Could you calculate the variance of data using the median or something other than the mean?












7












$begingroup$


Could we calculate the variance without using the mean as the 'base' point?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$








  • 3




    $begingroup$
    Given $mathbb{E}(X^2)<infty$, the variance is given by $sigma^2 = mathbb{E}((X-mathbb{E}(X))^2)$ by definition. The formular simplifies to $sigma^2 =mathbb{E}(X^2) - mathbb{E}(X)^2$. I.e., for the variance you need $mathbb{E}(X)$. Of course you could define your own dispersion measure using some other statistic...or use one from the answers.
    $endgroup$
    – BloXX
    18 hours ago








  • 5




    $begingroup$
    Short answer: Lots of other ways to summarize variability (dispersion, spread, scale) but none of the others would be the variance. (In fact, the variance can be defined without reference to the mean.)
    $endgroup$
    – Nick Cox
    17 hours ago






  • 3




    $begingroup$
    Yes: given data $X,$ compute the covariance of $(X,X)$ as described at stats.stackexchange.com/a/18200/919. This method never computes the mean.
    $endgroup$
    – whuber
    12 hours ago
















7












$begingroup$


Could we calculate the variance without using the mean as the 'base' point?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$








  • 3




    $begingroup$
    Given $mathbb{E}(X^2)<infty$, the variance is given by $sigma^2 = mathbb{E}((X-mathbb{E}(X))^2)$ by definition. The formular simplifies to $sigma^2 =mathbb{E}(X^2) - mathbb{E}(X)^2$. I.e., for the variance you need $mathbb{E}(X)$. Of course you could define your own dispersion measure using some other statistic...or use one from the answers.
    $endgroup$
    – BloXX
    18 hours ago








  • 5




    $begingroup$
    Short answer: Lots of other ways to summarize variability (dispersion, spread, scale) but none of the others would be the variance. (In fact, the variance can be defined without reference to the mean.)
    $endgroup$
    – Nick Cox
    17 hours ago






  • 3




    $begingroup$
    Yes: given data $X,$ compute the covariance of $(X,X)$ as described at stats.stackexchange.com/a/18200/919. This method never computes the mean.
    $endgroup$
    – whuber
    12 hours ago














7












7








7


1



$begingroup$


Could we calculate the variance without using the mean as the 'base' point?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$




Could we calculate the variance without using the mean as the 'base' point?







mathematical-statistics variance mean median scale-estimator






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited 9 hours ago









Ferdi

3,86742355




3,86742355










asked 18 hours ago









WillWill

411




411








  • 3




    $begingroup$
    Given $mathbb{E}(X^2)<infty$, the variance is given by $sigma^2 = mathbb{E}((X-mathbb{E}(X))^2)$ by definition. The formular simplifies to $sigma^2 =mathbb{E}(X^2) - mathbb{E}(X)^2$. I.e., for the variance you need $mathbb{E}(X)$. Of course you could define your own dispersion measure using some other statistic...or use one from the answers.
    $endgroup$
    – BloXX
    18 hours ago








  • 5




    $begingroup$
    Short answer: Lots of other ways to summarize variability (dispersion, spread, scale) but none of the others would be the variance. (In fact, the variance can be defined without reference to the mean.)
    $endgroup$
    – Nick Cox
    17 hours ago






  • 3




    $begingroup$
    Yes: given data $X,$ compute the covariance of $(X,X)$ as described at stats.stackexchange.com/a/18200/919. This method never computes the mean.
    $endgroup$
    – whuber
    12 hours ago














  • 3




    $begingroup$
    Given $mathbb{E}(X^2)<infty$, the variance is given by $sigma^2 = mathbb{E}((X-mathbb{E}(X))^2)$ by definition. The formular simplifies to $sigma^2 =mathbb{E}(X^2) - mathbb{E}(X)^2$. I.e., for the variance you need $mathbb{E}(X)$. Of course you could define your own dispersion measure using some other statistic...or use one from the answers.
    $endgroup$
    – BloXX
    18 hours ago








  • 5




    $begingroup$
    Short answer: Lots of other ways to summarize variability (dispersion, spread, scale) but none of the others would be the variance. (In fact, the variance can be defined without reference to the mean.)
    $endgroup$
    – Nick Cox
    17 hours ago






  • 3




    $begingroup$
    Yes: given data $X,$ compute the covariance of $(X,X)$ as described at stats.stackexchange.com/a/18200/919. This method never computes the mean.
    $endgroup$
    – whuber
    12 hours ago








3




3




$begingroup$
Given $mathbb{E}(X^2)<infty$, the variance is given by $sigma^2 = mathbb{E}((X-mathbb{E}(X))^2)$ by definition. The formular simplifies to $sigma^2 =mathbb{E}(X^2) - mathbb{E}(X)^2$. I.e., for the variance you need $mathbb{E}(X)$. Of course you could define your own dispersion measure using some other statistic...or use one from the answers.
$endgroup$
– BloXX
18 hours ago






$begingroup$
Given $mathbb{E}(X^2)<infty$, the variance is given by $sigma^2 = mathbb{E}((X-mathbb{E}(X))^2)$ by definition. The formular simplifies to $sigma^2 =mathbb{E}(X^2) - mathbb{E}(X)^2$. I.e., for the variance you need $mathbb{E}(X)$. Of course you could define your own dispersion measure using some other statistic...or use one from the answers.
$endgroup$
– BloXX
18 hours ago






5




5




$begingroup$
Short answer: Lots of other ways to summarize variability (dispersion, spread, scale) but none of the others would be the variance. (In fact, the variance can be defined without reference to the mean.)
$endgroup$
– Nick Cox
17 hours ago




$begingroup$
Short answer: Lots of other ways to summarize variability (dispersion, spread, scale) but none of the others would be the variance. (In fact, the variance can be defined without reference to the mean.)
$endgroup$
– Nick Cox
17 hours ago




3




3




$begingroup$
Yes: given data $X,$ compute the covariance of $(X,X)$ as described at stats.stackexchange.com/a/18200/919. This method never computes the mean.
$endgroup$
– whuber
12 hours ago




$begingroup$
Yes: given data $X,$ compute the covariance of $(X,X)$ as described at stats.stackexchange.com/a/18200/919. This method never computes the mean.
$endgroup$
– whuber
12 hours ago










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















11












$begingroup$

The median absolute deviation is defined as
$$text{MAD}(X) = text{median} |X-text{median}(X)|$$
and is considered an alternative to the standard deviation. But this is not the variance. In particular, it always exists, whether or not $X$ allows for moments. For instance, the MAD of a standard Cauchy is equal to one since
$$underbrace{Bbb P(|X-0|<1)}_text{0 is the median}=arctan(1)/pi-arctan(-1)/pi=frac{1}{2}$$






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$









  • 7




    $begingroup$
    Newcomers to this idea should watch out also for mean absolute deviation from the mean (mean deviation, often) and median absolute deviation from the mean. I don't recall mean absolute deviation from the median, but am open to examples. The abbreviation MAD, unfortunately, has been applied variously, so trust people's code first, then their algebraic or verbal definition, but use of an abbreviation MAD only not at all. In symmetric distributions, and some others, MAD as defined here is half the interquartile range. (Punning on MAD I resist as a little too obvious.)
    $endgroup$
    – Nick Cox
    17 hours ago








  • 3




    $begingroup$
    Also, note that software implementations of the median absolute deviation function can scale the MAD value by a constant factor from the form presented in this answer, so that its value coincides with the standard deviation for a normal distribution.
    $endgroup$
    – EdM
    17 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    @EdM Excellent point. Personally I dislike that practice unless people use some different term. It's no longer the MAD!
    $endgroup$
    – Nick Cox
    17 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @NickCox: the appeal of centring on the median is that the quantity always exists, whether or not the distribution enjoys a mean. This is the definition found in Wikipedia.
    $endgroup$
    – Xi'an
    16 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    MAD is Mutually Assured Destruction
    $endgroup$
    – kjetil b halvorsen
    15 hours ago



















3












$begingroup$

There is already a solution for this question on Math.stackexchange:



I summarize the answers:




  1. You can use that the variance is $overline{x^2} - overline {x}^2$, which takes only one pass (computing the mean and the mean of the squares simultaneously), but can be more prone to roundoff error if the variance is small compared with the mean.





  1. How about sum of squared pairwise differences ? Indeed, you can check by direct computation that


$$
2v_X = frac{1}{n(n-1)}sum_{1 le i < j le n}(x_i - x_j)^2.
$$






  1. The sample variance without mean is calculated as:
    $$ v_{X}=frac{1}{n-1}left [ sum_{i=1}^{n}x_{i}^{2}-frac{1}{n}left ( sum_{i=1}^{n}x_{i} right ) ^{2}right ] $$






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$













    Your Answer





    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
    });
    });
    }, "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "65"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: false,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: null,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstats.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f399445%2fcould-you-calculate-the-variance-of-data-using-the-median-or-something-other-tha%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes








    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    11












    $begingroup$

    The median absolute deviation is defined as
    $$text{MAD}(X) = text{median} |X-text{median}(X)|$$
    and is considered an alternative to the standard deviation. But this is not the variance. In particular, it always exists, whether or not $X$ allows for moments. For instance, the MAD of a standard Cauchy is equal to one since
    $$underbrace{Bbb P(|X-0|<1)}_text{0 is the median}=arctan(1)/pi-arctan(-1)/pi=frac{1}{2}$$






    share|cite|improve this answer











    $endgroup$









    • 7




      $begingroup$
      Newcomers to this idea should watch out also for mean absolute deviation from the mean (mean deviation, often) and median absolute deviation from the mean. I don't recall mean absolute deviation from the median, but am open to examples. The abbreviation MAD, unfortunately, has been applied variously, so trust people's code first, then their algebraic or verbal definition, but use of an abbreviation MAD only not at all. In symmetric distributions, and some others, MAD as defined here is half the interquartile range. (Punning on MAD I resist as a little too obvious.)
      $endgroup$
      – Nick Cox
      17 hours ago








    • 3




      $begingroup$
      Also, note that software implementations of the median absolute deviation function can scale the MAD value by a constant factor from the form presented in this answer, so that its value coincides with the standard deviation for a normal distribution.
      $endgroup$
      – EdM
      17 hours ago










    • $begingroup$
      @EdM Excellent point. Personally I dislike that practice unless people use some different term. It's no longer the MAD!
      $endgroup$
      – Nick Cox
      17 hours ago






    • 1




      $begingroup$
      @NickCox: the appeal of centring on the median is that the quantity always exists, whether or not the distribution enjoys a mean. This is the definition found in Wikipedia.
      $endgroup$
      – Xi'an
      16 hours ago










    • $begingroup$
      MAD is Mutually Assured Destruction
      $endgroup$
      – kjetil b halvorsen
      15 hours ago
















    11












    $begingroup$

    The median absolute deviation is defined as
    $$text{MAD}(X) = text{median} |X-text{median}(X)|$$
    and is considered an alternative to the standard deviation. But this is not the variance. In particular, it always exists, whether or not $X$ allows for moments. For instance, the MAD of a standard Cauchy is equal to one since
    $$underbrace{Bbb P(|X-0|<1)}_text{0 is the median}=arctan(1)/pi-arctan(-1)/pi=frac{1}{2}$$






    share|cite|improve this answer











    $endgroup$









    • 7




      $begingroup$
      Newcomers to this idea should watch out also for mean absolute deviation from the mean (mean deviation, often) and median absolute deviation from the mean. I don't recall mean absolute deviation from the median, but am open to examples. The abbreviation MAD, unfortunately, has been applied variously, so trust people's code first, then their algebraic or verbal definition, but use of an abbreviation MAD only not at all. In symmetric distributions, and some others, MAD as defined here is half the interquartile range. (Punning on MAD I resist as a little too obvious.)
      $endgroup$
      – Nick Cox
      17 hours ago








    • 3




      $begingroup$
      Also, note that software implementations of the median absolute deviation function can scale the MAD value by a constant factor from the form presented in this answer, so that its value coincides with the standard deviation for a normal distribution.
      $endgroup$
      – EdM
      17 hours ago










    • $begingroup$
      @EdM Excellent point. Personally I dislike that practice unless people use some different term. It's no longer the MAD!
      $endgroup$
      – Nick Cox
      17 hours ago






    • 1




      $begingroup$
      @NickCox: the appeal of centring on the median is that the quantity always exists, whether or not the distribution enjoys a mean. This is the definition found in Wikipedia.
      $endgroup$
      – Xi'an
      16 hours ago










    • $begingroup$
      MAD is Mutually Assured Destruction
      $endgroup$
      – kjetil b halvorsen
      15 hours ago














    11












    11








    11





    $begingroup$

    The median absolute deviation is defined as
    $$text{MAD}(X) = text{median} |X-text{median}(X)|$$
    and is considered an alternative to the standard deviation. But this is not the variance. In particular, it always exists, whether or not $X$ allows for moments. For instance, the MAD of a standard Cauchy is equal to one since
    $$underbrace{Bbb P(|X-0|<1)}_text{0 is the median}=arctan(1)/pi-arctan(-1)/pi=frac{1}{2}$$






    share|cite|improve this answer











    $endgroup$



    The median absolute deviation is defined as
    $$text{MAD}(X) = text{median} |X-text{median}(X)|$$
    and is considered an alternative to the standard deviation. But this is not the variance. In particular, it always exists, whether or not $X$ allows for moments. For instance, the MAD of a standard Cauchy is equal to one since
    $$underbrace{Bbb P(|X-0|<1)}_text{0 is the median}=arctan(1)/pi-arctan(-1)/pi=frac{1}{2}$$







    share|cite|improve this answer














    share|cite|improve this answer



    share|cite|improve this answer








    edited 13 hours ago









    ukemi

    1053




    1053










    answered 17 hours ago









    Xi'anXi'an

    58.9k897364




    58.9k897364








    • 7




      $begingroup$
      Newcomers to this idea should watch out also for mean absolute deviation from the mean (mean deviation, often) and median absolute deviation from the mean. I don't recall mean absolute deviation from the median, but am open to examples. The abbreviation MAD, unfortunately, has been applied variously, so trust people's code first, then their algebraic or verbal definition, but use of an abbreviation MAD only not at all. In symmetric distributions, and some others, MAD as defined here is half the interquartile range. (Punning on MAD I resist as a little too obvious.)
      $endgroup$
      – Nick Cox
      17 hours ago








    • 3




      $begingroup$
      Also, note that software implementations of the median absolute deviation function can scale the MAD value by a constant factor from the form presented in this answer, so that its value coincides with the standard deviation for a normal distribution.
      $endgroup$
      – EdM
      17 hours ago










    • $begingroup$
      @EdM Excellent point. Personally I dislike that practice unless people use some different term. It's no longer the MAD!
      $endgroup$
      – Nick Cox
      17 hours ago






    • 1




      $begingroup$
      @NickCox: the appeal of centring on the median is that the quantity always exists, whether or not the distribution enjoys a mean. This is the definition found in Wikipedia.
      $endgroup$
      – Xi'an
      16 hours ago










    • $begingroup$
      MAD is Mutually Assured Destruction
      $endgroup$
      – kjetil b halvorsen
      15 hours ago














    • 7




      $begingroup$
      Newcomers to this idea should watch out also for mean absolute deviation from the mean (mean deviation, often) and median absolute deviation from the mean. I don't recall mean absolute deviation from the median, but am open to examples. The abbreviation MAD, unfortunately, has been applied variously, so trust people's code first, then their algebraic or verbal definition, but use of an abbreviation MAD only not at all. In symmetric distributions, and some others, MAD as defined here is half the interquartile range. (Punning on MAD I resist as a little too obvious.)
      $endgroup$
      – Nick Cox
      17 hours ago








    • 3




      $begingroup$
      Also, note that software implementations of the median absolute deviation function can scale the MAD value by a constant factor from the form presented in this answer, so that its value coincides with the standard deviation for a normal distribution.
      $endgroup$
      – EdM
      17 hours ago










    • $begingroup$
      @EdM Excellent point. Personally I dislike that practice unless people use some different term. It's no longer the MAD!
      $endgroup$
      – Nick Cox
      17 hours ago






    • 1




      $begingroup$
      @NickCox: the appeal of centring on the median is that the quantity always exists, whether or not the distribution enjoys a mean. This is the definition found in Wikipedia.
      $endgroup$
      – Xi'an
      16 hours ago










    • $begingroup$
      MAD is Mutually Assured Destruction
      $endgroup$
      – kjetil b halvorsen
      15 hours ago








    7




    7




    $begingroup$
    Newcomers to this idea should watch out also for mean absolute deviation from the mean (mean deviation, often) and median absolute deviation from the mean. I don't recall mean absolute deviation from the median, but am open to examples. The abbreviation MAD, unfortunately, has been applied variously, so trust people's code first, then their algebraic or verbal definition, but use of an abbreviation MAD only not at all. In symmetric distributions, and some others, MAD as defined here is half the interquartile range. (Punning on MAD I resist as a little too obvious.)
    $endgroup$
    – Nick Cox
    17 hours ago






    $begingroup$
    Newcomers to this idea should watch out also for mean absolute deviation from the mean (mean deviation, often) and median absolute deviation from the mean. I don't recall mean absolute deviation from the median, but am open to examples. The abbreviation MAD, unfortunately, has been applied variously, so trust people's code first, then their algebraic or verbal definition, but use of an abbreviation MAD only not at all. In symmetric distributions, and some others, MAD as defined here is half the interquartile range. (Punning on MAD I resist as a little too obvious.)
    $endgroup$
    – Nick Cox
    17 hours ago






    3




    3




    $begingroup$
    Also, note that software implementations of the median absolute deviation function can scale the MAD value by a constant factor from the form presented in this answer, so that its value coincides with the standard deviation for a normal distribution.
    $endgroup$
    – EdM
    17 hours ago




    $begingroup$
    Also, note that software implementations of the median absolute deviation function can scale the MAD value by a constant factor from the form presented in this answer, so that its value coincides with the standard deviation for a normal distribution.
    $endgroup$
    – EdM
    17 hours ago












    $begingroup$
    @EdM Excellent point. Personally I dislike that practice unless people use some different term. It's no longer the MAD!
    $endgroup$
    – Nick Cox
    17 hours ago




    $begingroup$
    @EdM Excellent point. Personally I dislike that practice unless people use some different term. It's no longer the MAD!
    $endgroup$
    – Nick Cox
    17 hours ago




    1




    1




    $begingroup$
    @NickCox: the appeal of centring on the median is that the quantity always exists, whether or not the distribution enjoys a mean. This is the definition found in Wikipedia.
    $endgroup$
    – Xi'an
    16 hours ago




    $begingroup$
    @NickCox: the appeal of centring on the median is that the quantity always exists, whether or not the distribution enjoys a mean. This is the definition found in Wikipedia.
    $endgroup$
    – Xi'an
    16 hours ago












    $begingroup$
    MAD is Mutually Assured Destruction
    $endgroup$
    – kjetil b halvorsen
    15 hours ago




    $begingroup$
    MAD is Mutually Assured Destruction
    $endgroup$
    – kjetil b halvorsen
    15 hours ago













    3












    $begingroup$

    There is already a solution for this question on Math.stackexchange:



    I summarize the answers:




    1. You can use that the variance is $overline{x^2} - overline {x}^2$, which takes only one pass (computing the mean and the mean of the squares simultaneously), but can be more prone to roundoff error if the variance is small compared with the mean.





    1. How about sum of squared pairwise differences ? Indeed, you can check by direct computation that


    $$
    2v_X = frac{1}{n(n-1)}sum_{1 le i < j le n}(x_i - x_j)^2.
    $$






    1. The sample variance without mean is calculated as:
      $$ v_{X}=frac{1}{n-1}left [ sum_{i=1}^{n}x_{i}^{2}-frac{1}{n}left ( sum_{i=1}^{n}x_{i} right ) ^{2}right ] $$






    share|cite|improve this answer











    $endgroup$


















      3












      $begingroup$

      There is already a solution for this question on Math.stackexchange:



      I summarize the answers:




      1. You can use that the variance is $overline{x^2} - overline {x}^2$, which takes only one pass (computing the mean and the mean of the squares simultaneously), but can be more prone to roundoff error if the variance is small compared with the mean.





      1. How about sum of squared pairwise differences ? Indeed, you can check by direct computation that


      $$
      2v_X = frac{1}{n(n-1)}sum_{1 le i < j le n}(x_i - x_j)^2.
      $$






      1. The sample variance without mean is calculated as:
        $$ v_{X}=frac{1}{n-1}left [ sum_{i=1}^{n}x_{i}^{2}-frac{1}{n}left ( sum_{i=1}^{n}x_{i} right ) ^{2}right ] $$






      share|cite|improve this answer











      $endgroup$
















        3












        3








        3





        $begingroup$

        There is already a solution for this question on Math.stackexchange:



        I summarize the answers:




        1. You can use that the variance is $overline{x^2} - overline {x}^2$, which takes only one pass (computing the mean and the mean of the squares simultaneously), but can be more prone to roundoff error if the variance is small compared with the mean.





        1. How about sum of squared pairwise differences ? Indeed, you can check by direct computation that


        $$
        2v_X = frac{1}{n(n-1)}sum_{1 le i < j le n}(x_i - x_j)^2.
        $$






        1. The sample variance without mean is calculated as:
          $$ v_{X}=frac{1}{n-1}left [ sum_{i=1}^{n}x_{i}^{2}-frac{1}{n}left ( sum_{i=1}^{n}x_{i} right ) ^{2}right ] $$






        share|cite|improve this answer











        $endgroup$



        There is already a solution for this question on Math.stackexchange:



        I summarize the answers:




        1. You can use that the variance is $overline{x^2} - overline {x}^2$, which takes only one pass (computing the mean and the mean of the squares simultaneously), but can be more prone to roundoff error if the variance is small compared with the mean.





        1. How about sum of squared pairwise differences ? Indeed, you can check by direct computation that


        $$
        2v_X = frac{1}{n(n-1)}sum_{1 le i < j le n}(x_i - x_j)^2.
        $$






        1. The sample variance without mean is calculated as:
          $$ v_{X}=frac{1}{n-1}left [ sum_{i=1}^{n}x_{i}^{2}-frac{1}{n}left ( sum_{i=1}^{n}x_{i} right ) ^{2}right ] $$







        share|cite|improve this answer














        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer








        edited 8 hours ago

























        answered 9 hours ago









        FerdiFerdi

        3,86742355




        3,86742355






























            draft saved

            draft discarded




















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Cross Validated!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstats.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f399445%2fcould-you-calculate-the-variance-of-data-using-the-median-or-something-other-tha%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            He _____ here since 1970 . Answer needed [closed]What does “since he was so high” mean?Meaning of “catch birds for”?How do I ensure “since” takes the meaning I want?“Who cares here” meaningWhat does “right round toward” mean?the time tense (had now been detected)What does the phrase “ring around the roses” mean here?Correct usage of “visited upon”Meaning of “foiled rail sabotage bid”It was the third time I had gone to Rome or It is the third time I had been to Rome

            Bunad

            Færeyskur hestur Heimild | Tengill | Tilvísanir | LeiðsagnarvalRossið - síða um færeyska hrossið á færeyskuGott ár hjá færeyska hestinum