How to replace NaN values for image data?
$begingroup$
My data set has a total of 200 columns, where each column corresponds to the same pixel in all of my images. In total, I have 48,500 rows. The labels for the data range from 0-9.
The data looks something like this:
raw_0 raw_1 raw_2 raw_3 raw_4
0 120.0 133.0 96.0 155.0 66.0
1 159.0 167.0 163.0 185.0 160.0
2 45.0 239.0 66.0 252.0 NaN
3 126.0 239.0 137.0 NaN 120.0
4 226.0 222.0 153.0 235.0 171.0
5 169.0 81.0 100.0 44.0 104.0
6 154.0 145.0 76.0 134.0 175.0
7 77.0 35.0 105.0 108.0 112.0
8 104.0 55.0 113.0 90.0 107.0
9 97.0 253.0 255.0 251.0 141.0
10 224.0 227.0 84.0 214.0 57.0
11 NaN 13.0 51.0 50.0 NaN
12 82.0 213.0 61.0 98.0 59.0
13 NaN 40.0 84.0 7.0 39.0
14 129.0 103.0 65.0 159.0 NaN
15 123.0 128.0 116.0 198.0 111.0
Each column has around 5% missing values and I want to fill in these NaN
values with something meaningful. However, I'm not sure how to go about this. Any suggestions would be welcome.
Thank you!
machine-learning python pandas numpy image-preprocessing
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
My data set has a total of 200 columns, where each column corresponds to the same pixel in all of my images. In total, I have 48,500 rows. The labels for the data range from 0-9.
The data looks something like this:
raw_0 raw_1 raw_2 raw_3 raw_4
0 120.0 133.0 96.0 155.0 66.0
1 159.0 167.0 163.0 185.0 160.0
2 45.0 239.0 66.0 252.0 NaN
3 126.0 239.0 137.0 NaN 120.0
4 226.0 222.0 153.0 235.0 171.0
5 169.0 81.0 100.0 44.0 104.0
6 154.0 145.0 76.0 134.0 175.0
7 77.0 35.0 105.0 108.0 112.0
8 104.0 55.0 113.0 90.0 107.0
9 97.0 253.0 255.0 251.0 141.0
10 224.0 227.0 84.0 214.0 57.0
11 NaN 13.0 51.0 50.0 NaN
12 82.0 213.0 61.0 98.0 59.0
13 NaN 40.0 84.0 7.0 39.0
14 129.0 103.0 65.0 159.0 NaN
15 123.0 128.0 116.0 198.0 111.0
Each column has around 5% missing values and I want to fill in these NaN
values with something meaningful. However, I'm not sure how to go about this. Any suggestions would be welcome.
Thank you!
machine-learning python pandas numpy image-preprocessing
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
My data set has a total of 200 columns, where each column corresponds to the same pixel in all of my images. In total, I have 48,500 rows. The labels for the data range from 0-9.
The data looks something like this:
raw_0 raw_1 raw_2 raw_3 raw_4
0 120.0 133.0 96.0 155.0 66.0
1 159.0 167.0 163.0 185.0 160.0
2 45.0 239.0 66.0 252.0 NaN
3 126.0 239.0 137.0 NaN 120.0
4 226.0 222.0 153.0 235.0 171.0
5 169.0 81.0 100.0 44.0 104.0
6 154.0 145.0 76.0 134.0 175.0
7 77.0 35.0 105.0 108.0 112.0
8 104.0 55.0 113.0 90.0 107.0
9 97.0 253.0 255.0 251.0 141.0
10 224.0 227.0 84.0 214.0 57.0
11 NaN 13.0 51.0 50.0 NaN
12 82.0 213.0 61.0 98.0 59.0
13 NaN 40.0 84.0 7.0 39.0
14 129.0 103.0 65.0 159.0 NaN
15 123.0 128.0 116.0 198.0 111.0
Each column has around 5% missing values and I want to fill in these NaN
values with something meaningful. However, I'm not sure how to go about this. Any suggestions would be welcome.
Thank you!
machine-learning python pandas numpy image-preprocessing
$endgroup$
My data set has a total of 200 columns, where each column corresponds to the same pixel in all of my images. In total, I have 48,500 rows. The labels for the data range from 0-9.
The data looks something like this:
raw_0 raw_1 raw_2 raw_3 raw_4
0 120.0 133.0 96.0 155.0 66.0
1 159.0 167.0 163.0 185.0 160.0
2 45.0 239.0 66.0 252.0 NaN
3 126.0 239.0 137.0 NaN 120.0
4 226.0 222.0 153.0 235.0 171.0
5 169.0 81.0 100.0 44.0 104.0
6 154.0 145.0 76.0 134.0 175.0
7 77.0 35.0 105.0 108.0 112.0
8 104.0 55.0 113.0 90.0 107.0
9 97.0 253.0 255.0 251.0 141.0
10 224.0 227.0 84.0 214.0 57.0
11 NaN 13.0 51.0 50.0 NaN
12 82.0 213.0 61.0 98.0 59.0
13 NaN 40.0 84.0 7.0 39.0
14 129.0 103.0 65.0 159.0 NaN
15 123.0 128.0 116.0 198.0 111.0
Each column has around 5% missing values and I want to fill in these NaN
values with something meaningful. However, I'm not sure how to go about this. Any suggestions would be welcome.
Thank you!
machine-learning python pandas numpy image-preprocessing
machine-learning python pandas numpy image-preprocessing
edited May 4 at 20:05
n1k31t4
7,3462427
7,3462427
asked May 4 at 10:23
Amer FarooqAmer Farooq
383
383
add a comment |
add a comment |
4 Answers
4
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Given you have images stretched out as columns in a table with ~48,500 rows, I am assuming you have the raw images that are 220x220 in dimension.
You can use a function available via OpenCV called inpaint, which will restore missing pixel values (for example black pixels of degraded photos).
Here is an image example. Top-left shows the image with missing values (in black). Top-right shows just the missing values (the mask). Bottom-left and bottom-right are the final output, comparing two different algorithms for filling the images.

I would suggest trying both methods on your images to see what looks best.
Have a look at the Documentation for more details on the algorithms themselves. Here is the documentation of the actual function.
As for code, it will look something like this:
import opencv as cv # you will need to install OpenCV
dst = cv.inpaint(img, mask, 3, cv.INPAINT_TELEA)
- the first argument is your image with missing values
- the second is the mask, with locations of where missing pixels are, i.e. which pixels should be filled/interpolated.
- third is the radius around missing pixels to fill
- fourth is the flag for the algorithm to use (see link above for two alternatives)
For each image, you can generate the mask with something like this:
mask = image[image == np.nan]
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Thank you for the suggestion! Looks promising.
$endgroup$
– Amer Farooq
May 4 at 16:43
add a comment |
$begingroup$
There are multiple ways to go after this. You can do mean imputation, median imputation, mode imputation or most common value imputation. Calculate one of the above value for either rows or columns depending on how your data is structured. One of the simplest ways to fill Nan's are df.fillna in pandas
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
for any (x,y) if NAN you can impute to average of surrounding pixels as:
if((x==0 & y==0):
return (x+1)+(y+1))/2
else if(x==x_max & y==y_max):
return (x-1)+(y-1))/2
else if(x==0 & y==y_max):
return (x+1)+(y-1))/2
else if(x==x_max & y==0):
return (x-1)+(y+1))/2
else if(x==0):
return ((x+1)+(y-1)+(y+1))/3
else if(x==x_max):
return ((x-1)+(y-1)+(y+1))/3
else if(y==0):
return ((x+1)+(x-1)+(y+1))/3
else if(y==y_max):
return ((x-1)+(x+1)+(y-1))/3
else :
return ((x-1)+(x+1)+(y-1)+(y+1))/4
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
If adjacent rows are adjacent pixels that I'd just use the average value of the adjacent pixels. That seems like it would make sense for an image, and would certainly be hard for the human eye to see.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "557"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fdatascience.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f51375%2fhow-to-replace-nan-values-for-image-data%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
4 Answers
4
active
oldest
votes
4 Answers
4
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Given you have images stretched out as columns in a table with ~48,500 rows, I am assuming you have the raw images that are 220x220 in dimension.
You can use a function available via OpenCV called inpaint, which will restore missing pixel values (for example black pixels of degraded photos).
Here is an image example. Top-left shows the image with missing values (in black). Top-right shows just the missing values (the mask). Bottom-left and bottom-right are the final output, comparing two different algorithms for filling the images.

I would suggest trying both methods on your images to see what looks best.
Have a look at the Documentation for more details on the algorithms themselves. Here is the documentation of the actual function.
As for code, it will look something like this:
import opencv as cv # you will need to install OpenCV
dst = cv.inpaint(img, mask, 3, cv.INPAINT_TELEA)
- the first argument is your image with missing values
- the second is the mask, with locations of where missing pixels are, i.e. which pixels should be filled/interpolated.
- third is the radius around missing pixels to fill
- fourth is the flag for the algorithm to use (see link above for two alternatives)
For each image, you can generate the mask with something like this:
mask = image[image == np.nan]
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Thank you for the suggestion! Looks promising.
$endgroup$
– Amer Farooq
May 4 at 16:43
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Given you have images stretched out as columns in a table with ~48,500 rows, I am assuming you have the raw images that are 220x220 in dimension.
You can use a function available via OpenCV called inpaint, which will restore missing pixel values (for example black pixels of degraded photos).
Here is an image example. Top-left shows the image with missing values (in black). Top-right shows just the missing values (the mask). Bottom-left and bottom-right are the final output, comparing two different algorithms for filling the images.

I would suggest trying both methods on your images to see what looks best.
Have a look at the Documentation for more details on the algorithms themselves. Here is the documentation of the actual function.
As for code, it will look something like this:
import opencv as cv # you will need to install OpenCV
dst = cv.inpaint(img, mask, 3, cv.INPAINT_TELEA)
- the first argument is your image with missing values
- the second is the mask, with locations of where missing pixels are, i.e. which pixels should be filled/interpolated.
- third is the radius around missing pixels to fill
- fourth is the flag for the algorithm to use (see link above for two alternatives)
For each image, you can generate the mask with something like this:
mask = image[image == np.nan]
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Thank you for the suggestion! Looks promising.
$endgroup$
– Amer Farooq
May 4 at 16:43
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Given you have images stretched out as columns in a table with ~48,500 rows, I am assuming you have the raw images that are 220x220 in dimension.
You can use a function available via OpenCV called inpaint, which will restore missing pixel values (for example black pixels of degraded photos).
Here is an image example. Top-left shows the image with missing values (in black). Top-right shows just the missing values (the mask). Bottom-left and bottom-right are the final output, comparing two different algorithms for filling the images.

I would suggest trying both methods on your images to see what looks best.
Have a look at the Documentation for more details on the algorithms themselves. Here is the documentation of the actual function.
As for code, it will look something like this:
import opencv as cv # you will need to install OpenCV
dst = cv.inpaint(img, mask, 3, cv.INPAINT_TELEA)
- the first argument is your image with missing values
- the second is the mask, with locations of where missing pixels are, i.e. which pixels should be filled/interpolated.
- third is the radius around missing pixels to fill
- fourth is the flag for the algorithm to use (see link above for two alternatives)
For each image, you can generate the mask with something like this:
mask = image[image == np.nan]
$endgroup$
Given you have images stretched out as columns in a table with ~48,500 rows, I am assuming you have the raw images that are 220x220 in dimension.
You can use a function available via OpenCV called inpaint, which will restore missing pixel values (for example black pixels of degraded photos).
Here is an image example. Top-left shows the image with missing values (in black). Top-right shows just the missing values (the mask). Bottom-left and bottom-right are the final output, comparing two different algorithms for filling the images.

I would suggest trying both methods on your images to see what looks best.
Have a look at the Documentation for more details on the algorithms themselves. Here is the documentation of the actual function.
As for code, it will look something like this:
import opencv as cv # you will need to install OpenCV
dst = cv.inpaint(img, mask, 3, cv.INPAINT_TELEA)
- the first argument is your image with missing values
- the second is the mask, with locations of where missing pixels are, i.e. which pixels should be filled/interpolated.
- third is the radius around missing pixels to fill
- fourth is the flag for the algorithm to use (see link above for two alternatives)
For each image, you can generate the mask with something like this:
mask = image[image == np.nan]
edited May 21 at 20:12
answered May 4 at 15:44
n1k31t4n1k31t4
7,3462427
7,3462427
$begingroup$
Thank you for the suggestion! Looks promising.
$endgroup$
– Amer Farooq
May 4 at 16:43
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Thank you for the suggestion! Looks promising.
$endgroup$
– Amer Farooq
May 4 at 16:43
$begingroup$
Thank you for the suggestion! Looks promising.
$endgroup$
– Amer Farooq
May 4 at 16:43
$begingroup$
Thank you for the suggestion! Looks promising.
$endgroup$
– Amer Farooq
May 4 at 16:43
add a comment |
$begingroup$
There are multiple ways to go after this. You can do mean imputation, median imputation, mode imputation or most common value imputation. Calculate one of the above value for either rows or columns depending on how your data is structured. One of the simplest ways to fill Nan's are df.fillna in pandas
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
There are multiple ways to go after this. You can do mean imputation, median imputation, mode imputation or most common value imputation. Calculate one of the above value for either rows or columns depending on how your data is structured. One of the simplest ways to fill Nan's are df.fillna in pandas
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
There are multiple ways to go after this. You can do mean imputation, median imputation, mode imputation or most common value imputation. Calculate one of the above value for either rows or columns depending on how your data is structured. One of the simplest ways to fill Nan's are df.fillna in pandas
$endgroup$
There are multiple ways to go after this. You can do mean imputation, median imputation, mode imputation or most common value imputation. Calculate one of the above value for either rows or columns depending on how your data is structured. One of the simplest ways to fill Nan's are df.fillna in pandas
answered May 4 at 13:00
karthikeyan mgkarthikeyan mg
348111
348111
add a comment |
add a comment |
$begingroup$
for any (x,y) if NAN you can impute to average of surrounding pixels as:
if((x==0 & y==0):
return (x+1)+(y+1))/2
else if(x==x_max & y==y_max):
return (x-1)+(y-1))/2
else if(x==0 & y==y_max):
return (x+1)+(y-1))/2
else if(x==x_max & y==0):
return (x-1)+(y+1))/2
else if(x==0):
return ((x+1)+(y-1)+(y+1))/3
else if(x==x_max):
return ((x-1)+(y-1)+(y+1))/3
else if(y==0):
return ((x+1)+(x-1)+(y+1))/3
else if(y==y_max):
return ((x-1)+(x+1)+(y-1))/3
else :
return ((x-1)+(x+1)+(y-1)+(y+1))/4
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
for any (x,y) if NAN you can impute to average of surrounding pixels as:
if((x==0 & y==0):
return (x+1)+(y+1))/2
else if(x==x_max & y==y_max):
return (x-1)+(y-1))/2
else if(x==0 & y==y_max):
return (x+1)+(y-1))/2
else if(x==x_max & y==0):
return (x-1)+(y+1))/2
else if(x==0):
return ((x+1)+(y-1)+(y+1))/3
else if(x==x_max):
return ((x-1)+(y-1)+(y+1))/3
else if(y==0):
return ((x+1)+(x-1)+(y+1))/3
else if(y==y_max):
return ((x-1)+(x+1)+(y-1))/3
else :
return ((x-1)+(x+1)+(y-1)+(y+1))/4
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
for any (x,y) if NAN you can impute to average of surrounding pixels as:
if((x==0 & y==0):
return (x+1)+(y+1))/2
else if(x==x_max & y==y_max):
return (x-1)+(y-1))/2
else if(x==0 & y==y_max):
return (x+1)+(y-1))/2
else if(x==x_max & y==0):
return (x-1)+(y+1))/2
else if(x==0):
return ((x+1)+(y-1)+(y+1))/3
else if(x==x_max):
return ((x-1)+(y-1)+(y+1))/3
else if(y==0):
return ((x+1)+(x-1)+(y+1))/3
else if(y==y_max):
return ((x-1)+(x+1)+(y-1))/3
else :
return ((x-1)+(x+1)+(y-1)+(y+1))/4
$endgroup$
for any (x,y) if NAN you can impute to average of surrounding pixels as:
if((x==0 & y==0):
return (x+1)+(y+1))/2
else if(x==x_max & y==y_max):
return (x-1)+(y-1))/2
else if(x==0 & y==y_max):
return (x+1)+(y-1))/2
else if(x==x_max & y==0):
return (x-1)+(y+1))/2
else if(x==0):
return ((x+1)+(y-1)+(y+1))/3
else if(x==x_max):
return ((x-1)+(y-1)+(y+1))/3
else if(y==0):
return ((x+1)+(x-1)+(y+1))/3
else if(y==y_max):
return ((x-1)+(x+1)+(y-1))/3
else :
return ((x-1)+(x+1)+(y-1)+(y+1))/4
edited May 4 at 13:32
Mark.F
1,1491822
1,1491822
answered May 4 at 12:49
AnshAnsh
191
191
add a comment |
add a comment |
$begingroup$
If adjacent rows are adjacent pixels that I'd just use the average value of the adjacent pixels. That seems like it would make sense for an image, and would certainly be hard for the human eye to see.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
If adjacent rows are adjacent pixels that I'd just use the average value of the adjacent pixels. That seems like it would make sense for an image, and would certainly be hard for the human eye to see.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
If adjacent rows are adjacent pixels that I'd just use the average value of the adjacent pixels. That seems like it would make sense for an image, and would certainly be hard for the human eye to see.
$endgroup$
If adjacent rows are adjacent pixels that I'd just use the average value of the adjacent pixels. That seems like it would make sense for an image, and would certainly be hard for the human eye to see.
answered May 4 at 12:13
bstrainbstrain
17616
17616
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Data Science Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fdatascience.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f51375%2fhow-to-replace-nan-values-for-image-data%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown