Circumcircle bisects the segment connecting the vertices of two regular even-sided polygons





.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty{
margin-bottom:0;
}
.everyonelovesstackoverflow{position:absolute;height:1px;width:1px;opacity:0;top:0;left:0;pointer-events:none;}








4












$begingroup$


For any two unequal even-sided regular polygons, the circumcircle around them bisects the segment connecting the vertices of the two polygons.



Here are some images illustrating the question:
enter image description hereenter image description hereenter image description here
For any two even-sided regular polygons with equal number of sides, I observed that the following relationship always hold:




$$CO=C_1O$$




Just for clarification, we can construct a circle with three points. In the above cases, the three circumcircles are formed by three-point pairs $(D,A,D_1),~(E,F,E_1,),~(F,G,F_1)$ respectively. Point $O$ is where the circumcircle intercepts the segment connecting the vertices of the polygons.
I have stumbled on this problem for a while, and couldn't figure out how to prove it. Any hints would be appreciated.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$










  • 2




    $begingroup$
    By messing around with your problem, it seems that in order for your relation to be true, you must assume the polygons are not only even-sided, but also regular. It then reduces to a relation among circles: you can replace the polygons with circles.
    $endgroup$
    – Robin Carlier
    May 27 at 12:36




















4












$begingroup$


For any two unequal even-sided regular polygons, the circumcircle around them bisects the segment connecting the vertices of the two polygons.



Here are some images illustrating the question:
enter image description hereenter image description hereenter image description here
For any two even-sided regular polygons with equal number of sides, I observed that the following relationship always hold:




$$CO=C_1O$$




Just for clarification, we can construct a circle with three points. In the above cases, the three circumcircles are formed by three-point pairs $(D,A,D_1),~(E,F,E_1,),~(F,G,F_1)$ respectively. Point $O$ is where the circumcircle intercepts the segment connecting the vertices of the polygons.
I have stumbled on this problem for a while, and couldn't figure out how to prove it. Any hints would be appreciated.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$










  • 2




    $begingroup$
    By messing around with your problem, it seems that in order for your relation to be true, you must assume the polygons are not only even-sided, but also regular. It then reduces to a relation among circles: you can replace the polygons with circles.
    $endgroup$
    – Robin Carlier
    May 27 at 12:36
















4












4








4


3



$begingroup$


For any two unequal even-sided regular polygons, the circumcircle around them bisects the segment connecting the vertices of the two polygons.



Here are some images illustrating the question:
enter image description hereenter image description hereenter image description here
For any two even-sided regular polygons with equal number of sides, I observed that the following relationship always hold:




$$CO=C_1O$$




Just for clarification, we can construct a circle with three points. In the above cases, the three circumcircles are formed by three-point pairs $(D,A,D_1),~(E,F,E_1,),~(F,G,F_1)$ respectively. Point $O$ is where the circumcircle intercepts the segment connecting the vertices of the polygons.
I have stumbled on this problem for a while, and couldn't figure out how to prove it. Any hints would be appreciated.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$




For any two unequal even-sided regular polygons, the circumcircle around them bisects the segment connecting the vertices of the two polygons.



Here are some images illustrating the question:
enter image description hereenter image description hereenter image description here
For any two even-sided regular polygons with equal number of sides, I observed that the following relationship always hold:




$$CO=C_1O$$




Just for clarification, we can construct a circle with three points. In the above cases, the three circumcircles are formed by three-point pairs $(D,A,D_1),~(E,F,E_1,),~(F,G,F_1)$ respectively. Point $O$ is where the circumcircle intercepts the segment connecting the vertices of the polygons.
I have stumbled on this problem for a while, and couldn't figure out how to prove it. Any hints would be appreciated.







geometry






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited May 27 at 14:33









Somos

18k1 gold badge15 silver badges40 bronze badges




18k1 gold badge15 silver badges40 bronze badges










asked May 27 at 11:03









LarryLarry

2,8404 gold badges12 silver badges33 bronze badges




2,8404 gold badges12 silver badges33 bronze badges











  • 2




    $begingroup$
    By messing around with your problem, it seems that in order for your relation to be true, you must assume the polygons are not only even-sided, but also regular. It then reduces to a relation among circles: you can replace the polygons with circles.
    $endgroup$
    – Robin Carlier
    May 27 at 12:36
















  • 2




    $begingroup$
    By messing around with your problem, it seems that in order for your relation to be true, you must assume the polygons are not only even-sided, but also regular. It then reduces to a relation among circles: you can replace the polygons with circles.
    $endgroup$
    – Robin Carlier
    May 27 at 12:36










2




2




$begingroup$
By messing around with your problem, it seems that in order for your relation to be true, you must assume the polygons are not only even-sided, but also regular. It then reduces to a relation among circles: you can replace the polygons with circles.
$endgroup$
– Robin Carlier
May 27 at 12:36






$begingroup$
By messing around with your problem, it seems that in order for your relation to be true, you must assume the polygons are not only even-sided, but also regular. It then reduces to a relation among circles: you can replace the polygons with circles.
$endgroup$
– Robin Carlier
May 27 at 12:36












3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes


















2














$begingroup$

As I said in my comment, you can replace your polygons by circles. The picture is then as following:enter image description here



You have two circles, tangent to each other at some point $T$, and two points (here, $P_1$ and $P_2$), one on each circle, such that the angle $widehat{TC_1P_1}$ and $widehat{TC_2P_2}$ are equal.



It is known that the center of the circle going through $T$, $P_1$ and $P_2$ is the
intersection of the perpendicular bissecors of $TP_1$ and $TP_2$, call this intersection I.



If one continues the lines $C_1P_1$ and $C_2P_2$ untill they intersect, it forms an isoceles triangle. Since the perpendicular bissectors or $TP_1$ and $TP_2$ are also the bissectors of the angles $widehat{TC_1P_1}$ and $widehat{TC_2P_2}$, the line going from the third vertex to $I$ happens to be the perpendicular bissector of $C_1C_2$. Hence since $C_1C_2$ is perpendicular to this diameter of the circle, $M$ must be the symetric of $T$ by the axis of this bissector.



Now it only remains to show that, with this information, $AM = MB$. Let's call U the middle of $C_1C_2$. Since $MU = UT$, $C_1U = UC_2$ becomes $C_1M + MU = UT + TC_2$, one can add the length of $AC_1$ on both side to get $AC_1 + C_1M + MU = UT + TC_2 + AC_1$. But $AC_1 = C_1T$ by definition of $C_1$, so $AC_1 + C_1M + MU = UT + TC_2 + C_1T$, which simplifies to $AM + MU = UT + C_1C_2$, and since $MU = UT$, to $AM = C_1C_2$, similarly, one can show that $MB = C_1C_2$. Hence $AM = MB$ as was to be shown.






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$























    2














    $begingroup$

    This question can be answered by using the elementary complex cross-ratio. We are given a positive integer $n>1$ and define the $n$-th root of unity $z := e^{2pi i/n}$. Suppose we have two externally tangent circles in the complex plane. Without loss of generality, using rigid motions, the first circle is centered at the origin $P_0 := 0$ with radius $r_1$. The point of tangency being $P_1 := P_0 + r_1.$ The second circle is centered at $P_5 := P_1 + r_2$. Define the points $P_2 := P_0 + r_1 z$ on the 1st circle rotated clockwise from point $P_1$ and $P_3 := P_5 - r_2/z$ on the 2nd circle rotated counterclockwise from point $P_1$. Define
    $P_4 := ((P_0-r_1) + (P_5+r_2))/2 = P_0 + r_2$ as the center of the circumcircle of the two tangent circles. This is labeled as $O$ in the diagrams.



    The question is how to prove that the four points $P_1,P_2,P_3,P_4$ are concyclic. The answer is this is true if and only if their cross-ratio is real. Check that the cross ratio simplifies as
    $$ frac{(P_1-P_3)(P_2-P_4)}{(P_2-P_3)(P_1-P_4)} =
    frac{(r_2-r_2/z)(r_1 z-r_2)}{(r_1(z-1)-r_2(1-1/z))(r_1-r_2)} =
    frac{-r_2}{r_1-r_2} $$

    which proves the result. Notice that we did not need to use that $n$ is even and if $n=2$ then the four points are collinear. If $r_1=r_2$ then the result is still true since $P_1=P_4$ in that case so we have only three different points and any three non-collinear points are concyclic.






    share|cite|improve this answer











    $endgroup$























      1














      $begingroup$

      Here is a slightly more general setting:




      Let $O_1,O_2$ be two points. Choose $C$ on the segment $O_1O_2$. The circles centered in $O_1,O_2$ through $C$ intersect the line $O_1O_2$ in ($C$ and) the (other) points $A_1$, and respectively $A_2$. Consider now from $A_1, A_2$ two rays in the same half plane w.r.t. $O_1O_2$ making the same angle with $O_1O_2$. Let $B_1,B_2$ be the intersection of the rays with the circles $(O_1)$, respectively $(O_2)$.



      3241370



      Then the points $C,B_1,B_2$ and the middle of the segment $A_1A_2$ are conciclic.




      In the picture there is also a quick possible proof.



      The center of the circle $(B_1CB_2)$, denoted by $M$, lies on the side bisectors of $B_1C$, respectively $B_2C$, being thus determined as their intersection. The centers $O_1$, respectively $O_2$ lie on them, and the triangle $MO_1O_2$ is isosceles, $MO_1=MO_2$, because of the base angles.



      The perpendicular in $M$ on $O_1O_2$ is thus the mid point of the segment $O_1O_2$. Let $C^*$ be the symmetric of $C$ w.r.t. this perpendicular. Then $C^*$ is also on the circle $(B_1CB_2)$ centered in $M$, since $MC=MC^*$. It remains to observe that $C^*$ is the mid point of $A_1A_2$.



      $square$






      share|cite|improve this answer









      $endgroup$

















        Your Answer








        StackExchange.ready(function() {
        var channelOptions = {
        tags: "".split(" "),
        id: "69"
        };
        initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

        StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
        // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
        if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
        StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
        createEditor();
        });
        }
        else {
        createEditor();
        }
        });

        function createEditor() {
        StackExchange.prepareEditor({
        heartbeatType: 'answer',
        autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
        convertImagesToLinks: true,
        noModals: true,
        showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
        reputationToPostImages: 10,
        bindNavPrevention: true,
        postfix: "",
        imageUploader: {
        brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
        contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/"u003ecc by-sa 4.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
        allowUrls: true
        },
        noCode: true, onDemand: true,
        discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
        ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
        });


        }
        });















        draft saved

        draft discarded
















        StackExchange.ready(
        function () {
        StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3241370%2fcircumcircle-bisects-the-segment-connecting-the-vertices-of-two-regular-even-sid%23new-answer', 'question_page');
        }
        );

        Post as a guest















        Required, but never shown

























        3 Answers
        3






        active

        oldest

        votes








        3 Answers
        3






        active

        oldest

        votes









        active

        oldest

        votes






        active

        oldest

        votes









        2














        $begingroup$

        As I said in my comment, you can replace your polygons by circles. The picture is then as following:enter image description here



        You have two circles, tangent to each other at some point $T$, and two points (here, $P_1$ and $P_2$), one on each circle, such that the angle $widehat{TC_1P_1}$ and $widehat{TC_2P_2}$ are equal.



        It is known that the center of the circle going through $T$, $P_1$ and $P_2$ is the
        intersection of the perpendicular bissecors of $TP_1$ and $TP_2$, call this intersection I.



        If one continues the lines $C_1P_1$ and $C_2P_2$ untill they intersect, it forms an isoceles triangle. Since the perpendicular bissectors or $TP_1$ and $TP_2$ are also the bissectors of the angles $widehat{TC_1P_1}$ and $widehat{TC_2P_2}$, the line going from the third vertex to $I$ happens to be the perpendicular bissector of $C_1C_2$. Hence since $C_1C_2$ is perpendicular to this diameter of the circle, $M$ must be the symetric of $T$ by the axis of this bissector.



        Now it only remains to show that, with this information, $AM = MB$. Let's call U the middle of $C_1C_2$. Since $MU = UT$, $C_1U = UC_2$ becomes $C_1M + MU = UT + TC_2$, one can add the length of $AC_1$ on both side to get $AC_1 + C_1M + MU = UT + TC_2 + AC_1$. But $AC_1 = C_1T$ by definition of $C_1$, so $AC_1 + C_1M + MU = UT + TC_2 + C_1T$, which simplifies to $AM + MU = UT + C_1C_2$, and since $MU = UT$, to $AM = C_1C_2$, similarly, one can show that $MB = C_1C_2$. Hence $AM = MB$ as was to be shown.






        share|cite|improve this answer











        $endgroup$




















          2














          $begingroup$

          As I said in my comment, you can replace your polygons by circles. The picture is then as following:enter image description here



          You have two circles, tangent to each other at some point $T$, and two points (here, $P_1$ and $P_2$), one on each circle, such that the angle $widehat{TC_1P_1}$ and $widehat{TC_2P_2}$ are equal.



          It is known that the center of the circle going through $T$, $P_1$ and $P_2$ is the
          intersection of the perpendicular bissecors of $TP_1$ and $TP_2$, call this intersection I.



          If one continues the lines $C_1P_1$ and $C_2P_2$ untill they intersect, it forms an isoceles triangle. Since the perpendicular bissectors or $TP_1$ and $TP_2$ are also the bissectors of the angles $widehat{TC_1P_1}$ and $widehat{TC_2P_2}$, the line going from the third vertex to $I$ happens to be the perpendicular bissector of $C_1C_2$. Hence since $C_1C_2$ is perpendicular to this diameter of the circle, $M$ must be the symetric of $T$ by the axis of this bissector.



          Now it only remains to show that, with this information, $AM = MB$. Let's call U the middle of $C_1C_2$. Since $MU = UT$, $C_1U = UC_2$ becomes $C_1M + MU = UT + TC_2$, one can add the length of $AC_1$ on both side to get $AC_1 + C_1M + MU = UT + TC_2 + AC_1$. But $AC_1 = C_1T$ by definition of $C_1$, so $AC_1 + C_1M + MU = UT + TC_2 + C_1T$, which simplifies to $AM + MU = UT + C_1C_2$, and since $MU = UT$, to $AM = C_1C_2$, similarly, one can show that $MB = C_1C_2$. Hence $AM = MB$ as was to be shown.






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$


















            2














            2










            2







            $begingroup$

            As I said in my comment, you can replace your polygons by circles. The picture is then as following:enter image description here



            You have two circles, tangent to each other at some point $T$, and two points (here, $P_1$ and $P_2$), one on each circle, such that the angle $widehat{TC_1P_1}$ and $widehat{TC_2P_2}$ are equal.



            It is known that the center of the circle going through $T$, $P_1$ and $P_2$ is the
            intersection of the perpendicular bissecors of $TP_1$ and $TP_2$, call this intersection I.



            If one continues the lines $C_1P_1$ and $C_2P_2$ untill they intersect, it forms an isoceles triangle. Since the perpendicular bissectors or $TP_1$ and $TP_2$ are also the bissectors of the angles $widehat{TC_1P_1}$ and $widehat{TC_2P_2}$, the line going from the third vertex to $I$ happens to be the perpendicular bissector of $C_1C_2$. Hence since $C_1C_2$ is perpendicular to this diameter of the circle, $M$ must be the symetric of $T$ by the axis of this bissector.



            Now it only remains to show that, with this information, $AM = MB$. Let's call U the middle of $C_1C_2$. Since $MU = UT$, $C_1U = UC_2$ becomes $C_1M + MU = UT + TC_2$, one can add the length of $AC_1$ on both side to get $AC_1 + C_1M + MU = UT + TC_2 + AC_1$. But $AC_1 = C_1T$ by definition of $C_1$, so $AC_1 + C_1M + MU = UT + TC_2 + C_1T$, which simplifies to $AM + MU = UT + C_1C_2$, and since $MU = UT$, to $AM = C_1C_2$, similarly, one can show that $MB = C_1C_2$. Hence $AM = MB$ as was to be shown.






            share|cite|improve this answer











            $endgroup$



            As I said in my comment, you can replace your polygons by circles. The picture is then as following:enter image description here



            You have two circles, tangent to each other at some point $T$, and two points (here, $P_1$ and $P_2$), one on each circle, such that the angle $widehat{TC_1P_1}$ and $widehat{TC_2P_2}$ are equal.



            It is known that the center of the circle going through $T$, $P_1$ and $P_2$ is the
            intersection of the perpendicular bissecors of $TP_1$ and $TP_2$, call this intersection I.



            If one continues the lines $C_1P_1$ and $C_2P_2$ untill they intersect, it forms an isoceles triangle. Since the perpendicular bissectors or $TP_1$ and $TP_2$ are also the bissectors of the angles $widehat{TC_1P_1}$ and $widehat{TC_2P_2}$, the line going from the third vertex to $I$ happens to be the perpendicular bissector of $C_1C_2$. Hence since $C_1C_2$ is perpendicular to this diameter of the circle, $M$ must be the symetric of $T$ by the axis of this bissector.



            Now it only remains to show that, with this information, $AM = MB$. Let's call U the middle of $C_1C_2$. Since $MU = UT$, $C_1U = UC_2$ becomes $C_1M + MU = UT + TC_2$, one can add the length of $AC_1$ on both side to get $AC_1 + C_1M + MU = UT + TC_2 + AC_1$. But $AC_1 = C_1T$ by definition of $C_1$, so $AC_1 + C_1M + MU = UT + TC_2 + C_1T$, which simplifies to $AM + MU = UT + C_1C_2$, and since $MU = UT$, to $AM = C_1C_2$, similarly, one can show that $MB = C_1C_2$. Hence $AM = MB$ as was to be shown.







            share|cite|improve this answer














            share|cite|improve this answer



            share|cite|improve this answer








            edited May 27 at 15:53

























            answered May 27 at 13:36









            Robin CarlierRobin Carlier

            4292 silver badges12 bronze badges




            4292 silver badges12 bronze badges




























                2














                $begingroup$

                This question can be answered by using the elementary complex cross-ratio. We are given a positive integer $n>1$ and define the $n$-th root of unity $z := e^{2pi i/n}$. Suppose we have two externally tangent circles in the complex plane. Without loss of generality, using rigid motions, the first circle is centered at the origin $P_0 := 0$ with radius $r_1$. The point of tangency being $P_1 := P_0 + r_1.$ The second circle is centered at $P_5 := P_1 + r_2$. Define the points $P_2 := P_0 + r_1 z$ on the 1st circle rotated clockwise from point $P_1$ and $P_3 := P_5 - r_2/z$ on the 2nd circle rotated counterclockwise from point $P_1$. Define
                $P_4 := ((P_0-r_1) + (P_5+r_2))/2 = P_0 + r_2$ as the center of the circumcircle of the two tangent circles. This is labeled as $O$ in the diagrams.



                The question is how to prove that the four points $P_1,P_2,P_3,P_4$ are concyclic. The answer is this is true if and only if their cross-ratio is real. Check that the cross ratio simplifies as
                $$ frac{(P_1-P_3)(P_2-P_4)}{(P_2-P_3)(P_1-P_4)} =
                frac{(r_2-r_2/z)(r_1 z-r_2)}{(r_1(z-1)-r_2(1-1/z))(r_1-r_2)} =
                frac{-r_2}{r_1-r_2} $$

                which proves the result. Notice that we did not need to use that $n$ is even and if $n=2$ then the four points are collinear. If $r_1=r_2$ then the result is still true since $P_1=P_4$ in that case so we have only three different points and any three non-collinear points are concyclic.






                share|cite|improve this answer











                $endgroup$




















                  2














                  $begingroup$

                  This question can be answered by using the elementary complex cross-ratio. We are given a positive integer $n>1$ and define the $n$-th root of unity $z := e^{2pi i/n}$. Suppose we have two externally tangent circles in the complex plane. Without loss of generality, using rigid motions, the first circle is centered at the origin $P_0 := 0$ with radius $r_1$. The point of tangency being $P_1 := P_0 + r_1.$ The second circle is centered at $P_5 := P_1 + r_2$. Define the points $P_2 := P_0 + r_1 z$ on the 1st circle rotated clockwise from point $P_1$ and $P_3 := P_5 - r_2/z$ on the 2nd circle rotated counterclockwise from point $P_1$. Define
                  $P_4 := ((P_0-r_1) + (P_5+r_2))/2 = P_0 + r_2$ as the center of the circumcircle of the two tangent circles. This is labeled as $O$ in the diagrams.



                  The question is how to prove that the four points $P_1,P_2,P_3,P_4$ are concyclic. The answer is this is true if and only if their cross-ratio is real. Check that the cross ratio simplifies as
                  $$ frac{(P_1-P_3)(P_2-P_4)}{(P_2-P_3)(P_1-P_4)} =
                  frac{(r_2-r_2/z)(r_1 z-r_2)}{(r_1(z-1)-r_2(1-1/z))(r_1-r_2)} =
                  frac{-r_2}{r_1-r_2} $$

                  which proves the result. Notice that we did not need to use that $n$ is even and if $n=2$ then the four points are collinear. If $r_1=r_2$ then the result is still true since $P_1=P_4$ in that case so we have only three different points and any three non-collinear points are concyclic.






                  share|cite|improve this answer











                  $endgroup$


















                    2














                    2










                    2







                    $begingroup$

                    This question can be answered by using the elementary complex cross-ratio. We are given a positive integer $n>1$ and define the $n$-th root of unity $z := e^{2pi i/n}$. Suppose we have two externally tangent circles in the complex plane. Without loss of generality, using rigid motions, the first circle is centered at the origin $P_0 := 0$ with radius $r_1$. The point of tangency being $P_1 := P_0 + r_1.$ The second circle is centered at $P_5 := P_1 + r_2$. Define the points $P_2 := P_0 + r_1 z$ on the 1st circle rotated clockwise from point $P_1$ and $P_3 := P_5 - r_2/z$ on the 2nd circle rotated counterclockwise from point $P_1$. Define
                    $P_4 := ((P_0-r_1) + (P_5+r_2))/2 = P_0 + r_2$ as the center of the circumcircle of the two tangent circles. This is labeled as $O$ in the diagrams.



                    The question is how to prove that the four points $P_1,P_2,P_3,P_4$ are concyclic. The answer is this is true if and only if their cross-ratio is real. Check that the cross ratio simplifies as
                    $$ frac{(P_1-P_3)(P_2-P_4)}{(P_2-P_3)(P_1-P_4)} =
                    frac{(r_2-r_2/z)(r_1 z-r_2)}{(r_1(z-1)-r_2(1-1/z))(r_1-r_2)} =
                    frac{-r_2}{r_1-r_2} $$

                    which proves the result. Notice that we did not need to use that $n$ is even and if $n=2$ then the four points are collinear. If $r_1=r_2$ then the result is still true since $P_1=P_4$ in that case so we have only three different points and any three non-collinear points are concyclic.






                    share|cite|improve this answer











                    $endgroup$



                    This question can be answered by using the elementary complex cross-ratio. We are given a positive integer $n>1$ and define the $n$-th root of unity $z := e^{2pi i/n}$. Suppose we have two externally tangent circles in the complex plane. Without loss of generality, using rigid motions, the first circle is centered at the origin $P_0 := 0$ with radius $r_1$. The point of tangency being $P_1 := P_0 + r_1.$ The second circle is centered at $P_5 := P_1 + r_2$. Define the points $P_2 := P_0 + r_1 z$ on the 1st circle rotated clockwise from point $P_1$ and $P_3 := P_5 - r_2/z$ on the 2nd circle rotated counterclockwise from point $P_1$. Define
                    $P_4 := ((P_0-r_1) + (P_5+r_2))/2 = P_0 + r_2$ as the center of the circumcircle of the two tangent circles. This is labeled as $O$ in the diagrams.



                    The question is how to prove that the four points $P_1,P_2,P_3,P_4$ are concyclic. The answer is this is true if and only if their cross-ratio is real. Check that the cross ratio simplifies as
                    $$ frac{(P_1-P_3)(P_2-P_4)}{(P_2-P_3)(P_1-P_4)} =
                    frac{(r_2-r_2/z)(r_1 z-r_2)}{(r_1(z-1)-r_2(1-1/z))(r_1-r_2)} =
                    frac{-r_2}{r_1-r_2} $$

                    which proves the result. Notice that we did not need to use that $n$ is even and if $n=2$ then the four points are collinear. If $r_1=r_2$ then the result is still true since $P_1=P_4$ in that case so we have only three different points and any three non-collinear points are concyclic.







                    share|cite|improve this answer














                    share|cite|improve this answer



                    share|cite|improve this answer








                    edited May 27 at 14:36

























                    answered May 27 at 13:38









                    SomosSomos

                    18k1 gold badge15 silver badges40 bronze badges




                    18k1 gold badge15 silver badges40 bronze badges


























                        1














                        $begingroup$

                        Here is a slightly more general setting:




                        Let $O_1,O_2$ be two points. Choose $C$ on the segment $O_1O_2$. The circles centered in $O_1,O_2$ through $C$ intersect the line $O_1O_2$ in ($C$ and) the (other) points $A_1$, and respectively $A_2$. Consider now from $A_1, A_2$ two rays in the same half plane w.r.t. $O_1O_2$ making the same angle with $O_1O_2$. Let $B_1,B_2$ be the intersection of the rays with the circles $(O_1)$, respectively $(O_2)$.



                        3241370



                        Then the points $C,B_1,B_2$ and the middle of the segment $A_1A_2$ are conciclic.




                        In the picture there is also a quick possible proof.



                        The center of the circle $(B_1CB_2)$, denoted by $M$, lies on the side bisectors of $B_1C$, respectively $B_2C$, being thus determined as their intersection. The centers $O_1$, respectively $O_2$ lie on them, and the triangle $MO_1O_2$ is isosceles, $MO_1=MO_2$, because of the base angles.



                        The perpendicular in $M$ on $O_1O_2$ is thus the mid point of the segment $O_1O_2$. Let $C^*$ be the symmetric of $C$ w.r.t. this perpendicular. Then $C^*$ is also on the circle $(B_1CB_2)$ centered in $M$, since $MC=MC^*$. It remains to observe that $C^*$ is the mid point of $A_1A_2$.



                        $square$






                        share|cite|improve this answer









                        $endgroup$




















                          1














                          $begingroup$

                          Here is a slightly more general setting:




                          Let $O_1,O_2$ be two points. Choose $C$ on the segment $O_1O_2$. The circles centered in $O_1,O_2$ through $C$ intersect the line $O_1O_2$ in ($C$ and) the (other) points $A_1$, and respectively $A_2$. Consider now from $A_1, A_2$ two rays in the same half plane w.r.t. $O_1O_2$ making the same angle with $O_1O_2$. Let $B_1,B_2$ be the intersection of the rays with the circles $(O_1)$, respectively $(O_2)$.



                          3241370



                          Then the points $C,B_1,B_2$ and the middle of the segment $A_1A_2$ are conciclic.




                          In the picture there is also a quick possible proof.



                          The center of the circle $(B_1CB_2)$, denoted by $M$, lies on the side bisectors of $B_1C$, respectively $B_2C$, being thus determined as their intersection. The centers $O_1$, respectively $O_2$ lie on them, and the triangle $MO_1O_2$ is isosceles, $MO_1=MO_2$, because of the base angles.



                          The perpendicular in $M$ on $O_1O_2$ is thus the mid point of the segment $O_1O_2$. Let $C^*$ be the symmetric of $C$ w.r.t. this perpendicular. Then $C^*$ is also on the circle $(B_1CB_2)$ centered in $M$, since $MC=MC^*$. It remains to observe that $C^*$ is the mid point of $A_1A_2$.



                          $square$






                          share|cite|improve this answer









                          $endgroup$


















                            1














                            1










                            1







                            $begingroup$

                            Here is a slightly more general setting:




                            Let $O_1,O_2$ be two points. Choose $C$ on the segment $O_1O_2$. The circles centered in $O_1,O_2$ through $C$ intersect the line $O_1O_2$ in ($C$ and) the (other) points $A_1$, and respectively $A_2$. Consider now from $A_1, A_2$ two rays in the same half plane w.r.t. $O_1O_2$ making the same angle with $O_1O_2$. Let $B_1,B_2$ be the intersection of the rays with the circles $(O_1)$, respectively $(O_2)$.



                            3241370



                            Then the points $C,B_1,B_2$ and the middle of the segment $A_1A_2$ are conciclic.




                            In the picture there is also a quick possible proof.



                            The center of the circle $(B_1CB_2)$, denoted by $M$, lies on the side bisectors of $B_1C$, respectively $B_2C$, being thus determined as their intersection. The centers $O_1$, respectively $O_2$ lie on them, and the triangle $MO_1O_2$ is isosceles, $MO_1=MO_2$, because of the base angles.



                            The perpendicular in $M$ on $O_1O_2$ is thus the mid point of the segment $O_1O_2$. Let $C^*$ be the symmetric of $C$ w.r.t. this perpendicular. Then $C^*$ is also on the circle $(B_1CB_2)$ centered in $M$, since $MC=MC^*$. It remains to observe that $C^*$ is the mid point of $A_1A_2$.



                            $square$






                            share|cite|improve this answer









                            $endgroup$



                            Here is a slightly more general setting:




                            Let $O_1,O_2$ be two points. Choose $C$ on the segment $O_1O_2$. The circles centered in $O_1,O_2$ through $C$ intersect the line $O_1O_2$ in ($C$ and) the (other) points $A_1$, and respectively $A_2$. Consider now from $A_1, A_2$ two rays in the same half plane w.r.t. $O_1O_2$ making the same angle with $O_1O_2$. Let $B_1,B_2$ be the intersection of the rays with the circles $(O_1)$, respectively $(O_2)$.



                            3241370



                            Then the points $C,B_1,B_2$ and the middle of the segment $A_1A_2$ are conciclic.




                            In the picture there is also a quick possible proof.



                            The center of the circle $(B_1CB_2)$, denoted by $M$, lies on the side bisectors of $B_1C$, respectively $B_2C$, being thus determined as their intersection. The centers $O_1$, respectively $O_2$ lie on them, and the triangle $MO_1O_2$ is isosceles, $MO_1=MO_2$, because of the base angles.



                            The perpendicular in $M$ on $O_1O_2$ is thus the mid point of the segment $O_1O_2$. Let $C^*$ be the symmetric of $C$ w.r.t. this perpendicular. Then $C^*$ is also on the circle $(B_1CB_2)$ centered in $M$, since $MC=MC^*$. It remains to observe that $C^*$ is the mid point of $A_1A_2$.



                            $square$







                            share|cite|improve this answer












                            share|cite|improve this answer



                            share|cite|improve this answer










                            answered May 27 at 13:37









                            dan_fuleadan_fulea

                            10.3k1 gold badge6 silver badges15 bronze badges




                            10.3k1 gold badge6 silver badges15 bronze badges


































                                draft saved

                                draft discarded



















































                                Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


                                • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                                But avoid



                                • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                                • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                                Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                                To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                                draft saved


                                draft discarded














                                StackExchange.ready(
                                function () {
                                StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3241370%2fcircumcircle-bisects-the-segment-connecting-the-vertices-of-two-regular-even-sid%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                                }
                                );

                                Post as a guest















                                Required, but never shown





















































                                Required, but never shown














                                Required, but never shown












                                Required, but never shown







                                Required, but never shown

































                                Required, but never shown














                                Required, but never shown












                                Required, but never shown







                                Required, but never shown







                                Popular posts from this blog

                                Færeyskur hestur Heimild | Tengill | Tilvísanir | LeiðsagnarvalRossið - síða um færeyska hrossið á færeyskuGott ár hjá færeyska hestinum

                                He _____ here since 1970 . Answer needed [closed]What does “since he was so high” mean?Meaning of “catch birds for”?How do I ensure “since” takes the meaning I want?“Who cares here” meaningWhat does “right round toward” mean?the time tense (had now been detected)What does the phrase “ring around the roses” mean here?Correct usage of “visited upon”Meaning of “foiled rail sabotage bid”It was the third time I had gone to Rome or It is the third time I had been to Rome

                                Slayer Innehåll Historia | Stil, komposition och lyrik | Bandets betydelse och framgångar | Sidoprojekt och samarbeten | Kontroverser | Medlemmar | Utmärkelser och nomineringar | Turnéer och festivaler | Diskografi | Referenser | Externa länkar | Navigeringsmenywww.slayer.net”Metal Massacre vol. 1””Metal Massacre vol. 3””Metal Massacre Volume III””Show No Mercy””Haunting the Chapel””Live Undead””Hell Awaits””Reign in Blood””Reign in Blood””Gold & Platinum – Reign in Blood””Golden Gods Awards Winners”originalet”Kerrang! Hall Of Fame””Slayer Looks Back On 37-Year Career In New Video Series: Part Two””South of Heaven””Gold & Platinum – South of Heaven””Seasons in the Abyss””Gold & Platinum - Seasons in the Abyss””Divine Intervention””Divine Intervention - Release group by Slayer””Gold & Platinum - Divine Intervention””Live Intrusion””Undisputed Attitude””Abolish Government/Superficial Love””Release “Slatanic Slaughter: A Tribute to Slayer” by Various Artists””Diabolus in Musica””Soundtrack to the Apocalypse””God Hates Us All””Systematic - Relationships””War at the Warfield””Gold & Platinum - War at the Warfield””Soundtrack to the Apocalypse””Gold & Platinum - Still Reigning””Metallica, Slayer, Iron Mauden Among Winners At Metal Hammer Awards””Eternal Pyre””Eternal Pyre - Slayer release group””Eternal Pyre””Metal Storm Awards 2006””Kerrang! Hall Of Fame””Slayer Wins 'Best Metal' Grammy Award””Slayer Guitarist Jeff Hanneman Dies””Bullet-For My Valentine booed at Metal Hammer Golden Gods Awards””Unholy Aliance””The End Of Slayer?””Slayer: We Could Thrash Out Two More Albums If We're Fast Enough...””'The Unholy Alliance: Chapter III' UK Dates Added”originalet”Megadeth And Slayer To Co-Headline 'Canadian Carnage' Trek”originalet”World Painted Blood””Release “World Painted Blood” by Slayer””Metallica Heading To Cinemas””Slayer, Megadeth To Join Forces For 'European Carnage' Tour - Dec. 18, 2010”originalet”Slayer's Hanneman Contracts Acute Infection; Band To Bring In Guest Guitarist””Cannibal Corpse's Pat O'Brien Will Step In As Slayer's Guest Guitarist”originalet”Slayer’s Jeff Hanneman Dead at 49””Dave Lombardo Says He Made Only $67,000 In 2011 While Touring With Slayer””Slayer: We Do Not Agree With Dave Lombardo's Substance Or Timeline Of Events””Slayer Welcomes Drummer Paul Bostaph Back To The Fold””Slayer Hope to Unveil Never-Before-Heard Jeff Hanneman Material on Next Album””Slayer Debut New Song 'Implode' During Surprise Golden Gods Appearance””Release group Repentless by Slayer””Repentless - Slayer - Credits””Slayer””Metal Storm Awards 2015””Slayer - to release comic book "Repentless #1"””Slayer To Release 'Repentless' 6.66" Vinyl Box Set””BREAKING NEWS: Slayer Announce Farewell Tour””Slayer Recruit Lamb of God, Anthrax, Behemoth + Testament for Final Tour””Slayer lägger ner efter 37 år””Slayer Announces Second North American Leg Of 'Final' Tour””Final World Tour””Slayer Announces Final European Tour With Lamb of God, Anthrax And Obituary””Slayer To Tour Europe With Lamb of God, Anthrax And Obituary””Slayer To Play 'Last French Show Ever' At Next Year's Hellfst””Slayer's Final World Tour Will Extend Into 2019””Death Angel's Rob Cavestany On Slayer's 'Farewell' Tour: 'Some Of Us Could See This Coming'””Testament Has No Plans To Retire Anytime Soon, Says Chuck Billy””Anthrax's Scott Ian On Slayer's 'Farewell' Tour Plans: 'I Was Surprised And I Wasn't Surprised'””Slayer””Slayer's Morbid Schlock””Review/Rock; For Slayer, the Mania Is the Message””Slayer - Biography””Slayer - Reign In Blood”originalet”Dave Lombardo””An exclusive oral history of Slayer”originalet”Exclusive! Interview With Slayer Guitarist Jeff Hanneman”originalet”Thinking Out Loud: Slayer's Kerry King on hair metal, Satan and being polite””Slayer Lyrics””Slayer - Biography””Most influential artists for extreme metal music””Slayer - Reign in Blood””Slayer guitarist Jeff Hanneman dies aged 49””Slatanic Slaughter: A Tribute to Slayer””Gateway to Hell: A Tribute to Slayer””Covered In Blood””Slayer: The Origins of Thrash in San Francisco, CA.””Why They Rule - #6 Slayer”originalet”Guitar World's 100 Greatest Heavy Metal Guitarists Of All Time”originalet”The fans have spoken: Slayer comes out on top in readers' polls”originalet”Tribute to Jeff Hanneman (1964-2013)””Lamb Of God Frontman: We Sound Like A Slayer Rip-Off””BEHEMOTH Frontman Pays Tribute To SLAYER's JEFF HANNEMAN””Slayer, Hatebreed Doing Double Duty On This Year's Ozzfest””System of a Down””Lacuna Coil’s Andrea Ferro Talks Influences, Skateboarding, Band Origins + More””Slayer - Reign in Blood””Into The Lungs of Hell””Slayer rules - en utställning om fans””Slayer and Their Fans Slashed Through a No-Holds-Barred Night at Gas Monkey””Home””Slayer””Gold & Platinum - The Big 4 Live from Sofia, Bulgaria””Exclusive! Interview With Slayer Guitarist Kerry King””2008-02-23: Wiltern, Los Angeles, CA, USA””Slayer's Kerry King To Perform With Megadeth Tonight! - Oct. 21, 2010”originalet”Dave Lombardo - Biography”Slayer Case DismissedArkiveradUltimate Classic Rock: Slayer guitarist Jeff Hanneman dead at 49.”Slayer: "We could never do any thing like Some Kind Of Monster..."””Cannibal Corpse'S Pat O'Brien Will Step In As Slayer'S Guest Guitarist | The Official Slayer Site”originalet”Slayer Wins 'Best Metal' Grammy Award””Slayer Guitarist Jeff Hanneman Dies””Kerrang! Awards 2006 Blog: Kerrang! Hall Of Fame””Kerrang! Awards 2013: Kerrang! Legend”originalet”Metallica, Slayer, Iron Maien Among Winners At Metal Hammer Awards””Metal Hammer Golden Gods Awards””Bullet For My Valentine Booed At Metal Hammer Golden Gods Awards””Metal Storm Awards 2006””Metal Storm Awards 2015””Slayer's Concert History””Slayer - Relationships””Slayer - Releases”Slayers officiella webbplatsSlayer på MusicBrainzOfficiell webbplatsSlayerSlayerr1373445760000 0001 1540 47353068615-5086262726cb13906545x(data)6033143kn20030215029