Hypothetical question about a train





.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty{
margin-bottom:0;
}








0















Imagine a train that comes into a station, stops, and goes back the way it came. Would it be reasonable to say that this train has "turned around"? It has changed direction but there is no literal turning involved.










share|improve this question




















  • 1





    Trains often have an engine section on both ends - and normally they're both "powered up", regardless of which direction the train is moving. But I imagine there are dual controls in the driver's cab at each end, and even though the whole train doesn't "turn around", the driver moves from one end to the other before starting his return journey. So conceptually / functionally, the complete system (train + driver) has actually "rotated". Whatever - we don't normally bother about the details. We just say the train turns around at the terminus and goes back to wherever it came from.

    – FumbleFingers
    May 27 at 14:55






  • 2





    I would say switch/change direction. It's really only important to people who find not facing the direction of travel uncomfortable.

    – KarlG
    May 27 at 15:54


















0















Imagine a train that comes into a station, stops, and goes back the way it came. Would it be reasonable to say that this train has "turned around"? It has changed direction but there is no literal turning involved.










share|improve this question




















  • 1





    Trains often have an engine section on both ends - and normally they're both "powered up", regardless of which direction the train is moving. But I imagine there are dual controls in the driver's cab at each end, and even though the whole train doesn't "turn around", the driver moves from one end to the other before starting his return journey. So conceptually / functionally, the complete system (train + driver) has actually "rotated". Whatever - we don't normally bother about the details. We just say the train turns around at the terminus and goes back to wherever it came from.

    – FumbleFingers
    May 27 at 14:55






  • 2





    I would say switch/change direction. It's really only important to people who find not facing the direction of travel uncomfortable.

    – KarlG
    May 27 at 15:54














0












0








0








Imagine a train that comes into a station, stops, and goes back the way it came. Would it be reasonable to say that this train has "turned around"? It has changed direction but there is no literal turning involved.










share|improve this question














Imagine a train that comes into a station, stops, and goes back the way it came. Would it be reasonable to say that this train has "turned around"? It has changed direction but there is no literal turning involved.







word-choice word-usage






share|improve this question













share|improve this question











share|improve this question




share|improve this question










asked May 27 at 14:40









DerBlauePantherDerBlauePanther

1




1











  • 1





    Trains often have an engine section on both ends - and normally they're both "powered up", regardless of which direction the train is moving. But I imagine there are dual controls in the driver's cab at each end, and even though the whole train doesn't "turn around", the driver moves from one end to the other before starting his return journey. So conceptually / functionally, the complete system (train + driver) has actually "rotated". Whatever - we don't normally bother about the details. We just say the train turns around at the terminus and goes back to wherever it came from.

    – FumbleFingers
    May 27 at 14:55






  • 2





    I would say switch/change direction. It's really only important to people who find not facing the direction of travel uncomfortable.

    – KarlG
    May 27 at 15:54














  • 1





    Trains often have an engine section on both ends - and normally they're both "powered up", regardless of which direction the train is moving. But I imagine there are dual controls in the driver's cab at each end, and even though the whole train doesn't "turn around", the driver moves from one end to the other before starting his return journey. So conceptually / functionally, the complete system (train + driver) has actually "rotated". Whatever - we don't normally bother about the details. We just say the train turns around at the terminus and goes back to wherever it came from.

    – FumbleFingers
    May 27 at 14:55






  • 2





    I would say switch/change direction. It's really only important to people who find not facing the direction of travel uncomfortable.

    – KarlG
    May 27 at 15:54








1




1





Trains often have an engine section on both ends - and normally they're both "powered up", regardless of which direction the train is moving. But I imagine there are dual controls in the driver's cab at each end, and even though the whole train doesn't "turn around", the driver moves from one end to the other before starting his return journey. So conceptually / functionally, the complete system (train + driver) has actually "rotated". Whatever - we don't normally bother about the details. We just say the train turns around at the terminus and goes back to wherever it came from.

– FumbleFingers
May 27 at 14:55





Trains often have an engine section on both ends - and normally they're both "powered up", regardless of which direction the train is moving. But I imagine there are dual controls in the driver's cab at each end, and even though the whole train doesn't "turn around", the driver moves from one end to the other before starting his return journey. So conceptually / functionally, the complete system (train + driver) has actually "rotated". Whatever - we don't normally bother about the details. We just say the train turns around at the terminus and goes back to wherever it came from.

– FumbleFingers
May 27 at 14:55




2




2





I would say switch/change direction. It's really only important to people who find not facing the direction of travel uncomfortable.

– KarlG
May 27 at 15:54





I would say switch/change direction. It's really only important to people who find not facing the direction of travel uncomfortable.

– KarlG
May 27 at 15:54










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















1
















It didn't literally "turn around" and come back, but it did figuratively and colloquially "turn around" and come back. So it's both correct and incorrect, depending on the interpretation.



If you wanted to be very exact about the wording, you might avoid the phrase "turn around". "The train want back the other direction.", "The train returned to Hamburg", etc.






share|improve this answer



























    Your Answer








    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "97"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: false,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: null,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/"u003ecc by-sa 4.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });















    draft saved

    draft discarded
















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fenglish.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f499850%2fhypothetical-question-about-a-train%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes








    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    1
















    It didn't literally "turn around" and come back, but it did figuratively and colloquially "turn around" and come back. So it's both correct and incorrect, depending on the interpretation.



    If you wanted to be very exact about the wording, you might avoid the phrase "turn around". "The train want back the other direction.", "The train returned to Hamburg", etc.






    share|improve this answer






























      1
















      It didn't literally "turn around" and come back, but it did figuratively and colloquially "turn around" and come back. So it's both correct and incorrect, depending on the interpretation.



      If you wanted to be very exact about the wording, you might avoid the phrase "turn around". "The train want back the other direction.", "The train returned to Hamburg", etc.






      share|improve this answer




























        1














        1










        1









        It didn't literally "turn around" and come back, but it did figuratively and colloquially "turn around" and come back. So it's both correct and incorrect, depending on the interpretation.



        If you wanted to be very exact about the wording, you might avoid the phrase "turn around". "The train want back the other direction.", "The train returned to Hamburg", etc.






        share|improve this answer













        It didn't literally "turn around" and come back, but it did figuratively and colloquially "turn around" and come back. So it's both correct and incorrect, depending on the interpretation.



        If you wanted to be very exact about the wording, you might avoid the phrase "turn around". "The train want back the other direction.", "The train returned to Hamburg", etc.







        share|improve this answer












        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer










        answered May 27 at 15:38









        SamSam

        1265 bronze badges




        1265 bronze badges


































            draft saved

            draft discarded



















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to English Language & Usage Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fenglish.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f499850%2fhypothetical-question-about-a-train%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            He _____ here since 1970 . Answer needed [closed]What does “since he was so high” mean?Meaning of “catch birds for”?How do I ensure “since” takes the meaning I want?“Who cares here” meaningWhat does “right round toward” mean?the time tense (had now been detected)What does the phrase “ring around the roses” mean here?Correct usage of “visited upon”Meaning of “foiled rail sabotage bid”It was the third time I had gone to Rome or It is the third time I had been to Rome

            Bunad

            Færeyskur hestur Heimild | Tengill | Tilvísanir | LeiðsagnarvalRossið - síða um færeyska hrossið á færeyskuGott ár hjá færeyska hestinum