the document. If it's submitted for publication in a journal, and the page size of the journal is too narrow to accommodate the display, you run the risk of having changes made in the editorial process possibly leading to a change in meaning or actual errors. Such formatting adjustments are much better made by the author.

    – barbara beeton
    May 27 at 11:53











  • @barbarabeeton: You're right, I should have added 'if wide margins are not required'. I'm not sure most people really need these very wide margins, unless they use marginal notes.

    – Bernard
    May 27 at 13:05



















4
















I would simplify the formula first and then typeset it across three rows using an align* environment.



enter image description here



documentclass{article}
usepackage{amsmath}
DeclareMathOperator{E}{E} % expectations operator

begin{document}
begin{align*}
P_t
&=frac{1}{2}(m_t+v_t-u_t)
+frac{1}{4}frac{1-zeta}{1+zeta}
biggl[E_{t-1}m_t +frac{1-zeta}{2zeta }E_{t-2}m_t\
&quad +frac{zeta (1-zeta)}{2(1+zeta)}E_{t-2}P_{t-1}
+frac{zeta}{2}P_{t-1}+frac{zeta}{1+zeta }P_{t-2}
+E_{t-2}m_t\
&quad +frac{zeta}{2} (E_{t-2}P_{t-1}+P_{t-2})biggr]
+frac{1}{4}zeta (P_{t-1}+P_{t-2})
end{align*}
end{document}





share|improve this answer





















  • 1





    That's a really cool way to represent it. Didn't think of it, thanks a lot!

    – Henam
    May 27 at 11:25



















4
















After removing all unnecessary brackets, correcting size of used ones, with use nccmath for medium size fractions and changed lines of equation:



documentclass{article}
usepackage{nccmath}
%---------------- show page layout. don't use in a real document!
usepackage{showframe}
renewcommandShowFrameLinethickness{0.15pt}
renewcommand*ShowFrameColor{color{red}}

begin{document}
begin{multline*}
P_t=
frac{1}{2}Biggl(m_t+v_t-u_t \
+ frac{1-zeta }{2}frac{E_{t-1}m_t
+ mfrac{1-zeta}{2zeta}E_{t-2}m_t
+ mfrac{zeta(1-zeta)}{2(1+zeta)}E_{t-2}P_{t-1}
+ mfrac{zeta}{2}P_{t-1}
+ mfrac{zeta}{1+zeta}P_{t-2}}
{1+zeta}Biggr) \
+ frac{1-zeta}{4}
frac{E_{t-2}m_t + frac{zeta}{2}(E_{t-2}P_{t-1}
+ P_{t-2})}{1+zeta}
+ frac{zeta }{4}Bigl(P_{t-1}+P_{t-2}Bigr)
end{multline*}
end{document}


enter image description here



(red lines indicate text borders)






share|improve this answer




























  • Thanks a lot, it clearly answers my question.

    – Henam
    May 27 at 9:47











  • I would replace Pi_t with P_t...

    – Mico
    May 27 at 11:19













  • @Mico, done! Thank you very much!

    – Zarko
    May 27 at 11:33













Your Answer








StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "85"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/"u003ecc by-sa 4.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});















draft saved

draft discarded
















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f492822%2fbreak-equation-in-parts%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes








3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









1
















You overuse parentheses. If I've well understood your formula, here is a layout which fits on two lines, with the geometry package, to have more decent margins. Also, I prefer to use the medium-size fractions from nccmath for fractionary coefficients:



documentclass{article}
usepackage[showframe]{geometry}
usepackage{amsmath, nccmath}
DeclareMathOperator{E}{E}

begin{document}
vspace*{2ex}
begin{multline*}
P_t=
mfrac{1}{2}biggl(m_t+v_t-u_t
+frac{1-zeta }{2},frac{E_{t-1}m_t+frac{1-zeta }{2zeta }E_{t-2}m_t+frac{zeta (1-zeta )}{2(1+zeta )}E_{t-2}P_{t-1}+frac{zeta }{2}P_{t-1} +frac{zeta }{1+zeta }P_{t-2}}{1+zeta}biggr) \
+frac{1-zeta }{4},frac{E_{t-2}m_t+frac{zeta }{2}(E_{t-2}P_{t-1}+P_{t-2})}{1+zeta} +frac{zeta }{4}(P_{t-1}+P_{t-2})
end{multline*}

end{document}


enter image description here






share|improve this answer


























  • Thanks, I got my mistake.

    – Henam
    May 27 at 9:48






  • 1





    I think you should replace P_t with P_t... And, since the preamble features the instruction DeclareMathOperator{E}{E}, you may also want to replace all intstances of E in the mathy material with E.

    – Mico
    May 27 at 10:57













  • Before suggesting making "more decent margins", please consider the final destination of the document. If it's submitted for publication in a journal, and the page size of the journal is too narrow to accommodate the display, you run the risk of having changes made in the editorial process possibly leading to a change in meaning or actual errors. Such formatting adjustments are much better made by the author.

    – barbara beeton
    May 27 at 11:53











  • @barbarabeeton: You're right, I should have added 'if wide margins are not required'. I'm not sure most people really need these very wide margins, unless they use marginal notes.

    – Bernard
    May 27 at 13:05
















1
















You overuse parentheses. If I've well understood your formula, here is a layout which fits on two lines, with the geometry package, to have more decent margins. Also, I prefer to use the medium-size fractions from nccmath for fractionary coefficients:



documentclass{article}
usepackage[showframe]{geometry}
usepackage{amsmath, nccmath}
DeclareMathOperator{E}{E}

begin{document}
vspace*{2ex}
begin{multline*}
P_t=
mfrac{1}{2}biggl(m_t+v_t-u_t
+frac{1-zeta }{2},frac{E_{t-1}m_t+frac{1-zeta }{2zeta }E_{t-2}m_t+frac{zeta (1-zeta )}{2(1+zeta )}E_{t-2}P_{t-1}+frac{zeta }{2}P_{t-1} +frac{zeta }{1+zeta }P_{t-2}}{1+zeta}biggr) \
+frac{1-zeta }{4},frac{E_{t-2}m_t+frac{zeta }{2}(E_{t-2}P_{t-1}+P_{t-2})}{1+zeta} +frac{zeta }{4}(P_{t-1}+P_{t-2})
end{multline*}

end{document}


enter image description here






share|improve this answer


























  • Thanks, I got my mistake.

    – Henam
    May 27 at 9:48






  • 1





    I think you should replace P_t with P_t... And, since the preamble features the instruction DeclareMathOperator{E}{E}, you may also want to replace all intstances of E in the mathy material with E.

    – Mico
    May 27 at 10:57













  • Before suggesting making "more decent margins", please consider the final destination of the document. If it's submitted for publication in a journal, and the page size of the journal is too narrow to accommodate the display, you run the risk of having changes made in the editorial process possibly leading to a change in meaning or actual errors. Such formatting adjustments are much better made by the author.

    – barbara beeton
    May 27 at 11:53











  • @barbarabeeton: You're right, I should have added 'if wide margins are not required'. I'm not sure most people really need these very wide margins, unless they use marginal notes.

    – Bernard
    May 27 at 13:05














1














1










1









You overuse parentheses. If I've well understood your formula, here is a layout which fits on two lines, with the geometry package, to have more decent margins. Also, I prefer to use the medium-size fractions from nccmath for fractionary coefficients:



documentclass{article}
usepackage[showframe]{geometry}
usepackage{amsmath, nccmath}
DeclareMathOperator{E}{E}

begin{document}
vspace*{2ex}
begin{multline*}
P_t=
mfrac{1}{2}biggl(m_t+v_t-u_t
+frac{1-zeta }{2},frac{E_{t-1}m_t+frac{1-zeta }{2zeta }E_{t-2}m_t+frac{zeta (1-zeta )}{2(1+zeta )}E_{t-2}P_{t-1}+frac{zeta }{2}P_{t-1} +frac{zeta }{1+zeta }P_{t-2}}{1+zeta}biggr) \
+frac{1-zeta }{4},frac{E_{t-2}m_t+frac{zeta }{2}(E_{t-2}P_{t-1}+P_{t-2})}{1+zeta} +frac{zeta }{4}(P_{t-1}+P_{t-2})
end{multline*}

end{document}


enter image description here






share|improve this answer













You overuse parentheses. If I've well understood your formula, here is a layout which fits on two lines, with the geometry package, to have more decent margins. Also, I prefer to use the medium-size fractions from nccmath for fractionary coefficients:



documentclass{article}
usepackage[showframe]{geometry}
usepackage{amsmath, nccmath}
DeclareMathOperator{E}{E}

begin{document}
vspace*{2ex}
begin{multline*}
P_t=
mfrac{1}{2}biggl(m_t+v_t-u_t
+frac{1-zeta }{2},frac{E_{t-1}m_t+frac{1-zeta }{2zeta }E_{t-2}m_t+frac{zeta (1-zeta )}{2(1+zeta )}E_{t-2}P_{t-1}+frac{zeta }{2}P_{t-1} +frac{zeta }{1+zeta }P_{t-2}}{1+zeta}biggr) \
+frac{1-zeta }{4},frac{E_{t-2}m_t+frac{zeta }{2}(E_{t-2}P_{t-1}+P_{t-2})}{1+zeta} +frac{zeta }{4}(P_{t-1}+P_{t-2})
end{multline*}

end{document}


enter image description here







share|improve this answer












share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer










answered May 27 at 8:32









BernardBernard

192k8 gold badges86 silver badges230 bronze badges




192k8 gold badges86 silver badges230 bronze badges
















  • Thanks, I got my mistake.

    – Henam
    May 27 at 9:48






  • 1





    I think you should replace P_t with P_t... And, since the preamble features the instruction DeclareMathOperator{E}{E}, you may also want to replace all intstances of E in the mathy material with E.

    – Mico
    May 27 at 10:57













  • Before suggesting making "more decent margins", please consider the final destination of the document. If it's submitted for publication in a journal, and the page size of the journal is too narrow to accommodate the display, you run the risk of having changes made in the editorial process possibly leading to a change in meaning or actual errors. Such formatting adjustments are much better made by the author.

    – barbara beeton
    May 27 at 11:53











  • @barbarabeeton: You're right, I should have added 'if wide margins are not required'. I'm not sure most people really need these very wide margins, unless they use marginal notes.

    – Bernard
    May 27 at 13:05



















  • Thanks, I got my mistake.

    – Henam
    May 27 at 9:48






  • 1





    I think you should replace P_t with P_t... And, since the preamble features the instruction DeclareMathOperator{E}{E}, you may also want to replace all intstances of E in the mathy material with E.

    – Mico
    May 27 at 10:57













  • Before suggesting making "more decent margins", please consider the final destination of the document. If it's submitted for publication in a journal, and the page size of the journal is too narrow to accommodate the display, you run the risk of having changes made in the editorial process possibly leading to a change in meaning or actual errors. Such formatting adjustments are much better made by the author.

    – barbara beeton
    May 27 at 11:53











  • @barbarabeeton: You're right, I should have added 'if wide margins are not required'. I'm not sure most people really need these very wide margins, unless they use marginal notes.

    – Bernard
    May 27 at 13:05

















Thanks, I got my mistake.

– Henam
May 27 at 9:48





Thanks, I got my mistake.

– Henam
May 27 at 9:48




1




1





I think you should replace P_t with P_t... And, since the preamble features the instruction DeclareMathOperator{E}{E}, you may also want to replace all intstances of E in the mathy material with E.

– Mico
May 27 at 10:57







I think you should replace P_t with P_t... And, since the preamble features the instruction DeclareMathOperator{E}{E}, you may also want to replace all intstances of E in the mathy material with E.

– Mico
May 27 at 10:57















Before suggesting making "more decent margins", please consider the final destination of the document. If it's submitted for publication in a journal, and the page size of the journal is too narrow to accommodate the display, you run the risk of having changes made in the editorial process possibly leading to a change in meaning or actual errors. Such formatting adjustments are much better made by the author.

– barbara beeton
May 27 at 11:53





Before suggesting making "more decent margins", please consider the final destination of the document. If it's submitted for publication in a journal, and the page size of the journal is too narrow to accommodate the display, you run the risk of having changes made in the editorial process possibly leading to a change in meaning or actual errors. Such formatting adjustments are much better made by the author.

– barbara beeton
May 27 at 11:53













@barbarabeeton: You're right, I should have added 'if wide margins are not required'. I'm not sure most people really need these very wide margins, unless they use marginal notes.

– Bernard
May 27 at 13:05





@barbarabeeton: You're right, I should have added 'if wide margins are not required'. I'm not sure most people really need these very wide margins, unless they use marginal notes.

– Bernard
May 27 at 13:05













4
















I would simplify the formula first and then typeset it across three rows using an align* environment.



enter image description here



documentclass{article}
usepackage{amsmath}
DeclareMathOperator{E}{E} % expectations operator

begin{document}
begin{align*}
P_t
&=frac{1}{2}(m_t+v_t-u_t)
+frac{1}{4}frac{1-zeta}{1+zeta}
biggl[E_{t-1}m_t +frac{1-zeta}{2zeta }E_{t-2}m_t\
&quad +frac{zeta (1-zeta)}{2(1+zeta)}E_{t-2}P_{t-1}
+frac{zeta}{2}P_{t-1}+frac{zeta}{1+zeta }P_{t-2}
+E_{t-2}m_t\
&quad +frac{zeta}{2} (E_{t-2}P_{t-1}+P_{t-2})biggr]
+frac{1}{4}zeta (P_{t-1}+P_{t-2})
end{align*}
end{document}





share|improve this answer





















  • 1





    That's a really cool way to represent it. Didn't think of it, thanks a lot!

    – Henam
    May 27 at 11:25
















4
















I would simplify the formula first and then typeset it across three rows using an align* environment.



enter image description here



documentclass{article}
usepackage{amsmath}
DeclareMathOperator{E}{E} % expectations operator

begin{document}
begin{align*}
P_t
&=frac{1}{2}(m_t+v_t-u_t)
+frac{1}{4}frac{1-zeta}{1+zeta}
biggl[E_{t-1}m_t +frac{1-zeta}{2zeta }E_{t-2}m_t\
&quad +frac{zeta (1-zeta)}{2(1+zeta)}E_{t-2}P_{t-1}
+frac{zeta}{2}P_{t-1}+frac{zeta}{1+zeta }P_{t-2}
+E_{t-2}m_t\
&quad +frac{zeta}{2} (E_{t-2}P_{t-1}+P_{t-2})biggr]
+frac{1}{4}zeta (P_{t-1}+P_{t-2})
end{align*}
end{document}





share|improve this answer





















  • 1





    That's a really cool way to represent it. Didn't think of it, thanks a lot!

    – Henam
    May 27 at 11:25














4














4










4









I would simplify the formula first and then typeset it across three rows using an align* environment.



enter image description here



documentclass{article}
usepackage{amsmath}
DeclareMathOperator{E}{E} % expectations operator

begin{document}
begin{align*}
P_t
&=frac{1}{2}(m_t+v_t-u_t)
+frac{1}{4}frac{1-zeta}{1+zeta}
biggl[E_{t-1}m_t +frac{1-zeta}{2zeta }E_{t-2}m_t\
&quad +frac{zeta (1-zeta)}{2(1+zeta)}E_{t-2}P_{t-1}
+frac{zeta}{2}P_{t-1}+frac{zeta}{1+zeta }P_{t-2}
+E_{t-2}m_t\
&quad +frac{zeta}{2} (E_{t-2}P_{t-1}+P_{t-2})biggr]
+frac{1}{4}zeta (P_{t-1}+P_{t-2})
end{align*}
end{document}





share|improve this answer













I would simplify the formula first and then typeset it across three rows using an align* environment.



enter image description here



documentclass{article}
usepackage{amsmath}
DeclareMathOperator{E}{E} % expectations operator

begin{document}
begin{align*}
P_t
&=frac{1}{2}(m_t+v_t-u_t)
+frac{1}{4}frac{1-zeta}{1+zeta}
biggl[E_{t-1}m_t +frac{1-zeta}{2zeta }E_{t-2}m_t\
&quad +frac{zeta (1-zeta)}{2(1+zeta)}E_{t-2}P_{t-1}
+frac{zeta}{2}P_{t-1}+frac{zeta}{1+zeta }P_{t-2}
+E_{t-2}m_t\
&quad +frac{zeta}{2} (E_{t-2}P_{t-1}+P_{t-2})biggr]
+frac{1}{4}zeta (P_{t-1}+P_{t-2})
end{align*}
end{document}






share|improve this answer












share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer










answered May 27 at 11:23









MicoMico

306k33 gold badges422 silver badges834 bronze badges




306k33 gold badges422 silver badges834 bronze badges











  • 1





    That's a really cool way to represent it. Didn't think of it, thanks a lot!

    – Henam
    May 27 at 11:25














  • 1





    That's a really cool way to represent it. Didn't think of it, thanks a lot!

    – Henam
    May 27 at 11:25








1




1





That's a really cool way to represent it. Didn't think of it, thanks a lot!

– Henam
May 27 at 11:25





That's a really cool way to represent it. Didn't think of it, thanks a lot!

– Henam
May 27 at 11:25











4
















After removing all unnecessary brackets, correcting size of used ones, with use nccmath for medium size fractions and changed lines of equation:



documentclass{article}
usepackage{nccmath}
%---------------- show page layout. don't use in a real document!
usepackage{showframe}
renewcommandShowFrameLinethickness{0.15pt}
renewcommand*ShowFrameColor{color{red}}

begin{document}
begin{multline*}
P_t=
frac{1}{2}Biggl(m_t+v_t-u_t \
+ frac{1-zeta }{2}frac{E_{t-1}m_t
+ mfrac{1-zeta}{2zeta}E_{t-2}m_t
+ mfrac{zeta(1-zeta)}{2(1+zeta)}E_{t-2}P_{t-1}
+ mfrac{zeta}{2}P_{t-1}
+ mfrac{zeta}{1+zeta}P_{t-2}}
{1+zeta}Biggr) \
+ frac{1-zeta}{4}
frac{E_{t-2}m_t + frac{zeta}{2}(E_{t-2}P_{t-1}
+ P_{t-2})}{1+zeta}
+ frac{zeta }{4}Bigl(P_{t-1}+P_{t-2}Bigr)
end{multline*}
end{document}


enter image description here



(red lines indicate text borders)






share|improve this answer




























  • Thanks a lot, it clearly answers my question.

    – Henam
    May 27 at 9:47











  • I would replace Pi_t with P_t...

    – Mico
    May 27 at 11:19













  • @Mico, done! Thank you very much!

    – Zarko
    May 27 at 11:33
















4
















After removing all unnecessary brackets, correcting size of used ones, with use nccmath for medium size fractions and changed lines of equation:



documentclass{article}
usepackage{nccmath}
%---------------- show page layout. don't use in a real document!
usepackage{showframe}
renewcommandShowFrameLinethickness{0.15pt}
renewcommand*ShowFrameColor{color{red}}

begin{document}
begin{multline*}
P_t=
frac{1}{2}Biggl(m_t+v_t-u_t \
+ frac{1-zeta }{2}frac{E_{t-1}m_t
+ mfrac{1-zeta}{2zeta}E_{t-2}m_t
+ mfrac{zeta(1-zeta)}{2(1+zeta)}E_{t-2}P_{t-1}
+ mfrac{zeta}{2}P_{t-1}
+ mfrac{zeta}{1+zeta}P_{t-2}}
{1+zeta}Biggr) \
+ frac{1-zeta}{4}
frac{E_{t-2}m_t + frac{zeta}{2}(E_{t-2}P_{t-1}
+ P_{t-2})}{1+zeta}
+ frac{zeta }{4}Bigl(P_{t-1}+P_{t-2}Bigr)
end{multline*}
end{document}


enter image description here



(red lines indicate text borders)






share|improve this answer




























  • Thanks a lot, it clearly answers my question.

    – Henam
    May 27 at 9:47











  • I would replace Pi_t with P_t...

    – Mico
    May 27 at 11:19













  • @Mico, done! Thank you very much!

    – Zarko
    May 27 at 11:33














4














4










4









After removing all unnecessary brackets, correcting size of used ones, with use nccmath for medium size fractions and changed lines of equation:



documentclass{article}
usepackage{nccmath}
%---------------- show page layout. don't use in a real document!
usepackage{showframe}
renewcommandShowFrameLinethickness{0.15pt}
renewcommand*ShowFrameColor{color{red}}

begin{document}
begin{multline*}
P_t=
frac{1}{2}Biggl(m_t+v_t-u_t \
+ frac{1-zeta }{2}frac{E_{t-1}m_t
+ mfrac{1-zeta}{2zeta}E_{t-2}m_t
+ mfrac{zeta(1-zeta)}{2(1+zeta)}E_{t-2}P_{t-1}
+ mfrac{zeta}{2}P_{t-1}
+ mfrac{zeta}{1+zeta}P_{t-2}}
{1+zeta}Biggr) \
+ frac{1-zeta}{4}
frac{E_{t-2}m_t + frac{zeta}{2}(E_{t-2}P_{t-1}
+ P_{t-2})}{1+zeta}
+ frac{zeta }{4}Bigl(P_{t-1}+P_{t-2}Bigr)
end{multline*}
end{document}


enter image description here



(red lines indicate text borders)






share|improve this answer















After removing all unnecessary brackets, correcting size of used ones, with use nccmath for medium size fractions and changed lines of equation:



documentclass{article}
usepackage{nccmath}
%---------------- show page layout. don't use in a real document!
usepackage{showframe}
renewcommandShowFrameLinethickness{0.15pt}
renewcommand*ShowFrameColor{color{red}}

begin{document}
begin{multline*}
P_t=
frac{1}{2}Biggl(m_t+v_t-u_t \
+ frac{1-zeta }{2}frac{E_{t-1}m_t
+ mfrac{1-zeta}{2zeta}E_{t-2}m_t
+ mfrac{zeta(1-zeta)}{2(1+zeta)}E_{t-2}P_{t-1}
+ mfrac{zeta}{2}P_{t-1}
+ mfrac{zeta}{1+zeta}P_{t-2}}
{1+zeta}Biggr) \
+ frac{1-zeta}{4}
frac{E_{t-2}m_t + frac{zeta}{2}(E_{t-2}P_{t-1}
+ P_{t-2})}{1+zeta}
+ frac{zeta }{4}Bigl(P_{t-1}+P_{t-2}Bigr)
end{multline*}
end{document}


enter image description here



(red lines indicate text borders)







share|improve this answer














share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer








edited May 27 at 11:32

























answered May 27 at 8:20









ZarkoZarko

148k8 gold badges85 silver badges195 bronze badges




148k8 gold badges85 silver badges195 bronze badges
















  • Thanks a lot, it clearly answers my question.

    – Henam
    May 27 at 9:47











  • I would replace Pi_t with P_t...

    – Mico
    May 27 at 11:19













  • @Mico, done! Thank you very much!

    – Zarko
    May 27 at 11:33



















  • Thanks a lot, it clearly answers my question.

    – Henam
    May 27 at 9:47











  • I would replace Pi_t with P_t...

    – Mico
    May 27 at 11:19













  • @Mico, done! Thank you very much!

    – Zarko
    May 27 at 11:33

















Thanks a lot, it clearly answers my question.

– Henam
May 27 at 9:47





Thanks a lot, it clearly answers my question.

– Henam
May 27 at 9:47













I would replace Pi_t with P_t...

– Mico
May 27 at 11:19







I would replace Pi_t with P_t...

– Mico
May 27 at 11:19















@Mico, done! Thank you very much!

– Zarko
May 27 at 11:33





@Mico, done! Thank you very much!

– Zarko
May 27 at 11:33



















draft saved

draft discarded



















































Thanks for contributing an answer to TeX - LaTeX Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f492822%2fbreak-equation-in-parts%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

He _____ here since 1970 . Answer needed [closed]What does “since he was so high” mean?Meaning of “catch birds for”?How do I ensure “since” takes the meaning I want?“Who cares here” meaningWhat does “right round toward” mean?the time tense (had now been detected)What does the phrase “ring around the roses” mean here?Correct usage of “visited upon”Meaning of “foiled rail sabotage bid”It was the third time I had gone to Rome or It is the third time I had been to Rome

Bunad

Færeyskur hestur Heimild | Tengill | Tilvísanir | LeiðsagnarvalRossið - síða um færeyska hrossið á færeyskuGott ár hjá færeyska hestinum