How is character development a major role in the plot of a story





.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty{
margin-bottom:0;
}
.everyonelovesstackoverflow{position:absolute;height:1px;width:1px;opacity:0;top:0;left:0;pointer-events:none;}








5















People mostly say that the characters of a story have to be developed first, but I don't really understand why characters play such an active role. Can't the characters simply be classified as objects?










share|improve this question






















  • 1





    It's not much fun reading about "objects", is it?

    – hspandher
    May 28 at 10:54


















5















People mostly say that the characters of a story have to be developed first, but I don't really understand why characters play such an active role. Can't the characters simply be classified as objects?










share|improve this question






















  • 1





    It's not much fun reading about "objects", is it?

    – hspandher
    May 28 at 10:54














5












5








5


1






People mostly say that the characters of a story have to be developed first, but I don't really understand why characters play such an active role. Can't the characters simply be classified as objects?










share|improve this question
















People mostly say that the characters of a story have to be developed first, but I don't really understand why characters play such an active role. Can't the characters simply be classified as objects?







characters character-development plot






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited May 27 at 8:43









Liquid

12.8k3 gold badges39 silver badges104 bronze badges




12.8k3 gold badges39 silver badges104 bronze badges










asked May 27 at 8:13









JaystarJaystar

2913 silver badges14 bronze badges




2913 silver badges14 bronze badges











  • 1





    It's not much fun reading about "objects", is it?

    – hspandher
    May 28 at 10:54














  • 1





    It's not much fun reading about "objects", is it?

    – hspandher
    May 28 at 10:54








1




1





It's not much fun reading about "objects", is it?

– hspandher
May 28 at 10:54





It's not much fun reading about "objects", is it?

– hspandher
May 28 at 10:54










6 Answers
6






active

oldest

votes


















20
















The main distinction to be made here is between character-driven stories and plot-driven stories.



Character-driven stories, as you can imagine, focus mainly on the characters, their struggles, their growth and their relationships. The central questions of these stories could be, What will Bob do in this situation? Will his relationship with Alice survive? How can Charlie react to such an event? and so on.
In this case, there must be at least a subset of characters (e.g. the main cast) that have to be well fleshed out, so they can't be classified as objects.



Plot-driven stories, on the other hand, tend to put more emphasis on the plot. The main question could be Will the great evil be defeated? Can this nation win the war? Can the police stop this killer? etc.
Characters are less central in these kind of stories.



For example, a lot of detective stories revolve around getting the guilty in jail. Those stories do have interesting characters (a troubled detective, his steadfast colleague, a shady informer, the witty morgue doctor, and so on) but developing this character is not the point. The point is the current case (in other words: the plot).
The main character in those kind of stories usually gets some development, but its often diluted in a series of books rather than a single one.



So, in a way, characters are instrumental in pushing the plot forward.



Yet I wouldn't say that characters may be considered objects.



Even when you're writing a plot-driven story, whether it is a thriller, an action packed adventure, a war novel or a daring science fiction, treating your characters like disposable objects is a risky operation at best.



The audience won't feel engaged towards characters who are as shallow as cardboard. Shallow characters are bad for a story since they can dim a good plot.



Another risk is that if you don't define your characters, you risk making them inconsistent. Good stories are made up by conflict, but it has to be meaningful conflict. Characterization is a tool that helps you determine what choices a character should or should not make; and which character should move the plot forward.



If your cast is just a bunch of faceless puppets ready to do anything that's needed to advance the story, the audience will notice.






share|improve this answer























  • 1





    "The witty morgue doctor" :D have an upvote!

    – Brandon_J
    May 27 at 21:15











  • @Brandon_J I do miss some witty morgue doctor those days

    – Liquid
    May 27 at 21:43











  • Not disagreeing with you, but how deep was Indiana Jones in RotLA (or ToD, for that matter)?

    – RonJohn
    May 27 at 23:09











  • Btw, RotLA is Raiders of the Lost Ark and ToD is Temple of Doom

    – aloisdg
    May 28 at 9:40











  • As an example, I would say that Foundation 1&2 is more plot-driven, but Foundation 3&4 is more character-driven.

    – aloisdg
    May 28 at 9:42



















11
















Writing stories is all about evoking feelings and emotions in the reader - specific emotions you want to evoke with your story. That's what sets a story apart from a report, which is to state facts, be informative and neutral. Writing a story like one writes a report is one of most common, fundamental errors of beginning writers. The writing is dry. The reader's reaction to such a story is "Okay, so that happened. So what? Why should I care? I wasted my time reading this."



Developing a character is one of best ways to form an emotional bond between the character and the reader - a feeling of fellowship, identifying as the character, compassion - or even just cold hate for the character. With such a bond the events of the story have an impact, they cause emotions, make the story enthralling and unforgettable. Without that? Blah. Something happened somewhere to someone, nobody cares.






share|improve this answer

































    7
















    Orson Scott Card described 4 types of story he called M.I.C.E. The goal is not to exclusively write 1 type of story, but to be aware which type your story is, and then work to include some of the other types as support. The technique is called M.I.C.E. Quotient.



    M.I.C.E:




    • Milieau ("big genre" setting, journey, time/place)

    • Idea (transformative inventions, What if…?, alternate history)

    • Character (internal conflict, want/need, protagonist/antagonist)

    • Event (catastrophe, political change, external conflict)


    Mary Robinette Kowal has adapted this idea into a nested structure called M.A.C.E., and she breaks down how each of these story-types are expected to open and close. She goes further by explaining that each element needs to close (in her words: "be answered") in the reverse order that they opened (each is nested within another).
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yAJT_-gpG4U



    What both authors emphasize about these structures is that it's extremely rare to find a story that ignores 1 or more of these narrative elements – when they do exist, they aren't very good. Card and Kowal are considered experts at analyzing and writing fiction, so I offer this answer so you can do more research and decide if and how to add these techniques to your writing.



    My personal advice is if you honestly have no interest in developing empathy for your characters, and prefer to move them around as objects like chessmen, you might feel more at home writing for a videogame or RPG where the "characters" are blank slates.






    share|improve this answer

































      5
















      If your characters are interchangeable, forgettable and one dimensional you will have trouble getting readers to read much of your book.



      Readers meet a character and watch, waiting for something to happen. If we don’t care enough about the character because they are just a placeholder, we put the book down.



      Plots happen to someone and if that someone is an undeveloped element and not a character, we don’t care.



      I was reading a book set during the French Revolution - it had a strong plot and a few interesting characters, but others were rather flat. I read on because one character was a young nobleman with republican views who joined the revolution. The author killed off a lot of interesting characters, but I kept reading because this guy had a problem and I wanted to see how it was resolved. I cared about him. She killed him off too and I put the book down - no one left I cared to follow.



      Memorable characters are either hard work to create or they come as inspiration. They fuel even the most plot driven story - they are the reason the reader turns the page.



      My piece is a character driven thriller and before I started writing it, I spent weeks thinking about two characters (one is minor, yet pivotal). I had a clear plot and my characters and I started writing. My characters reached a point where they diverged from the plot, essentially telling me they had a better idea. They did and the book went in a direction I had not foreseen.



      My point is, had I held to my original plot, forced it to play out as I had planned, I would have 80k words of a generic novel that I would probably not want to read - at least, not twice. Following my characters, I have a much longer work that I am proud of, enjoy reading, and is fun to write.



      I have no idea how it will end, suspect I will slip the original plot in sometime in the future and trust my characters to tell the tale. It is their story, I am just writing it.






      share|improve this answer

































        0
















        No, characters aren't interchangeable. If they are, nobody wants to read it.



        The plot happens to the characters, and people read to identify with the characters, as people, and they develop feelings for them (good and bad). Even in a plot-heavy story line, like those used in the current series Elementary (last season airing now; a Sherlock spin), the crime and how it was done is the "plot", but almost unimportant: Fans like that the plot is usually very clever, but what they remember about episodes is how the relationships develop: Joan (Dr. Watson) is unhappy living in London, Sherlock is concerned, Marcus stages a private intervention with Captain Gregson over his treatment of Sherlock, Sherlock tries to address some of Joan's complaints about the DI, and the cliffhanger: Captain Gregson gets shot, and might not make it. Next mystery: Who shot Captain Gregson?



        Let's see, what was the crime in this episode? I forget, Sherlock solved it somehow. What we are watching is a man with an extraordinary skill that struggles with personal relationships but as a consequence of that values the few he does have all the more.



        I'll say it again: Plots happen to characters, and that is why people are reading the story. In Harry Potter, the magic setting is very clever, the plots are basic mystery, but we are really reading to see how those things affect Harry Potter, Hermione Granger and Ron Weasley (and a handful of others).



        If you treat your characters like objects or chess pieces, nobody will care about them. When they stop caring what happens next to your character they will put the book down. Because it doesn't matter what happens next in the plot, if they aren't rooting for anybody, and aren't frightened for them, or frightened of the villain, then it isn't going to change anything for anybody they care about.



        On the other hand, the more characters they DO care about, the less likely they are to put the book down.



        I often say here, what keeps readers turning pages is wondering what happens next. How the scene will work out, how the chapter will work out, and eventually how the Act or whole book will work out. But the biggest reason they want to know what happens next is because it will have an effect on the characters.



        You do have to have a plot, so something happens to the characters and readers can anticipate things happening to the characters. Complex and clever plots are entertaining; they keep the uncertainty of what happens next to the characters at a high level. Elaborate imaginative settings can be entertaining, they keep the reader wondering what they will see next, and often present fun problems for the characters to deal with.



        Without characters to care about, those elements are worthless.






        share|improve this answer

































          0
















          First. If you develop the characters first, the plot first or do them iteratively... or just start to write and then edit to make the characters work in the final version is completely a question of taste and writing style.



          You do not have to create the characters first.



          You should, however, as I will get into below, have well-developed characters, plot, and theme to make the story work.



          As has been mentioned in other answers, you use characters to create an emotional response in the reader and a connection with the story. However, there's more to it than that.



          If you don't utilize characters fully in your story you're losing half your set of tools to create conflict. You're also making it much harder to make the theme of your story work. In the worst case scenario, you risk making the whole thing limp.



          Inner conflict vs Outer conflict



          A story usually has two versions of conflict. The inner conflict, taking place in the head of the character, and the outer conflict taking place in the world outside the character.



          An important aspect of the inner conflict is about character development (a.k.a. change arcs). This development is usually about how the (main) character stops believing in the lie of the story and starts believing in the truth (positive change arc). Other versions exist; truth to lie (corruption change arc), lie to worse lie (fall arc), lie to depressing truth (disillusion arc).



          The outer conflict is, in short how the characters (protagonist, antagonist, and various sidekicks) try to make their lies and truths manifest in the physical world.



          The Flat Arc / Testing Arc



          Apart from the above versions of character development, there's also a version where the character defends their truth against a lie-ridden world. This is called a flat or testing arc.



          This type of character development is what you'll see in superhero stories, and may also be common in plot-driven stories. It may seem as if there is no character development, and there isn't... in the main character... but instead, it happens in other supporting characters around the main character.



          Character development is all about the character changing their relationship to the truth and the lie in the story, however, even a flat arc character can evolve, learn new skills, become more confident in their truth, or more skillful in using it, they just never exchange their truth for the lie. Not even when they are sure their truth is about as effective against the lie as a straw of grass against a tornado.



          Of course, just because the character doesn't change, doesn't mean they don't get a thorough beating in the story. They usually get to pay dearly for daring to believe in the truth. Sometimes even with their lives.



          Character, Plot, Theme



          The three elements character, plot, and theme are among the more important in a story.



          The theme can be described as the conflict between a truth and an opposing lie (or the conflict between a group of related truths and an opposing group of related lies—it can get more or less complex).



          The trick with the theme is to weave it into the story so skillfully the reader almost isn't consciously aware it's even there.



          There are many ways this can be done but in short, it's about showing, not telling the lies and truths. If your characters never utter them in dialog, great! Or at least not have a long monolog about them... Instead, make the reader understand what the characters believe by their actions.



          The theme connects to the characters by having the truths and lies cause character development.



          The inner conflict consists of the protagonistic and antagonistic characters being proponents of the truth and lie respectively.



          The outer conflict, the plot, is about these characters doing things to try to manifest their lies and truths in the outer world (i.e. shaping the world according to their beliefs). In doing so, they make the outer conflict a manifestation of the inner.



          Without this triangle of theme, character, and plot, the story is at risk of seeming limp, illogical and/or superficial. Not to mention that with less developed characters it will only contain half the amount of conflict you could otherwise pack into it.






          share|improve this answer



























            Your Answer








            StackExchange.ready(function() {
            var channelOptions = {
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "166"
            };
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
            createEditor();
            });
            }
            else {
            createEditor();
            }
            });

            function createEditor() {
            StackExchange.prepareEditor({
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
            convertImagesToLinks: false,
            noModals: true,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: null,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            imageUploader: {
            brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
            contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/"u003ecc by-sa 4.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
            allowUrls: true
            },
            noCode: true, onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            });


            }
            });















            draft saved

            draft discarded
















            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fwriting.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f45458%2fhow-is-character-development-a-major-role-in-the-plot-of-a-story%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown

























            6 Answers
            6






            active

            oldest

            votes








            6 Answers
            6






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes









            20
















            The main distinction to be made here is between character-driven stories and plot-driven stories.



            Character-driven stories, as you can imagine, focus mainly on the characters, their struggles, their growth and their relationships. The central questions of these stories could be, What will Bob do in this situation? Will his relationship with Alice survive? How can Charlie react to such an event? and so on.
            In this case, there must be at least a subset of characters (e.g. the main cast) that have to be well fleshed out, so they can't be classified as objects.



            Plot-driven stories, on the other hand, tend to put more emphasis on the plot. The main question could be Will the great evil be defeated? Can this nation win the war? Can the police stop this killer? etc.
            Characters are less central in these kind of stories.



            For example, a lot of detective stories revolve around getting the guilty in jail. Those stories do have interesting characters (a troubled detective, his steadfast colleague, a shady informer, the witty morgue doctor, and so on) but developing this character is not the point. The point is the current case (in other words: the plot).
            The main character in those kind of stories usually gets some development, but its often diluted in a series of books rather than a single one.



            So, in a way, characters are instrumental in pushing the plot forward.



            Yet I wouldn't say that characters may be considered objects.



            Even when you're writing a plot-driven story, whether it is a thriller, an action packed adventure, a war novel or a daring science fiction, treating your characters like disposable objects is a risky operation at best.



            The audience won't feel engaged towards characters who are as shallow as cardboard. Shallow characters are bad for a story since they can dim a good plot.



            Another risk is that if you don't define your characters, you risk making them inconsistent. Good stories are made up by conflict, but it has to be meaningful conflict. Characterization is a tool that helps you determine what choices a character should or should not make; and which character should move the plot forward.



            If your cast is just a bunch of faceless puppets ready to do anything that's needed to advance the story, the audience will notice.






            share|improve this answer























            • 1





              "The witty morgue doctor" :D have an upvote!

              – Brandon_J
              May 27 at 21:15











            • @Brandon_J I do miss some witty morgue doctor those days

              – Liquid
              May 27 at 21:43











            • Not disagreeing with you, but how deep was Indiana Jones in RotLA (or ToD, for that matter)?

              – RonJohn
              May 27 at 23:09











            • Btw, RotLA is Raiders of the Lost Ark and ToD is Temple of Doom

              – aloisdg
              May 28 at 9:40











            • As an example, I would say that Foundation 1&2 is more plot-driven, but Foundation 3&4 is more character-driven.

              – aloisdg
              May 28 at 9:42
















            20
















            The main distinction to be made here is between character-driven stories and plot-driven stories.



            Character-driven stories, as you can imagine, focus mainly on the characters, their struggles, their growth and their relationships. The central questions of these stories could be, What will Bob do in this situation? Will his relationship with Alice survive? How can Charlie react to such an event? and so on.
            In this case, there must be at least a subset of characters (e.g. the main cast) that have to be well fleshed out, so they can't be classified as objects.



            Plot-driven stories, on the other hand, tend to put more emphasis on the plot. The main question could be Will the great evil be defeated? Can this nation win the war? Can the police stop this killer? etc.
            Characters are less central in these kind of stories.



            For example, a lot of detective stories revolve around getting the guilty in jail. Those stories do have interesting characters (a troubled detective, his steadfast colleague, a shady informer, the witty morgue doctor, and so on) but developing this character is not the point. The point is the current case (in other words: the plot).
            The main character in those kind of stories usually gets some development, but its often diluted in a series of books rather than a single one.



            So, in a way, characters are instrumental in pushing the plot forward.



            Yet I wouldn't say that characters may be considered objects.



            Even when you're writing a plot-driven story, whether it is a thriller, an action packed adventure, a war novel or a daring science fiction, treating your characters like disposable objects is a risky operation at best.



            The audience won't feel engaged towards characters who are as shallow as cardboard. Shallow characters are bad for a story since they can dim a good plot.



            Another risk is that if you don't define your characters, you risk making them inconsistent. Good stories are made up by conflict, but it has to be meaningful conflict. Characterization is a tool that helps you determine what choices a character should or should not make; and which character should move the plot forward.



            If your cast is just a bunch of faceless puppets ready to do anything that's needed to advance the story, the audience will notice.






            share|improve this answer























            • 1





              "The witty morgue doctor" :D have an upvote!

              – Brandon_J
              May 27 at 21:15











            • @Brandon_J I do miss some witty morgue doctor those days

              – Liquid
              May 27 at 21:43











            • Not disagreeing with you, but how deep was Indiana Jones in RotLA (or ToD, for that matter)?

              – RonJohn
              May 27 at 23:09











            • Btw, RotLA is Raiders of the Lost Ark and ToD is Temple of Doom

              – aloisdg
              May 28 at 9:40











            • As an example, I would say that Foundation 1&2 is more plot-driven, but Foundation 3&4 is more character-driven.

              – aloisdg
              May 28 at 9:42














            20














            20










            20









            The main distinction to be made here is between character-driven stories and plot-driven stories.



            Character-driven stories, as you can imagine, focus mainly on the characters, their struggles, their growth and their relationships. The central questions of these stories could be, What will Bob do in this situation? Will his relationship with Alice survive? How can Charlie react to such an event? and so on.
            In this case, there must be at least a subset of characters (e.g. the main cast) that have to be well fleshed out, so they can't be classified as objects.



            Plot-driven stories, on the other hand, tend to put more emphasis on the plot. The main question could be Will the great evil be defeated? Can this nation win the war? Can the police stop this killer? etc.
            Characters are less central in these kind of stories.



            For example, a lot of detective stories revolve around getting the guilty in jail. Those stories do have interesting characters (a troubled detective, his steadfast colleague, a shady informer, the witty morgue doctor, and so on) but developing this character is not the point. The point is the current case (in other words: the plot).
            The main character in those kind of stories usually gets some development, but its often diluted in a series of books rather than a single one.



            So, in a way, characters are instrumental in pushing the plot forward.



            Yet I wouldn't say that characters may be considered objects.



            Even when you're writing a plot-driven story, whether it is a thriller, an action packed adventure, a war novel or a daring science fiction, treating your characters like disposable objects is a risky operation at best.



            The audience won't feel engaged towards characters who are as shallow as cardboard. Shallow characters are bad for a story since they can dim a good plot.



            Another risk is that if you don't define your characters, you risk making them inconsistent. Good stories are made up by conflict, but it has to be meaningful conflict. Characterization is a tool that helps you determine what choices a character should or should not make; and which character should move the plot forward.



            If your cast is just a bunch of faceless puppets ready to do anything that's needed to advance the story, the audience will notice.






            share|improve this answer















            The main distinction to be made here is between character-driven stories and plot-driven stories.



            Character-driven stories, as you can imagine, focus mainly on the characters, their struggles, their growth and their relationships. The central questions of these stories could be, What will Bob do in this situation? Will his relationship with Alice survive? How can Charlie react to such an event? and so on.
            In this case, there must be at least a subset of characters (e.g. the main cast) that have to be well fleshed out, so they can't be classified as objects.



            Plot-driven stories, on the other hand, tend to put more emphasis on the plot. The main question could be Will the great evil be defeated? Can this nation win the war? Can the police stop this killer? etc.
            Characters are less central in these kind of stories.



            For example, a lot of detective stories revolve around getting the guilty in jail. Those stories do have interesting characters (a troubled detective, his steadfast colleague, a shady informer, the witty morgue doctor, and so on) but developing this character is not the point. The point is the current case (in other words: the plot).
            The main character in those kind of stories usually gets some development, but its often diluted in a series of books rather than a single one.



            So, in a way, characters are instrumental in pushing the plot forward.



            Yet I wouldn't say that characters may be considered objects.



            Even when you're writing a plot-driven story, whether it is a thriller, an action packed adventure, a war novel or a daring science fiction, treating your characters like disposable objects is a risky operation at best.



            The audience won't feel engaged towards characters who are as shallow as cardboard. Shallow characters are bad for a story since they can dim a good plot.



            Another risk is that if you don't define your characters, you risk making them inconsistent. Good stories are made up by conflict, but it has to be meaningful conflict. Characterization is a tool that helps you determine what choices a character should or should not make; and which character should move the plot forward.



            If your cast is just a bunch of faceless puppets ready to do anything that's needed to advance the story, the audience will notice.







            share|improve this answer














            share|improve this answer



            share|improve this answer








            edited May 28 at 20:50









            Community

            1




            1










            answered May 27 at 9:12









            LiquidLiquid

            12.8k3 gold badges39 silver badges104 bronze badges




            12.8k3 gold badges39 silver badges104 bronze badges











            • 1





              "The witty morgue doctor" :D have an upvote!

              – Brandon_J
              May 27 at 21:15











            • @Brandon_J I do miss some witty morgue doctor those days

              – Liquid
              May 27 at 21:43











            • Not disagreeing with you, but how deep was Indiana Jones in RotLA (or ToD, for that matter)?

              – RonJohn
              May 27 at 23:09











            • Btw, RotLA is Raiders of the Lost Ark and ToD is Temple of Doom

              – aloisdg
              May 28 at 9:40











            • As an example, I would say that Foundation 1&2 is more plot-driven, but Foundation 3&4 is more character-driven.

              – aloisdg
              May 28 at 9:42














            • 1





              "The witty morgue doctor" :D have an upvote!

              – Brandon_J
              May 27 at 21:15











            • @Brandon_J I do miss some witty morgue doctor those days

              – Liquid
              May 27 at 21:43











            • Not disagreeing with you, but how deep was Indiana Jones in RotLA (or ToD, for that matter)?

              – RonJohn
              May 27 at 23:09











            • Btw, RotLA is Raiders of the Lost Ark and ToD is Temple of Doom

              – aloisdg
              May 28 at 9:40











            • As an example, I would say that Foundation 1&2 is more plot-driven, but Foundation 3&4 is more character-driven.

              – aloisdg
              May 28 at 9:42








            1




            1





            "The witty morgue doctor" :D have an upvote!

            – Brandon_J
            May 27 at 21:15





            "The witty morgue doctor" :D have an upvote!

            – Brandon_J
            May 27 at 21:15













            @Brandon_J I do miss some witty morgue doctor those days

            – Liquid
            May 27 at 21:43





            @Brandon_J I do miss some witty morgue doctor those days

            – Liquid
            May 27 at 21:43













            Not disagreeing with you, but how deep was Indiana Jones in RotLA (or ToD, for that matter)?

            – RonJohn
            May 27 at 23:09





            Not disagreeing with you, but how deep was Indiana Jones in RotLA (or ToD, for that matter)?

            – RonJohn
            May 27 at 23:09













            Btw, RotLA is Raiders of the Lost Ark and ToD is Temple of Doom

            – aloisdg
            May 28 at 9:40





            Btw, RotLA is Raiders of the Lost Ark and ToD is Temple of Doom

            – aloisdg
            May 28 at 9:40













            As an example, I would say that Foundation 1&2 is more plot-driven, but Foundation 3&4 is more character-driven.

            – aloisdg
            May 28 at 9:42





            As an example, I would say that Foundation 1&2 is more plot-driven, but Foundation 3&4 is more character-driven.

            – aloisdg
            May 28 at 9:42













            11
















            Writing stories is all about evoking feelings and emotions in the reader - specific emotions you want to evoke with your story. That's what sets a story apart from a report, which is to state facts, be informative and neutral. Writing a story like one writes a report is one of most common, fundamental errors of beginning writers. The writing is dry. The reader's reaction to such a story is "Okay, so that happened. So what? Why should I care? I wasted my time reading this."



            Developing a character is one of best ways to form an emotional bond between the character and the reader - a feeling of fellowship, identifying as the character, compassion - or even just cold hate for the character. With such a bond the events of the story have an impact, they cause emotions, make the story enthralling and unforgettable. Without that? Blah. Something happened somewhere to someone, nobody cares.






            share|improve this answer






























              11
















              Writing stories is all about evoking feelings and emotions in the reader - specific emotions you want to evoke with your story. That's what sets a story apart from a report, which is to state facts, be informative and neutral. Writing a story like one writes a report is one of most common, fundamental errors of beginning writers. The writing is dry. The reader's reaction to such a story is "Okay, so that happened. So what? Why should I care? I wasted my time reading this."



              Developing a character is one of best ways to form an emotional bond between the character and the reader - a feeling of fellowship, identifying as the character, compassion - or even just cold hate for the character. With such a bond the events of the story have an impact, they cause emotions, make the story enthralling and unforgettable. Without that? Blah. Something happened somewhere to someone, nobody cares.






              share|improve this answer




























                11














                11










                11









                Writing stories is all about evoking feelings and emotions in the reader - specific emotions you want to evoke with your story. That's what sets a story apart from a report, which is to state facts, be informative and neutral. Writing a story like one writes a report is one of most common, fundamental errors of beginning writers. The writing is dry. The reader's reaction to such a story is "Okay, so that happened. So what? Why should I care? I wasted my time reading this."



                Developing a character is one of best ways to form an emotional bond between the character and the reader - a feeling of fellowship, identifying as the character, compassion - or even just cold hate for the character. With such a bond the events of the story have an impact, they cause emotions, make the story enthralling and unforgettable. Without that? Blah. Something happened somewhere to someone, nobody cares.






                share|improve this answer













                Writing stories is all about evoking feelings and emotions in the reader - specific emotions you want to evoke with your story. That's what sets a story apart from a report, which is to state facts, be informative and neutral. Writing a story like one writes a report is one of most common, fundamental errors of beginning writers. The writing is dry. The reader's reaction to such a story is "Okay, so that happened. So what? Why should I care? I wasted my time reading this."



                Developing a character is one of best ways to form an emotional bond between the character and the reader - a feeling of fellowship, identifying as the character, compassion - or even just cold hate for the character. With such a bond the events of the story have an impact, they cause emotions, make the story enthralling and unforgettable. Without that? Blah. Something happened somewhere to someone, nobody cares.







                share|improve this answer












                share|improve this answer



                share|improve this answer










                answered May 27 at 9:00









                SF.SF.

                14k23 silver badges52 bronze badges




                14k23 silver badges52 bronze badges


























                    7
















                    Orson Scott Card described 4 types of story he called M.I.C.E. The goal is not to exclusively write 1 type of story, but to be aware which type your story is, and then work to include some of the other types as support. The technique is called M.I.C.E. Quotient.



                    M.I.C.E:




                    • Milieau ("big genre" setting, journey, time/place)

                    • Idea (transformative inventions, What if…?, alternate history)

                    • Character (internal conflict, want/need, protagonist/antagonist)

                    • Event (catastrophe, political change, external conflict)


                    Mary Robinette Kowal has adapted this idea into a nested structure called M.A.C.E., and she breaks down how each of these story-types are expected to open and close. She goes further by explaining that each element needs to close (in her words: "be answered") in the reverse order that they opened (each is nested within another).
                    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yAJT_-gpG4U



                    What both authors emphasize about these structures is that it's extremely rare to find a story that ignores 1 or more of these narrative elements – when they do exist, they aren't very good. Card and Kowal are considered experts at analyzing and writing fiction, so I offer this answer so you can do more research and decide if and how to add these techniques to your writing.



                    My personal advice is if you honestly have no interest in developing empathy for your characters, and prefer to move them around as objects like chessmen, you might feel more at home writing for a videogame or RPG where the "characters" are blank slates.






                    share|improve this answer






























                      7
















                      Orson Scott Card described 4 types of story he called M.I.C.E. The goal is not to exclusively write 1 type of story, but to be aware which type your story is, and then work to include some of the other types as support. The technique is called M.I.C.E. Quotient.



                      M.I.C.E:




                      • Milieau ("big genre" setting, journey, time/place)

                      • Idea (transformative inventions, What if…?, alternate history)

                      • Character (internal conflict, want/need, protagonist/antagonist)

                      • Event (catastrophe, political change, external conflict)


                      Mary Robinette Kowal has adapted this idea into a nested structure called M.A.C.E., and she breaks down how each of these story-types are expected to open and close. She goes further by explaining that each element needs to close (in her words: "be answered") in the reverse order that they opened (each is nested within another).
                      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yAJT_-gpG4U



                      What both authors emphasize about these structures is that it's extremely rare to find a story that ignores 1 or more of these narrative elements – when they do exist, they aren't very good. Card and Kowal are considered experts at analyzing and writing fiction, so I offer this answer so you can do more research and decide if and how to add these techniques to your writing.



                      My personal advice is if you honestly have no interest in developing empathy for your characters, and prefer to move them around as objects like chessmen, you might feel more at home writing for a videogame or RPG where the "characters" are blank slates.






                      share|improve this answer




























                        7














                        7










                        7









                        Orson Scott Card described 4 types of story he called M.I.C.E. The goal is not to exclusively write 1 type of story, but to be aware which type your story is, and then work to include some of the other types as support. The technique is called M.I.C.E. Quotient.



                        M.I.C.E:




                        • Milieau ("big genre" setting, journey, time/place)

                        • Idea (transformative inventions, What if…?, alternate history)

                        • Character (internal conflict, want/need, protagonist/antagonist)

                        • Event (catastrophe, political change, external conflict)


                        Mary Robinette Kowal has adapted this idea into a nested structure called M.A.C.E., and she breaks down how each of these story-types are expected to open and close. She goes further by explaining that each element needs to close (in her words: "be answered") in the reverse order that they opened (each is nested within another).
                        https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yAJT_-gpG4U



                        What both authors emphasize about these structures is that it's extremely rare to find a story that ignores 1 or more of these narrative elements – when they do exist, they aren't very good. Card and Kowal are considered experts at analyzing and writing fiction, so I offer this answer so you can do more research and decide if and how to add these techniques to your writing.



                        My personal advice is if you honestly have no interest in developing empathy for your characters, and prefer to move them around as objects like chessmen, you might feel more at home writing for a videogame or RPG where the "characters" are blank slates.






                        share|improve this answer













                        Orson Scott Card described 4 types of story he called M.I.C.E. The goal is not to exclusively write 1 type of story, but to be aware which type your story is, and then work to include some of the other types as support. The technique is called M.I.C.E. Quotient.



                        M.I.C.E:




                        • Milieau ("big genre" setting, journey, time/place)

                        • Idea (transformative inventions, What if…?, alternate history)

                        • Character (internal conflict, want/need, protagonist/antagonist)

                        • Event (catastrophe, political change, external conflict)


                        Mary Robinette Kowal has adapted this idea into a nested structure called M.A.C.E., and she breaks down how each of these story-types are expected to open and close. She goes further by explaining that each element needs to close (in her words: "be answered") in the reverse order that they opened (each is nested within another).
                        https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yAJT_-gpG4U



                        What both authors emphasize about these structures is that it's extremely rare to find a story that ignores 1 or more of these narrative elements – when they do exist, they aren't very good. Card and Kowal are considered experts at analyzing and writing fiction, so I offer this answer so you can do more research and decide if and how to add these techniques to your writing.



                        My personal advice is if you honestly have no interest in developing empathy for your characters, and prefer to move them around as objects like chessmen, you might feel more at home writing for a videogame or RPG where the "characters" are blank slates.







                        share|improve this answer












                        share|improve this answer



                        share|improve this answer










                        answered May 27 at 12:41









                        wetcircuitwetcircuit

                        20.4k2 gold badges34 silver badges99 bronze badges




                        20.4k2 gold badges34 silver badges99 bronze badges


























                            5
















                            If your characters are interchangeable, forgettable and one dimensional you will have trouble getting readers to read much of your book.



                            Readers meet a character and watch, waiting for something to happen. If we don’t care enough about the character because they are just a placeholder, we put the book down.



                            Plots happen to someone and if that someone is an undeveloped element and not a character, we don’t care.



                            I was reading a book set during the French Revolution - it had a strong plot and a few interesting characters, but others were rather flat. I read on because one character was a young nobleman with republican views who joined the revolution. The author killed off a lot of interesting characters, but I kept reading because this guy had a problem and I wanted to see how it was resolved. I cared about him. She killed him off too and I put the book down - no one left I cared to follow.



                            Memorable characters are either hard work to create or they come as inspiration. They fuel even the most plot driven story - they are the reason the reader turns the page.



                            My piece is a character driven thriller and before I started writing it, I spent weeks thinking about two characters (one is minor, yet pivotal). I had a clear plot and my characters and I started writing. My characters reached a point where they diverged from the plot, essentially telling me they had a better idea. They did and the book went in a direction I had not foreseen.



                            My point is, had I held to my original plot, forced it to play out as I had planned, I would have 80k words of a generic novel that I would probably not want to read - at least, not twice. Following my characters, I have a much longer work that I am proud of, enjoy reading, and is fun to write.



                            I have no idea how it will end, suspect I will slip the original plot in sometime in the future and trust my characters to tell the tale. It is their story, I am just writing it.






                            share|improve this answer






























                              5
















                              If your characters are interchangeable, forgettable and one dimensional you will have trouble getting readers to read much of your book.



                              Readers meet a character and watch, waiting for something to happen. If we don’t care enough about the character because they are just a placeholder, we put the book down.



                              Plots happen to someone and if that someone is an undeveloped element and not a character, we don’t care.



                              I was reading a book set during the French Revolution - it had a strong plot and a few interesting characters, but others were rather flat. I read on because one character was a young nobleman with republican views who joined the revolution. The author killed off a lot of interesting characters, but I kept reading because this guy had a problem and I wanted to see how it was resolved. I cared about him. She killed him off too and I put the book down - no one left I cared to follow.



                              Memorable characters are either hard work to create or they come as inspiration. They fuel even the most plot driven story - they are the reason the reader turns the page.



                              My piece is a character driven thriller and before I started writing it, I spent weeks thinking about two characters (one is minor, yet pivotal). I had a clear plot and my characters and I started writing. My characters reached a point where they diverged from the plot, essentially telling me they had a better idea. They did and the book went in a direction I had not foreseen.



                              My point is, had I held to my original plot, forced it to play out as I had planned, I would have 80k words of a generic novel that I would probably not want to read - at least, not twice. Following my characters, I have a much longer work that I am proud of, enjoy reading, and is fun to write.



                              I have no idea how it will end, suspect I will slip the original plot in sometime in the future and trust my characters to tell the tale. It is their story, I am just writing it.






                              share|improve this answer




























                                5














                                5










                                5









                                If your characters are interchangeable, forgettable and one dimensional you will have trouble getting readers to read much of your book.



                                Readers meet a character and watch, waiting for something to happen. If we don’t care enough about the character because they are just a placeholder, we put the book down.



                                Plots happen to someone and if that someone is an undeveloped element and not a character, we don’t care.



                                I was reading a book set during the French Revolution - it had a strong plot and a few interesting characters, but others were rather flat. I read on because one character was a young nobleman with republican views who joined the revolution. The author killed off a lot of interesting characters, but I kept reading because this guy had a problem and I wanted to see how it was resolved. I cared about him. She killed him off too and I put the book down - no one left I cared to follow.



                                Memorable characters are either hard work to create or they come as inspiration. They fuel even the most plot driven story - they are the reason the reader turns the page.



                                My piece is a character driven thriller and before I started writing it, I spent weeks thinking about two characters (one is minor, yet pivotal). I had a clear plot and my characters and I started writing. My characters reached a point where they diverged from the plot, essentially telling me they had a better idea. They did and the book went in a direction I had not foreseen.



                                My point is, had I held to my original plot, forced it to play out as I had planned, I would have 80k words of a generic novel that I would probably not want to read - at least, not twice. Following my characters, I have a much longer work that I am proud of, enjoy reading, and is fun to write.



                                I have no idea how it will end, suspect I will slip the original plot in sometime in the future and trust my characters to tell the tale. It is their story, I am just writing it.






                                share|improve this answer













                                If your characters are interchangeable, forgettable and one dimensional you will have trouble getting readers to read much of your book.



                                Readers meet a character and watch, waiting for something to happen. If we don’t care enough about the character because they are just a placeholder, we put the book down.



                                Plots happen to someone and if that someone is an undeveloped element and not a character, we don’t care.



                                I was reading a book set during the French Revolution - it had a strong plot and a few interesting characters, but others were rather flat. I read on because one character was a young nobleman with republican views who joined the revolution. The author killed off a lot of interesting characters, but I kept reading because this guy had a problem and I wanted to see how it was resolved. I cared about him. She killed him off too and I put the book down - no one left I cared to follow.



                                Memorable characters are either hard work to create or they come as inspiration. They fuel even the most plot driven story - they are the reason the reader turns the page.



                                My piece is a character driven thriller and before I started writing it, I spent weeks thinking about two characters (one is minor, yet pivotal). I had a clear plot and my characters and I started writing. My characters reached a point where they diverged from the plot, essentially telling me they had a better idea. They did and the book went in a direction I had not foreseen.



                                My point is, had I held to my original plot, forced it to play out as I had planned, I would have 80k words of a generic novel that I would probably not want to read - at least, not twice. Following my characters, I have a much longer work that I am proud of, enjoy reading, and is fun to write.



                                I have no idea how it will end, suspect I will slip the original plot in sometime in the future and trust my characters to tell the tale. It is their story, I am just writing it.







                                share|improve this answer












                                share|improve this answer



                                share|improve this answer










                                answered May 27 at 15:36









                                RasdashanRasdashan

                                10.9k1 gold badge16 silver badges68 bronze badges




                                10.9k1 gold badge16 silver badges68 bronze badges


























                                    0
















                                    No, characters aren't interchangeable. If they are, nobody wants to read it.



                                    The plot happens to the characters, and people read to identify with the characters, as people, and they develop feelings for them (good and bad). Even in a plot-heavy story line, like those used in the current series Elementary (last season airing now; a Sherlock spin), the crime and how it was done is the "plot", but almost unimportant: Fans like that the plot is usually very clever, but what they remember about episodes is how the relationships develop: Joan (Dr. Watson) is unhappy living in London, Sherlock is concerned, Marcus stages a private intervention with Captain Gregson over his treatment of Sherlock, Sherlock tries to address some of Joan's complaints about the DI, and the cliffhanger: Captain Gregson gets shot, and might not make it. Next mystery: Who shot Captain Gregson?



                                    Let's see, what was the crime in this episode? I forget, Sherlock solved it somehow. What we are watching is a man with an extraordinary skill that struggles with personal relationships but as a consequence of that values the few he does have all the more.



                                    I'll say it again: Plots happen to characters, and that is why people are reading the story. In Harry Potter, the magic setting is very clever, the plots are basic mystery, but we are really reading to see how those things affect Harry Potter, Hermione Granger and Ron Weasley (and a handful of others).



                                    If you treat your characters like objects or chess pieces, nobody will care about them. When they stop caring what happens next to your character they will put the book down. Because it doesn't matter what happens next in the plot, if they aren't rooting for anybody, and aren't frightened for them, or frightened of the villain, then it isn't going to change anything for anybody they care about.



                                    On the other hand, the more characters they DO care about, the less likely they are to put the book down.



                                    I often say here, what keeps readers turning pages is wondering what happens next. How the scene will work out, how the chapter will work out, and eventually how the Act or whole book will work out. But the biggest reason they want to know what happens next is because it will have an effect on the characters.



                                    You do have to have a plot, so something happens to the characters and readers can anticipate things happening to the characters. Complex and clever plots are entertaining; they keep the uncertainty of what happens next to the characters at a high level. Elaborate imaginative settings can be entertaining, they keep the reader wondering what they will see next, and often present fun problems for the characters to deal with.



                                    Without characters to care about, those elements are worthless.






                                    share|improve this answer






























                                      0
















                                      No, characters aren't interchangeable. If they are, nobody wants to read it.



                                      The plot happens to the characters, and people read to identify with the characters, as people, and they develop feelings for them (good and bad). Even in a plot-heavy story line, like those used in the current series Elementary (last season airing now; a Sherlock spin), the crime and how it was done is the "plot", but almost unimportant: Fans like that the plot is usually very clever, but what they remember about episodes is how the relationships develop: Joan (Dr. Watson) is unhappy living in London, Sherlock is concerned, Marcus stages a private intervention with Captain Gregson over his treatment of Sherlock, Sherlock tries to address some of Joan's complaints about the DI, and the cliffhanger: Captain Gregson gets shot, and might not make it. Next mystery: Who shot Captain Gregson?



                                      Let's see, what was the crime in this episode? I forget, Sherlock solved it somehow. What we are watching is a man with an extraordinary skill that struggles with personal relationships but as a consequence of that values the few he does have all the more.



                                      I'll say it again: Plots happen to characters, and that is why people are reading the story. In Harry Potter, the magic setting is very clever, the plots are basic mystery, but we are really reading to see how those things affect Harry Potter, Hermione Granger and Ron Weasley (and a handful of others).



                                      If you treat your characters like objects or chess pieces, nobody will care about them. When they stop caring what happens next to your character they will put the book down. Because it doesn't matter what happens next in the plot, if they aren't rooting for anybody, and aren't frightened for them, or frightened of the villain, then it isn't going to change anything for anybody they care about.



                                      On the other hand, the more characters they DO care about, the less likely they are to put the book down.



                                      I often say here, what keeps readers turning pages is wondering what happens next. How the scene will work out, how the chapter will work out, and eventually how the Act or whole book will work out. But the biggest reason they want to know what happens next is because it will have an effect on the characters.



                                      You do have to have a plot, so something happens to the characters and readers can anticipate things happening to the characters. Complex and clever plots are entertaining; they keep the uncertainty of what happens next to the characters at a high level. Elaborate imaginative settings can be entertaining, they keep the reader wondering what they will see next, and often present fun problems for the characters to deal with.



                                      Without characters to care about, those elements are worthless.






                                      share|improve this answer




























                                        0














                                        0










                                        0









                                        No, characters aren't interchangeable. If they are, nobody wants to read it.



                                        The plot happens to the characters, and people read to identify with the characters, as people, and they develop feelings for them (good and bad). Even in a plot-heavy story line, like those used in the current series Elementary (last season airing now; a Sherlock spin), the crime and how it was done is the "plot", but almost unimportant: Fans like that the plot is usually very clever, but what they remember about episodes is how the relationships develop: Joan (Dr. Watson) is unhappy living in London, Sherlock is concerned, Marcus stages a private intervention with Captain Gregson over his treatment of Sherlock, Sherlock tries to address some of Joan's complaints about the DI, and the cliffhanger: Captain Gregson gets shot, and might not make it. Next mystery: Who shot Captain Gregson?



                                        Let's see, what was the crime in this episode? I forget, Sherlock solved it somehow. What we are watching is a man with an extraordinary skill that struggles with personal relationships but as a consequence of that values the few he does have all the more.



                                        I'll say it again: Plots happen to characters, and that is why people are reading the story. In Harry Potter, the magic setting is very clever, the plots are basic mystery, but we are really reading to see how those things affect Harry Potter, Hermione Granger and Ron Weasley (and a handful of others).



                                        If you treat your characters like objects or chess pieces, nobody will care about them. When they stop caring what happens next to your character they will put the book down. Because it doesn't matter what happens next in the plot, if they aren't rooting for anybody, and aren't frightened for them, or frightened of the villain, then it isn't going to change anything for anybody they care about.



                                        On the other hand, the more characters they DO care about, the less likely they are to put the book down.



                                        I often say here, what keeps readers turning pages is wondering what happens next. How the scene will work out, how the chapter will work out, and eventually how the Act or whole book will work out. But the biggest reason they want to know what happens next is because it will have an effect on the characters.



                                        You do have to have a plot, so something happens to the characters and readers can anticipate things happening to the characters. Complex and clever plots are entertaining; they keep the uncertainty of what happens next to the characters at a high level. Elaborate imaginative settings can be entertaining, they keep the reader wondering what they will see next, and often present fun problems for the characters to deal with.



                                        Without characters to care about, those elements are worthless.






                                        share|improve this answer













                                        No, characters aren't interchangeable. If they are, nobody wants to read it.



                                        The plot happens to the characters, and people read to identify with the characters, as people, and they develop feelings for them (good and bad). Even in a plot-heavy story line, like those used in the current series Elementary (last season airing now; a Sherlock spin), the crime and how it was done is the "plot", but almost unimportant: Fans like that the plot is usually very clever, but what they remember about episodes is how the relationships develop: Joan (Dr. Watson) is unhappy living in London, Sherlock is concerned, Marcus stages a private intervention with Captain Gregson over his treatment of Sherlock, Sherlock tries to address some of Joan's complaints about the DI, and the cliffhanger: Captain Gregson gets shot, and might not make it. Next mystery: Who shot Captain Gregson?



                                        Let's see, what was the crime in this episode? I forget, Sherlock solved it somehow. What we are watching is a man with an extraordinary skill that struggles with personal relationships but as a consequence of that values the few he does have all the more.



                                        I'll say it again: Plots happen to characters, and that is why people are reading the story. In Harry Potter, the magic setting is very clever, the plots are basic mystery, but we are really reading to see how those things affect Harry Potter, Hermione Granger and Ron Weasley (and a handful of others).



                                        If you treat your characters like objects or chess pieces, nobody will care about them. When they stop caring what happens next to your character they will put the book down. Because it doesn't matter what happens next in the plot, if they aren't rooting for anybody, and aren't frightened for them, or frightened of the villain, then it isn't going to change anything for anybody they care about.



                                        On the other hand, the more characters they DO care about, the less likely they are to put the book down.



                                        I often say here, what keeps readers turning pages is wondering what happens next. How the scene will work out, how the chapter will work out, and eventually how the Act or whole book will work out. But the biggest reason they want to know what happens next is because it will have an effect on the characters.



                                        You do have to have a plot, so something happens to the characters and readers can anticipate things happening to the characters. Complex and clever plots are entertaining; they keep the uncertainty of what happens next to the characters at a high level. Elaborate imaginative settings can be entertaining, they keep the reader wondering what they will see next, and often present fun problems for the characters to deal with.



                                        Without characters to care about, those elements are worthless.







                                        share|improve this answer












                                        share|improve this answer



                                        share|improve this answer










                                        answered May 28 at 21:58









                                        AmadeusAmadeus

                                        76.8k7 gold badges103 silver badges250 bronze badges




                                        76.8k7 gold badges103 silver badges250 bronze badges


























                                            0
















                                            First. If you develop the characters first, the plot first or do them iteratively... or just start to write and then edit to make the characters work in the final version is completely a question of taste and writing style.



                                            You do not have to create the characters first.



                                            You should, however, as I will get into below, have well-developed characters, plot, and theme to make the story work.



                                            As has been mentioned in other answers, you use characters to create an emotional response in the reader and a connection with the story. However, there's more to it than that.



                                            If you don't utilize characters fully in your story you're losing half your set of tools to create conflict. You're also making it much harder to make the theme of your story work. In the worst case scenario, you risk making the whole thing limp.



                                            Inner conflict vs Outer conflict



                                            A story usually has two versions of conflict. The inner conflict, taking place in the head of the character, and the outer conflict taking place in the world outside the character.



                                            An important aspect of the inner conflict is about character development (a.k.a. change arcs). This development is usually about how the (main) character stops believing in the lie of the story and starts believing in the truth (positive change arc). Other versions exist; truth to lie (corruption change arc), lie to worse lie (fall arc), lie to depressing truth (disillusion arc).



                                            The outer conflict is, in short how the characters (protagonist, antagonist, and various sidekicks) try to make their lies and truths manifest in the physical world.



                                            The Flat Arc / Testing Arc



                                            Apart from the above versions of character development, there's also a version where the character defends their truth against a lie-ridden world. This is called a flat or testing arc.



                                            This type of character development is what you'll see in superhero stories, and may also be common in plot-driven stories. It may seem as if there is no character development, and there isn't... in the main character... but instead, it happens in other supporting characters around the main character.



                                            Character development is all about the character changing their relationship to the truth and the lie in the story, however, even a flat arc character can evolve, learn new skills, become more confident in their truth, or more skillful in using it, they just never exchange their truth for the lie. Not even when they are sure their truth is about as effective against the lie as a straw of grass against a tornado.



                                            Of course, just because the character doesn't change, doesn't mean they don't get a thorough beating in the story. They usually get to pay dearly for daring to believe in the truth. Sometimes even with their lives.



                                            Character, Plot, Theme



                                            The three elements character, plot, and theme are among the more important in a story.



                                            The theme can be described as the conflict between a truth and an opposing lie (or the conflict between a group of related truths and an opposing group of related lies—it can get more or less complex).



                                            The trick with the theme is to weave it into the story so skillfully the reader almost isn't consciously aware it's even there.



                                            There are many ways this can be done but in short, it's about showing, not telling the lies and truths. If your characters never utter them in dialog, great! Or at least not have a long monolog about them... Instead, make the reader understand what the characters believe by their actions.



                                            The theme connects to the characters by having the truths and lies cause character development.



                                            The inner conflict consists of the protagonistic and antagonistic characters being proponents of the truth and lie respectively.



                                            The outer conflict, the plot, is about these characters doing things to try to manifest their lies and truths in the outer world (i.e. shaping the world according to their beliefs). In doing so, they make the outer conflict a manifestation of the inner.



                                            Without this triangle of theme, character, and plot, the story is at risk of seeming limp, illogical and/or superficial. Not to mention that with less developed characters it will only contain half the amount of conflict you could otherwise pack into it.






                                            share|improve this answer






























                                              0
















                                              First. If you develop the characters first, the plot first or do them iteratively... or just start to write and then edit to make the characters work in the final version is completely a question of taste and writing style.



                                              You do not have to create the characters first.



                                              You should, however, as I will get into below, have well-developed characters, plot, and theme to make the story work.



                                              As has been mentioned in other answers, you use characters to create an emotional response in the reader and a connection with the story. However, there's more to it than that.



                                              If you don't utilize characters fully in your story you're losing half your set of tools to create conflict. You're also making it much harder to make the theme of your story work. In the worst case scenario, you risk making the whole thing limp.



                                              Inner conflict vs Outer conflict



                                              A story usually has two versions of conflict. The inner conflict, taking place in the head of the character, and the outer conflict taking place in the world outside the character.



                                              An important aspect of the inner conflict is about character development (a.k.a. change arcs). This development is usually about how the (main) character stops believing in the lie of the story and starts believing in the truth (positive change arc). Other versions exist; truth to lie (corruption change arc), lie to worse lie (fall arc), lie to depressing truth (disillusion arc).



                                              The outer conflict is, in short how the characters (protagonist, antagonist, and various sidekicks) try to make their lies and truths manifest in the physical world.



                                              The Flat Arc / Testing Arc



                                              Apart from the above versions of character development, there's also a version where the character defends their truth against a lie-ridden world. This is called a flat or testing arc.



                                              This type of character development is what you'll see in superhero stories, and may also be common in plot-driven stories. It may seem as if there is no character development, and there isn't... in the main character... but instead, it happens in other supporting characters around the main character.



                                              Character development is all about the character changing their relationship to the truth and the lie in the story, however, even a flat arc character can evolve, learn new skills, become more confident in their truth, or more skillful in using it, they just never exchange their truth for the lie. Not even when they are sure their truth is about as effective against the lie as a straw of grass against a tornado.



                                              Of course, just because the character doesn't change, doesn't mean they don't get a thorough beating in the story. They usually get to pay dearly for daring to believe in the truth. Sometimes even with their lives.



                                              Character, Plot, Theme



                                              The three elements character, plot, and theme are among the more important in a story.



                                              The theme can be described as the conflict between a truth and an opposing lie (or the conflict between a group of related truths and an opposing group of related lies—it can get more or less complex).



                                              The trick with the theme is to weave it into the story so skillfully the reader almost isn't consciously aware it's even there.



                                              There are many ways this can be done but in short, it's about showing, not telling the lies and truths. If your characters never utter them in dialog, great! Or at least not have a long monolog about them... Instead, make the reader understand what the characters believe by their actions.



                                              The theme connects to the characters by having the truths and lies cause character development.



                                              The inner conflict consists of the protagonistic and antagonistic characters being proponents of the truth and lie respectively.



                                              The outer conflict, the plot, is about these characters doing things to try to manifest their lies and truths in the outer world (i.e. shaping the world according to their beliefs). In doing so, they make the outer conflict a manifestation of the inner.



                                              Without this triangle of theme, character, and plot, the story is at risk of seeming limp, illogical and/or superficial. Not to mention that with less developed characters it will only contain half the amount of conflict you could otherwise pack into it.






                                              share|improve this answer




























                                                0














                                                0










                                                0









                                                First. If you develop the characters first, the plot first or do them iteratively... or just start to write and then edit to make the characters work in the final version is completely a question of taste and writing style.



                                                You do not have to create the characters first.



                                                You should, however, as I will get into below, have well-developed characters, plot, and theme to make the story work.



                                                As has been mentioned in other answers, you use characters to create an emotional response in the reader and a connection with the story. However, there's more to it than that.



                                                If you don't utilize characters fully in your story you're losing half your set of tools to create conflict. You're also making it much harder to make the theme of your story work. In the worst case scenario, you risk making the whole thing limp.



                                                Inner conflict vs Outer conflict



                                                A story usually has two versions of conflict. The inner conflict, taking place in the head of the character, and the outer conflict taking place in the world outside the character.



                                                An important aspect of the inner conflict is about character development (a.k.a. change arcs). This development is usually about how the (main) character stops believing in the lie of the story and starts believing in the truth (positive change arc). Other versions exist; truth to lie (corruption change arc), lie to worse lie (fall arc), lie to depressing truth (disillusion arc).



                                                The outer conflict is, in short how the characters (protagonist, antagonist, and various sidekicks) try to make their lies and truths manifest in the physical world.



                                                The Flat Arc / Testing Arc



                                                Apart from the above versions of character development, there's also a version where the character defends their truth against a lie-ridden world. This is called a flat or testing arc.



                                                This type of character development is what you'll see in superhero stories, and may also be common in plot-driven stories. It may seem as if there is no character development, and there isn't... in the main character... but instead, it happens in other supporting characters around the main character.



                                                Character development is all about the character changing their relationship to the truth and the lie in the story, however, even a flat arc character can evolve, learn new skills, become more confident in their truth, or more skillful in using it, they just never exchange their truth for the lie. Not even when they are sure their truth is about as effective against the lie as a straw of grass against a tornado.



                                                Of course, just because the character doesn't change, doesn't mean they don't get a thorough beating in the story. They usually get to pay dearly for daring to believe in the truth. Sometimes even with their lives.



                                                Character, Plot, Theme



                                                The three elements character, plot, and theme are among the more important in a story.



                                                The theme can be described as the conflict between a truth and an opposing lie (or the conflict between a group of related truths and an opposing group of related lies—it can get more or less complex).



                                                The trick with the theme is to weave it into the story so skillfully the reader almost isn't consciously aware it's even there.



                                                There are many ways this can be done but in short, it's about showing, not telling the lies and truths. If your characters never utter them in dialog, great! Or at least not have a long monolog about them... Instead, make the reader understand what the characters believe by their actions.



                                                The theme connects to the characters by having the truths and lies cause character development.



                                                The inner conflict consists of the protagonistic and antagonistic characters being proponents of the truth and lie respectively.



                                                The outer conflict, the plot, is about these characters doing things to try to manifest their lies and truths in the outer world (i.e. shaping the world according to their beliefs). In doing so, they make the outer conflict a manifestation of the inner.



                                                Without this triangle of theme, character, and plot, the story is at risk of seeming limp, illogical and/or superficial. Not to mention that with less developed characters it will only contain half the amount of conflict you could otherwise pack into it.






                                                share|improve this answer













                                                First. If you develop the characters first, the plot first or do them iteratively... or just start to write and then edit to make the characters work in the final version is completely a question of taste and writing style.



                                                You do not have to create the characters first.



                                                You should, however, as I will get into below, have well-developed characters, plot, and theme to make the story work.



                                                As has been mentioned in other answers, you use characters to create an emotional response in the reader and a connection with the story. However, there's more to it than that.



                                                If you don't utilize characters fully in your story you're losing half your set of tools to create conflict. You're also making it much harder to make the theme of your story work. In the worst case scenario, you risk making the whole thing limp.



                                                Inner conflict vs Outer conflict



                                                A story usually has two versions of conflict. The inner conflict, taking place in the head of the character, and the outer conflict taking place in the world outside the character.



                                                An important aspect of the inner conflict is about character development (a.k.a. change arcs). This development is usually about how the (main) character stops believing in the lie of the story and starts believing in the truth (positive change arc). Other versions exist; truth to lie (corruption change arc), lie to worse lie (fall arc), lie to depressing truth (disillusion arc).



                                                The outer conflict is, in short how the characters (protagonist, antagonist, and various sidekicks) try to make their lies and truths manifest in the physical world.



                                                The Flat Arc / Testing Arc



                                                Apart from the above versions of character development, there's also a version where the character defends their truth against a lie-ridden world. This is called a flat or testing arc.



                                                This type of character development is what you'll see in superhero stories, and may also be common in plot-driven stories. It may seem as if there is no character development, and there isn't... in the main character... but instead, it happens in other supporting characters around the main character.



                                                Character development is all about the character changing their relationship to the truth and the lie in the story, however, even a flat arc character can evolve, learn new skills, become more confident in their truth, or more skillful in using it, they just never exchange their truth for the lie. Not even when they are sure their truth is about as effective against the lie as a straw of grass against a tornado.



                                                Of course, just because the character doesn't change, doesn't mean they don't get a thorough beating in the story. They usually get to pay dearly for daring to believe in the truth. Sometimes even with their lives.



                                                Character, Plot, Theme



                                                The three elements character, plot, and theme are among the more important in a story.



                                                The theme can be described as the conflict between a truth and an opposing lie (or the conflict between a group of related truths and an opposing group of related lies—it can get more or less complex).



                                                The trick with the theme is to weave it into the story so skillfully the reader almost isn't consciously aware it's even there.



                                                There are many ways this can be done but in short, it's about showing, not telling the lies and truths. If your characters never utter them in dialog, great! Or at least not have a long monolog about them... Instead, make the reader understand what the characters believe by their actions.



                                                The theme connects to the characters by having the truths and lies cause character development.



                                                The inner conflict consists of the protagonistic and antagonistic characters being proponents of the truth and lie respectively.



                                                The outer conflict, the plot, is about these characters doing things to try to manifest their lies and truths in the outer world (i.e. shaping the world according to their beliefs). In doing so, they make the outer conflict a manifestation of the inner.



                                                Without this triangle of theme, character, and plot, the story is at risk of seeming limp, illogical and/or superficial. Not to mention that with less developed characters it will only contain half the amount of conflict you could otherwise pack into it.







                                                share|improve this answer












                                                share|improve this answer



                                                share|improve this answer










                                                answered May 29 at 0:52









                                                ErkErk

                                                1,6108 silver badges10 bronze badges




                                                1,6108 silver badges10 bronze badges


































                                                    draft saved

                                                    draft discarded



















































                                                    Thanks for contributing an answer to Writing Stack Exchange!


                                                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                                                    But avoid



                                                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                                                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                                                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                                                    draft saved


                                                    draft discarded














                                                    StackExchange.ready(
                                                    function () {
                                                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fwriting.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f45458%2fhow-is-character-development-a-major-role-in-the-plot-of-a-story%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                                                    }
                                                    );

                                                    Post as a guest















                                                    Required, but never shown





















































                                                    Required, but never shown














                                                    Required, but never shown












                                                    Required, but never shown







                                                    Required, but never shown

































                                                    Required, but never shown














                                                    Required, but never shown












                                                    Required, but never shown







                                                    Required, but never shown







                                                    Popular posts from this blog

                                                    Færeyskur hestur Heimild | Tengill | Tilvísanir | LeiðsagnarvalRossið - síða um færeyska hrossið á færeyskuGott ár hjá færeyska hestinum

                                                    He _____ here since 1970 . Answer needed [closed]What does “since he was so high” mean?Meaning of “catch birds for”?How do I ensure “since” takes the meaning I want?“Who cares here” meaningWhat does “right round toward” mean?the time tense (had now been detected)What does the phrase “ring around the roses” mean here?Correct usage of “visited upon”Meaning of “foiled rail sabotage bid”It was the third time I had gone to Rome or It is the third time I had been to Rome

                                                    Slayer Innehåll Historia | Stil, komposition och lyrik | Bandets betydelse och framgångar | Sidoprojekt och samarbeten | Kontroverser | Medlemmar | Utmärkelser och nomineringar | Turnéer och festivaler | Diskografi | Referenser | Externa länkar | Navigeringsmenywww.slayer.net”Metal Massacre vol. 1””Metal Massacre vol. 3””Metal Massacre Volume III””Show No Mercy””Haunting the Chapel””Live Undead””Hell Awaits””Reign in Blood””Reign in Blood””Gold & Platinum – Reign in Blood””Golden Gods Awards Winners”originalet”Kerrang! Hall Of Fame””Slayer Looks Back On 37-Year Career In New Video Series: Part Two””South of Heaven””Gold & Platinum – South of Heaven””Seasons in the Abyss””Gold & Platinum - Seasons in the Abyss””Divine Intervention””Divine Intervention - Release group by Slayer””Gold & Platinum - Divine Intervention””Live Intrusion””Undisputed Attitude””Abolish Government/Superficial Love””Release “Slatanic Slaughter: A Tribute to Slayer” by Various Artists””Diabolus in Musica””Soundtrack to the Apocalypse””God Hates Us All””Systematic - Relationships””War at the Warfield””Gold & Platinum - War at the Warfield””Soundtrack to the Apocalypse””Gold & Platinum - Still Reigning””Metallica, Slayer, Iron Mauden Among Winners At Metal Hammer Awards””Eternal Pyre””Eternal Pyre - Slayer release group””Eternal Pyre””Metal Storm Awards 2006””Kerrang! Hall Of Fame””Slayer Wins 'Best Metal' Grammy Award””Slayer Guitarist Jeff Hanneman Dies””Bullet-For My Valentine booed at Metal Hammer Golden Gods Awards””Unholy Aliance””The End Of Slayer?””Slayer: We Could Thrash Out Two More Albums If We're Fast Enough...””'The Unholy Alliance: Chapter III' UK Dates Added”originalet”Megadeth And Slayer To Co-Headline 'Canadian Carnage' Trek”originalet”World Painted Blood””Release “World Painted Blood” by Slayer””Metallica Heading To Cinemas””Slayer, Megadeth To Join Forces For 'European Carnage' Tour - Dec. 18, 2010”originalet”Slayer's Hanneman Contracts Acute Infection; Band To Bring In Guest Guitarist””Cannibal Corpse's Pat O'Brien Will Step In As Slayer's Guest Guitarist”originalet”Slayer’s Jeff Hanneman Dead at 49””Dave Lombardo Says He Made Only $67,000 In 2011 While Touring With Slayer””Slayer: We Do Not Agree With Dave Lombardo's Substance Or Timeline Of Events””Slayer Welcomes Drummer Paul Bostaph Back To The Fold””Slayer Hope to Unveil Never-Before-Heard Jeff Hanneman Material on Next Album””Slayer Debut New Song 'Implode' During Surprise Golden Gods Appearance””Release group Repentless by Slayer””Repentless - Slayer - Credits””Slayer””Metal Storm Awards 2015””Slayer - to release comic book "Repentless #1"””Slayer To Release 'Repentless' 6.66" Vinyl Box Set””BREAKING NEWS: Slayer Announce Farewell Tour””Slayer Recruit Lamb of God, Anthrax, Behemoth + Testament for Final Tour””Slayer lägger ner efter 37 år””Slayer Announces Second North American Leg Of 'Final' Tour””Final World Tour””Slayer Announces Final European Tour With Lamb of God, Anthrax And Obituary””Slayer To Tour Europe With Lamb of God, Anthrax And Obituary””Slayer To Play 'Last French Show Ever' At Next Year's Hellfst””Slayer's Final World Tour Will Extend Into 2019””Death Angel's Rob Cavestany On Slayer's 'Farewell' Tour: 'Some Of Us Could See This Coming'””Testament Has No Plans To Retire Anytime Soon, Says Chuck Billy””Anthrax's Scott Ian On Slayer's 'Farewell' Tour Plans: 'I Was Surprised And I Wasn't Surprised'””Slayer””Slayer's Morbid Schlock””Review/Rock; For Slayer, the Mania Is the Message””Slayer - Biography””Slayer - Reign In Blood”originalet”Dave Lombardo””An exclusive oral history of Slayer”originalet”Exclusive! Interview With Slayer Guitarist Jeff Hanneman”originalet”Thinking Out Loud: Slayer's Kerry King on hair metal, Satan and being polite””Slayer Lyrics””Slayer - Biography””Most influential artists for extreme metal music””Slayer - Reign in Blood””Slayer guitarist Jeff Hanneman dies aged 49””Slatanic Slaughter: A Tribute to Slayer””Gateway to Hell: A Tribute to Slayer””Covered In Blood””Slayer: The Origins of Thrash in San Francisco, CA.””Why They Rule - #6 Slayer”originalet”Guitar World's 100 Greatest Heavy Metal Guitarists Of All Time”originalet”The fans have spoken: Slayer comes out on top in readers' polls”originalet”Tribute to Jeff Hanneman (1964-2013)””Lamb Of God Frontman: We Sound Like A Slayer Rip-Off””BEHEMOTH Frontman Pays Tribute To SLAYER's JEFF HANNEMAN””Slayer, Hatebreed Doing Double Duty On This Year's Ozzfest””System of a Down””Lacuna Coil’s Andrea Ferro Talks Influences, Skateboarding, Band Origins + More””Slayer - Reign in Blood””Into The Lungs of Hell””Slayer rules - en utställning om fans””Slayer and Their Fans Slashed Through a No-Holds-Barred Night at Gas Monkey””Home””Slayer””Gold & Platinum - The Big 4 Live from Sofia, Bulgaria””Exclusive! Interview With Slayer Guitarist Kerry King””2008-02-23: Wiltern, Los Angeles, CA, USA””Slayer's Kerry King To Perform With Megadeth Tonight! - Oct. 21, 2010”originalet”Dave Lombardo - Biography”Slayer Case DismissedArkiveradUltimate Classic Rock: Slayer guitarist Jeff Hanneman dead at 49.”Slayer: "We could never do any thing like Some Kind Of Monster..."””Cannibal Corpse'S Pat O'Brien Will Step In As Slayer'S Guest Guitarist | The Official Slayer Site”originalet”Slayer Wins 'Best Metal' Grammy Award””Slayer Guitarist Jeff Hanneman Dies””Kerrang! Awards 2006 Blog: Kerrang! Hall Of Fame””Kerrang! Awards 2013: Kerrang! Legend”originalet”Metallica, Slayer, Iron Maien Among Winners At Metal Hammer Awards””Metal Hammer Golden Gods Awards””Bullet For My Valentine Booed At Metal Hammer Golden Gods Awards””Metal Storm Awards 2006””Metal Storm Awards 2015””Slayer's Concert History””Slayer - Relationships””Slayer - Releases”Slayers officiella webbplatsSlayer på MusicBrainzOfficiell webbplatsSlayerSlayerr1373445760000 0001 1540 47353068615-5086262726cb13906545x(data)6033143kn20030215029