How many monosyllabic words does English have? (estimations are fine)












4















I'm writing a post about word length in various languages in the world. It seems that English have (relatively) a lot of one-syllable words. Is there a count or an estimate of how many one-syllable words exists in English?



*I think it's because English have a lot of vowels and possible consonant clusters, they are a lot of possible syllables. This allows English to have a lot of one-syllable words.










share|improve this question























  • I suspect that it's because English retains a lot of Anglo-Saxon words, which are usually monosyllablic. (I think that English has kept a lot of old words, which tend to have just one sound.)

    – Andrew Leach
    Jul 19 '15 at 18:23






  • 1





    @Andrew Leach: Maybe the ones you know are, but Anglo-Saxon words are not "usually monosyllabic".

    – TRomano
    Jul 19 '15 at 19:46











  • Perhaps what he meant is that Anglo-Saxon words are more likely to be monosyllabic than Latinate words.

    – Barmar
    Jul 20 '15 at 16:19











  • Of course, the ability to add numerous affixes to most words means that the total number of words will be many times more than the number of monosyllabic words, because you can create numerous variations of most of them.

    – Barmar
    Jul 20 '15 at 16:21











  • Um...ah...hm..more than you think

    – Oldcat
    Sep 18 '15 at 0:29
















4















I'm writing a post about word length in various languages in the world. It seems that English have (relatively) a lot of one-syllable words. Is there a count or an estimate of how many one-syllable words exists in English?



*I think it's because English have a lot of vowels and possible consonant clusters, they are a lot of possible syllables. This allows English to have a lot of one-syllable words.










share|improve this question























  • I suspect that it's because English retains a lot of Anglo-Saxon words, which are usually monosyllablic. (I think that English has kept a lot of old words, which tend to have just one sound.)

    – Andrew Leach
    Jul 19 '15 at 18:23






  • 1





    @Andrew Leach: Maybe the ones you know are, but Anglo-Saxon words are not "usually monosyllabic".

    – TRomano
    Jul 19 '15 at 19:46











  • Perhaps what he meant is that Anglo-Saxon words are more likely to be monosyllabic than Latinate words.

    – Barmar
    Jul 20 '15 at 16:19











  • Of course, the ability to add numerous affixes to most words means that the total number of words will be many times more than the number of monosyllabic words, because you can create numerous variations of most of them.

    – Barmar
    Jul 20 '15 at 16:21











  • Um...ah...hm..more than you think

    – Oldcat
    Sep 18 '15 at 0:29














4












4








4


4






I'm writing a post about word length in various languages in the world. It seems that English have (relatively) a lot of one-syllable words. Is there a count or an estimate of how many one-syllable words exists in English?



*I think it's because English have a lot of vowels and possible consonant clusters, they are a lot of possible syllables. This allows English to have a lot of one-syllable words.










share|improve this question














I'm writing a post about word length in various languages in the world. It seems that English have (relatively) a lot of one-syllable words. Is there a count or an estimate of how many one-syllable words exists in English?



*I think it's because English have a lot of vowels and possible consonant clusters, they are a lot of possible syllables. This allows English to have a lot of one-syllable words.







morphology syllables






share|improve this question













share|improve this question











share|improve this question




share|improve this question










asked Jul 19 '15 at 16:49









user69715user69715

17415




17415













  • I suspect that it's because English retains a lot of Anglo-Saxon words, which are usually monosyllablic. (I think that English has kept a lot of old words, which tend to have just one sound.)

    – Andrew Leach
    Jul 19 '15 at 18:23






  • 1





    @Andrew Leach: Maybe the ones you know are, but Anglo-Saxon words are not "usually monosyllabic".

    – TRomano
    Jul 19 '15 at 19:46











  • Perhaps what he meant is that Anglo-Saxon words are more likely to be monosyllabic than Latinate words.

    – Barmar
    Jul 20 '15 at 16:19











  • Of course, the ability to add numerous affixes to most words means that the total number of words will be many times more than the number of monosyllabic words, because you can create numerous variations of most of them.

    – Barmar
    Jul 20 '15 at 16:21











  • Um...ah...hm..more than you think

    – Oldcat
    Sep 18 '15 at 0:29



















  • I suspect that it's because English retains a lot of Anglo-Saxon words, which are usually monosyllablic. (I think that English has kept a lot of old words, which tend to have just one sound.)

    – Andrew Leach
    Jul 19 '15 at 18:23






  • 1





    @Andrew Leach: Maybe the ones you know are, but Anglo-Saxon words are not "usually monosyllabic".

    – TRomano
    Jul 19 '15 at 19:46











  • Perhaps what he meant is that Anglo-Saxon words are more likely to be monosyllabic than Latinate words.

    – Barmar
    Jul 20 '15 at 16:19











  • Of course, the ability to add numerous affixes to most words means that the total number of words will be many times more than the number of monosyllabic words, because you can create numerous variations of most of them.

    – Barmar
    Jul 20 '15 at 16:21











  • Um...ah...hm..more than you think

    – Oldcat
    Sep 18 '15 at 0:29

















I suspect that it's because English retains a lot of Anglo-Saxon words, which are usually monosyllablic. (I think that English has kept a lot of old words, which tend to have just one sound.)

– Andrew Leach
Jul 19 '15 at 18:23





I suspect that it's because English retains a lot of Anglo-Saxon words, which are usually monosyllablic. (I think that English has kept a lot of old words, which tend to have just one sound.)

– Andrew Leach
Jul 19 '15 at 18:23




1




1





@Andrew Leach: Maybe the ones you know are, but Anglo-Saxon words are not "usually monosyllabic".

– TRomano
Jul 19 '15 at 19:46





@Andrew Leach: Maybe the ones you know are, but Anglo-Saxon words are not "usually monosyllabic".

– TRomano
Jul 19 '15 at 19:46













Perhaps what he meant is that Anglo-Saxon words are more likely to be monosyllabic than Latinate words.

– Barmar
Jul 20 '15 at 16:19





Perhaps what he meant is that Anglo-Saxon words are more likely to be monosyllabic than Latinate words.

– Barmar
Jul 20 '15 at 16:19













Of course, the ability to add numerous affixes to most words means that the total number of words will be many times more than the number of monosyllabic words, because you can create numerous variations of most of them.

– Barmar
Jul 20 '15 at 16:21





Of course, the ability to add numerous affixes to most words means that the total number of words will be many times more than the number of monosyllabic words, because you can create numerous variations of most of them.

– Barmar
Jul 20 '15 at 16:21













Um...ah...hm..more than you think

– Oldcat
Sep 18 '15 at 0:29





Um...ah...hm..more than you think

– Oldcat
Sep 18 '15 at 0:29










3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes


















2














The Phonetic Word Search website returns nearly 12,000 one-syllable words — input !* @ !* to the search function.



Many of these are extremely rare, so you should probably view this as an upper bound.






share|improve this answer





















  • 1





    What's the base line? (Total number of words)

    – Mitch
    23 hours ago











  • @Mitch: there are around 80,000 words in it.

    – Peter Shor
    21 hours ago








  • 2





    For corroboration, I did the same on the pronunciation file from cmudict: egrep '^.+ [^0-9]+[0-9][^0-9]+$' ~/Downloads/pronc.txt | wc; I got: 14094 out of 116521 words

    – Mitch
    20 hours ago



















1














In the Beginning was Information by Werner Gitt may provide you with a starting point for your investigation. Gitt claims that 71.5% of English words are monosyllabic. You'll have to decide whether Gitt's sampling universe is to your liking.






share|improve this answer



















  • 3





    Is Gitt calculating the percentage of words in the vocabulary, or the percentage of words in the corpus? Almost all of the 100 most common words in English are monosyllabic, and these top 100 words make up half of all written material in English.

    – Barmar
    Jul 20 '15 at 16:25











  • It seems like he must be talking about the corpus. There are around a million words in the English language, but I can't believe there are over 700,000 words with just one syllable.

    – Barmar
    Jul 20 '15 at 16:28











  • In fact, reading the linked site carefully, he definitely is talking about that. He writes "These frequency distributions were obtained from fiction texts".

    – Barmar
    Jul 20 '15 at 16:29











  • Sorry, but his name is Gitt? That's definitely homophonic.....:)

    – Lambie
    20 hours ago



















1














It seems certain that the number of monosyllabic English words is somewhere between 3000 and 40,000. If you exclude inflected forms (see below), I'm fairly certain that the number would be below 30,000.



Definitional issues



Past at certain point, you have to decide on a clear definition of "word" in order to get an accurate answer:




  • probably the most important thing is whether you count inflected forms like walks and walked as separate words from the word walk; because so many English words can inflect (nouns to make plural forms, verbs to make the past-tense form or the third-person present tense form) counting these as three words rather than one will probably substantially increase the number of monosyllabic words.


  • Many infrequent dictionary entries are proper nouns; you need to decide which, if any, of these are included in your definition of "English words".


  • Presumably, unrelated homophones (like steel and steal) will be counted separately. I would also count unrelated homonyms (like bat "flying mammal" and bat "club") separately. It may be a bit less clear whether related words that are homophones and homographs, like walk (n.) and walk (v.), or moved (v.) and moved (adj.), should all be counted separately.



Upper limits



There are probably fewer than 15,831, since Chris Barker gives that as an estimate for the total number of distinct syllables found in any position in real English words ("How many syllables does English have?", link to archived version found in Andrew J. Lintz's answer to the question How many syllables are in the English language?).



Lower limits



The abstract of "Sensory experience ratings for over 5,000 mono- and disyllabic words", by Barbara J. Juhasz and Melvin J. Yap, refers to "2,857 monosyllabic words used in the Juhasz et al. study" on "sensory experience ratings". I would infer that for a word to be useful in this kind of study, it would have to be reasonable to expect an English speaker to be familiar with it, so I think that we can say that there are definitely at least 2,857 monosyllabic words that are fairly well established in English vocabulary. The list of words is available to download in the "Supplementary material" section; I glanced at it, and it does not seem to contain inflected forms ending in -s or -ed.



The Wiktionary category "English 1-syllable words" has 8,671 pages, but there are certainly erroneous inclusions; e.g. 50 or so suffixes (like -ous) and some polysyllabic terms where the pronunciation has only been entered for only part (e.g. slough of despond). It also includes a number of proper nouns and obscure acronyms like BRUK, which you might not want to include in a list of "words". So it's not a hard lower limit, but it might give you an approximate idea of how many single syllables might be considered by some definitions to be English words.



Patrick Corliss wrote an answer to the earlier question "Is there a list of syllables contained in US English?" saying that he had found over 10,000 single syllable words (including names, adopted foreign words, and inflected forms of words).






share|improve this answer

























    Your Answer








    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "97"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: false,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: null,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fenglish.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f260814%2fhow-many-monosyllabic-words-does-english-have-estimations-are-fine%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    3 Answers
    3






    active

    oldest

    votes








    3 Answers
    3






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    2














    The Phonetic Word Search website returns nearly 12,000 one-syllable words — input !* @ !* to the search function.



    Many of these are extremely rare, so you should probably view this as an upper bound.






    share|improve this answer





















    • 1





      What's the base line? (Total number of words)

      – Mitch
      23 hours ago











    • @Mitch: there are around 80,000 words in it.

      – Peter Shor
      21 hours ago








    • 2





      For corroboration, I did the same on the pronunciation file from cmudict: egrep '^.+ [^0-9]+[0-9][^0-9]+$' ~/Downloads/pronc.txt | wc; I got: 14094 out of 116521 words

      – Mitch
      20 hours ago
















    2














    The Phonetic Word Search website returns nearly 12,000 one-syllable words — input !* @ !* to the search function.



    Many of these are extremely rare, so you should probably view this as an upper bound.






    share|improve this answer





















    • 1





      What's the base line? (Total number of words)

      – Mitch
      23 hours ago











    • @Mitch: there are around 80,000 words in it.

      – Peter Shor
      21 hours ago








    • 2





      For corroboration, I did the same on the pronunciation file from cmudict: egrep '^.+ [^0-9]+[0-9][^0-9]+$' ~/Downloads/pronc.txt | wc; I got: 14094 out of 116521 words

      – Mitch
      20 hours ago














    2












    2








    2







    The Phonetic Word Search website returns nearly 12,000 one-syllable words — input !* @ !* to the search function.



    Many of these are extremely rare, so you should probably view this as an upper bound.






    share|improve this answer















    The Phonetic Word Search website returns nearly 12,000 one-syllable words — input !* @ !* to the search function.



    Many of these are extremely rare, so you should probably view this as an upper bound.







    share|improve this answer














    share|improve this answer



    share|improve this answer








    edited 23 hours ago

























    answered 23 hours ago









    Peter Shor Peter Shor

    62.9k5122229




    62.9k5122229








    • 1





      What's the base line? (Total number of words)

      – Mitch
      23 hours ago











    • @Mitch: there are around 80,000 words in it.

      – Peter Shor
      21 hours ago








    • 2





      For corroboration, I did the same on the pronunciation file from cmudict: egrep '^.+ [^0-9]+[0-9][^0-9]+$' ~/Downloads/pronc.txt | wc; I got: 14094 out of 116521 words

      – Mitch
      20 hours ago














    • 1





      What's the base line? (Total number of words)

      – Mitch
      23 hours ago











    • @Mitch: there are around 80,000 words in it.

      – Peter Shor
      21 hours ago








    • 2





      For corroboration, I did the same on the pronunciation file from cmudict: egrep '^.+ [^0-9]+[0-9][^0-9]+$' ~/Downloads/pronc.txt | wc; I got: 14094 out of 116521 words

      – Mitch
      20 hours ago








    1




    1





    What's the base line? (Total number of words)

    – Mitch
    23 hours ago





    What's the base line? (Total number of words)

    – Mitch
    23 hours ago













    @Mitch: there are around 80,000 words in it.

    – Peter Shor
    21 hours ago







    @Mitch: there are around 80,000 words in it.

    – Peter Shor
    21 hours ago






    2




    2





    For corroboration, I did the same on the pronunciation file from cmudict: egrep '^.+ [^0-9]+[0-9][^0-9]+$' ~/Downloads/pronc.txt | wc; I got: 14094 out of 116521 words

    – Mitch
    20 hours ago





    For corroboration, I did the same on the pronunciation file from cmudict: egrep '^.+ [^0-9]+[0-9][^0-9]+$' ~/Downloads/pronc.txt | wc; I got: 14094 out of 116521 words

    – Mitch
    20 hours ago













    1














    In the Beginning was Information by Werner Gitt may provide you with a starting point for your investigation. Gitt claims that 71.5% of English words are monosyllabic. You'll have to decide whether Gitt's sampling universe is to your liking.






    share|improve this answer



















    • 3





      Is Gitt calculating the percentage of words in the vocabulary, or the percentage of words in the corpus? Almost all of the 100 most common words in English are monosyllabic, and these top 100 words make up half of all written material in English.

      – Barmar
      Jul 20 '15 at 16:25











    • It seems like he must be talking about the corpus. There are around a million words in the English language, but I can't believe there are over 700,000 words with just one syllable.

      – Barmar
      Jul 20 '15 at 16:28











    • In fact, reading the linked site carefully, he definitely is talking about that. He writes "These frequency distributions were obtained from fiction texts".

      – Barmar
      Jul 20 '15 at 16:29











    • Sorry, but his name is Gitt? That's definitely homophonic.....:)

      – Lambie
      20 hours ago
















    1














    In the Beginning was Information by Werner Gitt may provide you with a starting point for your investigation. Gitt claims that 71.5% of English words are monosyllabic. You'll have to decide whether Gitt's sampling universe is to your liking.






    share|improve this answer



















    • 3





      Is Gitt calculating the percentage of words in the vocabulary, or the percentage of words in the corpus? Almost all of the 100 most common words in English are monosyllabic, and these top 100 words make up half of all written material in English.

      – Barmar
      Jul 20 '15 at 16:25











    • It seems like he must be talking about the corpus. There are around a million words in the English language, but I can't believe there are over 700,000 words with just one syllable.

      – Barmar
      Jul 20 '15 at 16:28











    • In fact, reading the linked site carefully, he definitely is talking about that. He writes "These frequency distributions were obtained from fiction texts".

      – Barmar
      Jul 20 '15 at 16:29











    • Sorry, but his name is Gitt? That's definitely homophonic.....:)

      – Lambie
      20 hours ago














    1












    1








    1







    In the Beginning was Information by Werner Gitt may provide you with a starting point for your investigation. Gitt claims that 71.5% of English words are monosyllabic. You'll have to decide whether Gitt's sampling universe is to your liking.






    share|improve this answer













    In the Beginning was Information by Werner Gitt may provide you with a starting point for your investigation. Gitt claims that 71.5% of English words are monosyllabic. You'll have to decide whether Gitt's sampling universe is to your liking.







    share|improve this answer












    share|improve this answer



    share|improve this answer










    answered Jul 19 '15 at 17:33









    deadratdeadrat

    42k25292




    42k25292








    • 3





      Is Gitt calculating the percentage of words in the vocabulary, or the percentage of words in the corpus? Almost all of the 100 most common words in English are monosyllabic, and these top 100 words make up half of all written material in English.

      – Barmar
      Jul 20 '15 at 16:25











    • It seems like he must be talking about the corpus. There are around a million words in the English language, but I can't believe there are over 700,000 words with just one syllable.

      – Barmar
      Jul 20 '15 at 16:28











    • In fact, reading the linked site carefully, he definitely is talking about that. He writes "These frequency distributions were obtained from fiction texts".

      – Barmar
      Jul 20 '15 at 16:29











    • Sorry, but his name is Gitt? That's definitely homophonic.....:)

      – Lambie
      20 hours ago














    • 3





      Is Gitt calculating the percentage of words in the vocabulary, or the percentage of words in the corpus? Almost all of the 100 most common words in English are monosyllabic, and these top 100 words make up half of all written material in English.

      – Barmar
      Jul 20 '15 at 16:25











    • It seems like he must be talking about the corpus. There are around a million words in the English language, but I can't believe there are over 700,000 words with just one syllable.

      – Barmar
      Jul 20 '15 at 16:28











    • In fact, reading the linked site carefully, he definitely is talking about that. He writes "These frequency distributions were obtained from fiction texts".

      – Barmar
      Jul 20 '15 at 16:29











    • Sorry, but his name is Gitt? That's definitely homophonic.....:)

      – Lambie
      20 hours ago








    3




    3





    Is Gitt calculating the percentage of words in the vocabulary, or the percentage of words in the corpus? Almost all of the 100 most common words in English are monosyllabic, and these top 100 words make up half of all written material in English.

    – Barmar
    Jul 20 '15 at 16:25





    Is Gitt calculating the percentage of words in the vocabulary, or the percentage of words in the corpus? Almost all of the 100 most common words in English are monosyllabic, and these top 100 words make up half of all written material in English.

    – Barmar
    Jul 20 '15 at 16:25













    It seems like he must be talking about the corpus. There are around a million words in the English language, but I can't believe there are over 700,000 words with just one syllable.

    – Barmar
    Jul 20 '15 at 16:28





    It seems like he must be talking about the corpus. There are around a million words in the English language, but I can't believe there are over 700,000 words with just one syllable.

    – Barmar
    Jul 20 '15 at 16:28













    In fact, reading the linked site carefully, he definitely is talking about that. He writes "These frequency distributions were obtained from fiction texts".

    – Barmar
    Jul 20 '15 at 16:29





    In fact, reading the linked site carefully, he definitely is talking about that. He writes "These frequency distributions were obtained from fiction texts".

    – Barmar
    Jul 20 '15 at 16:29













    Sorry, but his name is Gitt? That's definitely homophonic.....:)

    – Lambie
    20 hours ago





    Sorry, but his name is Gitt? That's definitely homophonic.....:)

    – Lambie
    20 hours ago











    1














    It seems certain that the number of monosyllabic English words is somewhere between 3000 and 40,000. If you exclude inflected forms (see below), I'm fairly certain that the number would be below 30,000.



    Definitional issues



    Past at certain point, you have to decide on a clear definition of "word" in order to get an accurate answer:




    • probably the most important thing is whether you count inflected forms like walks and walked as separate words from the word walk; because so many English words can inflect (nouns to make plural forms, verbs to make the past-tense form or the third-person present tense form) counting these as three words rather than one will probably substantially increase the number of monosyllabic words.


    • Many infrequent dictionary entries are proper nouns; you need to decide which, if any, of these are included in your definition of "English words".


    • Presumably, unrelated homophones (like steel and steal) will be counted separately. I would also count unrelated homonyms (like bat "flying mammal" and bat "club") separately. It may be a bit less clear whether related words that are homophones and homographs, like walk (n.) and walk (v.), or moved (v.) and moved (adj.), should all be counted separately.



    Upper limits



    There are probably fewer than 15,831, since Chris Barker gives that as an estimate for the total number of distinct syllables found in any position in real English words ("How many syllables does English have?", link to archived version found in Andrew J. Lintz's answer to the question How many syllables are in the English language?).



    Lower limits



    The abstract of "Sensory experience ratings for over 5,000 mono- and disyllabic words", by Barbara J. Juhasz and Melvin J. Yap, refers to "2,857 monosyllabic words used in the Juhasz et al. study" on "sensory experience ratings". I would infer that for a word to be useful in this kind of study, it would have to be reasonable to expect an English speaker to be familiar with it, so I think that we can say that there are definitely at least 2,857 monosyllabic words that are fairly well established in English vocabulary. The list of words is available to download in the "Supplementary material" section; I glanced at it, and it does not seem to contain inflected forms ending in -s or -ed.



    The Wiktionary category "English 1-syllable words" has 8,671 pages, but there are certainly erroneous inclusions; e.g. 50 or so suffixes (like -ous) and some polysyllabic terms where the pronunciation has only been entered for only part (e.g. slough of despond). It also includes a number of proper nouns and obscure acronyms like BRUK, which you might not want to include in a list of "words". So it's not a hard lower limit, but it might give you an approximate idea of how many single syllables might be considered by some definitions to be English words.



    Patrick Corliss wrote an answer to the earlier question "Is there a list of syllables contained in US English?" saying that he had found over 10,000 single syllable words (including names, adopted foreign words, and inflected forms of words).






    share|improve this answer






























      1














      It seems certain that the number of monosyllabic English words is somewhere between 3000 and 40,000. If you exclude inflected forms (see below), I'm fairly certain that the number would be below 30,000.



      Definitional issues



      Past at certain point, you have to decide on a clear definition of "word" in order to get an accurate answer:




      • probably the most important thing is whether you count inflected forms like walks and walked as separate words from the word walk; because so many English words can inflect (nouns to make plural forms, verbs to make the past-tense form or the third-person present tense form) counting these as three words rather than one will probably substantially increase the number of monosyllabic words.


      • Many infrequent dictionary entries are proper nouns; you need to decide which, if any, of these are included in your definition of "English words".


      • Presumably, unrelated homophones (like steel and steal) will be counted separately. I would also count unrelated homonyms (like bat "flying mammal" and bat "club") separately. It may be a bit less clear whether related words that are homophones and homographs, like walk (n.) and walk (v.), or moved (v.) and moved (adj.), should all be counted separately.



      Upper limits



      There are probably fewer than 15,831, since Chris Barker gives that as an estimate for the total number of distinct syllables found in any position in real English words ("How many syllables does English have?", link to archived version found in Andrew J. Lintz's answer to the question How many syllables are in the English language?).



      Lower limits



      The abstract of "Sensory experience ratings for over 5,000 mono- and disyllabic words", by Barbara J. Juhasz and Melvin J. Yap, refers to "2,857 monosyllabic words used in the Juhasz et al. study" on "sensory experience ratings". I would infer that for a word to be useful in this kind of study, it would have to be reasonable to expect an English speaker to be familiar with it, so I think that we can say that there are definitely at least 2,857 monosyllabic words that are fairly well established in English vocabulary. The list of words is available to download in the "Supplementary material" section; I glanced at it, and it does not seem to contain inflected forms ending in -s or -ed.



      The Wiktionary category "English 1-syllable words" has 8,671 pages, but there are certainly erroneous inclusions; e.g. 50 or so suffixes (like -ous) and some polysyllabic terms where the pronunciation has only been entered for only part (e.g. slough of despond). It also includes a number of proper nouns and obscure acronyms like BRUK, which you might not want to include in a list of "words". So it's not a hard lower limit, but it might give you an approximate idea of how many single syllables might be considered by some definitions to be English words.



      Patrick Corliss wrote an answer to the earlier question "Is there a list of syllables contained in US English?" saying that he had found over 10,000 single syllable words (including names, adopted foreign words, and inflected forms of words).






      share|improve this answer




























        1












        1








        1







        It seems certain that the number of monosyllabic English words is somewhere between 3000 and 40,000. If you exclude inflected forms (see below), I'm fairly certain that the number would be below 30,000.



        Definitional issues



        Past at certain point, you have to decide on a clear definition of "word" in order to get an accurate answer:




        • probably the most important thing is whether you count inflected forms like walks and walked as separate words from the word walk; because so many English words can inflect (nouns to make plural forms, verbs to make the past-tense form or the third-person present tense form) counting these as three words rather than one will probably substantially increase the number of monosyllabic words.


        • Many infrequent dictionary entries are proper nouns; you need to decide which, if any, of these are included in your definition of "English words".


        • Presumably, unrelated homophones (like steel and steal) will be counted separately. I would also count unrelated homonyms (like bat "flying mammal" and bat "club") separately. It may be a bit less clear whether related words that are homophones and homographs, like walk (n.) and walk (v.), or moved (v.) and moved (adj.), should all be counted separately.



        Upper limits



        There are probably fewer than 15,831, since Chris Barker gives that as an estimate for the total number of distinct syllables found in any position in real English words ("How many syllables does English have?", link to archived version found in Andrew J. Lintz's answer to the question How many syllables are in the English language?).



        Lower limits



        The abstract of "Sensory experience ratings for over 5,000 mono- and disyllabic words", by Barbara J. Juhasz and Melvin J. Yap, refers to "2,857 monosyllabic words used in the Juhasz et al. study" on "sensory experience ratings". I would infer that for a word to be useful in this kind of study, it would have to be reasonable to expect an English speaker to be familiar with it, so I think that we can say that there are definitely at least 2,857 monosyllabic words that are fairly well established in English vocabulary. The list of words is available to download in the "Supplementary material" section; I glanced at it, and it does not seem to contain inflected forms ending in -s or -ed.



        The Wiktionary category "English 1-syllable words" has 8,671 pages, but there are certainly erroneous inclusions; e.g. 50 or so suffixes (like -ous) and some polysyllabic terms where the pronunciation has only been entered for only part (e.g. slough of despond). It also includes a number of proper nouns and obscure acronyms like BRUK, which you might not want to include in a list of "words". So it's not a hard lower limit, but it might give you an approximate idea of how many single syllables might be considered by some definitions to be English words.



        Patrick Corliss wrote an answer to the earlier question "Is there a list of syllables contained in US English?" saying that he had found over 10,000 single syllable words (including names, adopted foreign words, and inflected forms of words).






        share|improve this answer















        It seems certain that the number of monosyllabic English words is somewhere between 3000 and 40,000. If you exclude inflected forms (see below), I'm fairly certain that the number would be below 30,000.



        Definitional issues



        Past at certain point, you have to decide on a clear definition of "word" in order to get an accurate answer:




        • probably the most important thing is whether you count inflected forms like walks and walked as separate words from the word walk; because so many English words can inflect (nouns to make plural forms, verbs to make the past-tense form or the third-person present tense form) counting these as three words rather than one will probably substantially increase the number of monosyllabic words.


        • Many infrequent dictionary entries are proper nouns; you need to decide which, if any, of these are included in your definition of "English words".


        • Presumably, unrelated homophones (like steel and steal) will be counted separately. I would also count unrelated homonyms (like bat "flying mammal" and bat "club") separately. It may be a bit less clear whether related words that are homophones and homographs, like walk (n.) and walk (v.), or moved (v.) and moved (adj.), should all be counted separately.



        Upper limits



        There are probably fewer than 15,831, since Chris Barker gives that as an estimate for the total number of distinct syllables found in any position in real English words ("How many syllables does English have?", link to archived version found in Andrew J. Lintz's answer to the question How many syllables are in the English language?).



        Lower limits



        The abstract of "Sensory experience ratings for over 5,000 mono- and disyllabic words", by Barbara J. Juhasz and Melvin J. Yap, refers to "2,857 monosyllabic words used in the Juhasz et al. study" on "sensory experience ratings". I would infer that for a word to be useful in this kind of study, it would have to be reasonable to expect an English speaker to be familiar with it, so I think that we can say that there are definitely at least 2,857 monosyllabic words that are fairly well established in English vocabulary. The list of words is available to download in the "Supplementary material" section; I glanced at it, and it does not seem to contain inflected forms ending in -s or -ed.



        The Wiktionary category "English 1-syllable words" has 8,671 pages, but there are certainly erroneous inclusions; e.g. 50 or so suffixes (like -ous) and some polysyllabic terms where the pronunciation has only been entered for only part (e.g. slough of despond). It also includes a number of proper nouns and obscure acronyms like BRUK, which you might not want to include in a list of "words". So it's not a hard lower limit, but it might give you an approximate idea of how many single syllables might be considered by some definitions to be English words.



        Patrick Corliss wrote an answer to the earlier question "Is there a list of syllables contained in US English?" saying that he had found over 10,000 single syllable words (including names, adopted foreign words, and inflected forms of words).







        share|improve this answer














        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer








        edited 19 hours ago

























        answered yesterday









        sumelicsumelic

        50.1k8118226




        50.1k8118226






























            draft saved

            draft discarded




















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to English Language & Usage Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fenglish.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f260814%2fhow-many-monosyllabic-words-does-english-have-estimations-are-fine%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Færeyskur hestur Heimild | Tengill | Tilvísanir | LeiðsagnarvalRossið - síða um færeyska hrossið á færeyskuGott ár hjá færeyska hestinum

            He _____ here since 1970 . Answer needed [closed]What does “since he was so high” mean?Meaning of “catch birds for”?How do I ensure “since” takes the meaning I want?“Who cares here” meaningWhat does “right round toward” mean?the time tense (had now been detected)What does the phrase “ring around the roses” mean here?Correct usage of “visited upon”Meaning of “foiled rail sabotage bid”It was the third time I had gone to Rome or It is the third time I had been to Rome

            Slayer Innehåll Historia | Stil, komposition och lyrik | Bandets betydelse och framgångar | Sidoprojekt och samarbeten | Kontroverser | Medlemmar | Utmärkelser och nomineringar | Turnéer och festivaler | Diskografi | Referenser | Externa länkar | Navigeringsmenywww.slayer.net”Metal Massacre vol. 1””Metal Massacre vol. 3””Metal Massacre Volume III””Show No Mercy””Haunting the Chapel””Live Undead””Hell Awaits””Reign in Blood””Reign in Blood””Gold & Platinum – Reign in Blood””Golden Gods Awards Winners”originalet”Kerrang! Hall Of Fame””Slayer Looks Back On 37-Year Career In New Video Series: Part Two””South of Heaven””Gold & Platinum – South of Heaven””Seasons in the Abyss””Gold & Platinum - Seasons in the Abyss””Divine Intervention””Divine Intervention - Release group by Slayer””Gold & Platinum - Divine Intervention””Live Intrusion””Undisputed Attitude””Abolish Government/Superficial Love””Release “Slatanic Slaughter: A Tribute to Slayer” by Various Artists””Diabolus in Musica””Soundtrack to the Apocalypse””God Hates Us All””Systematic - Relationships””War at the Warfield””Gold & Platinum - War at the Warfield””Soundtrack to the Apocalypse””Gold & Platinum - Still Reigning””Metallica, Slayer, Iron Mauden Among Winners At Metal Hammer Awards””Eternal Pyre””Eternal Pyre - Slayer release group””Eternal Pyre””Metal Storm Awards 2006””Kerrang! Hall Of Fame””Slayer Wins 'Best Metal' Grammy Award””Slayer Guitarist Jeff Hanneman Dies””Bullet-For My Valentine booed at Metal Hammer Golden Gods Awards””Unholy Aliance””The End Of Slayer?””Slayer: We Could Thrash Out Two More Albums If We're Fast Enough...””'The Unholy Alliance: Chapter III' UK Dates Added”originalet”Megadeth And Slayer To Co-Headline 'Canadian Carnage' Trek”originalet”World Painted Blood””Release “World Painted Blood” by Slayer””Metallica Heading To Cinemas””Slayer, Megadeth To Join Forces For 'European Carnage' Tour - Dec. 18, 2010”originalet”Slayer's Hanneman Contracts Acute Infection; Band To Bring In Guest Guitarist””Cannibal Corpse's Pat O'Brien Will Step In As Slayer's Guest Guitarist”originalet”Slayer’s Jeff Hanneman Dead at 49””Dave Lombardo Says He Made Only $67,000 In 2011 While Touring With Slayer””Slayer: We Do Not Agree With Dave Lombardo's Substance Or Timeline Of Events””Slayer Welcomes Drummer Paul Bostaph Back To The Fold””Slayer Hope to Unveil Never-Before-Heard Jeff Hanneman Material on Next Album””Slayer Debut New Song 'Implode' During Surprise Golden Gods Appearance””Release group Repentless by Slayer””Repentless - Slayer - Credits””Slayer””Metal Storm Awards 2015””Slayer - to release comic book "Repentless #1"””Slayer To Release 'Repentless' 6.66" Vinyl Box Set””BREAKING NEWS: Slayer Announce Farewell Tour””Slayer Recruit Lamb of God, Anthrax, Behemoth + Testament for Final Tour””Slayer lägger ner efter 37 år””Slayer Announces Second North American Leg Of 'Final' Tour””Final World Tour””Slayer Announces Final European Tour With Lamb of God, Anthrax And Obituary””Slayer To Tour Europe With Lamb of God, Anthrax And Obituary””Slayer To Play 'Last French Show Ever' At Next Year's Hellfst””Slayer's Final World Tour Will Extend Into 2019””Death Angel's Rob Cavestany On Slayer's 'Farewell' Tour: 'Some Of Us Could See This Coming'””Testament Has No Plans To Retire Anytime Soon, Says Chuck Billy””Anthrax's Scott Ian On Slayer's 'Farewell' Tour Plans: 'I Was Surprised And I Wasn't Surprised'””Slayer””Slayer's Morbid Schlock””Review/Rock; For Slayer, the Mania Is the Message””Slayer - Biography””Slayer - Reign In Blood”originalet”Dave Lombardo””An exclusive oral history of Slayer”originalet”Exclusive! Interview With Slayer Guitarist Jeff Hanneman”originalet”Thinking Out Loud: Slayer's Kerry King on hair metal, Satan and being polite””Slayer Lyrics””Slayer - Biography””Most influential artists for extreme metal music””Slayer - Reign in Blood””Slayer guitarist Jeff Hanneman dies aged 49””Slatanic Slaughter: A Tribute to Slayer””Gateway to Hell: A Tribute to Slayer””Covered In Blood””Slayer: The Origins of Thrash in San Francisco, CA.””Why They Rule - #6 Slayer”originalet”Guitar World's 100 Greatest Heavy Metal Guitarists Of All Time”originalet”The fans have spoken: Slayer comes out on top in readers' polls”originalet”Tribute to Jeff Hanneman (1964-2013)””Lamb Of God Frontman: We Sound Like A Slayer Rip-Off””BEHEMOTH Frontman Pays Tribute To SLAYER's JEFF HANNEMAN””Slayer, Hatebreed Doing Double Duty On This Year's Ozzfest””System of a Down””Lacuna Coil’s Andrea Ferro Talks Influences, Skateboarding, Band Origins + More””Slayer - Reign in Blood””Into The Lungs of Hell””Slayer rules - en utställning om fans””Slayer and Their Fans Slashed Through a No-Holds-Barred Night at Gas Monkey””Home””Slayer””Gold & Platinum - The Big 4 Live from Sofia, Bulgaria””Exclusive! Interview With Slayer Guitarist Kerry King””2008-02-23: Wiltern, Los Angeles, CA, USA””Slayer's Kerry King To Perform With Megadeth Tonight! - Oct. 21, 2010”originalet”Dave Lombardo - Biography”Slayer Case DismissedArkiveradUltimate Classic Rock: Slayer guitarist Jeff Hanneman dead at 49.”Slayer: "We could never do any thing like Some Kind Of Monster..."””Cannibal Corpse'S Pat O'Brien Will Step In As Slayer'S Guest Guitarist | The Official Slayer Site”originalet”Slayer Wins 'Best Metal' Grammy Award””Slayer Guitarist Jeff Hanneman Dies””Kerrang! Awards 2006 Blog: Kerrang! Hall Of Fame””Kerrang! Awards 2013: Kerrang! Legend”originalet”Metallica, Slayer, Iron Maien Among Winners At Metal Hammer Awards””Metal Hammer Golden Gods Awards””Bullet For My Valentine Booed At Metal Hammer Golden Gods Awards””Metal Storm Awards 2006””Metal Storm Awards 2015””Slayer's Concert History””Slayer - Relationships””Slayer - Releases”Slayers officiella webbplatsSlayer på MusicBrainzOfficiell webbplatsSlayerSlayerr1373445760000 0001 1540 47353068615-5086262726cb13906545x(data)6033143kn20030215029