Could you calculate the variance of data using the median or something other than the mean?
$begingroup$
Could we calculate the variance without using the mean as the 'base' point?
mathematical-statistics variance mean median scale-estimator
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Could we calculate the variance without using the mean as the 'base' point?
mathematical-statistics variance mean median scale-estimator
$endgroup$
3
$begingroup$
Given $mathbb{E}(X^2)<infty$, the variance is given by $sigma^2 = mathbb{E}((X-mathbb{E}(X))^2)$ by definition. The formular simplifies to $sigma^2 =mathbb{E}(X^2) - mathbb{E}(X)^2$. I.e., for the variance you need $mathbb{E}(X)$. Of course you could define your own dispersion measure using some other statistic...or use one from the answers.
$endgroup$
– BloXX
18 hours ago
5
$begingroup$
Short answer: Lots of other ways to summarize variability (dispersion, spread, scale) but none of the others would be the variance. (In fact, the variance can be defined without reference to the mean.)
$endgroup$
– Nick Cox
17 hours ago
3
$begingroup$
Yes: given data $X,$ compute the covariance of $(X,X)$ as described at stats.stackexchange.com/a/18200/919. This method never computes the mean.
$endgroup$
– whuber♦
12 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Could we calculate the variance without using the mean as the 'base' point?
mathematical-statistics variance mean median scale-estimator
$endgroup$
Could we calculate the variance without using the mean as the 'base' point?
mathematical-statistics variance mean median scale-estimator
mathematical-statistics variance mean median scale-estimator
edited 9 hours ago
Ferdi
3,86742355
3,86742355
asked 18 hours ago
WillWill
411
411
3
$begingroup$
Given $mathbb{E}(X^2)<infty$, the variance is given by $sigma^2 = mathbb{E}((X-mathbb{E}(X))^2)$ by definition. The formular simplifies to $sigma^2 =mathbb{E}(X^2) - mathbb{E}(X)^2$. I.e., for the variance you need $mathbb{E}(X)$. Of course you could define your own dispersion measure using some other statistic...or use one from the answers.
$endgroup$
– BloXX
18 hours ago
5
$begingroup$
Short answer: Lots of other ways to summarize variability (dispersion, spread, scale) but none of the others would be the variance. (In fact, the variance can be defined without reference to the mean.)
$endgroup$
– Nick Cox
17 hours ago
3
$begingroup$
Yes: given data $X,$ compute the covariance of $(X,X)$ as described at stats.stackexchange.com/a/18200/919. This method never computes the mean.
$endgroup$
– whuber♦
12 hours ago
add a comment |
3
$begingroup$
Given $mathbb{E}(X^2)<infty$, the variance is given by $sigma^2 = mathbb{E}((X-mathbb{E}(X))^2)$ by definition. The formular simplifies to $sigma^2 =mathbb{E}(X^2) - mathbb{E}(X)^2$. I.e., for the variance you need $mathbb{E}(X)$. Of course you could define your own dispersion measure using some other statistic...or use one from the answers.
$endgroup$
– BloXX
18 hours ago
5
$begingroup$
Short answer: Lots of other ways to summarize variability (dispersion, spread, scale) but none of the others would be the variance. (In fact, the variance can be defined without reference to the mean.)
$endgroup$
– Nick Cox
17 hours ago
3
$begingroup$
Yes: given data $X,$ compute the covariance of $(X,X)$ as described at stats.stackexchange.com/a/18200/919. This method never computes the mean.
$endgroup$
– whuber♦
12 hours ago
3
3
$begingroup$
Given $mathbb{E}(X^2)<infty$, the variance is given by $sigma^2 = mathbb{E}((X-mathbb{E}(X))^2)$ by definition. The formular simplifies to $sigma^2 =mathbb{E}(X^2) - mathbb{E}(X)^2$. I.e., for the variance you need $mathbb{E}(X)$. Of course you could define your own dispersion measure using some other statistic...or use one from the answers.
$endgroup$
– BloXX
18 hours ago
$begingroup$
Given $mathbb{E}(X^2)<infty$, the variance is given by $sigma^2 = mathbb{E}((X-mathbb{E}(X))^2)$ by definition. The formular simplifies to $sigma^2 =mathbb{E}(X^2) - mathbb{E}(X)^2$. I.e., for the variance you need $mathbb{E}(X)$. Of course you could define your own dispersion measure using some other statistic...or use one from the answers.
$endgroup$
– BloXX
18 hours ago
5
5
$begingroup$
Short answer: Lots of other ways to summarize variability (dispersion, spread, scale) but none of the others would be the variance. (In fact, the variance can be defined without reference to the mean.)
$endgroup$
– Nick Cox
17 hours ago
$begingroup$
Short answer: Lots of other ways to summarize variability (dispersion, spread, scale) but none of the others would be the variance. (In fact, the variance can be defined without reference to the mean.)
$endgroup$
– Nick Cox
17 hours ago
3
3
$begingroup$
Yes: given data $X,$ compute the covariance of $(X,X)$ as described at stats.stackexchange.com/a/18200/919. This method never computes the mean.
$endgroup$
– whuber♦
12 hours ago
$begingroup$
Yes: given data $X,$ compute the covariance of $(X,X)$ as described at stats.stackexchange.com/a/18200/919. This method never computes the mean.
$endgroup$
– whuber♦
12 hours ago
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
The median absolute deviation is defined as
$$text{MAD}(X) = text{median} |X-text{median}(X)|$$
and is considered an alternative to the standard deviation. But this is not the variance. In particular, it always exists, whether or not $X$ allows for moments. For instance, the MAD of a standard Cauchy is equal to one since
$$underbrace{Bbb P(|X-0|<1)}_text{0 is the median}=arctan(1)/pi-arctan(-1)/pi=frac{1}{2}$$
$endgroup$
7
$begingroup$
Newcomers to this idea should watch out also for mean absolute deviation from the mean (mean deviation, often) and median absolute deviation from the mean. I don't recall mean absolute deviation from the median, but am open to examples. The abbreviation MAD, unfortunately, has been applied variously, so trust people's code first, then their algebraic or verbal definition, but use of an abbreviation MAD only not at all. In symmetric distributions, and some others, MAD as defined here is half the interquartile range. (Punning on MAD I resist as a little too obvious.)
$endgroup$
– Nick Cox
17 hours ago
3
$begingroup$
Also, note that software implementations of the median absolute deviation function can scale the MAD value by a constant factor from the form presented in this answer, so that its value coincides with the standard deviation for a normal distribution.
$endgroup$
– EdM
17 hours ago
$begingroup$
@EdM Excellent point. Personally I dislike that practice unless people use some different term. It's no longer the MAD!
$endgroup$
– Nick Cox
17 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
@NickCox: the appeal of centring on the median is that the quantity always exists, whether or not the distribution enjoys a mean. This is the definition found in Wikipedia.
$endgroup$
– Xi'an
16 hours ago
$begingroup$
MAD is Mutually Assured Destruction
$endgroup$
– kjetil b halvorsen
15 hours ago
|
show 2 more comments
$begingroup$
There is already a solution for this question on Math.stackexchange:
I summarize the answers:
- You can use that the variance is $overline{x^2} - overline {x}^2$, which takes only one pass (computing the mean and the mean of the squares simultaneously), but can be more prone to roundoff error if the variance is small compared with the mean.
- How about sum of squared pairwise differences ? Indeed, you can check by direct computation that
$$
2v_X = frac{1}{n(n-1)}sum_{1 le i < j le n}(x_i - x_j)^2.
$$
- The sample variance without mean is calculated as:
$$ v_{X}=frac{1}{n-1}left [ sum_{i=1}^{n}x_{i}^{2}-frac{1}{n}left ( sum_{i=1}^{n}x_{i} right ) ^{2}right ] $$
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "65"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstats.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f399445%2fcould-you-calculate-the-variance-of-data-using-the-median-or-something-other-tha%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
The median absolute deviation is defined as
$$text{MAD}(X) = text{median} |X-text{median}(X)|$$
and is considered an alternative to the standard deviation. But this is not the variance. In particular, it always exists, whether or not $X$ allows for moments. For instance, the MAD of a standard Cauchy is equal to one since
$$underbrace{Bbb P(|X-0|<1)}_text{0 is the median}=arctan(1)/pi-arctan(-1)/pi=frac{1}{2}$$
$endgroup$
7
$begingroup$
Newcomers to this idea should watch out also for mean absolute deviation from the mean (mean deviation, often) and median absolute deviation from the mean. I don't recall mean absolute deviation from the median, but am open to examples. The abbreviation MAD, unfortunately, has been applied variously, so trust people's code first, then their algebraic or verbal definition, but use of an abbreviation MAD only not at all. In symmetric distributions, and some others, MAD as defined here is half the interquartile range. (Punning on MAD I resist as a little too obvious.)
$endgroup$
– Nick Cox
17 hours ago
3
$begingroup$
Also, note that software implementations of the median absolute deviation function can scale the MAD value by a constant factor from the form presented in this answer, so that its value coincides with the standard deviation for a normal distribution.
$endgroup$
– EdM
17 hours ago
$begingroup$
@EdM Excellent point. Personally I dislike that practice unless people use some different term. It's no longer the MAD!
$endgroup$
– Nick Cox
17 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
@NickCox: the appeal of centring on the median is that the quantity always exists, whether or not the distribution enjoys a mean. This is the definition found in Wikipedia.
$endgroup$
– Xi'an
16 hours ago
$begingroup$
MAD is Mutually Assured Destruction
$endgroup$
– kjetil b halvorsen
15 hours ago
|
show 2 more comments
$begingroup$
The median absolute deviation is defined as
$$text{MAD}(X) = text{median} |X-text{median}(X)|$$
and is considered an alternative to the standard deviation. But this is not the variance. In particular, it always exists, whether or not $X$ allows for moments. For instance, the MAD of a standard Cauchy is equal to one since
$$underbrace{Bbb P(|X-0|<1)}_text{0 is the median}=arctan(1)/pi-arctan(-1)/pi=frac{1}{2}$$
$endgroup$
7
$begingroup$
Newcomers to this idea should watch out also for mean absolute deviation from the mean (mean deviation, often) and median absolute deviation from the mean. I don't recall mean absolute deviation from the median, but am open to examples. The abbreviation MAD, unfortunately, has been applied variously, so trust people's code first, then their algebraic or verbal definition, but use of an abbreviation MAD only not at all. In symmetric distributions, and some others, MAD as defined here is half the interquartile range. (Punning on MAD I resist as a little too obvious.)
$endgroup$
– Nick Cox
17 hours ago
3
$begingroup$
Also, note that software implementations of the median absolute deviation function can scale the MAD value by a constant factor from the form presented in this answer, so that its value coincides with the standard deviation for a normal distribution.
$endgroup$
– EdM
17 hours ago
$begingroup$
@EdM Excellent point. Personally I dislike that practice unless people use some different term. It's no longer the MAD!
$endgroup$
– Nick Cox
17 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
@NickCox: the appeal of centring on the median is that the quantity always exists, whether or not the distribution enjoys a mean. This is the definition found in Wikipedia.
$endgroup$
– Xi'an
16 hours ago
$begingroup$
MAD is Mutually Assured Destruction
$endgroup$
– kjetil b halvorsen
15 hours ago
|
show 2 more comments
$begingroup$
The median absolute deviation is defined as
$$text{MAD}(X) = text{median} |X-text{median}(X)|$$
and is considered an alternative to the standard deviation. But this is not the variance. In particular, it always exists, whether or not $X$ allows for moments. For instance, the MAD of a standard Cauchy is equal to one since
$$underbrace{Bbb P(|X-0|<1)}_text{0 is the median}=arctan(1)/pi-arctan(-1)/pi=frac{1}{2}$$
$endgroup$
The median absolute deviation is defined as
$$text{MAD}(X) = text{median} |X-text{median}(X)|$$
and is considered an alternative to the standard deviation. But this is not the variance. In particular, it always exists, whether or not $X$ allows for moments. For instance, the MAD of a standard Cauchy is equal to one since
$$underbrace{Bbb P(|X-0|<1)}_text{0 is the median}=arctan(1)/pi-arctan(-1)/pi=frac{1}{2}$$
edited 13 hours ago
ukemi
1053
1053
answered 17 hours ago
Xi'anXi'an
58.9k897364
58.9k897364
7
$begingroup$
Newcomers to this idea should watch out also for mean absolute deviation from the mean (mean deviation, often) and median absolute deviation from the mean. I don't recall mean absolute deviation from the median, but am open to examples. The abbreviation MAD, unfortunately, has been applied variously, so trust people's code first, then their algebraic or verbal definition, but use of an abbreviation MAD only not at all. In symmetric distributions, and some others, MAD as defined here is half the interquartile range. (Punning on MAD I resist as a little too obvious.)
$endgroup$
– Nick Cox
17 hours ago
3
$begingroup$
Also, note that software implementations of the median absolute deviation function can scale the MAD value by a constant factor from the form presented in this answer, so that its value coincides with the standard deviation for a normal distribution.
$endgroup$
– EdM
17 hours ago
$begingroup$
@EdM Excellent point. Personally I dislike that practice unless people use some different term. It's no longer the MAD!
$endgroup$
– Nick Cox
17 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
@NickCox: the appeal of centring on the median is that the quantity always exists, whether or not the distribution enjoys a mean. This is the definition found in Wikipedia.
$endgroup$
– Xi'an
16 hours ago
$begingroup$
MAD is Mutually Assured Destruction
$endgroup$
– kjetil b halvorsen
15 hours ago
|
show 2 more comments
7
$begingroup$
Newcomers to this idea should watch out also for mean absolute deviation from the mean (mean deviation, often) and median absolute deviation from the mean. I don't recall mean absolute deviation from the median, but am open to examples. The abbreviation MAD, unfortunately, has been applied variously, so trust people's code first, then their algebraic or verbal definition, but use of an abbreviation MAD only not at all. In symmetric distributions, and some others, MAD as defined here is half the interquartile range. (Punning on MAD I resist as a little too obvious.)
$endgroup$
– Nick Cox
17 hours ago
3
$begingroup$
Also, note that software implementations of the median absolute deviation function can scale the MAD value by a constant factor from the form presented in this answer, so that its value coincides with the standard deviation for a normal distribution.
$endgroup$
– EdM
17 hours ago
$begingroup$
@EdM Excellent point. Personally I dislike that practice unless people use some different term. It's no longer the MAD!
$endgroup$
– Nick Cox
17 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
@NickCox: the appeal of centring on the median is that the quantity always exists, whether or not the distribution enjoys a mean. This is the definition found in Wikipedia.
$endgroup$
– Xi'an
16 hours ago
$begingroup$
MAD is Mutually Assured Destruction
$endgroup$
– kjetil b halvorsen
15 hours ago
7
7
$begingroup$
Newcomers to this idea should watch out also for mean absolute deviation from the mean (mean deviation, often) and median absolute deviation from the mean. I don't recall mean absolute deviation from the median, but am open to examples. The abbreviation MAD, unfortunately, has been applied variously, so trust people's code first, then their algebraic or verbal definition, but use of an abbreviation MAD only not at all. In symmetric distributions, and some others, MAD as defined here is half the interquartile range. (Punning on MAD I resist as a little too obvious.)
$endgroup$
– Nick Cox
17 hours ago
$begingroup$
Newcomers to this idea should watch out also for mean absolute deviation from the mean (mean deviation, often) and median absolute deviation from the mean. I don't recall mean absolute deviation from the median, but am open to examples. The abbreviation MAD, unfortunately, has been applied variously, so trust people's code first, then their algebraic or verbal definition, but use of an abbreviation MAD only not at all. In symmetric distributions, and some others, MAD as defined here is half the interquartile range. (Punning on MAD I resist as a little too obvious.)
$endgroup$
– Nick Cox
17 hours ago
3
3
$begingroup$
Also, note that software implementations of the median absolute deviation function can scale the MAD value by a constant factor from the form presented in this answer, so that its value coincides with the standard deviation for a normal distribution.
$endgroup$
– EdM
17 hours ago
$begingroup$
Also, note that software implementations of the median absolute deviation function can scale the MAD value by a constant factor from the form presented in this answer, so that its value coincides with the standard deviation for a normal distribution.
$endgroup$
– EdM
17 hours ago
$begingroup$
@EdM Excellent point. Personally I dislike that practice unless people use some different term. It's no longer the MAD!
$endgroup$
– Nick Cox
17 hours ago
$begingroup$
@EdM Excellent point. Personally I dislike that practice unless people use some different term. It's no longer the MAD!
$endgroup$
– Nick Cox
17 hours ago
1
1
$begingroup$
@NickCox: the appeal of centring on the median is that the quantity always exists, whether or not the distribution enjoys a mean. This is the definition found in Wikipedia.
$endgroup$
– Xi'an
16 hours ago
$begingroup$
@NickCox: the appeal of centring on the median is that the quantity always exists, whether or not the distribution enjoys a mean. This is the definition found in Wikipedia.
$endgroup$
– Xi'an
16 hours ago
$begingroup$
MAD is Mutually Assured Destruction
$endgroup$
– kjetil b halvorsen
15 hours ago
$begingroup$
MAD is Mutually Assured Destruction
$endgroup$
– kjetil b halvorsen
15 hours ago
|
show 2 more comments
$begingroup$
There is already a solution for this question on Math.stackexchange:
I summarize the answers:
- You can use that the variance is $overline{x^2} - overline {x}^2$, which takes only one pass (computing the mean and the mean of the squares simultaneously), but can be more prone to roundoff error if the variance is small compared with the mean.
- How about sum of squared pairwise differences ? Indeed, you can check by direct computation that
$$
2v_X = frac{1}{n(n-1)}sum_{1 le i < j le n}(x_i - x_j)^2.
$$
- The sample variance without mean is calculated as:
$$ v_{X}=frac{1}{n-1}left [ sum_{i=1}^{n}x_{i}^{2}-frac{1}{n}left ( sum_{i=1}^{n}x_{i} right ) ^{2}right ] $$
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
There is already a solution for this question on Math.stackexchange:
I summarize the answers:
- You can use that the variance is $overline{x^2} - overline {x}^2$, which takes only one pass (computing the mean and the mean of the squares simultaneously), but can be more prone to roundoff error if the variance is small compared with the mean.
- How about sum of squared pairwise differences ? Indeed, you can check by direct computation that
$$
2v_X = frac{1}{n(n-1)}sum_{1 le i < j le n}(x_i - x_j)^2.
$$
- The sample variance without mean is calculated as:
$$ v_{X}=frac{1}{n-1}left [ sum_{i=1}^{n}x_{i}^{2}-frac{1}{n}left ( sum_{i=1}^{n}x_{i} right ) ^{2}right ] $$
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
There is already a solution for this question on Math.stackexchange:
I summarize the answers:
- You can use that the variance is $overline{x^2} - overline {x}^2$, which takes only one pass (computing the mean and the mean of the squares simultaneously), but can be more prone to roundoff error if the variance is small compared with the mean.
- How about sum of squared pairwise differences ? Indeed, you can check by direct computation that
$$
2v_X = frac{1}{n(n-1)}sum_{1 le i < j le n}(x_i - x_j)^2.
$$
- The sample variance without mean is calculated as:
$$ v_{X}=frac{1}{n-1}left [ sum_{i=1}^{n}x_{i}^{2}-frac{1}{n}left ( sum_{i=1}^{n}x_{i} right ) ^{2}right ] $$
$endgroup$
There is already a solution for this question on Math.stackexchange:
I summarize the answers:
- You can use that the variance is $overline{x^2} - overline {x}^2$, which takes only one pass (computing the mean and the mean of the squares simultaneously), but can be more prone to roundoff error if the variance is small compared with the mean.
- How about sum of squared pairwise differences ? Indeed, you can check by direct computation that
$$
2v_X = frac{1}{n(n-1)}sum_{1 le i < j le n}(x_i - x_j)^2.
$$
- The sample variance without mean is calculated as:
$$ v_{X}=frac{1}{n-1}left [ sum_{i=1}^{n}x_{i}^{2}-frac{1}{n}left ( sum_{i=1}^{n}x_{i} right ) ^{2}right ] $$
edited 8 hours ago
answered 9 hours ago
FerdiFerdi
3,86742355
3,86742355
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Cross Validated!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstats.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f399445%2fcould-you-calculate-the-variance-of-data-using-the-median-or-something-other-tha%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
3
$begingroup$
Given $mathbb{E}(X^2)<infty$, the variance is given by $sigma^2 = mathbb{E}((X-mathbb{E}(X))^2)$ by definition. The formular simplifies to $sigma^2 =mathbb{E}(X^2) - mathbb{E}(X)^2$. I.e., for the variance you need $mathbb{E}(X)$. Of course you could define your own dispersion measure using some other statistic...or use one from the answers.
$endgroup$
– BloXX
18 hours ago
5
$begingroup$
Short answer: Lots of other ways to summarize variability (dispersion, spread, scale) but none of the others would be the variance. (In fact, the variance can be defined without reference to the mean.)
$endgroup$
– Nick Cox
17 hours ago
3
$begingroup$
Yes: given data $X,$ compute the covariance of $(X,X)$ as described at stats.stackexchange.com/a/18200/919. This method never computes the mean.
$endgroup$
– whuber♦
12 hours ago