A Mathematical Discussion: Fill in the Blank





.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty{
margin-bottom:0;
}
.everyonelovesstackoverflow{position:absolute;height:1px;width:1px;opacity:0;top:0;left:0;pointer-events:none;}








9












$begingroup$


I originally saw this on r/puzzles, and thought it deserved a place here. I have a solution to this puzzle, but it's really long and ugly. If anyone comes up with something simple, please share!





Two perfect logicians have the following conversation. Fill in the blank with the correct number.



Ana: "Did you know that your favorite number is the sum of the ages of my stuffed animal turtles, and that my favorite number is their product?"



Beth: "I wouldn't know because I don't know your favorite number. If you tell me your favorite number and how many stuffed animal turtles you have, would I know the ages of your stuffed animal turtles?"



Ana: "No."



Beth: "Oh, so your favorite number is ________!"










share|improve this question









$endgroup$














  • $begingroup$
    Is 0 a possible value for age, or are those all strictly positive?
    $endgroup$
    – elias
    May 27 at 9:46










  • $begingroup$
    @elias Strictly positive integers.
    $endgroup$
    – greenturtle3141
    May 27 at 16:14


















9












$begingroup$


I originally saw this on r/puzzles, and thought it deserved a place here. I have a solution to this puzzle, but it's really long and ugly. If anyone comes up with something simple, please share!





Two perfect logicians have the following conversation. Fill in the blank with the correct number.



Ana: "Did you know that your favorite number is the sum of the ages of my stuffed animal turtles, and that my favorite number is their product?"



Beth: "I wouldn't know because I don't know your favorite number. If you tell me your favorite number and how many stuffed animal turtles you have, would I know the ages of your stuffed animal turtles?"



Ana: "No."



Beth: "Oh, so your favorite number is ________!"










share|improve this question









$endgroup$














  • $begingroup$
    Is 0 a possible value for age, or are those all strictly positive?
    $endgroup$
    – elias
    May 27 at 9:46










  • $begingroup$
    @elias Strictly positive integers.
    $endgroup$
    – greenturtle3141
    May 27 at 16:14














9












9








9


3



$begingroup$


I originally saw this on r/puzzles, and thought it deserved a place here. I have a solution to this puzzle, but it's really long and ugly. If anyone comes up with something simple, please share!





Two perfect logicians have the following conversation. Fill in the blank with the correct number.



Ana: "Did you know that your favorite number is the sum of the ages of my stuffed animal turtles, and that my favorite number is their product?"



Beth: "I wouldn't know because I don't know your favorite number. If you tell me your favorite number and how many stuffed animal turtles you have, would I know the ages of your stuffed animal turtles?"



Ana: "No."



Beth: "Oh, so your favorite number is ________!"










share|improve this question









$endgroup$




I originally saw this on r/puzzles, and thought it deserved a place here. I have a solution to this puzzle, but it's really long and ugly. If anyone comes up with something simple, please share!





Two perfect logicians have the following conversation. Fill in the blank with the correct number.



Ana: "Did you know that your favorite number is the sum of the ages of my stuffed animal turtles, and that my favorite number is their product?"



Beth: "I wouldn't know because I don't know your favorite number. If you tell me your favorite number and how many stuffed animal turtles you have, would I know the ages of your stuffed animal turtles?"



Ana: "No."



Beth: "Oh, so your favorite number is ________!"







mathematics logical-deduction






share|improve this question













share|improve this question











share|improve this question




share|improve this question










asked May 27 at 8:03









greenturtle3141greenturtle3141

6,8691 gold badge26 silver badges59 bronze badges




6,8691 gold badge26 silver badges59 bronze badges















  • $begingroup$
    Is 0 a possible value for age, or are those all strictly positive?
    $endgroup$
    – elias
    May 27 at 9:46










  • $begingroup$
    @elias Strictly positive integers.
    $endgroup$
    – greenturtle3141
    May 27 at 16:14


















  • $begingroup$
    Is 0 a possible value for age, or are those all strictly positive?
    $endgroup$
    – elias
    May 27 at 9:46










  • $begingroup$
    @elias Strictly positive integers.
    $endgroup$
    – greenturtle3141
    May 27 at 16:14
















$begingroup$
Is 0 a possible value for age, or are those all strictly positive?
$endgroup$
– elias
May 27 at 9:46




$begingroup$
Is 0 a possible value for age, or are those all strictly positive?
$endgroup$
– elias
May 27 at 9:46












$begingroup$
@elias Strictly positive integers.
$endgroup$
– greenturtle3141
May 27 at 16:14




$begingroup$
@elias Strictly positive integers.
$endgroup$
– greenturtle3141
May 27 at 16:14










3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes


















7














$begingroup$

We will assume that all the ages of the stuffed animals are natural numbers (i.e. cannot be 0). Removing this assumption makes the problem impossible.



Let $T={...}$ be the set of ages of the stuffed animals, $P$ be their product, and $S$ be their sum.



Initially, Beth knows $S$, but not $P$. For some $S$, we need to find a value of $P$ and $|T|$ such that knowing these things does not uniquely identify the members of $T$. Moreover, we know that such a combination is unique for $S$; if it were not unique, then Beth would not be able to determine $P$ simply by knowing that she couldn't determine the values of $T$ knowing $P$ and $|T|$.



First Solution



Lets try some values for $S$. It turns out we need to go as high as




$S=12$




before we find a case of two sets of numbers with the same number of elements and the same product. These are;




$$T={1,3,4,4} implies P=48$$
$$T={2,2,2,6} implies P=48$$




Notice that they have the same sum, product, and number of elements. If Beth knows the product, sum, and number of elements, she still will not know the values.



However, does Beth knowing this help? Only if all other sets of numbers for the sum are uniquely defined. Well, here they are;




- $T={1,1,10} implies P=10$

- $T={1,2,9} implies P=18$

- $T={1,3,8} implies P=24$

- $T={1,4,7} implies P=28$

- $T={1,5,6} implies P=30$

- $T={2,2,8} implies P=32$

- $T={2,3,7} implies P=42$

- $T={2,4,6} implies P=48$

- $T={2,5,5} implies P=50$

- $T={3,3,6} implies P=54$

- $T={3,4,5} implies P=60$

- $T={4,4,4} implies P=64$

- $T={1,1,1,9} implies P=9$

- $T={1,1,2,8} implies P=16$

- $T={1,1,3,7} implies P=21$

- $T={1,1,4,6} implies P=24$

- $T={1,1,5,5} implies P=25$

- $T={1,2,2,7} implies P=28$

- $T={1,2,3,6} implies P=36$

- $T={1,2,4,5} implies P=40$

- $T={1,3,3,5} implies P=45$

- $T={1,3,4,4} implies P=48$ SAME!!

- $T={2,2,2,6} implies P=48$ SAME!!

- $T={2,2,3,5} implies P=60$

- $T={2,2,4,4} implies P=64$

- $T={2,3,3,4} implies P=72$

- $T={3,3,3,3} implies P=81$

- $T={1,1,1,1,8} implies P=8$

- $T={1,1,1,2,7} implies P=14$

- $T={1,1,1,3,6} implies P=18$

- $T={1,1,1,4,5} implies P=20$

- $T={1,1,2,2,6} implies P=24$

- $T={1,1,2,3,5} implies P=30$

- $T={1,1,2,4,4} implies P=32$

- $T={1,2,2,2,5} implies P=40$

- $T={1,2,2,3,4} implies P=48$

- $T={2,2,2,2,4} implies P=64$

- $T={2,2,2,3,3} implies P=72$

- $T={1,1,1,1,1,7} implies P=7$

- $T={1,1,1,1,2,6} implies P=12$

- $T={1,1,1,1,3,5} implies P=15$

- $T={1,1,1,1,4,4} implies P=16$

- $T={1,1,1,2,2,5} implies P=20$

- $T={1,1,1,2,3,4} implies P=24$

- $T={1,1,2,2,2,4} implies P=32$

- $T={1,1,2,2,3,3} implies P=36$

- $T={1,2,2,2,2,3} implies P=48$

- $T={2,2,2,2,2,2} implies P=64$




So all other sets have unique products given the same number of elements. Thus, one solution to this puzzle is:




$$S=12$$




Knowing that it is impossible to know $T$ given $|T|$ and $P$ lets Beth determine that




$$P=48$$




since all other combinations of $|T|$ and $P$ uniquely identify $T$.



Is this unique?



However, are there answers larger than this? Lets explore!




Assume $S ge 13$




Now consider:




- $T={1,6,6,S-13} implies P=36 times (S-13)$

- $T={2,2,9,S-13} implies P=36 times (S-13)$

- $T={1,3,4,4,S-12} implies P=48 times (S-12)$

- $T={2,2,2,6,S-12} implies P=48 times (S-12)$




If $T$ is one of the above and Beth is given $S$, $P$ and $|T|$, then there is no way to uniquely identify the set $T$. Likewise, since there are multiple values for $P$, Beth cannot logically determine the true value of $P$ even if she knows she can't get $T$ from knowing $|T|$ and $P$.



Thus we can rule out




$S ge 13$




Making,




$$S=12, P=48$$




a unique solution.






share|improve this answer











$endgroup$















  • $begingroup$
    This should be the correct answer, you just need to show that nothing greater than 12 for the sum can't work. In addition I'm paranoid, so I'll wait for consensus from everyone else.
    $endgroup$
    – greenturtle3141
    May 27 at 16:27










  • $begingroup$
    I have ruled out $S=13$ since there are multiple possibilities.
    $endgroup$
    – Trenin
    May 27 at 17:49










  • $begingroup$
    So I originally solved this by starting from $S=1$ and bashing through every possibility, working my way up. I guess there doesn't seem to be an easy, intuitive way to obtain 12, unless anyone else has any better ideas.
    $endgroup$
    – greenturtle3141
    May 27 at 22:14










  • $begingroup$
    @greenturtle3141 To be rigorous, I think you need to go through them all. I don't see any mathematical property that can be exploited to find a set of numbers with the same sum and product.
    $endgroup$
    – Trenin
    May 28 at 11:58



















4














$begingroup$

Edit: Trenin has found a smaller value for $X$ which works and I think is correct. Here is the reasoning as to why.



Ana's favourite number is




$48$




Reasoning




As athin pointed out, we are trying to find $X$, $Y$, and $k$ such that there are at least $2$ possibilities of $T = {T_1, T_2, dots, T_k}$ that satisfies:

$(1)~T_1 + T_2 + dots + T_k = X$
$(2)~T_1 times T_2 times dots times T_k = Y$



Additionally, for the given value of $X$, there must not be a second $Y$ and $k$ for which there are also at least $2$ possibilities of the above occurring. Otherwise, Beth cannot determine the product at the end.


Suppose that Beth's number $X > 14$.
Then, we find that the following two sets of values for $T_i$ have the same sum and product $(2,2,9,X-13)$ and $(1,6,6,X-13)$. Additionally, we have two more sets which also have the same sum and product $(2,2,10, X-14)$ and $(1,5,8,X-14)$. So, in general, Beth cannot determine the product uniquely from the information she's been given.

In the case $X=14$ we have the pair of sets $(1,2,2,9)$ and $(1,1,6,6)$ with product $36$ and the pair of sets $(1,5,8)$ and $(2,2,10)$ with product $40$. Hence, in this case, Beth would not be able to determine whether the product is $36$ or $40$. If $X=13$, we have the pair of sets $(1,1,3,4,4)$ and $(1,2,2,2,6)$ with product of $48$ and the pair of sets $(1,6,6)$ and $(2,9,9)$ with product $36$ so Beth would not be able to determine whether the product is $36$ or $48$ in this case. Overall this implies $X < 13$.

As far as I'm aware, the solution given by Trenin is the only one for the system above with $X < 13$.




Rogue edge case




There is an edge case in the scenario where $X>14$. Namely, if $X=23$, then both products are $360$. But in this case, we can construct another pair of solutions $(2,2,5,5,9)$ and $(1,5,5,6,6)$ whose product is $900$.







share|improve this answer











$endgroup$















  • $begingroup$
    I knew it wasn’t unique to the classic answer, I just was too lazy to find a counter example. Great find!
    $endgroup$
    – El-Guest
    May 27 at 13:25










  • $begingroup$
    But what if Beth's number is 12 and Ana's is 48?
    $endgroup$
    – Trenin
    May 27 at 16:19










  • $begingroup$
    @Trenin You're right, I hadn't spotted this smaller solution.
    $endgroup$
    – hexomino
    May 27 at 16:56



















2














$begingroup$

Partial Solution



Beth's favorite number is:




Not $1$ or $2$, because then Ana's favorite number is trivial to be $1$. This is because of $1 = 1$ and $2 = 1 + 1$. (In case there can be only $1$ turtle, then $2$ is still possible.)


Thus, Beth's favorite number is $X$ where $X geq 3$. This is because of $X$ can be represented as at least $1 + 1 + dots + 1$ and $1 + (X-1)$ so there are at least $2$ possibilities of Ana's favorite number (which is $1$ or $X-1$).




Because Beth still won't know the ages of stuffed animal turtles, given Ana's favorite number and how many stuffed animal turtles, then we can conclude that:




Let's say there are $k$ turtles. If the turtles' ages are $T = {T_1, T_2, dots, T_k}$; there should be at least $2$ possibilities of $T$ where both sum and product of them are same.




Also as @hexomino pointed out from comments, Beth then know the answer, means:




For such sum, the product should be unique.




To sums up, we want to find:




$X$, $Y$, and $k$ such that there are at least $2$ possibilities of $T = {T_1, T_2, dots, T_k}$ that satisfies:

$(1)~X geq 3$
$(2)~T_1 + T_2 + dots + T_k = X$
$(3)~T_1 times T_2 times dots times T_k = Y$
$(4)$ There is no other $Y'$ and $k'$ for such $X$ so that $(2), (3)$ are also satisfied for given $Y'$ and $k'$.







share|improve this answer











$endgroup$











  • 1




    $begingroup$
    I think there is an additional restriction in that once you know $X$, you can determine $Y$ because Beth knows exactly the product at the end. This means that there is an $(X,Y,k)$ with at least two solutions and any other such triplet including $X$ has the same value for $Y$. Also we must have the $k >2$, otherwise Beth could determine the turtle values exactly from knowing $Y$ and $k$.
    $endgroup$
    – hexomino
    May 27 at 11:44










  • $begingroup$
    @hexomino ah, clever! I should try to fix this..
    $endgroup$
    – athin
    May 27 at 11:48










  • $begingroup$
    @hexomino wait no, even if you know $X$, $Y$ still couldn't be determined as indicated by first spoiler..
    $endgroup$
    – athin
    May 27 at 11:52










  • $begingroup$
    so Beth's first question is essentially "If you tell me $Y$ and $k$ can I determine the ages?" If $k<3$, then Ana would say "yes" because it's a determined system.
    $endgroup$
    – hexomino
    May 27 at 11:56






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    As to my first point, take your solution $(X,Y,k) = (31, 720, 3)$. For this to work, you have to know that there is no other solution $(31, Y, k)$ which has two different sums with $Y neq 720$, otherwise Beth cannot determine $Y$. In this instance, there is another solution $(1,5,7,18)$ and $(2,3,5,21)$ which has sum $31$, product $630$ $k=4$.
    $endgroup$
    – hexomino
    May 27 at 12:04













Your Answer








StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "559"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/"u003ecc by-sa 4.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});















draft saved

draft discarded
















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fpuzzling.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f84401%2fa-mathematical-discussion-fill-in-the-blank%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes








3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









7














$begingroup$

We will assume that all the ages of the stuffed animals are natural numbers (i.e. cannot be 0). Removing this assumption makes the problem impossible.



Let $T={...}$ be the set of ages of the stuffed animals, $P$ be their product, and $S$ be their sum.



Initially, Beth knows $S$, but not $P$. For some $S$, we need to find a value of $P$ and $|T|$ such that knowing these things does not uniquely identify the members of $T$. Moreover, we know that such a combination is unique for $S$; if it were not unique, then Beth would not be able to determine $P$ simply by knowing that she couldn't determine the values of $T$ knowing $P$ and $|T|$.



First Solution



Lets try some values for $S$. It turns out we need to go as high as




$S=12$




before we find a case of two sets of numbers with the same number of elements and the same product. These are;




$$T={1,3,4,4} implies P=48$$
$$T={2,2,2,6} implies P=48$$




Notice that they have the same sum, product, and number of elements. If Beth knows the product, sum, and number of elements, she still will not know the values.



However, does Beth knowing this help? Only if all other sets of numbers for the sum are uniquely defined. Well, here they are;




- $T={1,1,10} implies P=10$

- $T={1,2,9} implies P=18$

- $T={1,3,8} implies P=24$

- $T={1,4,7} implies P=28$

- $T={1,5,6} implies P=30$

- $T={2,2,8} implies P=32$

- $T={2,3,7} implies P=42$

- $T={2,4,6} implies P=48$

- $T={2,5,5} implies P=50$

- $T={3,3,6} implies P=54$

- $T={3,4,5} implies P=60$

- $T={4,4,4} implies P=64$

- $T={1,1,1,9} implies P=9$

- $T={1,1,2,8} implies P=16$

- $T={1,1,3,7} implies P=21$

- $T={1,1,4,6} implies P=24$

- $T={1,1,5,5} implies P=25$

- $T={1,2,2,7} implies P=28$

- $T={1,2,3,6} implies P=36$

- $T={1,2,4,5} implies P=40$

- $T={1,3,3,5} implies P=45$

- $T={1,3,4,4} implies P=48$ SAME!!

- $T={2,2,2,6} implies P=48$ SAME!!

- $T={2,2,3,5} implies P=60$

- $T={2,2,4,4} implies P=64$

- $T={2,3,3,4} implies P=72$

- $T={3,3,3,3} implies P=81$

- $T={1,1,1,1,8} implies P=8$

- $T={1,1,1,2,7} implies P=14$

- $T={1,1,1,3,6} implies P=18$

- $T={1,1,1,4,5} implies P=20$

- $T={1,1,2,2,6} implies P=24$

- $T={1,1,2,3,5} implies P=30$

- $T={1,1,2,4,4} implies P=32$

- $T={1,2,2,2,5} implies P=40$

- $T={1,2,2,3,4} implies P=48$

- $T={2,2,2,2,4} implies P=64$

- $T={2,2,2,3,3} implies P=72$

- $T={1,1,1,1,1,7} implies P=7$

- $T={1,1,1,1,2,6} implies P=12$

- $T={1,1,1,1,3,5} implies P=15$

- $T={1,1,1,1,4,4} implies P=16$

- $T={1,1,1,2,2,5} implies P=20$

- $T={1,1,1,2,3,4} implies P=24$

- $T={1,1,2,2,2,4} implies P=32$

- $T={1,1,2,2,3,3} implies P=36$

- $T={1,2,2,2,2,3} implies P=48$

- $T={2,2,2,2,2,2} implies P=64$




So all other sets have unique products given the same number of elements. Thus, one solution to this puzzle is:




$$S=12$$




Knowing that it is impossible to know $T$ given $|T|$ and $P$ lets Beth determine that




$$P=48$$




since all other combinations of $|T|$ and $P$ uniquely identify $T$.



Is this unique?



However, are there answers larger than this? Lets explore!




Assume $S ge 13$




Now consider:




- $T={1,6,6,S-13} implies P=36 times (S-13)$

- $T={2,2,9,S-13} implies P=36 times (S-13)$

- $T={1,3,4,4,S-12} implies P=48 times (S-12)$

- $T={2,2,2,6,S-12} implies P=48 times (S-12)$




If $T$ is one of the above and Beth is given $S$, $P$ and $|T|$, then there is no way to uniquely identify the set $T$. Likewise, since there are multiple values for $P$, Beth cannot logically determine the true value of $P$ even if she knows she can't get $T$ from knowing $|T|$ and $P$.



Thus we can rule out




$S ge 13$




Making,




$$S=12, P=48$$




a unique solution.






share|improve this answer











$endgroup$















  • $begingroup$
    This should be the correct answer, you just need to show that nothing greater than 12 for the sum can't work. In addition I'm paranoid, so I'll wait for consensus from everyone else.
    $endgroup$
    – greenturtle3141
    May 27 at 16:27










  • $begingroup$
    I have ruled out $S=13$ since there are multiple possibilities.
    $endgroup$
    – Trenin
    May 27 at 17:49










  • $begingroup$
    So I originally solved this by starting from $S=1$ and bashing through every possibility, working my way up. I guess there doesn't seem to be an easy, intuitive way to obtain 12, unless anyone else has any better ideas.
    $endgroup$
    – greenturtle3141
    May 27 at 22:14










  • $begingroup$
    @greenturtle3141 To be rigorous, I think you need to go through them all. I don't see any mathematical property that can be exploited to find a set of numbers with the same sum and product.
    $endgroup$
    – Trenin
    May 28 at 11:58
















7














$begingroup$

We will assume that all the ages of the stuffed animals are natural numbers (i.e. cannot be 0). Removing this assumption makes the problem impossible.



Let $T={...}$ be the set of ages of the stuffed animals, $P$ be their product, and $S$ be their sum.



Initially, Beth knows $S$, but not $P$. For some $S$, we need to find a value of $P$ and $|T|$ such that knowing these things does not uniquely identify the members of $T$. Moreover, we know that such a combination is unique for $S$; if it were not unique, then Beth would not be able to determine $P$ simply by knowing that she couldn't determine the values of $T$ knowing $P$ and $|T|$.



First Solution



Lets try some values for $S$. It turns out we need to go as high as




$S=12$




before we find a case of two sets of numbers with the same number of elements and the same product. These are;




$$T={1,3,4,4} implies P=48$$
$$T={2,2,2,6} implies P=48$$




Notice that they have the same sum, product, and number of elements. If Beth knows the product, sum, and number of elements, she still will not know the values.



However, does Beth knowing this help? Only if all other sets of numbers for the sum are uniquely defined. Well, here they are;




- $T={1,1,10} implies P=10$

- $T={1,2,9} implies P=18$

- $T={1,3,8} implies P=24$

- $T={1,4,7} implies P=28$

- $T={1,5,6} implies P=30$

- $T={2,2,8} implies P=32$

- $T={2,3,7} implies P=42$

- $T={2,4,6} implies P=48$

- $T={2,5,5} implies P=50$

- $T={3,3,6} implies P=54$

- $T={3,4,5} implies P=60$

- $T={4,4,4} implies P=64$

- $T={1,1,1,9} implies P=9$

- $T={1,1,2,8} implies P=16$

- $T={1,1,3,7} implies P=21$

- $T={1,1,4,6} implies P=24$

- $T={1,1,5,5} implies P=25$

- $T={1,2,2,7} implies P=28$

- $T={1,2,3,6} implies P=36$

- $T={1,2,4,5} implies P=40$

- $T={1,3,3,5} implies P=45$

- $T={1,3,4,4} implies P=48$ SAME!!

- $T={2,2,2,6} implies P=48$ SAME!!

- $T={2,2,3,5} implies P=60$

- $T={2,2,4,4} implies P=64$

- $T={2,3,3,4} implies P=72$

- $T={3,3,3,3} implies P=81$

- $T={1,1,1,1,8} implies P=8$

- $T={1,1,1,2,7} implies P=14$

- $T={1,1,1,3,6} implies P=18$

- $T={1,1,1,4,5} implies P=20$

- $T={1,1,2,2,6} implies P=24$

- $T={1,1,2,3,5} implies P=30$

- $T={1,1,2,4,4} implies P=32$

- $T={1,2,2,2,5} implies P=40$

- $T={1,2,2,3,4} implies P=48$

- $T={2,2,2,2,4} implies P=64$

- $T={2,2,2,3,3} implies P=72$

- $T={1,1,1,1,1,7} implies P=7$

- $T={1,1,1,1,2,6} implies P=12$

- $T={1,1,1,1,3,5} implies P=15$

- $T={1,1,1,1,4,4} implies P=16$

- $T={1,1,1,2,2,5} implies P=20$

- $T={1,1,1,2,3,4} implies P=24$

- $T={1,1,2,2,2,4} implies P=32$

- $T={1,1,2,2,3,3} implies P=36$

- $T={1,2,2,2,2,3} implies P=48$

- $T={2,2,2,2,2,2} implies P=64$




So all other sets have unique products given the same number of elements. Thus, one solution to this puzzle is:




$$S=12$$




Knowing that it is impossible to know $T$ given $|T|$ and $P$ lets Beth determine that




$$P=48$$




since all other combinations of $|T|$ and $P$ uniquely identify $T$.



Is this unique?



However, are there answers larger than this? Lets explore!




Assume $S ge 13$




Now consider:




- $T={1,6,6,S-13} implies P=36 times (S-13)$

- $T={2,2,9,S-13} implies P=36 times (S-13)$

- $T={1,3,4,4,S-12} implies P=48 times (S-12)$

- $T={2,2,2,6,S-12} implies P=48 times (S-12)$




If $T$ is one of the above and Beth is given $S$, $P$ and $|T|$, then there is no way to uniquely identify the set $T$. Likewise, since there are multiple values for $P$, Beth cannot logically determine the true value of $P$ even if she knows she can't get $T$ from knowing $|T|$ and $P$.



Thus we can rule out




$S ge 13$




Making,




$$S=12, P=48$$




a unique solution.






share|improve this answer











$endgroup$















  • $begingroup$
    This should be the correct answer, you just need to show that nothing greater than 12 for the sum can't work. In addition I'm paranoid, so I'll wait for consensus from everyone else.
    $endgroup$
    – greenturtle3141
    May 27 at 16:27










  • $begingroup$
    I have ruled out $S=13$ since there are multiple possibilities.
    $endgroup$
    – Trenin
    May 27 at 17:49










  • $begingroup$
    So I originally solved this by starting from $S=1$ and bashing through every possibility, working my way up. I guess there doesn't seem to be an easy, intuitive way to obtain 12, unless anyone else has any better ideas.
    $endgroup$
    – greenturtle3141
    May 27 at 22:14










  • $begingroup$
    @greenturtle3141 To be rigorous, I think you need to go through them all. I don't see any mathematical property that can be exploited to find a set of numbers with the same sum and product.
    $endgroup$
    – Trenin
    May 28 at 11:58














7














7










7







$begingroup$

We will assume that all the ages of the stuffed animals are natural numbers (i.e. cannot be 0). Removing this assumption makes the problem impossible.



Let $T={...}$ be the set of ages of the stuffed animals, $P$ be their product, and $S$ be their sum.



Initially, Beth knows $S$, but not $P$. For some $S$, we need to find a value of $P$ and $|T|$ such that knowing these things does not uniquely identify the members of $T$. Moreover, we know that such a combination is unique for $S$; if it were not unique, then Beth would not be able to determine $P$ simply by knowing that she couldn't determine the values of $T$ knowing $P$ and $|T|$.



First Solution



Lets try some values for $S$. It turns out we need to go as high as




$S=12$




before we find a case of two sets of numbers with the same number of elements and the same product. These are;




$$T={1,3,4,4} implies P=48$$
$$T={2,2,2,6} implies P=48$$




Notice that they have the same sum, product, and number of elements. If Beth knows the product, sum, and number of elements, she still will not know the values.



However, does Beth knowing this help? Only if all other sets of numbers for the sum are uniquely defined. Well, here they are;




- $T={1,1,10} implies P=10$

- $T={1,2,9} implies P=18$

- $T={1,3,8} implies P=24$

- $T={1,4,7} implies P=28$

- $T={1,5,6} implies P=30$

- $T={2,2,8} implies P=32$

- $T={2,3,7} implies P=42$

- $T={2,4,6} implies P=48$

- $T={2,5,5} implies P=50$

- $T={3,3,6} implies P=54$

- $T={3,4,5} implies P=60$

- $T={4,4,4} implies P=64$

- $T={1,1,1,9} implies P=9$

- $T={1,1,2,8} implies P=16$

- $T={1,1,3,7} implies P=21$

- $T={1,1,4,6} implies P=24$

- $T={1,1,5,5} implies P=25$

- $T={1,2,2,7} implies P=28$

- $T={1,2,3,6} implies P=36$

- $T={1,2,4,5} implies P=40$

- $T={1,3,3,5} implies P=45$

- $T={1,3,4,4} implies P=48$ SAME!!

- $T={2,2,2,6} implies P=48$ SAME!!

- $T={2,2,3,5} implies P=60$

- $T={2,2,4,4} implies P=64$

- $T={2,3,3,4} implies P=72$

- $T={3,3,3,3} implies P=81$

- $T={1,1,1,1,8} implies P=8$

- $T={1,1,1,2,7} implies P=14$

- $T={1,1,1,3,6} implies P=18$

- $T={1,1,1,4,5} implies P=20$

- $T={1,1,2,2,6} implies P=24$

- $T={1,1,2,3,5} implies P=30$

- $T={1,1,2,4,4} implies P=32$

- $T={1,2,2,2,5} implies P=40$

- $T={1,2,2,3,4} implies P=48$

- $T={2,2,2,2,4} implies P=64$

- $T={2,2,2,3,3} implies P=72$

- $T={1,1,1,1,1,7} implies P=7$

- $T={1,1,1,1,2,6} implies P=12$

- $T={1,1,1,1,3,5} implies P=15$

- $T={1,1,1,1,4,4} implies P=16$

- $T={1,1,1,2,2,5} implies P=20$

- $T={1,1,1,2,3,4} implies P=24$

- $T={1,1,2,2,2,4} implies P=32$

- $T={1,1,2,2,3,3} implies P=36$

- $T={1,2,2,2,2,3} implies P=48$

- $T={2,2,2,2,2,2} implies P=64$




So all other sets have unique products given the same number of elements. Thus, one solution to this puzzle is:




$$S=12$$




Knowing that it is impossible to know $T$ given $|T|$ and $P$ lets Beth determine that




$$P=48$$




since all other combinations of $|T|$ and $P$ uniquely identify $T$.



Is this unique?



However, are there answers larger than this? Lets explore!




Assume $S ge 13$




Now consider:




- $T={1,6,6,S-13} implies P=36 times (S-13)$

- $T={2,2,9,S-13} implies P=36 times (S-13)$

- $T={1,3,4,4,S-12} implies P=48 times (S-12)$

- $T={2,2,2,6,S-12} implies P=48 times (S-12)$




If $T$ is one of the above and Beth is given $S$, $P$ and $|T|$, then there is no way to uniquely identify the set $T$. Likewise, since there are multiple values for $P$, Beth cannot logically determine the true value of $P$ even if she knows she can't get $T$ from knowing $|T|$ and $P$.



Thus we can rule out




$S ge 13$




Making,




$$S=12, P=48$$




a unique solution.






share|improve this answer











$endgroup$



We will assume that all the ages of the stuffed animals are natural numbers (i.e. cannot be 0). Removing this assumption makes the problem impossible.



Let $T={...}$ be the set of ages of the stuffed animals, $P$ be their product, and $S$ be their sum.



Initially, Beth knows $S$, but not $P$. For some $S$, we need to find a value of $P$ and $|T|$ such that knowing these things does not uniquely identify the members of $T$. Moreover, we know that such a combination is unique for $S$; if it were not unique, then Beth would not be able to determine $P$ simply by knowing that she couldn't determine the values of $T$ knowing $P$ and $|T|$.



First Solution



Lets try some values for $S$. It turns out we need to go as high as




$S=12$




before we find a case of two sets of numbers with the same number of elements and the same product. These are;




$$T={1,3,4,4} implies P=48$$
$$T={2,2,2,6} implies P=48$$




Notice that they have the same sum, product, and number of elements. If Beth knows the product, sum, and number of elements, she still will not know the values.



However, does Beth knowing this help? Only if all other sets of numbers for the sum are uniquely defined. Well, here they are;




- $T={1,1,10} implies P=10$

- $T={1,2,9} implies P=18$

- $T={1,3,8} implies P=24$

- $T={1,4,7} implies P=28$

- $T={1,5,6} implies P=30$

- $T={2,2,8} implies P=32$

- $T={2,3,7} implies P=42$

- $T={2,4,6} implies P=48$

- $T={2,5,5} implies P=50$

- $T={3,3,6} implies P=54$

- $T={3,4,5} implies P=60$

- $T={4,4,4} implies P=64$

- $T={1,1,1,9} implies P=9$

- $T={1,1,2,8} implies P=16$

- $T={1,1,3,7} implies P=21$

- $T={1,1,4,6} implies P=24$

- $T={1,1,5,5} implies P=25$

- $T={1,2,2,7} implies P=28$

- $T={1,2,3,6} implies P=36$

- $T={1,2,4,5} implies P=40$

- $T={1,3,3,5} implies P=45$

- $T={1,3,4,4} implies P=48$ SAME!!

- $T={2,2,2,6} implies P=48$ SAME!!

- $T={2,2,3,5} implies P=60$

- $T={2,2,4,4} implies P=64$

- $T={2,3,3,4} implies P=72$

- $T={3,3,3,3} implies P=81$

- $T={1,1,1,1,8} implies P=8$

- $T={1,1,1,2,7} implies P=14$

- $T={1,1,1,3,6} implies P=18$

- $T={1,1,1,4,5} implies P=20$

- $T={1,1,2,2,6} implies P=24$

- $T={1,1,2,3,5} implies P=30$

- $T={1,1,2,4,4} implies P=32$

- $T={1,2,2,2,5} implies P=40$

- $T={1,2,2,3,4} implies P=48$

- $T={2,2,2,2,4} implies P=64$

- $T={2,2,2,3,3} implies P=72$

- $T={1,1,1,1,1,7} implies P=7$

- $T={1,1,1,1,2,6} implies P=12$

- $T={1,1,1,1,3,5} implies P=15$

- $T={1,1,1,1,4,4} implies P=16$

- $T={1,1,1,2,2,5} implies P=20$

- $T={1,1,1,2,3,4} implies P=24$

- $T={1,1,2,2,2,4} implies P=32$

- $T={1,1,2,2,3,3} implies P=36$

- $T={1,2,2,2,2,3} implies P=48$

- $T={2,2,2,2,2,2} implies P=64$




So all other sets have unique products given the same number of elements. Thus, one solution to this puzzle is:




$$S=12$$




Knowing that it is impossible to know $T$ given $|T|$ and $P$ lets Beth determine that




$$P=48$$




since all other combinations of $|T|$ and $P$ uniquely identify $T$.



Is this unique?



However, are there answers larger than this? Lets explore!




Assume $S ge 13$




Now consider:




- $T={1,6,6,S-13} implies P=36 times (S-13)$

- $T={2,2,9,S-13} implies P=36 times (S-13)$

- $T={1,3,4,4,S-12} implies P=48 times (S-12)$

- $T={2,2,2,6,S-12} implies P=48 times (S-12)$




If $T$ is one of the above and Beth is given $S$, $P$ and $|T|$, then there is no way to uniquely identify the set $T$. Likewise, since there are multiple values for $P$, Beth cannot logically determine the true value of $P$ even if she knows she can't get $T$ from knowing $|T|$ and $P$.



Thus we can rule out




$S ge 13$




Making,




$$S=12, P=48$$




a unique solution.







share|improve this answer














share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer








edited May 27 at 18:12

























answered May 27 at 16:10









TreninTrenin

8,35817 silver badges49 bronze badges




8,35817 silver badges49 bronze badges















  • $begingroup$
    This should be the correct answer, you just need to show that nothing greater than 12 for the sum can't work. In addition I'm paranoid, so I'll wait for consensus from everyone else.
    $endgroup$
    – greenturtle3141
    May 27 at 16:27










  • $begingroup$
    I have ruled out $S=13$ since there are multiple possibilities.
    $endgroup$
    – Trenin
    May 27 at 17:49










  • $begingroup$
    So I originally solved this by starting from $S=1$ and bashing through every possibility, working my way up. I guess there doesn't seem to be an easy, intuitive way to obtain 12, unless anyone else has any better ideas.
    $endgroup$
    – greenturtle3141
    May 27 at 22:14










  • $begingroup$
    @greenturtle3141 To be rigorous, I think you need to go through them all. I don't see any mathematical property that can be exploited to find a set of numbers with the same sum and product.
    $endgroup$
    – Trenin
    May 28 at 11:58


















  • $begingroup$
    This should be the correct answer, you just need to show that nothing greater than 12 for the sum can't work. In addition I'm paranoid, so I'll wait for consensus from everyone else.
    $endgroup$
    – greenturtle3141
    May 27 at 16:27










  • $begingroup$
    I have ruled out $S=13$ since there are multiple possibilities.
    $endgroup$
    – Trenin
    May 27 at 17:49










  • $begingroup$
    So I originally solved this by starting from $S=1$ and bashing through every possibility, working my way up. I guess there doesn't seem to be an easy, intuitive way to obtain 12, unless anyone else has any better ideas.
    $endgroup$
    – greenturtle3141
    May 27 at 22:14










  • $begingroup$
    @greenturtle3141 To be rigorous, I think you need to go through them all. I don't see any mathematical property that can be exploited to find a set of numbers with the same sum and product.
    $endgroup$
    – Trenin
    May 28 at 11:58
















$begingroup$
This should be the correct answer, you just need to show that nothing greater than 12 for the sum can't work. In addition I'm paranoid, so I'll wait for consensus from everyone else.
$endgroup$
– greenturtle3141
May 27 at 16:27




$begingroup$
This should be the correct answer, you just need to show that nothing greater than 12 for the sum can't work. In addition I'm paranoid, so I'll wait for consensus from everyone else.
$endgroup$
– greenturtle3141
May 27 at 16:27












$begingroup$
I have ruled out $S=13$ since there are multiple possibilities.
$endgroup$
– Trenin
May 27 at 17:49




$begingroup$
I have ruled out $S=13$ since there are multiple possibilities.
$endgroup$
– Trenin
May 27 at 17:49












$begingroup$
So I originally solved this by starting from $S=1$ and bashing through every possibility, working my way up. I guess there doesn't seem to be an easy, intuitive way to obtain 12, unless anyone else has any better ideas.
$endgroup$
– greenturtle3141
May 27 at 22:14




$begingroup$
So I originally solved this by starting from $S=1$ and bashing through every possibility, working my way up. I guess there doesn't seem to be an easy, intuitive way to obtain 12, unless anyone else has any better ideas.
$endgroup$
– greenturtle3141
May 27 at 22:14












$begingroup$
@greenturtle3141 To be rigorous, I think you need to go through them all. I don't see any mathematical property that can be exploited to find a set of numbers with the same sum and product.
$endgroup$
– Trenin
May 28 at 11:58




$begingroup$
@greenturtle3141 To be rigorous, I think you need to go through them all. I don't see any mathematical property that can be exploited to find a set of numbers with the same sum and product.
$endgroup$
– Trenin
May 28 at 11:58













4














$begingroup$

Edit: Trenin has found a smaller value for $X$ which works and I think is correct. Here is the reasoning as to why.



Ana's favourite number is




$48$




Reasoning




As athin pointed out, we are trying to find $X$, $Y$, and $k$ such that there are at least $2$ possibilities of $T = {T_1, T_2, dots, T_k}$ that satisfies:

$(1)~T_1 + T_2 + dots + T_k = X$
$(2)~T_1 times T_2 times dots times T_k = Y$



Additionally, for the given value of $X$, there must not be a second $Y$ and $k$ for which there are also at least $2$ possibilities of the above occurring. Otherwise, Beth cannot determine the product at the end.


Suppose that Beth's number $X > 14$.
Then, we find that the following two sets of values for $T_i$ have the same sum and product $(2,2,9,X-13)$ and $(1,6,6,X-13)$. Additionally, we have two more sets which also have the same sum and product $(2,2,10, X-14)$ and $(1,5,8,X-14)$. So, in general, Beth cannot determine the product uniquely from the information she's been given.

In the case $X=14$ we have the pair of sets $(1,2,2,9)$ and $(1,1,6,6)$ with product $36$ and the pair of sets $(1,5,8)$ and $(2,2,10)$ with product $40$. Hence, in this case, Beth would not be able to determine whether the product is $36$ or $40$. If $X=13$, we have the pair of sets $(1,1,3,4,4)$ and $(1,2,2,2,6)$ with product of $48$ and the pair of sets $(1,6,6)$ and $(2,9,9)$ with product $36$ so Beth would not be able to determine whether the product is $36$ or $48$ in this case. Overall this implies $X < 13$.

As far as I'm aware, the solution given by Trenin is the only one for the system above with $X < 13$.




Rogue edge case




There is an edge case in the scenario where $X>14$. Namely, if $X=23$, then both products are $360$. But in this case, we can construct another pair of solutions $(2,2,5,5,9)$ and $(1,5,5,6,6)$ whose product is $900$.







share|improve this answer











$endgroup$















  • $begingroup$
    I knew it wasn’t unique to the classic answer, I just was too lazy to find a counter example. Great find!
    $endgroup$
    – El-Guest
    May 27 at 13:25










  • $begingroup$
    But what if Beth's number is 12 and Ana's is 48?
    $endgroup$
    – Trenin
    May 27 at 16:19










  • $begingroup$
    @Trenin You're right, I hadn't spotted this smaller solution.
    $endgroup$
    – hexomino
    May 27 at 16:56
















4














$begingroup$

Edit: Trenin has found a smaller value for $X$ which works and I think is correct. Here is the reasoning as to why.



Ana's favourite number is




$48$




Reasoning




As athin pointed out, we are trying to find $X$, $Y$, and $k$ such that there are at least $2$ possibilities of $T = {T_1, T_2, dots, T_k}$ that satisfies:

$(1)~T_1 + T_2 + dots + T_k = X$
$(2)~T_1 times T_2 times dots times T_k = Y$



Additionally, for the given value of $X$, there must not be a second $Y$ and $k$ for which there are also at least $2$ possibilities of the above occurring. Otherwise, Beth cannot determine the product at the end.


Suppose that Beth's number $X > 14$.
Then, we find that the following two sets of values for $T_i$ have the same sum and product $(2,2,9,X-13)$ and $(1,6,6,X-13)$. Additionally, we have two more sets which also have the same sum and product $(2,2,10, X-14)$ and $(1,5,8,X-14)$. So, in general, Beth cannot determine the product uniquely from the information she's been given.

In the case $X=14$ we have the pair of sets $(1,2,2,9)$ and $(1,1,6,6)$ with product $36$ and the pair of sets $(1,5,8)$ and $(2,2,10)$ with product $40$. Hence, in this case, Beth would not be able to determine whether the product is $36$ or $40$. If $X=13$, we have the pair of sets $(1,1,3,4,4)$ and $(1,2,2,2,6)$ with product of $48$ and the pair of sets $(1,6,6)$ and $(2,9,9)$ with product $36$ so Beth would not be able to determine whether the product is $36$ or $48$ in this case. Overall this implies $X < 13$.

As far as I'm aware, the solution given by Trenin is the only one for the system above with $X < 13$.




Rogue edge case




There is an edge case in the scenario where $X>14$. Namely, if $X=23$, then both products are $360$. But in this case, we can construct another pair of solutions $(2,2,5,5,9)$ and $(1,5,5,6,6)$ whose product is $900$.







share|improve this answer











$endgroup$















  • $begingroup$
    I knew it wasn’t unique to the classic answer, I just was too lazy to find a counter example. Great find!
    $endgroup$
    – El-Guest
    May 27 at 13:25










  • $begingroup$
    But what if Beth's number is 12 and Ana's is 48?
    $endgroup$
    – Trenin
    May 27 at 16:19










  • $begingroup$
    @Trenin You're right, I hadn't spotted this smaller solution.
    $endgroup$
    – hexomino
    May 27 at 16:56














4














4










4







$begingroup$

Edit: Trenin has found a smaller value for $X$ which works and I think is correct. Here is the reasoning as to why.



Ana's favourite number is




$48$




Reasoning




As athin pointed out, we are trying to find $X$, $Y$, and $k$ such that there are at least $2$ possibilities of $T = {T_1, T_2, dots, T_k}$ that satisfies:

$(1)~T_1 + T_2 + dots + T_k = X$
$(2)~T_1 times T_2 times dots times T_k = Y$



Additionally, for the given value of $X$, there must not be a second $Y$ and $k$ for which there are also at least $2$ possibilities of the above occurring. Otherwise, Beth cannot determine the product at the end.


Suppose that Beth's number $X > 14$.
Then, we find that the following two sets of values for $T_i$ have the same sum and product $(2,2,9,X-13)$ and $(1,6,6,X-13)$. Additionally, we have two more sets which also have the same sum and product $(2,2,10, X-14)$ and $(1,5,8,X-14)$. So, in general, Beth cannot determine the product uniquely from the information she's been given.

In the case $X=14$ we have the pair of sets $(1,2,2,9)$ and $(1,1,6,6)$ with product $36$ and the pair of sets $(1,5,8)$ and $(2,2,10)$ with product $40$. Hence, in this case, Beth would not be able to determine whether the product is $36$ or $40$. If $X=13$, we have the pair of sets $(1,1,3,4,4)$ and $(1,2,2,2,6)$ with product of $48$ and the pair of sets $(1,6,6)$ and $(2,9,9)$ with product $36$ so Beth would not be able to determine whether the product is $36$ or $48$ in this case. Overall this implies $X < 13$.

As far as I'm aware, the solution given by Trenin is the only one for the system above with $X < 13$.




Rogue edge case




There is an edge case in the scenario where $X>14$. Namely, if $X=23$, then both products are $360$. But in this case, we can construct another pair of solutions $(2,2,5,5,9)$ and $(1,5,5,6,6)$ whose product is $900$.







share|improve this answer











$endgroup$



Edit: Trenin has found a smaller value for $X$ which works and I think is correct. Here is the reasoning as to why.



Ana's favourite number is




$48$




Reasoning




As athin pointed out, we are trying to find $X$, $Y$, and $k$ such that there are at least $2$ possibilities of $T = {T_1, T_2, dots, T_k}$ that satisfies:

$(1)~T_1 + T_2 + dots + T_k = X$
$(2)~T_1 times T_2 times dots times T_k = Y$



Additionally, for the given value of $X$, there must not be a second $Y$ and $k$ for which there are also at least $2$ possibilities of the above occurring. Otherwise, Beth cannot determine the product at the end.


Suppose that Beth's number $X > 14$.
Then, we find that the following two sets of values for $T_i$ have the same sum and product $(2,2,9,X-13)$ and $(1,6,6,X-13)$. Additionally, we have two more sets which also have the same sum and product $(2,2,10, X-14)$ and $(1,5,8,X-14)$. So, in general, Beth cannot determine the product uniquely from the information she's been given.

In the case $X=14$ we have the pair of sets $(1,2,2,9)$ and $(1,1,6,6)$ with product $36$ and the pair of sets $(1,5,8)$ and $(2,2,10)$ with product $40$. Hence, in this case, Beth would not be able to determine whether the product is $36$ or $40$. If $X=13$, we have the pair of sets $(1,1,3,4,4)$ and $(1,2,2,2,6)$ with product of $48$ and the pair of sets $(1,6,6)$ and $(2,9,9)$ with product $36$ so Beth would not be able to determine whether the product is $36$ or $48$ in this case. Overall this implies $X < 13$.

As far as I'm aware, the solution given by Trenin is the only one for the system above with $X < 13$.




Rogue edge case




There is an edge case in the scenario where $X>14$. Namely, if $X=23$, then both products are $360$. But in this case, we can construct another pair of solutions $(2,2,5,5,9)$ and $(1,5,5,6,6)$ whose product is $900$.








share|improve this answer














share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer








edited May 27 at 17:00

























answered May 27 at 12:17









hexominohexomino

63k6 gold badges181 silver badges281 bronze badges




63k6 gold badges181 silver badges281 bronze badges















  • $begingroup$
    I knew it wasn’t unique to the classic answer, I just was too lazy to find a counter example. Great find!
    $endgroup$
    – El-Guest
    May 27 at 13:25










  • $begingroup$
    But what if Beth's number is 12 and Ana's is 48?
    $endgroup$
    – Trenin
    May 27 at 16:19










  • $begingroup$
    @Trenin You're right, I hadn't spotted this smaller solution.
    $endgroup$
    – hexomino
    May 27 at 16:56


















  • $begingroup$
    I knew it wasn’t unique to the classic answer, I just was too lazy to find a counter example. Great find!
    $endgroup$
    – El-Guest
    May 27 at 13:25










  • $begingroup$
    But what if Beth's number is 12 and Ana's is 48?
    $endgroup$
    – Trenin
    May 27 at 16:19










  • $begingroup$
    @Trenin You're right, I hadn't spotted this smaller solution.
    $endgroup$
    – hexomino
    May 27 at 16:56
















$begingroup$
I knew it wasn’t unique to the classic answer, I just was too lazy to find a counter example. Great find!
$endgroup$
– El-Guest
May 27 at 13:25




$begingroup$
I knew it wasn’t unique to the classic answer, I just was too lazy to find a counter example. Great find!
$endgroup$
– El-Guest
May 27 at 13:25












$begingroup$
But what if Beth's number is 12 and Ana's is 48?
$endgroup$
– Trenin
May 27 at 16:19




$begingroup$
But what if Beth's number is 12 and Ana's is 48?
$endgroup$
– Trenin
May 27 at 16:19












$begingroup$
@Trenin You're right, I hadn't spotted this smaller solution.
$endgroup$
– hexomino
May 27 at 16:56




$begingroup$
@Trenin You're right, I hadn't spotted this smaller solution.
$endgroup$
– hexomino
May 27 at 16:56











2














$begingroup$

Partial Solution



Beth's favorite number is:




Not $1$ or $2$, because then Ana's favorite number is trivial to be $1$. This is because of $1 = 1$ and $2 = 1 + 1$. (In case there can be only $1$ turtle, then $2$ is still possible.)


Thus, Beth's favorite number is $X$ where $X geq 3$. This is because of $X$ can be represented as at least $1 + 1 + dots + 1$ and $1 + (X-1)$ so there are at least $2$ possibilities of Ana's favorite number (which is $1$ or $X-1$).




Because Beth still won't know the ages of stuffed animal turtles, given Ana's favorite number and how many stuffed animal turtles, then we can conclude that:




Let's say there are $k$ turtles. If the turtles' ages are $T = {T_1, T_2, dots, T_k}$; there should be at least $2$ possibilities of $T$ where both sum and product of them are same.




Also as @hexomino pointed out from comments, Beth then know the answer, means:




For such sum, the product should be unique.




To sums up, we want to find:




$X$, $Y$, and $k$ such that there are at least $2$ possibilities of $T = {T_1, T_2, dots, T_k}$ that satisfies:

$(1)~X geq 3$
$(2)~T_1 + T_2 + dots + T_k = X$
$(3)~T_1 times T_2 times dots times T_k = Y$
$(4)$ There is no other $Y'$ and $k'$ for such $X$ so that $(2), (3)$ are also satisfied for given $Y'$ and $k'$.







share|improve this answer











$endgroup$











  • 1




    $begingroup$
    I think there is an additional restriction in that once you know $X$, you can determine $Y$ because Beth knows exactly the product at the end. This means that there is an $(X,Y,k)$ with at least two solutions and any other such triplet including $X$ has the same value for $Y$. Also we must have the $k >2$, otherwise Beth could determine the turtle values exactly from knowing $Y$ and $k$.
    $endgroup$
    – hexomino
    May 27 at 11:44










  • $begingroup$
    @hexomino ah, clever! I should try to fix this..
    $endgroup$
    – athin
    May 27 at 11:48










  • $begingroup$
    @hexomino wait no, even if you know $X$, $Y$ still couldn't be determined as indicated by first spoiler..
    $endgroup$
    – athin
    May 27 at 11:52










  • $begingroup$
    so Beth's first question is essentially "If you tell me $Y$ and $k$ can I determine the ages?" If $k<3$, then Ana would say "yes" because it's a determined system.
    $endgroup$
    – hexomino
    May 27 at 11:56






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    As to my first point, take your solution $(X,Y,k) = (31, 720, 3)$. For this to work, you have to know that there is no other solution $(31, Y, k)$ which has two different sums with $Y neq 720$, otherwise Beth cannot determine $Y$. In this instance, there is another solution $(1,5,7,18)$ and $(2,3,5,21)$ which has sum $31$, product $630$ $k=4$.
    $endgroup$
    – hexomino
    May 27 at 12:04
















2














$begingroup$

Partial Solution



Beth's favorite number is:




Not $1$ or $2$, because then Ana's favorite number is trivial to be $1$. This is because of $1 = 1$ and $2 = 1 + 1$. (In case there can be only $1$ turtle, then $2$ is still possible.)


Thus, Beth's favorite number is $X$ where $X geq 3$. This is because of $X$ can be represented as at least $1 + 1 + dots + 1$ and $1 + (X-1)$ so there are at least $2$ possibilities of Ana's favorite number (which is $1$ or $X-1$).




Because Beth still won't know the ages of stuffed animal turtles, given Ana's favorite number and how many stuffed animal turtles, then we can conclude that:




Let's say there are $k$ turtles. If the turtles' ages are $T = {T_1, T_2, dots, T_k}$; there should be at least $2$ possibilities of $T$ where both sum and product of them are same.




Also as @hexomino pointed out from comments, Beth then know the answer, means:




For such sum, the product should be unique.




To sums up, we want to find:




$X$, $Y$, and $k$ such that there are at least $2$ possibilities of $T = {T_1, T_2, dots, T_k}$ that satisfies:

$(1)~X geq 3$
$(2)~T_1 + T_2 + dots + T_k = X$
$(3)~T_1 times T_2 times dots times T_k = Y$
$(4)$ There is no other $Y'$ and $k'$ for such $X$ so that $(2), (3)$ are also satisfied for given $Y'$ and $k'$.







share|improve this answer











$endgroup$











  • 1




    $begingroup$
    I think there is an additional restriction in that once you know $X$, you can determine $Y$ because Beth knows exactly the product at the end. This means that there is an $(X,Y,k)$ with at least two solutions and any other such triplet including $X$ has the same value for $Y$. Also we must have the $k >2$, otherwise Beth could determine the turtle values exactly from knowing $Y$ and $k$.
    $endgroup$
    – hexomino
    May 27 at 11:44










  • $begingroup$
    @hexomino ah, clever! I should try to fix this..
    $endgroup$
    – athin
    May 27 at 11:48










  • $begingroup$
    @hexomino wait no, even if you know $X$, $Y$ still couldn't be determined as indicated by first spoiler..
    $endgroup$
    – athin
    May 27 at 11:52










  • $begingroup$
    so Beth's first question is essentially "If you tell me $Y$ and $k$ can I determine the ages?" If $k<3$, then Ana would say "yes" because it's a determined system.
    $endgroup$
    – hexomino
    May 27 at 11:56






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    As to my first point, take your solution $(X,Y,k) = (31, 720, 3)$. For this to work, you have to know that there is no other solution $(31, Y, k)$ which has two different sums with $Y neq 720$, otherwise Beth cannot determine $Y$. In this instance, there is another solution $(1,5,7,18)$ and $(2,3,5,21)$ which has sum $31$, product $630$ $k=4$.
    $endgroup$
    – hexomino
    May 27 at 12:04














2














2










2







$begingroup$

Partial Solution



Beth's favorite number is:




Not $1$ or $2$, because then Ana's favorite number is trivial to be $1$. This is because of $1 = 1$ and $2 = 1 + 1$. (In case there can be only $1$ turtle, then $2$ is still possible.)


Thus, Beth's favorite number is $X$ where $X geq 3$. This is because of $X$ can be represented as at least $1 + 1 + dots + 1$ and $1 + (X-1)$ so there are at least $2$ possibilities of Ana's favorite number (which is $1$ or $X-1$).




Because Beth still won't know the ages of stuffed animal turtles, given Ana's favorite number and how many stuffed animal turtles, then we can conclude that:




Let's say there are $k$ turtles. If the turtles' ages are $T = {T_1, T_2, dots, T_k}$; there should be at least $2$ possibilities of $T$ where both sum and product of them are same.




Also as @hexomino pointed out from comments, Beth then know the answer, means:




For such sum, the product should be unique.




To sums up, we want to find:




$X$, $Y$, and $k$ such that there are at least $2$ possibilities of $T = {T_1, T_2, dots, T_k}$ that satisfies:

$(1)~X geq 3$
$(2)~T_1 + T_2 + dots + T_k = X$
$(3)~T_1 times T_2 times dots times T_k = Y$
$(4)$ There is no other $Y'$ and $k'$ for such $X$ so that $(2), (3)$ are also satisfied for given $Y'$ and $k'$.







share|improve this answer











$endgroup$



Partial Solution



Beth's favorite number is:




Not $1$ or $2$, because then Ana's favorite number is trivial to be $1$. This is because of $1 = 1$ and $2 = 1 + 1$. (In case there can be only $1$ turtle, then $2$ is still possible.)


Thus, Beth's favorite number is $X$ where $X geq 3$. This is because of $X$ can be represented as at least $1 + 1 + dots + 1$ and $1 + (X-1)$ so there are at least $2$ possibilities of Ana's favorite number (which is $1$ or $X-1$).




Because Beth still won't know the ages of stuffed animal turtles, given Ana's favorite number and how many stuffed animal turtles, then we can conclude that:




Let's say there are $k$ turtles. If the turtles' ages are $T = {T_1, T_2, dots, T_k}$; there should be at least $2$ possibilities of $T$ where both sum and product of them are same.




Also as @hexomino pointed out from comments, Beth then know the answer, means:




For such sum, the product should be unique.




To sums up, we want to find:




$X$, $Y$, and $k$ such that there are at least $2$ possibilities of $T = {T_1, T_2, dots, T_k}$ that satisfies:

$(1)~X geq 3$
$(2)~T_1 + T_2 + dots + T_k = X$
$(3)~T_1 times T_2 times dots times T_k = Y$
$(4)$ There is no other $Y'$ and $k'$ for such $X$ so that $(2), (3)$ are also satisfied for given $Y'$ and $k'$.








share|improve this answer














share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer








edited May 27 at 12:15

























answered May 27 at 10:52









athinathin

15k3 gold badges44 silver badges115 bronze badges




15k3 gold badges44 silver badges115 bronze badges











  • 1




    $begingroup$
    I think there is an additional restriction in that once you know $X$, you can determine $Y$ because Beth knows exactly the product at the end. This means that there is an $(X,Y,k)$ with at least two solutions and any other such triplet including $X$ has the same value for $Y$. Also we must have the $k >2$, otherwise Beth could determine the turtle values exactly from knowing $Y$ and $k$.
    $endgroup$
    – hexomino
    May 27 at 11:44










  • $begingroup$
    @hexomino ah, clever! I should try to fix this..
    $endgroup$
    – athin
    May 27 at 11:48










  • $begingroup$
    @hexomino wait no, even if you know $X$, $Y$ still couldn't be determined as indicated by first spoiler..
    $endgroup$
    – athin
    May 27 at 11:52










  • $begingroup$
    so Beth's first question is essentially "If you tell me $Y$ and $k$ can I determine the ages?" If $k<3$, then Ana would say "yes" because it's a determined system.
    $endgroup$
    – hexomino
    May 27 at 11:56






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    As to my first point, take your solution $(X,Y,k) = (31, 720, 3)$. For this to work, you have to know that there is no other solution $(31, Y, k)$ which has two different sums with $Y neq 720$, otherwise Beth cannot determine $Y$. In this instance, there is another solution $(1,5,7,18)$ and $(2,3,5,21)$ which has sum $31$, product $630$ $k=4$.
    $endgroup$
    – hexomino
    May 27 at 12:04














  • 1




    $begingroup$
    I think there is an additional restriction in that once you know $X$, you can determine $Y$ because Beth knows exactly the product at the end. This means that there is an $(X,Y,k)$ with at least two solutions and any other such triplet including $X$ has the same value for $Y$. Also we must have the $k >2$, otherwise Beth could determine the turtle values exactly from knowing $Y$ and $k$.
    $endgroup$
    – hexomino
    May 27 at 11:44










  • $begingroup$
    @hexomino ah, clever! I should try to fix this..
    $endgroup$
    – athin
    May 27 at 11:48










  • $begingroup$
    @hexomino wait no, even if you know $X$, $Y$ still couldn't be determined as indicated by first spoiler..
    $endgroup$
    – athin
    May 27 at 11:52










  • $begingroup$
    so Beth's first question is essentially "If you tell me $Y$ and $k$ can I determine the ages?" If $k<3$, then Ana would say "yes" because it's a determined system.
    $endgroup$
    – hexomino
    May 27 at 11:56






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    As to my first point, take your solution $(X,Y,k) = (31, 720, 3)$. For this to work, you have to know that there is no other solution $(31, Y, k)$ which has two different sums with $Y neq 720$, otherwise Beth cannot determine $Y$. In this instance, there is another solution $(1,5,7,18)$ and $(2,3,5,21)$ which has sum $31$, product $630$ $k=4$.
    $endgroup$
    – hexomino
    May 27 at 12:04








1




1




$begingroup$
I think there is an additional restriction in that once you know $X$, you can determine $Y$ because Beth knows exactly the product at the end. This means that there is an $(X,Y,k)$ with at least two solutions and any other such triplet including $X$ has the same value for $Y$. Also we must have the $k >2$, otherwise Beth could determine the turtle values exactly from knowing $Y$ and $k$.
$endgroup$
– hexomino
May 27 at 11:44




$begingroup$
I think there is an additional restriction in that once you know $X$, you can determine $Y$ because Beth knows exactly the product at the end. This means that there is an $(X,Y,k)$ with at least two solutions and any other such triplet including $X$ has the same value for $Y$. Also we must have the $k >2$, otherwise Beth could determine the turtle values exactly from knowing $Y$ and $k$.
$endgroup$
– hexomino
May 27 at 11:44












$begingroup$
@hexomino ah, clever! I should try to fix this..
$endgroup$
– athin
May 27 at 11:48




$begingroup$
@hexomino ah, clever! I should try to fix this..
$endgroup$
– athin
May 27 at 11:48












$begingroup$
@hexomino wait no, even if you know $X$, $Y$ still couldn't be determined as indicated by first spoiler..
$endgroup$
– athin
May 27 at 11:52




$begingroup$
@hexomino wait no, even if you know $X$, $Y$ still couldn't be determined as indicated by first spoiler..
$endgroup$
– athin
May 27 at 11:52












$begingroup$
so Beth's first question is essentially "If you tell me $Y$ and $k$ can I determine the ages?" If $k<3$, then Ana would say "yes" because it's a determined system.
$endgroup$
– hexomino
May 27 at 11:56




$begingroup$
so Beth's first question is essentially "If you tell me $Y$ and $k$ can I determine the ages?" If $k<3$, then Ana would say "yes" because it's a determined system.
$endgroup$
– hexomino
May 27 at 11:56




1




1




$begingroup$
As to my first point, take your solution $(X,Y,k) = (31, 720, 3)$. For this to work, you have to know that there is no other solution $(31, Y, k)$ which has two different sums with $Y neq 720$, otherwise Beth cannot determine $Y$. In this instance, there is another solution $(1,5,7,18)$ and $(2,3,5,21)$ which has sum $31$, product $630$ $k=4$.
$endgroup$
– hexomino
May 27 at 12:04




$begingroup$
As to my first point, take your solution $(X,Y,k) = (31, 720, 3)$. For this to work, you have to know that there is no other solution $(31, Y, k)$ which has two different sums with $Y neq 720$, otherwise Beth cannot determine $Y$. In this instance, there is another solution $(1,5,7,18)$ and $(2,3,5,21)$ which has sum $31$, product $630$ $k=4$.
$endgroup$
– hexomino
May 27 at 12:04



















draft saved

draft discarded



















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Puzzling Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fpuzzling.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f84401%2fa-mathematical-discussion-fill-in-the-blank%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Færeyskur hestur Heimild | Tengill | Tilvísanir | LeiðsagnarvalRossið - síða um færeyska hrossið á færeyskuGott ár hjá færeyska hestinum

He _____ here since 1970 . Answer needed [closed]What does “since he was so high” mean?Meaning of “catch birds for”?How do I ensure “since” takes the meaning I want?“Who cares here” meaningWhat does “right round toward” mean?the time tense (had now been detected)What does the phrase “ring around the roses” mean here?Correct usage of “visited upon”Meaning of “foiled rail sabotage bid”It was the third time I had gone to Rome or It is the third time I had been to Rome

Slayer Innehåll Historia | Stil, komposition och lyrik | Bandets betydelse och framgångar | Sidoprojekt och samarbeten | Kontroverser | Medlemmar | Utmärkelser och nomineringar | Turnéer och festivaler | Diskografi | Referenser | Externa länkar | Navigeringsmenywww.slayer.net”Metal Massacre vol. 1””Metal Massacre vol. 3””Metal Massacre Volume III””Show No Mercy””Haunting the Chapel””Live Undead””Hell Awaits””Reign in Blood””Reign in Blood””Gold & Platinum – Reign in Blood””Golden Gods Awards Winners”originalet”Kerrang! Hall Of Fame””Slayer Looks Back On 37-Year Career In New Video Series: Part Two””South of Heaven””Gold & Platinum – South of Heaven””Seasons in the Abyss””Gold & Platinum - Seasons in the Abyss””Divine Intervention””Divine Intervention - Release group by Slayer””Gold & Platinum - Divine Intervention””Live Intrusion””Undisputed Attitude””Abolish Government/Superficial Love””Release “Slatanic Slaughter: A Tribute to Slayer” by Various Artists””Diabolus in Musica””Soundtrack to the Apocalypse””God Hates Us All””Systematic - Relationships””War at the Warfield””Gold & Platinum - War at the Warfield””Soundtrack to the Apocalypse””Gold & Platinum - Still Reigning””Metallica, Slayer, Iron Mauden Among Winners At Metal Hammer Awards””Eternal Pyre””Eternal Pyre - Slayer release group””Eternal Pyre””Metal Storm Awards 2006””Kerrang! Hall Of Fame””Slayer Wins 'Best Metal' Grammy Award””Slayer Guitarist Jeff Hanneman Dies””Bullet-For My Valentine booed at Metal Hammer Golden Gods Awards””Unholy Aliance””The End Of Slayer?””Slayer: We Could Thrash Out Two More Albums If We're Fast Enough...””'The Unholy Alliance: Chapter III' UK Dates Added”originalet”Megadeth And Slayer To Co-Headline 'Canadian Carnage' Trek”originalet”World Painted Blood””Release “World Painted Blood” by Slayer””Metallica Heading To Cinemas””Slayer, Megadeth To Join Forces For 'European Carnage' Tour - Dec. 18, 2010”originalet”Slayer's Hanneman Contracts Acute Infection; Band To Bring In Guest Guitarist””Cannibal Corpse's Pat O'Brien Will Step In As Slayer's Guest Guitarist”originalet”Slayer’s Jeff Hanneman Dead at 49””Dave Lombardo Says He Made Only $67,000 In 2011 While Touring With Slayer””Slayer: We Do Not Agree With Dave Lombardo's Substance Or Timeline Of Events””Slayer Welcomes Drummer Paul Bostaph Back To The Fold””Slayer Hope to Unveil Never-Before-Heard Jeff Hanneman Material on Next Album””Slayer Debut New Song 'Implode' During Surprise Golden Gods Appearance””Release group Repentless by Slayer””Repentless - Slayer - Credits””Slayer””Metal Storm Awards 2015””Slayer - to release comic book "Repentless #1"””Slayer To Release 'Repentless' 6.66" Vinyl Box Set””BREAKING NEWS: Slayer Announce Farewell Tour””Slayer Recruit Lamb of God, Anthrax, Behemoth + Testament for Final Tour””Slayer lägger ner efter 37 år””Slayer Announces Second North American Leg Of 'Final' Tour””Final World Tour””Slayer Announces Final European Tour With Lamb of God, Anthrax And Obituary””Slayer To Tour Europe With Lamb of God, Anthrax And Obituary””Slayer To Play 'Last French Show Ever' At Next Year's Hellfst””Slayer's Final World Tour Will Extend Into 2019””Death Angel's Rob Cavestany On Slayer's 'Farewell' Tour: 'Some Of Us Could See This Coming'””Testament Has No Plans To Retire Anytime Soon, Says Chuck Billy””Anthrax's Scott Ian On Slayer's 'Farewell' Tour Plans: 'I Was Surprised And I Wasn't Surprised'””Slayer””Slayer's Morbid Schlock””Review/Rock; For Slayer, the Mania Is the Message””Slayer - Biography””Slayer - Reign In Blood”originalet”Dave Lombardo””An exclusive oral history of Slayer”originalet”Exclusive! Interview With Slayer Guitarist Jeff Hanneman”originalet”Thinking Out Loud: Slayer's Kerry King on hair metal, Satan and being polite””Slayer Lyrics””Slayer - Biography””Most influential artists for extreme metal music””Slayer - Reign in Blood””Slayer guitarist Jeff Hanneman dies aged 49””Slatanic Slaughter: A Tribute to Slayer””Gateway to Hell: A Tribute to Slayer””Covered In Blood””Slayer: The Origins of Thrash in San Francisco, CA.””Why They Rule - #6 Slayer”originalet”Guitar World's 100 Greatest Heavy Metal Guitarists Of All Time”originalet”The fans have spoken: Slayer comes out on top in readers' polls”originalet”Tribute to Jeff Hanneman (1964-2013)””Lamb Of God Frontman: We Sound Like A Slayer Rip-Off””BEHEMOTH Frontman Pays Tribute To SLAYER's JEFF HANNEMAN””Slayer, Hatebreed Doing Double Duty On This Year's Ozzfest””System of a Down””Lacuna Coil’s Andrea Ferro Talks Influences, Skateboarding, Band Origins + More””Slayer - Reign in Blood””Into The Lungs of Hell””Slayer rules - en utställning om fans””Slayer and Their Fans Slashed Through a No-Holds-Barred Night at Gas Monkey””Home””Slayer””Gold & Platinum - The Big 4 Live from Sofia, Bulgaria””Exclusive! Interview With Slayer Guitarist Kerry King””2008-02-23: Wiltern, Los Angeles, CA, USA””Slayer's Kerry King To Perform With Megadeth Tonight! - Oct. 21, 2010”originalet”Dave Lombardo - Biography”Slayer Case DismissedArkiveradUltimate Classic Rock: Slayer guitarist Jeff Hanneman dead at 49.”Slayer: "We could never do any thing like Some Kind Of Monster..."””Cannibal Corpse'S Pat O'Brien Will Step In As Slayer'S Guest Guitarist | The Official Slayer Site”originalet”Slayer Wins 'Best Metal' Grammy Award””Slayer Guitarist Jeff Hanneman Dies””Kerrang! Awards 2006 Blog: Kerrang! Hall Of Fame””Kerrang! Awards 2013: Kerrang! Legend”originalet”Metallica, Slayer, Iron Maien Among Winners At Metal Hammer Awards””Metal Hammer Golden Gods Awards””Bullet For My Valentine Booed At Metal Hammer Golden Gods Awards””Metal Storm Awards 2006””Metal Storm Awards 2015””Slayer's Concert History””Slayer - Relationships””Slayer - Releases”Slayers officiella webbplatsSlayer på MusicBrainzOfficiell webbplatsSlayerSlayerr1373445760000 0001 1540 47353068615-5086262726cb13906545x(data)6033143kn20030215029