How to replace NaN values for image data?












7












$begingroup$


My data set has a total of 200 columns, where each column corresponds to the same pixel in all of my images. In total, I have 48,500 rows. The labels for the data range from 0-9.



The data looks something like this:



raw_0   raw_1   raw_2   raw_3   raw_4
0 120.0 133.0 96.0 155.0 66.0
1 159.0 167.0 163.0 185.0 160.0
2 45.0 239.0 66.0 252.0 NaN
3 126.0 239.0 137.0 NaN 120.0
4 226.0 222.0 153.0 235.0 171.0
5 169.0 81.0 100.0 44.0 104.0
6 154.0 145.0 76.0 134.0 175.0
7 77.0 35.0 105.0 108.0 112.0
8 104.0 55.0 113.0 90.0 107.0
9 97.0 253.0 255.0 251.0 141.0
10 224.0 227.0 84.0 214.0 57.0
11 NaN 13.0 51.0 50.0 NaN
12 82.0 213.0 61.0 98.0 59.0
13 NaN 40.0 84.0 7.0 39.0
14 129.0 103.0 65.0 159.0 NaN
15 123.0 128.0 116.0 198.0 111.0


Each column has around 5% missing values and I want to fill in these NaN
values with something meaningful. However, I'm not sure how to go about this. Any suggestions would be welcome.



Thank you!










share|improve this question











$endgroup$

















    7












    $begingroup$


    My data set has a total of 200 columns, where each column corresponds to the same pixel in all of my images. In total, I have 48,500 rows. The labels for the data range from 0-9.



    The data looks something like this:



    raw_0   raw_1   raw_2   raw_3   raw_4
    0 120.0 133.0 96.0 155.0 66.0
    1 159.0 167.0 163.0 185.0 160.0
    2 45.0 239.0 66.0 252.0 NaN
    3 126.0 239.0 137.0 NaN 120.0
    4 226.0 222.0 153.0 235.0 171.0
    5 169.0 81.0 100.0 44.0 104.0
    6 154.0 145.0 76.0 134.0 175.0
    7 77.0 35.0 105.0 108.0 112.0
    8 104.0 55.0 113.0 90.0 107.0
    9 97.0 253.0 255.0 251.0 141.0
    10 224.0 227.0 84.0 214.0 57.0
    11 NaN 13.0 51.0 50.0 NaN
    12 82.0 213.0 61.0 98.0 59.0
    13 NaN 40.0 84.0 7.0 39.0
    14 129.0 103.0 65.0 159.0 NaN
    15 123.0 128.0 116.0 198.0 111.0


    Each column has around 5% missing values and I want to fill in these NaN
    values with something meaningful. However, I'm not sure how to go about this. Any suggestions would be welcome.



    Thank you!










    share|improve this question











    $endgroup$















      7












      7








      7


      3



      $begingroup$


      My data set has a total of 200 columns, where each column corresponds to the same pixel in all of my images. In total, I have 48,500 rows. The labels for the data range from 0-9.



      The data looks something like this:



      raw_0   raw_1   raw_2   raw_3   raw_4
      0 120.0 133.0 96.0 155.0 66.0
      1 159.0 167.0 163.0 185.0 160.0
      2 45.0 239.0 66.0 252.0 NaN
      3 126.0 239.0 137.0 NaN 120.0
      4 226.0 222.0 153.0 235.0 171.0
      5 169.0 81.0 100.0 44.0 104.0
      6 154.0 145.0 76.0 134.0 175.0
      7 77.0 35.0 105.0 108.0 112.0
      8 104.0 55.0 113.0 90.0 107.0
      9 97.0 253.0 255.0 251.0 141.0
      10 224.0 227.0 84.0 214.0 57.0
      11 NaN 13.0 51.0 50.0 NaN
      12 82.0 213.0 61.0 98.0 59.0
      13 NaN 40.0 84.0 7.0 39.0
      14 129.0 103.0 65.0 159.0 NaN
      15 123.0 128.0 116.0 198.0 111.0


      Each column has around 5% missing values and I want to fill in these NaN
      values with something meaningful. However, I'm not sure how to go about this. Any suggestions would be welcome.



      Thank you!










      share|improve this question











      $endgroup$




      My data set has a total of 200 columns, where each column corresponds to the same pixel in all of my images. In total, I have 48,500 rows. The labels for the data range from 0-9.



      The data looks something like this:



      raw_0   raw_1   raw_2   raw_3   raw_4
      0 120.0 133.0 96.0 155.0 66.0
      1 159.0 167.0 163.0 185.0 160.0
      2 45.0 239.0 66.0 252.0 NaN
      3 126.0 239.0 137.0 NaN 120.0
      4 226.0 222.0 153.0 235.0 171.0
      5 169.0 81.0 100.0 44.0 104.0
      6 154.0 145.0 76.0 134.0 175.0
      7 77.0 35.0 105.0 108.0 112.0
      8 104.0 55.0 113.0 90.0 107.0
      9 97.0 253.0 255.0 251.0 141.0
      10 224.0 227.0 84.0 214.0 57.0
      11 NaN 13.0 51.0 50.0 NaN
      12 82.0 213.0 61.0 98.0 59.0
      13 NaN 40.0 84.0 7.0 39.0
      14 129.0 103.0 65.0 159.0 NaN
      15 123.0 128.0 116.0 198.0 111.0


      Each column has around 5% missing values and I want to fill in these NaN
      values with something meaningful. However, I'm not sure how to go about this. Any suggestions would be welcome.



      Thank you!







      machine-learning python pandas numpy image-preprocessing






      share|improve this question















      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question








      edited May 4 at 20:05









      n1k31t4

      7,3462427




      7,3462427










      asked May 4 at 10:23









      Amer FarooqAmer Farooq

      383




      383






















          4 Answers
          4






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          8












          $begingroup$

          Given you have images stretched out as columns in a table with ~48,500 rows, I am assuming you have the raw images that are 220x220 in dimension.



          You can use a function available via OpenCV called inpaint, which will restore missing pixel values (for example black pixels of degraded photos).



          Here is an image example. Top-left shows the image with missing values (in black). Top-right shows just the missing values (the mask). Bottom-left and bottom-right are the final output, comparing two different algorithms for filling the images.



          restored image



          I would suggest trying both methods on your images to see what looks best.



          Have a look at the Documentation for more details on the algorithms themselves. Here is the documentation of the actual function.



          As for code, it will look something like this:



          import opencv as cv    # you will need to install OpenCV

          dst = cv.inpaint(img, mask, 3, cv.INPAINT_TELEA)



          • the first argument is your image with missing values

          • the second is the mask, with locations of where missing pixels are, i.e. which pixels should be filled/interpolated.

          • third is the radius around missing pixels to fill

          • fourth is the flag for the algorithm to use (see link above for two alternatives)


          For each image, you can generate the mask with something like this:



          mask = image[image == np.nan]





          share|improve this answer











          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            Thank you for the suggestion! Looks promising.
            $endgroup$
            – Amer Farooq
            May 4 at 16:43



















          2












          $begingroup$

          There are multiple ways to go after this. You can do mean imputation, median imputation, mode imputation or most common value imputation. Calculate one of the above value for either rows or columns depending on how your data is structured. One of the simplest ways to fill Nan's are df.fillna in pandas






          share|improve this answer









          $endgroup$





















            2












            $begingroup$

            for any (x,y) if NAN you can impute to average of surrounding pixels as:



            if((x==0  & y==0):
            return (x+1)+(y+1))/2

            else if(x==x_max & y==y_max):
            return (x-1)+(y-1))/2

            else if(x==0 & y==y_max):
            return (x+1)+(y-1))/2

            else if(x==x_max & y==0):
            return (x-1)+(y+1))/2

            else if(x==0):
            return ((x+1)+(y-1)+(y+1))/3

            else if(x==x_max):
            return ((x-1)+(y-1)+(y+1))/3

            else if(y==0):
            return ((x+1)+(x-1)+(y+1))/3

            else if(y==y_max):
            return ((x-1)+(x+1)+(y-1))/3

            else :
            return ((x-1)+(x+1)+(y-1)+(y+1))/4





            share|improve this answer











            $endgroup$





















              1












              $begingroup$

              If adjacent rows are adjacent pixels that I'd just use the average value of the adjacent pixels. That seems like it would make sense for an image, and would certainly be hard for the human eye to see.






              share|improve this answer









              $endgroup$














                Your Answer








                StackExchange.ready(function() {
                var channelOptions = {
                tags: "".split(" "),
                id: "557"
                };
                initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

                StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
                // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
                if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
                StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
                createEditor();
                });
                }
                else {
                createEditor();
                }
                });

                function createEditor() {
                StackExchange.prepareEditor({
                heartbeatType: 'answer',
                autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
                convertImagesToLinks: false,
                noModals: true,
                showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
                reputationToPostImages: null,
                bindNavPrevention: true,
                postfix: "",
                imageUploader: {
                brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
                contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
                allowUrls: true
                },
                onDemand: true,
                discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
                ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
                });


                }
                });














                draft saved

                draft discarded


















                StackExchange.ready(
                function () {
                StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fdatascience.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f51375%2fhow-to-replace-nan-values-for-image-data%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                }
                );

                Post as a guest















                Required, but never shown

























                4 Answers
                4






                active

                oldest

                votes








                4 Answers
                4






                active

                oldest

                votes









                active

                oldest

                votes






                active

                oldest

                votes









                8












                $begingroup$

                Given you have images stretched out as columns in a table with ~48,500 rows, I am assuming you have the raw images that are 220x220 in dimension.



                You can use a function available via OpenCV called inpaint, which will restore missing pixel values (for example black pixels of degraded photos).



                Here is an image example. Top-left shows the image with missing values (in black). Top-right shows just the missing values (the mask). Bottom-left and bottom-right are the final output, comparing two different algorithms for filling the images.



                restored image



                I would suggest trying both methods on your images to see what looks best.



                Have a look at the Documentation for more details on the algorithms themselves. Here is the documentation of the actual function.



                As for code, it will look something like this:



                import opencv as cv    # you will need to install OpenCV

                dst = cv.inpaint(img, mask, 3, cv.INPAINT_TELEA)



                • the first argument is your image with missing values

                • the second is the mask, with locations of where missing pixels are, i.e. which pixels should be filled/interpolated.

                • third is the radius around missing pixels to fill

                • fourth is the flag for the algorithm to use (see link above for two alternatives)


                For each image, you can generate the mask with something like this:



                mask = image[image == np.nan]





                share|improve this answer











                $endgroup$













                • $begingroup$
                  Thank you for the suggestion! Looks promising.
                  $endgroup$
                  – Amer Farooq
                  May 4 at 16:43
















                8












                $begingroup$

                Given you have images stretched out as columns in a table with ~48,500 rows, I am assuming you have the raw images that are 220x220 in dimension.



                You can use a function available via OpenCV called inpaint, which will restore missing pixel values (for example black pixels of degraded photos).



                Here is an image example. Top-left shows the image with missing values (in black). Top-right shows just the missing values (the mask). Bottom-left and bottom-right are the final output, comparing two different algorithms for filling the images.



                restored image



                I would suggest trying both methods on your images to see what looks best.



                Have a look at the Documentation for more details on the algorithms themselves. Here is the documentation of the actual function.



                As for code, it will look something like this:



                import opencv as cv    # you will need to install OpenCV

                dst = cv.inpaint(img, mask, 3, cv.INPAINT_TELEA)



                • the first argument is your image with missing values

                • the second is the mask, with locations of where missing pixels are, i.e. which pixels should be filled/interpolated.

                • third is the radius around missing pixels to fill

                • fourth is the flag for the algorithm to use (see link above for two alternatives)


                For each image, you can generate the mask with something like this:



                mask = image[image == np.nan]





                share|improve this answer











                $endgroup$













                • $begingroup$
                  Thank you for the suggestion! Looks promising.
                  $endgroup$
                  – Amer Farooq
                  May 4 at 16:43














                8












                8








                8





                $begingroup$

                Given you have images stretched out as columns in a table with ~48,500 rows, I am assuming you have the raw images that are 220x220 in dimension.



                You can use a function available via OpenCV called inpaint, which will restore missing pixel values (for example black pixels of degraded photos).



                Here is an image example. Top-left shows the image with missing values (in black). Top-right shows just the missing values (the mask). Bottom-left and bottom-right are the final output, comparing two different algorithms for filling the images.



                restored image



                I would suggest trying both methods on your images to see what looks best.



                Have a look at the Documentation for more details on the algorithms themselves. Here is the documentation of the actual function.



                As for code, it will look something like this:



                import opencv as cv    # you will need to install OpenCV

                dst = cv.inpaint(img, mask, 3, cv.INPAINT_TELEA)



                • the first argument is your image with missing values

                • the second is the mask, with locations of where missing pixels are, i.e. which pixels should be filled/interpolated.

                • third is the radius around missing pixels to fill

                • fourth is the flag for the algorithm to use (see link above for two alternatives)


                For each image, you can generate the mask with something like this:



                mask = image[image == np.nan]





                share|improve this answer











                $endgroup$



                Given you have images stretched out as columns in a table with ~48,500 rows, I am assuming you have the raw images that are 220x220 in dimension.



                You can use a function available via OpenCV called inpaint, which will restore missing pixel values (for example black pixels of degraded photos).



                Here is an image example. Top-left shows the image with missing values (in black). Top-right shows just the missing values (the mask). Bottom-left and bottom-right are the final output, comparing two different algorithms for filling the images.



                restored image



                I would suggest trying both methods on your images to see what looks best.



                Have a look at the Documentation for more details on the algorithms themselves. Here is the documentation of the actual function.



                As for code, it will look something like this:



                import opencv as cv    # you will need to install OpenCV

                dst = cv.inpaint(img, mask, 3, cv.INPAINT_TELEA)



                • the first argument is your image with missing values

                • the second is the mask, with locations of where missing pixels are, i.e. which pixels should be filled/interpolated.

                • third is the radius around missing pixels to fill

                • fourth is the flag for the algorithm to use (see link above for two alternatives)


                For each image, you can generate the mask with something like this:



                mask = image[image == np.nan]






                share|improve this answer














                share|improve this answer



                share|improve this answer








                edited May 21 at 20:12

























                answered May 4 at 15:44









                n1k31t4n1k31t4

                7,3462427




                7,3462427












                • $begingroup$
                  Thank you for the suggestion! Looks promising.
                  $endgroup$
                  – Amer Farooq
                  May 4 at 16:43


















                • $begingroup$
                  Thank you for the suggestion! Looks promising.
                  $endgroup$
                  – Amer Farooq
                  May 4 at 16:43
















                $begingroup$
                Thank you for the suggestion! Looks promising.
                $endgroup$
                – Amer Farooq
                May 4 at 16:43




                $begingroup$
                Thank you for the suggestion! Looks promising.
                $endgroup$
                – Amer Farooq
                May 4 at 16:43











                2












                $begingroup$

                There are multiple ways to go after this. You can do mean imputation, median imputation, mode imputation or most common value imputation. Calculate one of the above value for either rows or columns depending on how your data is structured. One of the simplest ways to fill Nan's are df.fillna in pandas






                share|improve this answer









                $endgroup$


















                  2












                  $begingroup$

                  There are multiple ways to go after this. You can do mean imputation, median imputation, mode imputation or most common value imputation. Calculate one of the above value for either rows or columns depending on how your data is structured. One of the simplest ways to fill Nan's are df.fillna in pandas






                  share|improve this answer









                  $endgroup$
















                    2












                    2








                    2





                    $begingroup$

                    There are multiple ways to go after this. You can do mean imputation, median imputation, mode imputation or most common value imputation. Calculate one of the above value for either rows or columns depending on how your data is structured. One of the simplest ways to fill Nan's are df.fillna in pandas






                    share|improve this answer









                    $endgroup$



                    There are multiple ways to go after this. You can do mean imputation, median imputation, mode imputation or most common value imputation. Calculate one of the above value for either rows or columns depending on how your data is structured. One of the simplest ways to fill Nan's are df.fillna in pandas







                    share|improve this answer












                    share|improve this answer



                    share|improve this answer










                    answered May 4 at 13:00









                    karthikeyan mgkarthikeyan mg

                    348111




                    348111























                        2












                        $begingroup$

                        for any (x,y) if NAN you can impute to average of surrounding pixels as:



                        if((x==0  & y==0):
                        return (x+1)+(y+1))/2

                        else if(x==x_max & y==y_max):
                        return (x-1)+(y-1))/2

                        else if(x==0 & y==y_max):
                        return (x+1)+(y-1))/2

                        else if(x==x_max & y==0):
                        return (x-1)+(y+1))/2

                        else if(x==0):
                        return ((x+1)+(y-1)+(y+1))/3

                        else if(x==x_max):
                        return ((x-1)+(y-1)+(y+1))/3

                        else if(y==0):
                        return ((x+1)+(x-1)+(y+1))/3

                        else if(y==y_max):
                        return ((x-1)+(x+1)+(y-1))/3

                        else :
                        return ((x-1)+(x+1)+(y-1)+(y+1))/4





                        share|improve this answer











                        $endgroup$


















                          2












                          $begingroup$

                          for any (x,y) if NAN you can impute to average of surrounding pixels as:



                          if((x==0  & y==0):
                          return (x+1)+(y+1))/2

                          else if(x==x_max & y==y_max):
                          return (x-1)+(y-1))/2

                          else if(x==0 & y==y_max):
                          return (x+1)+(y-1))/2

                          else if(x==x_max & y==0):
                          return (x-1)+(y+1))/2

                          else if(x==0):
                          return ((x+1)+(y-1)+(y+1))/3

                          else if(x==x_max):
                          return ((x-1)+(y-1)+(y+1))/3

                          else if(y==0):
                          return ((x+1)+(x-1)+(y+1))/3

                          else if(y==y_max):
                          return ((x-1)+(x+1)+(y-1))/3

                          else :
                          return ((x-1)+(x+1)+(y-1)+(y+1))/4





                          share|improve this answer











                          $endgroup$
















                            2












                            2








                            2





                            $begingroup$

                            for any (x,y) if NAN you can impute to average of surrounding pixels as:



                            if((x==0  & y==0):
                            return (x+1)+(y+1))/2

                            else if(x==x_max & y==y_max):
                            return (x-1)+(y-1))/2

                            else if(x==0 & y==y_max):
                            return (x+1)+(y-1))/2

                            else if(x==x_max & y==0):
                            return (x-1)+(y+1))/2

                            else if(x==0):
                            return ((x+1)+(y-1)+(y+1))/3

                            else if(x==x_max):
                            return ((x-1)+(y-1)+(y+1))/3

                            else if(y==0):
                            return ((x+1)+(x-1)+(y+1))/3

                            else if(y==y_max):
                            return ((x-1)+(x+1)+(y-1))/3

                            else :
                            return ((x-1)+(x+1)+(y-1)+(y+1))/4





                            share|improve this answer











                            $endgroup$



                            for any (x,y) if NAN you can impute to average of surrounding pixels as:



                            if((x==0  & y==0):
                            return (x+1)+(y+1))/2

                            else if(x==x_max & y==y_max):
                            return (x-1)+(y-1))/2

                            else if(x==0 & y==y_max):
                            return (x+1)+(y-1))/2

                            else if(x==x_max & y==0):
                            return (x-1)+(y+1))/2

                            else if(x==0):
                            return ((x+1)+(y-1)+(y+1))/3

                            else if(x==x_max):
                            return ((x-1)+(y-1)+(y+1))/3

                            else if(y==0):
                            return ((x+1)+(x-1)+(y+1))/3

                            else if(y==y_max):
                            return ((x-1)+(x+1)+(y-1))/3

                            else :
                            return ((x-1)+(x+1)+(y-1)+(y+1))/4






                            share|improve this answer














                            share|improve this answer



                            share|improve this answer








                            edited May 4 at 13:32









                            Mark.F

                            1,1491822




                            1,1491822










                            answered May 4 at 12:49









                            AnshAnsh

                            191




                            191























                                1












                                $begingroup$

                                If adjacent rows are adjacent pixels that I'd just use the average value of the adjacent pixels. That seems like it would make sense for an image, and would certainly be hard for the human eye to see.






                                share|improve this answer









                                $endgroup$


















                                  1












                                  $begingroup$

                                  If adjacent rows are adjacent pixels that I'd just use the average value of the adjacent pixels. That seems like it would make sense for an image, and would certainly be hard for the human eye to see.






                                  share|improve this answer









                                  $endgroup$
















                                    1












                                    1








                                    1





                                    $begingroup$

                                    If adjacent rows are adjacent pixels that I'd just use the average value of the adjacent pixels. That seems like it would make sense for an image, and would certainly be hard for the human eye to see.






                                    share|improve this answer









                                    $endgroup$



                                    If adjacent rows are adjacent pixels that I'd just use the average value of the adjacent pixels. That seems like it would make sense for an image, and would certainly be hard for the human eye to see.







                                    share|improve this answer












                                    share|improve this answer



                                    share|improve this answer










                                    answered May 4 at 12:13









                                    bstrainbstrain

                                    17616




                                    17616






























                                        draft saved

                                        draft discarded




















































                                        Thanks for contributing an answer to Data Science Stack Exchange!


                                        • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                                        But avoid



                                        • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                                        • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                                        Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                                        To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                                        draft saved


                                        draft discarded














                                        StackExchange.ready(
                                        function () {
                                        StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fdatascience.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f51375%2fhow-to-replace-nan-values-for-image-data%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                                        }
                                        );

                                        Post as a guest















                                        Required, but never shown





















































                                        Required, but never shown














                                        Required, but never shown












                                        Required, but never shown







                                        Required, but never shown

































                                        Required, but never shown














                                        Required, but never shown












                                        Required, but never shown







                                        Required, but never shown







                                        Popular posts from this blog

                                        Bruad Bilen | Luke uk diar | NawigatsjuunCommonskategorii: BruadCommonskategorii: RunstükenWikiquote: Bruad

                                        What is the offset in a seaplane's hull?

                                        Slayer Innehåll Historia | Stil, komposition och lyrik | Bandets betydelse och framgångar | Sidoprojekt och samarbeten | Kontroverser | Medlemmar | Utmärkelser och nomineringar | Turnéer och festivaler | Diskografi | Referenser | Externa länkar | Navigeringsmenywww.slayer.net”Metal Massacre vol. 1””Metal Massacre vol. 3””Metal Massacre Volume III””Show No Mercy””Haunting the Chapel””Live Undead””Hell Awaits””Reign in Blood””Reign in Blood””Gold & Platinum – Reign in Blood””Golden Gods Awards Winners”originalet”Kerrang! Hall Of Fame””Slayer Looks Back On 37-Year Career In New Video Series: Part Two””South of Heaven””Gold & Platinum – South of Heaven””Seasons in the Abyss””Gold & Platinum - Seasons in the Abyss””Divine Intervention””Divine Intervention - Release group by Slayer””Gold & Platinum - Divine Intervention””Live Intrusion””Undisputed Attitude””Abolish Government/Superficial Love””Release “Slatanic Slaughter: A Tribute to Slayer” by Various Artists””Diabolus in Musica””Soundtrack to the Apocalypse””God Hates Us All””Systematic - Relationships””War at the Warfield””Gold & Platinum - War at the Warfield””Soundtrack to the Apocalypse””Gold & Platinum - Still Reigning””Metallica, Slayer, Iron Mauden Among Winners At Metal Hammer Awards””Eternal Pyre””Eternal Pyre - Slayer release group””Eternal Pyre””Metal Storm Awards 2006””Kerrang! Hall Of Fame””Slayer Wins 'Best Metal' Grammy Award””Slayer Guitarist Jeff Hanneman Dies””Bullet-For My Valentine booed at Metal Hammer Golden Gods Awards””Unholy Aliance””The End Of Slayer?””Slayer: We Could Thrash Out Two More Albums If We're Fast Enough...””'The Unholy Alliance: Chapter III' UK Dates Added”originalet”Megadeth And Slayer To Co-Headline 'Canadian Carnage' Trek”originalet”World Painted Blood””Release “World Painted Blood” by Slayer””Metallica Heading To Cinemas””Slayer, Megadeth To Join Forces For 'European Carnage' Tour - Dec. 18, 2010”originalet”Slayer's Hanneman Contracts Acute Infection; Band To Bring In Guest Guitarist””Cannibal Corpse's Pat O'Brien Will Step In As Slayer's Guest Guitarist”originalet”Slayer’s Jeff Hanneman Dead at 49””Dave Lombardo Says He Made Only $67,000 In 2011 While Touring With Slayer””Slayer: We Do Not Agree With Dave Lombardo's Substance Or Timeline Of Events””Slayer Welcomes Drummer Paul Bostaph Back To The Fold””Slayer Hope to Unveil Never-Before-Heard Jeff Hanneman Material on Next Album””Slayer Debut New Song 'Implode' During Surprise Golden Gods Appearance””Release group Repentless by Slayer””Repentless - Slayer - Credits””Slayer””Metal Storm Awards 2015””Slayer - to release comic book "Repentless #1"””Slayer To Release 'Repentless' 6.66" Vinyl Box Set””BREAKING NEWS: Slayer Announce Farewell Tour””Slayer Recruit Lamb of God, Anthrax, Behemoth + Testament for Final Tour””Slayer lägger ner efter 37 år””Slayer Announces Second North American Leg Of 'Final' Tour””Final World Tour””Slayer Announces Final European Tour With Lamb of God, Anthrax And Obituary””Slayer To Tour Europe With Lamb of God, Anthrax And Obituary””Slayer To Play 'Last French Show Ever' At Next Year's Hellfst””Slayer's Final World Tour Will Extend Into 2019””Death Angel's Rob Cavestany On Slayer's 'Farewell' Tour: 'Some Of Us Could See This Coming'””Testament Has No Plans To Retire Anytime Soon, Says Chuck Billy””Anthrax's Scott Ian On Slayer's 'Farewell' Tour Plans: 'I Was Surprised And I Wasn't Surprised'””Slayer””Slayer's Morbid Schlock””Review/Rock; For Slayer, the Mania Is the Message””Slayer - Biography””Slayer - Reign In Blood”originalet”Dave Lombardo””An exclusive oral history of Slayer”originalet”Exclusive! Interview With Slayer Guitarist Jeff Hanneman”originalet”Thinking Out Loud: Slayer's Kerry King on hair metal, Satan and being polite””Slayer Lyrics””Slayer - Biography””Most influential artists for extreme metal music””Slayer - Reign in Blood””Slayer guitarist Jeff Hanneman dies aged 49””Slatanic Slaughter: A Tribute to Slayer””Gateway to Hell: A Tribute to Slayer””Covered In Blood””Slayer: The Origins of Thrash in San Francisco, CA.””Why They Rule - #6 Slayer”originalet”Guitar World's 100 Greatest Heavy Metal Guitarists Of All Time”originalet”The fans have spoken: Slayer comes out on top in readers' polls”originalet”Tribute to Jeff Hanneman (1964-2013)””Lamb Of God Frontman: We Sound Like A Slayer Rip-Off””BEHEMOTH Frontman Pays Tribute To SLAYER's JEFF HANNEMAN””Slayer, Hatebreed Doing Double Duty On This Year's Ozzfest””System of a Down””Lacuna Coil’s Andrea Ferro Talks Influences, Skateboarding, Band Origins + More””Slayer - Reign in Blood””Into The Lungs of Hell””Slayer rules - en utställning om fans””Slayer and Their Fans Slashed Through a No-Holds-Barred Night at Gas Monkey””Home””Slayer””Gold & Platinum - The Big 4 Live from Sofia, Bulgaria””Exclusive! Interview With Slayer Guitarist Kerry King””2008-02-23: Wiltern, Los Angeles, CA, USA””Slayer's Kerry King To Perform With Megadeth Tonight! - Oct. 21, 2010”originalet”Dave Lombardo - Biography”Slayer Case DismissedArkiveradUltimate Classic Rock: Slayer guitarist Jeff Hanneman dead at 49.”Slayer: "We could never do any thing like Some Kind Of Monster..."””Cannibal Corpse'S Pat O'Brien Will Step In As Slayer'S Guest Guitarist | The Official Slayer Site”originalet”Slayer Wins 'Best Metal' Grammy Award””Slayer Guitarist Jeff Hanneman Dies””Kerrang! Awards 2006 Blog: Kerrang! Hall Of Fame””Kerrang! Awards 2013: Kerrang! Legend”originalet”Metallica, Slayer, Iron Maien Among Winners At Metal Hammer Awards””Metal Hammer Golden Gods Awards””Bullet For My Valentine Booed At Metal Hammer Golden Gods Awards””Metal Storm Awards 2006””Metal Storm Awards 2015””Slayer's Concert History””Slayer - Relationships””Slayer - Releases”Slayers officiella webbplatsSlayer på MusicBrainzOfficiell webbplatsSlayerSlayerr1373445760000 0001 1540 47353068615-5086262726cb13906545x(data)6033143kn20030215029